What can I do if I am asked to learn different programming languages very frequently?How can I learn to communicate better with colleagues from another profession?How do I attract candidate developers willing to learn a proprietary language?How do you sell yourself to a company where you will not have all the skills necessary to jump right into the job?What reasons to say when I want to get in a different project?What would you think is better to learn and work considering IT market needs and my experiencesHow to handle a team that does not want you as team lead?How to handle a situation where my job title is not what I thought it was?Employer wants me to learn new language/system - how can I refuse to do this?Convincing manager to change programming languagesemployer asks about my long term plan after me asking for salary raise

Did I make a mistake by ccing email to boss to others?

Can I cause damage to electrical appliances by unplugging them when they are turned on?

Consistent Linux device enumeration

How to predict the next number in a series while having additional series of data that might affect it?

PTIJ: does fasting on Ta'anis Esther give us reward as if we celebrated 2 Purims? (similar to Yom Kippur)

El Dorado Word Puzzle II: Videogame Edition

Asserting that Atheism and Theism are both faith based positions

What is this high flying aircraft over Pennsylvania?

Why does a 97 / 92 key piano exist by Bösendorfer?

Do I have to take mana from my deck or hand when tapping a dual land?

Mimic lecturing on blackboard, facing audience

If Captain Marvel (MCU) marries a human male, will they have human or Kree children?

Adjusting bounding box of PlotLegends in TimelinePlot

Magento Commands Not working

Why the "ls" command is showing the permissions of files in a FAT32 partition?

Should a narrator ever describe things based on a character's view instead of facts?

What does "tick" mean in this sentence?

How to write Quadratic equation with negative coefficient

Typing CO_2 easily

Slur or Tie when they are mixed?

Why is the sun approximated as a black body at ~ 5800 K?

How can I, as DM, avoid the Conga Line of Death occurring when implementing some form of flanking rule?

What happens if a creature's ETB would bounce Thalia, Heretic Cathar?

Storage of electrolytic capacitors - how long?



What can I do if I am asked to learn different programming languages very frequently?


How can I learn to communicate better with colleagues from another profession?How do I attract candidate developers willing to learn a proprietary language?How do you sell yourself to a company where you will not have all the skills necessary to jump right into the job?What reasons to say when I want to get in a different project?What would you think is better to learn and work considering IT market needs and my experiencesHow to handle a team that does not want you as team lead?How to handle a situation where my job title is not what I thought it was?Employer wants me to learn new language/system - how can I refuse to do this?Convincing manager to change programming languagesemployer asks about my long term plan after me asking for salary raise













32















  • I am a software developer and I know languages like Java, JavaScript.

  • A few days ago my project manager asked to learn some other language
    to work on services related to those language. It took me few days and
    I learned it but I didn't got any work related to that language

  • Now after few days gap my project manager asked me to learn another language and
    assigned some work related to this language.

Problems



  1. The promotion round just ended and they have not given me promotion.

  2. I am not able to tell them NO because I am in a very low position (just
    an associate while they are a manager!)

  3. I am not interested to learn those language which they told me, I
    don't want to be jack of all trades and king of none. Instead I want to be
    better in what I know.

Edit:- I am not against learning new things which are beneficial to them, the point is I am trading off my time for developing skills beneficial for them and not for my career ..I think if I will spend more time in the languages I know which are right now in good demand in this industry I can get better opportunity and pay.



I know these managers are making work out of me as their business needs, otherwise they would have to hire more developers who has that specific skills, in other words, i am in one way playing polyglot role and cutting the cost of this project.



Now, with the given scenarios, what can i do to receive appreciation and hike/promotion if i continue to be working like this and learning new languages as per as business needs ?



Note my manager is not a developer and they have very limited knowledge on development work and especially those languages which they asked me to learn.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Shivendra Gupta is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 5





    We cannot answer "what should I do" questions here, as that choice is always up to you. What do you want the result of your interactions with your manager to be? Them stopping to ask you to learn new languages?

    – Erik
    Mar 17 at 8:20






  • 65





    I really don't understand why asking you to learn new languages is not showing you respect. It's saying you are someone who has the ability to learn new skills and isn't stuck in a rut.

    – Philip Kendall
    Mar 17 at 8:42






  • 1





    @ShivendraGupta That is highly significant

    – Gregory Currie
    Mar 17 at 8:53






  • 2





    How long have you worked there?

    – Gregory Currie
    Mar 17 at 9:02






  • 1





    I'm getting the feeling the real issue here is the lack of promotion, not the new languages?

    – Philip Kendall
    Mar 17 at 9:07















32















  • I am a software developer and I know languages like Java, JavaScript.

  • A few days ago my project manager asked to learn some other language
    to work on services related to those language. It took me few days and
    I learned it but I didn't got any work related to that language

  • Now after few days gap my project manager asked me to learn another language and
    assigned some work related to this language.

Problems



  1. The promotion round just ended and they have not given me promotion.

  2. I am not able to tell them NO because I am in a very low position (just
    an associate while they are a manager!)

  3. I am not interested to learn those language which they told me, I
    don't want to be jack of all trades and king of none. Instead I want to be
    better in what I know.

Edit:- I am not against learning new things which are beneficial to them, the point is I am trading off my time for developing skills beneficial for them and not for my career ..I think if I will spend more time in the languages I know which are right now in good demand in this industry I can get better opportunity and pay.



I know these managers are making work out of me as their business needs, otherwise they would have to hire more developers who has that specific skills, in other words, i am in one way playing polyglot role and cutting the cost of this project.



Now, with the given scenarios, what can i do to receive appreciation and hike/promotion if i continue to be working like this and learning new languages as per as business needs ?



Note my manager is not a developer and they have very limited knowledge on development work and especially those languages which they asked me to learn.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Shivendra Gupta is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 5





    We cannot answer "what should I do" questions here, as that choice is always up to you. What do you want the result of your interactions with your manager to be? Them stopping to ask you to learn new languages?

    – Erik
    Mar 17 at 8:20






  • 65





    I really don't understand why asking you to learn new languages is not showing you respect. It's saying you are someone who has the ability to learn new skills and isn't stuck in a rut.

    – Philip Kendall
    Mar 17 at 8:42






  • 1





    @ShivendraGupta That is highly significant

    – Gregory Currie
    Mar 17 at 8:53






  • 2





    How long have you worked there?

    – Gregory Currie
    Mar 17 at 9:02






  • 1





    I'm getting the feeling the real issue here is the lack of promotion, not the new languages?

    – Philip Kendall
    Mar 17 at 9:07













32












32








32


4






  • I am a software developer and I know languages like Java, JavaScript.

  • A few days ago my project manager asked to learn some other language
    to work on services related to those language. It took me few days and
    I learned it but I didn't got any work related to that language

  • Now after few days gap my project manager asked me to learn another language and
    assigned some work related to this language.

Problems



  1. The promotion round just ended and they have not given me promotion.

  2. I am not able to tell them NO because I am in a very low position (just
    an associate while they are a manager!)

  3. I am not interested to learn those language which they told me, I
    don't want to be jack of all trades and king of none. Instead I want to be
    better in what I know.

Edit:- I am not against learning new things which are beneficial to them, the point is I am trading off my time for developing skills beneficial for them and not for my career ..I think if I will spend more time in the languages I know which are right now in good demand in this industry I can get better opportunity and pay.



I know these managers are making work out of me as their business needs, otherwise they would have to hire more developers who has that specific skills, in other words, i am in one way playing polyglot role and cutting the cost of this project.



Now, with the given scenarios, what can i do to receive appreciation and hike/promotion if i continue to be working like this and learning new languages as per as business needs ?



Note my manager is not a developer and they have very limited knowledge on development work and especially those languages which they asked me to learn.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Shivendra Gupta is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • I am a software developer and I know languages like Java, JavaScript.

  • A few days ago my project manager asked to learn some other language
    to work on services related to those language. It took me few days and
    I learned it but I didn't got any work related to that language

  • Now after few days gap my project manager asked me to learn another language and
    assigned some work related to this language.

Problems



  1. The promotion round just ended and they have not given me promotion.

  2. I am not able to tell them NO because I am in a very low position (just
    an associate while they are a manager!)

  3. I am not interested to learn those language which they told me, I
    don't want to be jack of all trades and king of none. Instead I want to be
    better in what I know.

Edit:- I am not against learning new things which are beneficial to them, the point is I am trading off my time for developing skills beneficial for them and not for my career ..I think if I will spend more time in the languages I know which are right now in good demand in this industry I can get better opportunity and pay.



I know these managers are making work out of me as their business needs, otherwise they would have to hire more developers who has that specific skills, in other words, i am in one way playing polyglot role and cutting the cost of this project.



Now, with the given scenarios, what can i do to receive appreciation and hike/promotion if i continue to be working like this and learning new languages as per as business needs ?



Note my manager is not a developer and they have very limited knowledge on development work and especially those languages which they asked me to learn.







professionalism software-industry leadership behavior learning






share|improve this question









New contributor




Shivendra Gupta is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Shivendra Gupta is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday







Shivendra Gupta













New contributor




Shivendra Gupta is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Mar 17 at 8:12









Shivendra GuptaShivendra Gupta

277128




277128




New contributor




Shivendra Gupta is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Shivendra Gupta is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Shivendra Gupta is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 5





    We cannot answer "what should I do" questions here, as that choice is always up to you. What do you want the result of your interactions with your manager to be? Them stopping to ask you to learn new languages?

    – Erik
    Mar 17 at 8:20






  • 65





    I really don't understand why asking you to learn new languages is not showing you respect. It's saying you are someone who has the ability to learn new skills and isn't stuck in a rut.

    – Philip Kendall
    Mar 17 at 8:42






  • 1





    @ShivendraGupta That is highly significant

    – Gregory Currie
    Mar 17 at 8:53






  • 2





    How long have you worked there?

    – Gregory Currie
    Mar 17 at 9:02






  • 1





    I'm getting the feeling the real issue here is the lack of promotion, not the new languages?

    – Philip Kendall
    Mar 17 at 9:07












  • 5





    We cannot answer "what should I do" questions here, as that choice is always up to you. What do you want the result of your interactions with your manager to be? Them stopping to ask you to learn new languages?

    – Erik
    Mar 17 at 8:20






  • 65





    I really don't understand why asking you to learn new languages is not showing you respect. It's saying you are someone who has the ability to learn new skills and isn't stuck in a rut.

    – Philip Kendall
    Mar 17 at 8:42






  • 1





    @ShivendraGupta That is highly significant

    – Gregory Currie
    Mar 17 at 8:53






  • 2





    How long have you worked there?

    – Gregory Currie
    Mar 17 at 9:02






  • 1





    I'm getting the feeling the real issue here is the lack of promotion, not the new languages?

    – Philip Kendall
    Mar 17 at 9:07







5




5





We cannot answer "what should I do" questions here, as that choice is always up to you. What do you want the result of your interactions with your manager to be? Them stopping to ask you to learn new languages?

– Erik
Mar 17 at 8:20





We cannot answer "what should I do" questions here, as that choice is always up to you. What do you want the result of your interactions with your manager to be? Them stopping to ask you to learn new languages?

– Erik
Mar 17 at 8:20




65




65





I really don't understand why asking you to learn new languages is not showing you respect. It's saying you are someone who has the ability to learn new skills and isn't stuck in a rut.

– Philip Kendall
Mar 17 at 8:42





I really don't understand why asking you to learn new languages is not showing you respect. It's saying you are someone who has the ability to learn new skills and isn't stuck in a rut.

– Philip Kendall
Mar 17 at 8:42




1




1





@ShivendraGupta That is highly significant

– Gregory Currie
Mar 17 at 8:53





@ShivendraGupta That is highly significant

– Gregory Currie
Mar 17 at 8:53




2




2





How long have you worked there?

– Gregory Currie
Mar 17 at 9:02





How long have you worked there?

