What is the process for cleansing a very negative action? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhat is the right time for seclusion?What are the ten courses of action (kamma)?Repeated blissful experiences in meditationExplaining non-attachment to the very attachedHow does kamma create a new set of aggregates for a rebirth; how do the mechanics of this process work?Confused about partner's practices. Need adviceIf you are/become very sensitive for sounds what could be the reason/cause?What does Buddhism say about dealing with negative people?Disguised negative emotions and the mindless brawl called an electionWhat are the characteristics of karmaless action?

For what reasons would an animal species NOT cross a *horizontal* land bridge?

number sequence puzzle deep six

Did the UK government pay "millions and millions of dollars" to try to snag Julian Assange?

Define a list range inside a list

Word for: a synonym with a positive connotation?

Why are Marketing Cloud timestamps not stored in the same timezone as Sales Cloud?

Keeping a retro style to sci-fi spaceships?

Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?

What other Star Trek series did the main TNG cast show up in?

Variety of transposing instruments

Mortgage adviser recommends a longer term than necessary combined with overpayments

Is 'stolen' appropriate word?

Why doesn't shell automatically fix "useless use of cat"?

Humiliated in front of employees

How to determine omitted units in a publication

Make it rain characters

Identify 80s or 90s comics with ripped creatures (not dwarves)

Button changing its text & action. Good or terrible?

Why did Peik Lin say, "I'm not an animal"?

How to politely respond to generic emails requesting a PhD/job in my lab? Without wasting too much time

Can the DM override racial traits?

Using dividends to reduce short term capital gains?

How to design a circuit to convert 100 mV and 50 Hz Sine wave to square wave?

can infinity be divided by anything?



What is the process for cleansing a very negative action?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InWhat is the right time for seclusion?What are the ten courses of action (kamma)?Repeated blissful experiences in meditationExplaining non-attachment to the very attachedHow does kamma create a new set of aggregates for a rebirth; how do the mechanics of this process work?Confused about partner's practices. Need adviceIf you are/become very sensitive for sounds what could be the reason/cause?What does Buddhism say about dealing with negative people?Disguised negative emotions and the mindless brawl called an electionWhat are the characteristics of karmaless action?










3















Several years ago I did something that was totally legal, but very much against my upbringing, my world-view, and my ethics. It was a spur of the moment thing and I have regretted it massively ever since. However, it has haunted me mentally (and to an extent physically, due to tension) ever since.



I might add, this event didn't hurt anyone else.



What can I do from a Buddhist perspective, to completely cancel out this action and its resultant negative thought-stream once and for all?










share|improve this question




























    3















    Several years ago I did something that was totally legal, but very much against my upbringing, my world-view, and my ethics. It was a spur of the moment thing and I have regretted it massively ever since. However, it has haunted me mentally (and to an extent physically, due to tension) ever since.



    I might add, this event didn't hurt anyone else.



    What can I do from a Buddhist perspective, to completely cancel out this action and its resultant negative thought-stream once and for all?










    share|improve this question


























      3












      3








      3


      1






      Several years ago I did something that was totally legal, but very much against my upbringing, my world-view, and my ethics. It was a spur of the moment thing and I have regretted it massively ever since. However, it has haunted me mentally (and to an extent physically, due to tension) ever since.



      I might add, this event didn't hurt anyone else.



      What can I do from a Buddhist perspective, to completely cancel out this action and its resultant negative thought-stream once and for all?










      share|improve this question
















      Several years ago I did something that was totally legal, but very much against my upbringing, my world-view, and my ethics. It was a spur of the moment thing and I have regretted it massively ever since. However, it has haunted me mentally (and to an extent physically, due to tension) ever since.



      I might add, this event didn't hurt anyone else.



      What can I do from a Buddhist perspective, to completely cancel out this action and its resultant negative thought-stream once and for all?







      personal-practice karma suffering






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Apr 3 at 12:28









      Peter Mortensen

      1112




      1112










      asked Mar 31 at 21:23









      EugeneEugene

      161




      161




















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          Nyom Eugene,



          it's most needed to speak with an "admirable" friend", a teacher (one who actually knows), at least not only to know if it was a fault and which kind of. As your words here give much doubt in regard of whether it even wars or if "you world-view" has something to do with what is right or wrong, and since it is not a proper enviroment here, it's good when Nyom seeks for refuge at proper place.



          All my person can offer are proper places here. Amends & confession or Uposatha/Sila ceremonies.



          The pattern to come out of a fault is simple: recognize it clear as fault, be ashamed and express it, firm resolving not to ever engage into such again. That's it. Clean. Yet of course does not make deeds undone, but when effects ripe later, easy to bear and one can after cleaning move on, having been lifted out of the hole.






          share|improve this answer
































            1














            The Buddha taught every negative action arises from "the element of ignorance" rather than is performed by "the self". "You" did not perform the negative action. What performed the negative action was "the element of ignorance". This is the path of cleansing of Noble Practitioners.



            Refer to suttas SN 45.1, SN 12.17, Dhp 172 & 173 & MN 115.






            share|improve this answer

























            • Excellent readings @dhammadhatu. Thank you for referring me to them. And the words "You" did not perform the negative action. What performed the negative action was "the element of ignorance" is an important truth for me to remember. I think I need to get that tattoo'd up my arm to make sure I never forget it.

              – Eugene
              Apr 1 at 14:07



















            0














            I'm not a professional or anything like that. I don't have a bunch of garbage to text. Simply forgive yourself.






            share|improve this answer













            We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.









            • 3





              Hello and welcome to Buddhism SE. For information on how to write a good answer, please see "How do I write a good answer?". Answer needs to be revised and provided with further context and explanation.

              – Lanka
              Apr 1 at 17:06












            • Don't really like what you're implying with "I don't have a bunch of garbage to text." It comes off like you're looking down on people who give long answers, which isn't cool.

              – Jess STJ
              Apr 3 at 2:41











            • My bad didn't mean to hurt your feelings. That's not what I was implying. I read the question and the answer to me was simple. But I am not that person and it may not be simple for him. I was implying that I don't need to type a ton of stuff for such a simple answer. Apparently there are rules for that. I don't like rules made by man. They are useless.

              – user15082
              Apr 3 at 3:20











            • I am curious, @user15082. When you say that you "don't like rules made by man", does that includes the teachings of the Buddha? If so, curious that you would be here in this exchange. If not, I did not understand your answer. (Note: I am not 'baiting' you, I am genuinely trying to find out what you meant.) Best, Jim

              – GVCOJims
              Apr 5 at 23:52



















            0














            According to SN 7.21 (quoted below), one could purify oneself of sins, not by water purification (as practised by Brahmins), but rather by dipping oneself in the lake of the Dhamma (Buddha's teachings) which has the shore of virtues (sila) - in order words, by practising the teachings, we can purify ourselves.




            The Buddha said to Sangarava:



            “Is it really true, brahmin, that you practice purification by water,
            believing in purification by water; that you live committed to the
            practice of immersing yourself in water at dawn and dusk?”



            “Yes, Master Gotama.”



            “But brahmin, for what reason do you practice purification by water?”



            “It’s because, Master Gotama, whatever bad deeds I’ve done during the
            day I wash off by bathing at dusk; and whatever bad deeds I’ve done
            during the night, I wash off by bathing at dawn. That’s the reason why
            I practice purification by water.”




            “The teaching is a lake with shores of ethics, brahmin,

            unclouded, praised by the fine to the good.

            There the knowledge-masters go to bathe,

            and cross to the far shore without getting wet.”




            When he had spoken, Saṅgārava said to the Buddha:



            “Excellent, Master Gotama! Excellent! … From this day forth, may
            Master Gotama remember me as a lay follower who has gone for refuge
            for life.”




            According to the Salt Crystal Sutta (quoted below), the notion of purification by practising the teachings is expounded further, through the explanation that one should be "developed in [contemplating] the body, developed in virtue, developed in mind, developed in discernment: unrestricted, large-hearted, dwelling with the immeasurable". If you dive deep into what this phrase means, that's all you need to cleanse your negative past completely. You can find some useful commentary by Piya Tan here.




            "Suppose that a man were to drop a salt crystal into a small amount of
            water in a cup. What do you think? Would the water in the cup become
            salty because of the salt crystal, and unfit to drink?"



            "Yes, lord. Why is that? There being only a small amount of water in
            the cup, it would become salty because of the salt crystal, and unfit
            to drink."



            "Now suppose that a man were to drop a salt crystal into the River
            Ganges. What do you think? Would the water in the River Ganges become
            salty because of the salt crystal, and unfit to drink?"



            "No, lord. Why is that? There being a great mass of water in the River
            Ganges, it would not become salty because of the salt crystal or unfit
            to drink."



            "In the same way, there is the case where a trifling evil deed done by
            one individual [the first] takes him to hell; and there is the case
            where the very same sort of trifling deed done by the other individual
            is experienced in the here & now, and for the most part barely appears
            for a moment.



            'Now, a trifling evil act done by what sort of individual takes him to
            hell? There is the case where a certain individual is undeveloped in
            the body, undeveloped in virtue, undeveloped in mind [i.e.,
            painful feelings can invade the mind and stay there], undeveloped in
            discernment: restricted, small-hearted, dwelling with suffering. A
            trifling evil act done by this sort of individual takes him to hell.



            'Now, a trifling evil act done by what sort of individual is
            experienced in the here & now, and for the most part barely appears
            for a moment? There is the case where a certain individual is
            developed in the body, developed in virtue, developed in mind
            [i.e., painful feelings cannot invade the mind and stay there],
            developed in discernment: unrestricted, large-hearted, dwelling with
            the immeasurable. A trifling evil act done by this sort of individual
            is experienced in the here & now, and for the most part barely appears
            for a moment.




            The teachings on the Brahmaviharas in particular are further elaborated in AN 10.219.






            share|improve this answer

























            • An excellent and very appropriate answer for me personally @ruben2020. I do not always do my best to focus on the dharma on a daily basis. If I read correctly what the sutras you have quoted say then I can dilute my 'evil deed' to the point of non-existence (like the salt in the Ganges) by expanding my immersion in the teachings. Is the right?

              – Eugene
              Apr 4 at 17:31











            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "565"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbuddhism.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31747%2fwhat-is-the-process-for-cleansing-a-very-negative-action%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            4 Answers
            4






            active

            oldest

            votes








            4 Answers
            4






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1














            Nyom Eugene,



            it's most needed to speak with an "admirable" friend", a teacher (one who actually knows), at least not only to know if it was a fault and which kind of. As your words here give much doubt in regard of whether it even wars or if "you world-view" has something to do with what is right or wrong, and since it is not a proper enviroment here, it's good when Nyom seeks for refuge at proper place.



            All my person can offer are proper places here. Amends & confession or Uposatha/Sila ceremonies.



            The pattern to come out of a fault is simple: recognize it clear as fault, be ashamed and express it, firm resolving not to ever engage into such again. That's it. Clean. Yet of course does not make deeds undone, but when effects ripe later, easy to bear and one can after cleaning move on, having been lifted out of the hole.






            share|improve this answer





























              1














              Nyom Eugene,



              it's most needed to speak with an "admirable" friend", a teacher (one who actually knows), at least not only to know if it was a fault and which kind of. As your words here give much doubt in regard of whether it even wars or if "you world-view" has something to do with what is right or wrong, and since it is not a proper enviroment here, it's good when Nyom seeks for refuge at proper place.



              All my person can offer are proper places here. Amends & confession or Uposatha/Sila ceremonies.



              The pattern to come out of a fault is simple: recognize it clear as fault, be ashamed and express it, firm resolving not to ever engage into such again. That's it. Clean. Yet of course does not make deeds undone, but when effects ripe later, easy to bear and one can after cleaning move on, having been lifted out of the hole.






              share|improve this answer



























                1












                1








                1







                Nyom Eugene,



                it's most needed to speak with an "admirable" friend", a teacher (one who actually knows), at least not only to know if it was a fault and which kind of. As your words here give much doubt in regard of whether it even wars or if "you world-view" has something to do with what is right or wrong, and since it is not a proper enviroment here, it's good when Nyom seeks for refuge at proper place.



                All my person can offer are proper places here. Amends & confession or Uposatha/Sila ceremonies.



                The pattern to come out of a fault is simple: recognize it clear as fault, be ashamed and express it, firm resolving not to ever engage into such again. That's it. Clean. Yet of course does not make deeds undone, but when effects ripe later, easy to bear and one can after cleaning move on, having been lifted out of the hole.






                share|improve this answer















                Nyom Eugene,



                it's most needed to speak with an "admirable" friend", a teacher (one who actually knows), at least not only to know if it was a fault and which kind of. As your words here give much doubt in regard of whether it even wars or if "you world-view" has something to do with what is right or wrong, and since it is not a proper enviroment here, it's good when Nyom seeks for refuge at proper place.



                All my person can offer are proper places here. Amends & confession or Uposatha/Sila ceremonies.



                The pattern to come out of a fault is simple: recognize it clear as fault, be ashamed and express it, firm resolving not to ever engage into such again. That's it. Clean. Yet of course does not make deeds undone, but when effects ripe later, easy to bear and one can after cleaning move on, having been lifted out of the hole.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Apr 1 at 0:05

























                answered Mar 31 at 23:36









                Samana JohannSamana Johann

                112




                112





















                    1














                    The Buddha taught every negative action arises from "the element of ignorance" rather than is performed by "the self". "You" did not perform the negative action. What performed the negative action was "the element of ignorance". This is the path of cleansing of Noble Practitioners.



                    Refer to suttas SN 45.1, SN 12.17, Dhp 172 & 173 & MN 115.






                    share|improve this answer

























                    • Excellent readings @dhammadhatu. Thank you for referring me to them. And the words "You" did not perform the negative action. What performed the negative action was "the element of ignorance" is an important truth for me to remember. I think I need to get that tattoo'd up my arm to make sure I never forget it.

                      – Eugene
                      Apr 1 at 14:07
















                    1














                    The Buddha taught every negative action arises from "the element of ignorance" rather than is performed by "the self". "You" did not perform the negative action. What performed the negative action was "the element of ignorance". This is the path of cleansing of Noble Practitioners.



                    Refer to suttas SN 45.1, SN 12.17, Dhp 172 & 173 & MN 115.






                    share|improve this answer

























                    • Excellent readings @dhammadhatu. Thank you for referring me to them. And the words "You" did not perform the negative action. What performed the negative action was "the element of ignorance" is an important truth for me to remember. I think I need to get that tattoo'd up my arm to make sure I never forget it.

                      – Eugene
                      Apr 1 at 14:07














                    1












                    1








                    1







                    The Buddha taught every negative action arises from "the element of ignorance" rather than is performed by "the self". "You" did not perform the negative action. What performed the negative action was "the element of ignorance". This is the path of cleansing of Noble Practitioners.



                    Refer to suttas SN 45.1, SN 12.17, Dhp 172 & 173 & MN 115.






                    share|improve this answer















                    The Buddha taught every negative action arises from "the element of ignorance" rather than is performed by "the self". "You" did not perform the negative action. What performed the negative action was "the element of ignorance". This is the path of cleansing of Noble Practitioners.



                    Refer to suttas SN 45.1, SN 12.17, Dhp 172 & 173 & MN 115.







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Apr 1 at 2:52

























                    answered Apr 1 at 2:46









                    DhammadhatuDhammadhatu

                    25.8k11044




                    25.8k11044












                    • Excellent readings @dhammadhatu. Thank you for referring me to them. And the words "You" did not perform the negative action. What performed the negative action was "the element of ignorance" is an important truth for me to remember. I think I need to get that tattoo'd up my arm to make sure I never forget it.

                      – Eugene
                      Apr 1 at 14:07


















                    • Excellent readings @dhammadhatu. Thank you for referring me to them. And the words "You" did not perform the negative action. What performed the negative action was "the element of ignorance" is an important truth for me to remember. I think I need to get that tattoo'd up my arm to make sure I never forget it.

                      – Eugene
                      Apr 1 at 14:07

















                    Excellent readings @dhammadhatu. Thank you for referring me to them. And the words "You" did not perform the negative action. What performed the negative action was "the element of ignorance" is an important truth for me to remember. I think I need to get that tattoo'd up my arm to make sure I never forget it.

                    – Eugene
                    Apr 1 at 14:07






                    Excellent readings @dhammadhatu. Thank you for referring me to them. And the words "You" did not perform the negative action. What performed the negative action was "the element of ignorance" is an important truth for me to remember. I think I need to get that tattoo'd up my arm to make sure I never forget it.

                    – Eugene
                    Apr 1 at 14:07












                    0














                    I'm not a professional or anything like that. I don't have a bunch of garbage to text. Simply forgive yourself.






                    share|improve this answer













                    We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.









                    • 3





                      Hello and welcome to Buddhism SE. For information on how to write a good answer, please see "How do I write a good answer?". Answer needs to be revised and provided with further context and explanation.

                      – Lanka
                      Apr 1 at 17:06












                    • Don't really like what you're implying with "I don't have a bunch of garbage to text." It comes off like you're looking down on people who give long answers, which isn't cool.

                      – Jess STJ
                      Apr 3 at 2:41











                    • My bad didn't mean to hurt your feelings. That's not what I was implying. I read the question and the answer to me was simple. But I am not that person and it may not be simple for him. I was implying that I don't need to type a ton of stuff for such a simple answer. Apparently there are rules for that. I don't like rules made by man. They are useless.

                      – user15082
                      Apr 3 at 3:20











                    • I am curious, @user15082. When you say that you "don't like rules made by man", does that includes the teachings of the Buddha? If so, curious that you would be here in this exchange. If not, I did not understand your answer. (Note: I am not 'baiting' you, I am genuinely trying to find out what you meant.) Best, Jim

                      – GVCOJims
                      Apr 5 at 23:52
















                    0














                    I'm not a professional or anything like that. I don't have a bunch of garbage to text. Simply forgive yourself.






                    share|improve this answer













                    We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.









                    • 3





                      Hello and welcome to Buddhism SE. For information on how to write a good answer, please see "How do I write a good answer?". Answer needs to be revised and provided with further context and explanation.

                      – Lanka
                      Apr 1 at 17:06












                    • Don't really like what you're implying with "I don't have a bunch of garbage to text." It comes off like you're looking down on people who give long answers, which isn't cool.

                      – Jess STJ
                      Apr 3 at 2:41











                    • My bad didn't mean to hurt your feelings. That's not what I was implying. I read the question and the answer to me was simple. But I am not that person and it may not be simple for him. I was implying that I don't need to type a ton of stuff for such a simple answer. Apparently there are rules for that. I don't like rules made by man. They are useless.

                      – user15082
                      Apr 3 at 3:20











                    • I am curious, @user15082. When you say that you "don't like rules made by man", does that includes the teachings of the Buddha? If so, curious that you would be here in this exchange. If not, I did not understand your answer. (Note: I am not 'baiting' you, I am genuinely trying to find out what you meant.) Best, Jim

                      – GVCOJims
                      Apr 5 at 23:52














                    0












                    0








                    0







                    I'm not a professional or anything like that. I don't have a bunch of garbage to text. Simply forgive yourself.






                    share|improve this answer













                    I'm not a professional or anything like that. I don't have a bunch of garbage to text. Simply forgive yourself.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered Apr 1 at 4:04









                    user15082user15082

                    11




                    11



                    We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.




                    We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.








                    • 3





                      Hello and welcome to Buddhism SE. For information on how to write a good answer, please see "How do I write a good answer?". Answer needs to be revised and provided with further context and explanation.

                      – Lanka
                      Apr 1 at 17:06












                    • Don't really like what you're implying with "I don't have a bunch of garbage to text." It comes off like you're looking down on people who give long answers, which isn't cool.

                      – Jess STJ
                      Apr 3 at 2:41











                    • My bad didn't mean to hurt your feelings. That's not what I was implying. I read the question and the answer to me was simple. But I am not that person and it may not be simple for him. I was implying that I don't need to type a ton of stuff for such a simple answer. Apparently there are rules for that. I don't like rules made by man. They are useless.

                      – user15082
                      Apr 3 at 3:20











                    • I am curious, @user15082. When you say that you "don't like rules made by man", does that includes the teachings of the Buddha? If so, curious that you would be here in this exchange. If not, I did not understand your answer. (Note: I am not 'baiting' you, I am genuinely trying to find out what you meant.) Best, Jim

                      – GVCOJims
                      Apr 5 at 23:52













                    • 3





                      Hello and welcome to Buddhism SE. For information on how to write a good answer, please see "How do I write a good answer?". Answer needs to be revised and provided with further context and explanation.

                      – Lanka
                      Apr 1 at 17:06












                    • Don't really like what you're implying with "I don't have a bunch of garbage to text." It comes off like you're looking down on people who give long answers, which isn't cool.

                      – Jess STJ
                      Apr 3 at 2:41











                    • My bad didn't mean to hurt your feelings. That's not what I was implying. I read the question and the answer to me was simple. But I am not that person and it may not be simple for him. I was implying that I don't need to type a ton of stuff for such a simple answer. Apparently there are rules for that. I don't like rules made by man. They are useless.

                      – user15082
                      Apr 3 at 3:20











                    • I am curious, @user15082. When you say that you "don't like rules made by man", does that includes the teachings of the Buddha? If so, curious that you would be here in this exchange. If not, I did not understand your answer. (Note: I am not 'baiting' you, I am genuinely trying to find out what you meant.) Best, Jim

                      – GVCOJims
                      Apr 5 at 23:52








                    3




                    3





                    Hello and welcome to Buddhism SE. For information on how to write a good answer, please see "How do I write a good answer?". Answer needs to be revised and provided with further context and explanation.

                    – Lanka
                    Apr 1 at 17:06






                    Hello and welcome to Buddhism SE. For information on how to write a good answer, please see "How do I write a good answer?". Answer needs to be revised and provided with further context and explanation.

                    – Lanka
                    Apr 1 at 17:06














                    Don't really like what you're implying with "I don't have a bunch of garbage to text." It comes off like you're looking down on people who give long answers, which isn't cool.

                    – Jess STJ
                    Apr 3 at 2:41





                    Don't really like what you're implying with "I don't have a bunch of garbage to text." It comes off like you're looking down on people who give long answers, which isn't cool.

                    – Jess STJ
                    Apr 3 at 2:41













                    My bad didn't mean to hurt your feelings. That's not what I was implying. I read the question and the answer to me was simple. But I am not that person and it may not be simple for him. I was implying that I don't need to type a ton of stuff for such a simple answer. Apparently there are rules for that. I don't like rules made by man. They are useless.

                    – user15082
                    Apr 3 at 3:20





                    My bad didn't mean to hurt your feelings. That's not what I was implying. I read the question and the answer to me was simple. But I am not that person and it may not be simple for him. I was implying that I don't need to type a ton of stuff for such a simple answer. Apparently there are rules for that. I don't like rules made by man. They are useless.

                    – user15082
                    Apr 3 at 3:20













                    I am curious, @user15082. When you say that you "don't like rules made by man", does that includes the teachings of the Buddha? If so, curious that you would be here in this exchange. If not, I did not understand your answer. (Note: I am not 'baiting' you, I am genuinely trying to find out what you meant.) Best, Jim

                    – GVCOJims
                    Apr 5 at 23:52






                    I am curious, @user15082. When you say that you "don't like rules made by man", does that includes the teachings of the Buddha? If so, curious that you would be here in this exchange. If not, I did not understand your answer. (Note: I am not 'baiting' you, I am genuinely trying to find out what you meant.) Best, Jim

                    – GVCOJims
                    Apr 5 at 23:52












                    0














                    According to SN 7.21 (quoted below), one could purify oneself of sins, not by water purification (as practised by Brahmins), but rather by dipping oneself in the lake of the Dhamma (Buddha's teachings) which has the shore of virtues (sila) - in order words, by practising the teachings, we can purify ourselves.




                    The Buddha said to Sangarava:



                    “Is it really true, brahmin, that you practice purification by water,
                    believing in purification by water; that you live committed to the
                    practice of immersing yourself in water at dawn and dusk?”



                    “Yes, Master Gotama.”



                    “But brahmin, for what reason do you practice purification by water?”



                    “It’s because, Master Gotama, whatever bad deeds I’ve done during the
                    day I wash off by bathing at dusk; and whatever bad deeds I’ve done
                    during the night, I wash off by bathing at dawn. That’s the reason why
                    I practice purification by water.”




                    “The teaching is a lake with shores of ethics, brahmin,

                    unclouded, praised by the fine to the good.

                    There the knowledge-masters go to bathe,

                    and cross to the far shore without getting wet.”




                    When he had spoken, Saṅgārava said to the Buddha:



                    “Excellent, Master Gotama! Excellent! … From this day forth, may
                    Master Gotama remember me as a lay follower who has gone for refuge
                    for life.”




                    According to the Salt Crystal Sutta (quoted below), the notion of purification by practising the teachings is expounded further, through the explanation that one should be "developed in [contemplating] the body, developed in virtue, developed in mind, developed in discernment: unrestricted, large-hearted, dwelling with the immeasurable". If you dive deep into what this phrase means, that's all you need to cleanse your negative past completely. You can find some useful commentary by Piya Tan here.




                    "Suppose that a man were to drop a salt crystal into a small amount of
                    water in a cup. What do you think? Would the water in the cup become
                    salty because of the salt crystal, and unfit to drink?"



                    "Yes, lord. Why is that? There being only a small amount of water in
                    the cup, it would become salty because of the salt crystal, and unfit
                    to drink."



                    "Now suppose that a man were to drop a salt crystal into the River
                    Ganges. What do you think? Would the water in the River Ganges become
                    salty because of the salt crystal, and unfit to drink?"



                    "No, lord. Why is that? There being a great mass of water in the River
                    Ganges, it would not become salty because of the salt crystal or unfit
                    to drink."



                    "In the same way, there is the case where a trifling evil deed done by
                    one individual [the first] takes him to hell; and there is the case
                    where the very same sort of trifling deed done by the other individual
                    is experienced in the here & now, and for the most part barely appears
                    for a moment.



                    'Now, a trifling evil act done by what sort of individual takes him to
                    hell? There is the case where a certain individual is undeveloped in
                    the body, undeveloped in virtue, undeveloped in mind [i.e.,
                    painful feelings can invade the mind and stay there], undeveloped in
                    discernment: restricted, small-hearted, dwelling with suffering. A
                    trifling evil act done by this sort of individual takes him to hell.



                    'Now, a trifling evil act done by what sort of individual is
                    experienced in the here & now, and for the most part barely appears
                    for a moment? There is the case where a certain individual is
                    developed in the body, developed in virtue, developed in mind
                    [i.e., painful feelings cannot invade the mind and stay there],
                    developed in discernment: unrestricted, large-hearted, dwelling with
                    the immeasurable. A trifling evil act done by this sort of individual
                    is experienced in the here & now, and for the most part barely appears
                    for a moment.




                    The teachings on the Brahmaviharas in particular are further elaborated in AN 10.219.






                    share|improve this answer

























                    • An excellent and very appropriate answer for me personally @ruben2020. I do not always do my best to focus on the dharma on a daily basis. If I read correctly what the sutras you have quoted say then I can dilute my 'evil deed' to the point of non-existence (like the salt in the Ganges) by expanding my immersion in the teachings. Is the right?

                      – Eugene
                      Apr 4 at 17:31















                    0














                    According to SN 7.21 (quoted below), one could purify oneself of sins, not by water purification (as practised by Brahmins), but rather by dipping oneself in the lake of the Dhamma (Buddha's teachings) which has the shore of virtues (sila) - in order words, by practising the teachings, we can purify ourselves.




                    The Buddha said to Sangarava:



                    “Is it really true, brahmin, that you practice purification by water,
                    believing in purification by water; that you live committed to the
                    practice of immersing yourself in water at dawn and dusk?”



                    “Yes, Master Gotama.”



                    “But brahmin, for what reason do you practice purification by water?”



                    “It’s because, Master Gotama, whatever bad deeds I’ve done during the
                    day I wash off by bathing at dusk; and whatever bad deeds I’ve done
                    during the night, I wash off by bathing at dawn. That’s the reason why
                    I practice purification by water.”




                    “The teaching is a lake with shores of ethics, brahmin,

                    unclouded, praised by the fine to the good.

                    There the knowledge-masters go to bathe,

                    and cross to the far shore without getting wet.”




                    When he had spoken, Saṅgārava said to the Buddha:



                    “Excellent, Master Gotama! Excellent! … From this day forth, may
                    Master Gotama remember me as a lay follower who has gone for refuge
                    for life.”




                    According to the Salt Crystal Sutta (quoted below), the notion of purification by practising the teachings is expounded further, through the explanation that one should be "developed in [contemplating] the body, developed in virtue, developed in mind, developed in discernment: unrestricted, large-hearted, dwelling with the immeasurable". If you dive deep into what this phrase means, that's all you need to cleanse your negative past completely. You can find some useful commentary by Piya Tan here.




                    "Suppose that a man were to drop a salt crystal into a small amount of
                    water in a cup. What do you think? Would the water in the cup become
                    salty because of the salt crystal, and unfit to drink?"



                    "Yes, lord. Why is that? There being only a small amount of water in
                    the cup, it would become salty because of the salt crystal, and unfit
                    to drink."



                    "Now suppose that a man were to drop a salt crystal into the River
                    Ganges. What do you think? Would the water in the River Ganges become
                    salty because of the salt crystal, and unfit to drink?"



                    "No, lord. Why is that? There being a great mass of water in the River
                    Ganges, it would not become salty because of the salt crystal or unfit
                    to drink."



                    "In the same way, there is the case where a trifling evil deed done by
                    one individual [the first] takes him to hell; and there is the case
                    where the very same sort of trifling deed done by the other individual
                    is experienced in the here & now, and for the most part barely appears
                    for a moment.



                    'Now, a trifling evil act done by what sort of individual takes him to
                    hell? There is the case where a certain individual is undeveloped in
                    the body, undeveloped in virtue, undeveloped in mind [i.e.,
                    painful feelings can invade the mind and stay there], undeveloped in
                    discernment: restricted, small-hearted, dwelling with suffering. A
                    trifling evil act done by this sort of individual takes him to hell.



                    'Now, a trifling evil act done by what sort of individual is
                    experienced in the here & now, and for the most part barely appears
                    for a moment? There is the case where a certain individual is
                    developed in the body, developed in virtue, developed in mind
                    [i.e., painful feelings cannot invade the mind and stay there],
                    developed in discernment: unrestricted, large-hearted, dwelling with
                    the immeasurable. A trifling evil act done by this sort of individual
                    is experienced in the here & now, and for the most part barely appears
                    for a moment.




                    The teachings on the Brahmaviharas in particular are further elaborated in AN 10.219.






                    share|improve this answer

























                    • An excellent and very appropriate answer for me personally @ruben2020. I do not always do my best to focus on the dharma on a daily basis. If I read correctly what the sutras you have quoted say then I can dilute my 'evil deed' to the point of non-existence (like the salt in the Ganges) by expanding my immersion in the teachings. Is the right?

                      – Eugene
                      Apr 4 at 17:31













                    0












                    0








                    0







                    According to SN 7.21 (quoted below), one could purify oneself of sins, not by water purification (as practised by Brahmins), but rather by dipping oneself in the lake of the Dhamma (Buddha's teachings) which has the shore of virtues (sila) - in order words, by practising the teachings, we can purify ourselves.




                    The Buddha said to Sangarava:



                    “Is it really true, brahmin, that you practice purification by water,
                    believing in purification by water; that you live committed to the
                    practice of immersing yourself in water at dawn and dusk?”



                    “Yes, Master Gotama.”



                    “But brahmin, for what reason do you practice purification by water?”



                    “It’s because, Master Gotama, whatever bad deeds I’ve done during the
                    day I wash off by bathing at dusk; and whatever bad deeds I’ve done
                    during the night, I wash off by bathing at dawn. That’s the reason why
                    I practice purification by water.”




                    “The teaching is a lake with shores of ethics, brahmin,

                    unclouded, praised by the fine to the good.

                    There the knowledge-masters go to bathe,

                    and cross to the far shore without getting wet.”




                    When he had spoken, Saṅgārava said to the Buddha:



                    “Excellent, Master Gotama! Excellent! … From this day forth, may
                    Master Gotama remember me as a lay follower who has gone for refuge
                    for life.”




                    According to the Salt Crystal Sutta (quoted below), the notion of purification by practising the teachings is expounded further, through the explanation that one should be "developed in [contemplating] the body, developed in virtue, developed in mind, developed in discernment: unrestricted, large-hearted, dwelling with the immeasurable". If you dive deep into what this phrase means, that's all you need to cleanse your negative past completely. You can find some useful commentary by Piya Tan here.




                    "Suppose that a man were to drop a salt crystal into a small amount of
                    water in a cup. What do you think? Would the water in the cup become
                    salty because of the salt crystal, and unfit to drink?"



                    "Yes, lord. Why is that? There being only a small amount of water in
                    the cup, it would become salty because of the salt crystal, and unfit
                    to drink."



                    "Now suppose that a man were to drop a salt crystal into the River
                    Ganges. What do you think? Would the water in the River Ganges become
                    salty because of the salt crystal, and unfit to drink?"



                    "No, lord. Why is that? There being a great mass of water in the River
                    Ganges, it would not become salty because of the salt crystal or unfit
                    to drink."



                    "In the same way, there is the case where a trifling evil deed done by
                    one individual [the first] takes him to hell; and there is the case
                    where the very same sort of trifling deed done by the other individual
                    is experienced in the here & now, and for the most part barely appears
                    for a moment.



                    'Now, a trifling evil act done by what sort of individual takes him to
                    hell? There is the case where a certain individual is undeveloped in
                    the body, undeveloped in virtue, undeveloped in mind [i.e.,
                    painful feelings can invade the mind and stay there], undeveloped in
                    discernment: restricted, small-hearted, dwelling with suffering. A
                    trifling evil act done by this sort of individual takes him to hell.



                    'Now, a trifling evil act done by what sort of individual is
                    experienced in the here & now, and for the most part barely appears
                    for a moment? There is the case where a certain individual is
                    developed in the body, developed in virtue, developed in mind
                    [i.e., painful feelings cannot invade the mind and stay there],
                    developed in discernment: unrestricted, large-hearted, dwelling with
                    the immeasurable. A trifling evil act done by this sort of individual
                    is experienced in the here & now, and for the most part barely appears
                    for a moment.




                    The teachings on the Brahmaviharas in particular are further elaborated in AN 10.219.






                    share|improve this answer















                    According to SN 7.21 (quoted below), one could purify oneself of sins, not by water purification (as practised by Brahmins), but rather by dipping oneself in the lake of the Dhamma (Buddha's teachings) which has the shore of virtues (sila) - in order words, by practising the teachings, we can purify ourselves.




                    The Buddha said to Sangarava:



                    “Is it really true, brahmin, that you practice purification by water,
                    believing in purification by water; that you live committed to the
                    practice of immersing yourself in water at dawn and dusk?”



                    “Yes, Master Gotama.”



                    “But brahmin, for what reason do you practice purification by water?”



                    “It’s because, Master Gotama, whatever bad deeds I’ve done during the
                    day I wash off by bathing at dusk; and whatever bad deeds I’ve done
                    during the night, I wash off by bathing at dawn. That’s the reason why
                    I practice purification by water.”




                    “The teaching is a lake with shores of ethics, brahmin,

                    unclouded, praised by the fine to the good.

                    There the knowledge-masters go to bathe,

                    and cross to the far shore without getting wet.”




                    When he had spoken, Saṅgārava said to the Buddha:



                    “Excellent, Master Gotama! Excellent! … From this day forth, may
                    Master Gotama remember me as a lay follower who has gone for refuge
                    for life.”




                    According to the Salt Crystal Sutta (quoted below), the notion of purification by practising the teachings is expounded further, through the explanation that one should be "developed in [contemplating] the body, developed in virtue, developed in mind, developed in discernment: unrestricted, large-hearted, dwelling with the immeasurable". If you dive deep into what this phrase means, that's all you need to cleanse your negative past completely. You can find some useful commentary by Piya Tan here.




                    "Suppose that a man were to drop a salt crystal into a small amount of
                    water in a cup. What do you think? Would the water in the cup become
                    salty because of the salt crystal, and unfit to drink?"



                    "Yes, lord. Why is that? There being only a small amount of water in
                    the cup, it would become salty because of the salt crystal, and unfit
                    to drink."



                    "Now suppose that a man were to drop a salt crystal into the River
                    Ganges. What do you think? Would the water in the River Ganges become
                    salty because of the salt crystal, and unfit to drink?"



                    "No, lord. Why is that? There being a great mass of water in the River
                    Ganges, it would not become salty because of the salt crystal or unfit
                    to drink."



                    "In the same way, there is the case where a trifling evil deed done by
                    one individual [the first] takes him to hell; and there is the case
                    where the very same sort of trifling deed done by the other individual
                    is experienced in the here & now, and for the most part barely appears
                    for a moment.



                    'Now, a trifling evil act done by what sort of individual takes him to
                    hell? There is the case where a certain individual is undeveloped in
                    the body, undeveloped in virtue, undeveloped in mind [i.e.,
                    painful feelings can invade the mind and stay there], undeveloped in
                    discernment: restricted, small-hearted, dwelling with suffering. A
                    trifling evil act done by this sort of individual takes him to hell.



                    'Now, a trifling evil act done by what sort of individual is
                    experienced in the here & now, and for the most part barely appears
                    for a moment? There is the case where a certain individual is
                    developed in the body, developed in virtue, developed in mind
                    [i.e., painful feelings cannot invade the mind and stay there],
                    developed in discernment: unrestricted, large-hearted, dwelling with
                    the immeasurable. A trifling evil act done by this sort of individual
                    is experienced in the here & now, and for the most part barely appears
                    for a moment.




                    The teachings on the Brahmaviharas in particular are further elaborated in AN 10.219.







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Apr 3 at 16:05

























                    answered Apr 3 at 14:58









                    ruben2020ruben2020

                    16k31243




                    16k31243












                    • An excellent and very appropriate answer for me personally @ruben2020. I do not always do my best to focus on the dharma on a daily basis. If I read correctly what the sutras you have quoted say then I can dilute my 'evil deed' to the point of non-existence (like the salt in the Ganges) by expanding my immersion in the teachings. Is the right?

                      – Eugene
                      Apr 4 at 17:31

















                    • An excellent and very appropriate answer for me personally @ruben2020. I do not always do my best to focus on the dharma on a daily basis. If I read correctly what the sutras you have quoted say then I can dilute my 'evil deed' to the point of non-existence (like the salt in the Ganges) by expanding my immersion in the teachings. Is the right?

                      – Eugene
                      Apr 4 at 17:31
















                    An excellent and very appropriate answer for me personally @ruben2020. I do not always do my best to focus on the dharma on a daily basis. If I read correctly what the sutras you have quoted say then I can dilute my 'evil deed' to the point of non-existence (like the salt in the Ganges) by expanding my immersion in the teachings. Is the right?

                    – Eugene
                    Apr 4 at 17:31





                    An excellent and very appropriate answer for me personally @ruben2020. I do not always do my best to focus on the dharma on a daily basis. If I read correctly what the sutras you have quoted say then I can dilute my 'evil deed' to the point of non-existence (like the salt in the Ganges) by expanding my immersion in the teachings. Is the right?

                    – Eugene
                    Apr 4 at 17:31

















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Buddhism Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbuddhism.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f31747%2fwhat-is-the-process-for-cleansing-a-very-negative-action%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Adding axes to figuresAdding axes labels to LaTeX figuresLaTeX equivalent of ConTeXt buffersRotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?adding axes to shapesAlign axes across subfiguresAdding figures with a certain orderLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themAdding axes labels to LaTeX figures

                    Luettelo Yhdysvaltain laivaston lentotukialuksista Lähteet | Navigointivalikko

                    Gary (muusikko) Sisällysluettelo Historia | Rockin' High | Lähteet | Aiheesta muualla | NavigointivalikkoInfobox OKTuomas "Gary" Keskinen Ancaran kitaristiksiProjekti Rockin' High