Is there a RAID 0 Equivalent for RAM?What's the difference between RAID 1 software mirroring and Fake RAID?Can someone explain RAID-0 in plain English?Lost RAID after bootRAID striping on a desktop machineRAID 1+0 on Windows 7 Professional after installationSoftware RAID 0 under Window 7 on 2 HDD only (including system drive) - is it possibleWindows 10 Storage Spaces Poor SpeedIs there a RAID mode that allows files to be on one physical drive of the array?Creating a “virtual” RAID 0 on top of two drives in Windows?Is this explanation of RAID striping incorrect?
Large drywall patch supports
How can I quit an app using Terminal?
Trouble understanding the speech of overseas colleagues
What is the best translation for "slot" in the context of multiplayer video games?
Is there a problem with hiding "forgot password" until it's needed?
How does buying out courses with grant money work?
Is HostGator storing my password in plaintext?
Tiptoe or tiphoof? Adjusting words to better fit fantasy races
Two monoidal structures and copowering
Is `x >> pure y` equivalent to `liftM (const y) x`
I'm in charge of equipment buying but no one's ever happy with what I choose. How to fix this?
Why Were Madagascar and New Zealand Discovered So Late?
Applicability of Single Responsibility Principle
Energy of the particles in the particle accelerator
Why are there no referendums in the US?
Is this apparent Class Action settlement a spam message?
Valid Badminton Score?
How to write papers efficiently when English isn't my first language?
when is out of tune ok?
Efficient way to transport a Stargate
Why does indent disappear in lists?
How do scammers retract money, while you can’t?
Can the discrete variable be a negative number?
Flow chart document symbol
Is there a RAID 0 Equivalent for RAM?
What's the difference between RAID 1 software mirroring and Fake RAID?Can someone explain RAID-0 in plain English?Lost RAID after bootRAID striping on a desktop machineRAID 1+0 on Windows 7 Professional after installationSoftware RAID 0 under Window 7 on 2 HDD only (including system drive) - is it possibleWindows 10 Storage Spaces Poor SpeedIs there a RAID mode that allows files to be on one physical drive of the array?Creating a “virtual” RAID 0 on top of two drives in Windows?Is this explanation of RAID striping incorrect?
With hard drives, you can put them in a RAID 0 configuration to split data between drives to increase read and write speed. Is there an equivalent of this for RAM? If I have 16 GB of memory, for instance, can I split it into 2 8GB sections and implement striping across them? Note: I am not talking about using ramdisks at all. I am not trying to treat ram as hard drives but rather to speed it up. I have heard that there is a RAID 1 equivalent for RAM called mirroring, but I have not heard of a RAID 0 equivalent.
memory raid raid-0
asked Mar 20 at 20:49
kloddantkloddant
30725
add a comment |
With hard drives, you can put them in a RAID 0 configuration to split data between drives to increase read and write speed. Is there an equivalent of this for RAM? If I have 16 GB of memory, for instance, can I split it into 2 8GB sections and implement striping across them? Note: I am not talking about using ramdisks at all. I am not trying to treat ram as hard drives but rather to speed it up. I have heard that there is a RAID 1 equivalent for RAM called mirroring, but I have not heard of a RAID 0 equivalent.
memory raid raid-0
asked Mar 20 at 20:49
kloddantkloddant
30725
10
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interleaved_memory
– oakad
Mar 21 at 4:10
2
You may need to look into benchmarks for this method FYI, SSD's and RAM sticks usually don't benefit from RAID configurations like HDD's do. I'm doubtful that RAM will see any speed up that's worth halving the amount of RAM you have.
– SupaJord
Mar 21 at 15:59
add a comment |
With hard drives, you can put them in a RAID 0 configuration to split data between drives to increase read and write speed. Is there an equivalent of this for RAM? If I have 16 GB of memory, for instance, can I split it into 2 8GB sections and implement striping across them? Note: I am not talking about using ramdisks at all. I am not trying to treat ram as hard drives but rather to speed it up. I have heard that there is a RAID 1 equivalent for RAM called mirroring, but I have not heard of a RAID 0 equivalent.
memory raid raid-0
asked Mar 20 at 20:49
kloddantkloddant
30725
With hard drives, you can put them in a RAID 0 configuration to split data between drives to increase read and write speed. Is there an equivalent of this for RAM? If I have 16 GB of memory, for instance, can I split it into 2 8GB sections and implement striping across them? Note: I am not talking about using ramdisks at all. I am not trying to treat ram as hard drives but rather to speed it up. I have heard that there is a RAID 1 equivalent for RAM called mirroring, but I have not heard of a RAID 0 equivalent.
memory raid raid-0
memory raid raid-0
asked Mar 20 at 20:49
kloddantkloddant
30725
asked Mar 20 at 20:49
kloddantkloddant
30725
asked Mar 20 at 20:49
kloddantkloddant
30725
asked Mar 20 at 20:49
kloddantkloddant
30725
asked Mar 20 at 20:49
kloddantkloddant
30725
30725
10
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interleaved_memory
– oakad
Mar 21 at 4:10
2
You may need to look into benchmarks for this method FYI, SSD's and RAM sticks usually don't benefit from RAID configurations like HDD's do. I'm doubtful that RAM will see any speed up that's worth halving the amount of RAM you have.
– SupaJord
Mar 21 at 15:59
add a comment |
10
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interleaved_memory
– oakad
Mar 21 at 4:10
2
You may need to look into benchmarks for this method FYI, SSD's and RAM sticks usually don't benefit from RAID configurations like HDD's do. I'm doubtful that RAM will see any speed up that's worth halving the amount of RAM you have.
– SupaJord
Mar 21 at 15:59
10
10
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interleaved_memory
– oakad
Mar 21 at 4:10
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interleaved_memory
– oakad
Mar 21 at 4:10
2
2
You may need to look into benchmarks for this method FYI, SSD's and RAM sticks usually don't benefit from RAID configurations like HDD's do. I'm doubtful that RAM will see any speed up that's worth halving the amount of RAM you have.
– SupaJord
Mar 21 at 15:59
You may need to look into benchmarks for this method FYI, SSD's and RAM sticks usually don't benefit from RAID configurations like HDD's do. I'm doubtful that RAM will see any speed up that's worth halving the amount of RAM you have.
– SupaJord
Mar 21 at 15:59
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
Dual-channel.
Consumer-grade computers have supported this for years now. You don't have to enable it explicitly, but you have to install RAM sticks into the correct slots. Those are usually color coded, but there's no standard for this: some manufacturers mark slots on the same channel with the same color (so for dual-channel you have to use different colored slots), some use same color for slots that will enable dual-channel. Long story short, check with the manual.
Server-grade motherboards can support triple-channel or even quad-channel if the CPU can support it too. (see the comment by J...)
edited Mar 22 at 15:12
Aserre
1033
answered Mar 21 at 7:04
gronostajgronostaj
29k1472108
16
The CPU must also support n-channel RAM to use it. Some motherboards which support quad-channel, for example, can also accomodate processor SKUs which do not. An i7-7740X in an X299 mobo is an example where the board supports quad channel but the CPU only dual.
– J...
Mar 21 at 11:12
1
They're up to 6 channels now on the Scalable Xeon, 8 on EPYC, and up to 32 on Power9
– user71659
Mar 23 at 18:52
add a comment |
It's called interleaving. Simple implementations use two banks of RAM (two separate RAM sticks) but I've seen motherboards with up to four banks interleaved.
Like Raid 0, it exploits the fact that the CPU is often much faster than RAM and that there are lots of instances where you are basically streaming data to and from RAM. The memory controller allows the CPU to initiate the next write without waiting for the current write to complete.
For reads it works a bit like DMA where the memory controller will be told to prefetch the next values from RAM before the current data read is complete.
answered Mar 21 at 9:41
slebetmanslebetman
51729
Note that this is not something that you normally can just enable. If and when you use motherboards that support this feature you typically must install RAM of the same size and type in specific paired slots.
– slebetman
Mar 21 at 9:43
1
@kloddant Neither RAID-0 (striping), nor multi-channel, nor interleaving decrease amount of available memory, because there is no redundancy (unlike in higher RAIDs).
– gronostaj
Mar 21 at 14:50
1
This is very low-level and must be implemented directly on RAM modules, right?