– Gregory Currie
Mar 17 at 9:02




1




1





I'm getting the feeling the real issue here is the lack of promotion, not the new languages?

– Philip Kendall
Mar 17 at 9:07





I'm getting the feeling the real issue here is the lack of promotion, not the new languages?

– Philip Kendall
Mar 17 at 9:07










9 Answers
9






active

oldest

votes


















82














First off, I want to say that there would be many people envious of your position.



You mentioned you are a graduate, this situation can be typical of graduate programs.



Sometimes placement within a specific team can happen quickly, and sometimes without even the blessing of the manager of a team.



They may not even be prepared for you, or have work of a specific "difficulty" able for you to work on.



The thing is, at the very start of employment, and especially for graduates, it's often the case that graduates are not a net-benefit for a team. There can be long ramp-up times where you are not able to add benefit to the team as you gain experience and knowledge in a domain.



You are not a "joke", you are just fresh talent that can't be considered to provide the same level of work as someone experienced in the team.



Depending on what is going on, they may give you learning tasks which, while you may find useless, will give great benefit to the team going forward. This is in addition to great personal benefit to yourself.



It's understandable that you want to add value to the team. That will happen in due course.



If you are concerned, you should ask your manager what the short/medium/long term plans for you are, including what is required to transition you from graduate to the next rung of the ladder (presumably junior?). He will be the best person to explain to you what he has in store for you.






share|improve this answer




















  • 18





    "...it's often the case that graduates are not a net-benefit for a team." Deserves bolding. Most school will not prepare you for the practical problems you will face in software.

    – jpmc26
    2 days ago






  • 1





    @jpmc26 This is terribly true. Especially when you're doing sandwich courses or working as an apprentice in a company in parallel to your studies. Practically everything you learn will come from your mentor or is self-taught.

    – Clockwork
    2 days ago











  • @jpmc26 Well, there is a gold side to that medal as well. Most young new hires are highly dynamic to changes, are eager and willing to learn new things, and will trust more those who seek to change to improve. I have met my share of "king of the hill" grumpy old experts who just crave to say no to every initiative, because everyone always remembers that one time... and then as a victim of selection bias they gradually go from being a cog in the machine to being sand in the machine. So, learning by doing is a good thing, but it has its pitfalls.

    – Stian Yttervik
    2 days ago






  • 4





    @StianYttervik And that's kind of the problem with the OP, isn't it? He's already exhibiting behavior of those "grumpy old experts" after a year in a job. If you aren't even flexible, what's the point of employing you?

    – Luaan
    2 days ago


















144














From one of your comments:




i want to work what i like to work and not what they want me to work




You need to go and start your own company then. If you're working for somebody else, you're at work to do what your employer wants you to do, not to do what you want to do.






share|improve this answer


















  • 8





    Unfortunately some schools don't teach students that work is not for their amusement.

    – Nelson
    Mar 17 at 16:19






  • 26





    Starting one's own company isn't even going to solve this. You're still expected to consider what the client wants you to do, if you want to be able to cash some money in. And I'm not even mentioning what the administration wants you to do...

    – dim
    2 days ago







  • 3





    @aloisdg Except that if you can't stick at it, you may never get good enough to get to the "fun" part. If you don't have a profession you enjoy, of course, this may not be such a concern for you. Even then though, the better you get at one thing, the more you get paid and the easier it is to cover your bills.

    – Graham
    2 days ago






  • 1





    @RedSonja Maybe, but probably not to the extremes we see today. It's something that has gotten progressively worse over the past 3 generations or so.

    – jpmc26
    2 days ago






  • 5





    Disagree with this answer. Literally taken you are correct. But he probally means "I'd like to work with techniques I like, at least most of the time". Then the solution would be "try to find a company that matches more".

    – Martijn
    2 days ago


















61














In addition to the other good answers already here, I also think it may be useful to note that your attitude toward languages shows inexperience as a programmer.



The core tools and structures of programming (and, more generally, software engineering) are largely language-independent, and most of the people that I know who are strong programmers are not deeply concerned with choice of language. They often have languages they know better and prefer and languages they dislike, but their attitude toward being asked to work with a new language is typically not "No, I don't know it." but "I'll be a little slower on this project because I haven't used this language before."



As such, I would definitely advise embracing this opportunity to learn and to approach it as a chance to improve your skills as a software engineer overall.



In short: not as "now I need to learn language X" but "now I get to become better at programming in general but learning how language X is different than the languages I've used before."






share|improve this answer










New contributor




jakebeal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 26





    After the third language they all look the same anyway. It gets easier with practice, and looks impressive on your CV.

    – RedSonja
    Mar 17 at 13:53






  • 13





    While I would subscribe to the overall sentiment of your answer - especially to embrace the opportunity to learn as a chance to improve one's skill - I would still argue that learning a new language "a few days" only without then at least using it to some extent is mostly a waste of time. It will just not stick to memory and will be largely forgotten in three months from now.

    – Ghanima
    Mar 17 at 14:03






  • 4





    @RedSonja Still putting semi-colons after Python statements?

    – DrMcCleod
    2 days ago






  • 1





    @DrMcCleod I'm still omitting them after Perl statements :(

    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    2 days ago






  • 2





    "The core tools and structures of programming (and, more generally, software engineering) are largely language-independent..." This is an oft repeated idea, but I don't buy it. The standard idioms of a language are heavily dependent on what features the language provides, meaning that code to do the same thing might look very different in each one. For example, OO is discouraged in Python in favor of more procedural or functional approaches; classes are rarely needed except to amalgamate related data. I would instead say that knowing how they differ leads to a better understanding and code.

    – jpmc26
    2 days ago



















32














Unless you work for a company that only makes its own proprietary software, and therefore has complete control over their languages and tools (and has no wish to move on), learning unfamiliar technologies is part of the job. Saying no to it is not only impractical at your level of experience, it is also a significantly career limiting move, as when the market moves on from what you know you'll find the range of jobs available to you dries up.



In any case, having a broad range of languages under your belt is technically beneficial:



  • you're able to work on a wider variety of projects,

  • you'll learn all the advantages of each and the tradeoffs they make; being able to select the right tool for the job is a highly important skill if you wish to become a senior

  • the more you learn, the easier each new one becomes.

As noted in the comments, you should be pleased that they want you to break out of your silo, it's a sign that they respect your ability to learn quickly.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    It would be a sign of respect if they got the OP to use the languages learnt - which does not seem to be the case....

    – Solar Mike
    Mar 17 at 9:26






  • 13





    @ShivendraGupta I don't know how this work where you are, but as someone who graduated 2 years ago, if I got a promotion each time I learned a new language, I'd be CEO by now. (And I'm still plenty efficient with my main language). In CS, learning new technologies is part of the job, as pointed in the answer, and it isn't a lack of respect to make you go up in competence without giving you a promotion outright.

    – Nyakouai
    Mar 17 at 10:35






  • 3





    Promotion isn't just about the number of languages you know. At least where I've been, a senior engineer also needs to be working on having influence in their team beyond the immediate tasks -whether that be getting involved with higher level decision making, developing more junior staff, being the interface with other departments. If you are a recent graduate then this is probably some way off. The best thing you can do is sit down with your manager and ask "what one thing would take me closer to a promotion next round?" rather than sit fuming that you didn't get it.

    – Julia Hayward
    Mar 17 at 15:10






  • 4





    "Respect" and "giving you a promotion" are very different.It is perfectly possible for them to be respecting your current skills, while believing that you don't yet have the skills necessary for the next level. And if you push back against gaining those skills, you're harming yourself.

    – Julia Hayward
    Mar 17 at 15:11






  • 2





    I would add to the list that being familiar with differing approaches to programming (which manifest as different norms and standards in different languages) will actually help you write better code. Learning Python's more procedural/functional approach significantly changed my C# code for the better.

    – jpmc26
    2 days ago


















8














You should take it as a blessing in disguise. You are learning other technologies and tools that you wouldn't otherwise learn if you were "pigeoned holed" into one language or platform. It gets easier to learn new technologies the more you do it - they are more alike than you think and there are frameworks or methodologies that span across platforms and tools.



I begun as an Android developer 6 years ago and a couple of years ago there was a time where there were too many Android developers at my company to have work and be productive. I was forced to learn React or be twiddling my thumbs for a few months. That was one of the best decisions I have ever made. Since then I have dabbled in many different tools like Flutter, React Native, Ionic, Angular, React, Native iOS, and Backend Web (AWS). Since I have experience with all of these tools I have more options to choose from of what I want to work on and thus have the ability to choose a project that is very interesting to me based on that flexibility.




I am not against learning new things which are beneficial to them, the point is I am trading off my time for developing skills beneficial for them and not for my career ..I think if I will spend more time in the languages I know which are right now in good demand in this industry I can get better opportunity and pay.




Actually them exposing you to the different tools might actually make you discover a hidden talent or understand how other platforms work - giving you a huge advantage over your competition and peers. "I think if I will spend more time in the languages I know which are right now in good demand in this industry I can get better opportunity and pay." - anyone in the industry would take a flexible developer who was good at coding rather than someone who can only do one platform or tool well. A great developer is not only purely measured by the knowledge of the framework or tooling they're on, but also how well they interact with their team, what methodologies they know, and how they write code.



Languages, frameworks, and tools change so often that you should focus on the goal you are achieving in the work they're giving you, rather than the chosen tooling or language.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Andrew Grosner is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 1





    +1 for "anyone in the industry would take a flexible developer who was good at coding rather than someone who can only do one platform or tool well."

    – Ilmari Karonen
    2 days ago


















3














I want to concur with the other people who have pointed out the technical aspects of your problem: learning new languages quickly is one of the most important skills you will ever develop as a modern software engineer. From my perspective, every language is just a different library of syntactic sugar. They invariably make some tasks simpler at the cost of making other tasks more involved. Therefore, learning new languages is no different from learning new APIs and libraries. And the better someone like you or me is at leveraging existing tools, the more productive we become. If we consider the fact that these days new, powerful tools are being created and shared everyday, the dramatic advantage of a developer who can identify the right tools and leverage them for faster development becomes (to me) the single most important trait for being a good peogrammer.



Although there are "C wizards" and other incredibly specialized individuals in this industry, the most productive software engineer will, in my mind, be the one that writes the least code, and lets the right language and library do the rest.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Jonathan Jou is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



























    2














    So I wanted to point out that a lot of people saying you should be honored and that what is happening is good are only speaking bs. Realistically, you should want your job to be stuff you like, otherwise you have to deal with that daily and it makes your life worse. I would recommend asking if you could just focus on your current languages, and state that that would be a much greater asset to the company, as you can be great at those languages, and you won't screw up. Say this kindly though, and if they refuse, you can always start looking for another job. Companies shouldn't hire you for one thing and expect you to do something else. That's complete bs. If it isn't specifically listed as something you had to do when you got your current role, then you don't have to do it.



    Edit: This is looking at the situation in a corporate manner, but from a programming perspective, you still might wanna know more languages if they are super close bound to what you know or are always required for what you do. That being said, they might have teams for other languages, but for example, if you know HTML and JavaScript, it would be best you know CSS (this is just an example).






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    LimeCyborg is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.















    • 3





      Technically, you're not wrong. (Well, except maybe about hiring someone to do one thing and then asking them to do something else. Companies do that all the time, because their needs change and it's cheaper and easier than firing the first guy and hiring someone else to replace them.) But I don't think this is good advice for the OP. A programmer who only knows one language (or two or three) is like a carpenter who only knows how to use one tool -- not completely useless, but also not what most employers are looking for, especially not for senior positions.

      – Ilmari Karonen
      2 days ago







    • 1





      The thing is, programming languages aren't anything special. If you're not willing to work with different languages, are you also unwilling to work on different projects (written in different ways), adopting new development practices, working with other people's code, using the right tools for the job (tough if you only know one)...? This is problematic enough for a senior, but outright suicidal for a recent graduate - it just makes you look like someone who highly overestimates their own skills and contributions, inflexible, with an inflated ego. Bad all around.

