Why is there so much iron?Origin of elements heavier than Iron (Fe)What happens to the neighboring star of a type Ia supernova?New Type of Type Ia supernova. Implications to Dark Energy measurement?What prevents a star from collapsing after stellar death?A Theory of Almost Everything?Type II supernovae explosionsHow do scientists know Iron-60 is created during supernovae?Can nuclear fusion alone account for the energy output from type 1a supernova?Why do neutron stars fed by another star not produce a second supernova like white dwarf supernovae?Why does a star with its core collapsing and about to undergo a supernova, explode, instead of rapidly collapsing all of its matter into a black hole?
Why does the Persian emissary display a string of crowned skulls?
I keep switching characters, how do I stop?
Can a Knock spell open the door to Mordenkainen's Magnificent Mansion?
Did I make a mistake by ccing email to boss to others?
Showing mass murder in a kid's book
How to preserve electronics (computers, iPads and phones) for hundreds of years
Extracting patterns from a text
When and why was runway 07/25 at Kai Tak removed?
PTIJ: Which Dr. Seuss books should one obtain?
How do I prevent inappropriate ads from appearing in my game?
changing the position of rows and columns in a matrix
How to make money from a browser who sees 5 seconds into the future of any web page?
win_unzip does not extract file
Why didn't Voldemort know what Grindelwald looked like?
Do I have to take mana from my deck or hand when tapping a dual land?
spatio or spatial
How to split IPA spelling into syllables
Can I say "fingers" when referring to toes?
Animation: customize bounce interpolation
Can I cause damage to electrical appliances by unplugging them when they are turned on?
Weird lines in Microsoft Word
Why would five hundred and five be same as one?
Would a primitive species be able to learn English from reading books alone?
How do i tell my boss that i'm quitting in 15 days (a colleague left this week)
Why is there so much iron?
Origin of elements heavier than Iron (Fe)What happens to the neighboring star of a type Ia supernova?New Type of Type Ia supernova. Implications to Dark Energy measurement?What prevents a star from collapsing after stellar death?A Theory of Almost Everything?Type II supernovae explosionsHow do scientists know Iron-60 is created during supernovae?Can nuclear fusion alone account for the energy output from type 1a supernova?Why do neutron stars fed by another star not produce a second supernova like white dwarf supernovae?Why does a star with its core collapsing and about to undergo a supernova, explode, instead of rapidly collapsing all of its matter into a black hole?
$begingroup$
We all know where iron comes from. However, as I am reading up on supernovas, I started to wonder why there is as much iron as there is in the universe.
Neither brown dwarfs nor white dwarfs deposit iron.
Type I supernovas leave no remnant so I can see where there would be iron released.
Type II supernovas leave either a neutron star or a black hole. As I understand it, the iron ash core collapses and the shock wave blows the rest of the star apart. Therefore no iron is released. (I know some would be made in the explosion along with all of the elements up to uranium. But would that account for all of the iron in the universe?)
Hypernovas will deposit iron, but they seem to be really rare.
Do Type I supernovas happen so frequently that iron is this common? Or am I missing something?
astrophysics astronomy supernova
edited 2 days ago
Rodrigo de Azevedo
1617
asked Mar 17 at 1:43
RickRick
578113
$endgroup$
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
We all know where iron comes from. However, as I am reading up on supernovas, I started to wonder why there is as much iron as there is in the universe.
Neither brown dwarfs nor white dwarfs deposit iron.
Type I supernovas leave no remnant so I can see where there would be iron released.
Type II supernovas leave either a neutron star or a black hole. As I understand it, the iron ash core collapses and the shock wave blows the rest of the star apart. Therefore no iron is released. (I know some would be made in the explosion along with all of the elements up to uranium. But would that account for all of the iron in the universe?)
Hypernovas will deposit iron, but they seem to be really rare.
Do Type I supernovas happen so frequently that iron is this common? Or am I missing something?
astrophysics astronomy supernova
edited 2 days ago
Rodrigo de Azevedo
1617
asked Mar 17 at 1:43
RickRick
578113
$endgroup$
11
$begingroup$
Therefore no iron is released. are you sure?
$endgroup$
– Kyle Kanos
Mar 17 at 1:47
3
$begingroup$
This table in Wikipedia's "Nucleosynthesis" article might help, detailed here.
