How could a female member of a species produce eggs unto death?Social implications of intelligent species that practices external fertilizationHow could a human-descended race appear to be all-female?Anatomically Correct Bio-fabricatorCould humanesque creatures ever be eusocial?Egg pouch: Chest or Abdomen?Plausibility of seahorse-like marsupials where the male carries offspring?How to Extend Female Fertility Period without Altering Current Pubescent Timing?2-Dimensional sexual polymorphism - What chromosome system would allow this kind of reproduction?Is the evolution of my aliens realistic?How can you safely extend childbearing age if menopause isn't a factor?

What is the Japanese sound word for the clinking of money?

Why one should not leave fingerprints on bulbs and plugs?

Python if-else code style for reduced code for rounding floats

Credit cards used everywhere in Singapore or Malaysia?

Employee lack of ownership

Meme-controlled people

Is it true that good novels will automatically sell themselves on Amazon (and so on) and there is no need for one to waste time promoting?

Is it insecure to send a password in a `curl` command?

How do I hide Chekhov's Gun?

If I can solve Sudoku, can I solve the Travelling Salesman Problem (TSP)? If so, how?

Why no Iridium-level flares from other satellites?

Problem with FindRoot

How to terminate ping <dest> &

Brexit - No Deal Rejection

How to deal with taxi scam when on vacation?

Can a one-dimensional blade cut everything ? (chainsaw) (Sword)

Pauli exclusion principle

Fastest way to pop N items from a large dict

How difficult is it to simply disable/disengage the MCAS on Boeing 737 Max 8 & 9 Aircraft?

how to draw this figure in latex

How to use deus ex machina safely?

How to write cleanly even if my character uses expletive language?

What is the significance behind "40 days" that often appears in the Bible?

Do the common programs (for example: "ls", "cat") in Linux and BSD come from the same source code?



How could a female member of a species produce eggs unto death?


Social implications of intelligent species that practices external fertilizationHow could a human-descended race appear to be all-female?Anatomically Correct Bio-fabricatorCould humanesque creatures ever be eusocial?Egg pouch: Chest or Abdomen?Plausibility of seahorse-like marsupials where the male carries offspring?How to Extend Female Fertility Period without Altering Current Pubescent Timing?2-Dimensional sexual polymorphism - What chromosome system would allow this kind of reproduction?Is the evolution of my aliens realistic?How can you safely extend childbearing age if menopause isn't a factor?













15












$begingroup$


As far as I am aware, female mammals cannot produce eggs (as in ova) after a certain age/maturation.



How could the female produce eggs for an unlimited amount of time, resulting in a 'queen' mammal similar to queen bees?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    "unlimited amount of time" as in "forever", or as in "when she dies after her species' normal lifespan?
    $endgroup$
    – RonJohn
    Mar 13 at 13:47






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Two words: Short Lifespan. Even queen bees don't produce eggs forever - they grow old and die like everything else. If the average lifespan of a species is short enough, they won't run out of eggs. Simple as that.
    $endgroup$
    – Darrel Hoffman
    Mar 13 at 13:56






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    The "after a certain age" is in the fetal state. Humans are born with all the eggs they will ever have. I don't have the spoons to look it up for all mammals, but it's going to be the same or similar.
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    Mar 13 at 14:46










  • $begingroup$
    Lots of animals die after first spawn -- salmon, squid, ... . You want something which produces multiple spawns and doesn't "age out" ?
    $endgroup$
    – Carl Witthoft
    Mar 13 at 15:21






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Naked mole rats have a "queen". You probably want to read up on them, they're fascinating.
    $endgroup$
    – RemcoGerlich
    2 days ago















15












$begingroup$


As far as I am aware, female mammals cannot produce eggs (as in ova) after a certain age/maturation.



How could the female produce eggs for an unlimited amount of time, resulting in a 'queen' mammal similar to queen bees?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    "unlimited amount of time" as in "forever", or as in "when she dies after her species' normal lifespan?
    $endgroup$
    – RonJohn
    Mar 13 at 13:47






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Two words: Short Lifespan. Even queen bees don't produce eggs forever - they grow old and die like everything else. If the average lifespan of a species is short enough, they won't run out of eggs. Simple as that.
    $endgroup$
    – Darrel Hoffman
    Mar 13 at 13:56






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    The "after a certain age" is in the fetal state. Humans are born with all the eggs they will ever have. I don't have the spoons to look it up for all mammals, but it's going to be the same or similar.
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    Mar 13 at 14:46










  • $begingroup$
    Lots of animals die after first spawn -- salmon, squid, ... . You want something which produces multiple spawns and doesn't "age out" ?
    $endgroup$
    – Carl Witthoft
    Mar 13 at 15:21






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Naked mole rats have a "queen". You probably want to read up on them, they're fascinating.
    $endgroup$
    – RemcoGerlich
    2 days ago













15












15








15


3



$begingroup$


As far as I am aware, female mammals cannot produce eggs (as in ova) after a certain age/maturation.



How could the female produce eggs for an unlimited amount of time, resulting in a 'queen' mammal similar to queen bees?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




As far as I am aware, female mammals cannot produce eggs (as in ova) after a certain age/maturation.



How could the female produce eggs for an unlimited amount of time, resulting in a 'queen' mammal similar to queen bees?







biology reproduction mammals female






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 13 at 8:49







A Lambent Eye

















asked Mar 13 at 8:29









A Lambent EyeA Lambent Eye

1,479629




1,479629







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    "unlimited amount of time" as in "forever", or as in "when she dies after her species' normal lifespan?
    $endgroup$
    – RonJohn
    Mar 13 at 13:47






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Two words: Short Lifespan. Even queen bees don't produce eggs forever - they grow old and die like everything else. If the average lifespan of a species is short enough, they won't run out of eggs. Simple as that.
    $endgroup$
    – Darrel Hoffman
    Mar 13 at 13:56






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    The "after a certain age" is in the fetal state. Humans are born with all the eggs they will ever have. I don't have the spoons to look it up for all mammals, but it's going to be the same or similar.
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    Mar 13 at 14:46










  • $begingroup$
    Lots of animals die after first spawn -- salmon, squid, ... . You want something which produces multiple spawns and doesn't "age out" ?
    $endgroup$
    – Carl Witthoft
    Mar 13 at 15:21






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Naked mole rats have a "queen". You probably want to read up on them, they're fascinating.
    $endgroup$
    – RemcoGerlich
    2 days ago












  • 5




    $begingroup$
    "unlimited amount of time" as in "forever", or as in "when she dies after her species' normal lifespan?
    $endgroup$
    – RonJohn
    Mar 13 at 13:47






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Two words: Short Lifespan. Even queen bees don't produce eggs forever - they grow old and die like everything else. If the average lifespan of a species is short enough, they won't run out of eggs. Simple as that.
    $endgroup$
    – Darrel Hoffman
    Mar 13 at 13:56






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    The "after a certain age" is in the fetal state. Humans are born with all the eggs they will ever have. I don't have the spoons to look it up for all mammals, but it's going to be the same or similar.
    $endgroup$
    – Cyn
    Mar 13 at 14:46










  • $begingroup$
    Lots of animals die after first spawn -- salmon, squid, ... . You want something which produces multiple spawns and doesn't "age out" ?
    $endgroup$
    – Carl Witthoft
    Mar 13 at 15:21






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Naked mole rats have a "queen". You probably want to read up on them, they're fascinating.
    $endgroup$
    – RemcoGerlich
    2 days ago







5




5




$begingroup$
"unlimited amount of time" as in "forever", or as in "when she dies after her species' normal lifespan?
$endgroup$
– RonJohn
Mar 13 at 13:47




$begingroup$
"unlimited amount of time" as in "forever", or as in "when she dies after her species' normal lifespan?
$endgroup$
– RonJohn
Mar 13 at 13:47




6




6




$begingroup$
Two words: Short Lifespan. Even queen bees don't produce eggs forever - they grow old and die like everything else. If the average lifespan of a species is short enough, they won't run out of eggs. Simple as that.
$endgroup$
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 13 at 13:56




$begingroup$
Two words: Short Lifespan. Even queen bees don't produce eggs forever - they grow old and die like everything else. If the average lifespan of a species is short enough, they won't run out of eggs. Simple as that.
$endgroup$
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 13 at 13:56




3




3




$begingroup$
The "after a certain age" is in the fetal state. Humans are born with all the eggs they will ever have. I don't have the spoons to look it up for all mammals, but it's going to be the same or similar.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
Mar 13 at 14:46




$begingroup$
The "after a certain age" is in the fetal state. Humans are born with all the eggs they will ever have. I don't have the spoons to look it up for all mammals, but it's going to be the same or similar.
$endgroup$
– Cyn
Mar 13 at 14:46












$begingroup$
Lots of animals die after first spawn -- salmon, squid, ... . You want something which produces multiple spawns and doesn't "age out" ?
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
Mar 13 at 15:21




$begingroup$
Lots of animals die after first spawn -- salmon, squid, ... . You want something which produces multiple spawns and doesn't "age out" ?
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
Mar 13 at 15:21




1




1




$begingroup$
Naked mole rats have a "queen". You probably want to read up on them, they're fascinating.
$endgroup$
– RemcoGerlich
2 days ago




$begingroup$
Naked mole rats have a "queen". You probably want to read up on them, they're fascinating.
$endgroup$
– RemcoGerlich
2 days ago










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















61












$begingroup$

The concept of a menopause is actually unusual, it's known to exist in the wild in 5 species, Humans, Orcas, Belugas, Narwhals, Short Finned Pilot Whales. While some other species exhibit menopause in captivity, others are definitely known not to e.g. cats and dogs.



In all other species the females are believed to remain fertile for their entire lives.



The only queen mammal I'm aware of is the naked mole rat.




The relationships between the queen and the breeding males may last for many years; other females are temporarily sterile. Queens live from 13 to 18 years, and are extremely hostile to other females behaving like queens, or producing hormones for becoming queens. When the queen dies, another female takes her place, sometimes after a violent struggle with her competitors. Once established, the new queen's body expands the space between the vertebrae in her backbone to become longer and ready to bear pups.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 6




    $begingroup$
    This answer actually surprised me quite a bit. I wasn't aware that menopause was so rare. So, in a sense, for other mammals what blocks older females from procreating isn't fertility, but the actual ability for the body to sustain the pregnancy?
    $endgroup$
    – T. Sar
    Mar 13 at 12:19






  • 11




    $begingroup$
    @T.Sar, there's a theory that basically says something eats them before they become infertile. Note that all known species are at or close to the top of the food chain and highly social, so an individual no longer capable of surviving alone, or increasingly vulnerable due to age isn't necessarily going to be left out to die. Orcas are specifically known for caring for their elderly and disabled pod members.
    $endgroup$
    – Separatrix
    Mar 13 at 12:23







  • 9




    $begingroup$
    There's another theory that applies specifically to social species, that says the daughter is likely to have a stronger offspring and that the pod should use the wisdom and knowledge of the matriarch to support grandchildren rather than more children and as such the menopause gives advantage to the group.
    $endgroup$
    – Separatrix
    Mar 13 at 12:30







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    @T.Sar, reduction in fertility or successful reproduction as a function of decrepitude is to be expected in all species, this is noted in cats and dogs as well for example, as they get older they're less successful and in heat less often and less reliably, but there's never a full menopause.
    $endgroup$
    – Separatrix
    Mar 13 at 13:37






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Looks like menopause has also been observed in other primates, including chimps and rhesus monkeys (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2553520). This would bolster the social argument.
    $endgroup$
    – jaxad0127
    yesterday


















18












$begingroup$

This article, in National Geographic, says women can produce eggs:




Women may make new eggs throughout their reproductive years—challenging a longstanding tenet that females are born with finite supplies, a new study says. The discovery may also lead to new avenues for improving women's health and fertility.




Who knew?



This means that the "finite number of eggs" reasoning behind menopause is not an absolute one in human biology, let alone non-human.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Almight is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to the site Almight, please take the tour and read up in our help centre about how we work: How to Answer Good find with the article and pretty good first answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Agrajag
    Mar 13 at 14:54


















11












$begingroup$

Women are born with approximately two million eggs in their ovaries, but about eleven thousand of them die every month prior to puberty.



Given one egg per month gives you a ballpark fertility age of 158,000 years (give or take 1,000 years).



If you're changing human biology enough that this is a normal lifespan, you can change it enough to keep the eggs fresh and only release one per month.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Or maybe even modify the biology to produce eggs to outpace their release?
    $endgroup$
    – corsiKa
    Mar 13 at 15:06






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Production of new eggs throughout life seems more likely. Menopause may be an evolutionary response to the degeneration of egg cells after 50ish years in storage. Most mammals do not live this long. Humans are a long-lived social species in which elderly females have a very useful role to play (teaching and child-care), but breeding from degraded eggs would be a strong evolutionary pressure against a long life. The harder bit to engineer would be getting brain cells to reproduce as needed. They also start to degenerate, and the redundant suppy of brain cells only lasts so long.
    $endgroup$
    – nigel222
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    @nigel222 "Menopause may be an evolutionary response to the degeneration of egg cells after 50ish years in storage" Humans have not been living long enough to such an age, to get an evolutionary response
    $endgroup$
    – Christian
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @Christian: They definitely have been. You're thinking no one lived very long because you've seen the life expectancy figures at birth, and infant/childhood mortality was insane before vaccines, antibiotics, reliable food and clean water supplies, etc. Based on modern hunter-gatherers (who lack most or all of these things), life expectancy at age 15 is another 39 years (to age 54), it's just that there is only a 60% chance of reaching 15 in the first place. Neolithic/Bronze Age folks might have had 5 years lower expectancy at 15, but that's still half the population making it to 49.
    $endgroup$
    – ShadowRanger
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    Point is, it matters more now that we live closer to 80, but there would have been some selective pressures related to aging past 50, even in the Stone Age. Age info from Wikipedia. Of course, the other explanation is that with most of us dying by 50 (and a 50 year old giving birth being unable to care for the child long enough to keep it alive) there wasn't enough pressure to maintain the reproductive system any further than that.
    $endgroup$
    – ShadowRanger
    yesterday



















8












$begingroup$

Meerkat are mammals that have "queens" and a hive-like colony. So the phenomena of queen mammals already exists.



Basically the arrangement is that one or two females do all the breeding for a colony. The rest of the colony look after, feed the children, take care of the "queens", and so on. This is pretty much an identical set up to bees, but with fewer workers, and none of the haploid-ness.



There are a lot of intricacies to having a colony that is based around one or two females doing all the breeding that you can look into. For example avoiding inbreeding. However with regard to your specific concern:



Meerkats do not have infinite eggs, and don't need them. Infinite eggs are not required for animals that have finite lifespans. These animals only need to have more eggs than they can use in their lifetime.



Wiki link






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    4












    $begingroup$

    The main issue here is that female mammals don't "produce" eggs, they mature them. every egg a female mammal will ever have is already present in the ovaries at birth.



    To have a mammal with indefinite breeding age, and to reduce the negative effects of age on the egg (older eggs have had more time to become damaged), females must indeed produce eggs on the spot, similar to how the male produce sperm; sperm cells are always new and fresh, since they did not have the time to degrade the way eggs do.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 2




      $begingroup$
      The tools for making sperm don't age perfectly, either... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paternal_age_effect
      $endgroup$
      – user3067860
      Mar 13 at 14:13






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      True; but better than pre-existing proto-eggs (the correct name for them escapes me at the time). Such a tool could be improved to age perfectly, but the current human ovary will inevitably run out, sometime, giving a maximum breeding age and amount of offspring for the female, not so much for the male
      $endgroup$
      – ThisIsMe
      Mar 13 at 14:15


















    -2












    $begingroup$

    The reason why women don't produce eggs for their entire life (making that National Geographic article linked in another answer somewhat dubious) is that this is not in any way in nature's interest. Read "nature" as either "evolution" or "fitness", however you like.



    The incidence of several hereditary defects is directly linked to the mother's age, and goes up exponentially (not linearly). The reason for a 45 year old woman having such a high risk is that, well, her eggs and her DNA are 45 years old.



    For that same reason, nature doesn't want 50 or 60 year olds to deliver, even if food supply and longeviety allowed for it. There's enough eggs in one woman for a couple of hundred thousand years, so 100 years wouldn't be a technical problem -- but nature doesn't want that. Because what they might deliver would have a high likelihood of being vastly inferior.