      – Luaan
      2 days ago


















    2














    After doing this rodeo for 20+ years I've gone through some of this.



    You have a career choice. From what you stated, you want to be a specialist in your area of choice. That's great, we need folks of all backgrounds and focus.



    What your company wants of you isn't a joke. You're not a joke because of it either. You're the programmer! They don't care or maybe even know what their options might be. They've hired you to bring solutions.



    The scale of this changes depending on if you're working at a company where their software is their business vs where software is a necessary evil to conducting their business.



    I will tell you that being a hyper focused specialist is fine and good, but your options will be very narrow.



    I've never heard anyone say being a Polyglot was a bad thing though. Learning various languages will expose you to novel algorithm approaches and different ways of solving the same problems. All knowledge is good.



    Be thirsty my friend and drink from the fire hose of knowledge!






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Casey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.




















    • All knowledge is good. Sure, but time's limited. Jumping from medium level c# to java isn't going to teach as much as jumping from e.g c++ to haskell.

      – Joelty
      2 days ago












    • Time is the one thing that is short supply I will agree. Your point is valid but I didn't get the feeling that the op was at this level yet.

      – Casey
      yesterday


















    0














    This situation sounds distinctly familiar to me.



    I've been in the enviable position for a large part of last year of being on the team's backburner, my particular speciality as an App-Developer being known to be needed, but not for a while.
    So they tasked me to upskill in Web-Development technologies and work on the company website.



    This looks great on my CV, it's a whole skillset I didn't have before and I'm glad to have it.

    As others have said, it's normal to be required to learn new skills and languages as a software developer.

    Take it as a good thing, some studios simply won't give you the opportunity.



    However, the big caveat is that they also gave me an attendant payrise to recognise my new capabilities.



    If you're learning new skills or knowledge that affect your future employment, you have leverage to ask for a payrise.



    Remember though, with rare exception, your employer will not tell you this, nor will they do it automatically.

    You need to be the one to make a case for it.






    share|improve this answer





















      protected by Community 2 days ago



      Thank you for your interest in this question.
      Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



      Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














      9 Answers
      9






      active

      oldest

      votes








      9 Answers
      9






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      82














      First off, I want to say that there would be many people envious of your position.



      You mentioned you are a graduate, this situation can be typical of graduate programs.



      Sometimes placement within a specific team can happen quickly, and sometimes without even the blessing of the manager of a team.



      They may not even be prepared for you, or have work of a specific "difficulty" able for you to work on.



      The thing is, at the very start of employment, and especially for graduates, it's often the case that graduates are not a net-benefit for a team. There can be long ramp-up times where you are not able to add benefit to the team as you gain experience and knowledge in a domain.



      You are not a "joke", you are just fresh talent that can't be considered to provide the same level of work as someone experienced in the team.



      Depending on what is going on, they may give you learning tasks which, while you may find useless, will give great benefit to the team going forward. This is in addition to great personal benefit to yourself.



      It's understandable that you want to add value to the team. That will happen in due course.



      If you are concerned, you should ask your manager what the short/medium/long term plans for you are, including what is required to transition you from graduate to the next rung of the ladder (presumably junior?). He will be the best person to explain to you what he has in store for you.






      share|improve this answer




















      • 18





        "...it's often the case that graduates are not a net-benefit for a team." Deserves bolding. Most school will not prepare you for the practical problems you will face in software.

        – jpmc26
        2 days ago






      • 1





        @jpmc26 This is terribly true. Especially when you're doing sandwich courses or working as an apprentice in a company in parallel to your studies. Practically everything you learn will come from your mentor or is self-taught.

        – Clockwork
        2 days ago











      • @jpmc26 Well, there is a gold side to that medal as well. Most young new hires are highly dynamic to changes, are eager and willing to learn new things, and will trust more those who seek to change to improve. I have met my share of "king of the hill" grumpy old experts who just crave to say no to every initiative, because everyone always remembers that one time... and then as a victim of selection bias they gradually go from being a cog in the machine to being sand in the machine. So, learning by doing is a good thing, but it has its pitfalls.

        – Stian Yttervik
        2 days ago






      • 4





        @StianYttervik And that's kind of the problem with the OP, isn't it? He's already exhibiting behavior of those "grumpy old experts" after a year in a job. If you aren't even flexible, what's the point of employing you?

        – Luaan
        2 days ago















      82














      First off, I want to say that there would be many people envious of your position.



      You mentioned you are a graduate, this situation can be typical of graduate programs.



      Sometimes placement within a specific team can happen quickly, and sometimes without even the blessing of the manager of a team.



      They may not even be prepared for you, or have work of a specific "difficulty" able for you to work on.



      The thing is, at the very start of employment, and especially for graduates, it's often the case that graduates are not a net-benefit for a team. There can be long ramp-up times where you are not able to add benefit to the team as you gain experience and knowledge in a domain.



      You are not a "joke", you are just fresh talent that can't be considered to provide the same level of work as someone experienced in the team.



      Depending on what is going on, they may give you learning tasks which, while you may find useless, will give great benefit to the team going forward. This is in addition to great personal benefit to yourself.



      It's understandable that you want to add value to the team. That will happen in due course.



      If you are concerned, you should ask your manager what the short/medium/long term plans for you are, including what is required to transition you from graduate to the next rung of the ladder (presumably junior?). He will be the best person to explain to you what he has in store for you.






      share|improve this answer




















      • 18





        "...it's often the case that graduates are not a net-benefit for a team." Deserves bolding. Most school will not prepare you for the practical problems you will face in software.

        – jpmc26
        2 days ago






      • 1





        @jpmc26 This is terribly true. Especially when you're doing sandwich courses or working as an apprentice in a company in parallel to your studies. Practically everything you learn will come from your mentor or is self-taught.

        – Clockwork
        2 days ago











      • @jpmc26 Well, there is a gold side to that medal as well. Most young new hires are highly dynamic to changes, are eager and willing to learn new things, and will trust more those who seek to change to improve. I have met my share of "king of the hill" grumpy old experts who just crave to say no to every initiative, because everyone always remembers that one time... and then as a victim of selection bias they gradually go from being a cog in the machine to being sand in the machine. So, learning by doing is a good thing, but it has its pitfalls.

        – Stian Yttervik
        2 days ago






      • 4





        @StianYttervik And that's kind of the problem with the OP, isn't it? He's already exhibiting behavior of those "grumpy old experts" after a year in a job. If you aren't even flexible, what's the point of employing you?

        – Luaan
        2 days ago













      82












      82








      82







      First off, I want to say that there would be many people envious of your position.



      You mentioned you are a graduate, this situation can be typical of graduate programs.



      Sometimes placement within a specific team can happen quickly, and sometimes without even the blessing of the manager of a team.



      They may not even be prepared for you, or have work of a specific "difficulty" able for you to work on.



      The thing is, at the very start of employment, and especially for graduates, it's often the case that graduates are not a net-benefit for a team. There can be long ramp-up times where you are not able to add benefit to the team as you gain experience and knowledge in a domain.



      You are not a "joke", you are just fresh talent that can't be considered to provide the same level of work as someone experienced in the team.



      Depending on what is going on, they may give you learning tasks which, while you may find useless, will give great benefit to the team going forward. This is in addition to great personal benefit to yourself.



      It's understandable that you want to add value to the team. That will happen in due course.



      If you are concerned, you should ask your manager what the short/medium/long term plans for you are, including what is required to transition you from graduate to the next rung of the ladder (presumably junior?). He will be the best person to explain to you what he has in store for you.






      share|improve this answer















      First off, I want to say that there would be many people envious of your position.



      You mentioned you are a graduate, this situation can be typical of graduate programs.



      Sometimes placement within a specific team can happen quickly, and sometimes without even the blessing of the manager of a team.



      They may not even be prepared for you, or have work of a specific "difficulty" able for you to work on.



      The thing is, at the very start of employment, and especially for graduates, it's often the case that graduates are not a net-benefit for a team. There can be long ramp-up times where you are not able to add benefit to the team as you gain experience and knowledge in a domain.



      You are not a "joke", you are just fresh talent that can't be considered to provide the same level of work as someone experienced in the team.



      Depending on what is going on, they may give you learning tasks which, while you may find useless, will give great benefit to the team going forward. This is in addition to great personal benefit to yourself.



      It's understandable that you want to add value to the team. That will happen in due course.



      If you are concerned, you should ask your manager what the short/medium/long term plans for you are, including what is required to transition you from graduate to the next rung of the ladder (presumably junior?). He will be the best person to explain to you what he has in store for you.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Mar 17 at 15:34









      Kat

      2,80221318




      2,80221318










      answered Mar 17 at 9:11









      Gregory CurrieGregory Currie

      2,69021623




      2,69021623







      • 18





        "...it's often the case that graduates are not a net-benefit for a team." Deserves bolding. Most school will not prepare you for the practical problems you will face in software.

        – jpmc26
        2 days ago






      • 1





        @jpmc26 This is terribly true. Especially when you're doing sandwich courses or working as an apprentice in a company in parallel to your studies. Practically everything you learn will come from your mentor or is self-taught.

        – Clockwork
        2 days ago











      • @jpmc26 Well, there is a gold side to that medal as well. Most young new hires are highly dynamic to changes, are eager and willing to learn new things, and will trust more those who seek to change to improve. I have met my share of "king of the hill" grumpy old experts who just crave to say no to every initiative, because everyone always remembers that one time... and then as a victim of selection bias they gradually go from being a cog in the machine to being sand in the machine. So, learning by doing is a good thing, but it has its pitfalls.

        – Stian Yttervik
        2 days ago






      • 4





        @StianYttervik And that's kind of the problem with the OP, isn't it? He's already exhibiting behavior of those "grumpy old experts" after a year in a job. If you aren't even flexible, what's the point of employing you?

        – Luaan
        2 days ago












      • 18





        "...it's often the case that graduates are not a net-benefit for a team." Deserves bolding. Most school will not prepare you for the practical problems you will face in software.

        – jpmc26
        2 days ago






      • 1





        @jpmc26 This is terribly true. Especially when you're doing sandwich courses or working as an apprentice in a company in parallel to your studies. Practically everything you learn will come from your mentor or is self-taught.

        – Clockwork
        2 days ago











      • @jpmc26 Well, there is a gold side to that medal as well. Most young new hires are highly dynamic to changes, are eager and willing to learn new things, and will trust more those who seek to change to improve. I have met my share of "king of the hill" grumpy old experts who just crave to say no to every initiative, because everyone always remembers that one time... and then as a victim of selection bias they gradually go from being a cog in the machine to being sand in the machine. So, learning by doing is a good thing, but it has its pitfalls.

        – Stian Yttervik
        2 days ago






      • 4





        @StianYttervik And that's kind of the problem with the OP, isn't it? He's already exhibiting behavior of those "grumpy old experts" after a year in a job. If you aren't even flexible, what's the point of employing you?

        – Luaan
        2 days ago







      18




      18





      "...it's often the case that graduates are not a net-benefit for a team." Deserves bolding. Most school will not prepare you for the practical problems you will face in software.

      – jpmc26
      2 days ago





      "...it's often the case that graduates are not a net-benefit for a team." Deserves bolding. Most school will not prepare you for the practical problems you will face in software.

      – jpmc26
      2 days ago




      1




      1





      @jpmc26 This is terribly true. Especially when you're doing sandwich courses or working as an apprentice in a company in parallel to your studies. Practically everything you learn will come from your mentor or is self-taught.

      – Clockwork
      2 days ago





      @jpmc26 This is terribly true. Especially when you're doing sandwich courses or working as an apprentice in a company in parallel to your studies. Practically everything you learn will come from your mentor or is self-taught.

      – Clockwork
      2 days ago













      @jpmc26 Well, there is a gold side to that medal as well. Most young new hires are highly dynamic to changes, are eager and willing to learn new things, and will trust more those who seek to change to improve. I have met my share of "king of the hill" grumpy old experts who just crave to say no to every initiative, because everyone always remembers that one time... and then as a victim of selection bias they gradually go from being a cog in the machine to being sand in the machine. So, learning by doing is a good thing, but it has its pitfalls.