$endgroup$
– Nat
Mar 17 at 2:15
2
$begingroup$
I would disagree with you... There is a LOT of iron, almost as much as Oxygen and Carbon (as well as silicon)...en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nucleosynthesis#/media/…
$endgroup$
– Rick
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@Jepsilon Specifically, Ni-62 is the peak. However, iron is easier to produce, so while Ni-62 is (very very slightly) more stable, there's more iron. Binding energy isn't everything - after all, most of the visible matter in the universe is still hydrogen, which is a stable element with (one of?) the highest energy per nucleon.
$endgroup$
– Luaan
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
Also, type Ia supernovae leave no remnant. Most type Ib and Ic supernovae do leave a remnant, just like most type II supernovae do. (Exceptions are the rare Ib/Ic/II supernovae resulting from pair-production-triggered instability, which leave no remnants.)
$endgroup$
– Sean
yesterday
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
We all know where iron comes from. However, as I am reading up on supernovas, I started to wonder why there is as much iron as there is in the universe.
Neither brown dwarfs nor white dwarfs deposit iron.
Type I supernovas leave no remnant so I can see where there would be iron released.
Type II supernovas leave either a neutron star or a black hole. As I understand it, the iron ash core collapses and the shock wave blows the rest of the star apart. Therefore no iron is released. (I know some would be made in the explosion along with all of the elements up to uranium. But would that account for all of the iron in the universe?)
Hypernovas will deposit iron, but they seem to be really rare.
Do Type I supernovas happen so frequently that iron is this common? Or am I missing something?
astrophysics astronomy supernova
edited 2 days ago
Rodrigo de Azevedo
1617
asked Mar 17 at 1:43
RickRick
578113
$endgroup$
We all know where iron comes from. However, as I am reading up on supernovas, I started to wonder why there is as much iron as there is in the universe.
Neither brown dwarfs nor white dwarfs deposit iron.
Type I supernovas leave no remnant so I can see where there would be iron released.
Type II supernovas leave either a neutron star or a black hole. As I understand it, the iron ash core collapses and the shock wave blows the rest of the star apart. Therefore no iron is released. (I know some would be made in the explosion along with all of the elements up to uranium. But would that account for all of the iron in the universe?)
Hypernovas will deposit iron, but they seem to be really rare.
Do Type I supernovas happen so frequently that iron is this common? Or am I missing something?
astrophysics astronomy supernova
astrophysics astronomy supernova
edited 2 days ago
Rodrigo de Azevedo
1617
asked Mar 17 at 1:43
RickRick
578113
edited 2 days ago
Rodrigo de Azevedo
1617
asked Mar 17 at 1:43
RickRick
578113
edited 2 days ago
Rodrigo de Azevedo
1617
edited 2 days ago
Rodrigo de Azevedo
1617
edited 2 days ago
Rodrigo de Azevedo
1617
1617
asked Mar 17 at 1:43
RickRick
578113
asked Mar 17 at 1:43
RickRick
578113
asked Mar 17 at 1:43
RickRick
578113
578113
11
$begingroup$
Therefore no iron is released. are you sure?
$endgroup$
– Kyle Kanos
Mar 17 at 1:47
3
$begingroup$
This table in Wikipedia's "Nucleosynthesis" article might help, detailed here.
$endgroup$
– Nat
Mar 17 at 2:15
2
$begingroup$
I would disagree with you... There is a LOT of iron, almost as much as Oxygen and Carbon (as well as silicon)...en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nucleosynthesis#/media/…
$endgroup$
– Rick
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@Jepsilon Specifically, Ni-62 is the peak. However, iron is easier to produce, so while Ni-62 is (very very slightly) more stable, there's more iron. Binding energy isn't everything - after all, most of the visible matter in the universe is still hydrogen, which is a stable element with (one of?) the highest energy per nucleon.
$endgroup$
– Luaan
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
Also, type Ia supernovae leave no remnant. Most type Ib and Ic supernovae do leave a remnant, just like most type II supernovae do. (Exceptions are the rare Ib/Ic/II supernovae resulting from pair-production-triggered instability, which leave no remnants.)
$endgroup$
– Sean
yesterday
|
show 4 more comments
11
$begingroup$
Therefore no iron is released. are you sure?
$endgroup$
– Kyle Kanos
Mar 17 at 1:47
3
$begingroup$
This table in Wikipedia's "Nucleosynthesis" article might help, detailed here.
$endgroup$
– Nat
Mar 17 at 2:15
2
$begingroup$
I would disagree with you... There is a LOT of iron, almost as much as Oxygen and Carbon (as well as silicon)...en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nucleosynthesis#/media/…
$endgroup$
– Rick
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@Jepsilon Specifically, Ni-62 is the peak. However, iron is easier to produce, so while Ni-62 is (very very slightly) more stable, there's more iron. Binding energy isn't everything - after all, most of the visible matter in the universe is still hydrogen, which is a stable element with (one of?) the highest energy per nucleon.
