Modern-day genetically engineered monsters – what's possible? [closed]Genetically engineered de-evolutionHow to design Hobbit to colonize extreme planet?genetically engineered humans breathe underwater at extreme depthsAre genetically engineered wyverns with my specifications possible?Genetically-engineered extraterrestrial virusTaxonomy of genetically engineered speciesCan An Adult Be Genetically Engineered?Genetic modifications for the ultimate office drone?What (modern) weapons could be used to destroy skeletal enemies as completely as possible?Genetically engineered Moray Eel?

Do airline pilots ever risk not hearing communication directed to them specifically, from traffic controllers?

Is there a familial term for apples and pears?

Why has Russell's definition of numbers using equivalence classes been finally abandoned? ( If it has actually been abandoned).

What Brexit solution does the DUP want?

Extreme, but not acceptable situation and I can't start the work tomorrow morning

Can a German sentence have two subjects?

When blogging recipes, how can I support both readers who want the narrative/journey and ones who want the printer-friendly recipe?

New order #4: World

Example of a relative pronoun

How is it possible for user's password to be changed after storage was encrypted? (on OS X, Android)

Is there a minimum number of transactions in a block?

Copycat chess is back

Why Is Death Allowed In the Matrix?

Is Social Media Science Fiction?

Why are 150k or 200k jobs considered good when there are 300k+ births a month?

Japan - Plan around max visa duration

Circuitry of TV splitters

Could a US political party gain complete control over the government by removing checks & balances?

How to report a triplet of septets in NMR tabulation?

A function which translates a sentence to title-case

whey we use polarized capacitor?

N.B. ligature in Latex

What do you call a Matrix-like slowdown and camera movement effect?

Can an x86 CPU running in real mode be considered to be basically an 8086 CPU?



Modern-day genetically engineered monsters – what's possible? [closed]


Genetically engineered de-evolutionHow to design Hobbit to colonize extreme planet?genetically engineered humans breathe underwater at extreme depthsAre genetically engineered wyverns with my specifications possible?Genetically-engineered extraterrestrial virusTaxonomy of genetically engineered speciesCan An Adult Be Genetically Engineered?Genetic modifications for the ultimate office drone?What (modern) weapons could be used to destroy skeletal enemies as completely as possible?Genetically engineered Moray Eel?













4












$begingroup$


I'm a budding mad scientist working in my backyard, with access to about 10,000 dollars' budget, a genius aptitude for genetic engineering, and garden tools. I've got some kind of backstory to avenge, and long story short, I've decided to unleash an army of genetically engineered monsters on the world.



So what can I make? I don't have any future tools, or even the most cutting-edge gene-editing equipment (unless you think I could build it?), but I have no moral reservations about stealing, murdering, etc.



This question might sound a little too open-ended, but what I'm specifically looking for is:



  • Something deadly: it can kill humans significantly better than humans can kill humans. So, trainable intelligence, speed, strength, and sharp senses are all plusses.

  • Something controllable: it's an assassin, so I'd appreciate answers that aren't 'super smallpox' or 'birdemic.'

  • Something possible: based on existing animals, plants, bacteria, protists, etc.

What's the pièce de résistance of my arsenal?



Edit: I appreciate all answers here, but for those trying for a very scientifically accurate answer, bear in mind the square-cube law, and how it relates to just making things bigger. If you create a gorilla the size of a car, it won't pump enough blood to survive. If it's the size of a skyscraper, it will collapse into a pile of meat. Also, we don't have a lot of genetic material to make stuff bigger. Gene-editing is mostly still cut-and-paste at this stage.



Edit again:



Ok, so this has been marked as primarily opinion based and too broad. Here are some clarifications I hope will help narrow it down:



  • It should start from species that can be easily obtained by my mad scientist. So housecats, dogs, birds, mice, ants, e-coli are all accessible, but gorilla DNA is a little harder to come by.

  • I have to be able to physically gestate this thing: if the fetus isn't viable, it won't be born. Also, if the creation takes 10 years to reach adulthood, I have to wait 10 years. I would prefer not having to do that.

  • Making things really small or really big is hard. If you make an ant the size of your hand, but keep the skin the same thickness, it will pop like a bubble. If you make a housecat-sized lion, but forget to shrink 1 bone, that bone will grow through the flesh of the animal.

  • Please make answers science-based. It's fun to talk about godzilla, but that's not really feasible. Realistically, small edits are much easier than big ones. As a rule of thumb, look at how much stuff an edit affects. Breathing fire doesn't work if you're not fireproof. Laser eyes need a power source and wiring.









share|improve this question











$endgroup$



closed as too broad by Frostfyre, user535733, Cyn, Renan, JBH Mar 29 at 16:09


Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Jurassic Park Fallen Kingdom is your answer. Or did you think that was fake?
    $endgroup$
    – Trevor D
    Mar 29 at 13:05











  • $begingroup$
    This appears to fall into the high-concept category of questions. Voting to close for being too broad.
    $endgroup$
    – Frostfyre
    Mar 29 at 13:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hard to ask questions for ideas on something. It's a good question, but doesn't fit the SE one question one right answer formula. I'm not sure if there is a brainstorming SE site. But you could probably come up with a few and ask if they are viable with your restrictions.
    $endgroup$
    – Trevor D
    Mar 29 at 13:33










