Efficient self study plan Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) 2019 Moderator Election Q&A - Questionnaire 2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsEfficient dynamic clusteringHow to create Self learning data productHow to self-learn data science?How to approach a Data Science case study question?Classification with millions of records, thousands of categories - keep memory use efficient?recommendations for self-study in ML/Deep Learning/the underlying mathLongitudinal study - conversion long to wide - implicationsHow to plan a model analysis that avoids overfitting?Feasibility study of machine learning

Special flights

NERDTreeMenu Remapping

What are the main differences between Stargate SG-1 cuts?

What is the origin of 落第?

Does any scripture mention that forms of God or Goddess are symbolic?

New Order #6: Easter Egg

After Sam didn't return home in the end, were he and Al still friends?

How much damage would a cupful of neutron star matter do to the Earth?

Is openssl rand command cryptographically secure?

What does 丫 mean? 丫是什么意思?

Central Vacuuming: Is it worth it, and how does it compare to normal vacuuming?

Why is a lens darker than other ones when applying the same settings?

How does the math work when buying airline miles?

Getting out of while loop on console

Show current row "win streak"

RSA find public exponent

Tips to organize LaTeX presentations for a semester

Universal covering space of the real projective line?

Should a wizard buy fine inks every time he want to copy spells into his spellbook?

What does it mean that physics no longer uses mechanical models to describe phenomena?

In musical terms, what properties are varied by the human voice to produce different words / syllables?

Why complex landing gears are used instead of simple,reliability and light weight muscle wire or shape memory alloys?

If Windows 7 doesn't support WSL, then what is "Subsystem for UNIX-based Applications"?

What adaptations would allow standard fantasy dwarves to survive in the desert?



Efficient self study plan



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
2019 Moderator Election Q&A - Questionnaire
2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsEfficient dynamic clusteringHow to create Self learning data productHow to self-learn data science?How to approach a Data Science case study question?Classification with millions of records, thousands of categories - keep memory use efficient?recommendations for self-study in ML/Deep Learning/the underlying mathLongitudinal study - conversion long to wide - implicationsHow to plan a model analysis that avoids overfitting?Feasibility study of machine learning










2












$begingroup$


I am hoping for a bit of guidance from experienced practitioners / academics.



I want to work through the Bishop ML book, but have minimal background.



What is the fastest way to get the pre-requisites (specific books would be appreciated)?



From searching around I found this potential self-study path:



  • Statistical Inference - Casella / Berger


  • Probability Theory and Examples - Durrett


  • Linear Algebra - Hoffman / Kunze


I checked these books out from the library, but they will take me over a year to work through thoroughly, so it does not seem to be practical.



I have searched around on the internet, but most of the advice doesn't list any specific books, just what subjects I should learn.



About me



  • Graduated in an unrelated discipline many years ago


  • Willing to dedicate many hours to this (I am doing this to build a background for a degree in machine learning)


  • I can code pretty well due to my job










share|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    2












    $begingroup$


    I am hoping for a bit of guidance from experienced practitioners / academics.



    I want to work through the Bishop ML book, but have minimal background.



    What is the fastest way to get the pre-requisites (specific books would be appreciated)?



    From searching around I found this potential self-study path:



    • Statistical Inference - Casella / Berger


    • Probability Theory and Examples - Durrett


    • Linear Algebra - Hoffman / Kunze


    I checked these books out from the library, but they will take me over a year to work through thoroughly, so it does not seem to be practical.



    I have searched around on the internet, but most of the advice doesn't list any specific books, just what subjects I should learn.



    About me



    • Graduated in an unrelated discipline many years ago


    • Willing to dedicate many hours to this (I am doing this to build a background for a degree in machine learning)


    • I can code pretty well due to my job










    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2


      1



      $begingroup$


      I am hoping for a bit of guidance from experienced practitioners / academics.



      I want to work through the Bishop ML book, but have minimal background.



      What is the fastest way to get the pre-requisites (specific books would be appreciated)?



      From searching around I found this potential self-study path:



      • Statistical Inference - Casella / Berger


      • Probability Theory and Examples - Durrett


      • Linear Algebra - Hoffman / Kunze


      I checked these books out from the library, but they will take me over a year to work through thoroughly, so it does not seem to be practical.



      I have searched around on the internet, but most of the advice doesn't list any specific books, just what subjects I should learn.



      About me



      • Graduated in an unrelated discipline many years ago


      • Willing to dedicate many hours to this (I am doing this to build a background for a degree in machine learning)


      • I can code pretty well due to my job










      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I am hoping for a bit of guidance from experienced practitioners / academics.



      I want to work through the Bishop ML book, but have minimal background.



      What is the fastest way to get the pre-requisites (specific books would be appreciated)?



      From searching around I found this potential self-study path:



      • Statistical Inference - Casella / Berger


      • Probability Theory and Examples - Durrett


      • Linear Algebra - Hoffman / Kunze


      I checked these books out from the library, but they will take me over a year to work through thoroughly, so it does not seem to be practical.



      I have searched around on the internet, but most of the advice doesn't list any specific books, just what subjects I should learn.



      About me



      • Graduated in an unrelated discipline many years ago


      • Willing to dedicate many hours to this (I am doing this to build a background for a degree in machine learning)


      • I can code pretty well due to my job







      machine-learning statistics self-study mathematics






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Apr 4 at 10:28









      Convex RomanceConvex Romance

      133




      133




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          I'm not super familiar with Bishop, but it looks like Durrett, which deals with measure-theoretic probability, would be overkill. Plus you would probably have to add real analysis to your prerequisites. I would just work through the first 4-5 Casella chapters on probability and random variables.



          You probably also don't need to go through the whole linear algebra book to get started. Just make sure you understand the basic matrix operations well enough to deal with multivariate calculus (ex. taking multivariate derivatives and computing multivariate integrals).



          The second half of Casella would likely be useful, but I suspect not strictly necessary.



          I think if you can handle those things you'll have most of Bishop covered; you can always pick up more as needed.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks this makes a lot more sense. Since I there are a lot of "unknown unknowns" in terms of knowledge for me, having a clear answer like this is very helpful.
            $endgroup$
            – Convex Romance
            Apr 5 at 9:30











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "557"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f48602%2fefficient-self-study-plan%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0












          $begingroup$

          I'm not super familiar with Bishop, but it looks like Durrett, which deals with measure-theoretic probability, would be overkill. Plus you would probably have to add real analysis to your prerequisites. I would just work through the first 4-5 Casella chapters on probability and random variables.



          You probably also don't need to go through the whole linear algebra book to get started. Just make sure you understand the basic matrix operations well enough to deal with multivariate calculus (ex. taking multivariate derivatives and computing multivariate integrals).



          The second half of Casella would likely be useful, but I suspect not strictly necessary.



          I think if you can handle those things you'll have most of Bishop covered; you can always pick up more as needed.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks this makes a lot more sense. Since I there are a lot of "unknown unknowns" in terms of knowledge for me, having a clear answer like this is very helpful.
            $endgroup$
            – Convex Romance
            Apr 5 at 9:30















          0












          $begingroup$

          I'm not super familiar with Bishop, but it looks like Durrett, which deals with measure-theoretic probability, would be overkill. Plus you would probably have to add real analysis to your prerequisites. I would just work through the first 4-5 Casella chapters on probability and random variables.



          You probably also don't need to go through the whole linear algebra book to get started. Just make sure you understand the basic matrix operations well enough to deal with multivariate calculus (ex. taking multivariate derivatives and computing multivariate integrals).



          The second half of Casella would likely be useful, but I suspect not strictly necessary.



          I think if you can handle those things you'll have most of Bishop covered; you can always pick up more as needed.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Thanks this makes a lot more sense. Since I there are a lot of "unknown unknowns" in terms of knowledge for me, having a clear answer like this is very helpful.
            $endgroup$
            – Convex Romance
            Apr 5 at 9:30













          0












          0








          0





          $begingroup$

          I'm not super familiar with Bishop, but it looks like Durrett, which deals with measure-theoretic probability, would be overkill. Plus you would probably have to add real analysis to your prerequisites. I would just work through the first 4-5 Casella chapters on probability and random variables.



          You probably also don't need to go through the whole linear algebra book to get started. Just make sure you understand the basic matrix operations well enough to deal with multivariate calculus (ex. taking multivariate derivatives and computing multivariate integrals).



          The second half of Casella would likely be useful, but I suspect not strictly necessary.



          I think if you can handle those things you'll have most of Bishop covered; you can always pick up more as needed.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          I'm not super familiar with Bishop, but it looks like Durrett, which deals with measure-theoretic probability, would be overkill. Plus you would probably have to add real analysis to your prerequisites. I would just work through the first 4-5 Casella chapters on probability and random variables.



          You probably also don't need to go through the whole linear algebra book to get started. Just make sure you understand the basic matrix operations well enough to deal with multivariate calculus (ex. taking multivariate derivatives and computing multivariate integrals).



          The second half of Casella would likely be useful, but I suspect not strictly necessary.



          I think if you can handle those things you'll have most of Bishop covered; you can always pick up more as needed.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Apr 4 at 23:37









          Unrefracted_HooloovooUnrefracted_Hooloovoo

          262




          262











          • $begingroup$
            Thanks this makes a lot more sense. Since I there are a lot of "unknown unknowns" in terms of knowledge for me, having a clear answer like this is very helpful.
            $endgroup$
            – Convex Romance
            Apr 5 at 9:30
















          • $begingroup$
            Thanks this makes a lot more sense. Since I there are a lot of "unknown unknowns" in terms of knowledge for me, having a clear answer like this is very helpful.
            $endgroup$
            – Convex Romance
            Apr 5 at 9:30















          $begingroup$
          Thanks this makes a lot more sense. Since I there are a lot of "unknown unknowns" in terms of knowledge for me, having a clear answer like this is very helpful.
          $endgroup$
          – Convex Romance
          Apr 5 at 9:30




          $begingroup$
          Thanks this makes a lot more sense. Since I there are a lot of "unknown unknowns" in terms of knowledge for me, having a clear answer like this is very helpful.
          $endgroup$
          – Convex Romance
          Apr 5 at 9:30

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f48602%2fefficient-self-study-plan%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Adding axes to figuresAdding axes labels to LaTeX figuresLaTeX equivalent of ConTeXt buffersRotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?adding axes to shapesAlign axes across subfiguresAdding figures with a certain orderLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themAdding axes labels to LaTeX figures

          Luettelo Yhdysvaltain laivaston lentotukialuksista Lähteet | Navigointivalikko

          Gary (muusikko) Sisällysluettelo Historia | Rockin' High | Lähteet | Aiheesta muualla | NavigointivalikkoInfobox OKTuomas "Gary" Keskinen Ancaran kitaristiksiProjekti Rockin' High