$endgroup$
– Luaan
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
Also, type Ia supernovae leave no remnant. Most type Ib and Ic supernovae do leave a remnant, just like most type II supernovae do. (Exceptions are the rare Ib/Ic/II supernovae resulting from pair-production-triggered instability, which leave no remnants.)
$endgroup$
– Sean
yesterday
11
11
$begingroup$
Therefore no iron is released. are you sure?
$endgroup$
– Kyle Kanos
Mar 17 at 1:47
$begingroup$
Therefore no iron is released. are you sure?
$endgroup$
– Kyle Kanos
Mar 17 at 1:47
3
3
$begingroup$
This table in Wikipedia's "Nucleosynthesis" article might help, detailed here.
$endgroup$
– Nat
Mar 17 at 2:15
$begingroup$
This table in Wikipedia's "Nucleosynthesis" article might help, detailed here.
$endgroup$
– Nat
Mar 17 at 2:15
2
2
$begingroup$
I would disagree with you... There is a LOT of iron, almost as much as Oxygen and Carbon (as well as silicon)...en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nucleosynthesis#/media/…
$endgroup$
– Rick
2 days ago
$begingroup$
I would disagree with you... There is a LOT of iron, almost as much as Oxygen and Carbon (as well as silicon)...en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nucleosynthesis#/media/…
$endgroup$
– Rick
2 days ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@Jepsilon Specifically, Ni-62 is the peak. However, iron is easier to produce, so while Ni-62 is (very very slightly) more stable, there's more iron. Binding energy isn't everything - after all, most of the visible matter in the universe is still hydrogen, which is a stable element with (one of?) the highest energy per nucleon.
$endgroup$
– Luaan
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@Jepsilon Specifically, Ni-62 is the peak. However, iron is easier to produce, so while Ni-62 is (very very slightly) more stable, there's more iron. Binding energy isn't everything - after all, most of the visible matter in the universe is still hydrogen, which is a stable element with (one of?) the highest energy per nucleon.
$endgroup$
– Luaan
2 days ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Also, type Ia supernovae leave no remnant. Most type Ib and Ic supernovae do leave a remnant, just like most type II supernovae do. (Exceptions are the rare Ib/Ic/II supernovae resulting from pair-production-triggered instability, which leave no remnants.)
$endgroup$
– Sean
yesterday
$begingroup$
Also, type Ia supernovae leave no remnant. Most type Ib and Ic supernovae do leave a remnant, just like most type II supernovae do. (Exceptions are the rare Ib/Ic/II supernovae resulting from pair-production-triggered instability, which leave no remnants.)
$endgroup$
– Sean
yesterday
|
show 4 more comments
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The solar abundance of iron is a little bit more than a thousandth by mass. If we assume that all the baryonic mass in the disc of the Galaxy (a few $10^10$ solar masses) is polluted in the same way, then more than 10 million solar masses of iron must have been produced and distributed by stars.
A type Ia supernova results in something like 0.5-1 solar masses of iron (via decaying Ni 56), thus requiring about 20-50 million type Ia supernovae to explain all the Galactic Fe.
Given the age of the Galaxy of 10 billion years, this requires a type Ia supernova rate of one every 200-500 years.
The rate of type Ia supernovae in our Galaxy is not observationally measured, though there have likely been several in the last 1000 years. The rate above seems entirely plausible and was probably higher in the past.
answered Mar 17 at 8:32
Rob JeffriesRob Jeffries
69.8k7140240
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
On an important side note: Iron has one of the largest nuclear binding energies (See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…). So eventually, the percentage of iron in the universe will increase with time, as it is a stable end-product of both nuclear fusion and nuclear decay.
$endgroup$
– Robert Tausig
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@RobertTausig doesn't iron have THE largest nuclear binding energy (rather than just "one of the largest")?
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Rob, I like your answer. Perhaps it could be even better if you include an approximate rate of double neutron star mergers (which of course the rate is very uncertain but we know that such mergers produce lots of heavy elements) ? Such a NS-NS rate is expected to be at least on the same order as that of supernovae.
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
2 days ago
11
$begingroup$
@N.Steinle The Q asks whether type Ia supernovae can be responsible for all the iron. Neutron star mergers do not produce iron. Iron does have "one of the largest" binding energies per nucleon. It is not the largest. That would be Ni 62.
$endgroup$
– Rob Jeffries
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Thank you very much for clarifying!
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Iron comes from exploding white dwarfs and exploding massive stars(Wikipedia).
(One of many amazing images by Cmglee )
Periodic table showing the cosmogenic origin of each element. Elements from carbon up to sulfur may be made in small stars by the alpha process. Elements beyond iron are made in large stars with slow neutron capture (s-process), followed by expulsion to space in gas ejections (see planetary nebulae). Elements heavier than iron may be made in neutron star mergers or supernovae after the r-process, involving a dense burst of neutrons and rapid capture by the element.
answered 2 days ago
Keith McClaryKeith McClary
1,317411
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
While this may answer the question, it is preferable to have the content of the link copied into the post to avoid issues such s link rot, going off-site, etc.
$endgroup$
– Kyle Kanos
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The nucleosynthesis in the inner of the stars generates energy: The huge amounts of energy form Helium from hydrogen. The star then start generating carbon from helium and so an. This finishes with iron. To generate with larger atomic numbers the star needs more energy. Most of them are generated in supernovae, where there is a lot more energy.
edited 2 days ago
Minijack
1032
answered Mar 17 at 5:46
Uwe PilzUwe Pilz
817
New contributor
Uwe Pilz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Iron is at the minimum point for energy release from fusion. For all atomic numbers less than that of iron, there is a net release of energy as additional protons and neutrons are added. Beyond iron, it's the reverse; energy must be input to fuse protons and neutrons into larger nuclei, which is why larger nuclei are only formed in supernova-type events and larger nuclei release energy on fission. As long as there are conditions to drive these processes, the tendency will be to build smaller nuclei up to iron and split larger nuclei down toward iron.
answered 2 days ago
Anthony XAnthony X
2,78611220
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
True, but not what the Rick is asking about. He's not concerned with how iron is produced, but how it's distributed - that is, how it gets into interstellar space and (eventually) other stars and planets.
$endgroup$
– Luaan
2 days ago
$begingroup$
"which is why larger nuclei are only formed in supernova-type events". Not true.
$endgroup$
– Rob Jeffries
2 days ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466889%2fwhy-is-there-so-much-iron%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The solar abundance of iron is a little bit more than a thousandth by mass. If we assume that all the baryonic mass in the disc of the Galaxy (a few $10^10$ solar masses) is polluted in the same way, then more than 10 million solar masses of iron must have been produced and distributed by stars.
A type Ia supernova results in something like 0.5-1 solar masses of iron (via decaying Ni 56), thus requiring about 20-50 million type Ia supernovae to explain all the Galactic Fe.
Given the age of the Galaxy of 10 billion years, this requires a type Ia supernova rate of one every 200-500 years.
The rate of type Ia supernovae in our Galaxy is not observationally measured, though there have likely been several in the last 1000 years. The rate above seems entirely plausible and was probably higher in the past.
answered Mar 17 at 8:32
Rob JeffriesRob Jeffries
69.8k7140240
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
On an important side note: Iron has one of the largest nuclear binding energies (See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…). So eventually, the percentage of iron in the universe will increase with time, as it is a stable end-product of both nuclear fusion and nuclear decay.
$endgroup$
– Robert Tausig
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@RobertTausig doesn't iron have THE largest nuclear binding energy (rather than just "one of the largest")?
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Rob, I like your answer. Perhaps it could be even better if you include an approximate rate of double neutron star mergers (which of course the rate is very uncertain but we know that such mergers produce lots of heavy elements) ? Such a NS-NS rate is expected to be at least on the same order as that of supernovae.
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
2 days ago
11
$begingroup$
@N.Steinle The Q asks whether type Ia supernovae can be responsible for all the iron. Neutron star mergers do not produce iron. Iron does have "one of the largest" binding energies per nucleon. It is not the largest. That would be Ni 62.
$endgroup$
– Rob Jeffries
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Thank you very much for clarifying!
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The solar abundance of iron is a little bit more than a thousandth by mass. If we assume that all the baryonic mass in the disc of the Galaxy (a few $10^10$ solar masses) is polluted in the same way, then more than 10 million solar masses of iron must have been produced and distributed by stars.
A type Ia supernova results in something like 0.5-1 solar masses of iron (via decaying Ni 56), thus requiring about 20-50 million type Ia supernovae to explain all the Galactic Fe.
Given the age of the Galaxy of 10 billion years, this requires a type Ia supernova rate of one every 200-500 years.