  • $begingroup$
    If the budget is only $10k, then it's more likely the parents' backyard. This implies additional restrictions against destroying mom's flowers or dad's seldom-used covered boat. Oh, and while you are back there, mow the lawn, will ya? I suppose this partially explains the madness....
    $endgroup$
    – user535733
    Mar 29 at 14:11











  • $begingroup$
    (a) This question can only be answered by experienced geneticists, and their answer would likely be "nothing, in the way you mean your question." (b) The help center states Qs "must be specific and answerable: What problem are you trying to solve?" This is a vague "what are the limits of our tech?" question that is at best primarily opinion-based and is at worst inviting a discussion. There are other probs, but I'm out of space.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    Mar 29 at 16:16















4












$begingroup$


I'm a budding mad scientist working in my backyard, with access to about 10,000 dollars' budget, a genius aptitude for genetic engineering, and garden tools. I've got some kind of backstory to avenge, and long story short, I've decided to unleash an army of genetically engineered monsters on the world.



So what can I make? I don't have any future tools, or even the most cutting-edge gene-editing equipment (unless you think I could build it?), but I have no moral reservations about stealing, murdering, etc.



This question might sound a little too open-ended, but what I'm specifically looking for is:



  • Something deadly: it can kill humans significantly better than humans can kill humans. So, trainable intelligence, speed, strength, and sharp senses are all plusses.

  • Something controllable: it's an assassin, so I'd appreciate answers that aren't 'super smallpox' or 'birdemic.'

  • Something possible: based on existing animals, plants, bacteria, protists, etc.

What's the pièce de résistance of my arsenal?



Edit: I appreciate all answers here, but for those trying for a very scientifically accurate answer, bear in mind the square-cube law, and how it relates to just making things bigger. If you create a gorilla the size of a car, it won't pump enough blood to survive. If it's the size of a skyscraper, it will collapse into a pile of meat. Also, we don't have a lot of genetic material to make stuff bigger. Gene-editing is mostly still cut-and-paste at this stage.



Edit again:



Ok, so this has been marked as primarily opinion based and too broad. Here are some clarifications I hope will help narrow it down:



  • It should start from species that can be easily obtained by my mad scientist. So housecats, dogs, birds, mice, ants, e-coli are all accessible, but gorilla DNA is a little harder to come by.

  • I have to be able to physically gestate this thing: if the fetus isn't viable, it won't be born. Also, if the creation takes 10 years to reach adulthood, I have to wait 10 years. I would prefer not having to do that.

  • Making things really small or really big is hard. If you make an ant the size of your hand, but keep the skin the same thickness, it will pop like a bubble. If you make a housecat-sized lion, but forget to shrink 1 bone, that bone will grow through the flesh of the animal.

  • Please make answers science-based. It's fun to talk about godzilla, but that's not really feasible. Realistically, small edits are much easier than big ones. As a rule of thumb, look at how much stuff an edit affects. Breathing fire doesn't work if you're not fireproof. Laser eyes need a power source and wiring.









share|improve this question











$endgroup$



closed as too broad by Frostfyre, user535733, Cyn, Renan, JBH Mar 29 at 16:09


Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Jurassic Park Fallen Kingdom is your answer. Or did you think that was fake?
    $endgroup$
    – Trevor D
    Mar 29 at 13:05











  • $begingroup$
    This appears to fall into the high-concept category of questions. Voting to close for being too broad.
    $endgroup$
    – Frostfyre
    Mar 29 at 13:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hard to ask questions for ideas on something. It's a good question, but doesn't fit the SE one question one right answer formula. I'm not sure if there is a brainstorming SE site. But you could probably come up with a few and ask if they are viable with your restrictions.
    $endgroup$
    – Trevor D
    Mar 29 at 13:33










  • $begingroup$
    If the budget is only $10k, then it's more likely the parents' backyard. This implies additional restrictions against destroying mom's flowers or dad's seldom-used covered boat. Oh, and while you are back there, mow the lawn, will ya? I suppose this partially explains the madness....
    $endgroup$
    – user535733
    Mar 29 at 14:11











  • $begingroup$
    (a) This question can only be answered by experienced geneticists, and their answer would likely be "nothing, in the way you mean your question." (b) The help center states Qs "must be specific and answerable: What problem are you trying to solve?" This is a vague "what are the limits of our tech?" question that is at best primarily opinion-based and is at worst inviting a discussion. There are other probs, but I'm out of space.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    Mar 29 at 16:16













4












4








4





$begingroup$


I'm a budding mad scientist working in my backyard, with access to about 10,000 dollars' budget, a genius aptitude for genetic engineering, and garden tools. I've got some kind of backstory to avenge, and long story short, I've decided to unleash an army of genetically engineered monsters on the world.



So what can I make? I don't have any future tools, or even the most cutting-edge gene-editing equipment (unless you think I could build it?), but I have no moral reservations about stealing, murdering, etc.



This question might sound a little too open-ended, but what I'm specifically looking for is:



  • Something deadly: it can kill humans significantly better than humans can kill humans. So, trainable intelligence, speed, strength, and sharp senses are all plusses.

  • Something controllable: it's an assassin, so I'd appreciate answers that aren't 'super smallpox' or 'birdemic.'

  • Something possible: based on existing animals, plants, bacteria, protists, etc.

What's the pièce de résistance of my arsenal?



Edit: I appreciate all answers here, but for those trying for a very scientifically accurate answer, bear in mind the square-cube law, and how it relates to just making things bigger. If you create a gorilla the size of a car, it won't pump enough blood to survive. If it's the size of a skyscraper, it will collapse into a pile of meat. Also, we don't have a lot of genetic material to make stuff bigger. Gene-editing is mostly still cut-and-paste at this stage.



Edit again:



Ok, so this has been marked as primarily opinion based and too broad. Here are some clarifications I hope will help narrow it down:



  • It should start from species that can be easily obtained by my mad scientist. So housecats, dogs, birds, mice, ants, e-coli are all accessible, but gorilla DNA is a little harder to come by.

  • I have to be able to physically gestate this thing: if the fetus isn't viable, it won't be born. Also, if the creation takes 10 years to reach adulthood, I have to wait 10 years. I would prefer not having to do that.

  • Making things really small or really big is hard. If you make an ant the size of your hand, but keep the skin the same thickness, it will pop like a bubble. If you make a housecat-sized lion, but forget to shrink 1 bone, that bone will grow through the flesh of the animal.

  • Please make answers science-based. It's fun to talk about godzilla, but that's not really feasible. Realistically, small edits are much easier than big ones. As a rule of thumb, look at how much stuff an edit affects. Breathing fire doesn't work if you're not fireproof. Laser eyes need a power source and wiring.









share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I'm a budding mad scientist working in my backyard, with access to about 10,000 dollars' budget, a genius aptitude for genetic engineering, and garden tools. I've got some kind of backstory to avenge, and long story short, I've decided to unleash an army of genetically engineered monsters on the world.



So what can I make? I don't have any future tools, or even the most cutting-edge gene-editing equipment (unless you think I could build it?), but I have no moral reservations about stealing, murdering, etc.



This question might sound a little too open-ended, but what I'm specifically looking for is:



  • Something deadly: it can kill humans significantly better than humans can kill humans. So, trainable intelligence, speed, strength, and sharp senses are all plusses.

  • Something controllable: it's an assassin, so I'd appreciate answers that aren't 'super smallpox' or 'birdemic.'

  • Something possible: based on existing animals, plants, bacteria, protists, etc.

What's the pièce de résistance of my arsenal?



Edit: I appreciate all answers here, but for those trying for a very scientifically accurate answer, bear in mind the square-cube law, and how it relates to just making things bigger. If you create a gorilla the size of a car, it won't pump enough blood to survive. If it's the size of a skyscraper, it will collapse into a pile of meat. Also, we don't have a lot of genetic material to make stuff bigger. Gene-editing is mostly still cut-and-paste at this stage.



Edit again:



Ok, so this has been marked as primarily opinion based and too broad. Here are some clarifications I hope will help narrow it down:



  • It should start from species that can be easily obtained by my mad scientist. So housecats, dogs, birds, mice, ants, e-coli are all accessible, but gorilla DNA is a little harder to come by.

  • I have to be able to physically gestate this thing: if the fetus isn't viable, it won't be born. Also, if the creation takes 10 years to reach adulthood, I have to wait 10 years. I would prefer not having to do that.

  • Making things really small or really big is hard. If you make an ant the size of your hand, but keep the skin the same thickness, it will pop like a bubble. If you make a housecat-sized lion, but forget to shrink 1 bone, that bone will grow through the flesh of the animal.

  • Please make answers science-based. It's fun to talk about godzilla, but that's not really feasible. Realistically, small edits are much easier than big ones. As a rule of thumb, look at how much stuff an edit affects. Breathing fire doesn't work if you're not fireproof. Laser eyes need a power source and wiring.






science-based genetic-engineering






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 29 at 13:43







Adrian Hall

















asked Mar 29 at 13:03









Adrian HallAdrian Hall

1,495115




1,495115




closed as too broad by Frostfyre, user535733, Cyn, Renan, JBH Mar 29 at 16:09


Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









closed as too broad by Frostfyre, user535733, Cyn, Renan, JBH Mar 29 at 16:09


Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Jurassic Park Fallen Kingdom is your answer. Or did you think that was fake?
    $endgroup$
    – Trevor D
    Mar 29 at 13:05











  • $begingroup$
    This appears to fall into the high-concept category of questions. Voting to close for being too broad.
    $endgroup$
    – Frostfyre
    Mar 29 at 13:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hard to ask questions for ideas on something. It's a good question, but doesn't fit the SE one question one right answer formula. I'm not sure if there is a brainstorming SE site. But you could probably come up with a few and ask if they are viable with your restrictions.
    $endgroup$
    – Trevor D
    Mar 29 at 13:33










  • $begingroup$
    If the budget is only $10k, then it's more likely the parents' backyard. This implies additional restrictions against destroying mom's flowers or dad's seldom-used covered boat. Oh, and while you are back there, mow the lawn, will ya? I suppose this partially explains the madness....
    $endgroup$
    – user535733
    Mar 29 at 14:11











  • $begingroup$
    (a) This question can only be answered by experienced geneticists, and their answer would likely be "nothing, in the way you mean your question." (b) The help center states Qs "must be specific and answerable: What problem are you trying to solve?" This is a vague "what are the limits of our tech?" question that is at best primarily opinion-based and is at worst inviting a discussion. There are other probs, but I'm out of space.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    Mar 29 at 16:16












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Jurassic Park Fallen Kingdom is your answer. Or did you think that was fake?
    $endgroup$
    – Trevor D
    Mar 29 at 13:05











  • $begingroup$
    This appears to fall into the high-concept category of questions. Voting to close for being too broad.
    $endgroup$
    – Frostfyre
    Mar 29 at 13:26






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Hard to ask questions for ideas on something. It's a good question, but doesn't fit the SE one question one right answer formula. I'm not sure if there is a brainstorming SE site. But you could probably come up with a few and ask if they are viable with your restrictions.
    $endgroup$
    – Trevor D
    Mar 29 at 13:33










  • $begingroup$
    If the budget is only $10k, then it's more likely the parents' backyard. This implies additional restrictions against destroying mom's flowers or dad's seldom-used covered boat. Oh, and while you are back there, mow the lawn, will ya? I suppose this partially explains the madness....
    $endgroup$
    – user535733
    Mar 29 at 14:11











  • $begingroup$
    (a) This question can only be answered by experienced geneticists, and their answer would likely be "nothing, in the way you mean your question." (b) The help center states Qs "must be specific and answerable: What problem are you trying to solve?" This is a vague "what are the limits of our tech?" question that is at best primarily opinion-based and is at worst inviting a discussion. There are other probs, but I'm out of space.
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    Mar 29 at 16:16







2




2




$begingroup$
Jurassic Park Fallen Kingdom is your answer. Or did you think that was fake?
$endgroup$
– Trevor D
Mar 29 at 13:05





$begingroup$
Jurassic Park Fallen Kingdom is your answer. Or did you think that was fake?
$endgroup$
– Trevor D
Mar 29 at 13:05













$begingroup$
This appears to fall into the high-concept category of questions. Voting to close for being too broad.
$endgroup$
– Frostfyre
Mar 29 at 13:26




$begingroup$
This appears to fall into the high-concept category of questions. Voting to close for being too broad.
$endgroup$
– Frostfyre
Mar 29 at 13:26




1




1




$begingroup$
Hard to ask questions for ideas on something. It's a good question, but doesn't fit the SE one question one right answer formula. I'm not sure if there is a brainstorming SE site. But you could probably come up with a few and ask if they are viable with your restrictions.
$endgroup$
– Trevor D
Mar 29 at 13:33




$begingroup$
Hard to ask questions for ideas on something. It's a good question, but doesn't fit the SE one question one right answer formula. I'm not sure if there is a brainstorming SE site. But you could probably come up with a few and ask if they are viable with your restrictions.
$endgroup$
– Trevor D
Mar 29 at 13:33












$begingroup$
If the budget is only $10k, then it's more likely the parents' backyard. This implies additional restrictions against destroying mom's flowers or dad's seldom-used covered boat. Oh, and while you are back there, mow the lawn, will ya? I suppose this partially explains the madness....
$endgroup$
– user535733
Mar 29 at 14:11





$begingroup$
If the budget is only $10k, then it's more likely the parents' backyard. This implies additional restrictions against destroying mom's flowers or dad's seldom-used covered boat. Oh, and while you are back there, mow the lawn, will ya? I suppose this partially explains the madness....
$endgroup$
– user535733
Mar 29 at 14:11













$begingroup$
(a) This question can only be answered by experienced geneticists, and their answer would likely be "nothing, in the way you mean your question." (b) The help center states Qs "must be specific and answerable: What problem are you trying to solve?" This is a vague "what are the limits of our tech?" question that is at best primarily opinion-based and is at worst inviting a discussion. There are other probs, but I'm out of space.
$endgroup$
– JBH
Mar 29 at 16:16




$begingroup$
(a) This question can only be answered by experienced geneticists, and their answer would likely be "nothing, in the way you mean your question." (b) The help center states Qs "must be specific and answerable: What problem are you trying to solve?" This is a vague "what are the limits of our tech?" question that is at best primarily opinion-based and is at worst inviting a discussion. There are other probs, but I'm out of space.
$endgroup$
– JBH
Mar 29 at 16:16










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















13












$begingroup$

Your mad scientist is going to be very disappointed when he learns we already have a genetically engineered killer.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attack_dog




Early in recorded history there are records of dogs being trained for the purpose of attacking a target.[3] One of the most well-recorded ancient uses was in a battle between the Athenians and Corinthians, in which dogs were used to keep watch over a fortress and despite being unsuccessful in opposing an enemy attack, were able to alert the sleeping soldiers to the attack. Ancient Romans first adopted the use of dogs as a weapon after hordes of dogs delayed their victory in the Battle of Vercellae. The Romans not only trained them to attack, but also bred their attack dogs for ferocity. The effect of this was documented by Roman naturalist and writer Pliny the Elder, who wrote that the animals would not back down, even when confronted by swords. The Roman attack dogs were given metal armour covered in razor-sharp spikes, designed to force the enemy out of formation.[4]



Napoleon utilised dogs for their superior senses, putting them to work
in roles similar to that of modern sentry dogs.[5] The first use of
attack dogs in the United States of America was suggested by Benjamin
Franklin.[6] In South Africa under Apartheid, the South African
Defence Force used wolf-dog hybrids as experimental attack dogs to
combat guerillas.[7]



Various modern military groups also use attack dogs, primarily for
sentry purposes. The dogs are trained to defend their post and attack
any possible intruders.[12] It is also reported that dogs have been
used in psychological torture against prisoners of war.[13]



Additionally, attack dogs are used by almost every police force in the
world for apprehending and subduing targets (see police dog). The dogs
are trained to identify situations where humans are in danger and
respond accordingly.[14] Police attack dogs are generally trained to
hold a target rather than to inflict injury. Today attack or guard
dogs with military-level training may also be used outside the
military by individuals or families. These elite dogs may cost
hundreds of thousands of U.S. dollars.[15]




Dogs have been mans best friend for a long time. So long in fact that they are key to our own evolution and our dominance over the previous race. They are our greatest creation and we engineered them ourselves over 10's of thousands of years.



They are also very trainable, loyal, and deadly.



-Responding to your edit:



For more cinematic but without semi fake science. Your 10,000 is a small amount of money. It's barely enough to even get the car you need to go pick up your science stuff for your backyard. So your best bet is to go to a dog rescue place, get some really big dogs. Then buy some aluminum and forge armor for the dogs. It should take about a year to train them to attack on command or track their targets. You can fashion the armor similar to the historic dog armor. This should give you a bullet resistant (not proof) fast killer that looks cool and is within your budget... briefly, until you have to buy dog food and find places to get rid of the excrement.



-Edit
This is actually a better wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogs_in_warfare




In ancient times, dogs, often large mastiff- or molosser-type breeds, would be strapped with armor or spiked collars and sent into battle to attack the enemy. This strategy was used by various civilizations, such as the Romans and the Greeks. While not as common as in previous centuries, modern militaries continue to employ dogs in an attack role. SOCOM forces of the US military still use dogs in raids for apprehending fleeing enemies or prisoners, or for searching areas too difficult or dangerous for human soldiers (such as crawl spaces).[32]




Sad use of dogs in war...




The Soviet Union used dogs for anti-tank purposes beginning in the 1930s. Earlier anti-tank dogs were fitted with tilt-rod mines and trained to run beneath enemy tanks, which would detonate the mines automatically. However, the dogs were trained with stationary Russian tanks and very seldom ran under the moving tanks, instead they were shot as they ran beside the moving tanks. When both Russian and German tanks were present, the dogs would preferentially run towards the familiar Russian tanks.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Nice, although I'm thinking something more... cinematic, perhaps? :)
    $endgroup$
    – Adrian Hall
    Mar 29 at 13:12






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @AdrianHall Check out the movie Rampage, just make the dog bigger. Also then erase that terrible movie from your memory
    $endgroup$
    – Trevor D
    Mar 29 at 13:12


















1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









13












$begingroup$

Your mad scientist is going to be very disappointed when he learns we already have a genetically engineered killer.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attack_dog




Early in recorded history there are records of dogs being trained for the purpose of attacking a target.[3] One of the most well-recorded ancient uses was in a battle between the Athenians and Corinthians, in which dogs were used to keep watch over a fortress and despite being unsuccessful in opposing an enemy attack, were able to alert the sleeping soldiers to the attack. Ancient Romans first adopted the use of dogs as a weapon after hordes of dogs delayed their victory in the Battle of Vercellae. The Romans not only trained them to attack, but also bred their attack dogs for ferocity. The effect of this was documented by Roman naturalist and writer Pliny the Elder, who wrote that the animals would not back down, even when confronted by swords. The Roman attack dogs were given metal armour covered in razor-sharp spikes, designed to force the enemy out of formation.[4]



Napoleon utilised dogs for their superior senses, putting them to work
in roles similar to that of modern sentry dogs.[5] The first use of
attack dogs in the United States of America was suggested by Benjamin
Franklin.[6] In South Africa under Apartheid, the South African
Defence Force used wolf-dog hybrids as experimental attack dogs to
combat guerillas.[7]



Various modern military groups also use attack dogs, primarily for
sentry purposes. The dogs are trained to defend their post and attack
any possible intruders.[12] It is also reported that dogs have been
used in psychological torture against prisoners of war.[13]



Additionally, attack dogs are used by almost every police force in the
world for apprehending and subduing targets (see police dog). The dogs
are trained to identify situations where humans are in danger and
respond accordingly.[14] Police attack dogs are generally trained to
hold a target rather than to inflict injury. Today attack or guard
dogs with military-level training may also be used outside the
military by individuals or families. These elite dogs may cost
hundreds of thousands of U.S. dollars.[15]




Dogs have been mans best friend for a long time. So long in fact that they are key to our own evolution and our dominance over the previous race. They are our greatest creation and we engineered them ourselves over 10's of thousands of years.



They are also very trainable, loyal, and deadly.



-Responding to your edit:



For more cinematic but without semi fake science. Your 10,000 is a small amount of money. It's barely enough to even get the car you need to go pick up your science stuff for your backyard. So your best bet is to go to a dog rescue place, get some really big dogs. Then buy some aluminum and forge armor for the dogs. It should take about a year to train them to attack on command or track their targets. You can fashion the armor similar to the historic dog armor. This should give you a bullet resistant (not proof) fast killer that looks cool and is within your budget... briefly, until you have to buy dog food and find places to get rid of the excrement.



-Edit
This is actually a better wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogs_in_warfare




In ancient times, dogs, often large mastiff- or molosser-type breeds, would be strapped with armor or spiked collars and sent into battle to attack the enemy. This strategy was used by various civilizations, such as the Romans and the Greeks. While not as common as in previous centuries, modern militaries continue to employ dogs in an attack role. SOCOM forces of the US military still use dogs in raids for apprehending fleeing enemies or prisoners, or for searching areas too difficult or dangerous for human soldiers (such as crawl spaces).[32]




Sad use of dogs in war...




The Soviet Union used dogs for anti-tank purposes beginning in the 1930s. Earlier anti-tank dogs were fitted with tilt-rod mines and trained to run beneath enemy tanks, which would detonate the mines automatically. However, the dogs were trained with stationary Russian tanks and very seldom ran under the moving tanks, instead they were shot as they ran beside the moving tanks. When both Russian and German tanks were present, the dogs would preferentially run towards the familiar Russian tanks.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Nice, although I'm thinking something more... cinematic, perhaps? :)
    $endgroup$
    – Adrian Hall
    Mar 29 at 13:12






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @AdrianHall Check out the movie Rampage, just make the dog bigger. Also then erase that terrible movie from your memory
    $endgroup$
    – Trevor D
    Mar 29 at 13:12
















13












$begingroup$

Your mad scientist is going to be very disappointed when he learns we already have a genetically engineered killer.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attack_dog




Early in recorded history there are records of dogs being trained for the purpose of attacking a target.[3] One of the most well-recorded ancient uses was in a battle between the Athenians and Corinthians, in which dogs were used to keep watch over a fortress and despite being unsuccessful in opposing an enemy attack, were able to alert the sleeping soldiers to the attack. Ancient Romans first adopted the use of dogs as a weapon after hordes of dogs delayed their victory in the Battle of Vercellae. The Romans not only trained them to attack, but also bred their attack dogs for ferocity. The effect of this was documented by Roman naturalist and writer Pliny the Elder, who wrote that the animals would not back down, even when confronted by swords. The Roman attack dogs were given metal armour covered in razor-sharp spikes, designed to force the enemy out of formation.[4]



Napoleon utilised dogs for their superior senses, putting them to work
in roles similar to that of modern sentry dogs.[5] The first use of
attack dogs in the United States of America was suggested by Benjamin
Franklin.[6] In South Africa under Apartheid, the South African
Defence Force used wolf-dog hybrids as experimental attack dogs to
combat guerillas.[7]



Various modern military groups also use attack dogs, primarily for
sentry purposes. The dogs are trained to defend their post and attack
any possible intruders.[12] It is also reported that dogs have been
used in psychological torture against prisoners of war.[13]



Additionally, attack dogs are used by almost every police force in the
world for apprehending and subduing targets (see police dog). The dogs
are trained to identify situations where humans are in danger and
respond accordingly.[14] Police attack dogs are generally trained to
hold a target rather than to inflict injury. Today attack or guard
dogs with military-level training may also be used outside the
military by individuals or families. These elite dogs may cost
hundreds of thousands of U.S. dollars.[15]




Dogs have been mans best friend for a long time. So long in fact that they are key to our own evolution and our dominance over the previous race. They are our greatest creation and we engineered them ourselves over 10's of thousands of years.



They are also very trainable, loyal, and deadly.



-Responding to your edit:



For more cinematic but without semi fake science. Your 10,000 is a small amount of money. It's barely enough to even get the car you need to go pick up your science stuff for your backyard. So your best bet is to go to a dog rescue place, get some really big dogs. Then buy some aluminum and forge armor for the dogs. It should take about a year to train them to attack on command or track their targets. You can fashion the armor similar to the historic dog armor. This should give you a bullet resistant (not proof) fast killer that looks cool and is within your budget... briefly, until you have to buy dog food and find places to get rid of the excrement.



-Edit
This is actually a better wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogs_in_warfare




In ancient times, dogs, often large mastiff- or molosser-type breeds, would be strapped with armor or spiked collars and sent into battle to attack the enemy. This strategy was used by various civilizations, such as the Romans and the Greeks. While not as common as in previous centuries, modern militaries continue to employ dogs in an attack role. SOCOM forces of the US military still use dogs in raids for apprehending fleeing enemies or prisoners, or for searching areas too difficult or dangerous for human soldiers (such as crawl spaces).[32]




Sad use of dogs in war...




The Soviet Union used dogs for anti-tank purposes beginning in the 1930s. Earlier anti-tank dogs were fitted with tilt-rod mines and trained to run beneath enemy tanks, which would detonate the mines automatically. However, the dogs were trained with stationary Russian tanks and very seldom ran under the moving tanks, instead they were shot as they ran beside the moving tanks. When both Russian and German tanks were present, the dogs would preferentially run towards the familiar Russian tanks.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Nice, although I'm thinking something more... cinematic, perhaps? :)
    $endgroup$
    – Adrian Hall
    Mar 29 at 13:12






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @AdrianHall Check out the movie Rampage, just make the dog bigger. Also then erase that terrible movie from your memory
    $endgroup$
    – Trevor D
    Mar 29 at 13:12














13












13








13





$begingroup$

Your mad scientist is going to be very disappointed when he learns we already have a genetically engineered killer.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attack_dog




Early in recorded history there are records of dogs being trained for the purpose of attacking a target.[3] One of the most well-recorded ancient uses was in a battle between the Athenians and Corinthians, in which dogs were used to keep watch over a fortress and despite being unsuccessful in opposing an enemy attack, were able to alert the sleeping soldiers to the attack. Ancient Romans first adopted the use of dogs as a weapon after hordes of dogs delayed their victory in the Battle of Vercellae. The Romans not only trained them to attack, but also bred their attack dogs for ferocity. The effect of this was documented by Roman naturalist and writer Pliny the Elder, who wrote that the animals would not back down, even when confronted by swords. The Roman attack dogs were given metal armour covered in razor-sharp spikes, designed to force the enemy out of formation.[4]



Napoleon utilised dogs for their superior senses, putting them to work
in roles similar to that of modern sentry dogs.[5] The first use of
attack dogs in the United States of America was suggested by Benjamin
Franklin.[6] In South Africa under Apartheid, the South African
Defence Force used wolf-dog hybrids as experimental attack dogs to
combat guerillas.[7]



Various modern military groups also use attack dogs, primarily for
sentry purposes. The dogs are trained to defend their post and attack
any possible intruders.[12] It is also reported that dogs have been
used in psychological torture against prisoners of war.[13]



Additionally, attack dogs are used by almost every police force in the
world for apprehending and subduing targets (see police dog). The dogs
are trained to identify situations where humans are in danger and
respond accordingly.[14] Police attack dogs are generally trained to
hold a target rather than to inflict injury. Today attack or guard
dogs with military-level training may also be used outside the
military by individuals or families. These elite dogs may cost
hundreds of thousands of U.S. dollars.[15]




Dogs have been mans best friend for a long time. So long in fact that they are key to our own evolution and our dominance over the previous race. They are our greatest creation and we engineered them ourselves over 10's of thousands of years.



They are also very trainable, loyal, and deadly.



-Responding to your edit:



For more cinematic but without semi fake science. Your 10,000 is a small amount of money. It's barely enough to even get the car you need to go pick up your science stuff for your backyard. So your best bet is to go to a dog rescue place, get some really big dogs. Then buy some aluminum and forge armor for the dogs. It should take about a year to train them to attack on command or track their targets. You can fashion the armor similar to the historic dog armor. This should give you a bullet resistant (not proof) fast killer that looks cool and is within your budget... briefly, until you have to buy dog food and find places to get rid of the excrement.



-Edit
This is actually a better wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogs_in_warfare




In ancient times, dogs, often large mastiff- or molosser-type breeds, would be strapped with armor or spiked collars and sent into battle to attack the enemy. This strategy was used by various civilizations, such as the Romans and the Greeks. While not as common as in previous centuries, modern militaries continue to employ dogs in an attack role. SOCOM forces of the US military still use dogs in raids for apprehending fleeing enemies or prisoners, or for searching areas too difficult or dangerous for human soldiers (such as crawl spaces).[32]




Sad use of dogs in war...




The Soviet Union used dogs for anti-tank purposes beginning in the 1930s. Earlier anti-tank dogs were fitted with tilt-rod mines and trained to run beneath enemy tanks, which would detonate the mines automatically. However, the dogs were trained with stationary Russian tanks and very seldom ran under the moving tanks, instead they were shot as they ran beside the moving tanks. When both Russian and German tanks were present, the dogs would preferentially run towards the familiar Russian tanks.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Your mad scientist is going to be very disappointed when he learns we already have a genetically engineered killer.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attack_dog




Early in recorded history there are records of dogs being trained for the purpose of attacking a target.[3] One of the most well-recorded ancient uses was in a battle between the Athenians and Corinthians, in which dogs were used to keep watch over a fortress and despite being unsuccessful in opposing an enemy attack, were able to alert the sleeping soldiers to the attack. Ancient Romans first adopted the use of dogs as a weapon after hordes of dogs delayed their victory in the Battle of Vercellae. The Romans not only trained them to attack, but also bred their attack dogs for ferocity. The effect of this was documented by Roman naturalist and writer Pliny the Elder, who wrote that the animals would not back down, even when confronted by swords. The Roman attack dogs were given metal armour covered in razor-sharp spikes, designed to force the enemy out of formation.[4]



