LWC and complex parametersHow do I pass a SObject record from LWC to a custom Apex method to persist data?Apex Prepopulated Email bodyNeed help writing test Apex ClasseHow to pass a variable's value of child visualforce page to a variable in parent visualforce using jsI am getting Exception FATAL_ERROR|System. LimitException: Maximum stack depth reached: 12Not able to escape quote in visualforce page?fault string: No such parameter param defined for the operation, please check the WSDL for the servicewhat is wrong in this codeNeed to add field in apex class email template - not workingWhy is my Approval Process instance not creating NewWorkItems?Is there any help/ hint while attending trailhead challenge?
How did Arya get back her dagger from Sansa?
My ID is expired, can I fly to the Bahamas with my passport?
Mathematica "deeper" documentation
Power LED from 3.3V Power Pin without Resistor
Is it legal to define an unnamed struct?
Accidentally deleted the "/usr/share" folder
How can I close a gap between my fence and my neighbor's that's on his side of the property line?
CRT Oscilloscope - part of the plot is missing
Any examples of headwear for races with animal ears?
Attending a conference where my ex-supervisor and his collaborator are present, should I attend?
How to back up a running Linode server?
What was the state of the German rail system in 1944?
Does hiding behind 5-ft-wide cover give full cover?
What precisely is a link?
Is NMDA produced in the body?
Showing the sample mean is a sufficient statistics from an exponential distribution
If Melisandre foresaw another character closing blue eyes, why did she follow Stannis?
How do I tell my manager that his code review comment is wrong?
Why is Thanos so tough at the beginning of "Avengers: Endgame"?
Selecting a secure PIN for building access
How did Arya manage to disguise herself?
Is Cola "probably the best-known" Latin word in the world? If not, which might it be?
Why is the SNP putting so much emphasis on currency plans?
Is Jon Snow immune to dragonfire?
LWC and complex parameters
How do I pass a SObject record from LWC to a custom Apex method to persist data?Apex Prepopulated Email bodyNeed help writing test Apex ClasseHow to pass a variable's value of child visualforce page to a variable in parent visualforce using jsI am getting Exception FATAL_ERROR|System. LimitException: Maximum stack depth reached: 12Not able to escape quote in visualforce page?fault string: No such parameter param defined for the operation, please check the WSDL for the servicewhat is wrong in this codeNeed to add field in apex class email template - not workingWhy is my Approval Process instance not creating NewWorkItems?Is there any help/ hint while attending trailhead challenge?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I am trying to pass a list of objects to Apex from an LWC controller, and it looks like the Apex controller is getting the right sized list, but nothing is populated. Does anybody have any idea of what could be the problem?
Component JS code
refreshPeople()
let xxx = [];
xxx.push(name : 'aaa', email : 'bbb');
xxx.push(name : '111', email : '222');
getPeople(peopleInfo: xxx)
.then(result =>
console.log('#### HERE');
this.allPeople2 = result;
)
.catch(error =>
//Error Handling goes here
);
Apex:
@AuraEnabled(cacheable = true)
public static List<EmailPerson> getPeople(List<EmailPerson> peopleInfo)
try
System.debug('####' + peopleInfo);
return null;
catch (Exception e)
throw new AuraHandledException(e.getMessage() + ' ' + e.getStackTraceString());
public class EmailPerson
@AuraEnabled
public Id id;
@AuraEnabled
public String name;
@AuraEnabled
public String email;
@AuraEnabled
public Id recordTypeId;
@AuraEnabled
public String recordTypeName;
Note: I've tried @wire
, the behavior is the same. The list sees the two items, but none the values on the properties are assigned
<17:00:38:006 USER_DEBUG [20]|DEBUG|####(EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null], EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null])
apex lightning-web-components
add a comment |
I am trying to pass a list of objects to Apex from an LWC controller, and it looks like the Apex controller is getting the right sized list, but nothing is populated. Does anybody have any idea of what could be the problem?
Component JS code
refreshPeople()
let xxx = [];
xxx.push(name : 'aaa', email : 'bbb');
xxx.push(name : '111', email : '222');
getPeople(peopleInfo: xxx)
.then(result =>
console.log('#### HERE');
this.allPeople2 = result;
)
.catch(error =>
//Error Handling goes here
);
Apex:
@AuraEnabled(cacheable = true)
public static List<EmailPerson> getPeople(List<EmailPerson> peopleInfo)
try
System.debug('####' + peopleInfo);
return null;
catch (Exception e)
throw new AuraHandledException(e.getMessage() + ' ' + e.getStackTraceString());
public class EmailPerson
@AuraEnabled
public Id id;
@AuraEnabled
public String name;
@AuraEnabled
public String email;
@AuraEnabled
public Id recordTypeId;
@AuraEnabled
public String recordTypeName;
Note: I've tried @wire
, the behavior is the same. The list sees the two items, but none the values on the properties are assigned
<17:00:38:006 USER_DEBUG [20]|DEBUG|####(EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null], EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null])
apex lightning-web-components
add a comment |
I am trying to pass a list of objects to Apex from an LWC controller, and it looks like the Apex controller is getting the right sized list, but nothing is populated. Does anybody have any idea of what could be the problem?
Component JS code
refreshPeople()
let xxx = [];
xxx.push(name : 'aaa', email : 'bbb');
xxx.push(name : '111', email : '222');
getPeople(peopleInfo: xxx)
.then(result =>
console.log('#### HERE');
this.allPeople2 = result;
)
.catch(error =>
//Error Handling goes here
);
Apex:
@AuraEnabled(cacheable = true)
public static List<EmailPerson> getPeople(List<EmailPerson> peopleInfo)
try
System.debug('####' + peopleInfo);
return null;
catch (Exception e)
throw new AuraHandledException(e.getMessage() + ' ' + e.getStackTraceString());
public class EmailPerson
@AuraEnabled
public Id id;
@AuraEnabled
public String name;
@AuraEnabled
public String email;
@AuraEnabled
public Id recordTypeId;
@AuraEnabled
public String recordTypeName;
Note: I've tried @wire
, the behavior is the same. The list sees the two items, but none the values on the properties are assigned
<17:00:38:006 USER_DEBUG [20]|DEBUG|####(EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null], EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null])
apex lightning-web-components
I am trying to pass a list of objects to Apex from an LWC controller, and it looks like the Apex controller is getting the right sized list, but nothing is populated. Does anybody have any idea of what could be the problem?
Component JS code
refreshPeople()
let xxx = [];
xxx.push(name : 'aaa', email : 'bbb');
xxx.push(name : '111', email : '222');
getPeople(peopleInfo: xxx)
.then(result =>
console.log('#### HERE');
this.allPeople2 = result;
)
.catch(error =>
//Error Handling goes here
);
Apex:
@AuraEnabled(cacheable = true)
public static List<EmailPerson> getPeople(List<EmailPerson> peopleInfo)
try
System.debug('####' + peopleInfo);
return null;
catch (Exception e)
throw new AuraHandledException(e.getMessage() + ' ' + e.getStackTraceString());
public class EmailPerson
@AuraEnabled
public Id id;
@AuraEnabled
public String name;
@AuraEnabled
public String email;
@AuraEnabled
public Id recordTypeId;
@AuraEnabled
public String recordTypeName;
Note: I've tried @wire
, the behavior is the same. The list sees the two items, but none the values on the properties are assigned
<17:00:38:006 USER_DEBUG [20]|DEBUG|####(EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null], EmailPerson:[email=null, name=null])
apex lightning-web-components
apex lightning-web-components
asked Apr 9 at 0:05
Sebastian KesselSebastian Kessel
9,17362239
9,17362239
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
After 2 hours of struggling, and only 5 minutes after posting, here is the answer:
You have to add add get;set;
explicitly for this to work. Changing my inner class to the below fixed the problem.
public class EmailPerson
@AuraEnabled
public Id id get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String name get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String email get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public Id recordTypeId get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String recordTypeName get;set;
3
Its so weird that they expect this and just @auraEnabled is not sufficient .Will be curious for explanation from SFDC LWC Product team why do we need get and set on properties .
– Mohith Shrivastava
Apr 9 at 0:26
1
I’d love to hear it as well. That’s 2 hours of the clients time down the drain.
– Sebastian Kessel
Apr 9 at 0:27
This is exactly why I avoid wrappers and use theMap<String, Object>
datatypes.
– tsalb
Apr 9 at 2:41
FYI, I made an answer here about dealing with complex datatypes without wrappers.
– tsalb
Apr 9 at 5:49
I used the Map approach a lot with aura, but for things as simple as what I needed I should’ve been able to just pass an object. Making me be explicit with getter and setters is counter intuitive
– Sebastian Kessel
Apr 9 at 16:01
|
show 1 more comment
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "459"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f257074%2flwc-and-complex-parameters%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
After 2 hours of struggling, and only 5 minutes after posting, here is the answer:
You have to add add get;set;
explicitly for this to work. Changing my inner class to the below fixed the problem.
public class EmailPerson
@AuraEnabled
public Id id get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String name get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String email get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public Id recordTypeId get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String recordTypeName get;set;
3
Its so weird that they expect this and just @auraEnabled is not sufficient .Will be curious for explanation from SFDC LWC Product team why do we need get and set on properties .
– Mohith Shrivastava
Apr 9 at 0:26
1
I’d love to hear it as well. That’s 2 hours of the clients time down the drain.
– Sebastian Kessel
Apr 9 at 0:27
This is exactly why I avoid wrappers and use theMap<String, Object>
datatypes.
– tsalb
Apr 9 at 2:41
FYI, I made an answer here about dealing with complex datatypes without wrappers.
– tsalb
Apr 9 at 5:49
I used the Map approach a lot with aura, but for things as simple as what I needed I should’ve been able to just pass an object. Making me be explicit with getter and setters is counter intuitive
– Sebastian Kessel
Apr 9 at 16:01
|
show 1 more comment
After 2 hours of struggling, and only 5 minutes after posting, here is the answer:
You have to add add get;set;
explicitly for this to work. Changing my inner class to the below fixed the problem.
public class EmailPerson
@AuraEnabled
public Id id get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String name get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String email get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public Id recordTypeId get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String recordTypeName get;set;
3
Its so weird that they expect this and just @auraEnabled is not sufficient .Will be curious for explanation from SFDC LWC Product team why do we need get and set on properties .