      – Stian Yttervik
      2 days ago





      @jpmc26 Well, there is a gold side to that medal as well. Most young new hires are highly dynamic to changes, are eager and willing to learn new things, and will trust more those who seek to change to improve. I have met my share of "king of the hill" grumpy old experts who just crave to say no to every initiative, because everyone always remembers that one time... and then as a victim of selection bias they gradually go from being a cog in the machine to being sand in the machine. So, learning by doing is a good thing, but it has its pitfalls.

      – Stian Yttervik
      2 days ago




      4




      4





      @StianYttervik And that's kind of the problem with the OP, isn't it? He's already exhibiting behavior of those "grumpy old experts" after a year in a job. If you aren't even flexible, what's the point of employing you?

      – Luaan
      2 days ago





      @StianYttervik And that's kind of the problem with the OP, isn't it? He's already exhibiting behavior of those "grumpy old experts" after a year in a job. If you aren't even flexible, what's the point of employing you?

      – Luaan
      2 days ago













      144














      From one of your comments:




      i want to work what i like to work and not what they want me to work




      You need to go and start your own company then. If you're working for somebody else, you're at work to do what your employer wants you to do, not to do what you want to do.






      share|improve this answer


















      • 8





        Unfortunately some schools don't teach students that work is not for their amusement.

        – Nelson
        Mar 17 at 16:19






      • 26





        Starting one's own company isn't even going to solve this. You're still expected to consider what the client wants you to do, if you want to be able to cash some money in. And I'm not even mentioning what the administration wants you to do...

        – dim
        2 days ago







      • 3





        @aloisdg Except that if you can't stick at it, you may never get good enough to get to the "fun" part. If you don't have a profession you enjoy, of course, this may not be such a concern for you. Even then though, the better you get at one thing, the more you get paid and the easier it is to cover your bills.

        – Graham
        2 days ago






      • 1





        @RedSonja Maybe, but probably not to the extremes we see today. It's something that has gotten progressively worse over the past 3 generations or so.

        – jpmc26
        2 days ago






      • 5





        Disagree with this answer. Literally taken you are correct. But he probally means "I'd like to work with techniques I like, at least most of the time". Then the solution would be "try to find a company that matches more".

        – Martijn
        2 days ago















      144














      From one of your comments:




      i want to work what i like to work and not what they want me to work




      You need to go and start your own company then. If you're working for somebody else, you're at work to do what your employer wants you to do, not to do what you want to do.






      share|improve this answer


















      • 8





        Unfortunately some schools don't teach students that work is not for their amusement.

        – Nelson
        Mar 17 at 16:19






      • 26





        Starting one's own company isn't even going to solve this. You're still expected to consider what the client wants you to do, if you want to be able to cash some money in. And I'm not even mentioning what the administration wants you to do...

        – dim
        2 days ago







      • 3





        @aloisdg Except that if you can't stick at it, you may never get good enough to get to the "fun" part. If you don't have a profession you enjoy, of course, this may not be such a concern for you. Even then though, the better you get at one thing, the more you get paid and the easier it is to cover your bills.

        – Graham
        2 days ago






      • 1





        @RedSonja Maybe, but probably not to the extremes we see today. It's something that has gotten progressively worse over the past 3 generations or so.

        – jpmc26
        2 days ago






      • 5





        Disagree with this answer. Literally taken you are correct. But he probally means "I'd like to work with techniques I like, at least most of the time". Then the solution would be "try to find a company that matches more".

        – Martijn
        2 days ago













      144












      144








      144







      From one of your comments:




      i want to work what i like to work and not what they want me to work




      You need to go and start your own company then. If you're working for somebody else, you're at work to do what your employer wants you to do, not to do what you want to do.






      share|improve this answer













      From one of your comments:




      i want to work what i like to work and not what they want me to work




      You need to go and start your own company then. If you're working for somebody else, you're at work to do what your employer wants you to do, not to do what you want to do.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Mar 17 at 9:00









      Philip KendallPhilip Kendall

      52.9k36130162




      52.9k36130162







      • 8





        Unfortunately some schools don't teach students that work is not for their amusement.

        – Nelson
        Mar 17 at 16:19






      • 26





        Starting one's own company isn't even going to solve this. You're still expected to consider what the client wants you to do, if you want to be able to cash some money in. And I'm not even mentioning what the administration wants you to do...

        – dim
        2 days ago







      • 3





        @aloisdg Except that if you can't stick at it, you may never get good enough to get to the "fun" part. If you don't have a profession you enjoy, of course, this may not be such a concern for you. Even then though, the better you get at one thing, the more you get paid and the easier it is to cover your bills.

        – Graham
        2 days ago






      • 1





        @RedSonja Maybe, but probably not to the extremes we see today. It's something that has gotten progressively worse over the past 3 generations or so.

        – jpmc26
        2 days ago






      • 5





        Disagree with this answer. Literally taken you are correct. But he probally means "I'd like to work with techniques I like, at least most of the time". Then the solution would be "try to find a company that matches more".

        – Martijn
        2 days ago












      • 8





        Unfortunately some schools don't teach students that work is not for their amusement.

        – Nelson
        Mar 17 at 16:19






      • 26





        Starting one's own company isn't even going to solve this. You're still expected to consider what the client wants you to do, if you want to be able to cash some money in. And I'm not even mentioning what the administration wants you to do...

        – dim
        2 days ago







      • 3





        @aloisdg Except that if you can't stick at it, you may never get good enough to get to the "fun" part. If you don't have a profession you enjoy, of course, this may not be such a concern for you. Even then though, the better you get at one thing, the more you get paid and the easier it is to cover your bills.

        – Graham
        2 days ago






      • 1





        @RedSonja Maybe, but probably not to the extremes we see today. It's something that has gotten progressively worse over the past 3 generations or so.

        – jpmc26
        2 days ago






      • 5





        Disagree with this answer. Literally taken you are correct. But he probally means "I'd like to work with techniques I like, at least most of the time". Then the solution would be "try to find a company that matches more".

        – Martijn
        2 days ago







      8




      8





      Unfortunately some schools don't teach students that work is not for their amusement.

      – Nelson
      Mar 17 at 16:19





      Unfortunately some schools don't teach students that work is not for their amusement.

      – Nelson
      Mar 17 at 16:19




      26




      26





      Starting one's own company isn't even going to solve this. You're still expected to consider what the client wants you to do, if you want to be able to cash some money in. And I'm not even mentioning what the administration wants you to do...

      – dim
      2 days ago






      Starting one's own company isn't even going to solve this. You're still expected to consider what the client wants you to do, if you want to be able to cash some money in. And I'm not even mentioning what the administration wants you to do...

      – dim
      2 days ago





      3




      3





      @aloisdg Except that if you can't stick at it, you may never get good enough to get to the "fun" part. If you don't have a profession you enjoy, of course, this may not be such a concern for you. Even then though, the better you get at one thing, the more you get paid and the easier it is to cover your bills.

      – Graham
      2 days ago





      @aloisdg Except that if you can't stick at it, you may never get good enough to get to the "fun" part. If you don't have a profession you enjoy, of course, this may not be such a concern for you. Even then though, the better you get at one thing, the more you get paid and the easier it is to cover your bills.

      – Graham
      2 days ago




      1




      1





      @RedSonja Maybe, but probably not to the extremes we see today. It's something that has gotten progressively worse over the past 3 generations or so.

      – jpmc26
      2 days ago





      @RedSonja Maybe, but probably not to the extremes we see today. It's something that has gotten progressively worse over the past 3 generations or so.

      – jpmc26
      2 days ago




      5




      5





      Disagree with this answer. Literally taken you are correct. But he probally means "I'd like to work with techniques I like, at least most of the time". Then the solution would be "try to find a company that matches more".

      – Martijn
      2 days ago





      Disagree with this answer. Literally taken you are correct. But he probally means "I'd like to work with techniques I like, at least most of the time". Then the solution would be "try to find a company that matches more".

      – Martijn
      2 days ago











      61














      In addition to the other good answers already here, I also think it may be useful to note that your attitude toward languages shows inexperience as a programmer.



      The core tools and structures of programming (and, more generally, software engineering) are largely language-independent, and most of the people that I know who are strong programmers are not deeply concerned with choice of language. They often have languages they know better and prefer and languages they dislike, but their attitude toward being asked to work with a new language is typically not "No, I don't know it." but "I'll be a little slower on this project because I haven't used this language before."



      As such, I would definitely advise embracing this opportunity to learn and to approach it as a chance to improve your skills as a software engineer overall.



      In short: not as "now I need to learn language X" but "now I get to become better at programming in general but learning how language X is different than the languages I've used before."






      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      jakebeal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.















      • 26





        After the third language they all look the same anyway. It gets easier with practice, and looks impressive on your CV.

        – RedSonja
        Mar 17 at 13:53






      • 13





        While I would subscribe to the overall sentiment of your answer - especially to embrace the opportunity to learn as a chance to improve one's skill - I would still argue that learning a new language "a few days" only without then at least using it to some extent is mostly a waste of time. It will just not stick to memory and will be largely forgotten in three months from now.

        – Ghanima
        Mar 17 at 14:03






      • 4





        @RedSonja Still putting semi-colons after Python statements?

        – DrMcCleod
        2 days ago






      • 1





        @DrMcCleod I'm still omitting them after Perl statements :(

        – Lightness Races in Orbit
        2 days ago






      • 2





        "The core tools and structures of programming (and, more generally, software engineering) are largely language-independent..." This is an oft repeated idea, but I don't buy it. The standard idioms of a language are heavily dependent on what features the language provides, meaning that code to do the same thing might look very different in each one. For example, OO is discouraged in Python in favor of more procedural or functional approaches; classes are rarely needed except to amalgamate related data. I would instead say that knowing how they differ leads to a better understanding and code.

        – jpmc26
        2 days ago
















      61














      In addition to the other good answers already here, I also think it may be useful to note that your attitude toward languages shows inexperience as a programmer.



      The core tools and structures of programming (and, more generally, software engineering) are largely language-independent, and most of the people that I know who are strong programmers are not deeply concerned with choice of language. They often have languages they know better and prefer and languages they dislike, but their attitude toward being asked to work with a new language is typically not "No, I don't know it." but "I'll be a little slower on this project because I haven't used this language before."



      As such, I would definitely advise embracing this opportunity to learn and to approach it as a chance to improve your skills as a software engineer overall.



      In short: not as "now I need to learn language X" but "now I get to become better at programming in general but learning how language X is different than the languages I've used before."






      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      jakebeal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.















      • 26





        After the third language they all look the same anyway. It gets easier with practice, and looks impressive on your CV.

        – RedSonja
        Mar 17 at 13:53






      • 13





        While I would subscribe to the overall sentiment of your answer - especially to embrace the opportunity to learn as a chance to improve one's skill - I would still argue that learning a new language "a few days" only without then at least using it to some extent is mostly a waste of time. It will just not stick to memory and will be largely forgotten in three months from now.

        – Ghanima
        Mar 17 at 14:03






      • 4





        @RedSonja Still putting semi-colons after Python statements?

        – DrMcCleod
        2 days ago






      • 1





        @DrMcCleod I'm still omitting them after Perl statements :(

        – Lightness Races in Orbit
        2 days ago






      • 2





        "The core tools and structures of programming (and, more generally, software engineering) are largely language-independent..." This is an oft repeated idea, but I don't buy it. The standard idioms of a language are heavily dependent on what features the language provides, meaning that code to do the same thing might look very different in each one. For example, OO is discouraged in Python in favor of more procedural or functional approaches; classes are rarely needed except to amalgamate related data. I would instead say that knowing how they differ leads to a better understanding and code.