Napoleon utilised dogs for their superior senses, putting them to work
in roles similar to that of modern sentry dogs.[5] The first use of
attack dogs in the United States of America was suggested by Benjamin
Franklin.[6] In South Africa under Apartheid, the South African
Defence Force used wolf-dog hybrids as experimental attack dogs to
combat guerillas.[7]



Various modern military groups also use attack dogs, primarily for
sentry purposes. The dogs are trained to defend their post and attack
any possible intruders.[12] It is also reported that dogs have been
used in psychological torture against prisoners of war.[13]



Additionally, attack dogs are used by almost every police force in the
world for apprehending and subduing targets (see police dog). The dogs
are trained to identify situations where humans are in danger and
respond accordingly.[14] Police attack dogs are generally trained to
hold a target rather than to inflict injury. Today attack or guard
dogs with military-level training may also be used outside the
military by individuals or families. These elite dogs may cost
hundreds of thousands of U.S. dollars.[15]




Dogs have been mans best friend for a long time. So long in fact that they are key to our own evolution and our dominance over the previous race. They are our greatest creation and we engineered them ourselves over 10's of thousands of years.



They are also very trainable, loyal, and deadly.



-Responding to your edit:



For more cinematic but without semi fake science. Your 10,000 is a small amount of money. It's barely enough to even get the car you need to go pick up your science stuff for your backyard. So your best bet is to go to a dog rescue place, get some really big dogs. Then buy some aluminum and forge armor for the dogs. It should take about a year to train them to attack on command or track their targets. You can fashion the armor similar to the historic dog armor. This should give you a bullet resistant (not proof) fast killer that looks cool and is within your budget... briefly, until you have to buy dog food and find places to get rid of the excrement.



-Edit
This is actually a better wiki
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogs_in_warfare




In ancient times, dogs, often large mastiff- or molosser-type breeds, would be strapped with armor or spiked collars and sent into battle to attack the enemy. This strategy was used by various civilizations, such as the Romans and the Greeks. While not as common as in previous centuries, modern militaries continue to employ dogs in an attack role. SOCOM forces of the US military still use dogs in raids for apprehending fleeing enemies or prisoners, or for searching areas too difficult or dangerous for human soldiers (such as crawl spaces).[32]




Sad use of dogs in war...




The Soviet Union used dogs for anti-tank purposes beginning in the 1930s. Earlier anti-tank dogs were fitted with tilt-rod mines and trained to run beneath enemy tanks, which would detonate the mines automatically. However, the dogs were trained with stationary Russian tanks and very seldom ran under the moving tanks, instead they were shot as they ran beside the moving tanks. When both Russian and German tanks were present, the dogs would preferentially run towards the familiar Russian tanks.








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 29 at 13:48

























answered Mar 29 at 13:10









Trevor DTrevor D

2,709319




2,709319











  • $begingroup$
    Nice, although I'm thinking something more... cinematic, perhaps? :)
    $endgroup$
    – Adrian Hall
    Mar 29 at 13:12






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @AdrianHall Check out the movie Rampage, just make the dog bigger. Also then erase that terrible movie from your memory
    $endgroup$
    – Trevor D
    Mar 29 at 13:12

















  • $begingroup$
    Nice, although I'm thinking something more... cinematic, perhaps? :)
    $endgroup$
    – Adrian Hall
    Mar 29 at 13:12






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @AdrianHall Check out the movie Rampage, just make the dog bigger. Also then erase that terrible movie from your memory
    $endgroup$
    – Trevor D
    Mar 29 at 13:12
















$begingroup$
Nice, although I'm thinking something more... cinematic, perhaps? :)
$endgroup$
– Adrian Hall
Mar 29 at 13:12




$begingroup$
Nice, although I'm thinking something more... cinematic, perhaps? :)
$endgroup$
– Adrian Hall
Mar 29 at 13:12




2




2




$begingroup$
@AdrianHall Check out the movie Rampage, just make the dog bigger. Also then erase that terrible movie from your memory
$endgroup$
– Trevor D
Mar 29 at 13:12





$begingroup$
@AdrianHall Check out the movie Rampage, just make the dog bigger. Also then erase that terrible movie from your memory
$endgroup$
– Trevor D
Mar 29 at 13:12




Popular posts from this blog

Adding axes to figuresAdding axes labels to LaTeX figuresLaTeX equivalent of ConTeXt buffersRotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?adding axes to shapesAlign axes across subfiguresAdding figures with a certain orderLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themAdding axes labels to LaTeX figures

Tähtien Talli Jäsenet | Lähteet | NavigointivalikkoSuomen Hippos – Tähtien Talli

Do these cracks on my tires look bad? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowDry rot tire should I replace?Having to replace tiresFishtailed so easily? Bad tires? ABS?Filling the tires with something other than air, to avoid puncture hassles?Used Michelin tires safe to install?Do these tyre cracks necessitate replacement?Rumbling noise: tires or mechanicalIs it possible to fix noisy feathered tires?Are bad winter tires still better than summer tires in winter?Torque converter failure - Related to replacing only 2 tires?Why use snow tires on all 4 wheels on 2-wheel-drive cars?