Would a high gravity rocky planet be guaranteed to have an atmosphere?Would oxygen pool in sink holes if the upper atmosphere was helium, hydrogen and methane?What are the requirements for an atmosphere retaining moon with a stable orbit arround an earth like planet with non-destructive tidal forces?What would happen to a high-pressure creature in a low-pressure atmosphere? (3atm)What would happen to a high-pressure creature in a low-pressure atmosphere (50atm)?How fast would a planet have to be spinning for the centrifugal/centripetal force to cancel out the force of gravity near the equator?Could a planet larger than earth with half the gravity have a denser atmosphere?What are the climatological effects to the surface of a planet where the atmosphere gives way to vaccum? (diagram included)5km artificial planet, with same gravity as on EarthCould a habitable planet with lower gravity have a thick atmosphere?How can this habitable planet have a moon with a naturally occurring atmosphere?

Example of a relative pronoun

N.B. ligature in Latex

Why Is Death Allowed In the Matrix?

How can I fix this gap between bookcases I made?

Why is "Reports" in sentence down without "The"

TGV timetables / schedules?

Pronouncing Dictionary.com's W.O.D "vade mecum" in English

Download, install and reboot computer at night if needed

Can I make popcorn with any corn?

Is Social Media Science Fiction?

"which" command doesn't work / path of Safari?

Can I interfere when another PC is about to be attacked?

How can the DM most effectively choose 1 out of an odd number of players to be targeted by an attack or effect?

Can Medicine checks be used, with decent rolls, to completely mitigate the risk of death from ongoing damage?

A newer friend of my brother's gave him a load of baseball cards that are supposedly extremely valuable. Is this a scam?

Banach space and Hilbert space topology

Why are 150k or 200k jobs considered good when there are 300k+ births a month?

How is this relation reflexive?

Can an x86 CPU running in real mode be considered to be basically an 8086 CPU?

What Brexit solution does the DUP want?

whey we use polarized capacitor?

I’m planning on buying a laser printer but concerned about the life cycle of toner in the machine

Copenhagen passport control - US citizen

What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?



Would a high gravity rocky planet be guaranteed to have an atmosphere?


Would oxygen pool in sink holes if the upper atmosphere was helium, hydrogen and methane?What are the requirements for an atmosphere retaining moon with a stable orbit arround an earth like planet with non-destructive tidal forces?What would happen to a high-pressure creature in a low-pressure atmosphere? (3atm)What would happen to a high-pressure creature in a low-pressure atmosphere (50atm)?How fast would a planet have to be spinning for the centrifugal/centripetal force to cancel out the force of gravity near the equator?Could a planet larger than earth with half the gravity have a denser atmosphere?What are the climatological effects to the surface of a planet where the atmosphere gives way to vaccum? (diagram included)5km artificial planet, with same gravity as on EarthCould a habitable planet with lower gravity have a thick atmosphere?How can this habitable planet have a moon with a naturally occurring atmosphere?













14












$begingroup$


I want to create a planet with a deep gravity well, say about 12G at the surface. At first I wanted the planet to have either no atmosphere or a very thin one. But I want this to be as close to realistic as possible. So, would a planet be guaranteed to have a thick atmosphere with a gravity well that deep?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Hi Sean, welcome to Worldbuilding.SE. You're asking two separate questions here. Could you please remove the second one (about escaping)? You are welcome to ask it in a new question, if it's not a duplicate. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    Mar 27 at 22:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Easy : a planet which is so near it’s star that not only it’s atmosphere was blowed up but with it’s ground starting to melt.
    $endgroup$
    – user2284570
    Mar 28 at 2:46







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Sean, one detail. 12G is incredibly high for a planet; it's unrealistic. Like, "4G" is huge.
    $endgroup$
    – Fattie
    Mar 28 at 14:36















14












$begingroup$


I want to create a planet with a deep gravity well, say about 12G at the surface. At first I wanted the planet to have either no atmosphere or a very thin one. But I want this to be as close to realistic as possible. So, would a planet be guaranteed to have a thick atmosphere with a gravity well that deep?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Hi Sean, welcome to Worldbuilding.SE. You're asking two separate questions here. Could you please remove the second one (about escaping)? You are welcome to ask it in a new question, if it's not a duplicate. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    Mar 27 at 22:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Easy : a planet which is so near it’s star that not only it’s atmosphere was blowed up but with it’s ground starting to melt.
    $endgroup$
    – user2284570
    Mar 28 at 2:46







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Sean, one detail. 12G is incredibly high for a planet; it's unrealistic. Like, "4G" is huge.
    $endgroup$
    – Fattie
    Mar 28 at 14:36













14












14








14





$begingroup$


I want to create a planet with a deep gravity well, say about 12G at the surface. At first I wanted the planet to have either no atmosphere or a very thin one. But I want this to be as close to realistic as possible. So, would a planet be guaranteed to have a thick atmosphere with a gravity well that deep?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I want to create a planet with a deep gravity well, say about 12G at the surface. At first I wanted the planet to have either no atmosphere or a very thin one. But I want this to be as close to realistic as possible. So, would a planet be guaranteed to have a thick atmosphere with a gravity well that deep?