        – jpmc26
        2 days ago














      61












      61








      61







      In addition to the other good answers already here, I also think it may be useful to note that your attitude toward languages shows inexperience as a programmer.



      The core tools and structures of programming (and, more generally, software engineering) are largely language-independent, and most of the people that I know who are strong programmers are not deeply concerned with choice of language. They often have languages they know better and prefer and languages they dislike, but their attitude toward being asked to work with a new language is typically not "No, I don't know it." but "I'll be a little slower on this project because I haven't used this language before."



      As such, I would definitely advise embracing this opportunity to learn and to approach it as a chance to improve your skills as a software engineer overall.



      In short: not as "now I need to learn language X" but "now I get to become better at programming in general but learning how language X is different than the languages I've used before."






      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      jakebeal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.










      In addition to the other good answers already here, I also think it may be useful to note that your attitude toward languages shows inexperience as a programmer.



      The core tools and structures of programming (and, more generally, software engineering) are largely language-independent, and most of the people that I know who are strong programmers are not deeply concerned with choice of language. They often have languages they know better and prefer and languages they dislike, but their attitude toward being asked to work with a new language is typically not "No, I don't know it." but "I'll be a little slower on this project because I haven't used this language before."



      As such, I would definitely advise embracing this opportunity to learn and to approach it as a chance to improve your skills as a software engineer overall.



      In short: not as "now I need to learn language X" but "now I get to become better at programming in general but learning how language X is different than the languages I've used before."







      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      jakebeal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Mar 17 at 12:36





















      New contributor




      jakebeal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      answered Mar 17 at 11:36









      jakebealjakebeal

      57137




      57137




      New contributor




      jakebeal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      jakebeal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      jakebeal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      • 26





        After the third language they all look the same anyway. It gets easier with practice, and looks impressive on your CV.

        – RedSonja
        Mar 17 at 13:53






      • 13





        While I would subscribe to the overall sentiment of your answer - especially to embrace the opportunity to learn as a chance to improve one's skill - I would still argue that learning a new language "a few days" only without then at least using it to some extent is mostly a waste of time. It will just not stick to memory and will be largely forgotten in three months from now.

        – Ghanima
        Mar 17 at 14:03






      • 4





        @RedSonja Still putting semi-colons after Python statements?

        – DrMcCleod
        2 days ago






      • 1





        @DrMcCleod I'm still omitting them after Perl statements :(

        – Lightness Races in Orbit
        2 days ago






      • 2





        "The core tools and structures of programming (and, more generally, software engineering) are largely language-independent..." This is an oft repeated idea, but I don't buy it. The standard idioms of a language are heavily dependent on what features the language provides, meaning that code to do the same thing might look very different in each one. For example, OO is discouraged in Python in favor of more procedural or functional approaches; classes are rarely needed except to amalgamate related data. I would instead say that knowing how they differ leads to a better understanding and code.

        – jpmc26
        2 days ago













      • 26





        After the third language they all look the same anyway. It gets easier with practice, and looks impressive on your CV.

        – RedSonja
        Mar 17 at 13:53






      • 13





        While I would subscribe to the overall sentiment of your answer - especially to embrace the opportunity to learn as a chance to improve one's skill - I would still argue that learning a new language "a few days" only without then at least using it to some extent is mostly a waste of time. It will just not stick to memory and will be largely forgotten in three months from now.

        – Ghanima
        Mar 17 at 14:03






      • 4





        @RedSonja Still putting semi-colons after Python statements?

        – DrMcCleod
        2 days ago






      • 1





        @DrMcCleod I'm still omitting them after Perl statements :(

        – Lightness Races in Orbit
        2 days ago






      • 2





        "The core tools and structures of programming (and, more generally, software engineering) are largely language-independent..." This is an oft repeated idea, but I don't buy it. The standard idioms of a language are heavily dependent on what features the language provides, meaning that code to do the same thing might look very different in each one. For example, OO is discouraged in Python in favor of more procedural or functional approaches; classes are rarely needed except to amalgamate related data. I would instead say that knowing how they differ leads to a better understanding and code.

        – jpmc26
        2 days ago








      26




      26





      After the third language they all look the same anyway. It gets easier with practice, and looks impressive on your CV.

      – RedSonja
      Mar 17 at 13:53





      After the third language they all look the same anyway. It gets easier with practice, and looks impressive on your CV.

      – RedSonja
      Mar 17 at 13:53




      13




      13





      While I would subscribe to the overall sentiment of your answer - especially to embrace the opportunity to learn as a chance to improve one's skill - I would still argue that learning a new language "a few days" only without then at least using it to some extent is mostly a waste of time. It will just not stick to memory and will be largely forgotten in three months from now.

      – Ghanima
      Mar 17 at 14:03





      While I would subscribe to the overall sentiment of your answer - especially to embrace the opportunity to learn as a chance to improve one's skill - I would still argue that learning a new language "a few days" only without then at least using it to some extent is mostly a waste of time. It will just not stick to memory and will be largely forgotten in three months from now.

      – Ghanima
      Mar 17 at 14:03




      4




      4





      @RedSonja Still putting semi-colons after Python statements?

      – DrMcCleod
      2 days ago





      @RedSonja Still putting semi-colons after Python statements?

      – DrMcCleod
      2 days ago




      1




      1





      @DrMcCleod I'm still omitting them after Perl statements :(

      – Lightness Races in Orbit
      2 days ago





      @DrMcCleod I'm still omitting them after Perl statements :(

      – Lightness Races in Orbit
      2 days ago




      2




      2





      "The core tools and structures of programming (and, more generally, software engineering) are largely language-independent..." This is an oft repeated idea, but I don't buy it. The standard idioms of a language are heavily dependent on what features the language provides, meaning that code to do the same thing might look very different in each one. For example, OO is discouraged in Python in favor of more procedural or functional approaches; classes are rarely needed except to amalgamate related data. I would instead say that knowing how they differ leads to a better understanding and code.

      – jpmc26
      2 days ago






      "The core tools and structures of programming (and, more generally, software engineering) are largely language-independent..." This is an oft repeated idea, but I don't buy it. The standard idioms of a language are heavily dependent on what features the language provides, meaning that code to do the same thing might look very different in each one. For example, OO is discouraged in Python in favor of more procedural or functional approaches; classes are rarely needed except to amalgamate related data. I would instead say that knowing how they differ leads to a better understanding and code.

      – jpmc26
      2 days ago












      32














      Unless you work for a company that only makes its own proprietary software, and therefore has complete control over their languages and tools (and has no wish to move on), learning unfamiliar technologies is part of the job. Saying no to it is not only impractical at your level of experience, it is also a significantly career limiting move, as when the market moves on from what you know you'll find the range of jobs available to you dries up.



      In any case, having a broad range of languages under your belt is technically beneficial:



      • you're able to work on a wider variety of projects,

      • you'll learn all the advantages of each and the tradeoffs they make; being able to select the right tool for the job is a highly important skill if you wish to become a senior

      • the more you learn, the easier each new one becomes.

      As noted in the comments, you should be pleased that they want you to break out of your silo, it's a sign that they respect your ability to learn quickly.






      share|improve this answer


















      • 1





        It would be a sign of respect if they got the OP to use the languages learnt - which does not seem to be the case....

        – Solar Mike
        Mar 17 at 9:26






      • 13





        @ShivendraGupta I don't know how this work where you are, but as someone who graduated 2 years ago, if I got a promotion each time I learned a new language, I'd be CEO by now. (And I'm still plenty efficient with my main language). In CS, learning new technologies is part of the job, as pointed in the answer, and it isn't a lack of respect to make you go up in competence without giving you a promotion outright.

        – Nyakouai
        Mar 17 at 10:35






      • 3





        Promotion isn't just about the number of languages you know. At least where I've been, a senior engineer also needs to be working on having influence in their team beyond the immediate tasks -whether that be getting involved with higher level decision making, developing more junior staff, being the interface with other departments. If you are a recent graduate then this is probably some way off. The best thing you can do is sit down with your manager and ask "what one thing would take me closer to a promotion next round?" rather than sit fuming that you didn't get it.

        – Julia Hayward
        Mar 17 at 15:10






      • 4





        "Respect" and "giving you a promotion" are very different.It is perfectly possible for them to be respecting your current skills, while believing that you don't yet have the skills necessary for the next level. And if you push back against gaining those skills, you're harming yourself.

        – Julia Hayward
        Mar 17 at 15:11






      • 2





        I would add to the list that being familiar with differing approaches to programming (which manifest as different norms and standards in different languages) will actually help you write better code. Learning Python's more procedural/functional approach significantly changed my C# code for the better.

        – jpmc26
        2 days ago















      32














      Unless you work for a company that only makes its own proprietary software, and therefore has complete control over their languages and tools (and has no wish to move on), learning unfamiliar technologies is part of the job. Saying no to it is not only impractical at your level of experience, it is also a significantly career limiting move, as when the market moves on from what you know you'll find the range of jobs available to you dries up.



      In any case, having a broad range of languages under your belt is technically beneficial:



      • you're able to work on a wider variety of projects,

      • you'll learn all the advantages of each and the tradeoffs they make; being able to select the right tool for the job is a highly important skill if you wish to become a senior

      • the more you learn, the easier each new one becomes.

      As noted in the comments, you should be pleased that they want you to break out of your silo, it's a sign that they respect your ability to learn quickly.






      share|improve this answer


















      • 1





        It would be a sign of respect if they got the OP to use the languages learnt - which does not seem to be the case....

        – Solar Mike
        Mar 17 at 9:26






      • 13





        @ShivendraGupta I don't know how this work where you are, but as someone who graduated 2 years ago, if I got a promotion each time I learned a new language, I'd be CEO by now. (And I'm still plenty efficient with my main language). In CS, learning new technologies is part of the job, as pointed in the answer, and it isn't a lack of respect to make you go up in competence without giving you a promotion outright.

        – Nyakouai
        Mar 17 at 10:35






      • 3





        Promotion isn't just about the number of languages you know. At least where I've been, a senior engineer also needs to be working on having influence in their team beyond the immediate tasks -whether that be getting involved with higher level decision making, developing more junior staff, being the interface with other departments. If you are a recent graduate then this is probably some way off. The best thing you can do is sit down with your manager and ask "what one thing would take me closer to a promotion next round?" rather than sit fuming that you didn't get it.

        – Julia Hayward
        Mar 17 at 15:10






      • 4





        "Respect" and "giving you a promotion" are very different.It is perfectly possible for them to be respecting your current skills, while believing that you don't yet have the skills necessary for the next level. And if you push back against gaining those skills, you're harming yourself.

        – Julia Hayward
        Mar 17 at 15:11






      • 2





        I would add to the list that being familiar with differing approaches to programming (which manifest as different norms and standards in different languages) will actually help you write better code. Learning Python's more procedural/functional approach significantly changed my C# code for the better.

        – jpmc26
        2 days ago













      32












      32








      32







      Unless you work for a company that only makes its own proprietary software, and therefore has complete control over their languages and tools (and has no wish to move on), learning unfamiliar technologies is part of the job. Saying no to it is not only impractical at your level of experience, it is also a significantly career limiting move, as when the market moves on from what you know you'll find the range of jobs available to you dries up.



      In any case, having a broad range of languages under your belt is technically beneficial:



      • you're able to work on a wider variety of projects,

      • you'll learn all the advantages of each and the tradeoffs they make; being able to select the right tool for the job is a highly important skill if you wish to become a senior

      • the more you learn, the easier each new one becomes.

      As noted in the comments, you should be pleased that they want you to break out of your silo, it's a sign that they respect your ability to learn quickly.






      share|improve this answer













      Unless you work for a company that only makes its own proprietary software, and therefore has complete control over their languages and tools (and has no wish to move on), learning unfamiliar technologies is part of the job. Saying no to it is not only impractical at your level of experience, it is also a significantly career limiting move, as when the market moves on from what you know you'll find the range of jobs available to you dries up.



