Story Tag Prediction - Optional LabelsAdd Custom Labels to NLTK Information Extractorngram and RNN prediction rate wrt word indexHow to train NLTK Sequence labeling algorithm for using custom labels/Train set?Sentence similarity predictionHow can I find contextually related words and classify into custom tags/labels?How to classify features into two classes without labels?Creating labels for Text classification using kerasHow to auto tag textsHow do you measure performance for word prediction tasks?how to extract the Top contributing labels/words in universal-sentence-encoder-large - TransformerModel?
Timing of New Changes in Change Sets
Why wasn't the Night King naked in S08E03?
I caught several of my students plagiarizing. Could it be my fault as a teacher?
Why do money exchangers give different rates to different bills?
How encryption in SQL login authentication works
Moving the subject of the sentence into a dangling participle
Understanding trademark infringements in a world where many dictionary words are trademarks?
What does this colon mean? It is not labeling, it is not ternary operator
What is Shri Venkateshwara Mangalasasana stotram recited for?
How long would it take for people to notice a mass disappearance?
Randomness of Python's random
Is Cola "probably the best-known" Latin word in the world? If not, which might it be?
Independent, post-Brexit Scotland - would there be a hard border with England?
Why is Arya visibly scared in the library in S8E3?
Point of the the Dothraki's attack in GoT S8E3?
I need a disease
Roll Dice to get a random number between 1 and 150
Can I get a paladin's steed by True Polymorphing into a monster that can cast Find Steed?
When does a player choose the creature benefiting from Amass?
Enumerate Derangements
BOOM! Perfect Clear for Mr. T
Selecting a secure PIN for building access
Filling cracks with epoxy after Tung oil
What are the spoon bit of a spoon and fork bit of a fork called?
Story Tag Prediction - Optional Labels
Add Custom Labels to NLTK Information Extractorngram and RNN prediction rate wrt word indexHow to train NLTK Sequence labeling algorithm for using custom labels/Train set?Sentence similarity predictionHow can I find contextually related words and classify into custom tags/labels?How to classify features into two classes without labels?Creating labels for Text classification using kerasHow to auto tag textsHow do you measure performance for word prediction tasks?how to extract the Top contributing labels/words in universal-sentence-encoder-large - TransformerModel?
$begingroup$
I'm currently working on a prediction for fiction. I have a database with fiction, which are each described with different story tags. My idea is to use a neural network that can tell you by processing a new story which tags are relevant.
The problem is, that the original data wasn't generated but added by users. A story in the woods could be tagged with trees, nature etc. Another story that also takes place in the woods might not be tagged with nature, even though the tag applies. This might confuse the neural network. Is there a way to prevent this form happening?
Thank you!
nlp
asked Apr 9 at 13:46
JoschJavaJoschJava
61
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm currently working on a prediction for fiction. I have a database with fiction, which are each described with different story tags. My idea is to use a neural network that can tell you by processing a new story which tags are relevant.
The problem is, that the original data wasn't generated but added by users. A story in the woods could be tagged with trees, nature etc. Another story that also takes place in the woods might not be tagged with nature, even though the tag applies. This might confuse the neural network. Is there a way to prevent this form happening?
Thank you!
nlp
asked Apr 9 at 13:46
JoschJavaJoschJava
61
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Are you aiming at multi-label classification?
$endgroup$
– pythinker
Apr 9 at 16:30
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm currently working on a prediction for fiction. I have a database with fiction, which are each described with different story tags. My idea is to use a neural network that can tell you by processing a new story which tags are relevant.
The problem is, that the original data wasn't generated but added by users. A story in the woods could be tagged with trees, nature etc. Another story that also takes place in the woods might not be tagged with nature, even though the tag applies. This might confuse the neural network. Is there a way to prevent this form happening?
Thank you!
nlp
asked Apr 9 at 13:46
JoschJavaJoschJava
61
$endgroup$
I'm currently working on a prediction for fiction. I have a database with fiction, which are each described with different story tags. My idea is to use a neural network that can tell you by processing a new story which tags are relevant.
The problem is, that the original data wasn't generated but added by users. A story in the woods could be tagged with trees, nature etc. Another story that also takes place in the woods might not be tagged with nature, even though the tag applies. This might confuse the neural network. Is there a way to prevent this form happening?
Thank you!
nlp
nlp
asked Apr 9 at 13:46
JoschJavaJoschJava
61
asked Apr 9 at 13:46
JoschJavaJoschJava
61
asked Apr 9 at 13:46
JoschJavaJoschJava
61
asked Apr 9 at 13:46
JoschJavaJoschJava
61
asked Apr 9 at 13:46
JoschJavaJoschJava
61
61
$begingroup$
Are you aiming at multi-label classification?
$endgroup$
– pythinker
Apr 9 at 16:30
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Are you aiming at multi-label classification?
$endgroup$
– pythinker
Apr 9 at 16:30
$begingroup$
Are you aiming at multi-label classification?
$endgroup$
– pythinker
Apr 9 at 16:30
$begingroup$
Are you aiming at multi-label classification?
$endgroup$
– pythinker
Apr 9 at 16:30
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Welcome to our community!
If I understood correctly, you don't trust the labels on your training dataset.
The problem is, that the original data wasn't generated but added by users.
That is not properly a problem, actually almost every dataset was created by human labeling. Your problem is that you don't trust the judgement of those users and you think that data might be incomplete.
It is true that this might affect your model's performance. But, you should try either way. Sometimes the model learns to label even better than the training dataset:
Recently I looked the master's dissertation of a friend (Wesley L. Passos,M.Sc. by UFRJ) which used deep learning to detect tires on drone images (for Aedes Aegyptis prevention procedures). The dataset was created by our group my manually annotating images with bounding boxes and while we missed some of the tires that were pretty well hidden the D-CNN model was capable of detecting those hard subjects.
Note: This dissertation was recently accepted and isn't available online yet. Once it does, I will update this answer with the proper reference.
Since wrangling with data is our everyday job this is a good opportunity for you to put in practice what you have learned:
Clean your data by either removing incomplete samples or filling missing values. This is a common part of our jobs as data scientists.
If you feel that the amount of work is a bit overwhelming you can try clustering instead or semi-supervised methods to speed up the cleaning process.
Also you can try posting your data online for further contributing.
Curiosity Note:
Crowds are usually more intelligent than individual, so with problem statistical treatment data can actually be better annotated by crowds, using mean answers or by voting. Check for The Wisdom of Crowds (Not the TV Show).
answered Apr 9 at 17:47
Pedro Henrique MonfortePedro Henrique Monforte
569219
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "557"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f48966%2fstory-tag-prediction-optional-labels%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Welcome to our community!
If I understood correctly, you don't trust the labels on your training dataset.
The problem is, that the original data wasn't generated but added by users.
That is not properly a problem, actually almost every dataset was created by human labeling. Your problem is that you don't trust the judgement of those users and you think that data might be incomplete.
It is true that this might affect your model's performance. But, you should try either way. Sometimes the model learns to label even better than the training dataset:
Recently I looked the master's dissertation of a friend (Wesley L. Passos,M.Sc. by UFRJ) which used deep learning to detect tires on drone images (for Aedes Aegyptis prevention procedures). The dataset was created by our group my manually annotating images with bounding boxes and while we missed some of the tires that were pretty well hidden the D-CNN model was capable of detecting those hard subjects.
Note: This dissertation was recently accepted and isn't available online yet. Once it does, I will update this answer with the proper reference.
Since wrangling with data is our everyday job this is a good opportunity for you to put in practice what you have learned:
Clean your data by either removing incomplete samples or filling missing values. This is a common part of our jobs as data scientists.
If you feel that the amount of work is a bit overwhelming you can try clustering instead or semi-supervised methods to speed up the cleaning process.
Also you can try posting your data online for further contributing.
Curiosity Note:
Crowds are usually more intelligent than individual, so with problem statistical treatment data can actually be better annotated by crowds, using mean answers or by voting. Check for The Wisdom of Crowds (Not the TV Show).
answered Apr 9 at 17:47
Pedro Henrique MonfortePedro Henrique Monforte
569219
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Welcome to our community!
If I understood correctly, you don't trust the labels on your training dataset.
The problem is, that the original data wasn't generated but added by users.
That is not properly a problem, actually almost every dataset was created by human labeling. Your problem is that you don't trust the judgement of those users and you think that data might be incomplete.
It is true that this might affect your model's performance. But, you should try either way. Sometimes the model learns to label even better than the training dataset:
Recently I looked the master's dissertation of a friend (Wesley L. Passos,M.Sc. by UFRJ) which used deep learning to detect tires on drone images (for Aedes Aegyptis prevention procedures). The dataset was created by our group my manually annotating images with bounding boxes and while we missed some of the tires that were pretty well hidden the D-CNN model was capable of detecting those hard subjects.
Note: This dissertation was recently accepted and isn't available online yet. Once it does, I will update this answer with the proper reference.
Since wrangling with data is our everyday job this is a good opportunity for you to put in practice what you have learned:
Clean your data by either removing incomplete samples or filling missing values. This is a common part of our jobs as data scientists.
If you feel that the amount of work is a bit overwhelming you can try clustering instead or semi-supervised methods to speed up the cleaning process.
Also you can try posting your data online for further contributing.
Curiosity Note:
Crowds are usually more intelligent than individual, so with problem statistical treatment data can actually be better annotated by crowds, using mean answers or by voting. Check for The Wisdom of Crowds (Not the TV Show).
answered Apr 9 at 17:47
Pedro Henrique MonfortePedro Henrique Monforte
569219
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Welcome to our community!
If I understood correctly, you don't trust the labels on your training dataset.
The problem is, that the original data wasn't generated but added by users.
That is not properly a problem, actually almost every dataset was created by human labeling. Your problem is that you don't trust the judgement of those users and you think that data might be incomplete.
It is true that this might affect your model's performance. But, you should try either way. Sometimes the model learns to label even better than the training dataset:
Recently I looked the master's dissertation of a friend (Wesley L. Passos,M.Sc. by UFRJ) which used deep learning to detect tires on drone images (for Aedes Aegyptis prevention procedures). The dataset was created by our group my manually annotating images with bounding boxes and while we missed some of the tires that were pretty well hidden the D-CNN model was capable of detecting those hard subjects.
Note: This dissertation was recently accepted and isn't available online yet. Once it does, I will update this answer with the proper reference.
Since wrangling with data is our everyday job this is a good opportunity for you to put in practice what you have learned:
Clean your data by either removing incomplete samples or filling missing values. This is a common part of our jobs as data scientists.
If you feel that the amount of work is a bit overwhelming you can try clustering instead or semi-supervised methods to speed up the cleaning process.
Also you can try posting your data online for further contributing.
Curiosity Note:
Crowds are usually more intelligent than individual, so with problem statistical treatment data can actually be better annotated by crowds, using mean answers or by voting. Check for The Wisdom of Crowds (Not the TV Show).
answered Apr 9 at 17:47
Pedro Henrique MonfortePedro Henrique Monforte
569219
$endgroup$
Welcome to our community!
If I understood correctly, you don't trust the labels on your training dataset.
The problem is, that the original data wasn't generated but added by users.
That is not properly a problem, actually almost every dataset was created by human labeling. Your problem is that you don't trust the judgement of those users and you think that data might be incomplete.
It is true that this might affect your model's performance. But, you should try either way. Sometimes the model learns to label even better than the training dataset:
Recently I looked the master's dissertation of a friend (Wesley L. Passos,M.Sc. by UFRJ) which used deep learning to detect tires on drone images (for Aedes Aegyptis prevention procedures). The dataset was created by our group my manually annotating images with bounding boxes and while we missed some of the tires that were pretty well hidden the D-CNN model was capable of detecting those hard subjects.
Note: This dissertation was recently accepted and isn't available online yet. Once it does, I will update this answer with the proper reference.
Since wrangling with data is our everyday job this is a good opportunity for you to put in practice what you have learned:
Clean your data by either removing incomplete samples or filling missing values. This is a common part of our jobs as data scientists.
If you feel that the amount of work is a bit overwhelming you can try clustering instead or semi-supervised methods to speed up the cleaning process.
Also you can try posting your data online for further contributing.
Curiosity Note:
Crowds are usually more intelligent than individual, so with problem statistical treatment data can actually be better annotated by crowds, using mean answers or by voting. Check for The Wisdom of Crowds (Not the TV Show).
answered Apr 9 at 17:47
Pedro Henrique MonfortePedro Henrique Monforte
569219
answered Apr 9 at 17:47
Pedro Henrique MonfortePedro Henrique Monforte
569219
answered Apr 9 at 17:47
Pedro Henrique MonfortePedro Henrique Monforte
569219
answered Apr 9 at 17:47
Pedro Henrique MonfortePedro Henrique Monforte
569219
569219
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f48966%2fstory-tag-prediction-optional-labels%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Are you aiming at multi-label classification?
$endgroup$
– pythinker
Apr 9 at 16:30