The rate of type Ia supernovae in our Galaxy is not observationally measured, though there have likely been several in the last 1000 years. The rate above seems entirely plausible and was probably higher in the past.
answered Mar 17 at 8:32
Rob JeffriesRob Jeffries
69.8k7140240
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
On an important side note: Iron has one of the largest nuclear binding energies (See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…). So eventually, the percentage of iron in the universe will increase with time, as it is a stable end-product of both nuclear fusion and nuclear decay.
$endgroup$
– Robert Tausig
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@RobertTausig doesn't iron have THE largest nuclear binding energy (rather than just "one of the largest")?
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Rob, I like your answer. Perhaps it could be even better if you include an approximate rate of double neutron star mergers (which of course the rate is very uncertain but we know that such mergers produce lots of heavy elements) ? Such a NS-NS rate is expected to be at least on the same order as that of supernovae.
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
2 days ago
11
$begingroup$
@N.Steinle The Q asks whether type Ia supernovae can be responsible for all the iron. Neutron star mergers do not produce iron. Iron does have "one of the largest" binding energies per nucleon. It is not the largest. That would be Ni 62.
$endgroup$
– Rob Jeffries
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Thank you very much for clarifying!
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The solar abundance of iron is a little bit more than a thousandth by mass. If we assume that all the baryonic mass in the disc of the Galaxy (a few $10^10$ solar masses) is polluted in the same way, then more than 10 million solar masses of iron must have been produced and distributed by stars.
A type Ia supernova results in something like 0.5-1 solar masses of iron (via decaying Ni 56), thus requiring about 20-50 million type Ia supernovae to explain all the Galactic Fe.
Given the age of the Galaxy of 10 billion years, this requires a type Ia supernova rate of one every 200-500 years.
The rate of type Ia supernovae in our Galaxy is not observationally measured, though there have likely been several in the last 1000 years. The rate above seems entirely plausible and was probably higher in the past.
answered Mar 17 at 8:32
Rob JeffriesRob Jeffries
69.8k7140240
$endgroup$
The solar abundance of iron is a little bit more than a thousandth by mass. If we assume that all the baryonic mass in the disc of the Galaxy (a few $10^10$ solar masses) is polluted in the same way, then more than 10 million solar masses of iron must have been produced and distributed by stars.
A type Ia supernova results in something like 0.5-1 solar masses of iron (via decaying Ni 56), thus requiring about 20-50 million type Ia supernovae to explain all the Galactic Fe.
Given the age of the Galaxy of 10 billion years, this requires a type Ia supernova rate of one every 200-500 years.
The rate of type Ia supernovae in our Galaxy is not observationally measured, though there have likely been several in the last 1000 years. The rate above seems entirely plausible and was probably higher in the past.
answered Mar 17 at 8:32
Rob JeffriesRob Jeffries
69.8k7140240
answered Mar 17 at 8:32
Rob JeffriesRob Jeffries
69.8k7140240
answered Mar 17 at 8:32
Rob JeffriesRob Jeffries
69.8k7140240
answered Mar 17 at 8:32
Rob JeffriesRob Jeffries
69.8k7140240
69.8k7140240
3
$begingroup$
On an important side note: Iron has one of the largest nuclear binding energies (See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…). So eventually, the percentage of iron in the universe will increase with time, as it is a stable end-product of both nuclear fusion and nuclear decay.
$endgroup$
– Robert Tausig
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@RobertTausig doesn't iron have THE largest nuclear binding energy (rather than just "one of the largest")?
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Rob, I like your answer. Perhaps it could be even better if you include an approximate rate of double neutron star mergers (which of course the rate is very uncertain but we know that such mergers produce lots of heavy elements) ? Such a NS-NS rate is expected to be at least on the same order as that of supernovae.
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
2 days ago
11
$begingroup$
@N.Steinle The Q asks whether type Ia supernovae can be responsible for all the iron. Neutron star mergers do not produce iron. Iron does have "one of the largest" binding energies per nucleon. It is not the largest. That would be Ni 62.
$endgroup$
– Rob Jeffries
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Thank you very much for clarifying!
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
2 days ago
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
On an important side note: Iron has one of the largest nuclear binding energies (See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…). So eventually, the percentage of iron in the universe will increase with time, as it is a stable end-product of both nuclear fusion and nuclear decay.
$endgroup$
– Robert Tausig
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@RobertTausig doesn't iron have THE largest nuclear binding energy (rather than just "one of the largest")?
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Rob, I like your answer. Perhaps it could be even better if you include an approximate rate of double neutron star mergers (which of course the rate is very uncertain but we know that such mergers produce lots of heavy elements) ? Such a NS-NS rate is expected to be at least on the same order as that of supernovae.