      In any case, having a broad range of languages under your belt is technically beneficial:



      • you're able to work on a wider variety of projects,

      • you'll learn all the advantages of each and the tradeoffs they make; being able to select the right tool for the job is a highly important skill if you wish to become a senior

      • the more you learn, the easier each new one becomes.

      As noted in the comments, you should be pleased that they want you to break out of your silo, it's a sign that they respect your ability to learn quickly.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Mar 17 at 9:01









      Julia HaywardJulia Hayward

      13.3k73840




      13.3k73840







      • 1





        It would be a sign of respect if they got the OP to use the languages learnt - which does not seem to be the case....

        – Solar Mike
        Mar 17 at 9:26






      • 13





        @ShivendraGupta I don't know how this work where you are, but as someone who graduated 2 years ago, if I got a promotion each time I learned a new language, I'd be CEO by now. (And I'm still plenty efficient with my main language). In CS, learning new technologies is part of the job, as pointed in the answer, and it isn't a lack of respect to make you go up in competence without giving you a promotion outright.

        – Nyakouai
        Mar 17 at 10:35






      • 3





        Promotion isn't just about the number of languages you know. At least where I've been, a senior engineer also needs to be working on having influence in their team beyond the immediate tasks -whether that be getting involved with higher level decision making, developing more junior staff, being the interface with other departments. If you are a recent graduate then this is probably some way off. The best thing you can do is sit down with your manager and ask "what one thing would take me closer to a promotion next round?" rather than sit fuming that you didn't get it.

        – Julia Hayward
        Mar 17 at 15:10






      • 4





        "Respect" and "giving you a promotion" are very different.It is perfectly possible for them to be respecting your current skills, while believing that you don't yet have the skills necessary for the next level. And if you push back against gaining those skills, you're harming yourself.

        – Julia Hayward
        Mar 17 at 15:11






      • 2





        I would add to the list that being familiar with differing approaches to programming (which manifest as different norms and standards in different languages) will actually help you write better code. Learning Python's more procedural/functional approach significantly changed my C# code for the better.

        – jpmc26
        2 days ago












      • 1





        It would be a sign of respect if they got the OP to use the languages learnt - which does not seem to be the case....

        – Solar Mike
        Mar 17 at 9:26






      • 13





        @ShivendraGupta I don't know how this work where you are, but as someone who graduated 2 years ago, if I got a promotion each time I learned a new language, I'd be CEO by now. (And I'm still plenty efficient with my main language). In CS, learning new technologies is part of the job, as pointed in the answer, and it isn't a lack of respect to make you go up in competence without giving you a promotion outright.

        – Nyakouai
        Mar 17 at 10:35






      • 3





        Promotion isn't just about the number of languages you know. At least where I've been, a senior engineer also needs to be working on having influence in their team beyond the immediate tasks -whether that be getting involved with higher level decision making, developing more junior staff, being the interface with other departments. If you are a recent graduate then this is probably some way off. The best thing you can do is sit down with your manager and ask "what one thing would take me closer to a promotion next round?" rather than sit fuming that you didn't get it.

        – Julia Hayward
        Mar 17 at 15:10






      • 4





        "Respect" and "giving you a promotion" are very different.It is perfectly possible for them to be respecting your current skills, while believing that you don't yet have the skills necessary for the next level. And if you push back against gaining those skills, you're harming yourself.

        – Julia Hayward
        Mar 17 at 15:11






      • 2





        I would add to the list that being familiar with differing approaches to programming (which manifest as different norms and standards in different languages) will actually help you write better code. Learning Python's more procedural/functional approach significantly changed my C# code for the better.

        – jpmc26
        2 days ago







      1




      1





      It would be a sign of respect if they got the OP to use the languages learnt - which does not seem to be the case....

      – Solar Mike
      Mar 17 at 9:26





      It would be a sign of respect if they got the OP to use the languages learnt - which does not seem to be the case....

      – Solar Mike
      Mar 17 at 9:26




      13




      13





      @ShivendraGupta I don't know how this work where you are, but as someone who graduated 2 years ago, if I got a promotion each time I learned a new language, I'd be CEO by now. (And I'm still plenty efficient with my main language). In CS, learning new technologies is part of the job, as pointed in the answer, and it isn't a lack of respect to make you go up in competence without giving you a promotion outright.

      – Nyakouai
      Mar 17 at 10:35





      @ShivendraGupta I don't know how this work where you are, but as someone who graduated 2 years ago, if I got a promotion each time I learned a new language, I'd be CEO by now. (And I'm still plenty efficient with my main language). In CS, learning new technologies is part of the job, as pointed in the answer, and it isn't a lack of respect to make you go up in competence without giving you a promotion outright.

      – Nyakouai
      Mar 17 at 10:35




      3




      3





      Promotion isn't just about the number of languages you know. At least where I've been, a senior engineer also needs to be working on having influence in their team beyond the immediate tasks -whether that be getting involved with higher level decision making, developing more junior staff, being the interface with other departments. If you are a recent graduate then this is probably some way off. The best thing you can do is sit down with your manager and ask "what one thing would take me closer to a promotion next round?" rather than sit fuming that you didn't get it.

      – Julia Hayward
      Mar 17 at 15:10





      Promotion isn't just about the number of languages you know. At least where I've been, a senior engineer also needs to be working on having influence in their team beyond the immediate tasks -whether that be getting involved with higher level decision making, developing more junior staff, being the interface with other departments. If you are a recent graduate then this is probably some way off. The best thing you can do is sit down with your manager and ask "what one thing would take me closer to a promotion next round?" rather than sit fuming that you didn't get it.

      – Julia Hayward
      Mar 17 at 15:10




      4




      4





      "Respect" and "giving you a promotion" are very different.It is perfectly possible for them to be respecting your current skills, while believing that you don't yet have the skills necessary for the next level. And if you push back against gaining those skills, you're harming yourself.

      – Julia Hayward
      Mar 17 at 15:11





      "Respect" and "giving you a promotion" are very different.It is perfectly possible for them to be respecting your current skills, while believing that you don't yet have the skills necessary for the next level. And if you push back against gaining those skills, you're harming yourself.

      – Julia Hayward
      Mar 17 at 15:11




      2




      2





      I would add to the list that being familiar with differing approaches to programming (which manifest as different norms and standards in different languages) will actually help you write better code. Learning Python's more procedural/functional approach significantly changed my C# code for the better.

      – jpmc26
      2 days ago





      I would add to the list that being familiar with differing approaches to programming (which manifest as different norms and standards in different languages) will actually help you write better code. Learning Python's more procedural/functional approach significantly changed my C# code for the better.

      – jpmc26
      2 days ago











      8














      You should take it as a blessing in disguise. You are learning other technologies and tools that you wouldn't otherwise learn if you were "pigeoned holed" into one language or platform. It gets easier to learn new technologies the more you do it - they are more alike than you think and there are frameworks or methodologies that span across platforms and tools.



      I begun as an Android developer 6 years ago and a couple of years ago there was a time where there were too many Android developers at my company to have work and be productive. I was forced to learn React or be twiddling my thumbs for a few months. That was one of the best decisions I have ever made. Since then I have dabbled in many different tools like Flutter, React Native, Ionic, Angular, React, Native iOS, and Backend Web (AWS). Since I have experience with all of these tools I have more options to choose from of what I want to work on and thus have the ability to choose a project that is very interesting to me based on that flexibility.




      I am not against learning new things which are beneficial to them, the point is I am trading off my time for developing skills beneficial for them and not for my career ..I think if I will spend more time in the languages I know which are right now in good demand in this industry I can get better opportunity and pay.




      Actually them exposing you to the different tools might actually make you discover a hidden talent or understand how other platforms work - giving you a huge advantage over your competition and peers. "I think if I will spend more time in the languages I know which are right now in good demand in this industry I can get better opportunity and pay." - anyone in the industry would take a flexible developer who was good at coding rather than someone who can only do one platform or tool well. A great developer is not only purely measured by the knowledge of the framework or tooling they're on, but also how well they interact with their team, what methodologies they know, and how they write code.



      Languages, frameworks, and tools change so often that you should focus on the goal you are achieving in the work they're giving you, rather than the chosen tooling or language.






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Andrew Grosner is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.















      • 1





        +1 for "anyone in the industry would take a flexible developer who was good at coding rather than someone who can only do one platform or tool well."

        – Ilmari Karonen
        2 days ago















      8














      You should take it as a blessing in disguise. You are learning other technologies and tools that you wouldn't otherwise learn if you were "pigeoned holed" into one language or platform. It gets easier to learn new technologies the more you do it - they are more alike than you think and there are frameworks or methodologies that span across platforms and tools.



      I begun as an Android developer 6 years ago and a couple of years ago there was a time where there were too many Android developers at my company to have work and be productive. I was forced to learn React or be twiddling my thumbs for a few months. That was one of the best decisions I have ever made. Since then I have dabbled in many different tools like Flutter, React Native, Ionic, Angular, React, Native iOS, and Backend Web (AWS). Since I have experience with all of these tools I have more options to choose from of what I want to work on and thus have the ability to choose a project that is very interesting to me based on that flexibility.




      I am not against learning new things which are beneficial to them, the point is I am trading off my time for developing skills beneficial for them and not for my career ..I think if I will spend more time in the languages I know which are right now in good demand in this industry I can get better opportunity and pay.




      Actually them exposing you to the different tools might actually make you discover a hidden talent or understand how other platforms work - giving you a huge advantage over your competition and peers. "I think if I will spend more time in the languages I know which are right now in good demand in this industry I can get better opportunity and pay." - anyone in the industry would take a flexible developer who was good at coding rather than someone who can only do one platform or tool well. A great developer is not only purely measured by the knowledge of the framework or tooling they're on, but also how well they interact with their team, what methodologies they know, and how they write code.



      Languages, frameworks, and tools change so often that you should focus on the goal you are achieving in the work they're giving you, rather than the chosen tooling or language.






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Andrew Grosner is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.















      • 1





        +1 for "anyone in the industry would take a flexible developer who was good at coding rather than someone who can only do one platform or tool well."

        – Ilmari Karonen
        2 days ago













      8












      8








      8







      You should take it as a blessing in disguise. You are learning other technologies and tools that you wouldn't otherwise learn if you were "pigeoned holed" into one language or platform. It gets easier to learn new technologies the more you do it - they are more alike than you think and there are frameworks or methodologies that span across platforms and tools.



      I begun as an Android developer 6 years ago and a couple of years ago there was a time where there were too many Android developers at my company to have work and be productive. I was forced to learn React or be twiddling my thumbs for a few months. That was one of the best decisions I have ever made. Since then I have dabbled in many different tools like Flutter, React Native, Ionic, Angular, React, Native iOS, and Backend Web (AWS). Since I have experience with all of these tools I have more options to choose from of what I want to work on and thus have the ability to choose a project that is very interesting to me based on that flexibility.




      I am not against learning new things which are beneficial to them, the point is I am trading off my time for developing skills beneficial for them and not for my career ..I think if I will spend more time in the languages I know which are right now in good demand in this industry I can get better opportunity and pay.




      Actually them exposing you to the different tools might actually make you discover a hidden talent or understand how other platforms work - giving you a huge advantage over your competition and peers. "I think if I will spend more time in the languages I know which are right now in good demand in this industry I can get better opportunity and pay." - anyone in the industry would take a flexible developer who was good at coding rather than someone who can only do one platform or tool well. A great developer is not only purely measured by the knowledge of the framework or tooling they're on, but also how well they interact with their team, what methodologies they know, and how they write code.



      Languages, frameworks, and tools change so often that you should focus on the goal you are achieving in the work they're giving you, rather than the chosen tooling or language.






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Andrew Grosner is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.










      You should take it as a blessing in disguise. You are learning other technologies and tools that you wouldn't otherwise learn if you were "pigeoned holed" into one language or platform. It gets easier to learn new technologies the more you do it - they are more alike than you think and there are frameworks or methodologies that span across platforms and tools.



      I begun as an Android developer 6 years ago and a couple of years ago there was a time where there were too many Android developers at my company to have work and be productive. I was forced to learn React or be twiddling my thumbs for a few months. That was one of the best decisions I have ever made. Since then I have dabbled in many different tools like Flutter, React Native, Ionic, Angular, React, Native iOS, and Backend Web (AWS). Since I have experience with all of these tools I have more options to choose from of what I want to work on and thus have the ability to choose a project that is very interesting to me based on that flexibility.




      I am not against learning new things which are beneficial to them, the point is I am trading off my time for developing skills beneficial for them and not for my career ..I think if I will spend more time in the languages I know which are right now in good demand in this industry I can get better opportunity and pay.




      Actually them exposing you to the different tools might actually make you discover a hidden talent or understand how other platforms work - giving you a huge advantage over your competition and peers. "I think if I will spend more time in the languages I know which are right now in good demand in this industry I can get better opportunity and pay." - anyone in the industry would take a flexible developer who was good at coding rather than someone who can only do one platform or tool well. A great developer is not only purely measured by the knowledge of the framework or tooling they're on, but also how well they interact with their team, what methodologies they know, and how they write code.



      Languages, frameworks, and tools change so often that you should focus on the goal you are achieving in the work they're giving you, rather than the chosen tooling or language.







      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Andrew Grosner is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer






      New contributor




      Andrew Grosner is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      answered 2 days ago









      Andrew GrosnerAndrew Grosner

      1812




      1812




      New contributor




      Andrew Grosner is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Andrew Grosner is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Andrew Grosner is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      • 1





        +1 for "anyone in the industry would take a flexible developer who was good at coding rather than someone who can only do one platform or tool well."

        – Ilmari Karonen
        2 days ago












      • 1





        +1 for "anyone in the industry would take a flexible developer who was good at coding rather than someone who can only do one platform or tool well."

        – Ilmari Karonen
        2 days ago







      1




      1





      +1 for "anyone in the industry would take a flexible developer who was good at coding rather than someone who can only do one platform or tool well."

      – Ilmari Karonen
      2 days ago





      +1 for "anyone in the industry would take a flexible developer who was good at coding rather than someone who can only do one platform or tool well."

      – Ilmari Karonen
      2 days ago











      3














      I want to concur with the other people who have pointed out the technical aspects of your problem: learning new languages quickly is one of the most important skills you will ever develop as a modern software engineer. From my perspective, every language is just a different library of syntactic sugar. They invariably make some tasks simpler at the cost of making other tasks more involved. Therefore, learning new languages is no different from learning new APIs and libraries. And the better someone like you or me is at leveraging existing tools, the more productive we become. If we consider the fact that these days new, powerful tools are being created and shared everyday, the dramatic advantage of a developer who can identify the right tools and leverage them for faster development becomes (to me) the single most important trait for being a good peogrammer.



      Although there are "C wizards" and other incredibly specialized individuals in this industry, the most productive software engineer will, in my mind, be the one that writes the least code, and lets the right language and library do the rest.






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Jonathan Jou is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.
























        3














        I want to concur with the other people who have pointed out the technical aspects of your problem: learning new languages quickly is one of the most important skills you will ever develop as a modern software engineer. From my perspective, every language is just a different library of syntactic sugar. They invariably make some tasks simpler at the cost of making other tasks more involved. Therefore, learning new languages is no different from learning new APIs and libraries. And the better someone like you or me is at leveraging existing tools, the more productive we become. If we consider the fact that these days new, powerful tools are being created and shared everyday, the dramatic advantage of a developer who can identify the right tools and leverage them for faster development becomes (to me) the single most important trait for being a good peogrammer.



        Although there are "C wizards" and other incredibly specialized individuals in this industry, the most productive software engineer will, in my mind, be the one that writes the least code, and lets the right language and library do the rest.






        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Jonathan Jou is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          3












          3








          3







          I want to concur with the other people who have pointed out the technical aspects of your problem: learning new languages quickly is one of the most important skills you will ever develop as a modern software engineer. From my perspective, every language is just a different library of syntactic sugar. They invariably make some tasks simpler at the cost of making other tasks more involved. Therefore, learning new languages is no different from learning new APIs and libraries. And the better someone like you or me is at leveraging existing tools, the more productive we become. If we consider the fact that these days new, powerful tools are being created and shared everyday, the dramatic advantage of a developer who can identify the right tools and leverage them for faster development becomes (to me) the single most important trait for being a good peogrammer.



          Although there are "C wizards" and other incredibly specialized individuals in this industry, the most productive software engineer will, in my mind, be the one that writes the least code, and lets the right language and library do the rest.






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Jonathan Jou is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.










          I want to concur with the other people who have pointed out the technical aspects of your problem: learning new languages quickly is one of the most important skills you will ever develop as a modern software engineer. From my perspective, every language is just a different library of syntactic sugar. They invariably make some tasks simpler at the cost of making other tasks more involved. Therefore, learning new languages is no different from learning new APIs and libraries. And the better someone like you or me is at leveraging existing tools, the more productive we become. If we consider the fact that these days new, powerful tools are being created and shared everyday, the dramatic advantage of a developer who can identify the right tools and leverage them for faster development becomes (to me) the single most important trait for being a good peogrammer.



          Although there are "C wizards" and other incredibly specialized individuals in this industry, the most productive software engineer will, in my mind, be the one that writes the least code, and lets the right language and library do the rest.







          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Jonathan Jou is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer






          New contributor




          Jonathan Jou is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          answered 2 days ago









          Jonathan JouJonathan Jou

          311




          311




          New contributor




          Jonathan Jou is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          New contributor





          Jonathan Jou is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          Jonathan Jou is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





















              2














              So I wanted to point out that a lot of people saying you should be honored and that what is happening is good are only speaking bs. Realistically, you should want your job to be stuff you like, otherwise you have to deal with that daily and it makes your life worse. I would recommend asking if you could just focus on your current languages, and state that that would be a much greater asset to the company, as you can be great at those languages, and you won't screw up. Say this kindly though, and if they refuse, you can always start looking for another job. Companies shouldn't hire you for one thing and expect you to do something else. That's complete bs. If it isn't specifically listed as something you had to do when you got your current role, then you don't have to do it.



              Edit: This is looking at the situation in a corporate manner, but from a programming perspective, you still might wanna know more languages if they are super close bound to what you know or are always required for what you do. That being said, they might have teams for other languages, but for example, if you know HTML and JavaScript, it would be best you know CSS (this is just an example).






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              LimeCyborg is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.















              • 3





                Technically, you're not wrong. (Well, except maybe about hiring someone to do one thing and then asking them to do something else. Companies do that all the time, because their needs change and it's cheaper and easier than firing the first guy and hiring someone else to replace them.) But I don't think this is good advice for the OP. A programmer who only knows one language (or two or three) is like a carpenter who only knows how to use one tool -- not completely useless, but also not what most employers are looking for, especially not for senior positions.

                – Ilmari Karonen
                2 days ago







              • 1





                The thing is, programming languages aren't anything special. If you're not willing to work with different languages, are you also unwilling to work on different projects (written in different ways), adopting new development practices, working with other people's code, using the right tools for the job (tough if you only know one)...? This is problematic enough for a senior, but outright suicidal for a recent graduate - it just makes you look like someone who highly overestimates their own skills and contributions, inflexible, with an inflated ego. Bad all around.

                – Luaan
                2 days ago















              2














              So I wanted to point out that a lot of people saying you should be honored and that what is happening is good are only speaking bs. Realistically, you should want your job to be stuff you like, otherwise you have to deal with that daily and it makes your life worse. I would recommend asking if you could just focus on your current languages, and state that that would be a much greater asset to the company, as you can be great at those languages, and you won't screw up. Say this kindly though, and if they refuse, you can always start looking for another job. Companies shouldn't hire you for one thing and expect you to do something else. That's complete bs. If it isn't specifically listed as something you had to do when you got your current role, then you don't have to do it.



              Edit: This is looking at the situation in a corporate manner, but from a programming perspective, you still might wanna know more languages if they are super close bound to what you know or are always required for what you do. That being said, they might have teams for other languages, but for example, if you know HTML and JavaScript, it would be best you know CSS (this is just an example).






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              LimeCyborg is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.















              • 3





                Technically, you're not wrong. (Well, except maybe about hiring someone to do one thing and then asking them to do something else. Companies do that all the time, because their needs change and it's cheaper and easier than firing the first guy and hiring someone else to replace them.) But I don't think this is good advice for the OP. A programmer who only knows one language (or two or three) is like a carpenter who only knows how to use one tool -- not completely useless, but also not what most employers are looking for, especially not for senior positions.

                – Ilmari Karonen
                2 days ago







              • 1





                The thing is, programming languages aren't anything special. If you're not willing to work with different languages, are you also unwilling to work on different projects (written in different ways), adopting new development practices, working with other people's code, using the right tools for the job (tough if you only know one)...? This is problematic enough for a senior, but outright suicidal for a recent graduate - it just makes you look like someone who highly overestimates their own skills and contributions, inflexible, with an inflated ego. Bad all around.

                – Luaan
                2 days ago













              2












              2








              2







              So I wanted to point out that a lot of people saying you should be honored and that what is happening is good are only speaking bs. Realistically, you should want your job to be stuff you like, otherwise you have to deal with that daily and it makes your life worse. I would recommend asking if you could just focus on your current languages, and state that that would be a much greater asset to the company, as you can be great at those languages, and you won't screw up. Say this kindly though, and if they refuse, you can always start looking for another job. Companies shouldn't hire you for one thing and expect you to do something else. That's complete bs. If it isn't specifically listed as something you had to do when you got your current role, then you don't have to do it.



              Edit: This is looking at the situation in a corporate manner, but from a programming perspective, you still might wanna know more languages if they are super close bound to what you know or are always required for what you do. That being said, they might have teams for other languages, but for example, if you know HTML and JavaScript, it would be best you know CSS (this is just an example).






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              LimeCyborg is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.










              So I wanted to point out that a lot of people saying you should be honored and that what is happening is good are only speaking bs. Realistically, you should want your job to be stuff you like, otherwise you have to deal with that daily and it makes your life worse. I would recommend asking if you could just focus on your current languages, and state that that would be a much greater asset to the company, as you can be great at those languages, and you won't screw up. Say this kindly though, and if they refuse, you can always start looking for another job. Companies shouldn't hire you for one thing and expect you to do something else. That's complete bs. If it isn't specifically listed as something you had to do when you got your current role, then you don't have to do it.



              Edit: This is looking at the situation in a corporate manner, but from a programming perspective, you still might wanna know more languages if they are super close bound to what you know or are always required for what you do. That being said, they might have teams for other languages, but for example, if you know HTML and JavaScript, it would be best you know CSS (this is just an example).







              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              LimeCyborg is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.









              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer






              New contributor




              LimeCyborg is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.









              answered Mar 17 at 16:18









              LimeCyborgLimeCyborg

              471




              471




              New contributor




              LimeCyborg is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.





              New contributor





              LimeCyborg is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.






              LimeCyborg is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.







              • 3





                Technically, you're not wrong. (Well, except maybe about hiring someone to do one thing and then asking them to do something else. Companies do that all the time, because their needs change and it's cheaper and easier than firing the first guy and hiring someone else to replace them.) But I don't think this is good advice for the OP. A programmer who only knows one language (or two or three) is like a carpenter who only knows how to use one tool -- not completely useless, but also not what most employers are looking for, especially not for senior positions.

                – Ilmari Karonen
                2 days ago







              • 1





                The thing is, programming languages aren't anything special. If you're not willing to work with different languages, are you also unwilling to work on different projects (written in different ways), adopting new development practices, working with other people's code, using the right tools for the job (tough if you only know one)...? This is problematic enough for a senior, but outright suicidal for a recent graduate - it just makes you look like someone who highly overestimates their own skills and contributions, inflexible, with an inflated ego. Bad all around.

                – Luaan
                2 days ago












              • 3





                Technically, you're not wrong. (Well, except maybe about hiring someone to do one thing and then asking them to do something else. Companies do that all the time, because their needs change and it's cheaper and easier than firing the first guy and hiring someone else to replace them.) But I don't think this is good advice for the OP. A programmer who only knows one language (or two or three) is like a carpenter who only knows how to use one tool -- not completely useless, but also not what most employers are looking for, especially not for senior positions.

                – Ilmari Karonen
                2 days ago







              • 1





                The thing is, programming languages aren't anything special. If you're not willing to work with different languages, are you also unwilling to work on different projects (written in different ways), adopting new development practices, working with other people's code, using the right tools for the job (tough if you only know one)...? This is problematic enough for a senior, but outright suicidal for a recent graduate - it just makes you look like someone who highly overestimates their own skills and contributions, inflexible, with an inflated ego. Bad all around.

                – Luaan
                2 days ago







              3




              3





              Technically, you're not wrong. (Well, except maybe about hiring someone to do one thing and then asking them to do something else. Companies do that all the time, because their needs change and it's cheaper and easier than firing the first guy and hiring someone else to replace them.) But I don't think this is good advice for the OP. A programmer who only knows one language (or two or three) is like a carpenter who only knows how to use one tool -- not completely useless, but also not what most employers are looking for, especially not for senior positions.

              – Ilmari Karonen
              2 days ago






              Technically, you're not wrong. (Well, except maybe about hiring someone to do one thing and then asking them to do something else. Companies do that all the time, because their needs change and it's cheaper and easier than firing the first guy and hiring someone else to replace them.) But I don't think this is good advice for the OP. A programmer who only knows one language (or two or three) is like a carpenter who only knows how to use one tool -- not completely useless, but also not what most employers are looking for, especially not for senior positions.

              – Ilmari Karonen
              2 days ago





              1




              1





              The thing is, programming languages aren't anything special. If you're not willing to work with different languages, are you also unwilling to work on different projects (written in different ways), adopting new development practices, working with other people's code, using the right tools for the job (tough if you only know one)...? This is problematic enough for a senior, but outright suicidal for a recent graduate - it just makes you look like someone who highly overestimates their own skills and contributions, inflexible, with an inflated ego. Bad all around.

              – Luaan
              2 days ago





              The thing is, programming languages aren't anything special. If you're not willing to work with different languages, are you also unwilling to work on different projects (written in different ways), adopting new development practices, working with other people's code, using the right tools for the job (tough if you only know one)...? This is problematic enough for a senior, but outright suicidal for a recent graduate - it just makes you look like someone who highly overestimates their own skills and contributions, inflexible, with an inflated ego. Bad all around.

              – Luaan
              2 days ago











              2














              After doing this rodeo for 20+ years I've gone through some of this.



              You have a career choice. From what you stated, you want to be a specialist in your area of choice. That's great, we need folks of all backgrounds and focus.



              What your company wants of you isn't a joke. You're not a joke because of it either. You're the programmer! They don't care or maybe even know what their options might be. They've hired you to bring solutions.



              The scale of this changes depending on if you're working at a company where their software is their business vs where software is a necessary evil to conducting their business.



              I will tell you that being a hyper focused specialist is fine and good, but your options will be very narrow.



              I've never heard anyone say being a Polyglot was a bad thing though. Learning various languages will expose you to novel algorithm approaches and different ways of solving the same problems. All knowledge is good.



              Be thirsty my friend and drink from the fire hose of knowledge!






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              Casey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.




















              • All knowledge is good. Sure, but time's limited. Jumping from medium level c# to java isn't going to teach as much as jumping from e.g c++ to haskell.

                – Joelty
                2 days ago












              • Time is the one thing that is short supply I will agree. Your point is valid but I didn't get the feeling that the op was at this level yet.

                – Casey
                yesterday















              2














              After doing this rodeo for 20+ years I've gone through some of this.



              You have a career choice. From what you stated, you want to be a specialist in your area of choice. That's great, we need folks of all backgrounds and focus.



              What your company wants of you isn't a joke. You're not a joke because of it either. You're the programmer! They don't care or maybe even know what their options might be. They've hired you to bring solutions.



              The scale of this changes depending on if you're working at a company where their software is their business vs where software is a necessary evil to conducting their business.



              I will tell you that being a hyper focused specialist is fine and good, but your options will be very narrow.



              I've never heard anyone say being a Polyglot was a bad thing though. Learning various languages will expose you to novel algorithm approaches and different ways of solving the same problems. All knowledge is good.



              Be thirsty my friend and drink from the fire hose of knowledge!






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              Casey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.




















              • All knowledge is good. Sure, but time's limited. Jumping from medium level c# to java isn't going to teach as much as jumping from e.g c++ to haskell.

                – Joelty
                2 days ago












              • Time is the one thing that is short supply I will agree. Your point is valid but I didn't get the feeling that the op was at this level yet.

                – Casey
                yesterday













              2












              2








              2







              After doing this rodeo for 20+ years I've gone through some of this.



              You have a career choice. From what you stated, you want to be a specialist in your area of choice. That's great, we need folks of all backgrounds and focus.



              What your company wants of you isn't a joke. You're not a joke because of it either. You're the programmer! They don't care or maybe even know what their options might be. They've hired you to bring solutions.



              The scale of this changes depending on if you're working at a company where their software is their business vs where software is a necessary evil to conducting their business.



              I will tell you that being a hyper focused specialist is fine and good, but your options will be very narrow.



              I've never heard anyone say being a Polyglot was a bad thing though. Learning various languages will expose you to novel algorithm approaches and different ways of solving the same problems. All knowledge is good.



              Be thirsty my friend and drink from the fire hose of knowledge!






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              Casey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.










              After doing this rodeo for 20+ years I've gone through some of this.



              You have a career choice. From what you stated, you want to be a specialist in your area of choice. That's great, we need folks of all backgrounds and focus.



              What your company wants of you isn't a joke. You're not a joke because of it either. You're the programmer! They don't care or maybe even know what their options might be. They've hired you to bring solutions.



              The scale of this changes depending on if you're working at a company where their software is their business vs where software is a necessary evil to conducting their business.



              I will tell you that being a hyper focused specialist is fine and good, but your options will be very narrow.



              I've never heard anyone say being a Polyglot was a bad thing though. Learning various languages will expose you to novel algorithm approaches and different ways of solving the same problems. All knowledge is good.



              Be thirsty my friend and drink from the fire hose of knowledge!







              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              Casey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.









              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer






              New contributor




              Casey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.









              answered 2 days ago









              CaseyCasey

              211




              211




              New contributor




              Casey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.





              New contributor





              Casey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.






              Casey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.












              • All knowledge is good. Sure, but time's limited. Jumping from medium level c# to java isn't going to teach as much as jumping from e.g c++ to haskell.

                – Joelty
                2 days ago












              • Time is the one thing that is short supply I will agree. Your point is valid but I didn't get the feeling that the op was at this level yet.

                – Casey
                yesterday

















              • All knowledge is good. Sure, but time's limited. Jumping from medium level c# to java isn't going to teach as much as jumping from e.g c++ to haskell.

                – Joelty
                2 days ago












              • Time is the one thing that is short supply I will agree. Your point is valid but I didn't get the feeling that the op was at this level yet.

                – Casey
                yesterday
















              All knowledge is good. Sure, but time's limited. Jumping from medium level c# to java isn't going to teach as much as jumping from e.g c++ to haskell.

              – Joelty
              2 days ago






              All knowledge is good. Sure, but time's limited. Jumping from medium level c# to java isn't going to teach as much as jumping from e.g c++ to haskell.

              – Joelty
              2 days ago














              Time is the one thing that is short supply I will agree. Your point is valid but I didn't get the feeling that the op was at this level yet.

              – Casey
              yesterday





              Time is the one thing that is short supply I will agree. Your point is valid but I didn't get the feeling that the op was at this level yet.

              – Casey
              yesterday











              0














              This situation sounds distinctly familiar to me.



              I've been in the enviable position for a large part of last year of being on the team's backburner, my particular speciality as an App-Developer being known to be needed, but not for a while.
              So they tasked me to upskill in Web-Development technologies and work on the company website.



              This looks great on my CV, it's a whole skillset I didn't have before and I'm glad to have it.

              As others have said, it's normal to be required to learn new skills and languages as a software developer.

              Take it as a good thing, some studios simply won't give you the opportunity.



              However, the big caveat is that they also gave me an attendant payrise to recognise my new capabilities.



              If you're learning new skills or knowledge that affect your future employment, you have leverage to ask for a payrise.



              Remember though, with rare exception, your employer will not tell you this, nor will they do it automatically.

              You need to be the one to make a case for it.






              share|improve this answer



























                0














                This situation sounds distinctly familiar to me.



                I've been in the enviable position for a large part of last year of being on the team's backburner, my particular speciality as an App-Developer being known to be needed, but not for a while.
                So they tasked me to upskill in Web-Development technologies and work on the company website.



                This looks great on my CV, it's a whole skillset I didn't have before and I'm glad to have it.

                As others have said, it's normal to be required to learn new skills and languages as a software developer.

                Take it as a good thing, some studios simply won't give you the opportunity.



                However, the big caveat is that they also gave me an attendant payrise to recognise my new capabilities.



                If you're learning new skills or knowledge that affect your future employment, you have leverage to ask for a payrise.



                Remember though, with rare exception, your employer will not tell you this, nor will they do it automatically.

                You need to be the one to make a case for it.






                share|improve this answer

























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  This situation sounds distinctly familiar to me.



                  I've been in the enviable position for a large part of last year of being on the team's backburner, my particular speciality as an App-Developer being known to be needed, but not for a while.
                  So they tasked me to upskill in Web-Development technologies and work on the company website.



                  This looks great on my CV, it's a whole skillset I didn't have before and I'm glad to have it.

                  As others have said, it's normal to be required to learn new skills and languages as a software developer.

                  Take it as a good thing, some studios simply won't give you the opportunity.



                  However, the big caveat is that they also gave me an attendant payrise to recognise my new capabilities.



                  If you're learning new skills or knowledge that affect your future employment, you have leverage to ask for a payrise.



                  Remember though, with rare exception, your employer will not tell you this, nor will they do it automatically.

                  You need to be the one to make a case for it.






                  share|improve this answer













                  This situation sounds distinctly familiar to me.



                  I've been in the enviable position for a large part of last year of being on the team's backburner, my particular speciality as an App-Developer being known to be needed, but not for a while.
                  So they tasked me to upskill in Web-Development technologies and work on the company website.



                  This looks great on my CV, it's a whole skillset I didn't have before and I'm glad to have it.

                  As others have said, it's normal to be required to learn new skills and languages as a software developer.

                  Take it as a good thing, some studios simply won't give you the opportunity.



                  However, the big caveat is that they also gave me an attendant payrise to recognise my new capabilities.



                  If you're learning new skills or knowledge that affect your future employment, you have leverage to ask for a payrise.



                  Remember though, with rare exception, your employer will not tell you this, nor will they do it automatically.

                  You need to be the one to make a case for it.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 2 days ago









                  Ruadhan2300Ruadhan2300

                  5006




                  5006















                      protected by Community 2 days ago



                      Thank you for your interest in this question.
                      Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



                      Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Luettelo Yhdysvaltain laivaston lentotukialuksista Lähteet | Navigointivalikko

                      Adding axes to figuresAdding axes labels to LaTeX figuresLaTeX equivalent of ConTeXt buffersRotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?adding axes to shapesAlign axes across subfiguresAdding figures with a certain orderLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themAdding axes labels to LaTeX figures

                      Gary (muusikko) Sisällysluettelo Historia | Rockin' High | Lähteet | Aiheesta muualla | NavigointivalikkoInfobox OKTuomas "Gary" Keskinen Ancaran kitaristiksiProjekti Rockin' High