reality-check planets gravity atmosphere






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 27 at 22:36







Sean Kindle

















asked Mar 27 at 21:23









Sean KindleSean Kindle

1088




1088











  • $begingroup$
    Hi Sean, welcome to Worldbuilding.SE. You're asking two separate questions here. Could you please remove the second one (about escaping)? You are welcome to ask it in a new question, if it's not a duplicate. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    Mar 27 at 22:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Easy : a planet which is so near it’s star that not only it’s atmosphere was blowed up but with it’s ground starting to melt.
    $endgroup$
    – user2284570
    Mar 28 at 2:46







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Sean, one detail. 12G is incredibly high for a planet; it's unrealistic. Like, "4G" is huge.
    $endgroup$
    – Fattie
    Mar 28 at 14:36
















  • $begingroup$
    Hi Sean, welcome to Worldbuilding.SE. You're asking two separate questions here. Could you please remove the second one (about escaping)? You are welcome to ask it in a new question, if it's not a duplicate. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    Mar 27 at 22:08






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Easy : a planet which is so near it’s star that not only it’s atmosphere was blowed up but with it’s ground starting to melt.
    $endgroup$
    – user2284570
    Mar 28 at 2:46







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Sean, one detail. 12G is incredibly high for a planet; it's unrealistic. Like, "4G" is huge.
    $endgroup$
    – Fattie
    Mar 28 at 14:36















$begingroup$
Hi Sean, welcome to Worldbuilding.SE. You're asking two separate questions here. Could you please remove the second one (about escaping)? You are welcome to ask it in a new question, if it's not a duplicate. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– Cyn
Mar 27 at 22:08




$begingroup$
Hi Sean, welcome to Worldbuilding.SE. You're asking two separate questions here. Could you please remove the second one (about escaping)? You are welcome to ask it in a new question, if it's not a duplicate. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– Cyn
Mar 27 at 22:08




1




1




$begingroup$
Easy : a planet which is so near it’s star that not only it’s atmosphere was blowed up but with it’s ground starting to melt.
$endgroup$
– user2284570
Mar 28 at 2:46





$begingroup$
Easy : a planet which is so near it’s star that not only it’s atmosphere was blowed up but with it’s ground starting to melt.
$endgroup$
– user2284570
Mar 28 at 2:46





2




2




$begingroup$
Sean, one detail. 12G is incredibly high for a planet; it's unrealistic. Like, "4G" is huge.
$endgroup$
– Fattie
Mar 28 at 14:36




$begingroup$
Sean, one detail. 12G is incredibly high for a planet; it's unrealistic. Like, "4G" is huge.
$endgroup$
– Fattie
Mar 28 at 14:36










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















20












$begingroup$

You ask a tricky question because the case you describe -- a rocky planet with 12G surface gravity -- is extremely unlikely. If the planet is defined as being rocky, then it's made of normal matter (not neutron star or white dwarf stuff) and to have 12G surface gravity, it would have to be quite large.



For a constant density sphere, the surface gravity increases proportional to the sphere's radius, so to have 12G surface gravity it would have to be around 12 times the diameter of the Earth. (The surface gravity is proportional to the planet's mass which is proportional to the cube of the radius. And surface gravity is also inversely proportional to the square of the radius (because the surface in further from the center and the inverse square law). The net effect is a proportionality to radius.)



Even rocks compress, so 12x is somewhat of an overestimate. Say it's "only" 10x the diameter of the Earth. It's still very difficult to see how a rocky planet 10x the diameter of Earth (meaning a mass of 1000 Earths -- greater than Jupiter!) could avoid picking up a huge atmosphere of gasses and being a typical Super Jupiter or even a small star.



About the only way I can think of is if the star it circles went through a very high luminosity phase and stripped away nearly all the atmosphere. (Since hot Jupiters are common, it seems unlikely that a planet that massive even one forming near a star could avoid a big atmosphere. It pretty much has to have had its atmosphere stripped later.) Not so clear that life would survive on it then.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    interesting. so to be more plausible it would have to be between 1-3G?
    $endgroup$
    – Sean Kindle
    Mar 30 at 23:28










  • $begingroup$
    This doesn't really affect the thrust of your point, but the planet doesn't have to have 12x the diameter of Earth if it is more dense. I think surface gravity would also vary proportionally to density. That being said, if we are talking about planets we've actually observed I don't think there is one even double the density of Earth.
    $endgroup$
    – ben
    22 hours ago


















7












$begingroup$

Likely, but not guaranteed. Consider a large rocky planet very close to its star. There is certainly a possibility that the atmosphere would be boiled off / stripped away by the star.



This would be the case if, for instance, Mercury were orders of magnitude more massive. If your large rocky planet is close enough to its star to make this case true, you will have to deal with strange conditions for your character. One example is the planet is likely to be tidally locked, with an extremely hot side always facing the star and an extremely cold side always facing away from the star.



Whether humans have actually discovered a planet that meets these criteria is probably up for debate. Most inquiries into exoplanet atmospheres make the assumption that the existence or lack of atmosphere is unknown until the presence of an atmosphere is proven definitively.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    6












    $begingroup$

    I think I see a scenario that could produce your world. Note that this is cataclysmic on an interstellar scale--life on nearby stars would have been eradicated.



    We need a system that starts out with three stars, two of which are a close binary and each star exceeds (but not by too much) 8 solar masses. The third star is more distant and somewhat smaller.



    The two big stars burn through their fuel and supernova, leaving behind neutron stars. The third is abused by these detonations but survives. The neutron stars are like their parents--a close binary. In time they spiral in and go splat--but enough mass is thrown off in the process to make your high-G world, from which a planet is born. (Note that I'm not sure it's possible for it to end up in a planet. The process is extremely energetic, it might be ejected too fast.)



    Now you have a neutron star or black hole, a super-planet and an ordinary star. Now it's time for our third star to die--this time more peacefully, to a white dwarf.



    This collection of debris encounters another star which ends up captured, the super-planet ending up in the life zone of the new star. The white dwarf sucks in matter from this fourth star, eventually you get a nova. This scours the atmosphere off the super-planet.



    You're now left with a super-planet with no atmosphere. It's going to be an incredibly dense world as much of the stuff thrown off from the neutron star impact is from the lower part of the periodic table.



    While you didn't ask for it this is going to be an immensely valuable source of heavy metals. (This is assuming it's worthwhile to ship such stuff. If you have a brute-force stardrive it probably isn't.)



    Note that this is a very dangerous star system to be in, the white dwarf will periodically nova (although a sufficiently advanced science should be able to predict the detonations) and if it sucks down enough matter it will be even worse when it collapses down to a neutron star. You also have the jets from the other neutron star or black hole, although they could be aimed in a safe direction.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      3












      $begingroup$

      Heavy metal world.



      1. 12G planet. You could ramp up the gravity by making the core more dense. Our planet has an iron / nickel core under the rocks, and those have atomic weights of 55 and 58. Uranium has an atomic weight of 238. So if you made the core out of uranium and other heavy friends your density is 5x that of earth. Those elements are rarer than iron but not crazy rare. Now your planet only needs to be 2.4x as big as earth to have your 12G. If you want your planet even smaller, you can invoke the stable superheavy elements from the undiscovered far reaches of the periodic table - the island of stability

      There could be other cool things about the uranium planet. Maybe natural fission goes on deep inside, which would make for rocking volcanoes. Could you take advantage of this to get off planet? Hmm... Also, the atmosphere would have a lot of radon, which would give everyone very low voices among other things.



      1. My understanding of atmosphere is that you need a magnetosphere to keep it in, gravity notwithstanding. Otherwise the solar wind will strip it away. Mars lost its magnetosphere and then lost its atmosphere because of that. No reason to think that the heavy planet would not have a magnetosphere.





      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$








      • 2




        $begingroup$
        Important to bear in mind that a planet whose core was composed of uranium would detonate. Furthermore, neither the uranium planet nor one composed of transuranic elements from the 'island of stability', can form in nature.
        $endgroup$
        – Arkenstein XII
        Mar 27 at 23:25






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        Only if it had significant U-235, Uranium-238 is really no danger.
        $endgroup$
        – user2617804
        Mar 28 at 7:52






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        While the core is important, don't forget to account for the amount of comparatively light elements in the mantle that are making up the actual bulk of Earth's mass and volume. - Swap out all the oxygen, silicon, and friends for stuff nearer lead, and the nickle and iron for something even heavier...
        $endgroup$
        – TheLuckless
        Mar 28 at 16:24











      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "579"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142617%2fwould-a-high-gravity-rocky-planet-be-guaranteed-to-have-an-atmosphere%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      20












      $begingroup$

      You ask a tricky question because the case you describe -- a rocky planet with 12G surface gravity -- is extremely unlikely. If the planet is defined as being rocky, then it's made of normal matter (not neutron star or white dwarf stuff) and to have 12G surface gravity, it would have to be quite large.



      For a constant density sphere, the surface gravity increases proportional to the sphere's radius, so to have 12G surface gravity it would have to be around 12 times the diameter of the Earth. (The surface gravity is proportional to the planet's mass which is proportional to the cube of the radius. And surface gravity is also inversely proportional to the square of the radius (because the surface in further from the center and the inverse square law). The net effect is a proportionality to radius.)



      Even rocks compress, so 12x is somewhat of an overestimate. Say it's "only" 10x the diameter of the Earth. It's still very difficult to see how a rocky planet 10x the diameter of Earth (meaning a mass of 1000 Earths -- greater than Jupiter!) could avoid picking up a huge atmosphere of gasses and being a typical Super Jupiter or even a small star.



      About the only way I can think of is if the star it circles went through a very high luminosity phase and stripped away nearly all the atmosphere. (Since hot Jupiters are common, it seems unlikely that a planet that massive even one forming near a star could avoid a big atmosphere. It pretty much has to have had its atmosphere stripped later.) Not so clear that life would survive on it then.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$








      • 1




        $begingroup$
        interesting. so to be more plausible it would have to be between 1-3G?
        $endgroup$
        – Sean Kindle
        Mar 30 at 23:28










      • $begingroup$
        This doesn't really affect the thrust of your point, but the planet doesn't have to have 12x the diameter of Earth if it is more dense. I think surface gravity would also vary proportionally to density. That being said, if we are talking about planets we've actually observed I don't think there is one even double the density of Earth.
        $endgroup$
        – ben
        22 hours ago















      20












      $begingroup$

      You ask a tricky question because the case you describe -- a rocky planet with 12G surface gravity -- is extremely unlikely. If the planet is defined as being rocky, then it's made of normal matter (not neutron star or white dwarf stuff) and to have 12G surface gravity, it would have to be quite large.



      For a constant density sphere, the surface gravity increases proportional to the sphere's radius, so to have 12G surface gravity it would have to be around 12 times the diameter of the Earth. (The surface gravity is proportional to the planet's mass which is proportional to the cube of the radius. And surface gravity is also inversely proportional to the square of the radius (because the surface in further from the center and the inverse square law). The net effect is a proportionality to radius.)



      Even rocks compress, so 12x is somewhat of an overestimate. Say it's "only" 10x the diameter of the Earth. It's still very difficult to see how a rocky planet 10x the diameter of Earth (meaning a mass of 1000 Earths -- greater than Jupiter!) could avoid picking up a huge atmosphere of gasses and being a typical Super Jupiter or even a small star.



      About the only way I can think of is if the star it circles went through a very high luminosity phase and stripped away nearly all the atmosphere. (Since hot Jupiters are common, it seems unlikely that a planet that massive even one forming near a star could avoid a big atmosphere. It pretty much has to have had its atmosphere stripped later.) Not so clear that life would survive on it then.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$








      • 1




        $begingroup$
        interesting. so to be more plausible it would have to be between 1-3G?
        $endgroup$
        – Sean Kindle
        Mar 30 at 23:28










      • $begingroup$
        This doesn't really affect the thrust of your point, but the planet doesn't have to have 12x the diameter of Earth if it is more dense. I think surface gravity would also vary proportionally to density. That being said, if we are talking about planets we've actually observed I don't think there is one even double the density of Earth.
        $endgroup$
        – ben
        22 hours ago













      20












      20








      20





      $begingroup$

      You ask a tricky question because the case you describe -- a rocky planet with 12G surface gravity -- is extremely unlikely. If the planet is defined as being rocky, then it's made of normal matter (not neutron star or white dwarf stuff) and to have 12G surface gravity, it would have to be quite large.



      For a constant density sphere, the surface gravity increases proportional to the sphere's radius, so to have 12G surface gravity it would have to be around 12 times the diameter of the Earth. (The surface gravity is proportional to the planet's mass which is proportional to the cube of the radius. And surface gravity is also inversely proportional to the square of the radius (because the surface in further from the center and the inverse square law). The net effect is a proportionality to radius.)



      Even rocks compress, so 12x is somewhat of an overestimate. Say it's "only" 10x the diameter of the Earth. It's still very difficult to see how a rocky planet 10x the diameter of Earth (meaning a mass of 1000 Earths -- greater than Jupiter!) could avoid picking up a huge atmosphere of gasses and being a typical Super Jupiter or even a small star.



      About the only way I can think of is if the star it circles went through a very high luminosity phase and stripped away nearly all the atmosphere. (Since hot Jupiters are common, it seems unlikely that a planet that massive even one forming near a star could avoid a big atmosphere. It pretty much has to have had its atmosphere stripped later.) Not so clear that life would survive on it then.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



      You ask a tricky question because the case you describe -- a rocky planet with 12G surface gravity -- is extremely unlikely. If the planet is defined as being rocky, then it's made of normal matter (not neutron star or white dwarf stuff) and to have 12G surface gravity, it would have to be quite large.



      For a constant density sphere, the surface gravity increases proportional to the sphere's radius, so to have 12G surface gravity it would have to be around 12 times the diameter of the Earth. (The surface gravity is proportional to the planet's mass which is proportional to the cube of the radius. And surface gravity is also inversely proportional to the square of the radius (because the surface in further from the center and the inverse square law). The net effect is a proportionality to radius.)



      Even rocks compress, so 12x is somewhat of an overestimate. Say it's "only" 10x the diameter of the Earth. It's still very difficult to see how a rocky planet 10x the diameter of Earth (meaning a mass of 1000 Earths -- greater than Jupiter!) could avoid picking up a huge atmosphere of gasses and being a typical Super Jupiter or even a small star.



      About the only way I can think of is if the star it circles went through a very high luminosity phase and stripped away nearly all the atmosphere. (Since hot Jupiters are common, it seems unlikely that a planet that massive even one forming near a star could avoid a big atmosphere. It pretty much has to have had its atmosphere stripped later.) Not so clear that life would survive on it then.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Mar 27 at 21:56









      Mark OlsonMark Olson

      11.9k12949




      11.9k12949







      • 1




        $begingroup$
        interesting. so to be more plausible it would have to be between 1-3G?
        $endgroup$
        – Sean Kindle
        Mar 30 at 23:28










      • $begingroup$
        This doesn't really affect the thrust of your point, but the planet doesn't have to have 12x the diameter of Earth if it is more dense. I think surface gravity would also vary proportionally to density. That being said, if we are talking about planets we've actually observed I don't think there is one even double the density of Earth.
        $endgroup$
        – ben
        22 hours ago












      • 1




        $begingroup$
        interesting. so to be more plausible it would have to be between 1-3G?
        $endgroup$
        – Sean Kindle
        Mar 30 at 23:28










      • $begingroup$
        This doesn't really affect the thrust of your point, but the planet doesn't have to have 12x the diameter of Earth if it is more dense. I think surface gravity would also vary proportionally to density. That being said, if we are talking about planets we've actually observed I don't think there is one even double the density of Earth.
        $endgroup$
        – ben
        22 hours ago







      1




      1




      $begingroup$
      interesting. so to be more plausible it would have to be between 1-3G?
      $endgroup$
      – Sean Kindle
      Mar 30 at 23:28




      $begingroup$
      interesting. so to be more plausible it would have to be between 1-3G?
      $endgroup$
      – Sean Kindle
      Mar 30 at 23:28












      $begingroup$
      This doesn't really affect the thrust of your point, but the planet doesn't have to have 12x the diameter of Earth if it is more dense. I think surface gravity would also vary proportionally to density. That being said, if we are talking about planets we've actually observed I don't think there is one even double the density of Earth.
      $endgroup$
      – ben
      22 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      This doesn't really affect the thrust of your point, but the planet doesn't have to have 12x the diameter of Earth if it is more dense. I think surface gravity would also vary proportionally to density. That being said, if we are talking about planets we've actually observed I don't think there is one even double the density of Earth.
      $endgroup$
      – ben
      22 hours ago











      7












      $begingroup$

      Likely, but not guaranteed. Consider a large rocky planet very close to its star. There is certainly a possibility that the atmosphere would be boiled off / stripped away by the star.



      This would be the case if, for instance, Mercury were orders of magnitude more massive. If your large rocky planet is close enough to its star to make this case true, you will have to deal with strange conditions for your character. One example is the planet is likely to be tidally locked, with an extremely hot side always facing the star and an extremely cold side always facing away from the star.



      Whether humans have actually discovered a planet that meets these criteria is probably up for debate. Most inquiries into exoplanet atmospheres make the assumption that the existence or lack of atmosphere is unknown until the presence of an atmosphere is proven definitively.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        7












        $begingroup$

        Likely, but not guaranteed. Consider a large rocky planet very close to its star. There is certainly a possibility that the atmosphere would be boiled off / stripped away by the star.



        This would be the case if, for instance, Mercury were orders of magnitude more massive. If your large rocky planet is close enough to its star to make this case true, you will have to deal with strange conditions for your character. One example is the planet is likely to be tidally locked, with an extremely hot side always facing the star and an extremely cold side always facing away from the star.



        Whether humans have actually discovered a planet that meets these criteria is probably up for debate. Most inquiries into exoplanet atmospheres make the assumption that the existence or lack of atmosphere is unknown until the presence of an atmosphere is proven definitively.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$















          7












          7








          7





          $begingroup$

          Likely, but not guaranteed. Consider a large rocky planet very close to its star. There is certainly a possibility that the atmosphere would be boiled off / stripped away by the star.



          This would be the case if, for instance, Mercury were orders of magnitude more massive. If your large rocky planet is close enough to its star to make this case true, you will have to deal with strange conditions for your character. One example is the planet is likely to be tidally locked, with an extremely hot side always facing the star and an extremely cold side always facing away from the star.



          Whether humans have actually discovered a planet that meets these criteria is probably up for debate. Most inquiries into exoplanet atmospheres make the assumption that the existence or lack of atmosphere is unknown until the presence of an atmosphere is proven definitively.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Likely, but not guaranteed. Consider a large rocky planet very close to its star. There is certainly a possibility that the atmosphere would be boiled off / stripped away by the star.



          This would be the case if, for instance, Mercury were orders of magnitude more massive. If your large rocky planet is close enough to its star to make this case true, you will have to deal with strange conditions for your character. One example is the planet is likely to be tidally locked, with an extremely hot side always facing the star and an extremely cold side always facing away from the star.



          Whether humans have actually discovered a planet that meets these criteria is probably up for debate. Most inquiries into exoplanet atmospheres make the assumption that the existence or lack of atmosphere is unknown until the presence of an atmosphere is proven definitively.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Mar 27 at 21:36









          benben

          7867




          7867





















              6












              $begingroup$

              I think I see a scenario that could produce your world. Note that this is cataclysmic on an interstellar scale--life on nearby stars would have been eradicated.



              We need a system that starts out with three stars, two of which are a close binary and each star exceeds (but not by too much) 8 solar masses. The third star is more distant and somewhat smaller.



              The two big stars burn through their fuel and supernova, leaving behind neutron stars. The third is abused by these detonations but survives. The neutron stars are like their parents--a close binary. In time they spiral in and go splat--but enough mass is thrown off in the process to make your high-G world, from which a planet is born. (Note that I'm not sure it's possible for it to end up in a planet. The process is extremely energetic, it might be ejected too fast.)



              Now you have a neutron star or black hole, a super-planet and an ordinary star. Now it's time for our third star to die--this time more peacefully, to a white dwarf.



              This collection of debris encounters another star which ends up captured, the super-planet ending up in the life zone of the new star. The white dwarf sucks in matter from this fourth star, eventually you get a nova. This scours the atmosphere off the super-planet.



              You're now left with a super-planet with no atmosphere. It's going to be an incredibly dense world as much of the stuff thrown off from the neutron star impact is from the lower part of the periodic table.



              While you didn't ask for it this is going to be an immensely valuable source of heavy metals. (This is assuming it's worthwhile to ship such stuff. If you have a brute-force stardrive it probably isn't.)



              Note that this is a very dangerous star system to be in, the white dwarf will periodically nova (although a sufficiently advanced science should be able to predict the detonations) and if it sucks down enough matter it will be even worse when it collapses down to a neutron star. You also have the jets from the other neutron star or black hole, although they could be aimed in a safe direction.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                6












                $begingroup$

                I think I see a scenario that could produce your world. Note that this is cataclysmic on an interstellar scale--life on nearby stars would have been eradicated.



                We need a system that starts out with three stars, two of which are a close binary and each star exceeds (but not by too much) 8 solar masses. The third star is more distant and somewhat smaller.



                The two big stars burn through their fuel and supernova, leaving behind neutron stars. The third is abused by these detonations but survives. The neutron stars are like their parents--a close binary. In time they spiral in and go splat--but enough mass is thrown off in the process to make your high-G world, from which a planet is born. (Note that I'm not sure it's possible for it to end up in a planet. The process is extremely energetic, it might be ejected too fast.)



                Now you have a neutron star or black hole, a super-planet and an ordinary star. Now it's time for our third star to die--this time more peacefully, to a white dwarf.



                This collection of debris encounters another star which ends up captured, the super-planet ending up in the life zone of the new star. The white dwarf sucks in matter from this fourth star, eventually you get a nova. This scours the atmosphere off the super-planet.



                You're now left with a super-planet with no atmosphere. It's going to be an incredibly dense world as much of the stuff thrown off from the neutron star impact is from the lower part of the periodic table.



                While you didn't ask for it this is going to be an immensely valuable source of heavy metals. (This is assuming it's worthwhile to ship such stuff. If you have a brute-force stardrive it probably isn't.)



                Note that this is a very dangerous star system to be in, the white dwarf will periodically nova (although a sufficiently advanced science should be able to predict the detonations) and if it sucks down enough matter it will be even worse when it collapses down to a neutron star. You also have the jets from the other neutron star or black hole, although they could be aimed in a safe direction.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  6












                  6








                  6





                  $begingroup$

                  I think I see a scenario that could produce your world. Note that this is cataclysmic on an interstellar scale--life on nearby stars would have been eradicated.



                  We need a system that starts out with three stars, two of which are a close binary and each star exceeds (but not by too much) 8 solar masses. The third star is more distant and somewhat smaller.



                  The two big stars burn through their fuel and supernova, leaving behind neutron stars. The third is abused by these detonations but survives. The neutron stars are like their parents--a close binary. In time they spiral in and go splat--but enough mass is thrown off in the process to make your high-G world, from which a planet is born. (Note that I'm not sure it's possible for it to end up in a planet. The process is extremely energetic, it might be ejected too fast.)



                  Now you have a neutron star or black hole, a super-planet and an ordinary star. Now it's time for our third star to die--this time more peacefully, to a white dwarf.



                  This collection of debris encounters another star which ends up captured, the super-planet ending up in the life zone of the new star. The white dwarf sucks in matter from this fourth star, eventually you get a nova. This scours the atmosphere off the super-planet.



                  You're now left with a super-planet with no atmosphere. It's going to be an incredibly dense world as much of the stuff thrown off from the neutron star impact is from the lower part of the periodic table.



                  While you didn't ask for it this is going to be an immensely valuable source of heavy metals. (This is assuming it's worthwhile to ship such stuff. If you have a brute-force stardrive it probably isn't.)



                  Note that this is a very dangerous star system to be in, the white dwarf will periodically nova (although a sufficiently advanced science should be able to predict the detonations) and if it sucks down enough matter it will be even worse when it collapses down to a neutron star. You also have the jets from the other neutron star or black hole, although they could be aimed in a safe direction.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  I think I see a scenario that could produce your world. Note that this is cataclysmic on an interstellar scale--life on nearby stars would have been eradicated.



                  We need a system that starts out with three stars, two of which are a close binary and each star exceeds (but not by too much) 8 solar masses. The third star is more distant and somewhat smaller.



                  The two big stars burn through their fuel and supernova, leaving behind neutron stars. The third is abused by these detonations but survives. The neutron stars are like their parents--a close binary. In time they spiral in and go splat--but enough mass is thrown off in the process to make your high-G world, from which a planet is born. (Note that I'm not sure it's possible for it to end up in a planet. The process is extremely energetic, it might be ejected too fast.)



                  Now you have a neutron star or black hole, a super-planet and an ordinary star. Now it's time for our third star to die--this time more peacefully, to a white dwarf.



                  This collection of debris encounters another star which ends up captured, the super-planet ending up in the life zone of the new star. The white dwarf sucks in matter from this fourth star, eventually you get a nova. This scours the atmosphere off the super-planet.



                  You're now left with a super-planet with no atmosphere. It's going to be an incredibly dense world as much of the stuff thrown off from the neutron star impact is from the lower part of the periodic table.



                  While you didn't ask for it this is going to be an immensely valuable source of heavy metals. (This is assuming it's worthwhile to ship such stuff. If you have a brute-force stardrive it probably isn't.)



                  Note that this is a very dangerous star system to be in, the white dwarf will periodically nova (although a sufficiently advanced science should be able to predict the detonations) and if it sucks down enough matter it will be even worse when it collapses down to a neutron star. You also have the jets from the other neutron star or black hole, although they could be aimed in a safe direction.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Mar 28 at 0:48









                  Loren PechtelLoren Pechtel

                  19.9k2262




                  19.9k2262





















                      3












                      $begingroup$

                      Heavy metal world.



                      1. 12G planet. You could ramp up the gravity by making the core more dense. Our planet has an iron / nickel core under the rocks, and those have atomic weights of 55 and 58. Uranium has an atomic weight of 238. So if you made the core out of uranium and other heavy friends your density is 5x that of earth. Those elements are rarer than iron but not crazy rare. Now your planet only needs to be 2.4x as big as earth to have your 12G. If you want your planet even smaller, you can invoke the stable superheavy elements from the undiscovered far reaches of the periodic table - the island of stability

                      There could be other cool things about the uranium planet. Maybe natural fission goes on deep inside, which would make for rocking volcanoes. Could you take advantage of this to get off planet? Hmm... Also, the atmosphere would have a lot of radon, which would give everyone very low voices among other things.



                      1. My understanding of atmosphere is that you need a magnetosphere to keep it in, gravity notwithstanding. Otherwise the solar wind will strip it away. Mars lost its magnetosphere and then lost its atmosphere because of that. No reason to think that the heavy planet would not have a magnetosphere.





                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$








                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        Important to bear in mind that a planet whose core was composed of uranium would detonate. Furthermore, neither the uranium planet nor one composed of transuranic elements from the 'island of stability', can form in nature.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Arkenstein XII
                        Mar 27 at 23:25






                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        Only if it had significant U-235, Uranium-238 is really no danger.
                        $endgroup$
                        – user2617804
                        Mar 28 at 7:52






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        While the core is important, don't forget to account for the amount of comparatively light elements in the mantle that are making up the actual bulk of Earth's mass and volume. - Swap out all the oxygen, silicon, and friends for stuff nearer lead, and the nickle and iron for something even heavier...
                        $endgroup$
                        – TheLuckless
                        Mar 28 at 16:24















                      3












                      $begingroup$

                      Heavy metal world.



                      1. 12G planet. You could ramp up the gravity by making the core more dense. Our planet has an iron / nickel core under the rocks, and those have atomic weights of 55 and 58. Uranium has an atomic weight of 238. So if you made the core out of uranium and other heavy friends your density is 5x that of earth. Those elements are rarer than iron but not crazy rare. Now your planet only needs to be 2.4x as big as earth to have your 12G. If you want your planet even smaller, you can invoke the stable superheavy elements from the undiscovered far reaches of the periodic table - the island of stability

                      There could be other cool things about the uranium planet. Maybe natural fission goes on deep inside, which would make for rocking volcanoes. Could you take advantage of this to get off planet? Hmm... Also, the atmosphere would have a lot of radon, which would give everyone very low voices among other things.



                      1. My understanding of atmosphere is that you need a magnetosphere to keep it in, gravity notwithstanding. Otherwise the solar wind will strip it away. Mars lost its magnetosphere and then lost its atmosphere because of that. No reason to think that the heavy planet would not have a magnetosphere.





                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$








                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        Important to bear in mind that a planet whose core was composed of uranium would detonate. Furthermore, neither the uranium planet nor one composed of transuranic elements from the 'island of stability', can form in nature.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Arkenstein XII
                        Mar 27 at 23:25






                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        Only if it had significant U-235, Uranium-238 is really no danger.
                        $endgroup$
                        – user2617804
                        Mar 28 at 7:52






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        While the core is important, don't forget to account for the amount of comparatively light elements in the mantle that are making up the actual bulk of Earth's mass and volume. - Swap out all the oxygen, silicon, and friends for stuff nearer lead, and the nickle and iron for something even heavier...
                        $endgroup$
                        – TheLuckless
                        Mar 28 at 16:24













                      3












                      3








                      3





                      $begingroup$

                      Heavy metal world.



                      1. 12G planet. You could ramp up the gravity by making the core more dense. Our planet has an iron / nickel core under the rocks, and those have atomic weights of 55 and 58. Uranium has an atomic weight of 238. So if you made the core out of uranium and other heavy friends your density is 5x that of earth. Those elements are rarer than iron but not crazy rare. Now your planet only needs to be 2.4x as big as earth to have your 12G. If you want your planet even smaller, you can invoke the stable superheavy elements from the undiscovered far reaches of the periodic table - the island of stability

                      There could be other cool things about the uranium planet. Maybe natural fission goes on deep inside, which would make for rocking volcanoes. Could you take advantage of this to get off planet? Hmm... Also, the atmosphere would have a lot of radon, which would give everyone very low voices among other things.



                      1. My understanding of atmosphere is that you need a magnetosphere to keep it in, gravity notwithstanding. Otherwise the solar wind will strip it away. Mars lost its magnetosphere and then lost its atmosphere because of that. No reason to think that the heavy planet would not have a magnetosphere.





                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



                      Heavy metal world.



                      1. 12G planet. You could ramp up the gravity by making the core more dense. Our planet has an iron / nickel core under the rocks, and those have atomic weights of 55 and 58. Uranium has an atomic weight of 238. So if you made the core out of uranium and other heavy friends your density is 5x that of earth. Those elements are rarer than iron but not crazy rare. Now your planet only needs to be 2.4x as big as earth to have your 12G. If you want your planet even smaller, you can invoke the stable superheavy elements from the undiscovered far reaches of the periodic table - the island of stability

                      There could be other cool things about the uranium planet. Maybe natural fission goes on deep inside, which would make for rocking volcanoes. Could you take advantage of this to get off planet? Hmm... Also, the atmosphere would have a lot of radon, which would give everyone very low voices among other things.



                      1. My understanding of atmosphere is that you need a magnetosphere to keep it in, gravity notwithstanding. Otherwise the solar wind will strip it away. Mars lost its magnetosphere and then lost its atmosphere because of that. No reason to think that the heavy planet would not have a magnetosphere.






                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered Mar 27 at 22:42









                      WillkWillk

                      116k27219487




                      116k27219487







                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        Important to bear in mind that a planet whose core was composed of uranium would detonate. Furthermore, neither the uranium planet nor one composed of transuranic elements from the 'island of stability', can form in nature.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Arkenstein XII
                        Mar 27 at 23:25






                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        Only if it had significant U-235, Uranium-238 is really no danger.
                        $endgroup$
                        – user2617804
                        Mar 28 at 7:52






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        While the core is important, don't forget to account for the amount of comparatively light elements in the mantle that are making up the actual bulk of Earth's mass and volume. - Swap out all the oxygen, silicon, and friends for stuff nearer lead, and the nickle and iron for something even heavier...
                        $endgroup$
                        – TheLuckless
                        Mar 28 at 16:24












                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        Important to bear in mind that a planet whose core was composed of uranium would detonate. Furthermore, neither the uranium planet nor one composed of transuranic elements from the 'island of stability', can form in nature.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Arkenstein XII
                        Mar 27 at 23:25






                      • 2




                        $begingroup$
                        Only if it had significant U-235, Uranium-238 is really no danger.
                        $endgroup$
                        – user2617804
                        Mar 28 at 7:52






                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        While the core is important, don't forget to account for the amount of comparatively light elements in the mantle that are making up the actual bulk of Earth's mass and volume. - Swap out all the oxygen, silicon, and friends for stuff nearer lead, and the nickle and iron for something even heavier...
                        $endgroup$
                        – TheLuckless
                        Mar 28 at 16:24







                      2




                      2




                      $begingroup$
                      Important to bear in mind that a planet whose core was composed of uranium would detonate. Furthermore, neither the uranium planet nor one composed of transuranic elements from the 'island of stability', can form in nature.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Arkenstein XII
                      Mar 27 at 23:25




                      $begingroup$
                      Important to bear in mind that a planet whose core was composed of uranium would detonate. Furthermore, neither the uranium planet nor one composed of transuranic elements from the 'island of stability', can form in nature.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Arkenstein XII
                      Mar 27 at 23:25




                      2




                      2




                      $begingroup$
                      Only if it had significant U-235, Uranium-238 is really no danger.
                      $endgroup$
                      – user2617804
                      Mar 28 at 7:52




                      $begingroup$
                      Only if it had significant U-235, Uranium-238 is really no danger.
                      $endgroup$
                      – user2617804
                      Mar 28 at 7:52




                      1




                      1




                      $begingroup$
                      While the core is important, don't forget to account for the amount of comparatively light elements in the mantle that are making up the actual bulk of Earth's mass and volume. - Swap out all the oxygen, silicon, and friends for stuff nearer lead, and the nickle and iron for something even heavier...
                      $endgroup$
                      – TheLuckless
                      Mar 28 at 16:24




                      $begingroup$
                      While the core is important, don't forget to account for the amount of comparatively light elements in the mantle that are making up the actual bulk of Earth's mass and volume. - Swap out all the oxygen, silicon, and friends for stuff nearer lead, and the nickle and iron for something even heavier...
                      $endgroup$
                      – TheLuckless
                      Mar 28 at 16:24

















                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142617%2fwould-a-high-gravity-rocky-planet-be-guaranteed-to-have-an-atmosphere%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Adding axes to figuresAdding axes labels to LaTeX figuresLaTeX equivalent of ConTeXt buffersRotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?adding axes to shapesAlign axes across subfiguresAdding figures with a certain orderLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themAdding axes labels to LaTeX figures

                      Tähtien Talli Jäsenet | Lähteet | NavigointivalikkoSuomen Hippos – Tähtien Talli

                      Do these cracks on my tires look bad? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowDry rot tire should I replace?Having to replace tiresFishtailed so easily? Bad tires? ABS?Filling the tires with something other than air, to avoid puncture hassles?Used Michelin tires safe to install?Do these tyre cracks necessitate replacement?Rumbling noise: tires or mechanicalIs it possible to fix noisy feathered tires?Are bad winter tires still better than summer tires in winter?Torque converter failure - Related to replacing only 2 tires?Why use snow tires on all 4 wheels on 2-wheel-drive cars?