Naive Bayes Classifier - Discriminant Function2019 Community Moderator ElectionSPARK, ML: Naive Bayes classifier often assigns 1 as probability predictionHandling underflow in a Gaussian Naive Bayes classifierName Entity Linking with Naive Bayes ClassifierOverfitting Naive BayesBias in Naive Bayes classifierHow do i use the Gaussian function with a Naive Bayes Classifier?Very low probability in naive Bayes classifierBinary classification, precision-recall curve and thresholdsOne class naive bayesNaive Bayes Classifier

aging parents with no investments

Can one use the reaction spell from the War Caster feat to cast Bigby's Hand?

Information to fellow intern about hiring?

Dual Citizen. Exited the US on Italian passport recently

Extreme, but not acceptable situation and I can't start the work tomorrow morning

Is a Black Hole Gun Possible? (asking for a friend)

What do the Banks children have against barley water?

A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky

What happens when a metallic dragon and a chromatic dragon mate?

Does a dangling wire really electrocute me if I'm standing in water?

Is this food a bread or a loaf?

Are objects structures and/or vice versa?

Landlord wants to switch my lease to a "Land contract" to "get back at the city"

How can I plot a Farey diagram?

How to deal with fear of taking dependencies

How would photo IDs work for shapeshifters?

Creating a loop after a break using Markov Chain in Tikz

What is the meaning of "of trouble" in the following sentence?

Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?

Why was the "bread communication" in the arena of Catching Fire left out in the movie?

"My colleague's body is amazing"

Does the average primeness of natural numbers tend to zero?

Unbreakable Formation vs. Cry of the Carnarium

Domain expired, GoDaddy holds it and is asking more money



Naive Bayes Classifier - Discriminant Function



2019 Community Moderator ElectionSPARK, ML: Naive Bayes classifier often assigns 1 as probability predictionHandling underflow in a Gaussian Naive Bayes classifierName Entity Linking with Naive Bayes ClassifierOverfitting Naive BayesBias in Naive Bayes classifierHow do i use the Gaussian function with a Naive Bayes Classifier?Very low probability in naive Bayes classifierBinary classification, precision-recall curve and thresholdsOne class naive bayesNaive Bayes Classifier










1












$begingroup$


To classify my samples, I decided to use Naive Bayes classifier, but I coded it, not used built-in library functions.



If I use this equality, I obtain nice classification accuracy: p1(x) > p2(x) => x belongs to C1



However, I could not understand why discriminant functions produce negative values. If they are probability functions, I think they must generate a value between 0 and 1.



Is there anyone who can explain the reason ?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    1












    $begingroup$


    To classify my samples, I decided to use Naive Bayes classifier, but I coded it, not used built-in library functions.



    If I use this equality, I obtain nice classification accuracy: p1(x) > p2(x) => x belongs to C1



    However, I could not understand why discriminant functions produce negative values. If they are probability functions, I think they must generate a value between 0 and 1.



    Is there anyone who can explain the reason ?










    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      To classify my samples, I decided to use Naive Bayes classifier, but I coded it, not used built-in library functions.



      If I use this equality, I obtain nice classification accuracy: p1(x) > p2(x) => x belongs to C1



      However, I could not understand why discriminant functions produce negative values. If they are probability functions, I think they must generate a value between 0 and 1.



      Is there anyone who can explain the reason ?










      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      To classify my samples, I decided to use Naive Bayes classifier, but I coded it, not used built-in library functions.



      If I use this equality, I obtain nice classification accuracy: p1(x) > p2(x) => x belongs to C1



      However, I could not understand why discriminant functions produce negative values. If they are probability functions, I think they must generate a value between 0 and 1.



      Is there anyone who can explain the reason ?







      classification naive-bayes-classifier discriminant-analysis






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Mar 28 at 18:35









      GoktugGoktug

      1083




      1083




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          In Naive Bayes, for the case of two classes, a discriminant function could be $$D(boldsymbolx) = fracP(boldsymbolx, c=1)P(boldsymbolx, c=0)$$ which can be anywhere in $[0, +infty)$, and decides $c=1$ if $D(boldsymbolx)>1$, $c=0$ otherwise, or it could be the logarithm of that value



          $$d(boldsymbolx) = textlogfracP(boldsymbolx, c=1)P(boldsymbolx, c=0)=textlogP(boldsymbolx, c=1)-textlogP(boldsymbolx, c=0)$$
          which can be anywhere in $(-infty, +infty)$ (handling zero probability as a special case), and decides $c=1$ if $d(boldsymbolx)>0$, $c=0$ otherwise.



          As a side note, $P(boldsymbolx, c=k)$ in Naive Bayes is calculated as
          $$P(boldsymbolx, c=k)=P(c=k)prod_i=1^dP(x_i|c=k)$$
          or equivalently for log probabilities as
          $$textlogP(boldsymbolx, c=k)=textlogP(c=k) + sum_i=1^dtextlogP(x_i|c=k)$$






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Thank you so much. While I was designing my bayes classifier, I took natural logarithm of posterior probability to make probability formula less complicated. Because I benefited from normal distribution function when I define probability discriminant function.
            $endgroup$
            – Goktug
            Mar 28 at 19:15











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "557"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f48169%2fnaive-bayes-classifier-discriminant-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1












          $begingroup$

          In Naive Bayes, for the case of two classes, a discriminant function could be $$D(boldsymbolx) = fracP(boldsymbolx, c=1)P(boldsymbolx, c=0)$$ which can be anywhere in $[0, +infty)$, and decides $c=1$ if $D(boldsymbolx)>1$, $c=0$ otherwise, or it could be the logarithm of that value



          $$d(boldsymbolx) = textlogfracP(boldsymbolx, c=1)P(boldsymbolx, c=0)=textlogP(boldsymbolx, c=1)-textlogP(boldsymbolx, c=0)$$
          which can be anywhere in $(-infty, +infty)$ (handling zero probability as a special case), and decides $c=1$ if $d(boldsymbolx)>0$, $c=0$ otherwise.



          As a side note, $P(boldsymbolx, c=k)$ in Naive Bayes is calculated as
          $$P(boldsymbolx, c=k)=P(c=k)prod_i=1^dP(x_i|c=k)$$
          or equivalently for log probabilities as
          $$textlogP(boldsymbolx, c=k)=textlogP(c=k) + sum_i=1^dtextlogP(x_i|c=k)$$






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Thank you so much. While I was designing my bayes classifier, I took natural logarithm of posterior probability to make probability formula less complicated. Because I benefited from normal distribution function when I define probability discriminant function.
            $endgroup$
            – Goktug
            Mar 28 at 19:15















          1












          $begingroup$

          In Naive Bayes, for the case of two classes, a discriminant function could be $$D(boldsymbolx) = fracP(boldsymbolx, c=1)P(boldsymbolx, c=0)$$ which can be anywhere in $[0, +infty)$, and decides $c=1$ if $D(boldsymbolx)>1$, $c=0$ otherwise, or it could be the logarithm of that value



          $$d(boldsymbolx) = textlogfracP(boldsymbolx, c=1)P(boldsymbolx, c=0)=textlogP(boldsymbolx, c=1)-textlogP(boldsymbolx, c=0)$$
          which can be anywhere in $(-infty, +infty)$ (handling zero probability as a special case), and decides $c=1$ if $d(boldsymbolx)>0$, $c=0$ otherwise.



          As a side note, $P(boldsymbolx, c=k)$ in Naive Bayes is calculated as
          $$P(boldsymbolx, c=k)=P(c=k)prod_i=1^dP(x_i|c=k)$$
          or equivalently for log probabilities as
          $$textlogP(boldsymbolx, c=k)=textlogP(c=k) + sum_i=1^dtextlogP(x_i|c=k)$$






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Thank you so much. While I was designing my bayes classifier, I took natural logarithm of posterior probability to make probability formula less complicated. Because I benefited from normal distribution function when I define probability discriminant function.
            $endgroup$
            – Goktug
            Mar 28 at 19:15













          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          In Naive Bayes, for the case of two classes, a discriminant function could be $$D(boldsymbolx) = fracP(boldsymbolx, c=1)P(boldsymbolx, c=0)$$ which can be anywhere in $[0, +infty)$, and decides $c=1$ if $D(boldsymbolx)>1$, $c=0$ otherwise, or it could be the logarithm of that value



          $$d(boldsymbolx) = textlogfracP(boldsymbolx, c=1)P(boldsymbolx, c=0)=textlogP(boldsymbolx, c=1)-textlogP(boldsymbolx, c=0)$$
          which can be anywhere in $(-infty, +infty)$ (handling zero probability as a special case), and decides $c=1$ if $d(boldsymbolx)>0$, $c=0$ otherwise.



          As a side note, $P(boldsymbolx, c=k)$ in Naive Bayes is calculated as
          $$P(boldsymbolx, c=k)=P(c=k)prod_i=1^dP(x_i|c=k)$$
          or equivalently for log probabilities as
          $$textlogP(boldsymbolx, c=k)=textlogP(c=k) + sum_i=1^dtextlogP(x_i|c=k)$$






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          In Naive Bayes, for the case of two classes, a discriminant function could be $$D(boldsymbolx) = fracP(boldsymbolx, c=1)P(boldsymbolx, c=0)$$ which can be anywhere in $[0, +infty)$, and decides $c=1$ if $D(boldsymbolx)>1$, $c=0$ otherwise, or it could be the logarithm of that value



          $$d(boldsymbolx) = textlogfracP(boldsymbolx, c=1)P(boldsymbolx, c=0)=textlogP(boldsymbolx, c=1)-textlogP(boldsymbolx, c=0)$$
          which can be anywhere in $(-infty, +infty)$ (handling zero probability as a special case), and decides $c=1$ if $d(boldsymbolx)>0$, $c=0$ otherwise.



          As a side note, $P(boldsymbolx, c=k)$ in Naive Bayes is calculated as
          $$P(boldsymbolx, c=k)=P(c=k)prod_i=1^dP(x_i|c=k)$$
          or equivalently for log probabilities as
          $$textlogP(boldsymbolx, c=k)=textlogP(c=k) + sum_i=1^dtextlogP(x_i|c=k)$$







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Mar 28 at 19:01

























          answered Mar 28 at 18:51









          EsmailianEsmailian

          2,805318




          2,805318







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Thank you so much. While I was designing my bayes classifier, I took natural logarithm of posterior probability to make probability formula less complicated. Because I benefited from normal distribution function when I define probability discriminant function.
            $endgroup$
            – Goktug
            Mar 28 at 19:15












          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Thank you so much. While I was designing my bayes classifier, I took natural logarithm of posterior probability to make probability formula less complicated. Because I benefited from normal distribution function when I define probability discriminant function.
            $endgroup$
            – Goktug
            Mar 28 at 19:15







          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          Thank you so much. While I was designing my bayes classifier, I took natural logarithm of posterior probability to make probability formula less complicated. Because I benefited from normal distribution function when I define probability discriminant function.
          $endgroup$
          – Goktug
          Mar 28 at 19:15




          $begingroup$
          Thank you so much. While I was designing my bayes classifier, I took natural logarithm of posterior probability to make probability formula less complicated. Because I benefited from normal distribution function when I define probability discriminant function.
          $endgroup$
          – Goktug
          Mar 28 at 19:15

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f48169%2fnaive-bayes-classifier-discriminant-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Adding axes to figuresAdding axes labels to LaTeX figuresLaTeX equivalent of ConTeXt buffersRotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?adding axes to shapesAlign axes across subfiguresAdding figures with a certain orderLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themAdding axes labels to LaTeX figures

          Tähtien Talli Jäsenet | Lähteet | NavigointivalikkoSuomen Hippos – Tähtien Talli

          Do these cracks on my tires look bad? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowDry rot tire should I replace?Having to replace tiresFishtailed so easily? Bad tires? ABS?Filling the tires with something other than air, to avoid puncture hassles?Used Michelin tires safe to install?Do these tyre cracks necessitate replacement?Rumbling noise: tires or mechanicalIs it possible to fix noisy feathered tires?Are bad winter tires still better than summer tires in winter?Torque converter failure - Related to replacing only 2 tires?Why use snow tires on all 4 wheels on 2-wheel-drive cars?