– gronostaj
Mar 21 at 14:51
2
Not RAM modules. Typically these systems use standard RAM available at the time. What's needed is support from the motherboard and depending on the architecture the CPU (older systems with external memory controllers used to use generic CPUs but a lot of modern systems have integrated the memory controller)
– slebetman
Mar 22 at 2:57
2
@kloddant: No, you still have the total amount of RAM. The hardware just addresses them differently from what the CPU thinks of as memory. For example, the first RAM stick will hold all even addressed data: 0x00000000, 0x00000002, 0x00003284 and another stick will hold all odd addressed data: 0x00000001, 0x00000003, 0x00003285 etc.
– slebetman
Mar 22 at 3:00
|
show 1 more comment
Yes, there's indeed an equivalent. But generally you just need to follow the instructions for your motherboard when adding RAM, and the setup will be automatic.
Technically this depends on your CPU, but in practice all CPU's that fit in the socket of your motherboard will use the same interface to RAM.
answered Mar 20 at 20:59
MSaltersMSalters
7,47711725
add a comment |
As the other answers have covered, this has already been available for over a decade.
The Core i7-920 was launched in Q4 2008 and supported tri-channel memory. https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/37148/intel-core-i7-940-processor-8m-cache-2-93-ghz-4-80-gt-s-intel-qpi.html
What the other answers do not cover is that 99% of people will not notice a difference. The biggest advantage for the average user is that dual-channel (or better) memory configurations help noticeably in gaming performance when using an:
- integrated GPU - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_2Z208nDGE
- dedicated GPU - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-k5wA7EFwpo
If you look up specs for LGA 775 motherboards then you will find dual-channel support going back even further such as https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=9SIA4RE8205361
answered Mar 21 at 14:55
MonkeyZeusMonkeyZeus
4,82131736
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "3"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1415781%2fis-there-a-raid-0-equivalent-for-ram%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Dual-channel.
Consumer-grade computers have supported this for years now. You don't have to enable it explicitly, but you have to install RAM sticks into the correct slots. Those are usually color coded, but there's no standard for this: some manufacturers mark slots on the same channel with the same color (so for dual-channel you have to use different colored slots), some use same color for slots that will enable dual-channel. Long story short, check with the manual.
Server-grade motherboards can support triple-channel or even quad-channel if the CPU can support it too. (see the comment by J...)
edited Mar 22 at 15:12
Aserre
1033
answered Mar 21 at 7:04
gronostajgronostaj
29k1472108
16
The CPU must also support n-channel RAM to use it. Some motherboards which support quad-channel, for example, can also accomodate processor SKUs which do not. An i7-7740X in an X299 mobo is an example where the board supports quad channel but the CPU only dual.
– J...
Mar 21 at 11:12
1
They're up to 6 channels now on the Scalable Xeon, 8 on EPYC, and up to 32 on Power9
– user71659
Mar 23 at 18:52
add a comment |
Dual-channel.
Consumer-grade computers have supported this for years now. You don't have to enable it explicitly, but you have to install RAM sticks into the correct slots. Those are usually color coded, but there's no standard for this: some manufacturers mark slots on the same channel with the same color (so for dual-channel you have to use different colored slots), some use same color for slots that will enable dual-channel. Long story short, check with the manual.
Server-grade motherboards can support triple-channel or even quad-channel if the CPU can support it too. (see the comment by J...)
edited Mar 22 at 15:12
Aserre
1033
answered Mar 21 at 7:04
gronostajgronostaj
29k1472108
16
The CPU must also support n-channel RAM to use it. Some motherboards which support quad-channel, for example, can also accomodate processor SKUs which do not. An i7-7740X in an X299 mobo is an example where the board supports quad channel but the CPU only dual.
– J...
Mar 21 at 11:12
1
They're up to 6 channels now on the Scalable Xeon, 8 on EPYC, and up to 32 on Power9
– user71659
Mar 23 at 18:52
add a comment |
Dual-channel.
Consumer-grade computers have supported this for years now. You don't have to enable it explicitly, but you have to install RAM sticks into the correct slots. Those are usually color coded, but there's no standard for this: some manufacturers mark slots on the same channel with the same color (so for dual-channel you have to use different colored slots), some use same color for slots that will enable dual-channel. Long story short, check with the manual.
Server-grade motherboards can support triple-channel or even quad-channel if the CPU can support it too. (see the comment by J...)
edited Mar 22 at 15:12
Aserre
1033
answered Mar 21 at 7:04
gronostajgronostaj
29k1472108
Dual-channel.
