Is there a way to bypass a component in series in a circuit if that component fails? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 11:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)What does this component do in this series pass regulatorSeries and Parallel CircuitSimplifying Series/ Parallel RC circuitled wont turn on in series circuitHow to determine total circuit voltage and individual component resistance for a series circuitSeries parallel resistor. Circuit redrawCircuit redraw. Series and parallel resistors240v Split phase series circuitSeries RL Circuit Transient AnalysisIf the order of any component is altered in a series circuit, will the total voltage be affected?

Why can't devices on different VLANs, but on the same subnet, communicate?

Drawing vertical/oblique lines in Metrical tree (tikz-qtree, tipa)

How to design a circuit to convert 100 mV and 50 Hz Sine wave to square wave?

Why are PDP-7-style microprogrammed instructions out of vogue?

Word to describe a time interval

How did passengers keep warm on sail ships?

Variable with quotation marks "$()"

Is every episode of "Where are my Pants?" identical?

Using `min_active_rowversion` for global temporary tables

How to substitute curly brackets with round brackets in a grid of list

Do working physicists consider Newtonian mechanics to be "falsified"?

Why did Peik Lin say, "I'm not an animal"?

Why can I use a list index as an indexing variable in a for loop?

How to read αἱμύλιος or when to aspirate

Student Loan from years ago pops up and is taking my salary

Do ℕ, mathbbN, BbbN, symbbN effectively differ, and is there a "canonical" specification of the naturals?

Pretty sure I'm over complicating my loops but unsure how to simplify

Does the ranger's Archery Fighting Style apply to the monk's Deflect Missiles feature, for a multiclassed monk/ranger?

Why don't hard Brexiteers insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?

Free operad over a monoid object

How many cones with angle theta can I pack into the unit sphere?

Quantum Toffoli gate equation

How to politely respond to generic emails requesting a PhD/job in my lab? Without wasting too much time

Did the UK government pay "millions and millions of dollars" to try to snag Julian Assange?



Is there a way to bypass a component in series in a circuit if that component fails?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 11:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)What does this component do in this series pass regulatorSeries and Parallel CircuitSimplifying Series/ Parallel RC circuitled wont turn on in series circuitHow to determine total circuit voltage and individual component resistance for a series circuitSeries parallel resistor. Circuit redrawCircuit redraw. Series and parallel resistors240v Split phase series circuitSeries RL Circuit Transient AnalysisIf the order of any component is altered in a series circuit, will the total voltage be affected?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1












$begingroup$


Imagine a couple of speakers connected in series. Could there be a way to build such circuit with the ability to close the circuit if one component isn't working anymore? Like a different path that ignores the malfunctioning component, maybe using a voltmeter to trigger a switch in the circuit when it reads zero.



(just a question I'd given my electronics teacher in class. He failed to give me an answer)










share|improve this question









$endgroup$


















    1












    $begingroup$


    Imagine a couple of speakers connected in series. Could there be a way to build such circuit with the ability to close the circuit if one component isn't working anymore? Like a different path that ignores the malfunctioning component, maybe using a voltmeter to trigger a switch in the circuit when it reads zero.



    (just a question I'd given my electronics teacher in class. He failed to give me an answer)










    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Imagine a couple of speakers connected in series. Could there be a way to build such circuit with the ability to close the circuit if one component isn't working anymore? Like a different path that ignores the malfunctioning component, maybe using a voltmeter to trigger a switch in the circuit when it reads zero.



      (just a question I'd given my electronics teacher in class. He failed to give me an answer)










      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Imagine a couple of speakers connected in series. Could there be a way to build such circuit with the ability to close the circuit if one component isn't working anymore? Like a different path that ignores the malfunctioning component, maybe using a voltmeter to trigger a switch in the circuit when it reads zero.



      (just a question I'd given my electronics teacher in class. He failed to give me an answer)







      series






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Mar 30 at 10:58









      InTheMoodForNowInTheMoodForNow

      203




      203




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$


          Is there a way to bypass a component in series in a circuit if that component fails?




          This depends on the cost of failure, the failure mode and the ease of detection and safety consequences and the cost of solutions.



          There exist some examples of this already where it is feasible.



          • mini bulb strings, a spring-loaded bypass-switch closes when the filament burns out.

          • battery management system (BMS) chips bypass excess charge current for each cell due to mismatch to extend life and prevent failure.

          • some LED drivers have string open detection to detect and/or bypass individual without excess current.

          • "diode OR" logic is also "current rectifier" to allow standby power from the battery during a power failure

          • AC grid fault detection systems have re-routing switch methods for some fault conditions

          • The internet was designed with redundant paths where a "switch" is just one unit in a system.

          Yes/No/Maybe



          That depends on a lot of unstated assumptions, which one can specify by questions.



          What kind of component or failure? Open? , short? or in between?

          Will it reduce reliability? e.g. bypass a fuse

          Is it worth it? Cost/benefit for an added detector, multiplexer to bypass

          Is it better to choose a more reliable part, design or process in the 1st place?

          What if bypassing that component damages the previous or next?

          What if the circuit detecting a failure is less reliable, fails and bypasses in error?

          What is the expected mean time between failures MTBF? and to repair MTTR?






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for this!
            $endgroup$
            – InTheMoodForNow
            Mar 30 at 16:40


















          3












          $begingroup$

          It's possible in certain circumstances but generally not. In your speaker example imagine what would happen when there is no sound being transmitted: all series speakers would short out and the amplifier is now driving a short-circuit.



          Filament bulb series-connected Christmas tree lights have a mechanism whereby failed bulbs are shorted out. Truebeard's Stumper explains this mechanism:




          [Inside the bulb there is a shunt resistor.] It consists merely of a piece of OXIDIZED aluminum wire, wrapped around the lead-in wires, just above the bead in the lamp. At normal operating voltage (2.5 volts for 50-100 light sets ...), the oxide coating acts as an insulator, and the current goes through the filament. But when a lamp burns out, There is an OPEN CIRCUIT, and, in all series wiring, that puts the FULL LINE VOLTAGE across the defective lamp, and the 120 volts will "BURN" through the extremely thin oxide coating on the shunt, causing the shunt to actually short the lamp out. (This is exactly the same effect as twisting the lamp to short the wires together!) This completes the circuit, and the set lights.




          Note that this increases the voltage applied to the rest of the set and an accelerating cascade of bulb failures will (eventually) follow.



          Another example you can research is runway lighting. Rather than parallel all the lamps, which would result in gradual voltage drop along the runway, the lamps are fed from transformers and the transformer primaries are series connected and a controlled current sent down the line. You can research this yourself to see how faults are handled.



          In general your scheme isn't going to work. Shorting out series connected loads means that the remaining loads get higher voltage than they should and damage will ensue. In addition there is the problem of how to energise the switch to reset the device on power-on. If the device has shorted itself out there is no way for it to power itself back on.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            In the loudspeaker example, wouldn't the switch replace the faulty speaker with a resistor of the same value as the resistance of the speaker?
            $endgroup$
            – HandyHowie
            Mar 30 at 13:35










          • $begingroup$
            That's an option I hadn't considered. You might have an answer there.
            $endgroup$
            – Transistor
            Mar 30 at 13:48


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Sure, if you are able to detect when a device fails and you have the possibility to switch it off (e.g. with a mosfet) you can achieve this by actively controlling the device. But how you would do this in concrete depends on the kind of device we're talking about. In case of (e.g.) an led this might be trivial as a failure will usually result in an open circuit which is easy to detect. Concerning a speaker it will be more difficult to detect, speakers naturally have a low resistance/impedance and might become a short circuit if the fail completely. But even before an entire failure the sound quality might decrease without a significant change in the basic specs of this speaker.
          As stated, in generally you only need to detect a failure and be able to switch off the device.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
            StackExchange.schematics.init();
            );
            , "cicuitlab");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "135"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f429801%2fis-there-a-way-to-bypass-a-component-in-series-in-a-circuit-if-that-component-fa%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3












            $begingroup$


            Is there a way to bypass a component in series in a circuit if that component fails?




            This depends on the cost of failure, the failure mode and the ease of detection and safety consequences and the cost of solutions.



            There exist some examples of this already where it is feasible.



            • mini bulb strings, a spring-loaded bypass-switch closes when the filament burns out.

            • battery management system (BMS) chips bypass excess charge current for each cell due to mismatch to extend life and prevent failure.

            • some LED drivers have string open detection to detect and/or bypass individual without excess current.

