Solving system of ODEs with extra parameter The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InTransforming ParametricFunction in expression depending on the parameterSolving a system of ODEs with the Runge-Kutta methodTips for efficiently solving large system coupled (nonlinear) ODEsHow do I pull from a data list for parameter values in a system of ODEs and then solve and plot?Solving PDEs with complicated boundary conditionsSolving Differential Algebraic Equations as BVPSolving a system of coupled Nonlinear ODEs using numeric and get `ndnum` errorIssues to modelize a system of differential equation (NDSolve)Solving PDEs over a region in different co-ordinate system?Error when solving 't Hooft-Polyakov radial equations using NDSolveHow to apply NIntegrate three times
How much of the clove should I use when using big garlic heads?
How to check whether the reindex working or not in Magento?
Loose spokes after only a few rides
How would you translate 「腰掛で仕事をする」
Why didn't the Event Horizon Telescope team mention Sagittarius A*?
Why doesn't mkfifo with a mode of 1755 grant read permissions and sticky bit to the user?
What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw?
Can a flute soloist sit?
Is bread bad for ducks?
Using xargs with pdftk
The difference between dialogue marks
Why is the Constellation's nose gear so long?
Why is ParallelDo slower than Do?
How can I refresh a custom data tab in the contact summary?
Why not take a picture of a closer black hole?
For what reasons would an animal species NOT cross a *horizontal* land bridge?
If I score a critical hit on an 18 or higher, what are my chances of getting a critical hit if I roll 3d20?
Are there any other methods to apply to solving simultaneous equations?
Why doesn't shell automatically fix "useless use of cat"?
two types of coins, decide which type it is based on 100 flips
Ubuntu Server install with full GUI
Command for nulifying spaces
Why was M87 targeted for the Event Horizon Telescope instead of Sagittarius A*?
How to type this arrow in math mode?
Solving system of ODEs with extra parameter
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InTransforming ParametricFunction in expression depending on the parameterSolving a system of ODEs with the Runge-Kutta methodTips for efficiently solving large system coupled (nonlinear) ODEsHow do I pull from a data list for parameter values in a system of ODEs and then solve and plot?Solving PDEs with complicated boundary conditionsSolving Differential Algebraic Equations as BVPSolving a system of coupled Nonlinear ODEs using numeric and get `ndnum` errorIssues to modelize a system of differential equation (NDSolve)Solving PDEs over a region in different co-ordinate system?Error when solving 't Hooft-Polyakov radial equations using NDSolveHow to apply NIntegrate three times
$begingroup$
I would like to solve a $2times 2$ system of the form
$$fracddthetaT=TA,quad T(0)=Id$$
where $theta$ is real and $A$ is of the form
$$A=beginpmatrix 0 & frace^-i thetalambda\ frac136e^-ithetaleft(9lambda + 2(lambda-1)^2 (6costheta + cos2theta + 6)right) & 0endpmatrix,$$
with $lambda$ a free parameter in the unit circle.
In particular I'm interested in obtaining numeric solutions at $theta=2pi$ depending on the extra parameter $lambda$. I'm fairly new using Mathematica, and this is what I have tried so far:
T[θ_] = T11[θ], T12[θ], T21[θ], T22[θ];
A[θ_] =
0, E^(-I θ)/λ,
1/36 E^(-I θ) (9 λ + 2 (-1 + λ)^2 (6 + 6 Cos[θ] + Cos[2 θ])), 0
;
sys = T'[θ] == T[θ].A[θ];
The previous code sets the system that I want to solve and now I try to solve numerically. First I've tried
NSol = NDSolve[
sys, T11[0] == 1, T12[0] == 0, T21[0] == 0, T22[0] == 1,
T11[θ], T12[θ], T21[θ], T22[θ],
θ,
θ, 0, 2 Pi
];
which gives me the output
NDSolve::dupv: "Duplicate variable θ found in NDSolve[<<1>>]."
I have also tried
Nsol2 = ParametricNDSolve[
sys, T11[0] == 1, T12[0] == 0, T21[0] == 0, T22[0] == 1,
T11, T12, T21, T22,
θ, 0, 2 Pi,
λ
];
which gives me as output $T_11,dots,T_22$ as ParametricFunctions depending on each other and on $lambda$.
I don't know if this is the right approach and, if so, how to extract a numeric expression depending on $lambda$ from the last output - all that I've seen in the documentation are examples that are plotted for specific values of the parameter. Any help is much appreciated.
EDIT
Following the comments in one of the answers I'd like to explain further: the output that I would like to obtain is some sort of function depending of the parameter $lambda$ that I can manipulate afterwards. Say for instance, computing the series expansion of powers of $lambda$ of my solution. I don't know how to treat the ParametricFunction that I obtain to do such computations.
differential-equations numerical-integration
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I would like to solve a $2times 2$ system of the form
$$fracddthetaT=TA,quad T(0)=Id$$
where $theta$ is real and $A$ is of the form
$$A=beginpmatrix 0 & frace^-i thetalambda\ frac136e^-ithetaleft(9lambda + 2(lambda-1)^2 (6costheta + cos2theta + 6)right) & 0endpmatrix,$$
with $lambda$ a free parameter in the unit circle.
