Problems with making formula look great [on hold]algorithm, algorithmic, algorithmicx, algorithm2e, algpseudocode = confusedLinebreak in math environmentconsistent math font size in a formulaPlease help me input the following formula correctlyThree variables look like a wordProblems with vector fonts and embeddingMaking the text in an align environment italicError “! LaTeX Error: Bad math environment delimiter.”strikethrough math formula in the math modeDifferent alignments in align* formulaFix a formula with fraction 1/2 in subscript mode

How difficult is it to simply disable/disengage the MCAS on Boeing 737 Max 8 & 9 Aircraft?

Min function accepting varying number of arguments in C++17

I got the following comment from a reputed math journal. What does it mean?

Why do passenger jet manufacturers design their planes with stall prevention systems?

Welcoming 2019 Pi day: How to draw the letter π?

How could an airship be repaired midflight?

Is there a symmetric-key algorithm which we can use for creating a signature?

Why does overlay work only on the first tcolorbox?

How could a scammer know the apps on my phone / iTunes account?

Can I use USB data pins as power source

Is there a hypothetical scenario that would make Earth uninhabitable for humans, but not for (the majority of) other animals?

Why does a Star of David appear at a rally with Francisco Franco?

What is the adequate fee for a reveal operation?

Life insurance that covers only simultaneous/dual deaths

PTIJ: Who should I vote for? (21st Knesset Edition)

Fastest way to pop N items from a large dict

Do I need life insurance if I can cover my own funeral costs?

Is "upgrade" the right word to use in this context?

Bacteria contamination inside a thermos bottle

"of which" is correct here?

Recruiter wants very extensive technical details about all of my previous work

Professor being mistaken for a grad student

Are ETF trackers fundamentally better than individual stocks?

As a new Ubuntu desktop 18.04 LTS user, do I need to use ufw for a firewall or is iptables sufficient?



Problems with making formula look great [on hold]


algorithm, algorithmic, algorithmicx, algorithm2e, algpseudocode = confusedLinebreak in math environmentconsistent math font size in a formulaPlease help me input the following formula correctlyThree variables look like a wordProblems with vector fonts and embeddingMaking the text in an align environment italicError “! LaTeX Error: Bad math environment delimiter.”strikethrough math formula in the math modeDifferent alignments in align* formulaFix a formula with fraction 1/2 in subscript mode













5















I have problems to make the below formula look great. Do you have any ideas on how I can make it look better?
enter image description here



This is this LaTeX code I have for it:



PTK = $PRF(PMK, text"Pairwise key expansion" || Min(AA, SPA) || \ MaxAA, SPA|| Min(ANonce, SNonce) || Max(ANonce,SNonce))$


I appreciate all help!










share|improve this question









New contributor




Johan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as primarily opinion-based by JouleV, Sebastiano, Stefan Pinnow, Phelype Oleinik, Raaja 23 hours ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • 2





    Welcome to TeX.SE. In order to help produce an expression that is not only visually appealing but also factually correct and meaningful, it would help to know what || stands for. Please advise.

    – Mico
    yesterday











  • @Mico Seems more like a norm-like operator to me.

    – Raaja
    yesterday











  • @Mico In cryptography || means string concatenation.

    – nomadictype
    yesterday











  • What does "great" mean?

    – David Richerby
    yesterday











  • Perhaps you could be more specific in your request. What is it that you do not like about your current output? We are happy to help with LaTeXing specific requests, but without explaining what you want, "great" and "better" are matters of opinion.

    – Sandy G
    yesterday















5















I have problems to make the below formula look great. Do you have any ideas on how I can make it look better?
enter image description here



This is this LaTeX code I have for it:



PTK = $PRF(PMK, text"Pairwise key expansion" || Min(AA, SPA) || \ MaxAA, SPA|| Min(ANonce, SNonce) || Max(ANonce,SNonce))$


I appreciate all help!










share|improve this question









New contributor




Johan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as primarily opinion-based by JouleV, Sebastiano, Stefan Pinnow, Phelype Oleinik, Raaja 23 hours ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • 2





    Welcome to TeX.SE. In order to help produce an expression that is not only visually appealing but also factually correct and meaningful, it would help to know what || stands for. Please advise.

    – Mico
    yesterday











  • @Mico Seems more like a norm-like operator to me.

    – Raaja
    yesterday











  • @Mico In cryptography || means string concatenation.

    – nomadictype
    yesterday











  • What does "great" mean?

    – David Richerby
    yesterday











  • Perhaps you could be more specific in your request. What is it that you do not like about your current output? We are happy to help with LaTeXing specific requests, but without explaining what you want, "great" and "better" are matters of opinion.

    – Sandy G
    yesterday













5












5








5








I have problems to make the below formula look great. Do you have any ideas on how I can make it look better?
enter image description here



This is this LaTeX code I have for it:



PTK = $PRF(PMK, text"Pairwise key expansion" || Min(AA, SPA) || \ MaxAA, SPA|| Min(ANonce, SNonce) || Max(ANonce,SNonce))$


I appreciate all help!










share|improve this question









New contributor




Johan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












I have problems to make the below formula look great. Do you have any ideas on how I can make it look better?
enter image description here



This is this LaTeX code I have for it:



PTK = $PRF(PMK, text"Pairwise key expansion" || Min(AA, SPA) || \ MaxAA, SPA|| Min(ANonce, SNonce) || Max(ANonce,SNonce))$


I appreciate all help!







math-mode alignment






share|improve this question









New contributor




Johan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Johan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday









JouleV

5,97821549




5,97821549






New contributor




Johan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









JohanJohan

453




453




New contributor




Johan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Johan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Johan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




put on hold as primarily opinion-based by JouleV, Sebastiano, Stefan Pinnow, Phelype Oleinik, Raaja 23 hours ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









put on hold as primarily opinion-based by JouleV, Sebastiano, Stefan Pinnow, Phelype Oleinik, Raaja 23 hours ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









  • 2





    Welcome to TeX.SE. In order to help produce an expression that is not only visually appealing but also factually correct and meaningful, it would help to know what || stands for. Please advise.

    – Mico
    yesterday











  • @Mico Seems more like a norm-like operator to me.

    – Raaja
    yesterday











  • @Mico In cryptography || means string concatenation.

    – nomadictype
    yesterday











  • What does "great" mean?

    – David Richerby
    yesterday











  • Perhaps you could be more specific in your request. What is it that you do not like about your current output? We are happy to help with LaTeXing specific requests, but without explaining what you want, "great" and "better" are matters of opinion.

    – Sandy G
    yesterday












  • 2





    Welcome to TeX.SE. In order to help produce an expression that is not only visually appealing but also factually correct and meaningful, it would help to know what || stands for. Please advise.

    – Mico
    yesterday











  • @Mico Seems more like a norm-like operator to me.

    – Raaja
    yesterday











  • @Mico In cryptography || means string concatenation.

    – nomadictype
    yesterday











  • What does "great" mean?

    – David Richerby
    yesterday











  • Perhaps you could be more specific in your request. What is it that you do not like about your current output? We are happy to help with LaTeXing specific requests, but without explaining what you want, "great" and "better" are matters of opinion.

    – Sandy G
    yesterday







2




2





Welcome to TeX.SE. In order to help produce an expression that is not only visually appealing but also factually correct and meaningful, it would help to know what || stands for. Please advise.

– Mico
yesterday





Welcome to TeX.SE. In order to help produce an expression that is not only visually appealing but also factually correct and meaningful, it would help to know what || stands for. Please advise.

– Mico
yesterday













@Mico Seems more like a norm-like operator to me.

– Raaja
yesterday





@Mico Seems more like a norm-like operator to me.

– Raaja
yesterday













@Mico In cryptography || means string concatenation.

– nomadictype
yesterday





@Mico In cryptography || means string concatenation.

– nomadictype
yesterday













What does "great" mean?

– David Richerby
yesterday





What does "great" mean?