– Mohith Shrivastava
Apr 9 at 0:26
1
I’d love to hear it as well. That’s 2 hours of the clients time down the drain.
– Sebastian Kessel
Apr 9 at 0:27
This is exactly why I avoid wrappers and use theMap<String, Object>
datatypes.
– tsalb
Apr 9 at 2:41
FYI, I made an answer here about dealing with complex datatypes without wrappers.
– tsalb
Apr 9 at 5:49
I used the Map approach a lot with aura, but for things as simple as what I needed I should’ve been able to just pass an object. Making me be explicit with getter and setters is counter intuitive
– Sebastian Kessel
Apr 9 at 16:01
|
show 1 more comment
After 2 hours of struggling, and only 5 minutes after posting, here is the answer:
You have to add add get;set;
explicitly for this to work. Changing my inner class to the below fixed the problem.
public class EmailPerson
@AuraEnabled
public Id id get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String name get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String email get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public Id recordTypeId get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String recordTypeName get;set;
After 2 hours of struggling, and only 5 minutes after posting, here is the answer:
You have to add add get;set;
explicitly for this to work. Changing my inner class to the below fixed the problem.
public class EmailPerson
@AuraEnabled
public Id id get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String name get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String email get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public Id recordTypeId get;set;
@AuraEnabled
public String recordTypeName get;set;
answered Apr 9 at 0:11
Sebastian KesselSebastian Kessel
9,17362239
9,17362239
3
Its so weird that they expect this and just @auraEnabled is not sufficient .Will be curious for explanation from SFDC LWC Product team why do we need get and set on properties .
– Mohith Shrivastava
Apr 9 at 0:26
1
I’d love to hear it as well. That’s 2 hours of the clients time down the drain.
– Sebastian Kessel
Apr 9 at 0:27
This is exactly why I avoid wrappers and use theMap<String, Object>
datatypes.
– tsalb
Apr 9 at 2:41
FYI, I made an answer here about dealing with complex datatypes without wrappers.
– tsalb
Apr 9 at 5:49
I used the Map approach a lot with aura, but for things as simple as what I needed I should’ve been able to just pass an object. Making me be explicit with getter and setters is counter intuitive
– Sebastian Kessel
Apr 9 at 16:01
|
show 1 more comment
3
Its so weird that they expect this and just @auraEnabled is not sufficient .Will be curious for explanation from SFDC LWC Product team why do we need get and set on properties .
– Mohith Shrivastava
Apr 9 at 0:26
1
I’d love to hear it as well. That’s 2 hours of the clients time down the drain.
– Sebastian Kessel
Apr 9 at 0:27
This is exactly why I avoid wrappers and use theMap<String, Object>
datatypes.
– tsalb
Apr 9 at 2:41
FYI, I made an answer here about dealing with complex datatypes without wrappers.
– tsalb
Apr 9 at 5:49
I used the Map approach a lot with aura, but for things as simple as what I needed I should’ve been able to just pass an object. Making me be explicit with getter and setters is counter intuitive
– Sebastian Kessel
Apr 9 at 16:01
3
3
Its so weird that they expect this and just @auraEnabled is not sufficient .Will be curious for explanation from SFDC LWC Product team why do we need get and set on properties .
– Mohith Shrivastava
Apr 9 at 0:26
Its so weird that they expect this and just @auraEnabled is not sufficient .Will be curious for explanation from SFDC LWC Product team why do we need get and set on properties .
– Mohith Shrivastava
Apr 9 at 0:26
1
1
I’d love to hear it as well. That’s 2 hours of the clients time down the drain.
– Sebastian Kessel
Apr 9 at 0:27
I’d love to hear it as well. That’s 2 hours of the clients time down the drain.
– Sebastian Kessel
Apr 9 at 0:27
This is exactly why I avoid wrappers and use the
Map<String, Object>
datatypes.– tsalb
Apr 9 at 2:41
This is exactly why I avoid wrappers and use the
Map<String, Object>
datatypes.– tsalb
Apr 9 at 2:41
FYI, I made an answer here about dealing with complex datatypes without wrappers.
– tsalb
Apr 9 at 5:49
FYI, I made an answer here about dealing with complex datatypes without wrappers.
– tsalb
Apr 9 at 5:49
I used the Map approach a lot with aura, but for things as simple as what I needed I should’ve been able to just pass an object. Making me be explicit with getter and setters is counter intuitive
– Sebastian Kessel
Apr 9 at 16:01
I used the Map approach a lot with aura, but for things as simple as what I needed I should’ve been able to just pass an object. Making me be explicit with getter and setters is counter intuitive
– Sebastian Kessel
Apr 9 at 16:01
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f257074%2flwc-and-complex-parameters%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown