How does a computer interpret real numbers? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowPermuting natural numbersWhat advanced math topics are recommended for computer science?Can a computer count to infinity?Representing Computations on Transcendental NumbersHow to find a subset of numbers such that its average is close to the average of the full set?What precisely differentiates Computer Science from Mathematics in theoretical context?Mathematics topics or fields that increase computer programming proficiency?How does maths consistency impacts on computer science?“Mathematical Physics”'s equivalent for Computer ScienceHow to generate evenly distributed random numbers from the tics of a Geiger Counter?
What is the purpose of the Evocation wizard's Potent Cantrip feature?
Only print output after finding pattern
What happens if you roll doubles 3 times then land on "Go to jail?"
Clustering points and summing up attributes per cluster in QGIS
How to make a variable always equal to the result of some calculations?
Why does standard notation not preserve intervals (visually)
Does the Brexit deal have to be agreed by both Houses?
Customer Requests (Sometimes) Drive Me Bonkers!
What is the difference between Sanyaas and Vairagya?
At which OSI layer a user-generated data resides?
How did people program for Consoles with multiple CPUs?
How do we know the LHC results are robust?
Title page not generated
Can I equip Skullclamp on a creature I am sacrificing?
If the heap is initialized for security, then why is the stack uninitialized?
Why do we use the plural of movies in this phrase "We went to the movies last night."?
Failed to fetch jessie backports repository
How to write the block matrix in LaTex?
Tiptoe or tiphoof? Adjusting words to better fit fantasy races
Help understanding this unsettling image of Titan, Epimetheus, and Saturn's rings?
Anatomically Correct Strange Women In Ponds Distributing Swords
Why do airplanes bank sharply to the right after air-to-air refueling?
What is the difference between "behavior" and "behaviour"?
Monthly twice production release for my software project
How does a computer interpret real numbers?
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowPermuting natural numbersWhat advanced math topics are recommended for computer science?Can a computer count to infinity?Representing Computations on Transcendental NumbersHow to find a subset of numbers such that its average is close to the average of the full set?What precisely differentiates Computer Science from Mathematics in theoretical context?Mathematics topics or fields that increase computer programming proficiency?How does maths consistency impacts on computer science?“Mathematical Physics”'s equivalent for Computer ScienceHow to generate evenly distributed random numbers from the tics of a Geiger Counter?
$begingroup$
I understand that the modern day digital computer works on the binary number system. I can also get, that the binary representation can be converted to rational numbers.
But I want to know how does the present day computational model interpret real numbers.
For eg:
On a daily basis we can see that a computer can plot graphs. But here, graphs may be continuous entities. What is the
mathematical basis, that transforms a discrete (or countable, at most)
like the binary system to something mathematically continuous like a
say, the graph of $f(x) = x$.
mathematical-programming mathematical-foundations
asked Mar 22 at 15:35
evil_potatoevil_potato
705189
$endgroup$
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
I understand that the modern day digital computer works on the binary number system. I can also get, that the binary representation can be converted to rational numbers.
But I want to know how does the present day computational model interpret real numbers.
For eg:
On a daily basis we can see that a computer can plot graphs. But here, graphs may be continuous entities. What is the
mathematical basis, that transforms a discrete (or countable, at most)
like the binary system to something mathematically continuous like a
say, the graph of $f(x) = x$.
mathematical-programming mathematical-foundations
asked Mar 22 at 15:35
evil_potatoevil_potato
705189
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of this Wikipedia article: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floating-point_arithmetic
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
Mar 22 at 15:38
1
$begingroup$
Aside from floating-point approximations, there are systems that deal with the reals as mathematical entities, most notably computer algebra systems and theorem provers. Representing a particular real number "directly" (for a certain interpretation of "directly") is restricted to the computable numbers.
$endgroup$
– Jeroen Mostert
Mar 22 at 15:54
1
$begingroup$
IEEE 754 is the answer.
$endgroup$
– Jasper
Mar 22 at 16:13
$begingroup$
I'm not sure exactly what you're trying to ask. It's OK that you didn't put a check mark beside either of the answers but since you didn't write the question clearly and you didn't get an answer that solved your problem and show that it solved your problem, I'm not sure what's you're trying to ask. Do you mean something like "How does a computer write a formal proof in ZF of a statement about all real numbers when some real numbers it cannot possibly store enough information to completely describe? If a computer is a physical device that follows simple laws, how can it be like the human brain
$endgroup$
– Timothy
Mar 23 at 0:29
$begingroup$
which can do creative thinking and start new mathematical research? The human brain can think of the statement that all statements provable in the formal system of Peano arithmetic are true and think of a proof of it but the formal system of Peano arithmetic itself cannot even describe that statement let alone prove it. Could the explanation be that although the human brain follows simple laws and when a human says that statement is obviously true, it is really just the result of the brain following those laws and making you say that sentence, that sentence actually represents a real statement
$endgroup$
– Timothy
Mar 23 at 0:36
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
I understand that the modern day digital computer works on the binary number system. I can also get, that the binary representation can be converted to rational numbers.
But I want to know how does the present day computational model interpret real numbers.
For eg:
On a daily basis we can see that a computer can plot graphs. But here, graphs may be continuous entities. What is the
mathematical basis, that transforms a discrete (or countable, at most)
like the binary system to something mathematically continuous like a
say, the graph of $f(x) = x$.
mathematical-programming mathematical-foundations
asked Mar 22 at 15:35
evil_potatoevil_potato
705189
$endgroup$
I understand that the modern day digital computer works on the binary number system. I can also get, that the binary representation can be converted to rational numbers.
But I want to know how does the present day computational model interpret real numbers.
For eg:
On a daily basis we can see that a computer can plot graphs. But here, graphs may be continuous entities. What is the
mathematical basis, that transforms a discrete (or countable, at most)
like the binary system to something mathematically continuous like a
say, the graph of $f(x) = x$.
mathematical-programming mathematical-foundations
mathematical-programming mathematical-foundations
asked Mar 22 at 15:35
evil_potatoevil_potato
705189
asked Mar 22 at 15:35
evil_potatoevil_potato
705189
asked Mar 22 at 15:35
evil_potatoevil_potato
705189
asked Mar 22 at 15:35
evil_potatoevil_potato
705189
asked Mar 22 at 15:35
evil_potatoevil_potato
705189
705189
4
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of this Wikipedia article: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floating-point_arithmetic
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
Mar 22 at 15:38
1
$begingroup$
Aside from floating-point approximations, there are systems that deal with the reals as mathematical entities, most notably computer algebra systems and theorem provers. Representing a particular real number "directly" (for a certain interpretation of "directly") is restricted to the computable numbers.
$endgroup$
– Jeroen Mostert
Mar 22 at 15:54
1
$begingroup$
IEEE 754 is the answer.
$endgroup$
– Jasper
Mar 22 at 16:13
$begingroup$
I'm not sure exactly what you're trying to ask. It's OK that you didn't put a check mark beside either of the answers but since you didn't write the question clearly and you didn't get an answer that solved your problem and show that it solved your problem, I'm not sure what's you're trying to ask. Do you mean something like "How does a computer write a formal proof in ZF of a statement about all real numbers when some real numbers it cannot possibly store enough information to completely describe? If a computer is a physical device that follows simple laws, how can it be like the human brain
$endgroup$
– Timothy
Mar 23 at 0:29
$begingroup$
which can do creative thinking and start new mathematical research? The human brain can think of the statement that all statements provable in the formal system of Peano arithmetic are true and think of a proof of it but the formal system of Peano arithmetic itself cannot even describe that statement let alone prove it. Could the explanation be that although the human brain follows simple laws and when a human says that statement is obviously true, it is really just the result of the brain following those laws and making you say that sentence, that sentence actually represents a real statement
$endgroup$
– Timothy
Mar 23 at 0:36
|
show 2 more comments
4
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of this Wikipedia article: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floating-point_arithmetic
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
Mar 22 at 15:38
1
$begingroup$
Aside from floating-point approximations, there are systems that deal with the reals as mathematical entities, most notably computer algebra systems and theorem provers. Representing a particular real number "directly" (for a certain interpretation of "directly") is restricted to the computable numbers.
$endgroup$
– Jeroen Mostert
Mar 22 at 15:54
1
$begingroup$
IEEE 754 is the answer.
$endgroup$
– Jasper
Mar 22 at 16:13
$begingroup$
I'm not sure exactly what you're trying to ask. It's OK that you didn't put a check mark beside either of the answers but since you didn't write the question clearly and you didn't get an answer that solved your problem and show that it solved your problem, I'm not sure what's you're trying to ask. Do you mean something like "How does a computer write a formal proof in ZF of a statement about all real numbers when some real numbers it cannot possibly store enough information to completely describe? If a computer is a physical device that follows simple laws, how can it be like the human brain
$endgroup$
– Timothy
Mar 23 at 0:29
$begingroup$
which can do creative thinking and start new mathematical research? The human brain can think of the statement that all statements provable in the formal system of Peano arithmetic are true and think of a proof of it but the formal system of Peano arithmetic itself cannot even describe that statement let alone prove it. Could the explanation be that although the human brain follows simple laws and when a human says that statement is obviously true, it is really just the result of the brain following those laws and making you say that sentence, that sentence actually represents a real statement
$endgroup$
– Timothy
Mar 23 at 0:36
4
4
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of this Wikipedia article: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floating-point_arithmetic
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
Mar 22 at 15:38
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of this Wikipedia article: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floating-point_arithmetic
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
Mar 22 at 15:38
1
1
$begingroup$
Aside from floating-point approximations, there are systems that deal with the reals as mathematical entities, most notably computer algebra systems and theorem provers. Representing a particular real number "directly" (for a certain interpretation of "directly") is restricted to the computable numbers.
$endgroup$
– Jeroen Mostert
Mar 22 at 15:54
$begingroup$
Aside from floating-point approximations, there are systems that deal with the reals as mathematical entities, most notably computer algebra systems and theorem provers. Representing a particular real number "directly" (for a certain interpretation of "directly") is restricted to the computable numbers.
$endgroup$
– Jeroen Mostert
Mar 22 at 15:54
1
1
$begingroup$
IEEE 754 is the answer.
$endgroup$
– Jasper
Mar 22 at 16:13
$begingroup$
IEEE 754 is the answer.
$endgroup$
– Jasper
Mar 22 at 16:13
$begingroup$
I'm not sure exactly what you're trying to ask. It's OK that you didn't put a check mark beside either of the answers but since you didn't write the question clearly and you didn't get an answer that solved your problem and show that it solved your problem, I'm not sure what's you're trying to ask. Do you mean something like "How does a computer write a formal proof in ZF of a statement about all real numbers when some real numbers it cannot possibly store enough information to completely describe? If a computer is a physical device that follows simple laws, how can it be like the human brain
$endgroup$
– Timothy
Mar 23 at 0:29
$begingroup$
I'm not sure exactly what you're trying to ask. It's OK that you didn't put a check mark beside either of the answers but since you didn't write the question clearly and you didn't get an answer that solved your problem and show that it solved your problem, I'm not sure what's you're trying to ask. Do you mean something like "How does a computer write a formal proof in ZF of a statement about all real numbers when some real numbers it cannot possibly store enough information to completely describe? If a computer is a physical device that follows simple laws, how can it be like the human brain
$endgroup$
– Timothy
Mar 23 at 0:29
$begingroup$
which can do creative thinking and start new mathematical research? The human brain can think of the statement that all statements provable in the formal system of Peano arithmetic are true and think of a proof of it but the formal system of Peano arithmetic itself cannot even describe that statement let alone prove it. Could the explanation be that although the human brain follows simple laws and when a human says that statement is obviously true, it is really just the result of the brain following those laws and making you say that sentence, that sentence actually represents a real statement
$endgroup$
– Timothy
Mar 23 at 0:36
$begingroup$
which can do creative thinking and start new mathematical research? The human brain can think of the statement that all statements provable in the formal system of Peano arithmetic are true and think of a proof of it but the formal system of Peano arithmetic itself cannot even describe that statement let alone prove it. Could the explanation be that although the human brain follows simple laws and when a human says that statement is obviously true, it is really just the result of the brain following those laws and making you say that sentence, that sentence actually represents a real statement
$endgroup$
– Timothy
Mar 23 at 0:36
|
show 2 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
They represent continuous quantities with discrete approximations. Mostly, this is done with floating point, which is analogous to scientific notation. Essentially, they work with something like $1.xyztimes 10^k$, with some appropriate number of decimal places (and in binary, rather than decimal).
It's also possible to work with some irrational numbers directly. For example, you could create yourself an object called "$sqrt2$" without particularly worrying about what it is, except that it obeys the usual arithmetic rules and that $(sqrt2)^2=2$. So then you could compute $$(sqrt2-1)(sqrt2+1) = (sqrt2)^2 + sqrt2 - sqrt2 - 1 = 2 - 1 = 1$$
exactly, as an algebraic fact that's not susceptible to rounding errors.
Note that, if you're plotting a graph on screen, regardless of how far you zoom in, you're plotting it as discrete pixels so using an appropriate number of significant figures basically gets you everything you need.
answered Mar 22 at 16:03
David RicherbyDavid Richerby
69.2k15106195
$endgroup$
7
$begingroup$
+1. For folks interested in more information about your second paragraph, some good search terms are symbolic computation and computer algebra.
$endgroup$
– ruakh
Mar 22 at 22:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The real numbers are uncountable. The set of real numbers that can be represented in any way is countable. Therefore, almost all real numbers cannot be represented by a computer at all.
The most common method is to store floating point numbers, which are reasonably precise approximations to real numbers that are not excessively large or small.
answered Mar 22 at 18:44
gnasher729gnasher729
11.4k1217
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
In fact, infinitely many real numbers can't be represented. It's just a slightly smaller infinity than the infinite number of all real numbers. :)
$endgroup$
– Graham
Mar 22 at 23:50
6
$begingroup$
@Graham: It's actually the same infinite cardinality. gnasher729 is using "almost all" in a precise sense; see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_all for details.
$endgroup$
– ruakh
Mar 23 at 0:11
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "419"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f105923%2fhow-does-a-computer-interpret-real-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
They represent continuous quantities with discrete approximations. Mostly, this is done with floating point, which is analogous to scientific notation. Essentially, they work with something like $1.xyztimes 10^k$, with some appropriate number of decimal places (and in binary, rather than decimal).
It's also possible to work with some irrational numbers directly. For example, you could create yourself an object called "$sqrt2$" without particularly worrying about what it is, except that it obeys the usual arithmetic rules and that $(sqrt2)^2=2$. So then you could compute $$(sqrt2-1)(sqrt2+1) = (sqrt2)^2 + sqrt2 - sqrt2 - 1 = 2 - 1 = 1$$
exactly, as an algebraic fact that's not susceptible to rounding errors.
Note that, if you're plotting a graph on screen, regardless of how far you zoom in, you're plotting it as discrete pixels so using an appropriate number of significant figures basically gets you everything you need.
answered Mar 22 at 16:03
David RicherbyDavid Richerby
69.2k15106195
$endgroup$
7
$begingroup$
+1. For folks interested in more information about your second paragraph, some good search terms are symbolic computation and computer algebra.
$endgroup$
– ruakh
Mar 22 at 22:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
They represent continuous quantities with discrete approximations. Mostly, this is done with floating point, which is analogous to scientific notation. Essentially, they work with something like $1.xyztimes 10^k$, with some appropriate number of decimal places (and in binary, rather than decimal).
It's also possible to work with some irrational numbers directly. For example, you could create yourself an object called "$sqrt2$" without particularly worrying about what it is, except that it obeys the usual arithmetic rules and that $(sqrt2)^2=2$. So then you could compute $$(sqrt2-1)(sqrt2+1) = (sqrt2)^2 + sqrt2 - sqrt2 - 1 = 2 - 1 = 1$$
exactly, as an algebraic fact that's not susceptible to rounding errors.
Note that, if you're plotting a graph on screen, regardless of how far you zoom in, you're plotting it as discrete pixels so using an appropriate number of significant figures basically gets you everything you need.
answered Mar 22 at 16:03
David RicherbyDavid Richerby
69.2k15106195
$endgroup$
7
$begingroup$
+1. For folks interested in more information about your second paragraph, some good search terms are symbolic computation and computer algebra.
$endgroup$
– ruakh
Mar 22 at 22:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
They represent continuous quantities with discrete approximations. Mostly, this is done with floating point, which is analogous to scientific notation. Essentially, they work with something like $1.xyztimes 10^k$, with some appropriate number of decimal places (and in binary, rather than decimal).
It's also possible to work with some irrational numbers directly. For example, you could create yourself an object called "$sqrt2$" without particularly worrying about what it is, except that it obeys the usual arithmetic rules and that $(sqrt2)^2=2$. So then you could compute $$(sqrt2-1)(sqrt2+1) = (sqrt2)^2 + sqrt2 - sqrt2 - 1 = 2 - 1 = 1$$
exactly, as an algebraic fact that's not susceptible to rounding errors.
Note that, if you're plotting a graph on screen, regardless of how far you zoom in, you're plotting it as discrete pixels so using an appropriate number of significant figures basically gets you everything you need.
answered Mar 22 at 16:03
David RicherbyDavid Richerby
69.2k15106195
$endgroup$
They represent continuous quantities with discrete approximations. Mostly, this is done with floating point, which is analogous to scientific notation. Essentially, they work with something like $1.xyztimes 10^k$, with some appropriate number of decimal places (and in binary, rather than decimal).
It's also possible to work with some irrational numbers directly. For example, you could create yourself an object called "$sqrt2$" without particularly worrying about what it is, except that it obeys the usual arithmetic rules and that $(sqrt2)^2=2$. So then you could compute $$(sqrt2-1)(sqrt2+1) = (sqrt2)^2 + sqrt2 - sqrt2 - 1 = 2 - 1 = 1$$
exactly, as an algebraic fact that's not susceptible to rounding errors.
Note that, if you're plotting a graph on screen, regardless of how far you zoom in, you're plotting it as discrete pixels so using an appropriate number of significant figures basically gets you everything you need.
answered Mar 22 at 16:03
David RicherbyDavid Richerby
69.2k15106195
answered Mar 22 at 16:03
David RicherbyDavid Richerby
69.2k15106195
answered Mar 22 at 16:03
David RicherbyDavid Richerby
69.2k15106195
answered Mar 22 at 16:03
David RicherbyDavid Richerby
69.2k15106195
69.2k15106195
7
$begingroup$
+1. For folks interested in more information about your second paragraph, some good search terms are symbolic computation and computer algebra.
$endgroup$
– ruakh
Mar 22 at 22:57
add a comment |
7
$begingroup$
+1. For folks interested in more information about your second paragraph, some good search terms are symbolic computation and computer algebra.
$endgroup$
– ruakh
Mar 22 at 22:57
7
7
$begingroup$
+1. For folks interested in more information about your second paragraph, some good search terms are symbolic computation and computer algebra.
$endgroup$
– ruakh
Mar 22 at 22:57
$begingroup$
+1. For folks interested in more information about your second paragraph, some good search terms are symbolic computation and computer algebra.
$endgroup$
– ruakh
Mar 22 at 22:57
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The real numbers are uncountable. The set of real numbers that can be represented in any way is countable. Therefore, almost all real numbers cannot be represented by a computer at all.
The most common method is to store floating point numbers, which are reasonably precise approximations to real numbers that are not excessively large or small.
answered Mar 22 at 18:44
gnasher729gnasher729
11.4k1217
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
In fact, infinitely many real numbers can't be represented. It's just a slightly smaller infinity than the infinite number of all real numbers. :)
$endgroup$
– Graham
Mar 22 at 23:50
6
$begingroup$
@Graham: It's actually the same infinite cardinality. gnasher729 is using "almost all" in a precise sense; see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_all for details.
$endgroup$
– ruakh
Mar 23 at 0:11
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The real numbers are uncountable. The set of real numbers that can be represented in any way is countable. Therefore, almost all real numbers cannot be represented by a computer at all.
The most common method is to store floating point numbers, which are reasonably precise approximations to real numbers that are not excessively large or small.
answered Mar 22 at 18:44
gnasher729gnasher729
11.4k1217
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
In fact, infinitely many real numbers can't be represented. It's just a slightly smaller infinity than the infinite number of all real numbers. :)
$endgroup$
– Graham
Mar 22 at 23:50
6
$begingroup$
@Graham: It's actually the same infinite cardinality. gnasher729 is using "almost all" in a precise sense; see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_all for details.
$endgroup$
– ruakh
Mar 23 at 0:11
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The real numbers are uncountable. The set of real numbers that can be represented in any way is countable. Therefore, almost all real numbers cannot be represented by a computer at all.
The most common method is to store floating point numbers, which are reasonably precise approximations to real numbers that are not excessively large or small.
answered Mar 22 at 18:44
gnasher729gnasher729
11.4k1217
$endgroup$
The real numbers are uncountable. The set of real numbers that can be represented in any way is countable. Therefore, almost all real numbers cannot be represented by a computer at all.
The most common method is to store floating point numbers, which are reasonably precise approximations to real numbers that are not excessively large or small.
answered Mar 22 at 18:44
gnasher729gnasher729
11.4k1217
answered Mar 22 at 18:44
gnasher729gnasher729
11.4k1217
answered Mar 22 at 18:44
gnasher729gnasher729
11.4k1217
answered Mar 22 at 18:44
gnasher729gnasher729
11.4k1217
11.4k1217
1
$begingroup$
In fact, infinitely many real numbers can't be represented. It's just a slightly smaller infinity than the infinite number of all real numbers. :)
$endgroup$
– Graham
Mar 22 at 23:50
6
$begingroup$
@Graham: It's actually the same infinite cardinality. gnasher729 is using "almost all" in a precise sense; see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_all for details.
$endgroup$
– ruakh
Mar 23 at 0:11
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
In fact, infinitely many real numbers can't be represented. It's just a slightly smaller infinity than the infinite number of all real numbers. :)
$endgroup$
– Graham
Mar 22 at 23:50
6
$begingroup$
@Graham: It's actually the same infinite cardinality. gnasher729 is using "almost all" in a precise sense; see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_all for details.
$endgroup$
– ruakh
Mar 23 at 0:11
1
1
$begingroup$
In fact, infinitely many real numbers can't be represented. It's just a slightly smaller infinity than the infinite number of all real numbers. :)
$endgroup$
– Graham
Mar 22 at 23:50
$begingroup$
In fact, infinitely many real numbers can't be represented. It's just a slightly smaller infinity than the infinite number of all real numbers. :)
$endgroup$
– Graham
Mar 22 at 23:50
6
6
$begingroup$
@Graham: It's actually the same infinite cardinality. gnasher729 is using "almost all" in a precise sense; see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_all for details.
$endgroup$
– ruakh
Mar 23 at 0:11
$begingroup$
@Graham: It's actually the same infinite cardinality. gnasher729 is using "almost all" in a precise sense; see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_all for details.
$endgroup$
– ruakh
Mar 23 at 0:11
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Computer Science Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f105923%2fhow-does-a-computer-interpret-real-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of this Wikipedia article: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floating-point_arithmetic
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
Mar 22 at 15:38
1
$begingroup$
Aside from floating-point approximations, there are systems that deal with the reals as mathematical entities, most notably computer algebra systems and theorem provers. Representing a particular real number "directly" (for a certain interpretation of "directly") is restricted to the computable numbers.
$endgroup$
– Jeroen Mostert
Mar 22 at 15:54
1
$begingroup$
IEEE 754 is the answer.
$endgroup$
– Jasper
Mar 22 at 16:13
$begingroup$
I'm not sure exactly what you're trying to ask. It's OK that you didn't put a check mark beside either of the answers but since you didn't write the question clearly and you didn't get an answer that solved your problem and show that it solved your problem, I'm not sure what's you're trying to ask. Do you mean something like "How does a computer write a formal proof in ZF of a statement about all real numbers when some real numbers it cannot possibly store enough information to completely describe? If a computer is a physical device that follows simple laws, how can it be like the human brain
$endgroup$
– Timothy
Mar 23 at 0:29
$begingroup$
which can do creative thinking and start new mathematical research? The human brain can think of the statement that all statements provable in the formal system of Peano arithmetic are true and think of a proof of it but the formal system of Peano arithmetic itself cannot even describe that statement let alone prove it. Could the explanation be that although the human brain follows simple laws and when a human says that statement is obviously true, it is really just the result of the brain following those laws and making you say that sentence, that sentence actually represents a real statement
$endgroup$
– Timothy
Mar 23 at 0:36