Would a high gravity rocky planet be guaranteed to have an atmosphere?Would oxygen pool in sink holes if the upper atmosphere was helium, hydrogen and methane?What are the requirements for an atmosphere retaining moon with a stable orbit arround an earth like planet with non-destructive tidal forces?What would happen to a high-pressure creature in a low-pressure atmosphere? (3atm)What would happen to a high-pressure creature in a low-pressure atmosphere (50atm)?How fast would a planet have to be spinning for the centrifugal/centripetal force to cancel out the force of gravity near the equator?Could a planet larger than earth with half the gravity have a denser atmosphere?What are the climatological effects to the surface of a planet where the atmosphere gives way to vaccum? (diagram included)5km artificial planet, with same gravity as on EarthCould a habitable planet with lower gravity have a thick atmosphere?How can this habitable planet have a moon with a naturally occurring atmosphere?
Example of a relative pronoun
N.B. ligature in Latex
Why Is Death Allowed In the Matrix?
How can I fix this gap between bookcases I made?
Why is "Reports" in sentence down without "The"
TGV timetables / schedules?
Pronouncing Dictionary.com's W.O.D "vade mecum" in English
Download, install and reboot computer at night if needed
Can I make popcorn with any corn?
Is Social Media Science Fiction?
"which" command doesn't work / path of Safari?
Can I interfere when another PC is about to be attacked?
How can the DM most effectively choose 1 out of an odd number of players to be targeted by an attack or effect?
Can Medicine checks be used, with decent rolls, to completely mitigate the risk of death from ongoing damage?
A newer friend of my brother's gave him a load of baseball cards that are supposedly extremely valuable. Is this a scam?
Banach space and Hilbert space topology
Why are 150k or 200k jobs considered good when there are 300k+ births a month?
How is this relation reflexive?
Can an x86 CPU running in real mode be considered to be basically an 8086 CPU?
What Brexit solution does the DUP want?
whey we use polarized capacitor?
I’m planning on buying a laser printer but concerned about the life cycle of toner in the machine
Copenhagen passport control - US citizen
What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?
Would a high gravity rocky planet be guaranteed to have an atmosphere?
Would oxygen pool in sink holes if the upper atmosphere was helium, hydrogen and methane?What are the requirements for an atmosphere retaining moon with a stable orbit arround an earth like planet with non-destructive tidal forces?What would happen to a high-pressure creature in a low-pressure atmosphere? (3atm)What would happen to a high-pressure creature in a low-pressure atmosphere (50atm)?How fast would a planet have to be spinning for the centrifugal/centripetal force to cancel out the force of gravity near the equator?Could a planet larger than earth with half the gravity have a denser atmosphere?What are the climatological effects to the surface of a planet where the atmosphere gives way to vaccum? (diagram included)5km artificial planet, with same gravity as on EarthCould a habitable planet with lower gravity have a thick atmosphere?How can this habitable planet have a moon with a naturally occurring atmosphere?
$begingroup$
I want to create a planet with a deep gravity well, say about 12G at the surface. At first I wanted the planet to have either no atmosphere or a very thin one. But I want this to be as close to realistic as possible. So, would a planet be guaranteed to have a thick atmosphere with a gravity well that deep?
reality-check planets gravity atmosphere
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I want to create a planet with a deep gravity well, say about 12G at the surface. At first I wanted the planet to have either no atmosphere or a very thin one. But I want this to be as close to realistic as possible. So, would a planet be guaranteed to have a thick atmosphere with a gravity well that deep?
reality-check planets gravity atmosphere
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Hi Sean, welcome to Worldbuilding.SE. You're asking two separate questions here. Could you please remove the second one (about escaping)? You are welcome to ask it in a new question, if it's not a duplicate. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– Cyn
Mar 27 at 22:08
1
$begingroup$
Easy : a planet which is so near it’s star that not only it’s atmosphere was blowed up but with it’s ground starting to melt.
$endgroup$
– user2284570
Mar 28 at 2:46
2
$begingroup$
Sean, one detail. 12G is incredibly high for a planet; it's unrealistic. Like, "4G" is huge.
$endgroup$
– Fattie
Mar 28 at 14:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I want to create a planet with a deep gravity well, say about 12G at the surface. At first I wanted the planet to have either no atmosphere or a very thin one. But I want this to be as close to realistic as possible. So, would a planet be guaranteed to have a thick atmosphere with a gravity well that deep?
reality-check planets gravity atmosphere
$endgroup$
I want to create a planet with a deep gravity well, say about 12G at the surface. At first I wanted the planet to have either no atmosphere or a very thin one. But I want this to be as close to realistic as possible. So, would a planet be guaranteed to have a thick atmosphere with a gravity well that deep?
reality-check planets gravity atmosphere
reality-check planets gravity atmosphere
edited Mar 27 at 22:36
Sean Kindle
asked Mar 27 at 21:23
Sean KindleSean Kindle
1088
1088
$begingroup$
Hi Sean, welcome to Worldbuilding.SE. You're asking two separate questions here. Could you please remove the second one (about escaping)? You are welcome to ask it in a new question, if it's not a duplicate. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– Cyn
Mar 27 at 22:08
1
$begingroup$
Easy : a planet which is so near it’s star that not only it’s atmosphere was blowed up but with it’s ground starting to melt.
$endgroup$
– user2284570
Mar 28 at 2:46
2
$begingroup$
Sean, one detail. 12G is incredibly high for a planet; it's unrealistic. Like, "4G" is huge.
$endgroup$
– Fattie
Mar 28 at 14:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hi Sean, welcome to Worldbuilding.SE. You're asking two separate questions here. Could you please remove the second one (about escaping)? You are welcome to ask it in a new question, if it's not a duplicate. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– Cyn
Mar 27 at 22:08
1
$begingroup$
Easy : a planet which is so near it’s star that not only it’s atmosphere was blowed up but with it’s ground starting to melt.
$endgroup$
– user2284570
Mar 28 at 2:46
2
$begingroup$
Sean, one detail. 12G is incredibly high for a planet; it's unrealistic. Like, "4G" is huge.
$endgroup$
– Fattie
Mar 28 at 14:36
$begingroup$
Hi Sean, welcome to Worldbuilding.SE. You're asking two separate questions here. Could you please remove the second one (about escaping)? You are welcome to ask it in a new question, if it's not a duplicate. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– Cyn
Mar 27 at 22:08
$begingroup$
Hi Sean, welcome to Worldbuilding.SE. You're asking two separate questions here. Could you please remove the second one (about escaping)? You are welcome to ask it in a new question, if it's not a duplicate. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– Cyn
Mar 27 at 22:08
1
1
$begingroup$
Easy : a planet which is so near it’s star that not only it’s atmosphere was blowed up but with it’s ground starting to melt.
$endgroup$
– user2284570
Mar 28 at 2:46
$begingroup$
Easy : a planet which is so near it’s star that not only it’s atmosphere was blowed up but with it’s ground starting to melt.
$endgroup$
– user2284570
Mar 28 at 2:46
2
2
$begingroup$
Sean, one detail. 12G is incredibly high for a planet; it's unrealistic. Like, "4G" is huge.
$endgroup$
– Fattie
Mar 28 at 14:36
$begingroup$
Sean, one detail. 12G is incredibly high for a planet; it's unrealistic. Like, "4G" is huge.
$endgroup$
– Fattie
Mar 28 at 14:36
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You ask a tricky question because the case you describe -- a rocky planet with 12G surface gravity -- is extremely unlikely. If the planet is defined as being rocky, then it's made of normal matter (not neutron star or white dwarf stuff) and to have 12G surface gravity, it would have to be quite large.
For a constant density sphere, the surface gravity increases proportional to the sphere's radius, so to have 12G surface gravity it would have to be around 12 times the diameter of the Earth. (The surface gravity is proportional to the planet's mass which is proportional to the cube of the radius. And surface gravity is also inversely proportional to the square of the radius (because the surface in further from the center and the inverse square law). The net effect is a proportionality to radius.)
Even rocks compress, so 12x is somewhat of an overestimate. Say it's "only" 10x the diameter of the Earth. It's still very difficult to see how a rocky planet 10x the diameter of Earth (meaning a mass of 1000 Earths -- greater than Jupiter!) could avoid picking up a huge atmosphere of gasses and being a typical Super Jupiter or even a small star.
About the only way I can think of is if the star it circles went through a very high luminosity phase and stripped away nearly all the atmosphere. (Since hot Jupiters are common, it seems unlikely that a planet that massive even one forming near a star could avoid a big atmosphere. It pretty much has to have had its atmosphere stripped later.) Not so clear that life would survive on it then.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
interesting. so to be more plausible it would have to be between 1-3G?
$endgroup$
– Sean Kindle
Mar 30 at 23:28
$begingroup$
This doesn't really affect the thrust of your point, but the planet doesn't have to have 12x the diameter of Earth if it is more dense. I think surface gravity would also vary proportionally to density. That being said, if we are talking about planets we've actually observed I don't think there is one even double the density of Earth.
$endgroup$
– ben
22 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Likely, but not guaranteed. Consider a large rocky planet very close to its star. There is certainly a possibility that the atmosphere would be boiled off / stripped away by the star.
This would be the case if, for instance, Mercury were orders of magnitude more massive. If your large rocky planet is close enough to its star to make this case true, you will have to deal with strange conditions for your character. One example is the planet is likely to be tidally locked, with an extremely hot side always facing the star and an extremely cold side always facing away from the star.
Whether humans have actually discovered a planet that meets these criteria is probably up for debate. Most inquiries into exoplanet atmospheres make the assumption that the existence or lack of atmosphere is unknown until the presence of an atmosphere is proven definitively.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think I see a scenario that could produce your world. Note that this is cataclysmic on an interstellar scale--life on nearby stars would have been eradicated.
We need a system that starts out with three stars, two of which are a close binary and each star exceeds (but not by too much) 8 solar masses. The third star is more distant and somewhat smaller.
The two big stars burn through their fuel and supernova, leaving behind neutron stars. The third is abused by these detonations but survives. The neutron stars are like their parents--a close binary. In time they spiral in and go splat--but enough mass is thrown off in the process to make your high-G world, from which a planet is born. (Note that I'm not sure it's possible for it to end up in a planet. The process is extremely energetic, it might be ejected too fast.)
Now you have a neutron star or black hole, a super-planet and an ordinary star. Now it's time for our third star to die--this time more peacefully, to a white dwarf.
This collection of debris encounters another star which ends up captured, the super-planet ending up in the life zone of the new star. The white dwarf sucks in matter from this fourth star, eventually you get a nova. This scours the atmosphere off the super-planet.
You're now left with a super-planet with no atmosphere. It's going to be an incredibly dense world as much of the stuff thrown off from the neutron star impact is from the lower part of the periodic table.
While you didn't ask for it this is going to be an immensely valuable source of heavy metals. (This is assuming it's worthwhile to ship such stuff. If you have a brute-force stardrive it probably isn't.)
Note that this is a very dangerous star system to be in, the white dwarf will periodically nova (although a sufficiently advanced science should be able to predict the detonations) and if it sucks down enough matter it will be even worse when it collapses down to a neutron star. You also have the jets from the other neutron star or black hole, although they could be aimed in a safe direction.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Heavy metal world.
- 12G planet. You could ramp up the gravity by making the core more dense. Our planet has an iron / nickel core under the rocks, and those have atomic weights of 55 and 58. Uranium has an atomic weight of 238. So if you made the core out of uranium and other heavy friends your density is 5x that of earth. Those elements are rarer than iron but not crazy rare. Now your planet only needs to be 2.4x as big as earth to have your 12G. If you want your planet even smaller, you can invoke the stable superheavy elements from the undiscovered far reaches of the periodic table - the island of stability
There could be other cool things about the uranium planet. Maybe natural fission goes on deep inside, which would make for rocking volcanoes. Could you take advantage of this to get off planet? Hmm... Also, the atmosphere would have a lot of radon, which would give everyone very low voices among other things.
- My understanding of atmosphere is that you need a magnetosphere to keep it in, gravity notwithstanding. Otherwise the solar wind will strip it away. Mars lost its magnetosphere and then lost its atmosphere because of that. No reason to think that the heavy planet would not have a magnetosphere.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Important to bear in mind that a planet whose core was composed of uranium would detonate. Furthermore, neither the uranium planet nor one composed of transuranic elements from the 'island of stability', can form in nature.
$endgroup$
– Arkenstein XII
Mar 27 at 23:25
2
$begingroup$
Only if it had significant U-235, Uranium-238 is really no danger.
$endgroup$
– user2617804
Mar 28 at 7:52
1
$begingroup$
While the core is important, don't forget to account for the amount of comparatively light elements in the mantle that are making up the actual bulk of Earth's mass and volume. - Swap out all the oxygen, silicon, and friends for stuff nearer lead, and the nickle and iron for something even heavier...
$endgroup$
– TheLuckless
Mar 28 at 16:24
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142617%2fwould-a-high-gravity-rocky-planet-be-guaranteed-to-have-an-atmosphere%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You ask a tricky question because the case you describe -- a rocky planet with 12G surface gravity -- is extremely unlikely. If the planet is defined as being rocky, then it's made of normal matter (not neutron star or white dwarf stuff) and to have 12G surface gravity, it would have to be quite large.
For a constant density sphere, the surface gravity increases proportional to the sphere's radius, so to have 12G surface gravity it would have to be around 12 times the diameter of the Earth. (The surface gravity is proportional to the planet's mass which is proportional to the cube of the radius. And surface gravity is also inversely proportional to the square of the radius (because the surface in further from the center and the inverse square law). The net effect is a proportionality to radius.)
Even rocks compress, so 12x is somewhat of an overestimate. Say it's "only" 10x the diameter of the Earth. It's still very difficult to see how a rocky planet 10x the diameter of Earth (meaning a mass of 1000 Earths -- greater than Jupiter!) could avoid picking up a huge atmosphere of gasses and being a typical Super Jupiter or even a small star.
About the only way I can think of is if the star it circles went through a very high luminosity phase and stripped away nearly all the atmosphere. (Since hot Jupiters are common, it seems unlikely that a planet that massive even one forming near a star could avoid a big atmosphere. It pretty much has to have had its atmosphere stripped later.) Not so clear that life would survive on it then.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
interesting. so to be more plausible it would have to be between 1-3G?
$endgroup$
– Sean Kindle
Mar 30 at 23:28
$begingroup$
This doesn't really affect the thrust of your point, but the planet doesn't have to have 12x the diameter of Earth if it is more dense. I think surface gravity would also vary proportionally to density. That being said, if we are talking about planets we've actually observed I don't think there is one even double the density of Earth.
$endgroup$
– ben
22 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You ask a tricky question because the case you describe -- a rocky planet with 12G surface gravity -- is extremely unlikely. If the planet is defined as being rocky, then it's made of normal matter (not neutron star or white dwarf stuff) and to have 12G surface gravity, it would have to be quite large.
For a constant density sphere, the surface gravity increases proportional to the sphere's radius, so to have 12G surface gravity it would have to be around 12 times the diameter of the Earth. (The surface gravity is proportional to the planet's mass which is proportional to the cube of the radius. And surface gravity is also inversely proportional to the square of the radius (because the surface in further from the center and the inverse square law). The net effect is a proportionality to radius.)
Even rocks compress, so 12x is somewhat of an overestimate. Say it's "only" 10x the diameter of the Earth. It's still very difficult to see how a rocky planet 10x the diameter of Earth (meaning a mass of 1000 Earths -- greater than Jupiter!) could avoid picking up a huge atmosphere of gasses and being a typical Super Jupiter or even a small star.
About the only way I can think of is if the star it circles went through a very high luminosity phase and stripped away nearly all the atmosphere. (Since hot Jupiters are common, it seems unlikely that a planet that massive even one forming near a star could avoid a big atmosphere. It pretty much has to have had its atmosphere stripped later.) Not so clear that life would survive on it then.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
interesting. so to be more plausible it would have to be between 1-3G?
$endgroup$
– Sean Kindle
Mar 30 at 23:28
$begingroup$
This doesn't really affect the thrust of your point, but the planet doesn't have to have 12x the diameter of Earth if it is more dense. I think surface gravity would also vary proportionally to density. That being said, if we are talking about planets we've actually observed I don't think there is one even double the density of Earth.
$endgroup$
– ben
22 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You ask a tricky question because the case you describe -- a rocky planet with 12G surface gravity -- is extremely unlikely. If the planet is defined as being rocky, then it's made of normal matter (not neutron star or white dwarf stuff) and to have 12G surface gravity, it would have to be quite large.
For a constant density sphere, the surface gravity increases proportional to the sphere's radius, so to have 12G surface gravity it would have to be around 12 times the diameter of the Earth. (The surface gravity is proportional to the planet's mass which is proportional to the cube of the radius. And surface gravity is also inversely proportional to the square of the radius (because the surface in further from the center and the inverse square law). The net effect is a proportionality to radius.)
Even rocks compress, so 12x is somewhat of an overestimate. Say it's "only" 10x the diameter of the Earth. It's still very difficult to see how a rocky planet 10x the diameter of Earth (meaning a mass of 1000 Earths -- greater than Jupiter!) could avoid picking up a huge atmosphere of gasses and being a typical Super Jupiter or even a small star.
About the only way I can think of is if the star it circles went through a very high luminosity phase and stripped away nearly all the atmosphere. (Since hot Jupiters are common, it seems unlikely that a planet that massive even one forming near a star could avoid a big atmosphere. It pretty much has to have had its atmosphere stripped later.) Not so clear that life would survive on it then.
$endgroup$
You ask a tricky question because the case you describe -- a rocky planet with 12G surface gravity -- is extremely unlikely. If the planet is defined as being rocky, then it's made of normal matter (not neutron star or white dwarf stuff) and to have 12G surface gravity, it would have to be quite large.
For a constant density sphere, the surface gravity increases proportional to the sphere's radius, so to have 12G surface gravity it would have to be around 12 times the diameter of the Earth. (The surface gravity is proportional to the planet's mass which is proportional to the cube of the radius. And surface gravity is also inversely proportional to the square of the radius (because the surface in further from the center and the inverse square law). The net effect is a proportionality to radius.)
Even rocks compress, so 12x is somewhat of an overestimate. Say it's "only" 10x the diameter of the Earth. It's still very difficult to see how a rocky planet 10x the diameter of Earth (meaning a mass of 1000 Earths -- greater than Jupiter!) could avoid picking up a huge atmosphere of gasses and being a typical Super Jupiter or even a small star.
About the only way I can think of is if the star it circles went through a very high luminosity phase and stripped away nearly all the atmosphere. (Since hot Jupiters are common, it seems unlikely that a planet that massive even one forming near a star could avoid a big atmosphere. It pretty much has to have had its atmosphere stripped later.) Not so clear that life would survive on it then.
answered Mar 27 at 21:56
Mark OlsonMark Olson
11.9k12949
11.9k12949
1
$begingroup$
interesting. so to be more plausible it would have to be between 1-3G?
$endgroup$
– Sean Kindle
Mar 30 at 23:28
$begingroup$
This doesn't really affect the thrust of your point, but the planet doesn't have to have 12x the diameter of Earth if it is more dense. I think surface gravity would also vary proportionally to density. That being said, if we are talking about planets we've actually observed I don't think there is one even double the density of Earth.
$endgroup$
– ben
22 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
interesting. so to be more plausible it would have to be between 1-3G?
$endgroup$
– Sean Kindle
Mar 30 at 23:28
$begingroup$
This doesn't really affect the thrust of your point, but the planet doesn't have to have 12x the diameter of Earth if it is more dense. I think surface gravity would also vary proportionally to density. That being said, if we are talking about planets we've actually observed I don't think there is one even double the density of Earth.
$endgroup$
– ben
22 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
interesting. so to be more plausible it would have to be between 1-3G?
$endgroup$
– Sean Kindle
Mar 30 at 23:28
$begingroup$
interesting. so to be more plausible it would have to be between 1-3G?
$endgroup$
– Sean Kindle
Mar 30 at 23:28
$begingroup$
This doesn't really affect the thrust of your point, but the planet doesn't have to have 12x the diameter of Earth if it is more dense. I think surface gravity would also vary proportionally to density. That being said, if we are talking about planets we've actually observed I don't think there is one even double the density of Earth.
$endgroup$
– ben
22 hours ago
$begingroup$
This doesn't really affect the thrust of your point, but the planet doesn't have to have 12x the diameter of Earth if it is more dense. I think surface gravity would also vary proportionally to density. That being said, if we are talking about planets we've actually observed I don't think there is one even double the density of Earth.
$endgroup$
– ben
22 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Likely, but not guaranteed. Consider a large rocky planet very close to its star. There is certainly a possibility that the atmosphere would be boiled off / stripped away by the star.
This would be the case if, for instance, Mercury were orders of magnitude more massive. If your large rocky planet is close enough to its star to make this case true, you will have to deal with strange conditions for your character. One example is the planet is likely to be tidally locked, with an extremely hot side always facing the star and an extremely cold side always facing away from the star.
Whether humans have actually discovered a planet that meets these criteria is probably up for debate. Most inquiries into exoplanet atmospheres make the assumption that the existence or lack of atmosphere is unknown until the presence of an atmosphere is proven definitively.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Likely, but not guaranteed. Consider a large rocky planet very close to its star. There is certainly a possibility that the atmosphere would be boiled off / stripped away by the star.
This would be the case if, for instance, Mercury were orders of magnitude more massive. If your large rocky planet is close enough to its star to make this case true, you will have to deal with strange conditions for your character. One example is the planet is likely to be tidally locked, with an extremely hot side always facing the star and an extremely cold side always facing away from the star.
Whether humans have actually discovered a planet that meets these criteria is probably up for debate. Most inquiries into exoplanet atmospheres make the assumption that the existence or lack of atmosphere is unknown until the presence of an atmosphere is proven definitively.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Likely, but not guaranteed. Consider a large rocky planet very close to its star. There is certainly a possibility that the atmosphere would be boiled off / stripped away by the star.
This would be the case if, for instance, Mercury were orders of magnitude more massive. If your large rocky planet is close enough to its star to make this case true, you will have to deal with strange conditions for your character. One example is the planet is likely to be tidally locked, with an extremely hot side always facing the star and an extremely cold side always facing away from the star.
Whether humans have actually discovered a planet that meets these criteria is probably up for debate. Most inquiries into exoplanet atmospheres make the assumption that the existence or lack of atmosphere is unknown until the presence of an atmosphere is proven definitively.
$endgroup$
Likely, but not guaranteed. Consider a large rocky planet very close to its star. There is certainly a possibility that the atmosphere would be boiled off / stripped away by the star.
This would be the case if, for instance, Mercury were orders of magnitude more massive. If your large rocky planet is close enough to its star to make this case true, you will have to deal with strange conditions for your character. One example is the planet is likely to be tidally locked, with an extremely hot side always facing the star and an extremely cold side always facing away from the star.
Whether humans have actually discovered a planet that meets these criteria is probably up for debate. Most inquiries into exoplanet atmospheres make the assumption that the existence or lack of atmosphere is unknown until the presence of an atmosphere is proven definitively.
answered Mar 27 at 21:36
benben
7867
7867
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think I see a scenario that could produce your world. Note that this is cataclysmic on an interstellar scale--life on nearby stars would have been eradicated.
We need a system that starts out with three stars, two of which are a close binary and each star exceeds (but not by too much) 8 solar masses. The third star is more distant and somewhat smaller.
The two big stars burn through their fuel and supernova, leaving behind neutron stars. The third is abused by these detonations but survives. The neutron stars are like their parents--a close binary. In time they spiral in and go splat--but enough mass is thrown off in the process to make your high-G world, from which a planet is born. (Note that I'm not sure it's possible for it to end up in a planet. The process is extremely energetic, it might be ejected too fast.)
Now you have a neutron star or black hole, a super-planet and an ordinary star. Now it's time for our third star to die--this time more peacefully, to a white dwarf.
This collection of debris encounters another star which ends up captured, the super-planet ending up in the life zone of the new star. The white dwarf sucks in matter from this fourth star, eventually you get a nova. This scours the atmosphere off the super-planet.
You're now left with a super-planet with no atmosphere. It's going to be an incredibly dense world as much of the stuff thrown off from the neutron star impact is from the lower part of the periodic table.
While you didn't ask for it this is going to be an immensely valuable source of heavy metals. (This is assuming it's worthwhile to ship such stuff. If you have a brute-force stardrive it probably isn't.)
Note that this is a very dangerous star system to be in, the white dwarf will periodically nova (although a sufficiently advanced science should be able to predict the detonations) and if it sucks down enough matter it will be even worse when it collapses down to a neutron star. You also have the jets from the other neutron star or black hole, although they could be aimed in a safe direction.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think I see a scenario that could produce your world. Note that this is cataclysmic on an interstellar scale--life on nearby stars would have been eradicated.
We need a system that starts out with three stars, two of which are a close binary and each star exceeds (but not by too much) 8 solar masses. The third star is more distant and somewhat smaller.
The two big stars burn through their fuel and supernova, leaving behind neutron stars. The third is abused by these detonations but survives. The neutron stars are like their parents--a close binary. In time they spiral in and go splat--but enough mass is thrown off in the process to make your high-G world, from which a planet is born. (Note that I'm not sure it's possible for it to end up in a planet. The process is extremely energetic, it might be ejected too fast.)
Now you have a neutron star or black hole, a super-planet and an ordinary star. Now it's time for our third star to die--this time more peacefully, to a white dwarf.
This collection of debris encounters another star which ends up captured, the super-planet ending up in the life zone of the new star. The white dwarf sucks in matter from this fourth star, eventually you get a nova. This scours the atmosphere off the super-planet.
You're now left with a super-planet with no atmosphere. It's going to be an incredibly dense world as much of the stuff thrown off from the neutron star impact is from the lower part of the periodic table.
While you didn't ask for it this is going to be an immensely valuable source of heavy metals. (This is assuming it's worthwhile to ship such stuff. If you have a brute-force stardrive it probably isn't.)
Note that this is a very dangerous star system to be in, the white dwarf will periodically nova (although a sufficiently advanced science should be able to predict the detonations) and if it sucks down enough matter it will be even worse when it collapses down to a neutron star. You also have the jets from the other neutron star or black hole, although they could be aimed in a safe direction.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think I see a scenario that could produce your world. Note that this is cataclysmic on an interstellar scale--life on nearby stars would have been eradicated.
We need a system that starts out with three stars, two of which are a close binary and each star exceeds (but not by too much) 8 solar masses. The third star is more distant and somewhat smaller.
The two big stars burn through their fuel and supernova, leaving behind neutron stars. The third is abused by these detonations but survives. The neutron stars are like their parents--a close binary. In time they spiral in and go splat--but enough mass is thrown off in the process to make your high-G world, from which a planet is born. (Note that I'm not sure it's possible for it to end up in a planet. The process is extremely energetic, it might be ejected too fast.)
Now you have a neutron star or black hole, a super-planet and an ordinary star. Now it's time for our third star to die--this time more peacefully, to a white dwarf.
This collection of debris encounters another star which ends up captured, the super-planet ending up in the life zone of the new star. The white dwarf sucks in matter from this fourth star, eventually you get a nova. This scours the atmosphere off the super-planet.
You're now left with a super-planet with no atmosphere. It's going to be an incredibly dense world as much of the stuff thrown off from the neutron star impact is from the lower part of the periodic table.
While you didn't ask for it this is going to be an immensely valuable source of heavy metals. (This is assuming it's worthwhile to ship such stuff. If you have a brute-force stardrive it probably isn't.)
Note that this is a very dangerous star system to be in, the white dwarf will periodically nova (although a sufficiently advanced science should be able to predict the detonations) and if it sucks down enough matter it will be even worse when it collapses down to a neutron star. You also have the jets from the other neutron star or black hole, although they could be aimed in a safe direction.
$endgroup$
I think I see a scenario that could produce your world. Note that this is cataclysmic on an interstellar scale--life on nearby stars would have been eradicated.
We need a system that starts out with three stars, two of which are a close binary and each star exceeds (but not by too much) 8 solar masses. The third star is more distant and somewhat smaller.
The two big stars burn through their fuel and supernova, leaving behind neutron stars. The third is abused by these detonations but survives. The neutron stars are like their parents--a close binary. In time they spiral in and go splat--but enough mass is thrown off in the process to make your high-G world, from which a planet is born. (Note that I'm not sure it's possible for it to end up in a planet. The process is extremely energetic, it might be ejected too fast.)
Now you have a neutron star or black hole, a super-planet and an ordinary star. Now it's time for our third star to die--this time more peacefully, to a white dwarf.
This collection of debris encounters another star which ends up captured, the super-planet ending up in the life zone of the new star. The white dwarf sucks in matter from this fourth star, eventually you get a nova. This scours the atmosphere off the super-planet.
You're now left with a super-planet with no atmosphere. It's going to be an incredibly dense world as much of the stuff thrown off from the neutron star impact is from the lower part of the periodic table.
While you didn't ask for it this is going to be an immensely valuable source of heavy metals. (This is assuming it's worthwhile to ship such stuff. If you have a brute-force stardrive it probably isn't.)
Note that this is a very dangerous star system to be in, the white dwarf will periodically nova (although a sufficiently advanced science should be able to predict the detonations) and if it sucks down enough matter it will be even worse when it collapses down to a neutron star. You also have the jets from the other neutron star or black hole, although they could be aimed in a safe direction.
answered Mar 28 at 0:48
Loren PechtelLoren Pechtel
19.9k2262
19.9k2262
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Heavy metal world.
- 12G planet. You could ramp up the gravity by making the core more dense. Our planet has an iron / nickel core under the rocks, and those have atomic weights of 55 and 58. Uranium has an atomic weight of 238. So if you made the core out of uranium and other heavy friends your density is 5x that of earth. Those elements are rarer than iron but not crazy rare. Now your planet only needs to be 2.4x as big as earth to have your 12G. If you want your planet even smaller, you can invoke the stable superheavy elements from the undiscovered far reaches of the periodic table - the island of stability
There could be other cool things about the uranium planet. Maybe natural fission goes on deep inside, which would make for rocking volcanoes. Could you take advantage of this to get off planet? Hmm... Also, the atmosphere would have a lot of radon, which would give everyone very low voices among other things.
- My understanding of atmosphere is that you need a magnetosphere to keep it in, gravity notwithstanding. Otherwise the solar wind will strip it away. Mars lost its magnetosphere and then lost its atmosphere because of that. No reason to think that the heavy planet would not have a magnetosphere.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Important to bear in mind that a planet whose core was composed of uranium would detonate. Furthermore, neither the uranium planet nor one composed of transuranic elements from the 'island of stability', can form in nature.
$endgroup$
– Arkenstein XII
Mar 27 at 23:25
2
$begingroup$
Only if it had significant U-235, Uranium-238 is really no danger.
$endgroup$
– user2617804
Mar 28 at 7:52
1
$begingroup$
While the core is important, don't forget to account for the amount of comparatively light elements in the mantle that are making up the actual bulk of Earth's mass and volume. - Swap out all the oxygen, silicon, and friends for stuff nearer lead, and the nickle and iron for something even heavier...
$endgroup$
– TheLuckless
Mar 28 at 16:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Heavy metal world.
- 12G planet. You could ramp up the gravity by making the core more dense. Our planet has an iron / nickel core under the rocks, and those have atomic weights of 55 and 58. Uranium has an atomic weight of 238. So if you made the core out of uranium and other heavy friends your density is 5x that of earth. Those elements are rarer than iron but not crazy rare. Now your planet only needs to be 2.4x as big as earth to have your 12G. If you want your planet even smaller, you can invoke the stable superheavy elements from the undiscovered far reaches of the periodic table - the island of stability
There could be other cool things about the uranium planet. Maybe natural fission goes on deep inside, which would make for rocking volcanoes. Could you take advantage of this to get off planet? Hmm... Also, the atmosphere would have a lot of radon, which would give everyone very low voices among other things.
- My understanding of atmosphere is that you need a magnetosphere to keep it in, gravity notwithstanding. Otherwise the solar wind will strip it away. Mars lost its magnetosphere and then lost its atmosphere because of that. No reason to think that the heavy planet would not have a magnetosphere.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Important to bear in mind that a planet whose core was composed of uranium would detonate. Furthermore, neither the uranium planet nor one composed of transuranic elements from the 'island of stability', can form in nature.
$endgroup$
– Arkenstein XII
Mar 27 at 23:25
2
$begingroup$
Only if it had significant U-235, Uranium-238 is really no danger.
$endgroup$
– user2617804
Mar 28 at 7:52
1
$begingroup$
While the core is important, don't forget to account for the amount of comparatively light elements in the mantle that are making up the actual bulk of Earth's mass and volume. - Swap out all the oxygen, silicon, and friends for stuff nearer lead, and the nickle and iron for something even heavier...
$endgroup$
– TheLuckless
Mar 28 at 16:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Heavy metal world.
- 12G planet. You could ramp up the gravity by making the core more dense. Our planet has an iron / nickel core under the rocks, and those have atomic weights of 55 and 58. Uranium has an atomic weight of 238. So if you made the core out of uranium and other heavy friends your density is 5x that of earth. Those elements are rarer than iron but not crazy rare. Now your planet only needs to be 2.4x as big as earth to have your 12G. If you want your planet even smaller, you can invoke the stable superheavy elements from the undiscovered far reaches of the periodic table - the island of stability
There could be other cool things about the uranium planet. Maybe natural fission goes on deep inside, which would make for rocking volcanoes. Could you take advantage of this to get off planet? Hmm... Also, the atmosphere would have a lot of radon, which would give everyone very low voices among other things.
- My understanding of atmosphere is that you need a magnetosphere to keep it in, gravity notwithstanding. Otherwise the solar wind will strip it away. Mars lost its magnetosphere and then lost its atmosphere because of that. No reason to think that the heavy planet would not have a magnetosphere.
$endgroup$
Heavy metal world.
- 12G planet. You could ramp up the gravity by making the core more dense. Our planet has an iron / nickel core under the rocks, and those have atomic weights of 55 and 58. Uranium has an atomic weight of 238. So if you made the core out of uranium and other heavy friends your density is 5x that of earth. Those elements are rarer than iron but not crazy rare. Now your planet only needs to be 2.4x as big as earth to have your 12G. If you want your planet even smaller, you can invoke the stable superheavy elements from the undiscovered far reaches of the periodic table - the island of stability
There could be other cool things about the uranium planet. Maybe natural fission goes on deep inside, which would make for rocking volcanoes. Could you take advantage of this to get off planet? Hmm... Also, the atmosphere would have a lot of radon, which would give everyone very low voices among other things.
- My understanding of atmosphere is that you need a magnetosphere to keep it in, gravity notwithstanding. Otherwise the solar wind will strip it away. Mars lost its magnetosphere and then lost its atmosphere because of that. No reason to think that the heavy planet would not have a magnetosphere.
answered Mar 27 at 22:42
WillkWillk
116k27219487
116k27219487
2
$begingroup$
Important to bear in mind that a planet whose core was composed of uranium would detonate. Furthermore, neither the uranium planet nor one composed of transuranic elements from the 'island of stability', can form in nature.
$endgroup$
– Arkenstein XII
Mar 27 at 23:25
2
$begingroup$
Only if it had significant U-235, Uranium-238 is really no danger.
$endgroup$
– user2617804
Mar 28 at 7:52
1
$begingroup$
While the core is important, don't forget to account for the amount of comparatively light elements in the mantle that are making up the actual bulk of Earth's mass and volume. - Swap out all the oxygen, silicon, and friends for stuff nearer lead, and the nickle and iron for something even heavier...
$endgroup$
– TheLuckless
Mar 28 at 16:24
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
Important to bear in mind that a planet whose core was composed of uranium would detonate. Furthermore, neither the uranium planet nor one composed of transuranic elements from the 'island of stability', can form in nature.
$endgroup$
– Arkenstein XII
Mar 27 at 23:25
2
$begingroup$
Only if it had significant U-235, Uranium-238 is really no danger.
$endgroup$
– user2617804
Mar 28 at 7:52
1
$begingroup$
While the core is important, don't forget to account for the amount of comparatively light elements in the mantle that are making up the actual bulk of Earth's mass and volume. - Swap out all the oxygen, silicon, and friends for stuff nearer lead, and the nickle and iron for something even heavier...
$endgroup$
– TheLuckless
Mar 28 at 16:24
2
2
$begingroup$
Important to bear in mind that a planet whose core was composed of uranium would detonate. Furthermore, neither the uranium planet nor one composed of transuranic elements from the 'island of stability', can form in nature.
$endgroup$
– Arkenstein XII
Mar 27 at 23:25
$begingroup$
Important to bear in mind that a planet whose core was composed of uranium would detonate. Furthermore, neither the uranium planet nor one composed of transuranic elements from the 'island of stability', can form in nature.
$endgroup$
– Arkenstein XII
Mar 27 at 23:25
2
2
$begingroup$
Only if it had significant U-235, Uranium-238 is really no danger.
$endgroup$
– user2617804
Mar 28 at 7:52
$begingroup$
Only if it had significant U-235, Uranium-238 is really no danger.
$endgroup$
– user2617804
Mar 28 at 7:52
1
1
$begingroup$
While the core is important, don't forget to account for the amount of comparatively light elements in the mantle that are making up the actual bulk of Earth's mass and volume. - Swap out all the oxygen, silicon, and friends for stuff nearer lead, and the nickle and iron for something even heavier...
$endgroup$
– TheLuckless
Mar 28 at 16:24
$begingroup$
While the core is important, don't forget to account for the amount of comparatively light elements in the mantle that are making up the actual bulk of Earth's mass and volume. - Swap out all the oxygen, silicon, and friends for stuff nearer lead, and the nickle and iron for something even heavier...
$endgroup$
– TheLuckless
Mar 28 at 16:24
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142617%2fwould-a-high-gravity-rocky-planet-be-guaranteed-to-have-an-atmosphere%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Hi Sean, welcome to Worldbuilding.SE. You're asking two separate questions here. Could you please remove the second one (about escaping)? You are welcome to ask it in a new question, if it's not a duplicate. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– Cyn
Mar 27 at 22:08
1
$begingroup$
Easy : a planet which is so near it’s star that not only it’s atmosphere was blowed up but with it’s ground starting to melt.
$endgroup$
– user2284570
Mar 28 at 2:46
2
$begingroup$
Sean, one detail. 12G is incredibly high for a planet; it's unrealistic. Like, "4G" is huge.
$endgroup$
– Fattie
Mar 28 at 14:36