Why do airplanes bank sharply to the right after air-to-air refueling?What is this turn called and how is it performed?Why do Air Forces still use bombers?What are good strategies for the “impossible turn”?Why don't airliners use in-air refueling systems?Cruiser-Feeder Concept - feasible?What is this turn called and how is it performed?Why is there a difference between military parachutes and those used for skydiving?What's this sound? - Dogfight between F14 & MiG23Why do military jets seem to always take off using the afterburner?What procedures are used for midair refueling without air supremacy?How fast do the F-35 weapons bay doors open/close during combat ops?
How would photo IDs work for shapeshifters?
I see my dog run
Why isn't airport relocation done gradually?
Is this food a bread or a loaf?
Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?
Unbreakable Formation vs. Cry of the Carnarium
Extreme, but not acceptable situation and I can't start the work tomorrow morning
Information to fellow intern about hiring?
Should the British be getting ready for a no-deal Brexit?
What happens when a metallic dragon and a chromatic dragon mate?
What is it called when one voice type sings a 'solo'?
How could a lack of term limits lead to a "dictatorship?"
How can I add custom success page
Need help identifying/translating a plaque in Tangier, Morocco
Was there ever an axiom rendered a theorem?
Landlord wants to switch my lease to a "Land contract" to "get back at the city"
Why do UK politicians seemingly ignore opinion polls on Brexit?
Why did the Germans forbid the possession of pet pigeons in Rostov-on-Don in 1941?
Why doesn't a const reference extend the life of a temporary object passed via a function?
Does it makes sense to buy a new cycle to learn riding?
Does a dangling wire really electrocute me if I'm standing in water?
What is the meaning of "of trouble" in the following sentence?
"My colleague's body is amazing"
Landing in very high winds
Why do airplanes bank sharply to the right after air-to-air refueling?
What is this turn called and how is it performed?Why do Air Forces still use bombers?What are good strategies for the “impossible turn”?Why don't airliners use in-air refueling systems?Cruiser-Feeder Concept - feasible?What is this turn called and how is it performed?Why is there a difference between military parachutes and those used for skydiving?What's this sound? - Dogfight between F14 & MiG23Why do military jets seem to always take off using the afterburner?What procedures are used for midair refueling without air supremacy?How fast do the F-35 weapons bay doors open/close during combat ops?
$begingroup$
Whenever I see videos on YouTube they bank really sharply to the right after disconnecting from the tanker. Why wouldn't they do a more shallow 30-degree bank?
See this video for reference:
military maneuver mid-air-refueling
edited Mar 29 at 8:19
ymb1
70.1k7224372
asked Mar 28 at 17:04
pythonhelpthrowpythonhelpthrow
34838
$endgroup$
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
Whenever I see videos on YouTube they bank really sharply to the right after disconnecting from the tanker. Why wouldn't they do a more shallow 30-degree bank?
See this video for reference:
military maneuver mid-air-refueling
edited Mar 29 at 8:19
ymb1
70.1k7224372
asked Mar 28 at 17:04
pythonhelpthrowpythonhelpthrow
34838
$endgroup$
27
$begingroup$
Rule Of Cool. Normally they do a barrel roll.
$endgroup$
– Harper
Mar 28 at 22:17
12
$begingroup$
I don't see "sharply" TBH
$endgroup$
– Mayou36
Mar 29 at 9:41
1
$begingroup$
@mayou36 it is subjective. What is 'sharply' for a landlubber layman might be a soft bank for an airborn flyer. Who knows? I don't. Unless math gets involved and we define the 'sharply' threshold, it is fine to use these terms IMHO
$endgroup$
– Mindwin
Mar 29 at 12:20
3
$begingroup$
The point is, there's nothing abnormal about what's happening here, which is what OP is suggesting.
$endgroup$
– zymhan
Mar 29 at 15:51
5
$begingroup$
The premise of the question is wrong. That's not a "really sharp" bank. It's both shallow and slow; especially if you think in terms of a fighter jet. I would argue that the bank is not "sharp" even for a recreational aircraft.
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Mar 29 at 18:34
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
Whenever I see videos on YouTube they bank really sharply to the right after disconnecting from the tanker. Why wouldn't they do a more shallow 30-degree bank?
See this video for reference:
military maneuver mid-air-refueling
edited Mar 29 at 8:19
ymb1
70.1k7224372
asked Mar 28 at 17:04
pythonhelpthrowpythonhelpthrow
34838
$endgroup$
Whenever I see videos on YouTube they bank really sharply to the right after disconnecting from the tanker. Why wouldn't they do a more shallow 30-degree bank?
See this video for reference:
military maneuver mid-air-refueling
military maneuver mid-air-refueling
edited Mar 29 at 8:19
ymb1
70.1k7224372
asked Mar 28 at 17:04
pythonhelpthrowpythonhelpthrow
34838
edited Mar 29 at 8:19
ymb1
70.1k7224372
asked Mar 28 at 17:04
pythonhelpthrowpythonhelpthrow
34838
edited Mar 29 at 8:19
ymb1
70.1k7224372
edited Mar 29 at 8:19
ymb1
70.1k7224372
edited Mar 29 at 8:19
ymb1
70.1k7224372
70.1k7224372
asked Mar 28 at 17:04
pythonhelpthrowpythonhelpthrow
34838
asked Mar 28 at 17:04
pythonhelpthrowpythonhelpthrow
34838
asked Mar 28 at 17:04
pythonhelpthrowpythonhelpthrow
34838
34838
27
$begingroup$
Rule Of Cool. Normally they do a barrel roll.
$endgroup$
– Harper
Mar 28 at 22:17
12
$begingroup$
I don't see "sharply" TBH
$endgroup$
– Mayou36
Mar 29 at 9:41
1
$begingroup$
@mayou36 it is subjective. What is 'sharply' for a landlubber layman might be a soft bank for an airborn flyer. Who knows? I don't. Unless math gets involved and we define the 'sharply' threshold, it is fine to use these terms IMHO
$endgroup$
– Mindwin
Mar 29 at 12:20
3
$begingroup$
The point is, there's nothing abnormal about what's happening here, which is what OP is suggesting.
$endgroup$
– zymhan
Mar 29 at 15:51
5
$begingroup$
The premise of the question is wrong. That's not a "really sharp" bank. It's both shallow and slow; especially if you think in terms of a fighter jet. I would argue that the bank is not "sharp" even for a recreational aircraft.
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Mar 29 at 18:34
|
show 4 more comments
27
$begingroup$
Rule Of Cool. Normally they do a barrel roll.
$endgroup$
– Harper
Mar 28 at 22:17
12
$begingroup$
I don't see "sharply" TBH
$endgroup$
– Mayou36
Mar 29 at 9:41
1
$begingroup$
@mayou36 it is subjective. What is 'sharply' for a landlubber layman might be a soft bank for an airborn flyer. Who knows? I don't. Unless math gets involved and we define the 'sharply' threshold, it is fine to use these terms IMHO
$endgroup$
– Mindwin
Mar 29 at 12:20
3
$begingroup$
The point is, there's nothing abnormal about what's happening here, which is what OP is suggesting.
$endgroup$
– zymhan
Mar 29 at 15:51
5
$begingroup$
The premise of the question is wrong. That's not a "really sharp" bank. It's both shallow and slow; especially if you think in terms of a fighter jet. I would argue that the bank is not "sharp" even for a recreational aircraft.
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Mar 29 at 18:34
27
27
$begingroup$
Rule Of Cool. Normally they do a barrel roll.
$endgroup$
– Harper
Mar 28 at 22:17
$begingroup$
Rule Of Cool. Normally they do a barrel roll.
$endgroup$
– Harper
Mar 28 at 22:17
12
12
$begingroup$
I don't see "sharply" TBH
$endgroup$
– Mayou36
Mar 29 at 9:41
$begingroup$
I don't see "sharply" TBH
$endgroup$
– Mayou36
Mar 29 at 9:41
1
1
$begingroup$
@mayou36 it is subjective. What is 'sharply' for a landlubber layman might be a soft bank for an airborn flyer. Who knows? I don't. Unless math gets involved and we define the 'sharply' threshold, it is fine to use these terms IMHO
$endgroup$
– Mindwin
Mar 29 at 12:20
$begingroup$
@mayou36 it is subjective. What is 'sharply' for a landlubber layman might be a soft bank for an airborn flyer. Who knows? I don't. Unless math gets involved and we define the 'sharply' threshold, it is fine to use these terms IMHO
$endgroup$
– Mindwin
Mar 29 at 12:20
3
3
$begingroup$
The point is, there's nothing abnormal about what's happening here, which is what OP is suggesting.
$endgroup$
– zymhan
Mar 29 at 15:51
$begingroup$
The point is, there's nothing abnormal about what's happening here, which is what OP is suggesting.
$endgroup$
– zymhan
Mar 29 at 15:51
5
5
$begingroup$
The premise of the question is wrong. That's not a "really sharp" bank. It's both shallow and slow; especially if you think in terms of a fighter jet. I would argue that the bank is not "sharp" even for a recreational aircraft.
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Mar 29 at 18:34
$begingroup$
The premise of the question is wrong. That's not a "really sharp" bank. It's both shallow and slow; especially if you think in terms of a fighter jet. I would argue that the bank is not "sharp" even for a recreational aircraft.
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Mar 29 at 18:34
|
show 4 more comments
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Fighter jets are very maneuverable, so they may make anything from a shallow bank to a breakaway maneuver. The breakaway is a standard way for fighter jets to exit a formation. It provides a way to safely and quickly gain separation from the other aircraft.
In this case the bank is fairly shallow, but when the aircraft disconnects they are already in a shallow right turn, so the total bank angle is a bit larger.
answered Mar 28 at 17:18
foootfooot
54.4k18174327
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Some may choose to do a gentle breakaway.
$endgroup$
– ymb1
Mar 29 at 8:02
4
$begingroup$
That was not a breakaway maneuver, that was just moving to the outside of the formation.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hall
Mar 29 at 17:00
4
$begingroup$
The video absolutely does not show a breakaway manoeuvre. This is incorrect.
$endgroup$
– J...
Mar 29 at 17:43
$begingroup$
@ymb1 Also, see the second fj in formation, he does a much sharper turn away.
$endgroup$
– Czechnology
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Doesn't really look all that aggressive to me, either way the fighter and the tanker are very vulnerable while refueling. Usually there is more than one aircraft waiting to refuel, so the goal of this game is to run as many of the aircraft in formation through refueling as quickly as possible.
In order to do that, you need to get your wake out of the way for the next guy to get a smooth approach to the basket. As Fooot says in his answer, the pilot is using a standard "breakaway" maneuver to get out of the formation and wait for the other pilots in the flight to get the fuel and continue with the mission.
Plus you just got a full tank of fuel in the world's funnest military equipment...
edited Mar 28 at 22:55
reirab
14.3k140108
answered Mar 28 at 17:33
Ron BeyerRon Beyer
22.5k282103
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
I agree it doesn't look very aggressive, and therefore wouldn't call it a "breakaway". In fact this pilot was not even leaving the formation, he simply moved to the right side and stopped there. Perhaps waiting on a wingman to top off...
$endgroup$
– Michael Hall
Mar 29 at 17:10
3
$begingroup$
A breakaway is for... breaking away... quickly. The plane did not leave the formation. It did not move to the side quickly either. It just casually repositioned itself in the formation.
$endgroup$
– J...
Mar 29 at 17:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Different air forces may operate with different conventions, but right from basic flight training the RAF classifies banked turns of 20 degrees as "gentle," 40 as "medium" and 60 as "steep," and the most commonly used are "medium".
Ref: The RAF Basic Flying Manual (1952 edition) - https://www.t6harvard.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Chapter-3.pdf page 26-27.
The video is just a 40 degree banked turn.
The aircraft have no problem handling the G loads in 60 degree banked turns, and there are not going to be any complaints from passengers in Business Class that the flight crew spilled their gin and tonic!
answered Mar 28 at 22:06
alephzeroalephzero
1,721412
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
Even most light piston aircraft have no problem with 60 degree banked turns. It's just 2 Gs if you hold altitude. That's nothing for a fighter.
$endgroup$
– reirab
Mar 28 at 22:58
add a comment |
$begingroup$
They do this because there are 3 main parts to an air to air refuel:
- port observation where they wait to be refueled in a line.
- refuel area where they actually get refueled.
- reform area where they wait for the rest of the squadron.
After the refuel, they will bank the right to go to the reform area and will wait for the rest of there squadron. Once everyone is refueled then they break from the tanker.
answered Mar 29 at 23:08
Zac CallaghanZac Callaghan
168110
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A jet joins on one side of the tanker then when its turn comes moves behind to tank then when finished, clears off to the other side. Bear in mind a whole formation may be tanking and need to flow through the same process. The turn after tanking is not a hard turn in fast jet terms.
answered Mar 29 at 8:13
DerekDerek
791
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
many people have already explained
$endgroup$
– Zac Callaghan
Apr 3 at 3:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Others seem to have answered the why such a sharp maneuver part of the question, so I will answer the why to the right part. Collision avoidance in aircraft is always by turning to the right when possible. Keeping the formation in such a way that the pilot can always escape to the right is probably done to ensure safety, as it lines up with the engrained training.
answered Mar 29 at 19:37
XRFXRF
3285
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Two aircraft must either be flying in formation, or be far apart, to be safe. While the fighter is in the process of leaving the tanker, it is neither. It therefore moves away quickly using the standard breakaway manoeuvre. Bank really sharply? The video showed a positively leisurely turn in the circumstances.
Why to the right? It's standard to approach on the left side of the tanker. That's where other fighters waiting and approaching to refuel will be, so the left is a good side to avoid.
answered Mar 29 at 15:31
Neil_UKNeil_UK
21914
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I agree it was leisurely, but "leisurely" and "breakaway" don't go together...
$endgroup$
– Michael Hall
Mar 29 at 19:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To gain as much seperation as quickly as possible.
answered Mar 28 at 20:36
WindshearWindshear
2834
$endgroup$
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "528"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f61735%2fwhy-do-airplanes-bank-sharply-to-the-right-after-air-to-air-refueling%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
8 Answers
8
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Fighter jets are very maneuverable, so they may make anything from a shallow bank to a breakaway maneuver. The breakaway is a standard way for fighter jets to exit a formation. It provides a way to safely and quickly gain separation from the other aircraft.
In this case the bank is fairly shallow, but when the aircraft disconnects they are already in a shallow right turn, so the total bank angle is a bit larger.
answered Mar 28 at 17:18
foootfooot
54.4k18174327
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Some may choose to do a gentle breakaway.
$endgroup$
– ymb1
Mar 29 at 8:02
4
$begingroup$
That was not a breakaway maneuver, that was just moving to the outside of the formation.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hall
Mar 29 at 17:00
4
$begingroup$
The video absolutely does not show a breakaway manoeuvre. This is incorrect.
$endgroup$
– J...
Mar 29 at 17:43
$begingroup$
@ymb1 Also, see the second fj in formation, he does a much sharper turn away.
$endgroup$
– Czechnology
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Fighter jets are very maneuverable, so they may make anything from a shallow bank to a breakaway maneuver. The breakaway is a standard way for fighter jets to exit a formation. It provides a way to safely and quickly gain separation from the other aircraft.
In this case the bank is fairly shallow, but when the aircraft disconnects they are already in a shallow right turn, so the total bank angle is a bit larger.
answered Mar 28 at 17:18
foootfooot
54.4k18174327
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Some may choose to do a gentle breakaway.
$endgroup$
– ymb1
Mar 29 at 8:02
4
$begingroup$
That was not a breakaway maneuver, that was just moving to the outside of the formation.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hall
Mar 29 at 17:00
4
$begingroup$
The video absolutely does not show a breakaway manoeuvre. This is incorrect.
$endgroup$
– J...
Mar 29 at 17:43
$begingroup$
@ymb1 Also, see the second fj in formation, he does a much sharper turn away.
$endgroup$
– Czechnology
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Fighter jets are very maneuverable, so they may make anything from a shallow bank to a breakaway maneuver. The breakaway is a standard way for fighter jets to exit a formation. It provides a way to safely and quickly gain separation from the other aircraft.
In this case the bank is fairly shallow, but when the aircraft disconnects they are already in a shallow right turn, so the total bank angle is a bit larger.
answered Mar 28 at 17:18
foootfooot
54.4k18174327
$endgroup$
Fighter jets are very maneuverable, so they may make anything from a shallow bank to a breakaway maneuver. The breakaway is a standard way for fighter jets to exit a formation. It provides a way to safely and quickly gain separation from the other aircraft.
In this case the bank is fairly shallow, but when the aircraft disconnects they are already in a shallow right turn, so the total bank angle is a bit larger.
answered Mar 28 at 17:18
foootfooot
54.4k18174327
edited Mar 29 at 18:04
answered Mar 28 at 17:18
foootfooot
54.4k18174327
answered Mar 28 at 17:18
foootfooot
54.4k18174327
answered Mar 28 at 17:18
foootfooot
54.4k18174327
54.4k18174327
2
$begingroup$
Some may choose to do a gentle breakaway.
$endgroup$
– ymb1
Mar 29 at 8:02
4
$begingroup$
That was not a breakaway maneuver, that was just moving to the outside of the formation.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hall
Mar 29 at 17:00
4
$begingroup$
The video absolutely does not show a breakaway manoeuvre. This is incorrect.
$endgroup$
– J...
Mar 29 at 17:43
$begingroup$
@ymb1 Also, see the second fj in formation, he does a much sharper turn away.
$endgroup$
– Czechnology
yesterday
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
Some may choose to do a gentle breakaway.
$endgroup$
– ymb1
Mar 29 at 8:02
4
$begingroup$
That was not a breakaway maneuver, that was just moving to the outside of the formation.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hall
Mar 29 at 17:00
4
$begingroup$
The video absolutely does not show a breakaway manoeuvre. This is incorrect.
$endgroup$
– J...
Mar 29 at 17:43
$begingroup$
@ymb1 Also, see the second fj in formation, he does a much sharper turn away.
$endgroup$
– Czechnology
yesterday
2
2
$begingroup$
Some may choose to do a gentle breakaway.
$endgroup$
– ymb1
Mar 29 at 8:02
$begingroup$
Some may choose to do a gentle breakaway.
$endgroup$
– ymb1
Mar 29 at 8:02
4
4
$begingroup$
That was not a breakaway maneuver, that was just moving to the outside of the formation.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hall
Mar 29 at 17:00
$begingroup$
That was not a breakaway maneuver, that was just moving to the outside of the formation.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hall
Mar 29 at 17:00
4
4
$begingroup$
The video absolutely does not show a breakaway manoeuvre. This is incorrect.
$endgroup$
– J...
Mar 29 at 17:43
$begingroup$
The video absolutely does not show a breakaway manoeuvre. This is incorrect.
$endgroup$
– J...
Mar 29 at 17:43
$begingroup$
@ymb1 Also, see the second fj in formation, he does a much sharper turn away.
$endgroup$
– Czechnology
yesterday
$begingroup$
@ymb1 Also, see the second fj in formation, he does a much sharper turn away.
$endgroup$
– Czechnology
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Doesn't really look all that aggressive to me, either way the fighter and the tanker are very vulnerable while refueling. Usually there is more than one aircraft waiting to refuel, so the goal of this game is to run as many of the aircraft in formation through refueling as quickly as possible.
In order to do that, you need to get your wake out of the way for the next guy to get a smooth approach to the basket. As Fooot says in his answer, the pilot is using a standard "breakaway" maneuver to get out of the formation and wait for the other pilots in the flight to get the fuel and continue with the mission.
Plus you just got a full tank of fuel in the world's funnest military equipment...
edited Mar 28 at 22:55
reirab
14.3k140108
answered Mar 28 at 17:33
Ron BeyerRon Beyer
22.5k282103
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
I agree it doesn't look very aggressive, and therefore wouldn't call it a "breakaway". In fact this pilot was not even leaving the formation, he simply moved to the right side and stopped there. Perhaps waiting on a wingman to top off...
$endgroup$
– Michael Hall
Mar 29 at 17:10
3
$begingroup$
A breakaway is for... breaking away... quickly. The plane did not leave the formation. It did not move to the side quickly either. It just casually repositioned itself in the formation.
$endgroup$
– J...
Mar 29 at 17:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Doesn't really look all that aggressive to me, either way the fighter and the tanker are very vulnerable while refueling. Usually there is more than one aircraft waiting to refuel, so the goal of this game is to run as many of the aircraft in formation through refueling as quickly as possible.
In order to do that, you need to get your wake out of the way for the next guy to get a smooth approach to the basket. As Fooot says in his answer, the pilot is using a standard "breakaway" maneuver to get out of the formation and wait for the other pilots in the flight to get the fuel and continue with the mission.
Plus you just got a full tank of fuel in the world's funnest military equipment...
edited Mar 28 at 22:55
reirab
14.3k140108
answered Mar 28 at 17:33
Ron BeyerRon Beyer
22.5k282103
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
I agree it doesn't look very aggressive, and therefore wouldn't call it a "breakaway". In fact this pilot was not even leaving the formation, he simply moved to the right side and stopped there. Perhaps waiting on a wingman to top off...
$endgroup$
– Michael Hall
Mar 29 at 17:10
3
$begingroup$
A breakaway is for... breaking away... quickly. The plane did not leave the formation. It did not move to the side quickly either. It just casually repositioned itself in the formation.
$endgroup$
– J...
Mar 29 at 17:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Doesn't really look all that aggressive to me, either way the fighter and the tanker are very vulnerable while refueling. Usually there is more than one aircraft waiting to refuel, so the goal of this game is to run as many of the aircraft in formation through refueling as quickly as possible.
In order to do that, you need to get your wake out of the way for the next guy to get a smooth approach to the basket. As Fooot says in his answer, the pilot is using a standard "breakaway" maneuver to get out of the formation and wait for the other pilots in the flight to get the fuel and continue with the mission.
Plus you just got a full tank of fuel in the world's funnest military equipment...
edited Mar 28 at 22:55
reirab
14.3k140108
answered Mar 28 at 17:33
Ron BeyerRon Beyer
22.5k282103
$endgroup$
Doesn't really look all that aggressive to me, either way the fighter and the tanker are very vulnerable while refueling. Usually there is more than one aircraft waiting to refuel, so the goal of this game is to run as many of the aircraft in formation through refueling as quickly as possible.
In order to do that, you need to get your wake out of the way for the next guy to get a smooth approach to the basket. As Fooot says in his answer, the pilot is using a standard "breakaway" maneuver to get out of the formation and wait for the other pilots in the flight to get the fuel and continue with the mission.
Plus you just got a full tank of fuel in the world's funnest military equipment...
edited Mar 28 at 22:55
reirab
14.3k140108
answered Mar 28 at 17:33
Ron BeyerRon Beyer
22.5k282103
edited Mar 28 at 22:55
reirab
14.3k140108
edited Mar 28 at 22:55
reirab
14.3k140108
edited Mar 28 at 22:55
reirab
14.3k140108
14.3k140108
answered Mar 28 at 17:33
Ron BeyerRon Beyer
22.5k282103
answered Mar 28 at 17:33
Ron BeyerRon Beyer
22.5k282103
answered Mar 28 at 17:33
Ron BeyerRon Beyer
22.5k282103
22.5k282103
2
$begingroup$
I agree it doesn't look very aggressive, and therefore wouldn't call it a "breakaway". In fact this pilot was not even leaving the formation, he simply moved to the right side and stopped there. Perhaps waiting on a wingman to top off...
$endgroup$
– Michael Hall
Mar 29 at 17:10
3
$begingroup$
A breakaway is for... breaking away... quickly. The plane did not leave the formation. It did not move to the side quickly either. It just casually repositioned itself in the formation.
$endgroup$
– J...
Mar 29 at 17:50
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
I agree it doesn't look very aggressive, and therefore wouldn't call it a "breakaway". In fact this pilot was not even leaving the formation, he simply moved to the right side and stopped there. Perhaps waiting on a wingman to top off...
$endgroup$
– Michael Hall
Mar 29 at 17:10
3
$begingroup$
A breakaway is for... breaking away... quickly. The plane did not leave the formation. It did not move to the side quickly either. It just casually repositioned itself in the formation.
$endgroup$
– J...
Mar 29 at 17:50
2
2
$begingroup$
I agree it doesn't look very aggressive, and therefore wouldn't call it a "breakaway". In fact this pilot was not even leaving the formation, he simply moved to the right side and stopped there. Perhaps waiting on a wingman to top off...
$endgroup$
– Michael Hall
Mar 29 at 17:10
$begingroup$
I agree it doesn't look very aggressive, and therefore wouldn't call it a "breakaway". In fact this pilot was not even leaving the formation, he simply moved to the right side and stopped there. Perhaps waiting on a wingman to top off...
$endgroup$
– Michael Hall
Mar 29 at 17:10
3
3
$begingroup$
A breakaway is for... breaking away... quickly. The plane did not leave the formation. It did not move to the side quickly either. It just casually repositioned itself in the formation.
$endgroup$
– J...
Mar 29 at 17:50
$begingroup$
A breakaway is for... breaking away... quickly. The plane did not leave the formation. It did not move to the side quickly either. It just casually repositioned itself in the formation.
$endgroup$
– J...
Mar 29 at 17:50
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Different air forces may operate with different conventions, but right from basic flight training the RAF classifies banked turns of 20 degrees as "gentle," 40 as "medium" and 60 as "steep," and the most commonly used are "medium".
Ref: The RAF Basic Flying Manual (1952 edition) - https://www.t6harvard.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Chapter-3.pdf page 26-27.
The video is just a 40 degree banked turn.
The aircraft have no problem handling the G loads in 60 degree banked turns, and there are not going to be any complaints from passengers in Business Class that the flight crew spilled their gin and tonic!
answered Mar 28 at 22:06
alephzeroalephzero
1,721412
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
Even most light piston aircraft have no problem with 60 degree banked turns. It's just 2 Gs if you hold altitude. That's nothing for a fighter.
$endgroup$
– reirab
Mar 28 at 22:58
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Different air forces may operate with different conventions, but right from basic flight training the RAF classifies banked turns of 20 degrees as "gentle," 40 as "medium" and 60 as "steep," and the most commonly used are "medium".
Ref: The RAF Basic Flying Manual (1952 edition) - https://www.t6harvard.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Chapter-3.pdf page 26-27.
The video is just a 40 degree banked turn.
The aircraft have no problem handling the G loads in 60 degree banked turns, and there are not going to be any complaints from passengers in Business Class that the flight crew spilled their gin and tonic!
answered Mar 28 at 22:06
alephzeroalephzero
1,721412
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
Even most light piston aircraft have no problem with 60 degree banked turns. It's just 2 Gs if you hold altitude. That's nothing for a fighter.
$endgroup$
– reirab
Mar 28 at 22:58
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Different air forces may operate with different conventions, but right from basic flight training the RAF classifies banked turns of 20 degrees as "gentle," 40 as "medium" and 60 as "steep," and the most commonly used are "medium".
Ref: The RAF Basic Flying Manual (1952 edition) - https://www.t6harvard.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Chapter-3.pdf page 26-27.
The video is just a 40 degree banked turn.
The aircraft have no problem handling the G loads in 60 degree banked turns, and there are not going to be any complaints from passengers in Business Class that the flight crew spilled their gin and tonic!
answered Mar 28 at 22:06
alephzeroalephzero
1,721412
$endgroup$
Different air forces may operate with different conventions, but right from basic flight training the RAF classifies banked turns of 20 degrees as "gentle," 40 as "medium" and 60 as "steep," and the most commonly used are "medium".
Ref: The RAF Basic Flying Manual (1952 edition) - https://www.t6harvard.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Chapter-3.pdf page 26-27.
The video is just a 40 degree banked turn.
The aircraft have no problem handling the G loads in 60 degree banked turns, and there are not going to be any complaints from passengers in Business Class that the flight crew spilled their gin and tonic!
answered Mar 28 at 22:06
alephzeroalephzero
1,721412
answered Mar 28 at 22:06
alephzeroalephzero
1,721412
answered Mar 28 at 22:06
alephzeroalephzero
1,721412
answered Mar 28 at 22:06
alephzeroalephzero
1,721412
1,721412
3
$begingroup$
Even most light piston aircraft have no problem with 60 degree banked turns. It's just 2 Gs if you hold altitude. That's nothing for a fighter.
$endgroup$
– reirab
Mar 28 at 22:58
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
Even most light piston aircraft have no problem with 60 degree banked turns. It's just 2 Gs if you hold altitude. That's nothing for a fighter.
$endgroup$
– reirab
Mar 28 at 22:58
3
3
$begingroup$
Even most light piston aircraft have no problem with 60 degree banked turns. It's just 2 Gs if you hold altitude. That's nothing for a fighter.
$endgroup$
– reirab
Mar 28 at 22:58
$begingroup$
Even most light piston aircraft have no problem with 60 degree banked turns. It's just 2 Gs if you hold altitude. That's nothing for a fighter.
$endgroup$
– reirab
Mar 28 at 22:58
add a comment |
$begingroup$
They do this because there are 3 main parts to an air to air refuel:
- port observation where they wait to be refueled in a line.
- refuel area where they actually get refueled.
- reform area where they wait for the rest of the squadron.
After the refuel, they will bank the right to go to the reform area and will wait for the rest of there squadron. Once everyone is refueled then they break from the tanker.
answered Mar 29 at 23:08
Zac CallaghanZac Callaghan
168110
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
They do this because there are 3 main parts to an air to air refuel:
- port observation where they wait to be refueled in a line.
- refuel area where they actually get refueled.
- reform area where they wait for the rest of the squadron.
After the refuel, they will bank the right to go to the reform area and will wait for the rest of there squadron. Once everyone is refueled then they break from the tanker.
answered Mar 29 at 23:08
Zac CallaghanZac Callaghan
168110
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
They do this because there are 3 main parts to an air to air refuel:
- port observation where they wait to be refueled in a line.
- refuel area where they actually get refueled.
- reform area where they wait for the rest of the squadron.
After the refuel, they will bank the right to go to the reform area and will wait for the rest of there squadron. Once everyone is refueled then they break from the tanker.
answered Mar 29 at 23:08
Zac CallaghanZac Callaghan
168110
$endgroup$
They do this because there are 3 main parts to an air to air refuel:
- port observation where they wait to be refueled in a line.
- refuel area where they actually get refueled.
- reform area where they wait for the rest of the squadron.
After the refuel, they will bank the right to go to the reform area and will wait for the rest of there squadron. Once everyone is refueled then they break from the tanker.
answered Mar 29 at 23:08
Zac CallaghanZac Callaghan
168110
answered Mar 29 at 23:08
Zac CallaghanZac Callaghan
168110
answered Mar 29 at 23:08
Zac CallaghanZac Callaghan
168110
answered Mar 29 at 23:08
Zac CallaghanZac Callaghan
168110
168110
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A jet joins on one side of the tanker then when its turn comes moves behind to tank then when finished, clears off to the other side. Bear in mind a whole formation may be tanking and need to flow through the same process. The turn after tanking is not a hard turn in fast jet terms.
answered Mar 29 at 8:13
DerekDerek
791
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
many people have already explained
$endgroup$
– Zac Callaghan
Apr 3 at 3:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A jet joins on one side of the tanker then when its turn comes moves behind to tank then when finished, clears off to the other side. Bear in mind a whole formation may be tanking and need to flow through the same process. The turn after tanking is not a hard turn in fast jet terms.
answered Mar 29 at 8:13
DerekDerek
791
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
many people have already explained
$endgroup$
– Zac Callaghan
Apr 3 at 3:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A jet joins on one side of the tanker then when its turn comes moves behind to tank then when finished, clears off to the other side. Bear in mind a whole formation may be tanking and need to flow through the same process. The turn after tanking is not a hard turn in fast jet terms.
answered Mar 29 at 8:13
DerekDerek
791
$endgroup$
A jet joins on one side of the tanker then when its turn comes moves behind to tank then when finished, clears off to the other side. Bear in mind a whole formation may be tanking and need to flow through the same process. The turn after tanking is not a hard turn in fast jet terms.
answered Mar 29 at 8:13
DerekDerek
791
answered Mar 29 at 8:13
DerekDerek
791
answered Mar 29 at 8:13
DerekDerek
791
answered Mar 29 at 8:13
DerekDerek
791
791
$begingroup$
many people have already explained
$endgroup$
– Zac Callaghan
Apr 3 at 3:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
many people have already explained
$endgroup$
– Zac Callaghan
Apr 3 at 3:46
$begingroup$
many people have already explained
$endgroup$
– Zac Callaghan
Apr 3 at 3:46
$begingroup$
many people have already explained
$endgroup$
– Zac Callaghan
Apr 3 at 3:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Others seem to have answered the why such a sharp maneuver part of the question, so I will answer the why to the right part. Collision avoidance in aircraft is always by turning to the right when possible. Keeping the formation in such a way that the pilot can always escape to the right is probably done to ensure safety, as it lines up with the engrained training.
answered Mar 29 at 19:37
XRFXRF
3285
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Others seem to have answered the why such a sharp maneuver part of the question, so I will answer the why to the right part. Collision avoidance in aircraft is always by turning to the right when possible. Keeping the formation in such a way that the pilot can always escape to the right is probably done to ensure safety, as it lines up with the engrained training.
answered Mar 29 at 19:37
XRFXRF
3285
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Others seem to have answered the why such a sharp maneuver part of the question, so I will answer the why to the right part. Collision avoidance in aircraft is always by turning to the right when possible. Keeping the formation in such a way that the pilot can always escape to the right is probably done to ensure safety, as it lines up with the engrained training.
answered Mar 29 at 19:37
XRFXRF
3285
$endgroup$
Others seem to have answered the why such a sharp maneuver part of the question, so I will answer the why to the right part. Collision avoidance in aircraft is always by turning to the right when possible. Keeping the formation in such a way that the pilot can always escape to the right is probably done to ensure safety, as it lines up with the engrained training.
answered Mar 29 at 19:37
XRFXRF
3285
answered Mar 29 at 19:37
XRFXRF
3285
answered Mar 29 at 19:37
XRFXRF
3285
answered Mar 29 at 19:37
XRFXRF
3285
3285
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Two aircraft must either be flying in formation, or be far apart, to be safe. While the fighter is in the process of leaving the tanker, it is neither. It therefore moves away quickly using the standard breakaway manoeuvre. Bank really sharply? The video showed a positively leisurely turn in the circumstances.
Why to the right? It's standard to approach on the left side of the tanker. That's where other fighters waiting and approaching to refuel will be, so the left is a good side to avoid.
answered Mar 29 at 15:31
Neil_UKNeil_UK
21914
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I agree it was leisurely, but "leisurely" and "breakaway" don't go together...
$endgroup$
– Michael Hall
Mar 29 at 19:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Two aircraft must either be flying in formation, or be far apart, to be safe. While the fighter is in the process of leaving the tanker, it is neither. It therefore moves away quickly using the standard breakaway manoeuvre. Bank really sharply? The video showed a positively leisurely turn in the circumstances.
Why to the right? It's standard to approach on the left side of the tanker. That's where other fighters waiting and approaching to refuel will be, so the left is a good side to avoid.
answered Mar 29 at 15:31
Neil_UKNeil_UK
21914
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I agree it was leisurely, but "leisurely" and "breakaway" don't go together...
$endgroup$
– Michael Hall
Mar 29 at 19:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Two aircraft must either be flying in formation, or be far apart, to be safe. While the fighter is in the process of leaving the tanker, it is neither. It therefore moves away quickly using the standard breakaway manoeuvre. Bank really sharply? The video showed a positively leisurely turn in the circumstances.
Why to the right? It's standard to approach on the left side of the tanker. That's where other fighters waiting and approaching to refuel will be, so the left is a good side to avoid.
answered Mar 29 at 15:31
Neil_UKNeil_UK
21914
$endgroup$
Two aircraft must either be flying in formation, or be far apart, to be safe. While the fighter is in the process of leaving the tanker, it is neither. It therefore moves away quickly using the standard breakaway manoeuvre. Bank really sharply? The video showed a positively leisurely turn in the circumstances.
Why to the right? It's standard to approach on the left side of the tanker. That's where other fighters waiting and approaching to refuel will be, so the left is a good side to avoid.
answered Mar 29 at 15:31
Neil_UKNeil_UK
21914
answered Mar 29 at 15:31
Neil_UKNeil_UK
21914
answered Mar 29 at 15:31
Neil_UKNeil_UK
21914
answered Mar 29 at 15:31
Neil_UKNeil_UK
21914
21914
$begingroup$
I agree it was leisurely, but "leisurely" and "breakaway" don't go together...
$endgroup$
– Michael Hall
Mar 29 at 19:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I agree it was leisurely, but "leisurely" and "breakaway" don't go together...
$endgroup$
– Michael Hall
Mar 29 at 19:05
$begingroup$
I agree it was leisurely, but "leisurely" and "breakaway" don't go together...
$endgroup$
– Michael Hall
Mar 29 at 19:05
$begingroup$
I agree it was leisurely, but "leisurely" and "breakaway" don't go together...
$endgroup$
– Michael Hall
Mar 29 at 19:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To gain as much seperation as quickly as possible.
answered Mar 28 at 20:36
WindshearWindshear
2834
$endgroup$
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To gain as much seperation as quickly as possible.
answered Mar 28 at 20:36
WindshearWindshear
2834
$endgroup$
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To gain as much seperation as quickly as possible.
answered Mar 28 at 20:36
WindshearWindshear
2834
$endgroup$
To gain as much seperation as quickly as possible.
answered Mar 28 at 20:36
WindshearWindshear
2834
answered Mar 28 at 20:36
WindshearWindshear
2834
answered Mar 28 at 20:36
WindshearWindshear
2834
answered Mar 28 at 20:36
WindshearWindshear
2834
2834
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Aviation Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f61735%2fwhy-do-airplanes-bank-sharply-to-the-right-after-air-to-air-refueling%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
27
$begingroup$
Rule Of Cool. Normally they do a barrel roll.
$endgroup$
– Harper
Mar 28 at 22:17
12
$begingroup$
I don't see "sharply" TBH
$endgroup$
– Mayou36
Mar 29 at 9:41
1
$begingroup$
@mayou36 it is subjective. What is 'sharply' for a landlubber layman might be a soft bank for an airborn flyer. Who knows? I don't. Unless math gets involved and we define the 'sharply' threshold, it is fine to use these terms IMHO
$endgroup$
– Mindwin
Mar 29 at 12:20
3
$begingroup$
The point is, there's nothing abnormal about what's happening here, which is what OP is suggesting.
$endgroup$
– zymhan
Mar 29 at 15:51
5
$begingroup$
The premise of the question is wrong. That's not a "really sharp" bank. It's both shallow and slow; especially if you think in terms of a fighter jet. I would argue that the bank is not "sharp" even for a recreational aircraft.
$endgroup$
– Martin Argerami
Mar 29 at 18:34