            • "diode OR" logic is also "current rectifier" to allow standby power from the battery during a power failure

            • AC grid fault detection systems have re-routing switch methods for some fault conditions

            • The internet was designed with redundant paths where a "switch" is just one unit in a system.

            Yes/No/Maybe



            That depends on a lot of unstated assumptions, which one can specify by questions.



            What kind of component or failure? Open? , short? or in between?

            Will it reduce reliability? e.g. bypass a fuse

            Is it worth it? Cost/benefit for an added detector, multiplexer to bypass

            Is it better to choose a more reliable part, design or process in the 1st place?

            What if bypassing that component damages the previous or next?

            What if the circuit detecting a failure is less reliable, fails and bypasses in error?

            What is the expected mean time between failures MTBF? and to repair MTTR?






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for this!
              $endgroup$
              – InTheMoodForNow
              Mar 30 at 16:40















            3












            $begingroup$


            Is there a way to bypass a component in series in a circuit if that component fails?




            This depends on the cost of failure, the failure mode and the ease of detection and safety consequences and the cost of solutions.



            There exist some examples of this already where it is feasible.



            • mini bulb strings, a spring-loaded bypass-switch closes when the filament burns out.

            • battery management system (BMS) chips bypass excess charge current for each cell due to mismatch to extend life and prevent failure.

            • some LED drivers have string open detection to detect and/or bypass individual without excess current.

            • "diode OR" logic is also "current rectifier" to allow standby power from the battery during a power failure

            • AC grid fault detection systems have re-routing switch methods for some fault conditions

            • The internet was designed with redundant paths where a "switch" is just one unit in a system.

            Yes/No/Maybe



            That depends on a lot of unstated assumptions, which one can specify by questions.



            What kind of component or failure? Open? , short? or in between?

            Will it reduce reliability? e.g. bypass a fuse

            Is it worth it? Cost/benefit for an added detector, multiplexer to bypass

            Is it better to choose a more reliable part, design or process in the 1st place?

            What if bypassing that component damages the previous or next?

            What if the circuit detecting a failure is less reliable, fails and bypasses in error?

            What is the expected mean time between failures MTBF? and to repair MTTR?






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for this!
              $endgroup$
              – InTheMoodForNow
              Mar 30 at 16:40













            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$


            Is there a way to bypass a component in series in a circuit if that component fails?




            This depends on the cost of failure, the failure mode and the ease of detection and safety consequences and the cost of solutions.



            There exist some examples of this already where it is feasible.



            • mini bulb strings, a spring-loaded bypass-switch closes when the filament burns out.

            • battery management system (BMS) chips bypass excess charge current for each cell due to mismatch to extend life and prevent failure.

            • some LED drivers have string open detection to detect and/or bypass individual without excess current.

            • "diode OR" logic is also "current rectifier" to allow standby power from the battery during a power failure

            • AC grid fault detection systems have re-routing switch methods for some fault conditions

            • The internet was designed with redundant paths where a "switch" is just one unit in a system.

            Yes/No/Maybe



            That depends on a lot of unstated assumptions, which one can specify by questions.



            What kind of component or failure? Open? , short? or in between?

            Will it reduce reliability? e.g. bypass a fuse

            Is it worth it? Cost/benefit for an added detector, multiplexer to bypass

            Is it better to choose a more reliable part, design or process in the 1st place?

            What if bypassing that component damages the previous or next?

            What if the circuit detecting a failure is less reliable, fails and bypasses in error?

            What is the expected mean time between failures MTBF? and to repair MTTR?






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$




            Is there a way to bypass a component in series in a circuit if that component fails?




            This depends on the cost of failure, the failure mode and the ease of detection and safety consequences and the cost of solutions.



            There exist some examples of this already where it is feasible.



            • mini bulb strings, a spring-loaded bypass-switch closes when the filament burns out.

            • battery management system (BMS) chips bypass excess charge current for each cell due to mismatch to extend life and prevent failure.

            • some LED drivers have string open detection to detect and/or bypass individual without excess current.

            • "diode OR" logic is also "current rectifier" to allow standby power from the battery during a power failure

            • AC grid fault detection systems have re-routing switch methods for some fault conditions

            • The internet was designed with redundant paths where a "switch" is just one unit in a system.

            Yes/No/Maybe



            That depends on a lot of unstated assumptions, which one can specify by questions.



            What kind of component or failure? Open? , short? or in between?

            Will it reduce reliability? e.g. bypass a fuse

            Is it worth it? Cost/benefit for an added detector, multiplexer to bypass

            Is it better to choose a more reliable part, design or process in the 1st place?

            What if bypassing that component damages the previous or next?

            What if the circuit detecting a failure is less reliable, fails and bypasses in error?

            What is the expected mean time between failures MTBF? and to repair MTTR?







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Mar 30 at 16:38









            Sunnyskyguy EE75Sunnyskyguy EE75

            71.5k227103




            71.5k227103











            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for this!
              $endgroup$
              – InTheMoodForNow
              Mar 30 at 16:40
















            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for this!
              $endgroup$
              – InTheMoodForNow
              Mar 30 at 16:40















            $begingroup$
            Thank you for this!
            $endgroup$
            – InTheMoodForNow
            Mar 30 at 16:40




            $begingroup$
            Thank you for this!
            $endgroup$
            – InTheMoodForNow
            Mar 30 at 16:40













            3












            $begingroup$

            It's possible in certain circumstances but generally not. In your speaker example imagine what would happen when there is no sound being transmitted: all series speakers would short out and the amplifier is now driving a short-circuit.



            Filament bulb series-connected Christmas tree lights have a mechanism whereby failed bulbs are shorted out. Truebeard's Stumper explains this mechanism:




            [Inside the bulb there is a shunt resistor.] It consists merely of a piece of OXIDIZED aluminum wire, wrapped around the lead-in wires, just above the bead in the lamp. At normal operating voltage (2.5 volts for 50-100 light sets ...), the oxide coating acts as an insulator, and the current goes through the filament. But when a lamp burns out, There is an OPEN CIRCUIT, and, in all series wiring, that puts the FULL LINE VOLTAGE across the defective lamp, and the 120 volts will "BURN" through the extremely thin oxide coating on the shunt, causing the shunt to actually short the lamp out. (This is exactly the same effect as twisting the lamp to short the wires together!) This completes the circuit, and the set lights.




            Note that this increases the voltage applied to the rest of the set and an accelerating cascade of bulb failures will (eventually) follow.



            Another example you can research is runway lighting. Rather than parallel all the lamps, which would result in gradual voltage drop along the runway, the lamps are fed from transformers and the transformer primaries are series connected and a controlled current sent down the line. You can research this yourself to see how faults are handled.



            In general your scheme isn't going to work. Shorting out series connected loads means that the remaining loads get higher voltage than they should and damage will ensue. In addition there is the problem of how to energise the switch to reset the device on power-on. If the device has shorted itself out there is no way for it to power itself back on.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              In the loudspeaker example, wouldn't the switch replace the faulty speaker with a resistor of the same value as the resistance of the speaker?
              $endgroup$
              – HandyHowie
              Mar 30 at 13:35










            • $begingroup$
              That's an option I hadn't considered. You might have an answer there.
              $endgroup$
              – Transistor
              Mar 30 at 13:48















            3












            $begingroup$

            It's possible in certain circumstances but generally not. In your speaker example imagine what would happen when there is no sound being transmitted: all series speakers would short out and the amplifier is now driving a short-circuit.



            Filament bulb series-connected Christmas tree lights have a mechanism whereby failed bulbs are shorted out. Truebeard's Stumper explains this mechanism:




            [Inside the bulb there is a shunt resistor.] It consists merely of a piece of OXIDIZED aluminum wire, wrapped around the lead-in wires, just above the bead in the lamp. At normal operating voltage (2.5 volts for 50-100 light sets ...), the oxide coating acts as an insulator, and the current goes through the filament. But when a lamp burns out, There is an OPEN CIRCUIT, and, in all series wiring, that puts the FULL LINE VOLTAGE across the defective lamp, and the 120 volts will "BURN" through the extremely thin oxide coating on the shunt, causing the shunt to actually short the lamp out. (This is exactly the same effect as twisting the lamp to short the wires together!) This completes the circuit, and the set lights.




            Note that this increases the voltage applied to the rest of the set and an accelerating cascade of bulb failures will (eventually) follow.



            Another example you can research is runway lighting. Rather than parallel all the lamps, which would result in gradual voltage drop along the runway, the lamps are fed from transformers and the transformer primaries are series connected and a controlled current sent down the line. You can research this yourself to see how faults are handled.



            In general your scheme isn't going to work. Shorting out series connected loads means that the remaining loads get higher voltage than they should and damage will ensue. In addition there is the problem of how to energise the switch to reset the device on power-on. If the device has shorted itself out there is no way for it to power itself back on.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              In the loudspeaker example, wouldn't the switch replace the faulty speaker with a resistor of the same value as the resistance of the speaker?
              $endgroup$
              – HandyHowie
              Mar 30 at 13:35










            • $begingroup$
              That's an option I hadn't considered. You might have an answer there.
              $endgroup$
              – Transistor
              Mar 30 at 13:48













            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            It's possible in certain circumstances but generally not. In your speaker example imagine what would happen when there is no sound being transmitted: all series speakers would short out and the amplifier is now driving a short-circuit.



            Filament bulb series-connected Christmas tree lights have a mechanism whereby failed bulbs are shorted out. Truebeard's Stumper explains this mechanism:




            [Inside the bulb there is a shunt resistor.] It consists merely of a piece of OXIDIZED aluminum wire, wrapped around the lead-in wires, just above the bead in the lamp. At normal operating voltage (2.5 volts for 50-100 light sets ...), the oxide coating acts as an insulator, and the current goes through the filament. But when a lamp burns out, There is an OPEN CIRCUIT, and, in all series wiring, that puts the FULL LINE VOLTAGE across the defective lamp, and the 120 volts will "BURN" through the extremely thin oxide coating on the shunt, causing the shunt to actually short the lamp out. (This is exactly the same effect as twisting the lamp to short the wires together!) This completes the circuit, and the set lights.




            Note that this increases the voltage applied to the rest of the set and an accelerating cascade of bulb failures will (eventually) follow.



            Another example you can research is runway lighting. Rather than parallel all the lamps, which would result in gradual voltage drop along the runway, the lamps are fed from transformers and the transformer primaries are series connected and a controlled current sent down the line. You can research this yourself to see how faults are handled.



            In general your scheme isn't going to work. Shorting out series connected loads means that the remaining loads get higher voltage than they should and damage will ensue. In addition there is the problem of how to energise the switch to reset the device on power-on. If the device has shorted itself out there is no way for it to power itself back on.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            It's possible in certain circumstances but generally not. In your speaker example imagine what would happen when there is no sound being transmitted: all series speakers would short out and the amplifier is now driving a short-circuit.



            Filament bulb series-connected Christmas tree lights have a mechanism whereby failed bulbs are shorted out. Truebeard's Stumper explains this mechanism:




            [Inside the bulb there is a shunt resistor.] It consists merely of a piece of OXIDIZED aluminum wire, wrapped around the lead-in wires, just above the bead in the lamp. At normal operating voltage (2.5 volts for 50-100 light sets ...), the oxide coating acts as an insulator, and the current goes through the filament. But when a lamp burns out, There is an OPEN CIRCUIT, and, in all series wiring, that puts the FULL LINE VOLTAGE across the defective lamp, and the 120 volts will "BURN" through the extremely thin oxide coating on the shunt, causing the shunt to actually short the lamp out. (This is exactly the same effect as twisting the lamp to short the wires together!) This completes the circuit, and the set lights.




            Note that this increases the voltage applied to the rest of the set and an accelerating cascade of bulb failures will (eventually) follow.



            Another example you can research is runway lighting. Rather than parallel all the lamps, which would result in gradual voltage drop along the runway, the lamps are fed from transformers and the transformer primaries are series connected and a controlled current sent down the line. You can research this yourself to see how faults are handled.



            In general your scheme isn't going to work. Shorting out series connected loads means that the remaining loads get higher voltage than they should and damage will ensue. In addition there is the problem of how to energise the switch to reset the device on power-on. If the device has shorted itself out there is no way for it to power itself back on.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Mar 30 at 11:21









            TransistorTransistor

            88.5k785190




            88.5k785190











            • $begingroup$
              In the loudspeaker example, wouldn't the switch replace the faulty speaker with a resistor of the same value as the resistance of the speaker?
              $endgroup$
              – HandyHowie
              Mar 30 at 13:35










            • $begingroup$
              That's an option I hadn't considered. You might have an answer there.
              $endgroup$
              – Transistor
              Mar 30 at 13:48
















            • $begingroup$
              In the loudspeaker example, wouldn't the switch replace the faulty speaker with a resistor of the same value as the resistance of the speaker?
              $endgroup$
              – HandyHowie
              Mar 30 at 13:35










            • $begingroup$
              That's an option I hadn't considered. You might have an answer there.
              $endgroup$
              – Transistor
              Mar 30 at 13:48















            $begingroup$
            In the loudspeaker example, wouldn't the switch replace the faulty speaker with a resistor of the same value as the resistance of the speaker?
            $endgroup$
            – HandyHowie
            Mar 30 at 13:35




            $begingroup$
            In the loudspeaker example, wouldn't the switch replace the faulty speaker with a resistor of the same value as the resistance of the speaker?
            $endgroup$
            – HandyHowie
            Mar 30 at 13:35












            $begingroup$
            That's an option I hadn't considered. You might have an answer there.
            $endgroup$
            – Transistor
            Mar 30 at 13:48




            $begingroup$
            That's an option I hadn't considered. You might have an answer there.
            $endgroup$
            – Transistor
            Mar 30 at 13:48











            1












            $begingroup$

            Sure, if you are able to detect when a device fails and you have the possibility to switch it off (e.g. with a mosfet) you can achieve this by actively controlling the device. But how you would do this in concrete depends on the kind of device we're talking about. In case of (e.g.) an led this might be trivial as a failure will usually result in an open circuit which is easy to detect. Concerning a speaker it will be more difficult to detect, speakers naturally have a low resistance/impedance and might become a short circuit if the fail completely. But even before an entire failure the sound quality might decrease without a significant change in the basic specs of this speaker.
            As stated, in generally you only need to detect a failure and be able to switch off the device.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$

















              1












              $begingroup$

              Sure, if you are able to detect when a device fails and you have the possibility to switch it off (e.g. with a mosfet) you can achieve this by actively controlling the device. But how you would do this in concrete depends on the kind of device we're talking about. In case of (e.g.) an led this might be trivial as a failure will usually result in an open circuit which is easy to detect. Concerning a speaker it will be more difficult to detect, speakers naturally have a low resistance/impedance and might become a short circuit if the fail completely. But even before an entire failure the sound quality might decrease without a significant change in the basic specs of this speaker.
              As stated, in generally you only need to detect a failure and be able to switch off the device.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                Sure, if you are able to detect when a device fails and you have the possibility to switch it off (e.g. with a mosfet) you can achieve this by actively controlling the device. But how you would do this in concrete depends on the kind of device we're talking about. In case of (e.g.) an led this might be trivial as a failure will usually result in an open circuit which is easy to detect. Concerning a speaker it will be more difficult to detect, speakers naturally have a low resistance/impedance and might become a short circuit if the fail completely. But even before an entire failure the sound quality might decrease without a significant change in the basic specs of this speaker.
                As stated, in generally you only need to detect a failure and be able to switch off the device.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                Sure, if you are able to detect when a device fails and you have the possibility to switch it off (e.g. with a mosfet) you can achieve this by actively controlling the device. But how you would do this in concrete depends on the kind of device we're talking about. In case of (e.g.) an led this might be trivial as a failure will usually result in an open circuit which is easy to detect. Concerning a speaker it will be more difficult to detect, speakers naturally have a low resistance/impedance and might become a short circuit if the fail completely. But even before an entire failure the sound quality might decrease without a significant change in the basic specs of this speaker.
                As stated, in generally you only need to detect a failure and be able to switch off the device.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Mar 30 at 20:35

























                answered Mar 30 at 11:11









                Sim SonSim Son

                12310




                12310



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f429801%2fis-there-a-way-to-bypass-a-component-in-series-in-a-circuit-if-that-component-fa%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Adding axes to figuresAdding axes labels to LaTeX figuresLaTeX equivalent of ConTeXt buffersRotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?adding axes to shapesAlign axes across subfiguresAdding figures with a certain orderLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themAdding axes labels to LaTeX figures

                    Luettelo Yhdysvaltain laivaston lentotukialuksista Lähteet | Navigointivalikko

                    Gary (muusikko) Sisällysluettelo Historia | Rockin' High | Lähteet | Aiheesta muualla | NavigointivalikkoInfobox OKTuomas "Gary" Keskinen Ancaran kitaristiksiProjekti Rockin' High