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
2 days ago
11
$begingroup$
@N.Steinle The Q asks whether type Ia supernovae can be responsible for all the iron. Neutron star mergers do not produce iron. Iron does have "one of the largest" binding energies per nucleon. It is not the largest. That would be Ni 62.
$endgroup$
– Rob Jeffries
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Thank you very much for clarifying!
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
2 days ago
3
3
$begingroup$
On an important side note: Iron has one of the largest nuclear binding energies (See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…). So eventually, the percentage of iron in the universe will increase with time, as it is a stable end-product of both nuclear fusion and nuclear decay.
$endgroup$
– Robert Tausig
2 days ago
$begingroup$
On an important side note: Iron has one of the largest nuclear binding energies (See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…). So eventually, the percentage of iron in the universe will increase with time, as it is a stable end-product of both nuclear fusion and nuclear decay.
$endgroup$
– Robert Tausig
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@RobertTausig doesn't iron have THE largest nuclear binding energy (rather than just "one of the largest")?
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@RobertTausig doesn't iron have THE largest nuclear binding energy (rather than just "one of the largest")?
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Rob, I like your answer. Perhaps it could be even better if you include an approximate rate of double neutron star mergers (which of course the rate is very uncertain but we know that such mergers produce lots of heavy elements) ? Such a NS-NS rate is expected to be at least on the same order as that of supernovae.
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Rob, I like your answer. Perhaps it could be even better if you include an approximate rate of double neutron star mergers (which of course the rate is very uncertain but we know that such mergers produce lots of heavy elements) ? Such a NS-NS rate is expected to be at least on the same order as that of supernovae.
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
2 days ago
11
11
$begingroup$
@N.Steinle The Q asks whether type Ia supernovae can be responsible for all the iron. Neutron star mergers do not produce iron. Iron does have "one of the largest" binding energies per nucleon. It is not the largest. That would be Ni 62.
$endgroup$
– Rob Jeffries
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@N.Steinle The Q asks whether type Ia supernovae can be responsible for all the iron. Neutron star mergers do not produce iron. Iron does have "one of the largest" binding energies per nucleon. It is not the largest. That would be Ni 62.
$endgroup$
– Rob Jeffries
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Thank you very much for clarifying!
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Thank you very much for clarifying!
$endgroup$
– N. Steinle
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Iron comes from exploding white dwarfs and exploding massive stars(Wikipedia).
(One of many amazing images by Cmglee )
Periodic table showing the cosmogenic origin of each element. Elements from carbon up to sulfur may be made in small stars by the alpha process. Elements beyond iron are made in large stars with slow neutron capture (s-process), followed by expulsion to space in gas ejections (see planetary nebulae). Elements heavier than iron may be made in neutron star mergers or supernovae after the r-process, involving a dense burst of neutrons and rapid capture by the element.
answered 2 days ago
Keith McClaryKeith McClary
1,317411
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
While this may answer the question, it is preferable to have the content of the link copied into the post to avoid issues such s link rot, going off-site, etc.
$endgroup$
– Kyle Kanos
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Iron comes from exploding white dwarfs and exploding massive stars(Wikipedia).
(One of many amazing images by Cmglee )
Periodic table showing the cosmogenic origin of each element. Elements from carbon up to sulfur may be made in small stars by the alpha process. Elements beyond iron are made in large stars with slow neutron capture (s-process), followed by expulsion to space in gas ejections (see planetary nebulae). Elements heavier than iron may be made in neutron star mergers or supernovae after the r-process, involving a dense burst of neutrons and rapid capture by the element.
answered 2 days ago
Keith McClaryKeith McClary
1,317411
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
While this may answer the question, it is preferable to have the content of the link copied into the post to avoid issues such s link rot, going off-site, etc.
$endgroup$
– Kyle Kanos
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Iron comes from exploding white dwarfs and exploding massive stars(Wikipedia).
(One of many amazing images by Cmglee )
Periodic table showing the cosmogenic origin of each element. Elements from carbon up to sulfur may be made in small stars by the alpha process. Elements beyond iron are made in large stars with slow neutron capture (s-process), followed by expulsion to space in gas ejections (see planetary nebulae). Elements heavier than iron may be made in neutron star mergers or supernovae after the r-process, involving a dense burst of neutrons and rapid capture by the element.
answered 2 days ago
Keith McClaryKeith McClary
1,317411
$endgroup$
Iron comes from exploding white dwarfs and exploding massive stars(Wikipedia).
(One of many amazing images by Cmglee )
Periodic table showing the cosmogenic origin of each element. Elements from carbon up to sulfur may be made in small stars by the alpha process. Elements beyond iron are made in large stars with slow neutron capture (s-process), followed by expulsion to space in gas ejections (see planetary nebulae). Elements heavier than iron may be made in neutron star mergers or supernovae after the r-process, involving a dense burst of neutrons and rapid capture by the element.
answered 2 days ago
Keith McClaryKeith McClary
1,317411
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
Keith McClaryKeith McClary
1,317411
answered 2 days ago
Keith McClaryKeith McClary
1,317411
answered 2 days ago
Keith McClaryKeith McClary
1,317411
1,317411
2
$begingroup$
While this may answer the question, it is preferable to have the content of the link copied into the post to avoid issues such s link rot, going off-site, etc.
$endgroup$
– Kyle Kanos
2 days ago
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
While this may answer the question, it is preferable to have the content of the link copied into the post to avoid issues such s link rot, going off-site, etc.
$endgroup$
– Kyle Kanos
2 days ago
2
2
$begingroup$
While this may answer the question, it is preferable to have the content of the link copied into the post to avoid issues such s link rot, going off-site, etc.
$endgroup$
– Kyle Kanos
2 days ago
$begingroup$
While this may answer the question, it is preferable to have the content of the link copied into the post to avoid issues such s link rot, going off-site, etc.
$endgroup$
– Kyle Kanos
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The nucleosynthesis in the inner of the stars generates energy: The huge amounts of energy form Helium from hydrogen. The star then start generating carbon from helium and so an. This finishes with iron. To generate with larger atomic numbers the star needs more energy. Most of them are generated in supernovae, where there is a lot more energy.
edited 2 days ago
Minijack
1032
answered Mar 17 at 5:46
Uwe PilzUwe Pilz
817
New contributor
Uwe Pilz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The nucleosynthesis in the inner of the stars generates energy: The huge amounts of energy form Helium from hydrogen. The star then start generating carbon from helium and so an. This finishes with iron. To generate with larger atomic numbers the star needs more energy. Most of them are generated in supernovae, where there is a lot more energy.
edited 2 days ago
Minijack
1032
answered Mar 17 at 5:46
Uwe PilzUwe Pilz
817
New contributor
Uwe Pilz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The nucleosynthesis in the inner of the stars generates energy: The huge amounts of energy form Helium from hydrogen. The star then start generating carbon from helium and so an. This finishes with iron. To generate with larger atomic numbers the star needs more energy. Most of them are generated in supernovae, where there is a lot more energy.
edited 2 days ago
Minijack
1032
answered Mar 17 at 5:46
Uwe PilzUwe Pilz
817
New contributor
Uwe Pilz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
The nucleosynthesis in the inner of the stars generates energy: The huge amounts of energy form Helium from hydrogen. The star then start generating carbon from helium and so an. This finishes with iron. To generate with larger atomic numbers the star needs more energy. Most of them are generated in supernovae, where there is a lot more energy.
edited 2 days ago
Minijack
1032
answered Mar 17 at 5:46
Uwe PilzUwe Pilz
817
New contributor
Uwe Pilz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 2 days ago
Minijack
1032
edited 2 days ago
Minijack
1032
edited 2 days ago
Minijack
1032
1032
answered Mar 17 at 5:46
Uwe PilzUwe Pilz
817
New contributor
Uwe Pilz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered Mar 17 at 5:46
Uwe PilzUwe Pilz
817
answered Mar 17 at 5:46
Uwe PilzUwe Pilz
817
817
New contributor
Uwe Pilz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Uwe Pilz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Uwe Pilz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Iron is at the minimum point for energy release from fusion. For all atomic numbers less than that of iron, there is a net release of energy as additional protons and neutrons are added. Beyond iron, it's the reverse; energy must be input to fuse protons and neutrons into larger nuclei, which is why larger nuclei are only formed in supernova-type events and larger nuclei release energy on fission. As long as there are conditions to drive these processes, the tendency will be to build smaller nuclei up to iron and split larger nuclei down toward iron.
answered 2 days ago
Anthony XAnthony X
2,78611220
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
True, but not what the Rick is asking about. He's not concerned with how iron is produced, but how it's distributed - that is, how it gets into interstellar space and (eventually) other stars and planets.
$endgroup$
– Luaan
2 days ago
$begingroup$
"which is why larger nuclei are only formed in supernova-type events". Not true.
$endgroup$
– Rob Jeffries
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Iron is at the minimum point for energy release from fusion. For all atomic numbers less than that of iron, there is a net release of energy as additional protons and neutrons are added. Beyond iron, it's the reverse; energy must be input to fuse protons and neutrons into larger nuclei, which is why larger nuclei are only formed in supernova-type events and larger nuclei release energy on fission. As long as there are conditions to drive these processes, the tendency will be to build smaller nuclei up to iron and split larger nuclei down toward iron.
answered 2 days ago
Anthony XAnthony X
2,78611220
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
True, but not what the Rick is asking about. He's not concerned with how iron is produced, but how it's distributed - that is, how it gets into interstellar space and (eventually) other stars and planets.
$endgroup$
– Luaan
2 days ago
$begingroup$
"which is why larger nuclei are only formed in supernova-type events". Not true.
$endgroup$
– Rob Jeffries
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Iron is at the minimum point for energy release from fusion. For all atomic numbers less than that of iron, there is a net release of energy as additional protons and neutrons are added. Beyond iron, it's the reverse; energy must be input to fuse protons and neutrons into larger nuclei, which is why larger nuclei are only formed in supernova-type events and larger nuclei release energy on fission. As long as there are conditions to drive these processes, the tendency will be to build smaller nuclei up to iron and split larger nuclei down toward iron.
answered 2 days ago
Anthony XAnthony X
2,78611220
$endgroup$
Iron is at the minimum point for energy release from fusion. For all atomic numbers less than that of iron, there is a net release of energy as additional protons and neutrons are added. Beyond iron, it's the reverse; energy must be input to fuse protons and neutrons into larger nuclei, which is why larger nuclei are only formed in supernova-type events and larger nuclei release energy on fission. As long as there are conditions to drive these processes, the tendency will be to build smaller nuclei up to iron and split larger nuclei down toward iron.
answered 2 days ago
Anthony XAnthony X
2,78611220
answered 2 days ago
Anthony XAnthony X
2,78611220
answered 2 days ago
Anthony XAnthony X
2,78611220
answered 2 days ago
Anthony XAnthony X
2,78611220
2,78611220
2
$begingroup$
True, but not what the Rick is asking about. He's not concerned with how iron is produced, but how it's distributed - that is, how it gets into interstellar space and (eventually) other stars and planets.
$endgroup$
– Luaan
2 days ago
$begingroup$
"which is why larger nuclei are only formed in supernova-type events". Not true.
$endgroup$
– Rob Jeffries
2 days ago
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
True, but not what the Rick is asking about. He's not concerned with how iron is produced, but how it's distributed - that is, how it gets into interstellar space and (eventually) other stars and planets.
$endgroup$
– Luaan
2 days ago
$begingroup$
"which is why larger nuclei are only formed in supernova-type events". Not true.
$endgroup$
– Rob Jeffries
2 days ago
2
2
$begingroup$
True, but not what the Rick is asking about. He's not concerned with how iron is produced, but how it's distributed - that is, how it gets into interstellar space and (eventually) other stars and planets.
$endgroup$
– Luaan
2 days ago
$begingroup$
True, but not what the Rick is asking about. He's not concerned with how iron is produced, but how it's distributed - that is, how it gets into interstellar space and (eventually) other stars and planets.
$endgroup$
– Luaan
2 days ago
$begingroup$
"which is why larger nuclei are only formed in supernova-type events". Not true.
$endgroup$
– Rob Jeffries
2 days ago
$begingroup$
"which is why larger nuclei are only formed in supernova-type events". Not true.
$endgroup$
– Rob Jeffries
2 days ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466889%2fwhy-is-there-so-much-iron%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
11
$begingroup$
Therefore no iron is released. are you sure?
$endgroup$
– Kyle Kanos
Mar 17 at 1:47
3
$begingroup$
This table in Wikipedia's "Nucleosynthesis" article might help, detailed here.
$endgroup$
– Nat
Mar 17 at 2:15
2
$begingroup$
I would disagree with you... There is a LOT of iron, almost as much as Oxygen and Carbon (as well as silicon)...en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nucleosynthesis#/media/…
$endgroup$
– Rick
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@Jepsilon Specifically, Ni-62 is the peak. However, iron is easier to produce, so while Ni-62 is (very very slightly) more stable, there's more iron. Binding energy isn't everything - after all, most of the visible matter in the universe is still hydrogen, which is a stable element with (one of?) the highest energy per nucleon.
$endgroup$
– Luaan
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
Also, type Ia supernovae leave no remnant. Most type Ib and Ic supernovae do leave a remnant, just like most type II supernovae do. (Exceptions are the rare Ib/Ic/II supernovae resulting from pair-production-triggered instability, which leave no remnants.)
$endgroup$
– Sean
yesterday