When to use Standard Scaler and when Normalizer? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara 2019 Moderator Election Q&A - Questionnaire 2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsCan I fine tune the xgboost model instead of re-training it?Scikit Learn Missing Data - Categorical valuesIs GridSearchCV computing SVC with rbf kernel and different degrees?time series forecasting - sliding window methodScaling multiple time series dataMultivariate outlier detection with isolation forest..How to detect most effective features?sklearn.neighbors.NearestNeighbors - knn for unsupervised learning?Why is Local Outlier Factor classified as Unsupervised if it requires training data with no outliers?Online vs Batch Learning in Latent Dirichlet Allocation using Scikit Learntarget in cluster analisys (PCA)
Working through Single Responsibility Principle in Python when Calls are Expensive
How to fill page vertically?
Can the DM override racial traits?
Define a list range inside a list
Pretty sure I'm over complicating my loops but unsure how to simplify
Is it ok to offer lower paid work as a trial period before negotiating for a full-time job?
Can withdrawing asylum be illegal?
Is it ethical to upload a automatically generated paper to a non peer-reviewed site as part of a larger research?
different output for groups and groups USERNAME after adding a username to a group
How to type a long/em dash `—`
Can we generate random numbers using irrational numbers like π and e?
ELI5: Why do they say that Israel would have been the fourth country to land a spacecraft on the Moon and why do they call it low cost?
Word for: a synonym with a positive connotation?
Variety of transposing instruments
Make it rain characters
Do ℕ, mathbbN, BbbN, symbbN effectively differ, and is there a "canonical" specification of the naturals?
How to make Illustrator type tool selection automatically adapt with text length
Is 'stolen' appropriate word?
Did the UK government pay "millions and millions of dollars" to try to snag Julian Assange?
Why not take a picture of a closer black hole?
how can a perfect fourth interval be considered either consonant or dissonant?
What options are there, if any, to get information from an enemy's familiar?
Match Roman Numerals
What aspect of planet earth must be changed to prevent the industrial revolution?
When to use Standard Scaler and when Normalizer?
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
2019 Moderator Election Q&A - Questionnaire
2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsCan I fine tune the xgboost model instead of re-training it?Scikit Learn Missing Data - Categorical valuesIs GridSearchCV computing SVC with rbf kernel and different degrees?time series forecasting - sliding window methodScaling multiple time series dataMultivariate outlier detection with isolation forest..How to detect most effective features?sklearn.neighbors.NearestNeighbors - knn for unsupervised learning?Why is Local Outlier Factor classified as Unsupervised if it requires training data with no outliers?Online vs Batch Learning in Latent Dirichlet Allocation using Scikit Learntarget in cluster analisys (PCA)
$begingroup$
I understand what Standard Scalar does and what Normalizer does as per the Sci-Kit documentation.
Normalizer - https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.preprocessing.Normalizer.html#sklearn.preprocessing.Normalizer
Standard Scaler - https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.preprocessing.StandardScaler.html#sklearn.preprocessing.StandardScaler
I know when Standard Scaler is applied. But in which scenario is Normalizer applied? Are there scenarios where one is preferred over the other?
python scikit-learn data-cleaning normalization
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I understand what Standard Scalar does and what Normalizer does as per the Sci-Kit documentation.
Normalizer - https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.preprocessing.Normalizer.html#sklearn.preprocessing.Normalizer
Standard Scaler - https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.preprocessing.StandardScaler.html#sklearn.preprocessing.StandardScaler
I know when Standard Scaler is applied. But in which scenario is Normalizer applied? Are there scenarios where one is preferred over the other?
python scikit-learn data-cleaning normalization
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I understand what Standard Scalar does and what Normalizer does as per the Sci-Kit documentation.
Normalizer - https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.preprocessing.Normalizer.html#sklearn.preprocessing.Normalizer
Standard Scaler - https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.preprocessing.StandardScaler.html#sklearn.preprocessing.StandardScaler
I know when Standard Scaler is applied. But in which scenario is Normalizer applied? Are there scenarios where one is preferred over the other?
python scikit-learn data-cleaning normalization
$endgroup$
I understand what Standard Scalar does and what Normalizer does as per the Sci-Kit documentation.
Normalizer - https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.preprocessing.Normalizer.html#sklearn.preprocessing.Normalizer
Standard Scaler - https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.preprocessing.StandardScaler.html#sklearn.preprocessing.StandardScaler
I know when Standard Scaler is applied. But in which scenario is Normalizer applied? Are there scenarios where one is preferred over the other?
python scikit-learn data-cleaning normalization
python scikit-learn data-cleaning normalization
edited Mar 31 at 21:44
Heisenbug
asked Feb 20 at 16:38
HeisenbugHeisenbug
462
462
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
StandardScaler
: It transforms the data in such a manner that it has mean as 0 and standard deviation as 1. In short, it standardizes the data. Standardization is useful for data which has negative values. It arranges the data in normal distribution. It is more useful in classification than regression.
You can read this blog of mine.Normalizer
: It squeezes the data between 0 and 1. It performs normalization. Due to the decreased range and magnitude, the gradients in the training process do not explode and you do not get higher values of loss. Is more useful in regression than classification.
You can read this blog of mine.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The normalizer you have defined in your blog is MinMax scaler. The link which I have put for normalization is different. It makes the l2 norm of each data row equal to 1.
$endgroup$
– Heisenbug
Feb 21 at 5:53
$begingroup$
This answer may help you.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Panchal
Feb 21 at 6:42
3
$begingroup$
-1: "[standardization] arranges the data in normal distribution." you should clarify what you mean by this. I read this as "standardization transforms data to have the normal distribution", which is not true. You should also explain why standardization is more useful in classification than regression (and vice versa for normalization); I doubt that claim.
$endgroup$
– Artem Mavrin
Feb 25 at 18:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
They are used for two different purposes.
StandardScaler
changes each feature column $f_:,i$ to $$f'_:,i = fracf_:,i - mean(f_:,i)std(f_:,i).$$
Normalizer
changes each sample $x_n=(f_n,1,...,f_n,d)$ to $$x'_n = fracx_nsize(x_n),$$ where $size(x_n)$ for
l1
norm is $left | x_n right |_1=|f_n,1|+...+|f_n,d|$,l2
norm is $left | x_n right |_2=sqrtf^2_n,1+...+f^2_n,d$,max
norm is $left | x_n right |_infty=maxf_n,d$.
To illustrate the contrast, consider data set $1, 2, 3, 4, 5$ which is one dimensional (each data point has one feature),
After applying StandardScaler
, data set becomes $-1.41, -0.71, 0. ,0.71, 1.41$.
After applying any type of Normalizer
, data set becomes $1., 1., 1., 1., 1.$, since the only feature is divided by itself. So Normalizer
has no use for this case. It also has no use when features have different units, e.g. $(height, age, income)$.
As mentioned in this answer, Normalizer
is mostly useful for controlling the size of a vector in an iterative process, e.g. a parameter vector during training, to avoid numerical instabilities due to large values.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "557"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f45900%2fwhen-to-use-standard-scaler-and-when-normalizer%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
StandardScaler
: It transforms the data in such a manner that it has mean as 0 and standard deviation as 1. In short, it standardizes the data. Standardization is useful for data which has negative values. It arranges the data in normal distribution. It is more useful in classification than regression.
You can read this blog of mine.Normalizer
: It squeezes the data between 0 and 1. It performs normalization. Due to the decreased range and magnitude, the gradients in the training process do not explode and you do not get higher values of loss. Is more useful in regression than classification.
You can read this blog of mine.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The normalizer you have defined in your blog is MinMax scaler. The link which I have put for normalization is different. It makes the l2 norm of each data row equal to 1.
$endgroup$
– Heisenbug
Feb 21 at 5:53
$begingroup$
This answer may help you.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Panchal
Feb 21 at 6:42
3
$begingroup$
-1: "[standardization] arranges the data in normal distribution." you should clarify what you mean by this. I read this as "standardization transforms data to have the normal distribution", which is not true. You should also explain why standardization is more useful in classification than regression (and vice versa for normalization); I doubt that claim.
$endgroup$
– Artem Mavrin
Feb 25 at 18:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
StandardScaler
: It transforms the data in such a manner that it has mean as 0 and standard deviation as 1. In short, it standardizes the data. Standardization is useful for data which has negative values. It arranges the data in normal distribution. It is more useful in classification than regression.
You can read this blog of mine.Normalizer
: It squeezes the data between 0 and 1. It performs normalization. Due to the decreased range and magnitude, the gradients in the training process do not explode and you do not get higher values of loss. Is more useful in regression than classification.
You can read this blog of mine.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The normalizer you have defined in your blog is MinMax scaler. The link which I have put for normalization is different. It makes the l2 norm of each data row equal to 1.
$endgroup$
– Heisenbug
Feb 21 at 5:53
$begingroup$
This answer may help you.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Panchal
Feb 21 at 6:42
3
$begingroup$
-1: "[standardization] arranges the data in normal distribution." you should clarify what you mean by this. I read this as "standardization transforms data to have the normal distribution", which is not true. You should also explain why standardization is more useful in classification than regression (and vice versa for normalization); I doubt that claim.
$endgroup$
– Artem Mavrin
Feb 25 at 18:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
StandardScaler
: It transforms the data in such a manner that it has mean as 0 and standard deviation as 1. In short, it standardizes the data. Standardization is useful for data which has negative values. It arranges the data in normal distribution. It is more useful in classification than regression.
You can read this blog of mine.Normalizer
: It squeezes the data between 0 and 1. It performs normalization. Due to the decreased range and magnitude, the gradients in the training process do not explode and you do not get higher values of loss. Is more useful in regression than classification.
You can read this blog of mine.
$endgroup$
StandardScaler
: It transforms the data in such a manner that it has mean as 0 and standard deviation as 1. In short, it standardizes the data. Standardization is useful for data which has negative values. It arranges the data in normal distribution. It is more useful in classification than regression.
You can read this blog of mine.Normalizer
: It squeezes the data between 0 and 1. It performs normalization. Due to the decreased range and magnitude, the gradients in the training process do not explode and you do not get higher values of loss. Is more useful in regression than classification.
You can read this blog of mine.
answered Feb 21 at 2:20
Shubham PanchalShubham Panchal
37118
37118
$begingroup$
The normalizer you have defined in your blog is MinMax scaler. The link which I have put for normalization is different. It makes the l2 norm of each data row equal to 1.
$endgroup$
– Heisenbug
Feb 21 at 5:53
$begingroup$
This answer may help you.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Panchal
Feb 21 at 6:42
3
$begingroup$
-1: "[standardization] arranges the data in normal distribution." you should clarify what you mean by this. I read this as "standardization transforms data to have the normal distribution", which is not true. You should also explain why standardization is more useful in classification than regression (and vice versa for normalization); I doubt that claim.
$endgroup$
– Artem Mavrin
Feb 25 at 18:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The normalizer you have defined in your blog is MinMax scaler. The link which I have put for normalization is different. It makes the l2 norm of each data row equal to 1.
$endgroup$
– Heisenbug
Feb 21 at 5:53
$begingroup$
This answer may help you.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Panchal
Feb 21 at 6:42
3
$begingroup$
-1: "[standardization] arranges the data in normal distribution." you should clarify what you mean by this. I read this as "standardization transforms data to have the normal distribution", which is not true. You should also explain why standardization is more useful in classification than regression (and vice versa for normalization); I doubt that claim.
$endgroup$
– Artem Mavrin
Feb 25 at 18:37
$begingroup$
The normalizer you have defined in your blog is MinMax scaler. The link which I have put for normalization is different. It makes the l2 norm of each data row equal to 1.
$endgroup$
– Heisenbug
Feb 21 at 5:53
$begingroup$
The normalizer you have defined in your blog is MinMax scaler. The link which I have put for normalization is different. It makes the l2 norm of each data row equal to 1.
$endgroup$
– Heisenbug
Feb 21 at 5:53
$begingroup$
This answer may help you.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Panchal
Feb 21 at 6:42
$begingroup$
This answer may help you.
$endgroup$
– Shubham Panchal
Feb 21 at 6:42
3
3
$begingroup$
-1: "[standardization] arranges the data in normal distribution." you should clarify what you mean by this. I read this as "standardization transforms data to have the normal distribution", which is not true. You should also explain why standardization is more useful in classification than regression (and vice versa for normalization); I doubt that claim.
$endgroup$
– Artem Mavrin
Feb 25 at 18:37
$begingroup$
-1: "[standardization] arranges the data in normal distribution." you should clarify what you mean by this. I read this as "standardization transforms data to have the normal distribution", which is not true. You should also explain why standardization is more useful in classification than regression (and vice versa for normalization); I doubt that claim.
$endgroup$
– Artem Mavrin
Feb 25 at 18:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
They are used for two different purposes.
StandardScaler
changes each feature column $f_:,i$ to $$f'_:,i = fracf_:,i - mean(f_:,i)std(f_:,i).$$
Normalizer
changes each sample $x_n=(f_n,1,...,f_n,d)$ to $$x'_n = fracx_nsize(x_n),$$ where $size(x_n)$ for
l1
norm is $left | x_n right |_1=|f_n,1|+...+|f_n,d|$,l2
norm is $left | x_n right |_2=sqrtf^2_n,1+...+f^2_n,d$,max
norm is $left | x_n right |_infty=maxf_n,d$.
To illustrate the contrast, consider data set $1, 2, 3, 4, 5$ which is one dimensional (each data point has one feature),
After applying StandardScaler
, data set becomes $-1.41, -0.71, 0. ,0.71, 1.41$.
After applying any type of Normalizer
, data set becomes $1., 1., 1., 1., 1.$, since the only feature is divided by itself. So Normalizer
has no use for this case. It also has no use when features have different units, e.g. $(height, age, income)$.
As mentioned in this answer, Normalizer
is mostly useful for controlling the size of a vector in an iterative process, e.g. a parameter vector during training, to avoid numerical instabilities due to large values.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
They are used for two different purposes.
StandardScaler
changes each feature column $f_:,i$ to $$f'_:,i = fracf_:,i - mean(f_:,i)std(f_:,i).$$
Normalizer
changes each sample $x_n=(f_n,1,...,f_n,d)$ to $$x'_n = fracx_nsize(x_n),$$ where $size(x_n)$ for
l1
norm is $left | x_n right |_1=|f_n,1|+...+|f_n,d|$,l2
norm is $left | x_n right |_2=sqrtf^2_n,1+...+f^2_n,d$,max
norm is $left | x_n right |_infty=maxf_n,d$.
To illustrate the contrast, consider data set $1, 2, 3, 4, 5$ which is one dimensional (each data point has one feature),
After applying StandardScaler
, data set becomes $-1.41, -0.71, 0. ,0.71, 1.41$.
After applying any type of Normalizer
, data set becomes $1., 1., 1., 1., 1.$, since the only feature is divided by itself. So Normalizer
has no use for this case. It also has no use when features have different units, e.g. $(height, age, income)$.
As mentioned in this answer, Normalizer
is mostly useful for controlling the size of a vector in an iterative process, e.g. a parameter vector during training, to avoid numerical instabilities due to large values.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
They are used for two different purposes.
StandardScaler
changes each feature column $f_:,i$ to $$f'_:,i = fracf_:,i - mean(f_:,i)std(f_:,i).$$
Normalizer
changes each sample $x_n=(f_n,1,...,f_n,d)$ to $$x'_n = fracx_nsize(x_n),$$ where $size(x_n)$ for
l1
norm is $left | x_n right |_1=|f_n,1|+...+|f_n,d|$,l2
norm is $left | x_n right |_2=sqrtf^2_n,1+...+f^2_n,d$,max
norm is $left | x_n right |_infty=maxf_n,d$.
To illustrate the contrast, consider data set $1, 2, 3, 4, 5$ which is one dimensional (each data point has one feature),
After applying StandardScaler
, data set becomes $-1.41, -0.71, 0. ,0.71, 1.41$.
After applying any type of Normalizer
, data set becomes $1., 1., 1., 1., 1.$, since the only feature is divided by itself. So Normalizer
has no use for this case. It also has no use when features have different units, e.g. $(height, age, income)$.
As mentioned in this answer, Normalizer
is mostly useful for controlling the size of a vector in an iterative process, e.g. a parameter vector during training, to avoid numerical instabilities due to large values.
$endgroup$
They are used for two different purposes.
StandardScaler
changes each feature column $f_:,i$ to $$f'_:,i = fracf_:,i - mean(f_:,i)std(f_:,i).$$
Normalizer
changes each sample $x_n=(f_n,1,...,f_n,d)$ to $$x'_n = fracx_nsize(x_n),$$ where $size(x_n)$ for
l1
norm is $left | x_n right |_1=|f_n,1|+...+|f_n,d|$,l2
norm is $left | x_n right |_2=sqrtf^2_n,1+...+f^2_n,d$,max
norm is $left | x_n right |_infty=maxf_n,d$.
To illustrate the contrast, consider data set $1, 2, 3, 4, 5$ which is one dimensional (each data point has one feature),
After applying StandardScaler
, data set becomes $-1.41, -0.71, 0. ,0.71, 1.41$.
After applying any type of Normalizer
, data set becomes $1., 1., 1., 1., 1.$, since the only feature is divided by itself. So Normalizer
has no use for this case. It also has no use when features have different units, e.g. $(height, age, income)$.
As mentioned in this answer, Normalizer
is mostly useful for controlling the size of a vector in an iterative process, e.g. a parameter vector during training, to avoid numerical instabilities due to large values.
edited Mar 13 at 18:32
answered Mar 9 at 13:36
EsmailianEsmailian
3,156320
3,156320
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f45900%2fwhen-to-use-standard-scaler-and-when-normalizer%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown