Pauli exclusion principlePauli exclusion principle and resonanceIs there an energy cost associated with flipping the spin of an electron?Pauli's Exclusion PrincipleCan two electron occupy the same spatial spot in a statistical way?Is there any connection between “static correlation” and the Born-Oppenheimer approximation?MO Theory: Why do hydrogen and lithium bond, but hydrogen and helium don't?How to derive Pauli Exclusion Principle without assuming anti-symmetry?Total irreducible representation of a quantum system - Slater determinant?How do restricted open shell calculations mathematically proceed in the context of the self consistent field iterations?Relationship between the 2nd theorem of Hohenberg and Kohn and the Variational Principle
Graph Theory - degree of vertices in a simple graph
Is there a hypothetical scenario that would make Earth uninhabitable for humans, but not for (the majority of) other animals?
What is the Japanese sound word for the clinking of money?
How to explain that I do not want to visit a country due to personal safety concern?
Is it insecure to send a password in a `curl` command?
Is a party consisting of only a bard, a cleric, and a warlock functional long-term?
Shortcut for setting origin to vertex
How to simplify this time periods definition interface?
What do you call the act of removing a part of a word and replacing it with an apostrophe
Can I use USB data pins as power source
Professor being mistaken for a grad student
Life insurance that covers only simultaneous/dual deaths
What is the adequate fee for a reveal operation?
Are Roman Catholic priests ever addressed as pastor
Are all passive ability checks floors for active ability checks?
Can a one-dimensional blade cut everything ? (chainsaw) (Sword)
How to make healing in an exploration game interesting
How could a scammer know the apps on my phone / iTunes account?
Is honey really a supersaturated solution? Does heating to un-crystalize redissolve it or melt it?
Have the tides ever turned twice on any open problem?
What did Alexander Pope mean by "Expletives their feeble Aid do join"?
Why does energy conservation give me the wrong answer in this inelastic collision problem?
Bacteria contamination inside a thermos bottle
What are substitutions for coconut in curry?
Pauli exclusion principle
Pauli exclusion principle and resonanceIs there an energy cost associated with flipping the spin of an electron?Pauli's Exclusion PrincipleCan two electron occupy the same spatial spot in a statistical way?Is there any connection between “static correlation” and the Born-Oppenheimer approximation?MO Theory: Why do hydrogen and lithium bond, but hydrogen and helium don't?How to derive Pauli Exclusion Principle without assuming anti-symmetry?Total irreducible representation of a quantum system - Slater determinant?How do restricted open shell calculations mathematically proceed in the context of the self consistent field iterations?Relationship between the 2nd theorem of Hohenberg and Kohn and the Variational Principle
$begingroup$
Pauli exclusion principle states that 'No two electron can exist in same state'or 'No two electron can have same set of quantum numbers'.
But in reality there is no state of electron. The state is of whole system which is composed of Many electron.It is our approximation that each electron is described by a single wave-function which we call Spin orbital. So what does that statement even mean in reality?
Quantum numbers is only exact for hydrogen atom. What does quantum number even mean for a electron in a many electron system.
physical-chemistry quantum-chemistry molecular-orbital-theory theoretical-chemistry
asked 9 hours ago
LOKHANDE RUGWEDLOKHANDE RUGWED
262
New contributor
LOKHANDE RUGWED is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Pauli exclusion principle states that 'No two electron can exist in same state'or 'No two electron can have same set of quantum numbers'.
But in reality there is no state of electron. The state is of whole system which is composed of Many electron.It is our approximation that each electron is described by a single wave-function which we call Spin orbital. So what does that statement even mean in reality?
Quantum numbers is only exact for hydrogen atom. What does quantum number even mean for a electron in a many electron system.
physical-chemistry quantum-chemistry molecular-orbital-theory theoretical-chemistry
asked 9 hours ago
LOKHANDE RUGWEDLOKHANDE RUGWED
262
New contributor
LOKHANDE RUGWED is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Pauli exclusion principle states that 'No two electron can exist in same state'or 'No two electron can have same set of quantum numbers'.
But in reality there is no state of electron. The state is of whole system which is composed of Many electron.It is our approximation that each electron is described by a single wave-function which we call Spin orbital. So what does that statement even mean in reality?
Quantum numbers is only exact for hydrogen atom. What does quantum number even mean for a electron in a many electron system.
physical-chemistry quantum-chemistry molecular-orbital-theory theoretical-chemistry
asked 9 hours ago
LOKHANDE RUGWEDLOKHANDE RUGWED
262
New contributor
LOKHANDE RUGWED is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
$endgroup$
Pauli exclusion principle states that 'No two electron can exist in same state'or 'No two electron can have same set of quantum numbers'.
But in reality there is no state of electron. The state is of whole system which is composed of Many electron.It is our approximation that each electron is described by a single wave-function which we call Spin orbital. So what does that statement even mean in reality?
Quantum numbers is only exact for hydrogen atom. What does quantum number even mean for a electron in a many electron system.
physical-chemistry quantum-chemistry molecular-orbital-theory theoretical-chemistry
physical-chemistry quantum-chemistry molecular-orbital-theory theoretical-chemistry
asked 9 hours ago
LOKHANDE RUGWEDLOKHANDE RUGWED
262
New contributor
LOKHANDE RUGWED is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 9 hours ago
LOKHANDE RUGWEDLOKHANDE RUGWED
262
New contributor
LOKHANDE RUGWED is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 9 hours ago
LOKHANDE RUGWEDLOKHANDE RUGWED
262
New contributor
LOKHANDE RUGWED is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 9 hours ago
LOKHANDE RUGWEDLOKHANDE RUGWED
262
asked 9 hours ago
LOKHANDE RUGWEDLOKHANDE RUGWED
262
262
New contributor
LOKHANDE RUGWED is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
LOKHANDE RUGWED is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
LOKHANDE RUGWED is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Wikipedia has the correct definition:
A more rigorous statement is that with respect to exchange of two identical particles the total wave function is antisymmetric for fermions, and symmetric for bosons. This means that if the space and spin co-ordinates of two identical particles are interchanged, then the wave function changes its sign for fermions and does not change for bosons.
The textbook shorthand you quote, 'No two electron can have same set of quantum numbers', only makes sense when you are using the one-electron approximation. As you move beyond that approximation, you also have to move beyond this shorthand definition.
answered 5 hours ago
Karsten TheisKarsten Theis
2,843434
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "431"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
LOKHANDE RUGWED is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f111062%2fpauli-exclusion-principle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Wikipedia has the correct definition:
A more rigorous statement is that with respect to exchange of two identical particles the total wave function is antisymmetric for fermions, and symmetric for bosons. This means that if the space and spin co-ordinates of two identical particles are interchanged, then the wave function changes its sign for fermions and does not change for bosons.
The textbook shorthand you quote, 'No two electron can have same set of quantum numbers', only makes sense when you are using the one-electron approximation. As you move beyond that approximation, you also have to move beyond this shorthand definition.
answered 5 hours ago
Karsten TheisKarsten Theis
2,843434
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Wikipedia has the correct definition:
A more rigorous statement is that with respect to exchange of two identical particles the total wave function is antisymmetric for fermions, and symmetric for bosons. This means that if the space and spin co-ordinates of two identical particles are interchanged, then the wave function changes its sign for fermions and does not change for bosons.
The textbook shorthand you quote, 'No two electron can have same set of quantum numbers', only makes sense when you are using the one-electron approximation. As you move beyond that approximation, you also have to move beyond this shorthand definition.
answered 5 hours ago
Karsten TheisKarsten Theis
2,843434
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Wikipedia has the correct definition:
A more rigorous statement is that with respect to exchange of two identical particles the total wave function is antisymmetric for fermions, and symmetric for bosons. This means that if the space and spin co-ordinates of two identical particles are interchanged, then the wave function changes its sign for fermions and does not change for bosons.
The textbook shorthand you quote, 'No two electron can have same set of quantum numbers', only makes sense when you are using the one-electron approximation. As you move beyond that approximation, you also have to move beyond this shorthand definition.
answered 5 hours ago
Karsten TheisKarsten Theis
2,843434
$endgroup$
Wikipedia has the correct definition:
A more rigorous statement is that with respect to exchange of two identical particles the total wave function is antisymmetric for fermions, and symmetric for bosons. This means that if the space and spin co-ordinates of two identical particles are interchanged, then the wave function changes its sign for fermions and does not change for bosons.
The textbook shorthand you quote, 'No two electron can have same set of quantum numbers', only makes sense when you are using the one-electron approximation. As you move beyond that approximation, you also have to move beyond this shorthand definition.
answered 5 hours ago
Karsten TheisKarsten Theis
2,843434
answered 5 hours ago
Karsten TheisKarsten Theis
2,843434
answered 5 hours ago
Karsten TheisKarsten Theis
2,843434
answered 5 hours ago
Karsten TheisKarsten Theis
2,843434
2,843434
add a comment |
add a comment |
LOKHANDE RUGWED is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
LOKHANDE RUGWED is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
LOKHANDE RUGWED is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
LOKHANDE RUGWED is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f111062%2fpauli-exclusion-principle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
