Irreducibility of a simple polynomialShow $x^6 + 1.5x^5 + 3x - 4.5$ is irreducible in $mathbb Q[x]$.Determine whether the polynomial $x^2-12$ in $mathbb Z[x]$ satisfies an Eisenstein criterion for irreducibility over $mathbb Q$Proving Irreducibility of $x^4-16x^3+20x^2+12$ in $mathbb Q[x]$Constructibility of roots of a polynomialEisenstein's criterion for polynomials in Z mod pProving irreducibility; What is this method and what is the logic behind it?Irreducibility of special cyclotomic polynomial.Irreducibility of a Polynomial after a substitutionIrreducibility of Non-monic Quartic Polynomials in Q[x]Irreducible monic polynomial in $mathbbQ[x]$
Revoked SSL certificate
How to format long polynomial?
What would happen to a modern skyscraper if it rains micro blackholes?
Approximately how much travel time was saved by the opening of the Suez Canal in 1869?
Do infinite dimensional systems make sense?
if condition in the past
DC-DC converter from low voltage at high current, to high voltage at low current
Is it unprofessional to ask if a job posting on GlassDoor is real?
If human space travel is limited by the G force vulnerability, is there a way to counter G forces?
How is the claim "I am in New York only if I am in America" the same as "If I am in New York, then I am in America?
Important Resources for Dark Age Civilizations?
meaning of に in 本当に?
expand `ifthenelse` immediately
Languages that we cannot (dis)prove to be Context-Free
Why can't we play rap on piano?
Can a Cauchy sequence converge for one metric while not converging for another?
Can I ask the recruiters in my resume to put the reason why I am rejected?
What defenses are there against being summoned by the Gate spell?
Convert two switches to a dual stack, and add outlet - possible here?
Why is 150k or 200k jobs considered good when there's 300k+ births a month?
Why are electrically insulating heatsinks so rare? Is it just cost?
When a company launches a new product do they "come out" with a new product or do they "come up" with a new product?
Why am I being followed by a political opponent in Twitter?
Are astronomers waiting to see something in an image from a gravitational lens that they've already seen in an adjacent image?
Irreducibility of a simple polynomial
Show $x^6 + 1.5x^5 + 3x - 4.5$ is irreducible in $mathbb Q[x]$.Determine whether the polynomial $x^2-12$ in $mathbb Z[x]$ satisfies an Eisenstein criterion for irreducibility over $mathbb Q$Proving Irreducibility of $x^4-16x^3+20x^2+12$ in $mathbb Q[x]$Constructibility of roots of a polynomialEisenstein's criterion for polynomials in Z mod pProving irreducibility; What is this method and what is the logic behind it?Irreducibility of special cyclotomic polynomial.Irreducibility of a Polynomial after a substitutionIrreducibility of Non-monic Quartic Polynomials in Q[x]Irreducible monic polynomial in $mathbbQ[x]$
$begingroup$
For an integer $a$, I'm trying to find a criterion to tell me if $x^4+a^2$ is irreducible over $mathbbQ$.
What I've done so far is shown that if $a$ is odd, then $a^2$ is congruent to $1 mod 4$, and so the Eisenstein criterion with $p = 2$ tells me that $(x+1)^4 + a^2$ is irreducible and hence $x^4+a^2$ is irreducible.
For $a$ even I have had no such luck. I know that the polynomial is not irreducible for all such $a$ because when $a = 2$, for example, we have the factorization $x^4+4 = (x^2-2x+2)(x^2+2x+2)$. It's easy to show that this polynomial has no linear factors, but I'm at a loss trying to decide when there are a pair of irreducible quadratic factors.
A thought I had was to try and consider when $mathbbQ(sqrtai)$ is a degree $4$ extension, but this didn't seem to help.
abstract-algebra field-theory irreducible-polynomials
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For an integer $a$, I'm trying to find a criterion to tell me if $x^4+a^2$ is irreducible over $mathbbQ$.
What I've done so far is shown that if $a$ is odd, then $a^2$ is congruent to $1 mod 4$, and so the Eisenstein criterion with $p = 2$ tells me that $(x+1)^4 + a^2$ is irreducible and hence $x^4+a^2$ is irreducible.
For $a$ even I have had no such luck. I know that the polynomial is not irreducible for all such $a$ because when $a = 2$, for example, we have the factorization $x^4+4 = (x^2-2x+2)(x^2+2x+2)$. It's easy to show that this polynomial has no linear factors, but I'm at a loss trying to decide when there are a pair of irreducible quadratic factors.
A thought I had was to try and consider when $mathbbQ(sqrtai)$ is a degree $4$ extension, but this didn't seem to help.
abstract-algebra field-theory irreducible-polynomials
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
If $a=2n^2$, then $x^4+a^2=x^4+(2n^2)^2=(x^2-2nx+2n^2)(x^2+2nx+2n^2)$. In other cases it seems to be irreducible.
$endgroup$
– Sil
Mar 26 at 21:08
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For an integer $a$, I'm trying to find a criterion to tell me if $x^4+a^2$ is irreducible over $mathbbQ$.
What I've done so far is shown that if $a$ is odd, then $a^2$ is congruent to $1 mod 4$, and so the Eisenstein criterion with $p = 2$ tells me that $(x+1)^4 + a^2$ is irreducible and hence $x^4+a^2$ is irreducible.
For $a$ even I have had no such luck. I know that the polynomial is not irreducible for all such $a$ because when $a = 2$, for example, we have the factorization $x^4+4 = (x^2-2x+2)(x^2+2x+2)$. It's easy to show that this polynomial has no linear factors, but I'm at a loss trying to decide when there are a pair of irreducible quadratic factors.
A thought I had was to try and consider when $mathbbQ(sqrtai)$ is a degree $4$ extension, but this didn't seem to help.
abstract-algebra field-theory irreducible-polynomials
$endgroup$
For an integer $a$, I'm trying to find a criterion to tell me if $x^4+a^2$ is irreducible over $mathbbQ$.
What I've done so far is shown that if $a$ is odd, then $a^2$ is congruent to $1 mod 4$, and so the Eisenstein criterion with $p = 2$ tells me that $(x+1)^4 + a^2$ is irreducible and hence $x^4+a^2$ is irreducible.
For $a$ even I have had no such luck. I know that the polynomial is not irreducible for all such $a$ because when $a = 2$, for example, we have the factorization $x^4+4 = (x^2-2x+2)(x^2+2x+2)$. It's easy to show that this polynomial has no linear factors, but I'm at a loss trying to decide when there are a pair of irreducible quadratic factors.
A thought I had was to try and consider when $mathbbQ(sqrtai)$ is a degree $4$ extension, but this didn't seem to help.
abstract-algebra field-theory irreducible-polynomials
abstract-algebra field-theory irreducible-polynomials
asked Mar 26 at 20:53
JonHalesJonHales
520311
520311
2
$begingroup$
If $a=2n^2$, then $x^4+a^2=x^4+(2n^2)^2=(x^2-2nx+2n^2)(x^2+2nx+2n^2)$. In other cases it seems to be irreducible.
$endgroup$
– Sil
Mar 26 at 21:08
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
If $a=2n^2$, then $x^4+a^2=x^4+(2n^2)^2=(x^2-2nx+2n^2)(x^2+2nx+2n^2)$. In other cases it seems to be irreducible.
$endgroup$
– Sil
Mar 26 at 21:08
2
2
$begingroup$
If $a=2n^2$, then $x^4+a^2=x^4+(2n^2)^2=(x^2-2nx+2n^2)(x^2+2nx+2n^2)$. In other cases it seems to be irreducible.
$endgroup$
– Sil
Mar 26 at 21:08
$begingroup$
If $a=2n^2$, then $x^4+a^2=x^4+(2n^2)^2=(x^2-2nx+2n^2)(x^2+2nx+2n^2)$. In other cases it seems to be irreducible.
$endgroup$
– Sil
Mar 26 at 21:08
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Assuming, without loss of generality, $a>0$, the polynomial can be rewritten as
$$
x^4+2ax^2+a^2-2ax^2=(x^2+a)^2-(sqrt2ax)^2=
(x^2-sqrt2ax+a)(x^2+sqrt2ax+a)
$$
and it's obvious that the two polynomials are irreducible over $mathbbR$. By uniqueness of factorization, this is a factorization in $mathbbQ[x]$ if and only if $2a$ is a square in $mathbbQ$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Notice that we are trying to reduce that polynomial by this way:
$$x^4+a^2=(x^2-bx+a)(x^2+bx+a)=x^4+(2a-b^2)x^2+a^2$$
We need:
$$2a-b^2=0$$
$$b=sqrt2a$$
But since we are working on integers then $$a=2k^2$$ .So your polynomial is reducible if and only if it can be written i nthis form:
$$x^4+4k^4=(x^2-2kx+2k^2)(x^2+2kx+2k^2)$$
Which is also known as Sophie Germain Identity.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I think you should justify why $(x^2-bx+a)(x^2+bx+a)$ is the only possible form, and not generic $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$
$endgroup$
– Sil
Mar 26 at 21:27
$begingroup$
@Sil It's pretty easy with complex factorization. And it can also be done with a system of equations.
$endgroup$
– Eureka
Mar 26 at 21:30
1
$begingroup$
@Sil Try expanding out $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$ and look at the $x^3$ term to why $m=-p$. Then expand $(x^2-bx+n)(x^2+bx+q)$ and look at the $x$ term to see why $n=q$.
$endgroup$
– Ethan MacBrough
Mar 26 at 21:40
$begingroup$
@EthanMacBrough I understand, my point though was that things like that should be in answer itself.
$endgroup$
– Sil
Mar 26 at 21:42
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3163711%2firreducibility-of-a-simple-polynomial%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Assuming, without loss of generality, $a>0$, the polynomial can be rewritten as
$$
x^4+2ax^2+a^2-2ax^2=(x^2+a)^2-(sqrt2ax)^2=
(x^2-sqrt2ax+a)(x^2+sqrt2ax+a)
$$
and it's obvious that the two polynomials are irreducible over $mathbbR$. By uniqueness of factorization, this is a factorization in $mathbbQ[x]$ if and only if $2a$ is a square in $mathbbQ$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assuming, without loss of generality, $a>0$, the polynomial can be rewritten as
$$
x^4+2ax^2+a^2-2ax^2=(x^2+a)^2-(sqrt2ax)^2=
(x^2-sqrt2ax+a)(x^2+sqrt2ax+a)
$$
and it's obvious that the two polynomials are irreducible over $mathbbR$. By uniqueness of factorization, this is a factorization in $mathbbQ[x]$ if and only if $2a$ is a square in $mathbbQ$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Assuming, without loss of generality, $a>0$, the polynomial can be rewritten as
$$
x^4+2ax^2+a^2-2ax^2=(x^2+a)^2-(sqrt2ax)^2=
(x^2-sqrt2ax+a)(x^2+sqrt2ax+a)
$$
and it's obvious that the two polynomials are irreducible over $mathbbR$. By uniqueness of factorization, this is a factorization in $mathbbQ[x]$ if and only if $2a$ is a square in $mathbbQ$.
$endgroup$
Assuming, without loss of generality, $a>0$, the polynomial can be rewritten as
$$
x^4+2ax^2+a^2-2ax^2=(x^2+a)^2-(sqrt2ax)^2=
(x^2-sqrt2ax+a)(x^2+sqrt2ax+a)
$$
and it's obvious that the two polynomials are irreducible over $mathbbR$. By uniqueness of factorization, this is a factorization in $mathbbQ[x]$ if and only if $2a$ is a square in $mathbbQ$.
answered Mar 26 at 21:28
egregegreg
185k1486207
185k1486207
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Notice that we are trying to reduce that polynomial by this way:
$$x^4+a^2=(x^2-bx+a)(x^2+bx+a)=x^4+(2a-b^2)x^2+a^2$$
We need:
$$2a-b^2=0$$
$$b=sqrt2a$$
But since we are working on integers then $$a=2k^2$$ .So your polynomial is reducible if and only if it can be written i nthis form:
$$x^4+4k^4=(x^2-2kx+2k^2)(x^2+2kx+2k^2)$$
Which is also known as Sophie Germain Identity.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I think you should justify why $(x^2-bx+a)(x^2+bx+a)$ is the only possible form, and not generic $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$
$endgroup$
– Sil
Mar 26 at 21:27
$begingroup$
@Sil It's pretty easy with complex factorization. And it can also be done with a system of equations.
$endgroup$
– Eureka
Mar 26 at 21:30
1
$begingroup$
@Sil Try expanding out $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$ and look at the $x^3$ term to why $m=-p$. Then expand $(x^2-bx+n)(x^2+bx+q)$ and look at the $x$ term to see why $n=q$.
$endgroup$
– Ethan MacBrough
Mar 26 at 21:40
$begingroup$
@EthanMacBrough I understand, my point though was that things like that should be in answer itself.
$endgroup$
– Sil
Mar 26 at 21:42
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Notice that we are trying to reduce that polynomial by this way:
$$x^4+a^2=(x^2-bx+a)(x^2+bx+a)=x^4+(2a-b^2)x^2+a^2$$
We need:
$$2a-b^2=0$$
$$b=sqrt2a$$
But since we are working on integers then $$a=2k^2$$ .So your polynomial is reducible if and only if it can be written i nthis form:
$$x^4+4k^4=(x^2-2kx+2k^2)(x^2+2kx+2k^2)$$
Which is also known as Sophie Germain Identity.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I think you should justify why $(x^2-bx+a)(x^2+bx+a)$ is the only possible form, and not generic $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$
$endgroup$
– Sil
Mar 26 at 21:27
$begingroup$
@Sil It's pretty easy with complex factorization. And it can also be done with a system of equations.
$endgroup$
– Eureka
Mar 26 at 21:30
1
$begingroup$
@Sil Try expanding out $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$ and look at the $x^3$ term to why $m=-p$. Then expand $(x^2-bx+n)(x^2+bx+q)$ and look at the $x$ term to see why $n=q$.
$endgroup$
– Ethan MacBrough
Mar 26 at 21:40
$begingroup$
@EthanMacBrough I understand, my point though was that things like that should be in answer itself.
$endgroup$
– Sil
Mar 26 at 21:42
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Notice that we are trying to reduce that polynomial by this way:
$$x^4+a^2=(x^2-bx+a)(x^2+bx+a)=x^4+(2a-b^2)x^2+a^2$$
We need:
$$2a-b^2=0$$
$$b=sqrt2a$$
But since we are working on integers then $$a=2k^2$$ .So your polynomial is reducible if and only if it can be written i nthis form:
$$x^4+4k^4=(x^2-2kx+2k^2)(x^2+2kx+2k^2)$$
Which is also known as Sophie Germain Identity.
$endgroup$
Notice that we are trying to reduce that polynomial by this way:
$$x^4+a^2=(x^2-bx+a)(x^2+bx+a)=x^4+(2a-b^2)x^2+a^2$$
We need:
$$2a-b^2=0$$
$$b=sqrt2a$$
But since we are working on integers then $$a=2k^2$$ .So your polynomial is reducible if and only if it can be written i nthis form:
$$x^4+4k^4=(x^2-2kx+2k^2)(x^2+2kx+2k^2)$$
Which is also known as Sophie Germain Identity.
answered Mar 26 at 21:23
EurekaEureka
682113
682113
$begingroup$
I think you should justify why $(x^2-bx+a)(x^2+bx+a)$ is the only possible form, and not generic $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$
$endgroup$
– Sil
Mar 26 at 21:27
$begingroup$
@Sil It's pretty easy with complex factorization. And it can also be done with a system of equations.
$endgroup$
– Eureka
Mar 26 at 21:30
1
$begingroup$
@Sil Try expanding out $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$ and look at the $x^3$ term to why $m=-p$. Then expand $(x^2-bx+n)(x^2+bx+q)$ and look at the $x$ term to see why $n=q$.
$endgroup$
– Ethan MacBrough
Mar 26 at 21:40
$begingroup$
@EthanMacBrough I understand, my point though was that things like that should be in answer itself.
$endgroup$
– Sil
Mar 26 at 21:42
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think you should justify why $(x^2-bx+a)(x^2+bx+a)$ is the only possible form, and not generic $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$
$endgroup$
– Sil
Mar 26 at 21:27
$begingroup$
@Sil It's pretty easy with complex factorization. And it can also be done with a system of equations.
$endgroup$
– Eureka
Mar 26 at 21:30
1
$begingroup$
@Sil Try expanding out $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$ and look at the $x^3$ term to why $m=-p$. Then expand $(x^2-bx+n)(x^2+bx+q)$ and look at the $x$ term to see why $n=q$.
$endgroup$
– Ethan MacBrough
Mar 26 at 21:40
$begingroup$
@EthanMacBrough I understand, my point though was that things like that should be in answer itself.
$endgroup$
– Sil
Mar 26 at 21:42
$begingroup$
I think you should justify why $(x^2-bx+a)(x^2+bx+a)$ is the only possible form, and not generic $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$
$endgroup$
– Sil
Mar 26 at 21:27
$begingroup$
I think you should justify why $(x^2-bx+a)(x^2+bx+a)$ is the only possible form, and not generic $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$
$endgroup$
– Sil
Mar 26 at 21:27
$begingroup$
@Sil It's pretty easy with complex factorization. And it can also be done with a system of equations.
$endgroup$
– Eureka
Mar 26 at 21:30
$begingroup$
@Sil It's pretty easy with complex factorization. And it can also be done with a system of equations.
$endgroup$
– Eureka
Mar 26 at 21:30
1
1
$begingroup$
@Sil Try expanding out $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$ and look at the $x^3$ term to why $m=-p$. Then expand $(x^2-bx+n)(x^2+bx+q)$ and look at the $x$ term to see why $n=q$.
$endgroup$
– Ethan MacBrough
Mar 26 at 21:40
$begingroup$
@Sil Try expanding out $(x^2+mx+n)(x^2+px+q)$ and look at the $x^3$ term to why $m=-p$. Then expand $(x^2-bx+n)(x^2+bx+q)$ and look at the $x$ term to see why $n=q$.
$endgroup$
– Ethan MacBrough
Mar 26 at 21:40
$begingroup$
@EthanMacBrough I understand, my point though was that things like that should be in answer itself.
$endgroup$
– Sil
Mar 26 at 21:42
$begingroup$
@EthanMacBrough I understand, my point though was that things like that should be in answer itself.
$endgroup$
– Sil
Mar 26 at 21:42
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3163711%2firreducibility-of-a-simple-polynomial%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
If $a=2n^2$, then $x^4+a^2=x^4+(2n^2)^2=(x^2-2nx+2n^2)(x^2+2nx+2n^2)$. In other cases it seems to be irreducible.
$endgroup$
– Sil
Mar 26 at 21:08