– David Richerby
yesterday













Perhaps you could be more specific in your request. What is it that you do not like about your current output? We are happy to help with LaTeXing specific requests, but without explaining what you want, "great" and "better" are matters of opinion.

– Sandy G
yesterday





Perhaps you could be more specific in your request. What is it that you do not like about your current output? We are happy to help with LaTeXing specific requests, but without explaining what you want, "great" and "better" are matters of opinion.

– Sandy G
yesterday










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















8














I don't know if it looks great, but do you want something like this?



enter image description here



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath

begindocument

[
beginsplit
textPTK = & textPRFleft( textPMK, text"Pairwise key expansion" || min(textAA, textSPA) || right. \
& left. qquad max(textAA, textSPA)|| min(textANonce, textSNonce) || max(textANonce,textSNonce)right)
endsplit
]

enddocument





share|improve this answer























  • Thanks a lot for the great answer!

    – Johan
    yesterday


















9














Taking Ignasi's approach a step further...



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
[
beginsplit
textPTK = textPRFbigl( &textPMK, text``Pairwise key expansion'' \& || min(textAA, textSPA) \
& || max(textAA, textSPA)\&|| min(textANonce, textSNonce) \&|| max(textANonce,textSNonce)bigr)
endsplit
]
enddocument


enter image description here



MFGA






share|improve this answer























  • Thanks a lot for the great answer, I'll go for this one!

    – Johan
    yesterday






  • 2





    @Johan Thanks. While you can click the up-arrow to "upvote" any question or answer on this site that you find helpful, you can select only one answer for each of your questions to click the check on, as a means to "accept" the most suitable answer.

    – Steven B. Segletes
    yesterday



















5














IMHO your formula is in an algorithm and || stands for "or". So you should have a look at algorithm packages. Anyway this is a non-algorithm but algorithmic answer:



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
[
beginarrayr@l@l
textPTK=PRF&(PMK, & text``Pairwise key expansion''\
&& || min(AA,SPA)\
&& || max(AA,SPA)\
&& || min(ANonce,SNonce)\
&& || max(ANonce,SNonce)\
&)&
endarray
]
enddocument


enter image description here



Edit 1: Improved version



I prefer this way.



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
[
beginarrayrl
textPTK=PRF(&\
& PMK,\
& (\
& quadtext``Pairwise key expansion''\
& quad||min(AA,SPA)\
& quad||max(AA,SPA)\
& quad||min(ANonce,SNonce)\
& quad||max(ANonce,SNonce)\
& )\
)&
endarray
]
enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer

























  • Alright thanks a lot! I'm not so good at LaTeX so I'll go for this one, since it looks much better than before! Not sure how much algorithm package would have improved it, but this looks good enough.

    – Johan
    yesterday











  • @Johan I already improved my answer.

    – JouleV
    yesterday


















2














I have two proposals. Most important is to properly define macros for specific object types in your document, in order to ensure uniformity.



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath

newcommandOORmathrel
newcommandtvar[1]mathrm#1
newcommandtdesc[1]textup``#1''

begindocument

[
beginaligned
tvarPTK=tvarPRFbigl(
&tvarPMK,tdescPairwise key expansion \
& OOR min(tvarAA,tvarSPA)\
& OOR max(tvarAA,tvarSPA)\
& OOR min(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce)\
& OOR max(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce) bigr)
endaligned
]

beginmultline*
tvarPTK=tvarPRFbigl(
tvarPMK,tdescPairwise key expansion
OOR min(tvarAA,tvarSPA) OOR \
max(tvarAA,tvarSPA)
OOR min(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce)
OOR max(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce) bigr)
endmultline*

enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer





























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    8














    I don't know if it looks great, but do you want something like this?



    enter image description here



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath

    begindocument

    [
    beginsplit
    textPTK = & textPRFleft( textPMK, text"Pairwise key expansion" || min(textAA, textSPA) || right. \
    & left. qquad max(textAA, textSPA)|| min(textANonce, textSNonce) || max(textANonce,textSNonce)right)
    endsplit
    ]

    enddocument





    share|improve this answer























    • Thanks a lot for the great answer!

      – Johan
      yesterday















    8














    I don't know if it looks great, but do you want something like this?



    enter image description here



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath

    begindocument

    [
    beginsplit
    textPTK = & textPRFleft( textPMK, text"Pairwise key expansion" || min(textAA, textSPA) || right. \
    & left. qquad max(textAA, textSPA)|| min(textANonce, textSNonce) || max(textANonce,textSNonce)right)
    endsplit
    ]

    enddocument





    share|improve this answer























    • Thanks a lot for the great answer!

      – Johan
      yesterday













    8












    8








    8







    I don't know if it looks great, but do you want something like this?



    enter image description here



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath

    begindocument

    [
    beginsplit
    textPTK = & textPRFleft( textPMK, text"Pairwise key expansion" || min(textAA, textSPA) || right. \
    & left. qquad max(textAA, textSPA)|| min(textANonce, textSNonce) || max(textANonce,textSNonce)right)
    endsplit
    ]

    enddocument





    share|improve this answer













    I don't know if it looks great, but do you want something like this?



    enter image description here



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath

    begindocument

    [
    beginsplit
    textPTK = & textPRFleft( textPMK, text"Pairwise key expansion" || min(textAA, textSPA) || right. \
    & left. qquad max(textAA, textSPA)|| min(textANonce, textSNonce) || max(textANonce,textSNonce)right)
    endsplit
    ]

    enddocument






    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered yesterday









    IgnasiIgnasi

    94.8k4175318




    94.8k4175318












    • Thanks a lot for the great answer!

      – Johan
      yesterday

















    • Thanks a lot for the great answer!

      – Johan
      yesterday
















    Thanks a lot for the great answer!

    – Johan
    yesterday





    Thanks a lot for the great answer!

    – Johan
    yesterday











    9














    Taking Ignasi's approach a step further...



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    begindocument
    [
    beginsplit
    textPTK = textPRFbigl( &textPMK, text``Pairwise key expansion'' \& || min(textAA, textSPA) \
    & || max(textAA, textSPA)\&|| min(textANonce, textSNonce) \&|| max(textANonce,textSNonce)bigr)
    endsplit
    ]
    enddocument


    enter image description here



    MFGA






    share|improve this answer























    • Thanks a lot for the great answer, I'll go for this one!

      – Johan
      yesterday






    • 2





      @Johan Thanks. While you can click the up-arrow to "upvote" any question or answer on this site that you find helpful, you can select only one answer for each of your questions to click the check on, as a means to "accept" the most suitable answer.

      – Steven B. Segletes
      yesterday
















    9














    Taking Ignasi's approach a step further...



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    begindocument
    [
    beginsplit
    textPTK = textPRFbigl( &textPMK, text``Pairwise key expansion'' \& || min(textAA, textSPA) \
    & || max(textAA, textSPA)\&|| min(textANonce, textSNonce) \&|| max(textANonce,textSNonce)bigr)
    endsplit
    ]
    enddocument


    enter image description here



    MFGA






    share|improve this answer























    • Thanks a lot for the great answer, I'll go for this one!

      – Johan
      yesterday






    • 2





      @Johan Thanks. While you can click the up-arrow to "upvote" any question or answer on this site that you find helpful, you can select only one answer for each of your questions to click the check on, as a means to "accept" the most suitable answer.

      – Steven B. Segletes
      yesterday














    9












    9








    9







    Taking Ignasi's approach a step further...



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    begindocument
    [
    beginsplit
    textPTK = textPRFbigl( &textPMK, text``Pairwise key expansion'' \& || min(textAA, textSPA) \
    & || max(textAA, textSPA)\&|| min(textANonce, textSNonce) \&|| max(textANonce,textSNonce)bigr)
    endsplit
    ]
    enddocument


    enter image description here



    MFGA






    share|improve this answer













    Taking Ignasi's approach a step further...



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    begindocument
    [
    beginsplit
    textPTK = textPRFbigl( &textPMK, text``Pairwise key expansion'' \& || min(textAA, textSPA) \
    & || max(textAA, textSPA)\&|| min(textANonce, textSNonce) \&|| max(textANonce,textSNonce)bigr)
    endsplit
    ]
    enddocument


    enter image description here



    MFGA







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered yesterday









    Steven B. SegletesSteven B. Segletes

    158k9204411




    158k9204411












    • Thanks a lot for the great answer, I'll go for this one!

      – Johan
      yesterday






    • 2





      @Johan Thanks. While you can click the up-arrow to "upvote" any question or answer on this site that you find helpful, you can select only one answer for each of your questions to click the check on, as a means to "accept" the most suitable answer.

      – Steven B. Segletes
      yesterday


















    • Thanks a lot for the great answer, I'll go for this one!

      – Johan
      yesterday






    • 2





      @Johan Thanks. While you can click the up-arrow to "upvote" any question or answer on this site that you find helpful, you can select only one answer for each of your questions to click the check on, as a means to "accept" the most suitable answer.

      – Steven B. Segletes
      yesterday

















    Thanks a lot for the great answer, I'll go for this one!

    – Johan
    yesterday





    Thanks a lot for the great answer, I'll go for this one!

    – Johan
    yesterday




    2




    2





    @Johan Thanks. While you can click the up-arrow to "upvote" any question or answer on this site that you find helpful, you can select only one answer for each of your questions to click the check on, as a means to "accept" the most suitable answer.

    – Steven B. Segletes
    yesterday






    @Johan Thanks. While you can click the up-arrow to "upvote" any question or answer on this site that you find helpful, you can select only one answer for each of your questions to click the check on, as a means to "accept" the most suitable answer.

    – Steven B. Segletes
    yesterday












    5














    IMHO your formula is in an algorithm and || stands for "or". So you should have a look at algorithm packages. Anyway this is a non-algorithm but algorithmic answer:



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    begindocument
    [
    beginarrayr@l@l
    textPTK=PRF&(PMK, & text``Pairwise key expansion''\
    && || min(AA,SPA)\
    && || max(AA,SPA)\
    && || min(ANonce,SNonce)\
    && || max(ANonce,SNonce)\
    &)&
    endarray
    ]
    enddocument


    enter image description here



    Edit 1: Improved version



    I prefer this way.



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    begindocument
    [
    beginarrayrl
    textPTK=PRF(&\
    & PMK,\
    & (\
    & quadtext``Pairwise key expansion''\
    & quad||min(AA,SPA)\
    & quad||max(AA,SPA)\
    & quad||min(ANonce,SNonce)\
    & quad||max(ANonce,SNonce)\
    & )\
    )&
    endarray
    ]
    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer

























    • Alright thanks a lot! I'm not so good at LaTeX so I'll go for this one, since it looks much better than before! Not sure how much algorithm package would have improved it, but this looks good enough.

      – Johan
      yesterday











    • @Johan I already improved my answer.

      – JouleV
      yesterday















    5














    IMHO your formula is in an algorithm and || stands for "or". So you should have a look at algorithm packages. Anyway this is a non-algorithm but algorithmic answer:



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    begindocument
    [
    beginarrayr@l@l
    textPTK=PRF&(PMK, & text``Pairwise key expansion''\
    && || min(AA,SPA)\
    && || max(AA,SPA)\
    && || min(ANonce,SNonce)\
    && || max(ANonce,SNonce)\
    &)&
    endarray
    ]
    enddocument


    enter image description here



    Edit 1: Improved version



    I prefer this way.



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    begindocument
    [
    beginarrayrl
    textPTK=PRF(&\
    & PMK,\
    & (\
    & quadtext``Pairwise key expansion''\
    & quad||min(AA,SPA)\
    & quad||max(AA,SPA)\
    & quad||min(ANonce,SNonce)\
    & quad||max(ANonce,SNonce)\
    & )\
    )&
    endarray
    ]
    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer

























    • Alright thanks a lot! I'm not so good at LaTeX so I'll go for this one, since it looks much better than before! Not sure how much algorithm package would have improved it, but this looks good enough.

      – Johan
      yesterday











    • @Johan I already improved my answer.

      – JouleV
      yesterday













    5












    5








    5







    IMHO your formula is in an algorithm and || stands for "or". So you should have a look at algorithm packages. Anyway this is a non-algorithm but algorithmic answer:



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    begindocument
    [
    beginarrayr@l@l
    textPTK=PRF&(PMK, & text``Pairwise key expansion''\
    && || min(AA,SPA)\
    && || max(AA,SPA)\
    && || min(ANonce,SNonce)\
    && || max(ANonce,SNonce)\
    &)&
    endarray
    ]
    enddocument


    enter image description here



    Edit 1: Improved version



    I prefer this way.



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    begindocument
    [
    beginarrayrl
    textPTK=PRF(&\
    & PMK,\
    & (\
    & quadtext``Pairwise key expansion''\
    & quad||min(AA,SPA)\
    & quad||max(AA,SPA)\
    & quad||min(ANonce,SNonce)\
    & quad||max(ANonce,SNonce)\
    & )\
    )&
    endarray
    ]
    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer















    IMHO your formula is in an algorithm and || stands for "or". So you should have a look at algorithm packages. Anyway this is a non-algorithm but algorithmic answer:



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    begindocument
    [
    beginarrayr@l@l
    textPTK=PRF&(PMK, & text``Pairwise key expansion''\
    && || min(AA,SPA)\
    && || max(AA,SPA)\
    && || min(ANonce,SNonce)\
    && || max(ANonce,SNonce)\
    &)&
    endarray
    ]
    enddocument


    enter image description here



    Edit 1: Improved version



    I prefer this way.



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    begindocument
    [
    beginarrayrl
    textPTK=PRF(&\
    & PMK,\
    & (\
    & quadtext``Pairwise key expansion''\
    & quad||min(AA,SPA)\
    & quad||max(AA,SPA)\
    & quad||min(ANonce,SNonce)\
    & quad||max(ANonce,SNonce)\
    & )\
    )&
    endarray
    ]
    enddocument


    enter image description here







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited yesterday

























    answered yesterday









    JouleVJouleV

    5,97821549




    5,97821549












    • Alright thanks a lot! I'm not so good at LaTeX so I'll go for this one, since it looks much better than before! Not sure how much algorithm package would have improved it, but this looks good enough.

      – Johan
      yesterday











    • @Johan I already improved my answer.

      – JouleV
      yesterday

















    • Alright thanks a lot! I'm not so good at LaTeX so I'll go for this one, since it looks much better than before! Not sure how much algorithm package would have improved it, but this looks good enough.

      – Johan
      yesterday











    • @Johan I already improved my answer.

      – JouleV
      yesterday
















    Alright thanks a lot! I'm not so good at LaTeX so I'll go for this one, since it looks much better than before! Not sure how much algorithm package would have improved it, but this looks good enough.

    – Johan
    yesterday





    Alright thanks a lot! I'm not so good at LaTeX so I'll go for this one, since it looks much better than before! Not sure how much algorithm package would have improved it, but this looks good enough.

    – Johan
    yesterday













    @Johan I already improved my answer.

    – JouleV
    yesterday





    @Johan I already improved my answer.

    – JouleV
    yesterday











    2














    I have two proposals. Most important is to properly define macros for specific object types in your document, in order to ensure uniformity.



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath

    newcommandOORmathrel
    newcommandtvar[1]mathrm#1
    newcommandtdesc[1]textup``#1''

    begindocument

    [
    beginaligned
    tvarPTK=tvarPRFbigl(
    &tvarPMK,tdescPairwise key expansion \
    & OOR min(tvarAA,tvarSPA)\
    & OOR max(tvarAA,tvarSPA)\
    & OOR min(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce)\
    & OOR max(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce) bigr)
    endaligned
    ]

    beginmultline*
    tvarPTK=tvarPRFbigl(
    tvarPMK,tdescPairwise key expansion
    OOR min(tvarAA,tvarSPA) OOR \
    max(tvarAA,tvarSPA)
    OOR min(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce)
    OOR max(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce) bigr)
    endmultline*

    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer



























      2














      I have two proposals. Most important is to properly define macros for specific object types in your document, in order to ensure uniformity.



      documentclassarticle
      usepackageamsmath

      newcommandOORmathrel
      newcommandtvar[1]mathrm#1
      newcommandtdesc[1]textup``#1''

      begindocument

      [
      beginaligned
      tvarPTK=tvarPRFbigl(
      &tvarPMK,tdescPairwise key expansion \
      & OOR min(tvarAA,tvarSPA)\
      & OOR max(tvarAA,tvarSPA)\
      & OOR min(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce)\
      & OOR max(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce) bigr)
      endaligned
      ]

      beginmultline*
      tvarPTK=tvarPRFbigl(
      tvarPMK,tdescPairwise key expansion
      OOR min(tvarAA,tvarSPA) OOR \
      max(tvarAA,tvarSPA)
      OOR min(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce)
      OOR max(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce) bigr)
      endmultline*

      enddocument


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer

























        2












        2








        2







        I have two proposals. Most important is to properly define macros for specific object types in your document, in order to ensure uniformity.



        documentclassarticle
        usepackageamsmath

        newcommandOORmathrel
        newcommandtvar[1]mathrm#1
        newcommandtdesc[1]textup``#1''

        begindocument

        [
        beginaligned
        tvarPTK=tvarPRFbigl(
        &tvarPMK,tdescPairwise key expansion \
        & OOR min(tvarAA,tvarSPA)\
        & OOR max(tvarAA,tvarSPA)\
        & OOR min(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce)\
        & OOR max(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce) bigr)
        endaligned
        ]

        beginmultline*
        tvarPTK=tvarPRFbigl(
        tvarPMK,tdescPairwise key expansion
        OOR min(tvarAA,tvarSPA) OOR \
        max(tvarAA,tvarSPA)
        OOR min(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce)
        OOR max(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce) bigr)
        endmultline*

        enddocument


        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer













        I have two proposals. Most important is to properly define macros for specific object types in your document, in order to ensure uniformity.



        documentclassarticle
        usepackageamsmath

        newcommandOORmathrel
        newcommandtvar[1]mathrm#1
        newcommandtdesc[1]textup``#1''

        begindocument

        [
        beginaligned
        tvarPTK=tvarPRFbigl(
        &tvarPMK,tdescPairwise key expansion \
        & OOR min(tvarAA,tvarSPA)\
        & OOR max(tvarAA,tvarSPA)\
        & OOR min(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce)\
        & OOR max(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce) bigr)
        endaligned
        ]

        beginmultline*
        tvarPTK=tvarPRFbigl(
        tvarPMK,tdescPairwise key expansion
        OOR min(tvarAA,tvarSPA) OOR \
        max(tvarAA,tvarSPA)
        OOR min(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce)
        OOR max(tvarANonce,tvarSNonce) bigr)
        endmultline*

        enddocument


        enter image description here







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered yesterday









        egregegreg

        726k8819223231




        726k8819223231













            Popular posts from this blog

            Adding axes to figuresAdding axes labels to LaTeX figuresLaTeX equivalent of ConTeXt buffersRotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?adding axes to shapesAlign axes across subfiguresAdding figures with a certain orderLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themAdding axes labels to LaTeX figures

            Luettelo Yhdysvaltain laivaston lentotukialuksista Lähteet | Navigointivalikko

            Gary (muusikko) Sisällysluettelo Historia | Rockin' High | Lähteet | Aiheesta muualla | NavigointivalikkoInfobox OKTuomas "Gary" Keskinen Ancaran kitaristiksiProjekti Rockin' High