Building Image Dataset In a Studio2019 Community Moderator ElectionHow to prepare/augment images for neural network?Fashion Clothing images Dataset with image descriptionGiven that two images are similar, how do I find and classify the difference between them?Large Numpy.Array for Multi-label Image Classification (CelebA Dataset)Image dataset with timestamps?image dataset uploading in google colabDataset image size and inference speedMask RCNN detecting object but mask is inaccurateImage classification using Semantic Segmented ImagesUsing a discriminator to distinguish ground truth and predicted boxes for FRCNN

Why doesn't H₄O²⁺ exist?

Can a vampire attack twice with their claws using multiattack?

Can a monk's single staff be considered dual wielded, as per the Dual Wielder feat?

Accidentally leaked the solution to an assignment, what to do now? (I'm the prof)

Can I make popcorn with any corn?

Client team has low performances and low technical skills: we always fix their work and now they stop collaborate with us. How to solve?

Replacing matching entries in one column of a file by another column from a different file

Languages that we cannot (dis)prove to be Context-Free

Are the number of citations and number of published articles the most important criteria for a tenure promotion?

Why doesn't a class having private constructor prevent inheriting from this class? How to control which classes can inherit from a certain base?

How is it possible to have an ability score that is less than 3?

Do I have a twin with permutated remainders?

Modeling an IP Address

Is it inappropriate for a student to attend their mentor's dissertation defense?

Could an aircraft fly or hover using only jets of compressed air?

DC-DC converter from low voltage at high current, to high voltage at low current

Approximately how much travel time was saved by the opening of the Suez Canal in 1869?

How much of data wrangling is a data scientist's job?

How is the claim "I am in New York only if I am in America" the same as "If I am in New York, then I am in America?

Maximum likelihood parameters deviate from posterior distributions

Is it unprofessional to ask if a job posting on GlassDoor is real?

Convert two switches to a dual stack, and add outlet - possible here?

Decision tree nodes overlapping with Tikz

What is a clear way to write a bar that has an extra beat?



Building Image Dataset In a Studio



2019 Community Moderator ElectionHow to prepare/augment images for neural network?Fashion Clothing images Dataset with image descriptionGiven that two images are similar, how do I find and classify the difference between them?Large Numpy.Array for Multi-label Image Classification (CelebA Dataset)Image dataset with timestamps?image dataset uploading in google colabDataset image size and inference speedMask RCNN detecting object but mask is inaccurateImage classification using Semantic Segmented ImagesUsing a discriminator to distinguish ground truth and predicted boxes for FRCNN










0












$begingroup$


I'm currently working in a problem of Object Detection, more specifically we want to count and differentiate similar species of moths.



We are already testing some detection algorithms:



  • YOLOv3

  • RetinaNet


  • Mask R-CNN

For the datasets, first we'll scrape the web for those images to have a starting model.



Then we'll get plenty of pictures from our devices that will look like this:



glued moths



Unfortunately it will take 6 months to get those pictures.



Currently we have some samples of moths, and we have the resources to take pictures of them in a studio. We want to simulate the field conditions as well as taking close ups of the moths in different angles and lighting conditions. This experiment would also allow for us to get the accuracy of classification from an expert entomologist.



Is the effort of taking studio photos worth it?



Would these pictures significantly increase the models accuracy?



Is there any opportunity for publication?



Is there any paper that uses studio photos as well as field photos for object detection?



Also, there's plenty of opportunities for publication here in the company, so they would go the extra mile if we publish something, or if these pictures would improve the final accuracy of the models.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    I gave you a answer, but be aware this kind of question is primaly opinion based and can't have a definitive answer. Also, even tho you plan to use Convolutional Neural Networks or any Deep Learning Tools, your question does not have a mention of these methods, that said I think it is not correct of you to use those flags.
    $endgroup$
    – Pedro Henrique Monforte
    Mar 28 at 2:31










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the answer and the feedback. I will be editing the question to include the methods we'll try.
    $endgroup$
    – Luiz Amaral
    Mar 28 at 12:21
















0












$begingroup$


I'm currently working in a problem of Object Detection, more specifically we want to count and differentiate similar species of moths.



We are already testing some detection algorithms:



  • YOLOv3

  • RetinaNet


  • Mask R-CNN

For the datasets, first we'll scrape the web for those images to have a starting model.



Then we'll get plenty of pictures from our devices that will look like this:



glued moths



Unfortunately it will take 6 months to get those pictures.



Currently we have some samples of moths, and we have the resources to take pictures of them in a studio. We want to simulate the field conditions as well as taking close ups of the moths in different angles and lighting conditions. This experiment would also allow for us to get the accuracy of classification from an expert entomologist.



Is the effort of taking studio photos worth it?



Would these pictures significantly increase the models accuracy?



Is there any opportunity for publication?



Is there any paper that uses studio photos as well as field photos for object detection?



Also, there's plenty of opportunities for publication here in the company, so they would go the extra mile if we publish something, or if these pictures would improve the final accuracy of the models.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    I gave you a answer, but be aware this kind of question is primaly opinion based and can't have a definitive answer. Also, even tho you plan to use Convolutional Neural Networks or any Deep Learning Tools, your question does not have a mention of these methods, that said I think it is not correct of you to use those flags.
    $endgroup$
    – Pedro Henrique Monforte
    Mar 28 at 2:31










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the answer and the feedback. I will be editing the question to include the methods we'll try.
    $endgroup$
    – Luiz Amaral
    Mar 28 at 12:21














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I'm currently working in a problem of Object Detection, more specifically we want to count and differentiate similar species of moths.



We are already testing some detection algorithms:



  • YOLOv3

  • RetinaNet


  • Mask R-CNN

For the datasets, first we'll scrape the web for those images to have a starting model.



Then we'll get plenty of pictures from our devices that will look like this:



glued moths



Unfortunately it will take 6 months to get those pictures.



Currently we have some samples of moths, and we have the resources to take pictures of them in a studio. We want to simulate the field conditions as well as taking close ups of the moths in different angles and lighting conditions. This experiment would also allow for us to get the accuracy of classification from an expert entomologist.



Is the effort of taking studio photos worth it?



Would these pictures significantly increase the models accuracy?



Is there any opportunity for publication?



Is there any paper that uses studio photos as well as field photos for object detection?



Also, there's plenty of opportunities for publication here in the company, so they would go the extra mile if we publish something, or if these pictures would improve the final accuracy of the models.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I'm currently working in a problem of Object Detection, more specifically we want to count and differentiate similar species of moths.



We are already testing some detection algorithms:



  • YOLOv3

  • RetinaNet


  • Mask R-CNN

For the datasets, first we'll scrape the web for those images to have a starting model.



Then we'll get plenty of pictures from our devices that will look like this:



glued moths



Unfortunately it will take 6 months to get those pictures.



Currently we have some samples of moths, and we have the resources to take pictures of them in a studio. We want to simulate the field conditions as well as taking close ups of the moths in different angles and lighting conditions. This experiment would also allow for us to get the accuracy of classification from an expert entomologist.



Is the effort of taking studio photos worth it?



Would these pictures significantly increase the models accuracy?



Is there any opportunity for publication?



Is there any paper that uses studio photos as well as field photos for object detection?



Also, there's plenty of opportunities for publication here in the company, so they would go the extra mile if we publish something, or if these pictures would improve the final accuracy of the models.







deep-learning dataset cnn image-classification faster-rcnn






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 28 at 12:40







Luiz Amaral

















asked Mar 27 at 21:15









Luiz AmaralLuiz Amaral

12




12











  • $begingroup$
    I gave you a answer, but be aware this kind of question is primaly opinion based and can't have a definitive answer. Also, even tho you plan to use Convolutional Neural Networks or any Deep Learning Tools, your question does not have a mention of these methods, that said I think it is not correct of you to use those flags.
    $endgroup$
    – Pedro Henrique Monforte
    Mar 28 at 2:31










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the answer and the feedback. I will be editing the question to include the methods we'll try.
    $endgroup$
    – Luiz Amaral
    Mar 28 at 12:21

















  • $begingroup$
    I gave you a answer, but be aware this kind of question is primaly opinion based and can't have a definitive answer. Also, even tho you plan to use Convolutional Neural Networks or any Deep Learning Tools, your question does not have a mention of these methods, that said I think it is not correct of you to use those flags.
    $endgroup$
    – Pedro Henrique Monforte
    Mar 28 at 2:31










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks for the answer and the feedback. I will be editing the question to include the methods we'll try.
    $endgroup$
    – Luiz Amaral
    Mar 28 at 12:21
















$begingroup$
I gave you a answer, but be aware this kind of question is primaly opinion based and can't have a definitive answer. Also, even tho you plan to use Convolutional Neural Networks or any Deep Learning Tools, your question does not have a mention of these methods, that said I think it is not correct of you to use those flags.
$endgroup$
– Pedro Henrique Monforte
Mar 28 at 2:31




$begingroup$
I gave you a answer, but be aware this kind of question is primaly opinion based and can't have a definitive answer. Also, even tho you plan to use Convolutional Neural Networks or any Deep Learning Tools, your question does not have a mention of these methods, that said I think it is not correct of you to use those flags.
$endgroup$
– Pedro Henrique Monforte
Mar 28 at 2:31












$begingroup$
Thanks for the answer and the feedback. I will be editing the question to include the methods we'll try.
$endgroup$
– Luiz Amaral
Mar 28 at 12:21





$begingroup$
Thanks for the answer and the feedback. I will be editing the question to include the methods we'll try.
$endgroup$
– Luiz Amaral
Mar 28 at 12:21











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Disclaimer:



This is a question that is probably going to be flagged since it is too broad and answers will be mainly based on opinion.



Is this effort worth it?



That is subjective, what commercial/social use does this have? Is this kind of detection really relevant? What can you do with those detections and classifications? That is something only an entomologist could answer properly, you will get better answers for this one with them.



If you can find this kind of motivations for your work, you probably get a good dataset with good use. But if you don't even know what kind of applications you're aiming to you should start doing more research on motivation.



Would these pictures significantly increase the model's accuracy?



It is highly probable that it will, but you can't be sure until you try. Also, train your models with recently acquired images during the acquisition process to make sure that those images are having an impact on your models.



Is there any opportunity for publication?



Surely there is, if it will be cited multiple times or if the paper will be well received by Machine Learning community? Probably. If not, that probably would get you a top publication on entomology.



Is there any paper that uses studio photos as well as field photos for object detection?



Well, there are many. These controlled datasets are pretty easy to come up with and have been used extensively see BioID for example, until today many publications use it for benchmarking on Eye Pupil Detection and Facial Landmark Detection. In the wild datasets (usually collected from the web) are usually more challenging and also more fitted to real-world application, but it is not always possible to acquire them easily.



Last year CEFET-RJ and UFRJ published papers in IEEE with created datasets for Aedes Aegypti breeding sites detection. This dataset was created using drones and manually annotated by CEFET-RJ and UFRJ undergrad students.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "557"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f48109%2fbuilding-image-dataset-in-a-studio%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Disclaimer:



    This is a question that is probably going to be flagged since it is too broad and answers will be mainly based on opinion.



    Is this effort worth it?



    That is subjective, what commercial/social use does this have? Is this kind of detection really relevant? What can you do with those detections and classifications? That is something only an entomologist could answer properly, you will get better answers for this one with them.



    If you can find this kind of motivations for your work, you probably get a good dataset with good use. But if you don't even know what kind of applications you're aiming to you should start doing more research on motivation.



    Would these pictures significantly increase the model's accuracy?



    It is highly probable that it will, but you can't be sure until you try. Also, train your models with recently acquired images during the acquisition process to make sure that those images are having an impact on your models.



    Is there any opportunity for publication?



    Surely there is, if it will be cited multiple times or if the paper will be well received by Machine Learning community? Probably. If not, that probably would get you a top publication on entomology.



    Is there any paper that uses studio photos as well as field photos for object detection?



    Well, there are many. These controlled datasets are pretty easy to come up with and have been used extensively see BioID for example, until today many publications use it for benchmarking on Eye Pupil Detection and Facial Landmark Detection. In the wild datasets (usually collected from the web) are usually more challenging and also more fitted to real-world application, but it is not always possible to acquire them easily.



    Last year CEFET-RJ and UFRJ published papers in IEEE with created datasets for Aedes Aegypti breeding sites detection. This dataset was created using drones and manually annotated by CEFET-RJ and UFRJ undergrad students.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      1












      $begingroup$

      Disclaimer:



      This is a question that is probably going to be flagged since it is too broad and answers will be mainly based on opinion.



      Is this effort worth it?



      That is subjective, what commercial/social use does this have? Is this kind of detection really relevant? What can you do with those detections and classifications? That is something only an entomologist could answer properly, you will get better answers for this one with them.



      If you can find this kind of motivations for your work, you probably get a good dataset with good use. But if you don't even know what kind of applications you're aiming to you should start doing more research on motivation.



      Would these pictures significantly increase the model's accuracy?



      It is highly probable that it will, but you can't be sure until you try. Also, train your models with recently acquired images during the acquisition process to make sure that those images are having an impact on your models.



      Is there any opportunity for publication?



      Surely there is, if it will be cited multiple times or if the paper will be well received by Machine Learning community? Probably. If not, that probably would get you a top publication on entomology.



      Is there any paper that uses studio photos as well as field photos for object detection?



      Well, there are many. These controlled datasets are pretty easy to come up with and have been used extensively see BioID for example, until today many publications use it for benchmarking on Eye Pupil Detection and Facial Landmark Detection. In the wild datasets (usually collected from the web) are usually more challenging and also more fitted to real-world application, but it is not always possible to acquire them easily.



      Last year CEFET-RJ and UFRJ published papers in IEEE with created datasets for Aedes Aegypti breeding sites detection. This dataset was created using drones and manually annotated by CEFET-RJ and UFRJ undergrad students.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Disclaimer:



        This is a question that is probably going to be flagged since it is too broad and answers will be mainly based on opinion.



        Is this effort worth it?



        That is subjective, what commercial/social use does this have? Is this kind of detection really relevant? What can you do with those detections and classifications? That is something only an entomologist could answer properly, you will get better answers for this one with them.



        If you can find this kind of motivations for your work, you probably get a good dataset with good use. But if you don't even know what kind of applications you're aiming to you should start doing more research on motivation.



        Would these pictures significantly increase the model's accuracy?



        It is highly probable that it will, but you can't be sure until you try. Also, train your models with recently acquired images during the acquisition process to make sure that those images are having an impact on your models.



        Is there any opportunity for publication?



        Surely there is, if it will be cited multiple times or if the paper will be well received by Machine Learning community? Probably. If not, that probably would get you a top publication on entomology.



        Is there any paper that uses studio photos as well as field photos for object detection?



        Well, there are many. These controlled datasets are pretty easy to come up with and have been used extensively see BioID for example, until today many publications use it for benchmarking on Eye Pupil Detection and Facial Landmark Detection. In the wild datasets (usually collected from the web) are usually more challenging and also more fitted to real-world application, but it is not always possible to acquire them easily.



        Last year CEFET-RJ and UFRJ published papers in IEEE with created datasets for Aedes Aegypti breeding sites detection. This dataset was created using drones and manually annotated by CEFET-RJ and UFRJ undergrad students.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Disclaimer:



        This is a question that is probably going to be flagged since it is too broad and answers will be mainly based on opinion.



        Is this effort worth it?



        That is subjective, what commercial/social use does this have? Is this kind of detection really relevant? What can you do with those detections and classifications? That is something only an entomologist could answer properly, you will get better answers for this one with them.



        If you can find this kind of motivations for your work, you probably get a good dataset with good use. But if you don't even know what kind of applications you're aiming to you should start doing more research on motivation.



        Would these pictures significantly increase the model's accuracy?



        It is highly probable that it will, but you can't be sure until you try. Also, train your models with recently acquired images during the acquisition process to make sure that those images are having an impact on your models.



        Is there any opportunity for publication?



        Surely there is, if it will be cited multiple times or if the paper will be well received by Machine Learning community? Probably. If not, that probably would get you a top publication on entomology.



        Is there any paper that uses studio photos as well as field photos for object detection?



        Well, there are many. These controlled datasets are pretty easy to come up with and have been used extensively see BioID for example, until today many publications use it for benchmarking on Eye Pupil Detection and Facial Landmark Detection. In the wild datasets (usually collected from the web) are usually more challenging and also more fitted to real-world application, but it is not always possible to acquire them easily.



        Last year CEFET-RJ and UFRJ published papers in IEEE with created datasets for Aedes Aegypti breeding sites detection. This dataset was created using drones and manually annotated by CEFET-RJ and UFRJ undergrad students.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        answered Mar 28 at 2:25


























        community wiki





        Pedro Henrique Monforte




























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f48109%2fbuilding-image-dataset-in-a-studio%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Adding axes to figuresAdding axes labels to LaTeX figuresLaTeX equivalent of ConTeXt buffersRotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?adding axes to shapesAlign axes across subfiguresAdding figures with a certain orderLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themAdding axes labels to LaTeX figures

            Luettelo Yhdysvaltain laivaston lentotukialuksista Lähteet | Navigointivalikko

            Gary (muusikko) Sisällysluettelo Historia | Rockin' High | Lähteet | Aiheesta muualla | NavigointivalikkoInfobox OKTuomas "Gary" Keskinen Ancaran kitaristiksiProjekti Rockin' High