Consumer-grade computers have supported this for years now. You don't have to enable it explicitly, but you have to install RAM sticks into the correct slots. Those are usually color coded, but there's no standard for this: some manufacturers mark slots on the same channel with the same color (so for dual-channel you have to use different colored slots), some use same color for slots that will enable dual-channel. Long story short, check with the manual.
Server-grade motherboards can support triple-channel or even quad-channel if the CPU can support it too. (see the comment by J...)
edited Mar 22 at 15:12
Aserre
1033
answered Mar 21 at 7:04
gronostajgronostaj
29k1472108
edited Mar 22 at 15:12
Aserre
1033
edited Mar 22 at 15:12
Aserre
1033
edited Mar 22 at 15:12
Aserre
1033
1033
answered Mar 21 at 7:04
gronostajgronostaj
29k1472108
answered Mar 21 at 7:04
gronostajgronostaj
29k1472108
answered Mar 21 at 7:04
gronostajgronostaj
29k1472108
29k1472108
16
The CPU must also support n-channel RAM to use it. Some motherboards which support quad-channel, for example, can also accomodate processor SKUs which do not. An i7-7740X in an X299 mobo is an example where the board supports quad channel but the CPU only dual.
– J...
Mar 21 at 11:12
1
They're up to 6 channels now on the Scalable Xeon, 8 on EPYC, and up to 32 on Power9
– user71659
Mar 23 at 18:52
add a comment |
16
The CPU must also support n-channel RAM to use it. Some motherboards which support quad-channel, for example, can also accomodate processor SKUs which do not. An i7-7740X in an X299 mobo is an example where the board supports quad channel but the CPU only dual.
– J...
Mar 21 at 11:12
1
They're up to 6 channels now on the Scalable Xeon, 8 on EPYC, and up to 32 on Power9
– user71659
Mar 23 at 18:52
16
16
The CPU must also support n-channel RAM to use it. Some motherboards which support quad-channel, for example, can also accomodate processor SKUs which do not. An i7-7740X in an X299 mobo is an example where the board supports quad channel but the CPU only dual.
– J...
Mar 21 at 11:12
The CPU must also support n-channel RAM to use it. Some motherboards which support quad-channel, for example, can also accomodate processor SKUs which do not. An i7-7740X in an X299 mobo is an example where the board supports quad channel but the CPU only dual.
– J...
Mar 21 at 11:12
1
1
They're up to 6 channels now on the Scalable Xeon, 8 on EPYC, and up to 32 on Power9
– user71659
Mar 23 at 18:52
They're up to 6 channels now on the Scalable Xeon, 8 on EPYC, and up to 32 on Power9
– user71659
Mar 23 at 18:52
add a comment |
It's called interleaving. Simple implementations use two banks of RAM (two separate RAM sticks) but I've seen motherboards with up to four banks interleaved.
Like Raid 0, it exploits the fact that the CPU is often much faster than RAM and that there are lots of instances where you are basically streaming data to and from RAM. The memory controller allows the CPU to initiate the next write without waiting for the current write to complete.
For reads it works a bit like DMA where the memory controller will be told to prefetch the next values from RAM before the current data read is complete.
answered Mar 21 at 9:41
slebetmanslebetman
51729
Note that this is not something that you normally can just enable. If and when you use motherboards that support this feature you typically must install RAM of the same size and type in specific paired slots.
– slebetman
Mar 21 at 9:43
1
@kloddant Neither RAID-0 (striping), nor multi-channel, nor interleaving decrease amount of available memory, because there is no redundancy (unlike in higher RAIDs).
– gronostaj
Mar 21 at 14:50
1
This is very low-level and must be implemented directly on RAM modules, right?
– gronostaj
Mar 21 at 14:51
2
Not RAM modules. Typically these systems use standard RAM available at the time. What's needed is support from the motherboard and depending on the architecture the CPU (older systems with external memory controllers used to use generic CPUs but a lot of modern systems have integrated the memory controller)
– slebetman
Mar 22 at 2:57
2
@kloddant: No, you still have the total amount of RAM. The hardware just addresses them differently from what the CPU thinks of as memory. For example, the first RAM stick will hold all even addressed data: 0x00000000, 0x00000002, 0x00003284 and another stick will hold all odd addressed data: 0x00000001, 0x00000003, 0x00003285 etc.
– slebetman
Mar 22 at 3:00
|
show 1 more comment
It's called interleaving. Simple implementations use two banks of RAM (two separate RAM sticks) but I've seen motherboards with up to four banks interleaved.
Like Raid 0, it exploits the fact that the CPU is often much faster than RAM and that there are lots of instances where you are basically streaming data to and from RAM. The memory controller allows the CPU to initiate the next write without waiting for the current write to complete.
For reads it works a bit like DMA where the memory controller will be told to prefetch the next values from RAM before the current data read is complete.
answered Mar 21 at 9:41
slebetmanslebetman
51729
Note that this is not something that you normally can just enable. If and when you use motherboards that support this feature you typically must install RAM of the same size and type in specific paired slots.
– slebetman
Mar 21 at 9:43
1
@kloddant Neither RAID-0 (striping), nor multi-channel, nor interleaving decrease amount of available memory, because there is no redundancy (unlike in higher RAIDs).
– gronostaj
Mar 21 at 14:50
1
This is very low-level and must be implemented directly on RAM modules, right?
– gronostaj
Mar 21 at 14:51
2
Not RAM modules. Typically these systems use standard RAM available at the time. What's needed is support from the motherboard and depending on the architecture the CPU (older systems with external memory controllers used to use generic CPUs but a lot of modern systems have integrated the memory controller)
– slebetman
Mar 22 at 2:57
2
@kloddant: No, you still have the total amount of RAM. The hardware just addresses them differently from what the CPU thinks of as memory. For example, the first RAM stick will hold all even addressed data: 0x00000000, 0x00000002, 0x00003284 and another stick will hold all odd addressed data: 0x00000001, 0x00000003, 0x00003285 etc.
– slebetman
Mar 22 at 3:00
|
show 1 more comment
It's called interleaving. Simple implementations use two banks of RAM (two separate RAM sticks) but I've seen motherboards with up to four banks interleaved.
Like Raid 0, it exploits the fact that the CPU is often much faster than RAM and that there are lots of instances where you are basically streaming data to and from RAM. The memory controller allows the CPU to initiate the next write without waiting for the current write to complete.
For reads it works a bit like DMA where the memory controller will be told to prefetch the next values from RAM before the current data read is complete.
answered Mar 21 at 9:41
slebetmanslebetman
51729
It's called interleaving. Simple implementations use two banks of RAM (two separate RAM sticks) but I've seen motherboards with up to four banks interleaved.
Like Raid 0, it exploits the fact that the CPU is often much faster than RAM and that there are lots of instances where you are basically streaming data to and from RAM. The memory controller allows the CPU to initiate the next write without waiting for the current write to complete.
For reads it works a bit like DMA where the memory controller will be told to prefetch the next values from RAM before the current data read is complete.
answered Mar 21 at 9:41
slebetmanslebetman
51729
answered Mar 21 at 9:41
slebetmanslebetman
51729
answered Mar 21 at 9:41
slebetmanslebetman
51729
answered Mar 21 at 9:41
slebetmanslebetman
51729
51729
Note that this is not something that you normally can just enable. If and when you use motherboards that support this feature you typically must install RAM of the same size and type in specific paired slots.
– slebetman
Mar 21 at 9:43
1
@kloddant Neither RAID-0 (striping), nor multi-channel, nor interleaving decrease amount of available memory, because there is no redundancy (unlike in higher RAIDs).
– gronostaj
Mar 21 at 14:50
1
This is very low-level and must be implemented directly on RAM modules, right?
– gronostaj
Mar 21 at 14:51
2
Not RAM modules. Typically these systems use standard RAM available at the time. What's needed is support from the motherboard and depending on the architecture the CPU (older systems with external memory controllers used to use generic CPUs but a lot of modern systems have integrated the memory controller)
– slebetman
Mar 22 at 2:57
2
@kloddant: No, you still have the total amount of RAM. The hardware just addresses them differently from what the CPU thinks of as memory. For example, the first RAM stick will hold all even addressed data: 0x00000000, 0x00000002, 0x00003284 and another stick will hold all odd addressed data: 0x00000001, 0x00000003, 0x00003285 etc.
– slebetman
Mar 22 at 3:00
|
show 1 more comment
Note that this is not something that you normally can just enable. If and when you use motherboards that support this feature you typically must install RAM of the same size and type in specific paired slots.
– slebetman
Mar 21 at 9:43
1
@kloddant Neither RAID-0 (striping), nor multi-channel, nor interleaving decrease amount of available memory, because there is no redundancy (unlike in higher RAIDs).
– gronostaj
Mar 21 at 14:50
1
This is very low-level and must be implemented directly on RAM modules, right?
– gronostaj
Mar 21 at 14:51
2
Not RAM modules. Typically these systems use standard RAM available at the time. What's needed is support from the motherboard and depending on the architecture the CPU (older systems with external memory controllers used to use generic CPUs but a lot of modern systems have integrated the memory controller)
– slebetman
Mar 22 at 2:57
2
@kloddant: No, you still have the total amount of RAM. The hardware just addresses them differently from what the CPU thinks of as memory. For example, the first RAM stick will hold all even addressed data: 0x00000000, 0x00000002, 0x00003284 and another stick will hold all odd addressed data: 0x00000001, 0x00000003, 0x00003285 etc.
– slebetman
Mar 22 at 3:00
Note that this is not something that you normally can just enable. If and when you use motherboards that support this feature you typically must install RAM of the same size and type in specific paired slots.
– slebetman
Mar 21 at 9:43
Note that this is not something that you normally can just enable. If and when you use motherboards that support this feature you typically must install RAM of the same size and type in specific paired slots.
– slebetman
Mar 21 at 9:43
1
1
@kloddant Neither RAID-0 (striping), nor multi-channel, nor interleaving decrease amount of available memory, because there is no redundancy (unlike in higher RAIDs).
– gronostaj
Mar 21 at 14:50
@kloddant Neither RAID-0 (striping), nor multi-channel, nor interleaving decrease amount of available memory, because there is no redundancy (unlike in higher RAIDs).
– gronostaj
Mar 21 at 14:50
1
1
This is very low-level and must be implemented directly on RAM modules, right?
– gronostaj
Mar 21 at 14:51
This is very low-level and must be implemented directly on RAM modules, right?
– gronostaj
Mar 21 at 14:51
2
2
Not RAM modules. Typically these systems use standard RAM available at the time. What's needed is support from the motherboard and depending on the architecture the CPU (older systems with external memory controllers used to use generic CPUs but a lot of modern systems have integrated the memory controller)
– slebetman
Mar 22 at 2:57
Not RAM modules. Typically these systems use standard RAM available at the time. What's needed is support from the motherboard and depending on the architecture the CPU (older systems with external memory controllers used to use generic CPUs but a lot of modern systems have integrated the memory controller)
– slebetman
Mar 22 at 2:57
2
2
@kloddant: No, you still have the total amount of RAM. The hardware just addresses them differently from what the CPU thinks of as memory. For example, the first RAM stick will hold all even addressed data: 0x00000000, 0x00000002, 0x00003284 and another stick will hold all odd addressed data: 0x00000001, 0x00000003, 0x00003285 etc.
– slebetman
Mar 22 at 3:00
@kloddant: No, you still have the total amount of RAM. The hardware just addresses them differently from what the CPU thinks of as memory. For example, the first RAM stick will hold all even addressed data: 0x00000000, 0x00000002, 0x00003284 and another stick will hold all odd addressed data: 0x00000001, 0x00000003, 0x00003285 etc.
– slebetman
Mar 22 at 3:00
|
show 1 more comment
Yes, there's indeed an equivalent. But generally you just need to follow the instructions for your motherboard when adding RAM, and the setup will be automatic.
Technically this depends on your CPU, but in practice all CPU's that fit in the socket of your motherboard will use the same interface to RAM.
answered Mar 20 at 20:59
MSaltersMSalters
7,47711725
add a comment |
Yes, there's indeed an equivalent. But generally you just need to follow the instructions for your motherboard when adding RAM, and the setup will be automatic.
Technically this depends on your CPU, but in practice all CPU's that fit in the socket of your motherboard will use the same interface to RAM.
answered Mar 20 at 20:59
MSaltersMSalters
7,47711725
add a comment |
Yes, there's indeed an equivalent. But generally you just need to follow the instructions for your motherboard when adding RAM, and the setup will be automatic.
Technically this depends on your CPU, but in practice all CPU's that fit in the socket of your motherboard will use the same interface to RAM.
answered Mar 20 at 20:59
MSaltersMSalters
7,47711725
Yes, there's indeed an equivalent. But generally you just need to follow the instructions for your motherboard when adding RAM, and the setup will be automatic.
Technically this depends on your CPU, but in practice all CPU's that fit in the socket of your motherboard will use the same interface to RAM.
answered Mar 20 at 20:59
MSaltersMSalters
7,47711725
edited Mar 21 at 9:20
answered Mar 20 at 20:59
MSaltersMSalters
7,47711725
answered Mar 20 at 20:59
MSaltersMSalters
7,47711725
answered Mar 20 at 20:59
MSaltersMSalters
7,47711725
7,47711725
add a comment |
add a comment |
As the other answers have covered, this has already been available for over a decade.
The Core i7-920 was launched in Q4 2008 and supported tri-channel memory. https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/37148/intel-core-i7-940-processor-8m-cache-2-93-ghz-4-80-gt-s-intel-qpi.html
What the other answers do not cover is that 99% of people will not notice a difference. The biggest advantage for the average user is that dual-channel (or better) memory configurations help noticeably in gaming performance when using an:
- integrated GPU - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_2Z208nDGE
- dedicated GPU - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-k5wA7EFwpo
If you look up specs for LGA 775 motherboards then you will find dual-channel support going back even further such as https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=9SIA4RE8205361
answered Mar 21 at 14:55
MonkeyZeusMonkeyZeus
4,82131736
add a comment |
As the other answers have covered, this has already been available for over a decade.
The Core i7-920 was launched in Q4 2008 and supported tri-channel memory. https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/37148/intel-core-i7-940-processor-8m-cache-2-93-ghz-4-80-gt-s-intel-qpi.html
What the other answers do not cover is that 99% of people will not notice a difference. The biggest advantage for the average user is that dual-channel (or better) memory configurations help noticeably in gaming performance when using an:
- integrated GPU - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_2Z208nDGE
- dedicated GPU - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-k5wA7EFwpo
If you look up specs for LGA 775 motherboards then you will find dual-channel support going back even further such as https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=9SIA4RE8205361
answered Mar 21 at 14:55
MonkeyZeusMonkeyZeus
4,82131736
add a comment |
As the other answers have covered, this has already been available for over a decade.
The Core i7-920 was launched in Q4 2008 and supported tri-channel memory. https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/37148/intel-core-i7-940-processor-8m-cache-2-93-ghz-4-80-gt-s-intel-qpi.html
What the other answers do not cover is that 99% of people will not notice a difference. The biggest advantage for the average user is that dual-channel (or better) memory configurations help noticeably in gaming performance when using an:
- integrated GPU - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_2Z208nDGE
- dedicated GPU - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-k5wA7EFwpo
If you look up specs for LGA 775 motherboards then you will find dual-channel support going back even further such as https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=9SIA4RE8205361
answered Mar 21 at 14:55
MonkeyZeusMonkeyZeus
4,82131736
As the other answers have covered, this has already been available for over a decade.
The Core i7-920 was launched in Q4 2008 and supported tri-channel memory. https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/37148/intel-core-i7-940-processor-8m-cache-2-93-ghz-4-80-gt-s-intel-qpi.html
What the other answers do not cover is that 99% of people will not notice a difference. The biggest advantage for the average user is that dual-channel (or better) memory configurations help noticeably in gaming performance when using an:
- integrated GPU - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_2Z208nDGE
- dedicated GPU - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-k5wA7EFwpo
If you look up specs for LGA 775 motherboards then you will find dual-channel support going back even further such as https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=9SIA4RE8205361
answered Mar 21 at 14:55
MonkeyZeusMonkeyZeus
4,82131736
edited Mar 22 at 16:01
answered Mar 21 at 14:55
MonkeyZeusMonkeyZeus
4,82131736
answered Mar 21 at 14:55
MonkeyZeusMonkeyZeus
4,82131736
answered Mar 21 at 14:55
MonkeyZeusMonkeyZeus
4,82131736
4,82131736
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1415781%2fis-there-a-raid-0-equivalent-for-ram%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
10
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interleaved_memory
– oakad
Mar 21 at 4:10
2
You may need to look into benchmarks for this method FYI, SSD's and RAM sticks usually don't benefit from RAID configurations like HDD's do. I'm doubtful that RAM will see any speed up that's worth halving the amount of RAM you have.
– SupaJord
Mar 21 at 15:59