Compute specificity and sensitivity at certain thresholds The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara 2019 Moderator Election Q&A - Questionnaire 2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsRelationship between VC dimension and degrees of freedomCompute Baseline/Representative of Time-Series DataIs it possible using tensorflow to create a neural network that maps a certain input to a certain output?Why doesn't overfitting devastate neural networks for MNIST classification?Early stopping and boundsHow Natural language processing and elasticsearch are relatedROC-AUC curve as metric for binary classifier without machine learning algorithmUsing Random Forest Probabilities for customer sensitivityHow to compute G-mean score?How to balance specificity and sensitivity?

Is Cinnamon a desktop environment or a window manager? (Or both?)

How to substitute curly brackets with round brackets in a grid of list

One Dimensional Japanese Puzzle

What options are there, if any, to get information from an enemy's familiar?

What information about me do stores get via my credit card?

how can a perfect fourth interval be considered either consonant or dissonant?

Can I visit the Trinity College (Cambridge) library and see some of their rare books

Variety of transposing instruments

Is every episode of "Where are my Pants?" identical?

Circular reasoning in L'Hopital's rule

ELI5: Why do they say that Israel would have been the fourth country to land a spacecraft on the Moon and why do they call it low cost?

How to determine omitted units in a publication

How do you keep chess fun when your opponent constantly beats you?

Why can I use a list index as an indexing variable in a for loop?

Simulating Exploding Dice

Do ℕ, mathbbN, BbbN, symbbN effectively differ, and is there a "canonical" specification of the naturals?

Categorical vs continuous feature selection/engineering

Why doesn't shell automatically fix "useless use of cat"?

Match Roman Numerals

Was credit for the black hole image misappropriated?

Pretty sure I'm over complicating my loops but unsure how to simplify

Is it ethical to upload a automatically generated paper to a non peer-reviewed site as part of a larger research?

How to make Illustrator type tool selection automatically adapt with text length

Do working physicists consider Newtonian mechanics to be "falsified"?



Compute specificity and sensitivity at certain thresholds



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
2019 Moderator Election Q&A - Questionnaire
2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsRelationship between VC dimension and degrees of freedomCompute Baseline/Representative of Time-Series DataIs it possible using tensorflow to create a neural network that maps a certain input to a certain output?Why doesn't overfitting devastate neural networks for MNIST classification?Early stopping and boundsHow Natural language processing and elasticsearch are relatedROC-AUC curve as metric for binary classifier without machine learning algorithmUsing Random Forest Probabilities for customer sensitivityHow to compute G-mean score?How to balance specificity and sensitivity?










2












$begingroup$


I have the following table with predictive probabilities and true class labels:



beginarray
hline
P(T=1) &0.54& 0.23 & 0.78 & 0.88 & 0.26 & 0.41 & 0.90 & 0.45&0.19&0.36 \ hline
T&1&0 &0 &1 &0 &0& 1& 1& 0& 0\ hline
endarray



The question is to compute the specificity & sensitivity at the threshold of 0.5.




My attempt at answering this question:



Sensitivity = true positive rate[P(T=1) > 0.5]



= (0.54 + 0.88 + 0.9)/4 = 0.58



Specificity = 1-false positive rate[P(T=1) > 0.5]



= 1- [(0.78)/6]
= 0.87



Not sure if my working above is correct. I would appreciate if someone can guide me to the correct solution. Thanks.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    2












    $begingroup$


    I have the following table with predictive probabilities and true class labels:



    beginarray
    hline
    P(T=1) &0.54& 0.23 & 0.78 & 0.88 & 0.26 & 0.41 & 0.90 & 0.45&0.19&0.36 \ hline
    T&1&0 &0 &1 &0 &0& 1& 1& 0& 0\ hline
    endarray



    The question is to compute the specificity & sensitivity at the threshold of 0.5.




    My attempt at answering this question:



    Sensitivity = true positive rate[P(T=1) > 0.5]



    = (0.54 + 0.88 + 0.9)/4 = 0.58



    Specificity = 1-false positive rate[P(T=1) > 0.5]



    = 1- [(0.78)/6]
    = 0.87



    Not sure if my working above is correct. I would appreciate if someone can guide me to the correct solution. Thanks.










    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      I have the following table with predictive probabilities and true class labels:



      beginarray
      hline
      P(T=1) &0.54& 0.23 & 0.78 & 0.88 & 0.26 & 0.41 & 0.90 & 0.45&0.19&0.36 \ hline
      T&1&0 &0 &1 &0 &0& 1& 1& 0& 0\ hline
      endarray



      The question is to compute the specificity & sensitivity at the threshold of 0.5.




      My attempt at answering this question:



      Sensitivity = true positive rate[P(T=1) > 0.5]



      = (0.54 + 0.88 + 0.9)/4 = 0.58



      Specificity = 1-false positive rate[P(T=1) > 0.5]



      = 1- [(0.78)/6]
      = 0.87



      Not sure if my working above is correct. I would appreciate if someone can guide me to the correct solution. Thanks.










      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I have the following table with predictive probabilities and true class labels:



      beginarray
      hline
      P(T=1) &0.54& 0.23 & 0.78 & 0.88 & 0.26 & 0.41 & 0.90 & 0.45&0.19&0.36 \ hline
      T&1&0 &0 &1 &0 &0& 1& 1& 0& 0\ hline
      endarray



      The question is to compute the specificity & sensitivity at the threshold of 0.5.




      My attempt at answering this question:



      Sensitivity = true positive rate[P(T=1) > 0.5]



      = (0.54 + 0.88 + 0.9)/4 = 0.58



      Specificity = 1-false positive rate[P(T=1) > 0.5]



      = 1- [(0.78)/6]
      = 0.87



      Not sure if my working above is correct. I would appreciate if someone can guide me to the correct solution. Thanks.







      classification self-study






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Mar 30 at 16:04









      vic12vic12

      132




      132




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          For threshold = $0.5$ we have:



          Sensitivity = True Positive Rate



          = (number of points with label $1$ and $P(T = 1)geq 0.5$) divided by (number of points with label $1$)



          = $left|(1, 0.54), (1, 0.88), (1, 0.90)right| / 4$ = $3/4$ = $0.75$



          Specificity = 1 - False Positive Rate



          = 1 - (number of points with label $0$ and $P(T = 1)geq 0.5$) divided by (number of points with label $0$)



          = $1 - left|(0, 0.78)right|/6$ = $1 - 1/6$ = $0.833$






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "557"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f48264%2fcompute-specificity-and-sensitivity-at-certain-thresholds%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            For threshold = $0.5$ we have:



            Sensitivity = True Positive Rate



            = (number of points with label $1$ and $P(T = 1)geq 0.5$) divided by (number of points with label $1$)



            = $left|(1, 0.54), (1, 0.88), (1, 0.90)right| / 4$ = $3/4$ = $0.75$



            Specificity = 1 - False Positive Rate



            = 1 - (number of points with label $0$ and $P(T = 1)geq 0.5$) divided by (number of points with label $0$)



            = $1 - left|(0, 0.78)right|/6$ = $1 - 1/6$ = $0.833$






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$

















              1












              $begingroup$

              For threshold = $0.5$ we have:



              Sensitivity = True Positive Rate



              = (number of points with label $1$ and $P(T = 1)geq 0.5$) divided by (number of points with label $1$)



              = $left|(1, 0.54), (1, 0.88), (1, 0.90)right| / 4$ = $3/4$ = $0.75$



              Specificity = 1 - False Positive Rate



              = 1 - (number of points with label $0$ and $P(T = 1)geq 0.5$) divided by (number of points with label $0$)



              = $1 - left|(0, 0.78)right|/6$ = $1 - 1/6$ = $0.833$






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                For threshold = $0.5$ we have:



                Sensitivity = True Positive Rate



                = (number of points with label $1$ and $P(T = 1)geq 0.5$) divided by (number of points with label $1$)



                = $left|(1, 0.54), (1, 0.88), (1, 0.90)right| / 4$ = $3/4$ = $0.75$



                Specificity = 1 - False Positive Rate



                = 1 - (number of points with label $0$ and $P(T = 1)geq 0.5$) divided by (number of points with label $0$)



                = $1 - left|(0, 0.78)right|/6$ = $1 - 1/6$ = $0.833$






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                For threshold = $0.5$ we have:



                Sensitivity = True Positive Rate



                = (number of points with label $1$ and $P(T = 1)geq 0.5$) divided by (number of points with label $1$)



                = $left|(1, 0.54), (1, 0.88), (1, 0.90)right| / 4$ = $3/4$ = $0.75$



                Specificity = 1 - False Positive Rate



                = 1 - (number of points with label $0$ and $P(T = 1)geq 0.5$) divided by (number of points with label $0$)



                = $1 - left|(0, 0.78)right|/6$ = $1 - 1/6$ = $0.833$







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Mar 30 at 16:53

























                answered Mar 30 at 16:47









                EsmailianEsmailian

                3,156320




                3,156320



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f48264%2fcompute-specificity-and-sensitivity-at-certain-thresholds%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Adding axes to figuresAdding axes labels to LaTeX figuresLaTeX equivalent of ConTeXt buffersRotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?adding axes to shapesAlign axes across subfiguresAdding figures with a certain orderLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themAdding axes labels to LaTeX figures

                    Luettelo Yhdysvaltain laivaston lentotukialuksista Lähteet | Navigointivalikko

                    Gary (muusikko) Sisällysluettelo Historia | Rockin' High | Lähteet | Aiheesta muualla | NavigointivalikkoInfobox OKTuomas "Gary" Keskinen Ancaran kitaristiksiProjekti Rockin' High