    Nature isn't loving, kind, and altruistic -- she is a mean bitch. Nature doesn't cater for the inferior. If you aren't good, you are undesired (because you take away precious food and water from the more worthy).






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      "Her eggs are 45 years old" - only if they were born with her. If she created them on the spot, they might only be a few months old. The DNA will be 45 years old, but if that is a problem, why is it not a problem for men?
      $endgroup$
      – Martin Bonner
      2 days ago










    • $begingroup$
      @MartinBonner: The woman does not create eggs on the spot, please do not adhere to this nonsense. If she is 45, her eggs, and the DNA within are 45 years old. That's why e.g. Edwards, Down, or Pätau syndrome (and a few others) depend so drastically on the mother's age. The DNA within a 90 year old man's sperm cells is 64 days old (possibly a few more, if abstinent for longer than 2 months). Stem-spermatogonies, prior to Mitosis, are plain normal cells with all normal mechanisms, including DNA repair (and apoptosis which will "fix" trisomies).
      $endgroup$
      – Damon
      2 days ago











    • $begingroup$
      This is World Building. We are allowed to imagine other possibilities here; continuous production of eggs doesn't seem a particularly unreasonable one. If there is some evidence if happens to a certain extent in real life, that's even better (age related risks of Down's syndrome would still apply if 90% of the released eggs were born with the woman, and only 10% were newly generated.)
      $endgroup$
      – Martin Bonner
      2 days ago










    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "579"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f141390%2fhow-could-a-female-member-of-a-species-produce-eggs-unto-death%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    6 Answers
    6






    active

    oldest

    votes








    6 Answers
    6






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    61












    $begingroup$

    The concept of a menopause is actually unusual, it's known to exist in the wild in 5 species, Humans, Orcas, Belugas, Narwhals, Short Finned Pilot Whales. While some other species exhibit menopause in captivity, others are definitely known not to e.g. cats and dogs.



    In all other species the females are believed to remain fertile for their entire lives.



    The only queen mammal I'm aware of is the naked mole rat.




    The relationships between the queen and the breeding males may last for many years; other females are temporarily sterile. Queens live from 13 to 18 years, and are extremely hostile to other females behaving like queens, or producing hormones for becoming queens. When the queen dies, another female takes her place, sometimes after a violent struggle with her competitors. Once established, the new queen's body expands the space between the vertebrae in her backbone to become longer and ready to bear pups.







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 6




      $begingroup$
      This answer actually surprised me quite a bit. I wasn't aware that menopause was so rare. So, in a sense, for other mammals what blocks older females from procreating isn't fertility, but the actual ability for the body to sustain the pregnancy?
      $endgroup$
      – T. Sar
      Mar 13 at 12:19






    • 11




      $begingroup$
      @T.Sar, there's a theory that basically says something eats them before they become infertile. Note that all known species are at or close to the top of the food chain and highly social, so an individual no longer capable of surviving alone, or increasingly vulnerable due to age isn't necessarily going to be left out to die. Orcas are specifically known for caring for their elderly and disabled pod members.
      $endgroup$
      – Separatrix
      Mar 13 at 12:23







    • 9




      $begingroup$
      There's another theory that applies specifically to social species, that says the daughter is likely to have a stronger offspring and that the pod should use the wisdom and knowledge of the matriarch to support grandchildren rather than more children and as such the menopause gives advantage to the group.
      $endgroup$
      – Separatrix
      Mar 13 at 12:30







    • 5




      $begingroup$
      @T.Sar, reduction in fertility or successful reproduction as a function of decrepitude is to be expected in all species, this is noted in cats and dogs as well for example, as they get older they're less successful and in heat less often and less reliably, but there's never a full menopause.
      $endgroup$
      – Separatrix
      Mar 13 at 13:37






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Looks like menopause has also been observed in other primates, including chimps and rhesus monkeys (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2553520). This would bolster the social argument.
      $endgroup$
      – jaxad0127
      yesterday















    61












    $begingroup$

    The concept of a menopause is actually unusual, it's known to exist in the wild in 5 species, Humans, Orcas, Belugas, Narwhals, Short Finned Pilot Whales. While some other species exhibit menopause in captivity, others are definitely known not to e.g. cats and dogs.



    In all other species the females are believed to remain fertile for their entire lives.



    The only queen mammal I'm aware of is the naked mole rat.




    The relationships between the queen and the breeding males may last for many years; other females are temporarily sterile. Queens live from 13 to 18 years, and are extremely hostile to other females behaving like queens, or producing hormones for becoming queens. When the queen dies, another female takes her place, sometimes after a violent struggle with her competitors. Once established, the new queen's body expands the space between the vertebrae in her backbone to become longer and ready to bear pups.







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 6




      $begingroup$
      This answer actually surprised me quite a bit. I wasn't aware that menopause was so rare. So, in a sense, for other mammals what blocks older females from procreating isn't fertility, but the actual ability for the body to sustain the pregnancy?
      $endgroup$
      – T. Sar
      Mar 13 at 12:19






    • 11




      $begingroup$
      @T.Sar, there's a theory that basically says something eats them before they become infertile. Note that all known species are at or close to the top of the food chain and highly social, so an individual no longer capable of surviving alone, or increasingly vulnerable due to age isn't necessarily going to be left out to die. Orcas are specifically known for caring for their elderly and disabled pod members.
      $endgroup$
      – Separatrix
      Mar 13 at 12:23







    • 9




      $begingroup$
      There's another theory that applies specifically to social species, that says the daughter is likely to have a stronger offspring and that the pod should use the wisdom and knowledge of the matriarch to support grandchildren rather than more children and as such the menopause gives advantage to the group.
      $endgroup$
      – Separatrix
      Mar 13 at 12:30







    • 5




      $begingroup$
      @T.Sar, reduction in fertility or successful reproduction as a function of decrepitude is to be expected in all species, this is noted in cats and dogs as well for example, as they get older they're less successful and in heat less often and less reliably, but there's never a full menopause.
      $endgroup$
      – Separatrix
      Mar 13 at 13:37






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Looks like menopause has also been observed in other primates, including chimps and rhesus monkeys (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2553520). This would bolster the social argument.
      $endgroup$
      – jaxad0127
      yesterday













    61












    61








    61





    $begingroup$

    The concept of a menopause is actually unusual, it's known to exist in the wild in 5 species, Humans, Orcas, Belugas, Narwhals, Short Finned Pilot Whales. While some other species exhibit menopause in captivity, others are definitely known not to e.g. cats and dogs.



    In all other species the females are believed to remain fertile for their entire lives.



    The only queen mammal I'm aware of is the naked mole rat.




    The relationships between the queen and the breeding males may last for many years; other females are temporarily sterile. Queens live from 13 to 18 years, and are extremely hostile to other females behaving like queens, or producing hormones for becoming queens. When the queen dies, another female takes her place, sometimes after a violent struggle with her competitors. Once established, the new queen's body expands the space between the vertebrae in her backbone to become longer and ready to bear pups.







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    The concept of a menopause is actually unusual, it's known to exist in the wild in 5 species, Humans, Orcas, Belugas, Narwhals, Short Finned Pilot Whales. While some other species exhibit menopause in captivity, others are definitely known not to e.g. cats and dogs.



    In all other species the females are believed to remain fertile for their entire lives.



    The only queen mammal I'm aware of is the naked mole rat.




    The relationships between the queen and the breeding males may last for many years; other females are temporarily sterile. Queens live from 13 to 18 years, and are extremely hostile to other females behaving like queens, or producing hormones for becoming queens. When the queen dies, another female takes her place, sometimes after a violent struggle with her competitors. Once established, the new queen's body expands the space between the vertebrae in her backbone to become longer and ready to bear pups.








    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Mar 13 at 12:25

























    answered Mar 13 at 8:42









    SeparatrixSeparatrix

    84.3k31196327




    84.3k31196327







    • 6




      $begingroup$
      This answer actually surprised me quite a bit. I wasn't aware that menopause was so rare. So, in a sense, for other mammals what blocks older females from procreating isn't fertility, but the actual ability for the body to sustain the pregnancy?
      $endgroup$
      – T. Sar
      Mar 13 at 12:19






    • 11




      $begingroup$
      @T.Sar, there's a theory that basically says something eats them before they become infertile. Note that all known species are at or close to the top of the food chain and highly social, so an individual no longer capable of surviving alone, or increasingly vulnerable due to age isn't necessarily going to be left out to die. Orcas are specifically known for caring for their elderly and disabled pod members.
      $endgroup$
      – Separatrix
      Mar 13 at 12:23







    • 9




      $begingroup$
      There's another theory that applies specifically to social species, that says the daughter is likely to have a stronger offspring and that the pod should use the wisdom and knowledge of the matriarch to support grandchildren rather than more children and as such the menopause gives advantage to the group.
      $endgroup$
      – Separatrix
      Mar 13 at 12:30







    • 5




      $begingroup$
      @T.Sar, reduction in fertility or successful reproduction as a function of decrepitude is to be expected in all species, this is noted in cats and dogs as well for example, as they get older they're less successful and in heat less often and less reliably, but there's never a full menopause.
      $endgroup$
      – Separatrix
      Mar 13 at 13:37






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Looks like menopause has also been observed in other primates, including chimps and rhesus monkeys (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2553520). This would bolster the social argument.
      $endgroup$
      – jaxad0127
      yesterday












    • 6




      $begingroup$
      This answer actually surprised me quite a bit. I wasn't aware that menopause was so rare. So, in a sense, for other mammals what blocks older females from procreating isn't fertility, but the actual ability for the body to sustain the pregnancy?
      $endgroup$
      – T. Sar
      Mar 13 at 12:19






    • 11




      $begingroup$
      @T.Sar, there's a theory that basically says something eats them before they become infertile. Note that all known species are at or close to the top of the food chain and highly social, so an individual no longer capable of surviving alone, or increasingly vulnerable due to age isn't necessarily going to be left out to die. Orcas are specifically known for caring for their elderly and disabled pod members.
      $endgroup$
      – Separatrix
      Mar 13 at 12:23







    • 9




      $begingroup$
      There's another theory that applies specifically to social species, that says the daughter is likely to have a stronger offspring and that the pod should use the wisdom and knowledge of the matriarch to support grandchildren rather than more children and as such the menopause gives advantage to the group.
      $endgroup$
      – Separatrix
      Mar 13 at 12:30







    • 5




      $begingroup$
      @T.Sar, reduction in fertility or successful reproduction as a function of decrepitude is to be expected in all species, this is noted in cats and dogs as well for example, as they get older they're less successful and in heat less often and less reliably, but there's never a full menopause.
      $endgroup$
      – Separatrix
      Mar 13 at 13:37






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Looks like menopause has also been observed in other primates, including chimps and rhesus monkeys (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2553520). This would bolster the social argument.
      $endgroup$
      – jaxad0127
      yesterday







    6




    6




    $begingroup$
    This answer actually surprised me quite a bit. I wasn't aware that menopause was so rare. So, in a sense, for other mammals what blocks older females from procreating isn't fertility, but the actual ability for the body to sustain the pregnancy?
    $endgroup$
    – T. Sar
    Mar 13 at 12:19




    $begingroup$
    This answer actually surprised me quite a bit. I wasn't aware that menopause was so rare. So, in a sense, for other mammals what blocks older females from procreating isn't fertility, but the actual ability for the body to sustain the pregnancy?
    $endgroup$
    – T. Sar
    Mar 13 at 12:19




    11




    11




    $begingroup$
    @T.Sar, there's a theory that basically says something eats them before they become infertile. Note that all known species are at or close to the top of the food chain and highly social, so an individual no longer capable of surviving alone, or increasingly vulnerable due to age isn't necessarily going to be left out to die. Orcas are specifically known for caring for their elderly and disabled pod members.
    $endgroup$
    – Separatrix
    Mar 13 at 12:23





    $begingroup$
    @T.Sar, there's a theory that basically says something eats them before they become infertile. Note that all known species are at or close to the top of the food chain and highly social, so an individual no longer capable of surviving alone, or increasingly vulnerable due to age isn't necessarily going to be left out to die. Orcas are specifically known for caring for their elderly and disabled pod members.
    $endgroup$
    – Separatrix
    Mar 13 at 12:23





    9




    9




    $begingroup$
    There's another theory that applies specifically to social species, that says the daughter is likely to have a stronger offspring and that the pod should use the wisdom and knowledge of the matriarch to support grandchildren rather than more children and as such the menopause gives advantage to the group.
    $endgroup$
    – Separatrix
    Mar 13 at 12:30





    $begingroup$
    There's another theory that applies specifically to social species, that says the daughter is likely to have a stronger offspring and that the pod should use the wisdom and knowledge of the matriarch to support grandchildren rather than more children and as such the menopause gives advantage to the group.
    $endgroup$
    – Separatrix
    Mar 13 at 12:30





    5




    5




    $begingroup$
    @T.Sar, reduction in fertility or successful reproduction as a function of decrepitude is to be expected in all species, this is noted in cats and dogs as well for example, as they get older they're less successful and in heat less often and less reliably, but there's never a full menopause.
    $endgroup$
    – Separatrix
    Mar 13 at 13:37




    $begingroup$
    @T.Sar, reduction in fertility or successful reproduction as a function of decrepitude is to be expected in all species, this is noted in cats and dogs as well for example, as they get older they're less successful and in heat less often and less reliably, but there's never a full menopause.
    $endgroup$
    – Separatrix
    Mar 13 at 13:37




    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    Looks like menopause has also been observed in other primates, including chimps and rhesus monkeys (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2553520). This would bolster the social argument.
    $endgroup$
    – jaxad0127
    yesterday




    $begingroup$
    Looks like menopause has also been observed in other primates, including chimps and rhesus monkeys (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2553520). This would bolster the social argument.
    $endgroup$
    – jaxad0127
    yesterday











    18












    $begingroup$

    This article, in National Geographic, says women can produce eggs:




    Women may make new eggs throughout their reproductive years—challenging a longstanding tenet that females are born with finite supplies, a new study says. The discovery may also lead to new avenues for improving women's health and fertility.




    Who knew?



    This means that the "finite number of eggs" reasoning behind menopause is not an absolute one in human biology, let alone non-human.






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Almight is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$








    • 3




      $begingroup$
      Welcome to the site Almight, please take the tour and read up in our help centre about how we work: How to Answer Good find with the article and pretty good first answer.
      $endgroup$
      – Agrajag
      Mar 13 at 14:54















    18












    $begingroup$

    This article, in National Geographic, says women can produce eggs:




    Women may make new eggs throughout their reproductive years—challenging a longstanding tenet that females are born with finite supplies, a new study says. The discovery may also lead to new avenues for improving women's health and fertility.




    Who knew?



    This means that the "finite number of eggs" reasoning behind menopause is not an absolute one in human biology, let alone non-human.






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Almight is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$








    • 3




      $begingroup$
      Welcome to the site Almight, please take the tour and read up in our help centre about how we work: How to Answer Good find with the article and pretty good first answer.
      $endgroup$
      – Agrajag
      Mar 13 at 14:54













    18












    18








    18





    $begingroup$

    This article, in National Geographic, says women can produce eggs:




    Women may make new eggs throughout their reproductive years—challenging a longstanding tenet that females are born with finite supplies, a new study says. The discovery may also lead to new avenues for improving women's health and fertility.




    Who knew?



    This means that the "finite number of eggs" reasoning behind menopause is not an absolute one in human biology, let alone non-human.






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Almight is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$



    This article, in National Geographic, says women can produce eggs:




    Women may make new eggs throughout their reproductive years—challenging a longstanding tenet that females are born with finite supplies, a new study says. The discovery may also lead to new avenues for improving women's health and fertility.




    Who knew?



    This means that the "finite number of eggs" reasoning behind menopause is not an absolute one in human biology, let alone non-human.







    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Almight is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Mar 13 at 14:20









    Yakk

    8,84911238




    8,84911238






    New contributor




    Almight is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    answered Mar 13 at 14:07









    AlmightAlmight

    1813




    1813




    New contributor




    Almight is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





    New contributor





    Almight is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    Almight is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    • 3




      $begingroup$
      Welcome to the site Almight, please take the tour and read up in our help centre about how we work: How to Answer Good find with the article and pretty good first answer.
      $endgroup$
      – Agrajag
      Mar 13 at 14:54












    • 3




      $begingroup$
      Welcome to the site Almight, please take the tour and read up in our help centre about how we work: How to Answer Good find with the article and pretty good first answer.
      $endgroup$
      – Agrajag
      Mar 13 at 14:54







    3




    3




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to the site Almight, please take the tour and read up in our help centre about how we work: How to Answer Good find with the article and pretty good first answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Agrajag
    Mar 13 at 14:54




    $begingroup$
    Welcome to the site Almight, please take the tour and read up in our help centre about how we work: How to Answer Good find with the article and pretty good first answer.
    $endgroup$
    – Agrajag
    Mar 13 at 14:54











    11












    $begingroup$

    Women are born with approximately two million eggs in their ovaries, but about eleven thousand of them die every month prior to puberty.



    Given one egg per month gives you a ballpark fertility age of 158,000 years (give or take 1,000 years).



    If you're changing human biology enough that this is a normal lifespan, you can change it enough to keep the eggs fresh and only release one per month.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 4




      $begingroup$
      Or maybe even modify the biology to produce eggs to outpace their release?
      $endgroup$
      – corsiKa
      Mar 13 at 15:06






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Production of new eggs throughout life seems more likely. Menopause may be an evolutionary response to the degeneration of egg cells after 50ish years in storage. Most mammals do not live this long. Humans are a long-lived social species in which elderly females have a very useful role to play (teaching and child-care), but breeding from degraded eggs would be a strong evolutionary pressure against a long life. The harder bit to engineer would be getting brain cells to reproduce as needed. They also start to degenerate, and the redundant suppy of brain cells only lasts so long.
      $endgroup$
      – nigel222
      2 days ago










    • $begingroup$
      @nigel222 "Menopause may be an evolutionary response to the degeneration of egg cells after 50ish years in storage" Humans have not been living long enough to such an age, to get an evolutionary response
      $endgroup$
      – Christian
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      @Christian: They definitely have been. You're thinking no one lived very long because you've seen the life expectancy figures at birth, and infant/childhood mortality was insane before vaccines, antibiotics, reliable food and clean water supplies, etc. Based on modern hunter-gatherers (who lack most or all of these things), life expectancy at age 15 is another 39 years (to age 54), it's just that there is only a 60% chance of reaching 15 in the first place. Neolithic/Bronze Age folks might have had 5 years lower expectancy at 15, but that's still half the population making it to 49.
      $endgroup$
      – ShadowRanger
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      Point is, it matters more now that we live closer to 80, but there would have been some selective pressures related to aging past 50, even in the Stone Age. Age info from Wikipedia. Of course, the other explanation is that with most of us dying by 50 (and a 50 year old giving birth being unable to care for the child long enough to keep it alive) there wasn't enough pressure to maintain the reproductive system any further than that.
      $endgroup$
      – ShadowRanger
      yesterday
















    11












    $begingroup$

    Women are born with approximately two million eggs in their ovaries, but about eleven thousand of them die every month prior to puberty.



    Given one egg per month gives you a ballpark fertility age of 158,000 years (give or take 1,000 years).



    If you're changing human biology enough that this is a normal lifespan, you can change it enough to keep the eggs fresh and only release one per month.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 4




      $begingroup$
      Or maybe even modify the biology to produce eggs to outpace their release?
      $endgroup$
      – corsiKa
      Mar 13 at 15:06






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Production of new eggs throughout life seems more likely. Menopause may be an evolutionary response to the degeneration of egg cells after 50ish years in storage. Most mammals do not live this long. Humans are a long-lived social species in which elderly females have a very useful role to play (teaching and child-care), but breeding from degraded eggs would be a strong evolutionary pressure against a long life. The harder bit to engineer would be getting brain cells to reproduce as needed. They also start to degenerate, and the redundant suppy of brain cells only lasts so long.
      $endgroup$
      – nigel222
      2 days ago










    • $begingroup$
      @nigel222 "Menopause may be an evolutionary response to the degeneration of egg cells after 50ish years in storage" Humans have not been living long enough to such an age, to get an evolutionary response
      $endgroup$
      – Christian
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      @Christian: They definitely have been. You're thinking no one lived very long because you've seen the life expectancy figures at birth, and infant/childhood mortality was insane before vaccines, antibiotics, reliable food and clean water supplies, etc. Based on modern hunter-gatherers (who lack most or all of these things), life expectancy at age 15 is another 39 years (to age 54), it's just that there is only a 60% chance of reaching 15 in the first place. Neolithic/Bronze Age folks might have had 5 years lower expectancy at 15, but that's still half the population making it to 49.
      $endgroup$
      – ShadowRanger
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      Point is, it matters more now that we live closer to 80, but there would have been some selective pressures related to aging past 50, even in the Stone Age. Age info from Wikipedia. Of course, the other explanation is that with most of us dying by 50 (and a 50 year old giving birth being unable to care for the child long enough to keep it alive) there wasn't enough pressure to maintain the reproductive system any further than that.
      $endgroup$
      – ShadowRanger
      yesterday














    11












    11








    11





    $begingroup$

    Women are born with approximately two million eggs in their ovaries, but about eleven thousand of them die every month prior to puberty.



    Given one egg per month gives you a ballpark fertility age of 158,000 years (give or take 1,000 years).



    If you're changing human biology enough that this is a normal lifespan, you can change it enough to keep the eggs fresh and only release one per month.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Women are born with approximately two million eggs in their ovaries, but about eleven thousand of them die every month prior to puberty.



    Given one egg per month gives you a ballpark fertility age of 158,000 years (give or take 1,000 years).



    If you're changing human biology enough that this is a normal lifespan, you can change it enough to keep the eggs fresh and only release one per month.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Mar 13 at 8:41









    Binary WorrierBinary Worrier

    2,110815




    2,110815







    • 4




      $begingroup$
      Or maybe even modify the biology to produce eggs to outpace their release?
      $endgroup$
      – corsiKa
      Mar 13 at 15:06






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Production of new eggs throughout life seems more likely. Menopause may be an evolutionary response to the degeneration of egg cells after 50ish years in storage. Most mammals do not live this long. Humans are a long-lived social species in which elderly females have a very useful role to play (teaching and child-care), but breeding from degraded eggs would be a strong evolutionary pressure against a long life. The harder bit to engineer would be getting brain cells to reproduce as needed. They also start to degenerate, and the redundant suppy of brain cells only lasts so long.
      $endgroup$
      – nigel222
      2 days ago










    • $begingroup$
      @nigel222 "Menopause may be an evolutionary response to the degeneration of egg cells after 50ish years in storage" Humans have not been living long enough to such an age, to get an evolutionary response
      $endgroup$
      – Christian
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      @Christian: They definitely have been. You're thinking no one lived very long because you've seen the life expectancy figures at birth, and infant/childhood mortality was insane before vaccines, antibiotics, reliable food and clean water supplies, etc. Based on modern hunter-gatherers (who lack most or all of these things), life expectancy at age 15 is another 39 years (to age 54), it's just that there is only a 60% chance of reaching 15 in the first place. Neolithic/Bronze Age folks might have had 5 years lower expectancy at 15, but that's still half the population making it to 49.
      $endgroup$
      – ShadowRanger
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      Point is, it matters more now that we live closer to 80, but there would have been some selective pressures related to aging past 50, even in the Stone Age. Age info from Wikipedia. Of course, the other explanation is that with most of us dying by 50 (and a 50 year old giving birth being unable to care for the child long enough to keep it alive) there wasn't enough pressure to maintain the reproductive system any further than that.
      $endgroup$
      – ShadowRanger
      yesterday













    • 4




      $begingroup$
      Or maybe even modify the biology to produce eggs to outpace their release?
      $endgroup$
      – corsiKa
      Mar 13 at 15:06






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Production of new eggs throughout life seems more likely. Menopause may be an evolutionary response to the degeneration of egg cells after 50ish years in storage. Most mammals do not live this long. Humans are a long-lived social species in which elderly females have a very useful role to play (teaching and child-care), but breeding from degraded eggs would be a strong evolutionary pressure against a long life. The harder bit to engineer would be getting brain cells to reproduce as needed. They also start to degenerate, and the redundant suppy of brain cells only lasts so long.
      $endgroup$
      – nigel222
      2 days ago










    • $begingroup$
      @nigel222 "Menopause may be an evolutionary response to the degeneration of egg cells after 50ish years in storage" Humans have not been living long enough to such an age, to get an evolutionary response
      $endgroup$
      – Christian
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      @Christian: They definitely have been. You're thinking no one lived very long because you've seen the life expectancy figures at birth, and infant/childhood mortality was insane before vaccines, antibiotics, reliable food and clean water supplies, etc. Based on modern hunter-gatherers (who lack most or all of these things), life expectancy at age 15 is another 39 years (to age 54), it's just that there is only a 60% chance of reaching 15 in the first place. Neolithic/Bronze Age folks might have had 5 years lower expectancy at 15, but that's still half the population making it to 49.
      $endgroup$
      – ShadowRanger
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      Point is, it matters more now that we live closer to 80, but there would have been some selective pressures related to aging past 50, even in the Stone Age. Age info from Wikipedia. Of course, the other explanation is that with most of us dying by 50 (and a 50 year old giving birth being unable to care for the child long enough to keep it alive) there wasn't enough pressure to maintain the reproductive system any further than that.
      $endgroup$
      – ShadowRanger
      yesterday








    4




    4




    $begingroup$
    Or maybe even modify the biology to produce eggs to outpace their release?
    $endgroup$
    – corsiKa
    Mar 13 at 15:06




    $begingroup$
    Or maybe even modify the biology to produce eggs to outpace their release?
    $endgroup$
    – corsiKa
    Mar 13 at 15:06




    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    Production of new eggs throughout life seems more likely. Menopause may be an evolutionary response to the degeneration of egg cells after 50ish years in storage. Most mammals do not live this long. Humans are a long-lived social species in which elderly females have a very useful role to play (teaching and child-care), but breeding from degraded eggs would be a strong evolutionary pressure against a long life. The harder bit to engineer would be getting brain cells to reproduce as needed. They also start to degenerate, and the redundant suppy of brain cells only lasts so long.
    $endgroup$
    – nigel222
    2 days ago




    $begingroup$
    Production of new eggs throughout life seems more likely. Menopause may be an evolutionary response to the degeneration of egg cells after 50ish years in storage. Most mammals do not live this long. Humans are a long-lived social species in which elderly females have a very useful role to play (teaching and child-care), but breeding from degraded eggs would be a strong evolutionary pressure against a long life. The harder bit to engineer would be getting brain cells to reproduce as needed. They also start to degenerate, and the redundant suppy of brain cells only lasts so long.
    $endgroup$
    – nigel222
    2 days ago












    $begingroup$
    @nigel222 "Menopause may be an evolutionary response to the degeneration of egg cells after 50ish years in storage" Humans have not been living long enough to such an age, to get an evolutionary response
    $endgroup$
    – Christian
    yesterday




    $begingroup$
    @nigel222 "Menopause may be an evolutionary response to the degeneration of egg cells after 50ish years in storage" Humans have not been living long enough to such an age, to get an evolutionary response
    $endgroup$
    – Christian
    yesterday












    $begingroup$
    @Christian: They definitely have been. You're thinking no one lived very long because you've seen the life expectancy figures at birth, and infant/childhood mortality was insane before vaccines, antibiotics, reliable food and clean water supplies, etc. Based on modern hunter-gatherers (who lack most or all of these things), life expectancy at age 15 is another 39 years (to age 54), it's just that there is only a 60% chance of reaching 15 in the first place. Neolithic/Bronze Age folks might have had 5 years lower expectancy at 15, but that's still half the population making it to 49.
    $endgroup$
    – ShadowRanger
    yesterday




    $begingroup$
    @Christian: They definitely have been. You're thinking no one lived very long because you've seen the life expectancy figures at birth, and infant/childhood mortality was insane before vaccines, antibiotics, reliable food and clean water supplies, etc. Based on modern hunter-gatherers (who lack most or all of these things), life expectancy at age 15 is another 39 years (to age 54), it's just that there is only a 60% chance of reaching 15 in the first place. Neolithic/Bronze Age folks might have had 5 years lower expectancy at 15, but that's still half the population making it to 49.
    $endgroup$
    – ShadowRanger
    yesterday












    $begingroup$
    Point is, it matters more now that we live closer to 80, but there would have been some selective pressures related to aging past 50, even in the Stone Age. Age info from Wikipedia. Of course, the other explanation is that with most of us dying by 50 (and a 50 year old giving birth being unable to care for the child long enough to keep it alive) there wasn't enough pressure to maintain the reproductive system any further than that.
    $endgroup$
    – ShadowRanger
    yesterday





    $begingroup$
    Point is, it matters more now that we live closer to 80, but there would have been some selective pressures related to aging past 50, even in the Stone Age. Age info from Wikipedia. Of course, the other explanation is that with most of us dying by 50 (and a 50 year old giving birth being unable to care for the child long enough to keep it alive) there wasn't enough pressure to maintain the reproductive system any further than that.
    $endgroup$
    – ShadowRanger
    yesterday












    8












    $begingroup$

    Meerkat are mammals that have "queens" and a hive-like colony. So the phenomena of queen mammals already exists.



    Basically the arrangement is that one or two females do all the breeding for a colony. The rest of the colony look after, feed the children, take care of the "queens", and so on. This is pretty much an identical set up to bees, but with fewer workers, and none of the haploid-ness.



    There are a lot of intricacies to having a colony that is based around one or two females doing all the breeding that you can look into. For example avoiding inbreeding. However with regard to your specific concern:



    Meerkats do not have infinite eggs, and don't need them. Infinite eggs are not required for animals that have finite lifespans. These animals only need to have more eggs than they can use in their lifetime.



    Wiki link






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      8












      $begingroup$

      Meerkat are mammals that have "queens" and a hive-like colony. So the phenomena of queen mammals already exists.



      Basically the arrangement is that one or two females do all the breeding for a colony. The rest of the colony look after, feed the children, take care of the "queens", and so on. This is pretty much an identical set up to bees, but with fewer workers, and none of the haploid-ness.



      There are a lot of intricacies to having a colony that is based around one or two females doing all the breeding that you can look into. For example avoiding inbreeding. However with regard to your specific concern:



      Meerkats do not have infinite eggs, and don't need them. Infinite eggs are not required for animals that have finite lifespans. These animals only need to have more eggs than they can use in their lifetime.



      Wiki link






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        8












        8








        8





        $begingroup$

        Meerkat are mammals that have "queens" and a hive-like colony. So the phenomena of queen mammals already exists.



        Basically the arrangement is that one or two females do all the breeding for a colony. The rest of the colony look after, feed the children, take care of the "queens", and so on. This is pretty much an identical set up to bees, but with fewer workers, and none of the haploid-ness.



        There are a lot of intricacies to having a colony that is based around one or two females doing all the breeding that you can look into. For example avoiding inbreeding. However with regard to your specific concern:



        Meerkats do not have infinite eggs, and don't need them. Infinite eggs are not required for animals that have finite lifespans. These animals only need to have more eggs than they can use in their lifetime.



        Wiki link






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Meerkat are mammals that have "queens" and a hive-like colony. So the phenomena of queen mammals already exists.



        Basically the arrangement is that one or two females do all the breeding for a colony. The rest of the colony look after, feed the children, take care of the "queens", and so on. This is pretty much an identical set up to bees, but with fewer workers, and none of the haploid-ness.



        There are a lot of intricacies to having a colony that is based around one or two females doing all the breeding that you can look into. For example avoiding inbreeding. However with regard to your specific concern:



        Meerkats do not have infinite eggs, and don't need them. Infinite eggs are not required for animals that have finite lifespans. These animals only need to have more eggs than they can use in their lifetime.



        Wiki link







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Mar 13 at 18:28

























        answered Mar 13 at 14:32









        Tyler S. LoeperTyler S. Loeper

        4,5491732




        4,5491732





















            4












            $begingroup$

            The main issue here is that female mammals don't "produce" eggs, they mature them. every egg a female mammal will ever have is already present in the ovaries at birth.



            To have a mammal with indefinite breeding age, and to reduce the negative effects of age on the egg (older eggs have had more time to become damaged), females must indeed produce eggs on the spot, similar to how the male produce sperm; sperm cells are always new and fresh, since they did not have the time to degrade the way eggs do.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$








            • 2




              $begingroup$
              The tools for making sperm don't age perfectly, either... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paternal_age_effect
              $endgroup$
              – user3067860
              Mar 13 at 14:13






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              True; but better than pre-existing proto-eggs (the correct name for them escapes me at the time). Such a tool could be improved to age perfectly, but the current human ovary will inevitably run out, sometime, giving a maximum breeding age and amount of offspring for the female, not so much for the male
              $endgroup$
              – ThisIsMe
              Mar 13 at 14:15















            4












            $begingroup$

            The main issue here is that female mammals don't "produce" eggs, they mature them. every egg a female mammal will ever have is already present in the ovaries at birth.



            To have a mammal with indefinite breeding age, and to reduce the negative effects of age on the egg (older eggs have had more time to become damaged), females must indeed produce eggs on the spot, similar to how the male produce sperm; sperm cells are always new and fresh, since they did not have the time to degrade the way eggs do.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$








            • 2




              $begingroup$
              The tools for making sperm don't age perfectly, either... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paternal_age_effect
              $endgroup$
              – user3067860
              Mar 13 at 14:13






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              True; but better than pre-existing proto-eggs (the correct name for them escapes me at the time). Such a tool could be improved to age perfectly, but the current human ovary will inevitably run out, sometime, giving a maximum breeding age and amount of offspring for the female, not so much for the male
              $endgroup$
              – ThisIsMe
              Mar 13 at 14:15













            4












            4








            4





            $begingroup$

            The main issue here is that female mammals don't "produce" eggs, they mature them. every egg a female mammal will ever have is already present in the ovaries at birth.



            To have a mammal with indefinite breeding age, and to reduce the negative effects of age on the egg (older eggs have had more time to become damaged), females must indeed produce eggs on the spot, similar to how the male produce sperm; sperm cells are always new and fresh, since they did not have the time to degrade the way eggs do.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            The main issue here is that female mammals don't "produce" eggs, they mature them. every egg a female mammal will ever have is already present in the ovaries at birth.



            To have a mammal with indefinite breeding age, and to reduce the negative effects of age on the egg (older eggs have had more time to become damaged), females must indeed produce eggs on the spot, similar to how the male produce sperm; sperm cells are always new and fresh, since they did not have the time to degrade the way eggs do.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Mar 13 at 13:44









            ThisIsMeThisIsMe

            1591




            1591







            • 2




              $begingroup$
              The tools for making sperm don't age perfectly, either... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paternal_age_effect
              $endgroup$
              – user3067860
              Mar 13 at 14:13






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              True; but better than pre-existing proto-eggs (the correct name for them escapes me at the time). Such a tool could be improved to age perfectly, but the current human ovary will inevitably run out, sometime, giving a maximum breeding age and amount of offspring for the female, not so much for the male
              $endgroup$
              – ThisIsMe
              Mar 13 at 14:15












            • 2




              $begingroup$
              The tools for making sperm don't age perfectly, either... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paternal_age_effect
              $endgroup$
              – user3067860
              Mar 13 at 14:13






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              True; but better than pre-existing proto-eggs (the correct name for them escapes me at the time). Such a tool could be improved to age perfectly, but the current human ovary will inevitably run out, sometime, giving a maximum breeding age and amount of offspring for the female, not so much for the male
              $endgroup$
              – ThisIsMe
              Mar 13 at 14:15







            2




            2




            $begingroup$
            The tools for making sperm don't age perfectly, either... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paternal_age_effect
            $endgroup$
            – user3067860
            Mar 13 at 14:13




            $begingroup$
            The tools for making sperm don't age perfectly, either... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paternal_age_effect
            $endgroup$
            – user3067860
            Mar 13 at 14:13




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            True; but better than pre-existing proto-eggs (the correct name for them escapes me at the time). Such a tool could be improved to age perfectly, but the current human ovary will inevitably run out, sometime, giving a maximum breeding age and amount of offspring for the female, not so much for the male
            $endgroup$
            – ThisIsMe
            Mar 13 at 14:15




            $begingroup$
            True; but better than pre-existing proto-eggs (the correct name for them escapes me at the time). Such a tool could be improved to age perfectly, but the current human ovary will inevitably run out, sometime, giving a maximum breeding age and amount of offspring for the female, not so much for the male
            $endgroup$
            – ThisIsMe
            Mar 13 at 14:15











            -2












            $begingroup$

            The reason why women don't produce eggs for their entire life (making that National Geographic article linked in another answer somewhat dubious) is that this is not in any way in nature's interest. Read "nature" as either "evolution" or "fitness", however you like.



            The incidence of several hereditary defects is directly linked to the mother's age, and goes up exponentially (not linearly). The reason for a 45 year old woman having such a high risk is that, well, her eggs and her DNA are 45 years old.



            For that same reason, nature doesn't want 50 or 60 year olds to deliver, even if food supply and longeviety allowed for it. There's enough eggs in one woman for a couple of hundred thousand years, so 100 years wouldn't be a technical problem -- but nature doesn't want that. Because what they might deliver would have a high likelihood of being vastly inferior.



            Nature isn't loving, kind, and altruistic -- she is a mean bitch. Nature doesn't cater for the inferior. If you aren't good, you are undesired (because you take away precious food and water from the more worthy).






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              "Her eggs are 45 years old" - only if they were born with her. If she created them on the spot, they might only be a few months old. The DNA will be 45 years old, but if that is a problem, why is it not a problem for men?
              $endgroup$
              – Martin Bonner
              2 days ago










            • $begingroup$
              @MartinBonner: The woman does not create eggs on the spot, please do not adhere to this nonsense. If she is 45, her eggs, and the DNA within are 45 years old. That's why e.g. Edwards, Down, or Pätau syndrome (and a few others) depend so drastically on the mother's age. The DNA within a 90 year old man's sperm cells is 64 days old (possibly a few more, if abstinent for longer than 2 months). Stem-spermatogonies, prior to Mitosis, are plain normal cells with all normal mechanisms, including DNA repair (and apoptosis which will "fix" trisomies).
              $endgroup$
              – Damon
              2 days ago











            • $begingroup$
              This is World Building. We are allowed to imagine other possibilities here; continuous production of eggs doesn't seem a particularly unreasonable one. If there is some evidence if happens to a certain extent in real life, that's even better (age related risks of Down's syndrome would still apply if 90% of the released eggs were born with the woman, and only 10% were newly generated.)
              $endgroup$
              – Martin Bonner
              2 days ago















            -2












            $begingroup$

            The reason why women don't produce eggs for their entire life (making that National Geographic article linked in another answer somewhat dubious) is that this is not in any way in nature's interest. Read "nature" as either "evolution" or "fitness", however you like.



            The incidence of several hereditary defects is directly linked to the mother's age, and goes up exponentially (not linearly). The reason for a 45 year old woman having such a high risk is that, well, her eggs and her DNA are 45 years old.



            For that same reason, nature doesn't want 50 or 60 year olds to deliver, even if food supply and longeviety allowed for it. There's enough eggs in one woman for a couple of hundred thousand years, so 100 years wouldn't be a technical problem -- but nature doesn't want that. Because what they might deliver would have a high likelihood of being vastly inferior.



            Nature isn't loving, kind, and altruistic -- she is a mean bitch. Nature doesn't cater for the inferior. If you aren't good, you are undesired (because you take away precious food and water from the more worthy).






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              "Her eggs are 45 years old" - only if they were born with her. If she created them on the spot, they might only be a few months old. The DNA will be 45 years old, but if that is a problem, why is it not a problem for men?
              $endgroup$
              – Martin Bonner
              2 days ago










            • $begingroup$
              @MartinBonner: The woman does not create eggs on the spot, please do not adhere to this nonsense. If she is 45, her eggs, and the DNA within are 45 years old. That's why e.g. Edwards, Down, or Pätau syndrome (and a few others) depend so drastically on the mother's age. The DNA within a 90 year old man's sperm cells is 64 days old (possibly a few more, if abstinent for longer than 2 months). Stem-spermatogonies, prior to Mitosis, are plain normal cells with all normal mechanisms, including DNA repair (and apoptosis which will "fix" trisomies).
              $endgroup$
              – Damon
              2 days ago











            • $begingroup$
              This is World Building. We are allowed to imagine other possibilities here; continuous production of eggs doesn't seem a particularly unreasonable one. If there is some evidence if happens to a certain extent in real life, that's even better (age related risks of Down's syndrome would still apply if 90% of the released eggs were born with the woman, and only 10% were newly generated.)
              $endgroup$
              – Martin Bonner
              2 days ago













            -2












            -2








            -2





            $begingroup$

            The reason why women don't produce eggs for their entire life (making that National Geographic article linked in another answer somewhat dubious) is that this is not in any way in nature's interest. Read "nature" as either "evolution" or "fitness", however you like.



            The incidence of several hereditary defects is directly linked to the mother's age, and goes up exponentially (not linearly). The reason for a 45 year old woman having such a high risk is that, well, her eggs and her DNA are 45 years old.



            For that same reason, nature doesn't want 50 or 60 year olds to deliver, even if food supply and longeviety allowed for it. There's enough eggs in one woman for a couple of hundred thousand years, so 100 years wouldn't be a technical problem -- but nature doesn't want that. Because what they might deliver would have a high likelihood of being vastly inferior.



            Nature isn't loving, kind, and altruistic -- she is a mean bitch. Nature doesn't cater for the inferior. If you aren't good, you are undesired (because you take away precious food and water from the more worthy).






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            The reason why women don't produce eggs for their entire life (making that National Geographic article linked in another answer somewhat dubious) is that this is not in any way in nature's interest. Read "nature" as either "evolution" or "fitness", however you like.



            The incidence of several hereditary defects is directly linked to the mother's age, and goes up exponentially (not linearly). The reason for a 45 year old woman having such a high risk is that, well, her eggs and her DNA are 45 years old.



            For that same reason, nature doesn't want 50 or 60 year olds to deliver, even if food supply and longeviety allowed for it. There's enough eggs in one woman for a couple of hundred thousand years, so 100 years wouldn't be a technical problem -- but nature doesn't want that. Because what they might deliver would have a high likelihood of being vastly inferior.



            Nature isn't loving, kind, and altruistic -- she is a mean bitch. Nature doesn't cater for the inferior. If you aren't good, you are undesired (because you take away precious food and water from the more worthy).







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 2 days ago









            DamonDamon

            2,45649




            2,45649







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              "Her eggs are 45 years old" - only if they were born with her. If she created them on the spot, they might only be a few months old. The DNA will be 45 years old, but if that is a problem, why is it not a problem for men?
              $endgroup$
              – Martin Bonner
              2 days ago










            • $begingroup$
              @MartinBonner: The woman does not create eggs on the spot, please do not adhere to this nonsense. If she is 45, her eggs, and the DNA within are 45 years old. That's why e.g. Edwards, Down, or Pätau syndrome (and a few others) depend so drastically on the mother's age. The DNA within a 90 year old man's sperm cells is 64 days old (possibly a few more, if abstinent for longer than 2 months). Stem-spermatogonies, prior to Mitosis, are plain normal cells with all normal mechanisms, including DNA repair (and apoptosis which will "fix" trisomies).
              $endgroup$
              – Damon
              2 days ago











            • $begingroup$
              This is World Building. We are allowed to imagine other possibilities here; continuous production of eggs doesn't seem a particularly unreasonable one. If there is some evidence if happens to a certain extent in real life, that's even better (age related risks of Down's syndrome would still apply if 90% of the released eggs were born with the woman, and only 10% were newly generated.)
              $endgroup$
              – Martin Bonner
              2 days ago












            • 1




              $begingroup$
              "Her eggs are 45 years old" - only if they were born with her. If she created them on the spot, they might only be a few months old. The DNA will be 45 years old, but if that is a problem, why is it not a problem for men?
              $endgroup$
              – Martin Bonner
              2 days ago










            • $begingroup$
              @MartinBonner: The woman does not create eggs on the spot, please do not adhere to this nonsense. If she is 45, her eggs, and the DNA within are 45 years old. That's why e.g. Edwards, Down, or Pätau syndrome (and a few others) depend so drastically on the mother's age. The DNA within a 90 year old man's sperm cells is 64 days old (possibly a few more, if abstinent for longer than 2 months). Stem-spermatogonies, prior to Mitosis, are plain normal cells with all normal mechanisms, including DNA repair (and apoptosis which will "fix" trisomies).
              $endgroup$
              – Damon
              2 days ago











            • $begingroup$
              This is World Building. We are allowed to imagine other possibilities here; continuous production of eggs doesn't seem a particularly unreasonable one. If there is some evidence if happens to a certain extent in real life, that's even better (age related risks of Down's syndrome would still apply if 90% of the released eggs were born with the woman, and only 10% were newly generated.)
              $endgroup$
              – Martin Bonner
              2 days ago







            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            "Her eggs are 45 years old" - only if they were born with her. If she created them on the spot, they might only be a few months old. The DNA will be 45 years old, but if that is a problem, why is it not a problem for men?
            $endgroup$
            – Martin Bonner
            2 days ago




            $begingroup$
            "Her eggs are 45 years old" - only if they were born with her. If she created them on the spot, they might only be a few months old. The DNA will be 45 years old, but if that is a problem, why is it not a problem for men?
            $endgroup$
            – Martin Bonner
            2 days ago












            $begingroup$
            @MartinBonner: The woman does not create eggs on the spot, please do not adhere to this nonsense. If she is 45, her eggs, and the DNA within are 45 years old. That's why e.g. Edwards, Down, or Pätau syndrome (and a few others) depend so drastically on the mother's age. The DNA within a 90 year old man's sperm cells is 64 days old (possibly a few more, if abstinent for longer than 2 months). Stem-spermatogonies, prior to Mitosis, are plain normal cells with all normal mechanisms, including DNA repair (and apoptosis which will "fix" trisomies).
            $endgroup$
            – Damon
            2 days ago





            $begingroup$
            @MartinBonner: The woman does not create eggs on the spot, please do not adhere to this nonsense. If she is 45, her eggs, and the DNA within are 45 years old. That's why e.g. Edwards, Down, or Pätau syndrome (and a few others) depend so drastically on the mother's age. The DNA within a 90 year old man's sperm cells is 64 days old (possibly a few more, if abstinent for longer than 2 months). Stem-spermatogonies, prior to Mitosis, are plain normal cells with all normal mechanisms, including DNA repair (and apoptosis which will "fix" trisomies).
            $endgroup$
            – Damon
            2 days ago













            $begingroup$
            This is World Building. We are allowed to imagine other possibilities here; continuous production of eggs doesn't seem a particularly unreasonable one. If there is some evidence if happens to a certain extent in real life, that's even better (age related risks of Down's syndrome would still apply if 90% of the released eggs were born with the woman, and only 10% were newly generated.)
            $endgroup$
            – Martin Bonner
            2 days ago




            $begingroup$
            This is World Building. We are allowed to imagine other possibilities here; continuous production of eggs doesn't seem a particularly unreasonable one. If there is some evidence if happens to a certain extent in real life, that's even better (age related risks of Down's syndrome would still apply if 90% of the released eggs were born with the woman, and only 10% were newly generated.)
            $endgroup$
            – Martin Bonner
            2 days ago

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f141390%2fhow-could-a-female-member-of-a-species-produce-eggs-unto-death%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Adding axes to figuresAdding axes labels to LaTeX figuresLaTeX equivalent of ConTeXt buffersRotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?adding axes to shapesAlign axes across subfiguresAdding figures with a certain orderLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themAdding axes labels to LaTeX figures

            Tähtien Talli Jäsenet | Lähteet | NavigointivalikkoSuomen Hippos – Tähtien Talli

            Do these cracks on my tires look bad? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowDry rot tire should I replace?Having to replace tiresFishtailed so easily? Bad tires? ABS?Filling the tires with something other than air, to avoid puncture hassles?Used Michelin tires safe to install?Do these tyre cracks necessitate replacement?Rumbling noise: tires or mechanicalIs it possible to fix noisy feathered tires?Are bad winter tires still better than summer tires in winter?Torque converter failure - Related to replacing only 2 tires?Why use snow tires on all 4 wheels on 2-wheel-drive cars?