In particular I'm interested in obtaining numeric solutions at $theta=2pi$ depending on the extra parameter $lambda$. I'm fairly new using Mathematica, and this is what I have tried so far:
T[θ_] = T11[θ], T12[θ], T21[θ], T22[θ];
A[θ_] =
0, E^(-I θ)/λ,
1/36 E^(-I θ) (9 λ + 2 (-1 + λ)^2 (6 + 6 Cos[θ] + Cos[2 θ])), 0
;
sys = T'[θ] == T[θ].A[θ];
The previous code sets the system that I want to solve and now I try to solve numerically. First I've tried
NSol = NDSolve[
sys, T11[0] == 1, T12[0] == 0, T21[0] == 0, T22[0] == 1,
T11[θ], T12[θ], T21[θ], T22[θ],
θ,
θ, 0, 2 Pi
];
which gives me the output
NDSolve::dupv: "Duplicate variable θ found in NDSolve[<<1>>]."
I have also tried
Nsol2 = ParametricNDSolve[
sys, T11[0] == 1, T12[0] == 0, T21[0] == 0, T22[0] == 1,
T11, T12, T21, T22,
θ, 0, 2 Pi,
λ
];
which gives me as output $T_11,dots,T_22$ as ParametricFunctions depending on each other and on $lambda$.
I don't know if this is the right approach and, if so, how to extract a numeric expression depending on $lambda$ from the last output - all that I've seen in the documentation are examples that are plotted for specific values of the parameter. Any help is much appreciated.
EDIT
Following the comments in one of the answers I'd like to explain further: the output that I would like to obtain is some sort of function depending of the parameter $lambda$ that I can manipulate afterwards. Say for instance, computing the series expansion of powers of $lambda$ of my solution. I don't know how to treat the ParametricFunction that I obtain to do such computations.
differential-equations numerical-integration
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I would like to solve a $2times 2$ system of the form
$$fracddthetaT=TA,quad T(0)=Id$$
where $theta$ is real and $A$ is of the form
$$A=beginpmatrix 0 & frace^-i thetalambda\ frac136e^-ithetaleft(9lambda + 2(lambda-1)^2 (6costheta + cos2theta + 6)right) & 0endpmatrix,$$
with $lambda$ a free parameter in the unit circle.
In particular I'm interested in obtaining numeric solutions at $theta=2pi$ depending on the extra parameter $lambda$. I'm fairly new using Mathematica, and this is what I have tried so far:
T[θ_] = T11[θ], T12[θ], T21[θ], T22[θ];
A[θ_] =
0, E^(-I θ)/λ,
1/36 E^(-I θ) (9 λ + 2 (-1 + λ)^2 (6 + 6 Cos[θ] + Cos[2 θ])), 0
;
sys = T'[θ] == T[θ].A[θ];
The previous code sets the system that I want to solve and now I try to solve numerically. First I've tried
NSol = NDSolve[
sys, T11[0] == 1, T12[0] == 0, T21[0] == 0, T22[0] == 1,
T11[θ], T12[θ], T21[θ], T22[θ],
θ,
θ, 0, 2 Pi
];
which gives me the output
NDSolve::dupv: "Duplicate variable θ found in NDSolve[<<1>>]."
I have also tried
Nsol2 = ParametricNDSolve[
sys, T11[0] == 1, T12[0] == 0, T21[0] == 0, T22[0] == 1,
T11, T12, T21, T22,
θ, 0, 2 Pi,
λ
];
which gives me as output $T_11,dots,T_22$ as ParametricFunctions depending on each other and on $lambda$.
I don't know if this is the right approach and, if so, how to extract a numeric expression depending on $lambda$ from the last output - all that I've seen in the documentation are examples that are plotted for specific values of the parameter. Any help is much appreciated.
EDIT
Following the comments in one of the answers I'd like to explain further: the output that I would like to obtain is some sort of function depending of the parameter $lambda$ that I can manipulate afterwards. Say for instance, computing the series expansion of powers of $lambda$ of my solution. I don't know how to treat the ParametricFunction that I obtain to do such computations.
differential-equations numerical-integration
$endgroup$
I would like to solve a $2times 2$ system of the form
$$fracddthetaT=TA,quad T(0)=Id$$
where $theta$ is real and $A$ is of the form
$$A=beginpmatrix 0 & frace^-i thetalambda\ frac136e^-ithetaleft(9lambda + 2(lambda-1)^2 (6costheta + cos2theta + 6)right) & 0endpmatrix,$$
with $lambda$ a free parameter in the unit circle.
In particular I'm interested in obtaining numeric solutions at $theta=2pi$ depending on the extra parameter $lambda$. I'm fairly new using Mathematica, and this is what I have tried so far:
T[θ_] = T11[θ], T12[θ], T21[θ], T22[θ];
A[θ_] =
0, E^(-I θ)/λ,
1/36 E^(-I θ) (9 λ + 2 (-1 + λ)^2 (6 + 6 Cos[θ] + Cos[2 θ])), 0
;
sys = T'[θ] == T[θ].A[θ];
The previous code sets the system that I want to solve and now I try to solve numerically. First I've tried
NSol = NDSolve[
sys, T11[0] == 1, T12[0] == 0, T21[0] == 0, T22[0] == 1,
T11[θ], T12[θ], T21[θ], T22[θ],
θ,
θ, 0, 2 Pi
];
which gives me the output
NDSolve::dupv: "Duplicate variable θ found in NDSolve[<<1>>]."
I have also tried
Nsol2 = ParametricNDSolve[
sys, T11[0] == 1, T12[0] == 0, T21[0] == 0, T22[0] == 1,
T11, T12, T21, T22,
θ, 0, 2 Pi,
λ
];
which gives me as output $T_11,dots,T_22$ as ParametricFunctions depending on each other and on $lambda$.
I don't know if this is the right approach and, if so, how to extract a numeric expression depending on $lambda$ from the last output - all that I've seen in the documentation are examples that are plotted for specific values of the parameter. Any help is much appreciated.
EDIT
Following the comments in one of the answers I'd like to explain further: the output that I would like to obtain is some sort of function depending of the parameter $lambda$ that I can manipulate afterwards. Say for instance, computing the series expansion of powers of $lambda$ of my solution. I don't know how to treat the ParametricFunction that I obtain to do such computations.
differential-equations numerical-integration
differential-equations numerical-integration
edited Mar 30 at 19:56
Carl Woll
73.4k398192
73.4k398192
asked Mar 30 at 13:31
EduEdu
1476
1476
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here is how to obtain the series expansion of the matrix components. First, using a tweaked version (solving for t[2π]
instead of t
) of JM's formulation:
A[θ_] =
0, E^(-I θ)/λ,
1/36 E^(-I θ) (9 λ + 2 (-1 + λ)^2 (6 + 6 Cos[θ] + Cos[2 θ])), 0
;
pf = ParametricNDSolveValue[
t'[θ] == t[θ].A[θ], t[0] == IdentityMatrix[2]
,
t[2π],
θ, 0, 2π,
λ
];
Then, pf
will return the matrix value at $theta = 2 pi$. For example:
pf[1]
pf[Exp[I Pi/3]]
1. + 3.62818*10^-9 I,
6.82646*10^-8 - 5.73536*10^-9 I, 1.70661*10^-8 - 1.43384*10^-9 I,
1. + 3.62818*10^-9 I
0.985595 + 1.17074 I, -0.425572 + 0.737112 I, -0.788363 - 1.36549 I,
0.985595 - 1.17074 I
Finding the series expansion is simple:
DecimalForm[Series[pf[λ], λ, 1, 5], 4,4] //TeXForm
$left(
beginarraycc
1.0000 & 6.2830 \
1.5710 & 1.0000 \
endarray
right)+left(
beginarraycc
0.0000+0.0000 i & -6.2830+0.0000 i \
1.5710+0.0000 i & 0.0000+0.0000 i \
endarray
right) (lambda -1)+left(
beginarraycc
0.0000-0.7869 i & 0.6691-0.0000 i \
0.8799+0.0000 i & -0.0000+0.7869 i \
endarray
right) (lambda -1)^2+left(
beginarraycc
0.0000+0.7869 i & -1.3380+0.0000 i \
0.0000+0.0000 i & 0.0000-0.7869 i \
endarray
right) (lambda -1)^3+left(
beginarraycc
-0.0152-0.4524 i & 1.8410-0.0000 i \
-0.5708-0.0000 i & -0.0152+0.4524 i \
endarray
right) (lambda -1)^4+left(
beginarraycc
0.0305+0.1179 i & -2.1780+0.0000 i \
0.5708-0.0000 i & 0.0305-0.1179 i \
endarray
right) (lambda -1)^5+Oleft((lambda -1)^6right)$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As far as I can tell, you did everything right in your second approach. Classically, Mathematica returns lists of rules as results of solving functions, but in this case, I find this tradition rather confusing and prefer to use ParametricNDSolveValue
; it returns a ParametricFunction
object that, when applied to a numerical parameter, returns a list of 4 InterpolatingFunction
for your 4 functions.
T[θ_] = T11[θ], T12[θ], T21[θ], T22[θ];
A[θ_] = 0, E^(-I θ)/λ, 1/36 E^(-I θ) (9 λ + 2 (-1 + λ)^2 (6 + 6 Cos[θ] + Cos[2 θ])), 0;
sys = T'[θ] == T[θ].A[θ];
Tsol = ParametricNDSolveValue[sys, T11[0] == 1, T12[0] == 0,
T21[0] == 0, T22[0] == 1,
T11, T12, T21, T22,
θ, 0, 2 Pi,
λ
];
In order to obtain the numerical values for all the solutions at θ = 2 Pi
for a given parameter, say λ = 0.1
, you may use Through
:
Through[Tsol[0.1][2. Pi]]
-0.545795 + 1.00532 I, -1.43497 - 7.95125*10^-7 I, -0.215035 -
2.80298*10^-8 I, -0.545795 - 1.00532 I
In order to make that into a function, you may use
f = λ [Function] Through[Tsol[λ][2. Pi]]
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer. Only the last step differs from what I'd like to obtain. What I would like to see is a function depending on $lambda$, not the evaluation at a single point.
$endgroup$
– Edu
Mar 30 at 14:17
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For this case, you don't even need to write out the components of your matrix function:
pf = ParametricNDSolveValue[t'[θ] == t[θ].0, Exp[-I θ]/λ,
Exp[-I θ] (9 λ + 2 (λ - 1)^2
(6 Cos[θ] + Cos[2 θ] + 6))/36, 0,
t[0] == IdentityMatrix[2], t, θ, 0, 2 π, λ,
Method -> "StiffnessSwitching"];
sol = pf[(3 + 4 I)/5];
ParametricPlot[ReIm[Tr[sol[θ]]], θ, 0, 2 π]
ParametricPlot[ReIm[Det[sol[θ]]], θ, 0, 2 π]
You can even make a plot where the parameter is varying:
Plot[Re[Tr[pf[Exp[I ϕ]][2 π]]], ϕ, 0, 2 π]
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer. Could I see the solution as a function of $lambda$ instead? I suppose is something possible to do...
$endgroup$
– Edu
Mar 30 at 14:23
$begingroup$
That is what the third plot is; I let $lambda=exp(ivarphi)$ (quote "with $lambda$ a free parameter in the unit circle") and plotted the real part of the trace of the matrix.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is away♦
Mar 30 at 14:24
$begingroup$
Sure, but I'd like to manipulate it further. Not just see its plot. See my point?
$endgroup$
– Edu
Mar 30 at 14:26
$begingroup$
You make no mention of what kind of manipulations you like to do in your question, so no, I do not see.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is away♦
Mar 30 at 14:26
$begingroup$
For example, can I get the solution as a function of $lambda$? Or as a series expansion of powers of $lambda$?
$endgroup$
– Edu
Mar 30 at 14:41
|
show 1 more comment
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "387"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194251%2fsolving-system-of-odes-with-extra-parameter%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here is how to obtain the series expansion of the matrix components. First, using a tweaked version (solving for t[2π]
instead of t
) of JM's formulation:
A[θ_] =
0, E^(-I θ)/λ,
1/36 E^(-I θ) (9 λ + 2 (-1 + λ)^2 (6 + 6 Cos[θ] + Cos[2 θ])), 0
;
pf = ParametricNDSolveValue[
t'[θ] == t[θ].A[θ], t[0] == IdentityMatrix[2]
,
t[2π],
θ, 0, 2π,
λ
];
Then, pf
will return the matrix value at $theta = 2 pi$. For example:
pf[1]
pf[Exp[I Pi/3]]
1. + 3.62818*10^-9 I,
6.82646*10^-8 - 5.73536*10^-9 I, 1.70661*10^-8 - 1.43384*10^-9 I,
1. + 3.62818*10^-9 I
0.985595 + 1.17074 I, -0.425572 + 0.737112 I, -0.788363 - 1.36549 I,
0.985595 - 1.17074 I
Finding the series expansion is simple:
DecimalForm[Series[pf[λ], λ, 1, 5], 4,4] //TeXForm
$left(
beginarraycc
1.0000 & 6.2830 \
1.5710 & 1.0000 \
endarray
right)+left(
beginarraycc
0.0000+0.0000 i & -6.2830+0.0000 i \
1.5710+0.0000 i & 0.0000+0.0000 i \
endarray
right) (lambda -1)+left(
beginarraycc
0.0000-0.7869 i & 0.6691-0.0000 i \
0.8799+0.0000 i & -0.0000+0.7869 i \
endarray
right) (lambda -1)^2+left(
beginarraycc
0.0000+0.7869 i & -1.3380+0.0000 i \
0.0000+0.0000 i & 0.0000-0.7869 i \
endarray
right) (lambda -1)^3+left(
beginarraycc
-0.0152-0.4524 i & 1.8410-0.0000 i \
-0.5708-0.0000 i & -0.0152+0.4524 i \
endarray
right) (lambda -1)^4+left(
beginarraycc
0.0305+0.1179 i & -2.1780+0.0000 i \
0.5708-0.0000 i & 0.0305-0.1179 i \
endarray
right) (lambda -1)^5+Oleft((lambda -1)^6right)$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is how to obtain the series expansion of the matrix components. First, using a tweaked version (solving for t[2π]
instead of t
) of JM's formulation:
A[θ_] =
0, E^(-I θ)/λ,
1/36 E^(-I θ) (9 λ + 2 (-1 + λ)^2 (6 + 6 Cos[θ] + Cos[2 θ])), 0
;
pf = ParametricNDSolveValue[
t'[θ] == t[θ].A[θ], t[0] == IdentityMatrix[2]
,
t[2π],
θ, 0, 2π,
λ
];
Then, pf
will return the matrix value at $theta = 2 pi$. For example:
pf[1]
pf[Exp[I Pi/3]]
1. + 3.62818*10^-9 I,
6.82646*10^-8 - 5.73536*10^-9 I, 1.70661*10^-8 - 1.43384*10^-9 I,
1. + 3.62818*10^-9 I
0.985595 + 1.17074 I, -0.425572 + 0.737112 I, -0.788363 - 1.36549 I,
0.985595 - 1.17074 I
Finding the series expansion is simple:
DecimalForm[Series[pf[λ], λ, 1, 5], 4,4] //TeXForm
$left(
beginarraycc
1.0000 & 6.2830 \
1.5710 & 1.0000 \
endarray
right)+left(
beginarraycc
0.0000+0.0000 i & -6.2830+0.0000 i \
1.5710+0.0000 i & 0.0000+0.0000 i \
endarray
right) (lambda -1)+left(
beginarraycc
0.0000-0.7869 i & 0.6691-0.0000 i \
0.8799+0.0000 i & -0.0000+0.7869 i \
endarray
right) (lambda -1)^2+left(
beginarraycc
0.0000+0.7869 i & -1.3380+0.0000 i \
0.0000+0.0000 i & 0.0000-0.7869 i \
endarray
right) (lambda -1)^3+left(
beginarraycc
-0.0152-0.4524 i & 1.8410-0.0000 i \
-0.5708-0.0000 i & -0.0152+0.4524 i \
endarray
right) (lambda -1)^4+left(
beginarraycc
0.0305+0.1179 i & -2.1780+0.0000 i \
0.5708-0.0000 i & 0.0305-0.1179 i \
endarray
right) (lambda -1)^5+Oleft((lambda -1)^6right)$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is how to obtain the series expansion of the matrix components. First, using a tweaked version (solving for t[2π]
instead of t
) of JM's formulation:
A[θ_] =
0, E^(-I θ)/λ,
1/36 E^(-I θ) (9 λ + 2 (-1 + λ)^2 (6 + 6 Cos[θ] + Cos[2 θ])), 0
;
pf = ParametricNDSolveValue[
t'[θ] == t[θ].A[θ], t[0] == IdentityMatrix[2]
,
t[2π],
θ, 0, 2π,
λ
];
Then, pf
will return the matrix value at $theta = 2 pi$. For example:
pf[1]
pf[Exp[I Pi/3]]
1. + 3.62818*10^-9 I,
6.82646*10^-8 - 5.73536*10^-9 I, 1.70661*10^-8 - 1.43384*10^-9 I,
1. + 3.62818*10^-9 I
0.985595 + 1.17074 I, -0.425572 + 0.737112 I, -0.788363 - 1.36549 I,
0.985595 - 1.17074 I
Finding the series expansion is simple:
DecimalForm[Series[pf[λ], λ, 1, 5], 4,4] //TeXForm
$left(
beginarraycc
1.0000 & 6.2830 \
1.5710 & 1.0000 \
endarray
right)+left(
beginarraycc
0.0000+0.0000 i & -6.2830+0.0000 i \
1.5710+0.0000 i & 0.0000+0.0000 i \
endarray
right) (lambda -1)+left(
beginarraycc
0.0000-0.7869 i & 0.6691-0.0000 i \
0.8799+0.0000 i & -0.0000+0.7869 i \
endarray
right) (lambda -1)^2+left(
beginarraycc
0.0000+0.7869 i & -1.3380+0.0000 i \
0.0000+0.0000 i & 0.0000-0.7869 i \
endarray
right) (lambda -1)^3+left(
beginarraycc
-0.0152-0.4524 i & 1.8410-0.0000 i \
-0.5708-0.0000 i & -0.0152+0.4524 i \
endarray
right) (lambda -1)^4+left(
beginarraycc
0.0305+0.1179 i & -2.1780+0.0000 i \
0.5708-0.0000 i & 0.0305-0.1179 i \
endarray
right) (lambda -1)^5+Oleft((lambda -1)^6right)$
$endgroup$
Here is how to obtain the series expansion of the matrix components. First, using a tweaked version (solving for t[2π]
instead of t
) of JM's formulation:
A[θ_] =
0, E^(-I θ)/λ,
1/36 E^(-I θ) (9 λ + 2 (-1 + λ)^2 (6 + 6 Cos[θ] + Cos[2 θ])), 0
;
pf = ParametricNDSolveValue[
t'[θ] == t[θ].A[θ], t[0] == IdentityMatrix[2]
,
t[2π],
θ, 0, 2π,
λ
];
Then, pf
will return the matrix value at $theta = 2 pi$. For example:
pf[1]
pf[Exp[I Pi/3]]
1. + 3.62818*10^-9 I,
6.82646*10^-8 - 5.73536*10^-9 I, 1.70661*10^-8 - 1.43384*10^-9 I,
1. + 3.62818*10^-9 I
0.985595 + 1.17074 I, -0.425572 + 0.737112 I, -0.788363 - 1.36549 I,
0.985595 - 1.17074 I
Finding the series expansion is simple:
DecimalForm[Series[pf[λ], λ, 1, 5], 4,4] //TeXForm
$left(
beginarraycc
1.0000 & 6.2830 \
1.5710 & 1.0000 \
endarray
right)+left(
beginarraycc
0.0000+0.0000 i & -6.2830+0.0000 i \
1.5710+0.0000 i & 0.0000+0.0000 i \
endarray
right) (lambda -1)+left(
beginarraycc
0.0000-0.7869 i & 0.6691-0.0000 i \
0.8799+0.0000 i & -0.0000+0.7869 i \
endarray
right) (lambda -1)^2+left(
beginarraycc
0.0000+0.7869 i & -1.3380+0.0000 i \
0.0000+0.0000 i & 0.0000-0.7869 i \
endarray
right) (lambda -1)^3+left(
beginarraycc
-0.0152-0.4524 i & 1.8410-0.0000 i \
-0.5708-0.0000 i & -0.0152+0.4524 i \
endarray
right) (lambda -1)^4+left(
beginarraycc
0.0305+0.1179 i & -2.1780+0.0000 i \
0.5708-0.0000 i & 0.0305-0.1179 i \
endarray
right) (lambda -1)^5+Oleft((lambda -1)^6right)$
answered Mar 30 at 18:58
Carl WollCarl Woll
73.4k398192
73.4k398192
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As far as I can tell, you did everything right in your second approach. Classically, Mathematica returns lists of rules as results of solving functions, but in this case, I find this tradition rather confusing and prefer to use ParametricNDSolveValue
; it returns a ParametricFunction
object that, when applied to a numerical parameter, returns a list of 4 InterpolatingFunction
for your 4 functions.
T[θ_] = T11[θ], T12[θ], T21[θ], T22[θ];
A[θ_] = 0, E^(-I θ)/λ, 1/36 E^(-I θ) (9 λ + 2 (-1 + λ)^2 (6 + 6 Cos[θ] + Cos[2 θ])), 0;
sys = T'[θ] == T[θ].A[θ];
Tsol = ParametricNDSolveValue[sys, T11[0] == 1, T12[0] == 0,
T21[0] == 0, T22[0] == 1,
T11, T12, T21, T22,
θ, 0, 2 Pi,
λ
];
In order to obtain the numerical values for all the solutions at θ = 2 Pi
for a given parameter, say λ = 0.1
, you may use Through
:
Through[Tsol[0.1][2. Pi]]
-0.545795 + 1.00532 I, -1.43497 - 7.95125*10^-7 I, -0.215035 -
2.80298*10^-8 I, -0.545795 - 1.00532 I
In order to make that into a function, you may use
f = λ [Function] Through[Tsol[λ][2. Pi]]
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer. Only the last step differs from what I'd like to obtain. What I would like to see is a function depending on $lambda$, not the evaluation at a single point.
$endgroup$
– Edu
Mar 30 at 14:17
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As far as I can tell, you did everything right in your second approach. Classically, Mathematica returns lists of rules as results of solving functions, but in this case, I find this tradition rather confusing and prefer to use ParametricNDSolveValue
; it returns a ParametricFunction
object that, when applied to a numerical parameter, returns a list of 4 InterpolatingFunction
for your 4 functions.
T[θ_] = T11[θ], T12[θ], T21[θ], T22[θ];
A[θ_] = 0, E^(-I θ)/λ, 1/36 E^(-I θ) (9 λ + 2 (-1 + λ)^2 (6 + 6 Cos[θ] + Cos[2 θ])), 0;
sys = T'[θ] == T[θ].A[θ];
Tsol = ParametricNDSolveValue[sys, T11[0] == 1, T12[0] == 0,
T21[0] == 0, T22[0] == 1,
T11, T12, T21, T22,
θ, 0, 2 Pi,
λ
];
In order to obtain the numerical values for all the solutions at θ = 2 Pi
for a given parameter, say λ = 0.1
, you may use Through
:
Through[Tsol[0.1][2. Pi]]
-0.545795 + 1.00532 I, -1.43497 - 7.95125*10^-7 I, -0.215035 -
2.80298*10^-8 I, -0.545795 - 1.00532 I
In order to make that into a function, you may use
f = λ [Function] Through[Tsol[λ][2. Pi]]
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer. Only the last step differs from what I'd like to obtain. What I would like to see is a function depending on $lambda$, not the evaluation at a single point.
$endgroup$
– Edu
Mar 30 at 14:17
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As far as I can tell, you did everything right in your second approach. Classically, Mathematica returns lists of rules as results of solving functions, but in this case, I find this tradition rather confusing and prefer to use ParametricNDSolveValue
; it returns a ParametricFunction
object that, when applied to a numerical parameter, returns a list of 4 InterpolatingFunction
for your 4 functions.
T[θ_] = T11[θ], T12[θ], T21[θ], T22[θ];
A[θ_] = 0, E^(-I θ)/λ, 1/36 E^(-I θ) (9 λ + 2 (-1 + λ)^2 (6 + 6 Cos[θ] + Cos[2 θ])), 0;
sys = T'[θ] == T[θ].A[θ];
Tsol = ParametricNDSolveValue[sys, T11[0] == 1, T12[0] == 0,
T21[0] == 0, T22[0] == 1,
T11, T12, T21, T22,
θ, 0, 2 Pi,
λ
];
In order to obtain the numerical values for all the solutions at θ = 2 Pi
for a given parameter, say λ = 0.1
, you may use Through
:
Through[Tsol[0.1][2. Pi]]
-0.545795 + 1.00532 I, -1.43497 - 7.95125*10^-7 I, -0.215035 -
2.80298*10^-8 I, -0.545795 - 1.00532 I
In order to make that into a function, you may use
f = λ [Function] Through[Tsol[λ][2. Pi]]
$endgroup$
As far as I can tell, you did everything right in your second approach. Classically, Mathematica returns lists of rules as results of solving functions, but in this case, I find this tradition rather confusing and prefer to use ParametricNDSolveValue
; it returns a ParametricFunction
object that, when applied to a numerical parameter, returns a list of 4 InterpolatingFunction
for your 4 functions.
T[θ_] = T11[θ], T12[θ], T21[θ], T22[θ];
A[θ_] = 0, E^(-I θ)/λ, 1/36 E^(-I θ) (9 λ + 2 (-1 + λ)^2 (6 + 6 Cos[θ] + Cos[2 θ])), 0;
sys = T'[θ] == T[θ].A[θ];
Tsol = ParametricNDSolveValue[sys, T11[0] == 1, T12[0] == 0,
T21[0] == 0, T22[0] == 1,
T11, T12, T21, T22,
θ, 0, 2 Pi,
λ
];
In order to obtain the numerical values for all the solutions at θ = 2 Pi
for a given parameter, say λ = 0.1
, you may use Through
:
Through[Tsol[0.1][2. Pi]]
-0.545795 + 1.00532 I, -1.43497 - 7.95125*10^-7 I, -0.215035 -
2.80298*10^-8 I, -0.545795 - 1.00532 I
In order to make that into a function, you may use
f = λ [Function] Through[Tsol[λ][2. Pi]]
edited Mar 30 at 14:25
answered Mar 30 at 13:47
Henrik SchumacherHenrik Schumacher
59.8k582166
59.8k582166
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer. Only the last step differs from what I'd like to obtain. What I would like to see is a function depending on $lambda$, not the evaluation at a single point.
$endgroup$
– Edu
Mar 30 at 14:17
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer. Only the last step differs from what I'd like to obtain. What I would like to see is a function depending on $lambda$, not the evaluation at a single point.
$endgroup$
– Edu
Mar 30 at 14:17
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer. Only the last step differs from what I'd like to obtain. What I would like to see is a function depending on $lambda$, not the evaluation at a single point.
$endgroup$
– Edu
Mar 30 at 14:17
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer. Only the last step differs from what I'd like to obtain. What I would like to see is a function depending on $lambda$, not the evaluation at a single point.
$endgroup$
– Edu
Mar 30 at 14:17
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For this case, you don't even need to write out the components of your matrix function:
pf = ParametricNDSolveValue[t'[θ] == t[θ].0, Exp[-I θ]/λ,
Exp[-I θ] (9 λ + 2 (λ - 1)^2
(6 Cos[θ] + Cos[2 θ] + 6))/36, 0,
t[0] == IdentityMatrix[2], t, θ, 0, 2 π, λ,
Method -> "StiffnessSwitching"];
sol = pf[(3 + 4 I)/5];
ParametricPlot[ReIm[Tr[sol[θ]]], θ, 0, 2 π]
ParametricPlot[ReIm[Det[sol[θ]]], θ, 0, 2 π]
You can even make a plot where the parameter is varying:
Plot[Re[Tr[pf[Exp[I ϕ]][2 π]]], ϕ, 0, 2 π]
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer. Could I see the solution as a function of $lambda$ instead? I suppose is something possible to do...
$endgroup$
– Edu
Mar 30 at 14:23
$begingroup$
That is what the third plot is; I let $lambda=exp(ivarphi)$ (quote "with $lambda$ a free parameter in the unit circle") and plotted the real part of the trace of the matrix.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is away♦
Mar 30 at 14:24
$begingroup$
Sure, but I'd like to manipulate it further. Not just see its plot. See my point?
$endgroup$
– Edu
Mar 30 at 14:26
$begingroup$
You make no mention of what kind of manipulations you like to do in your question, so no, I do not see.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is away♦
Mar 30 at 14:26
$begingroup$
For example, can I get the solution as a function of $lambda$? Or as a series expansion of powers of $lambda$?
$endgroup$
– Edu
Mar 30 at 14:41
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
For this case, you don't even need to write out the components of your matrix function:
pf = ParametricNDSolveValue[t'[θ] == t[θ].0, Exp[-I θ]/λ,
Exp[-I θ] (9 λ + 2 (λ - 1)^2
(6 Cos[θ] + Cos[2 θ] + 6))/36, 0,
t[0] == IdentityMatrix[2], t, θ, 0, 2 π, λ,
Method -> "StiffnessSwitching"];
sol = pf[(3 + 4 I)/5];
ParametricPlot[ReIm[Tr[sol[θ]]], θ, 0, 2 π]
ParametricPlot[ReIm[Det[sol[θ]]], θ, 0, 2 π]
You can even make a plot where the parameter is varying:
Plot[Re[Tr[pf[Exp[I ϕ]][2 π]]], ϕ, 0, 2 π]
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer. Could I see the solution as a function of $lambda$ instead? I suppose is something possible to do...
$endgroup$
– Edu
Mar 30 at 14:23
$begingroup$
That is what the third plot is; I let $lambda=exp(ivarphi)$ (quote "with $lambda$ a free parameter in the unit circle") and plotted the real part of the trace of the matrix.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is away♦
Mar 30 at 14:24
$begingroup$
Sure, but I'd like to manipulate it further. Not just see its plot. See my point?
$endgroup$
– Edu
Mar 30 at 14:26
$begingroup$
You make no mention of what kind of manipulations you like to do in your question, so no, I do not see.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is away♦
Mar 30 at 14:26
$begingroup$
For example, can I get the solution as a function of $lambda$? Or as a series expansion of powers of $lambda$?
$endgroup$
– Edu
Mar 30 at 14:41
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
For this case, you don't even need to write out the components of your matrix function:
pf = ParametricNDSolveValue[t'[θ] == t[θ].0, Exp[-I θ]/λ,
Exp[-I θ] (9 λ + 2 (λ - 1)^2
(6 Cos[θ] + Cos[2 θ] + 6))/36, 0,
t[0] == IdentityMatrix[2], t, θ, 0, 2 π, λ,
Method -> "StiffnessSwitching"];
sol = pf[(3 + 4 I)/5];
ParametricPlot[ReIm[Tr[sol[θ]]], θ, 0, 2 π]
ParametricPlot[ReIm[Det[sol[θ]]], θ, 0, 2 π]
You can even make a plot where the parameter is varying:
Plot[Re[Tr[pf[Exp[I ϕ]][2 π]]], ϕ, 0, 2 π]
$endgroup$
For this case, you don't even need to write out the components of your matrix function:
pf = ParametricNDSolveValue[t'[θ] == t[θ].0, Exp[-I θ]/λ,
Exp[-I θ] (9 λ + 2 (λ - 1)^2
(6 Cos[θ] + Cos[2 θ] + 6))/36, 0,
t[0] == IdentityMatrix[2], t, θ, 0, 2 π, λ,
Method -> "StiffnessSwitching"];
sol = pf[(3 + 4 I)/5];
ParametricPlot[ReIm[Tr[sol[θ]]], θ, 0, 2 π]
ParametricPlot[ReIm[Det[sol[θ]]], θ, 0, 2 π]
You can even make a plot where the parameter is varying:
Plot[Re[Tr[pf[Exp[I ϕ]][2 π]]], ϕ, 0, 2 π]
answered Mar 30 at 13:57
community wiki
J. M. is away
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer. Could I see the solution as a function of $lambda$ instead? I suppose is something possible to do...
$endgroup$
– Edu
Mar 30 at 14:23
$begingroup$
That is what the third plot is; I let $lambda=exp(ivarphi)$ (quote "with $lambda$ a free parameter in the unit circle") and plotted the real part of the trace of the matrix.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is away♦
Mar 30 at 14:24
$begingroup$
Sure, but I'd like to manipulate it further. Not just see its plot. See my point?
$endgroup$
– Edu
Mar 30 at 14:26
$begingroup$
You make no mention of what kind of manipulations you like to do in your question, so no, I do not see.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is away♦
Mar 30 at 14:26
$begingroup$
For example, can I get the solution as a function of $lambda$? Or as a series expansion of powers of $lambda$?
$endgroup$
– Edu
Mar 30 at 14:41
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer. Could I see the solution as a function of $lambda$ instead? I suppose is something possible to do...
$endgroup$
– Edu
Mar 30 at 14:23
$begingroup$
That is what the third plot is; I let $lambda=exp(ivarphi)$ (quote "with $lambda$ a free parameter in the unit circle") and plotted the real part of the trace of the matrix.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is away♦
Mar 30 at 14:24
$begingroup$
Sure, but I'd like to manipulate it further. Not just see its plot. See my point?
$endgroup$
– Edu
Mar 30 at 14:26
$begingroup$
You make no mention of what kind of manipulations you like to do in your question, so no, I do not see.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is away♦
Mar 30 at 14:26
$begingroup$
For example, can I get the solution as a function of $lambda$? Or as a series expansion of powers of $lambda$?
$endgroup$
– Edu
Mar 30 at 14:41
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer. Could I see the solution as a function of $lambda$ instead? I suppose is something possible to do...
$endgroup$
– Edu
Mar 30 at 14:23
$begingroup$
Thanks for your answer. Could I see the solution as a function of $lambda$ instead? I suppose is something possible to do...
$endgroup$
– Edu
Mar 30 at 14:23
$begingroup$
That is what the third plot is; I let $lambda=exp(ivarphi)$ (quote "with $lambda$ a free parameter in the unit circle") and plotted the real part of the trace of the matrix.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is away♦
Mar 30 at 14:24
$begingroup$
That is what the third plot is; I let $lambda=exp(ivarphi)$ (quote "with $lambda$ a free parameter in the unit circle") and plotted the real part of the trace of the matrix.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is away♦
Mar 30 at 14:24
$begingroup$
Sure, but I'd like to manipulate it further. Not just see its plot. See my point?
$endgroup$
– Edu
Mar 30 at 14:26
$begingroup$
Sure, but I'd like to manipulate it further. Not just see its plot. See my point?
$endgroup$
– Edu
Mar 30 at 14:26
$begingroup$
You make no mention of what kind of manipulations you like to do in your question, so no, I do not see.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is away♦
Mar 30 at 14:26
$begingroup$
You make no mention of what kind of manipulations you like to do in your question, so no, I do not see.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is away♦
Mar 30 at 14:26
$begingroup$
For example, can I get the solution as a function of $lambda$? Or as a series expansion of powers of $lambda$?
$endgroup$
– Edu
Mar 30 at 14:41
$begingroup$
For example, can I get the solution as a function of $lambda$? Or as a series expansion of powers of $lambda$?
$endgroup$
– Edu
Mar 30 at 14:41
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194251%2fsolving-system-of-odes-with-extra-parameter%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown