How can we prove that any integral in the set of non-elementary integrals cannot be expressed in the form of elementary functions?How can you prove that a function has no closed form integral?Can every definite integral be expressed as a combination of elementary functions?Showing that an integral can not be expressed in terms of elementary functionsRepresent an Integral by non-elementary functionsWhat does it mean when an integral cannot be solved in terms of elementary functions?Prove that primitives of $fracx^3rm e^x - 1$ have no closed form in terms of elementary functionsCan you add new functions to the set of elementary functions such that every function has an anti-derivative?Can a change of variable result in the evaluation of an integral in terms of elementary functions, whereas before the c.o.v. this was not possible?Can I create a set of new elementary functions such that their integral is an elementary function?How to prove $int frac1(xsin(x))^2,dx$ doesnt have an elementary closed form?

What are the differences between the usage of 'it' and 'they'?

Why doesn't H₄O²⁺ exist?

Can a Warlock become Neutral Good?

In Japanese, what’s the difference between “Tonari ni” (となりに) and “Tsugi” (つぎ)? When would you use one over the other?

Collect Fourier series terms

Why not use SQL instead of GraphQL?

What defenses are there against being summoned by the Gate spell?

Email Account under attack (really) - anything I can do?

Dragon forelimb placement

What's the point of deactivating Num Lock on login screens?

Is it tax fraud for an individual to declare non-taxable revenue as taxable income? (US tax laws)

How is the claim "I am in New York only if I am in America" the same as "If I am in New York, then I am in America?

Do I have a twin with permutated remainders?

How old can references or sources in a thesis be?

can i play a electric guitar through a bass amp?

Why was the small council so happy for Tyrion to become the Master of Coin?

Have astronauts in space suits ever taken selfies? If so, how?

Watching something be written to a file live with tail

Can I make popcorn with any corn?

Smoothness of finite-dimensional functional calculus

Python: next in for loop

Why doesn't Newton's third law mean a person bounces back to where they started when they hit the ground?

Why are electrically insulating heatsinks so rare? Is it just cost?

Why does Kotter return in Welcome Back Kotter?



How can we prove that any integral in the set of non-elementary integrals cannot be expressed in the form of elementary functions?


How can you prove that a function has no closed form integral?Can every definite integral be expressed as a combination of elementary functions?Showing that an integral can not be expressed in terms of elementary functionsRepresent an Integral by non-elementary functionsWhat does it mean when an integral cannot be solved in terms of elementary functions?Prove that primitives of $fracx^3rm e^x - 1$ have no closed form in terms of elementary functionsCan you add new functions to the set of elementary functions such that every function has an anti-derivative?Can a change of variable result in the evaluation of an integral in terms of elementary functions, whereas before the c.o.v. this was not possible?Can I create a set of new elementary functions such that their integral is an elementary function?How to prove $int frac1(xsin(x))^2,dx$ doesnt have an elementary closed form?













4












$begingroup$


We know that the derivative of some non-elementary functions can be expressed in elementary functions. For example $ fracddx Si(x)= fracsin(x)x $



So similarly are there any non-elementary functions whose integrals can be expressed in elementary functions?



If not then how can we prove that any integral in the set of non-elementary integrals cannot be expressed in the form of elementary functions?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Differential algebra is a galois like approach to proving such things. pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3d42/…
    $endgroup$
    – Charlie Frohman
    Mar 27 at 18:16















4












$begingroup$


We know that the derivative of some non-elementary functions can be expressed in elementary functions. For example $ fracddx Si(x)= fracsin(x)x $



So similarly are there any non-elementary functions whose integrals can be expressed in elementary functions?



If not then how can we prove that any integral in the set of non-elementary integrals cannot be expressed in the form of elementary functions?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Differential algebra is a galois like approach to proving such things. pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3d42/…
    $endgroup$
    – Charlie Frohman
    Mar 27 at 18:16













4












4








4


1



$begingroup$


We know that the derivative of some non-elementary functions can be expressed in elementary functions. For example $ fracddx Si(x)= fracsin(x)x $



So similarly are there any non-elementary functions whose integrals can be expressed in elementary functions?



If not then how can we prove that any integral in the set of non-elementary integrals cannot be expressed in the form of elementary functions?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




We know that the derivative of some non-elementary functions can be expressed in elementary functions. For example $ fracddx Si(x)= fracsin(x)x $



So similarly are there any non-elementary functions whose integrals can be expressed in elementary functions?



If not then how can we prove that any integral in the set of non-elementary integrals cannot be expressed in the form of elementary functions?







calculus integration proof-theory






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 27 at 18:20









Bernard

124k741116




124k741116










asked Mar 27 at 18:11









Rithik KapoorRithik Kapoor

33210




33210







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Differential algebra is a galois like approach to proving such things. pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3d42/…
    $endgroup$
    – Charlie Frohman
    Mar 27 at 18:16












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Differential algebra is a galois like approach to proving such things. pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3d42/…
    $endgroup$
    – Charlie Frohman
    Mar 27 at 18:16







2




2




$begingroup$
Differential algebra is a galois like approach to proving such things. pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3d42/…
$endgroup$
– Charlie Frohman
Mar 27 at 18:16




$begingroup$
Differential algebra is a galois like approach to proving such things. pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3d42/…
$endgroup$
– Charlie Frohman
Mar 27 at 18:16










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















10












$begingroup$

The derivative of an elementary function is an elementary function: the standard Calculus 1 differentiation methods can be used to find this derivative. So an antiderivative of a non-elementary function can't be elementary.



EDIT: More formally, by definition an elementary function is obtained from
complex constants and the variable $x$ by a finite number of steps of the following forms:



  1. If $f_1$ and $f_2$ are elementary functions, then $f_1 + f_2$, $f_1 f_2$ and (if $f_2 ne 0$) $f_1/f_2$ are elementary.

  2. If $P$ is a non-constant polynomial whose coefficients are elementary functions, then a function $f$ such that $P(f) = 0$ is an elementary function.

  3. If $g$ is an elementary function, then a function $f$ such that $f' = g' f$ or $f' = g'/g$ is elementary (this is how $e^g$ and $log g$ are elementary).

To prove that the derivative of an elementary function, you can use induction on the number of these steps. In the induction step, suppose
the result is true for elementary functions obtained in at most $n$ steps.
If $f$ can be obtained in $n+1$ steps, the last being $f = f_1 + f_2$ where $f_1$ and $f_2$ each require at most $n$ steps, then $f' = f_1' + f_2'$ where $f_1'$ and $f_2'$ are elementary, and therefore $f'$ is elementary. Similarly for the other possibilities for the last step.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Okay then how can we prove the derivative of an elementary function is always an elementary function?
    $endgroup$
    – Rithik Kapoor
    Mar 27 at 18:26










  • $begingroup$
    @RithikKapoor Frankly sir, common sense. Writing an explicit formal proof might be tricky but we already know that any composition of elementary functions can be handled with the chain, product, division, and addition rules. If you're asking how to formalize it, fair enough. However if you are asking "How do I know this is true" then it follows by simple observance.
    $endgroup$
    – The Great Duck
    Mar 28 at 0:28










  • $begingroup$
    Query. What if we include the Heaviside step function as an elementary function? Would this have any affect on the answer?
    $endgroup$
    – The Great Duck
    Mar 28 at 0:29










  • $begingroup$
    @TheGreatDuck, before anything else, what would you say about the function $fracx+sqrtx^22x$?
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is not a mathematician
    Mar 28 at 2:46










  • $begingroup$
    The Heaviside step function is elementary, according to (2), as it satisfies $f^2 - f = 0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Mar 28 at 3:01


















1












$begingroup$

No, the derivative of an elementary function is elementary; some integrals were defined specifically as the antiderivative of certain functions because that function otherwise would have no closed-form antiderivative.



An anti-derivative of a non-elementary function cannot be an elementary function.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    1












    $begingroup$

    Yes, and I can provide a simple counter-example.



    Let $f(x)$ be piece-wise defined such that $f(x) = x^2$ for $x neq 0$ and such that $f(0) = 300$.



    This is not an elementary function. However its integral is $F(x) = frac 13x^3 + c$ which is elementary.



    For a slightly more "non-elementary" example just make $f(x) = -500$ whenever $x$ is an integer multiple of $n = 0.0001$. Feel free to keep decreasing $n$ to make the function messier and messier.



    However, if you want a continuous non-elementary $f$ then no. If $f$ is continuous then by one of the fundamental theorems of calculus $F'(x) = f(x)$ and the derivative of an elementary function is an elementary function. Furthermore, if you want that $f$ is an integral of some other $h$ then it follows that $f$ is continuous as the integral of any real valued function defined everywhere is a continuous function. So this will only work with discontinuous $f$'s that are not integrals of other functions.



    In short the set of derivatives of elementary functions $neq$ the set of anti-integrals of elementary functions.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Why is a piecewise function with elementary cases not elementary?
      $endgroup$
      – J. M. is not a mathematician
      Mar 28 at 1:20










    • $begingroup$
      @J.M.isnotamathematician an infinite number of cases?
      $endgroup$
      – The Great Duck
      Mar 28 at 1:34






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I am talking about your second sentence. You give a quadratic function with a hole and say that it is nonelementary.
      $endgroup$
      – J. M. is not a mathematician
      Mar 28 at 1:43










    • $begingroup$
      @J.M.isnotamathematician As I said, there are much messier example and I gave one. The definition of elementary is tenuous at best. Provide a detailed analytical definition and I'll say whether something fits inside it. Until then, there's no real way to tell for sure. Elementary has imo always been a subjective concept. Regardless, I can easily keep cranking up the complexity on the counter-example so it doesn't change the result if I mis-identify some simpler function as being non-elementary.
      $endgroup$
      – The Great Duck
      Mar 28 at 1:47






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      "Elementary has imo always been a subjective concept." - in this regard at least, we are in agreement.
      $endgroup$
      – J. M. is not a mathematician
      Mar 28 at 1:55











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3164890%2fhow-can-we-prove-that-any-integral-in-the-set-of-non-elementary-integrals-cannot%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    10












    $begingroup$

    The derivative of an elementary function is an elementary function: the standard Calculus 1 differentiation methods can be used to find this derivative. So an antiderivative of a non-elementary function can't be elementary.



    EDIT: More formally, by definition an elementary function is obtained from
    complex constants and the variable $x$ by a finite number of steps of the following forms:



    1. If $f_1$ and $f_2$ are elementary functions, then $f_1 + f_2$, $f_1 f_2$ and (if $f_2 ne 0$) $f_1/f_2$ are elementary.

    2. If $P$ is a non-constant polynomial whose coefficients are elementary functions, then a function $f$ such that $P(f) = 0$ is an elementary function.

    3. If $g$ is an elementary function, then a function $f$ such that $f' = g' f$ or $f' = g'/g$ is elementary (this is how $e^g$ and $log g$ are elementary).

    To prove that the derivative of an elementary function, you can use induction on the number of these steps. In the induction step, suppose
    the result is true for elementary functions obtained in at most $n$ steps.
    If $f$ can be obtained in $n+1$ steps, the last being $f = f_1 + f_2$ where $f_1$ and $f_2$ each require at most $n$ steps, then $f' = f_1' + f_2'$ where $f_1'$ and $f_2'$ are elementary, and therefore $f'$ is elementary. Similarly for the other possibilities for the last step.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Okay then how can we prove the derivative of an elementary function is always an elementary function?
      $endgroup$
      – Rithik Kapoor
      Mar 27 at 18:26










    • $begingroup$
      @RithikKapoor Frankly sir, common sense. Writing an explicit formal proof might be tricky but we already know that any composition of elementary functions can be handled with the chain, product, division, and addition rules. If you're asking how to formalize it, fair enough. However if you are asking "How do I know this is true" then it follows by simple observance.
      $endgroup$
      – The Great Duck
      Mar 28 at 0:28










    • $begingroup$
      Query. What if we include the Heaviside step function as an elementary function? Would this have any affect on the answer?
      $endgroup$
      – The Great Duck
      Mar 28 at 0:29










    • $begingroup$
      @TheGreatDuck, before anything else, what would you say about the function $fracx+sqrtx^22x$?
      $endgroup$
      – J. M. is not a mathematician
      Mar 28 at 2:46










    • $begingroup$
      The Heaviside step function is elementary, according to (2), as it satisfies $f^2 - f = 0$.
      $endgroup$
      – Robert Israel
      Mar 28 at 3:01















    10












    $begingroup$

    The derivative of an elementary function is an elementary function: the standard Calculus 1 differentiation methods can be used to find this derivative. So an antiderivative of a non-elementary function can't be elementary.



    EDIT: More formally, by definition an elementary function is obtained from
    complex constants and the variable $x$ by a finite number of steps of the following forms:



    1. If $f_1$ and $f_2$ are elementary functions, then $f_1 + f_2$, $f_1 f_2$ and (if $f_2 ne 0$) $f_1/f_2$ are elementary.

    2. If $P$ is a non-constant polynomial whose coefficients are elementary functions, then a function $f$ such that $P(f) = 0$ is an elementary function.

    3. If $g$ is an elementary function, then a function $f$ such that $f' = g' f$ or $f' = g'/g$ is elementary (this is how $e^g$ and $log g$ are elementary).

    To prove that the derivative of an elementary function, you can use induction on the number of these steps. In the induction step, suppose
    the result is true for elementary functions obtained in at most $n$ steps.
    If $f$ can be obtained in $n+1$ steps, the last being $f = f_1 + f_2$ where $f_1$ and $f_2$ each require at most $n$ steps, then $f' = f_1' + f_2'$ where $f_1'$ and $f_2'$ are elementary, and therefore $f'$ is elementary. Similarly for the other possibilities for the last step.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Okay then how can we prove the derivative of an elementary function is always an elementary function?
      $endgroup$
      – Rithik Kapoor
      Mar 27 at 18:26










    • $begingroup$
      @RithikKapoor Frankly sir, common sense. Writing an explicit formal proof might be tricky but we already know that any composition of elementary functions can be handled with the chain, product, division, and addition rules. If you're asking how to formalize it, fair enough. However if you are asking "How do I know this is true" then it follows by simple observance.
      $endgroup$
      – The Great Duck
      Mar 28 at 0:28










    • $begingroup$
      Query. What if we include the Heaviside step function as an elementary function? Would this have any affect on the answer?
      $endgroup$
      – The Great Duck
      Mar 28 at 0:29










    • $begingroup$
      @TheGreatDuck, before anything else, what would you say about the function $fracx+sqrtx^22x$?
      $endgroup$
      – J. M. is not a mathematician
      Mar 28 at 2:46










    • $begingroup$
      The Heaviside step function is elementary, according to (2), as it satisfies $f^2 - f = 0$.
      $endgroup$
      – Robert Israel
      Mar 28 at 3:01













    10












    10








    10





    $begingroup$

    The derivative of an elementary function is an elementary function: the standard Calculus 1 differentiation methods can be used to find this derivative. So an antiderivative of a non-elementary function can't be elementary.



    EDIT: More formally, by definition an elementary function is obtained from
    complex constants and the variable $x$ by a finite number of steps of the following forms:



    1. If $f_1$ and $f_2$ are elementary functions, then $f_1 + f_2$, $f_1 f_2$ and (if $f_2 ne 0$) $f_1/f_2$ are elementary.

    2. If $P$ is a non-constant polynomial whose coefficients are elementary functions, then a function $f$ such that $P(f) = 0$ is an elementary function.

    3. If $g$ is an elementary function, then a function $f$ such that $f' = g' f$ or $f' = g'/g$ is elementary (this is how $e^g$ and $log g$ are elementary).

    To prove that the derivative of an elementary function, you can use induction on the number of these steps. In the induction step, suppose
    the result is true for elementary functions obtained in at most $n$ steps.
    If $f$ can be obtained in $n+1$ steps, the last being $f = f_1 + f_2$ where $f_1$ and $f_2$ each require at most $n$ steps, then $f' = f_1' + f_2'$ where $f_1'$ and $f_2'$ are elementary, and therefore $f'$ is elementary. Similarly for the other possibilities for the last step.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    The derivative of an elementary function is an elementary function: the standard Calculus 1 differentiation methods can be used to find this derivative. So an antiderivative of a non-elementary function can't be elementary.



    EDIT: More formally, by definition an elementary function is obtained from
    complex constants and the variable $x$ by a finite number of steps of the following forms:



    1. If $f_1$ and $f_2$ are elementary functions, then $f_1 + f_2$, $f_1 f_2$ and (if $f_2 ne 0$) $f_1/f_2$ are elementary.

    2. If $P$ is a non-constant polynomial whose coefficients are elementary functions, then a function $f$ such that $P(f) = 0$ is an elementary function.

    3. If $g$ is an elementary function, then a function $f$ such that $f' = g' f$ or $f' = g'/g$ is elementary (this is how $e^g$ and $log g$ are elementary).

    To prove that the derivative of an elementary function, you can use induction on the number of these steps. In the induction step, suppose
    the result is true for elementary functions obtained in at most $n$ steps.
    If $f$ can be obtained in $n+1$ steps, the last being $f = f_1 + f_2$ where $f_1$ and $f_2$ each require at most $n$ steps, then $f' = f_1' + f_2'$ where $f_1'$ and $f_2'$ are elementary, and therefore $f'$ is elementary. Similarly for the other possibilities for the last step.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Mar 27 at 18:46

























    answered Mar 27 at 18:16









    Robert IsraelRobert Israel

    330k23219473




    330k23219473











    • $begingroup$
      Okay then how can we prove the derivative of an elementary function is always an elementary function?
      $endgroup$
      – Rithik Kapoor
      Mar 27 at 18:26










    • $begingroup$
      @RithikKapoor Frankly sir, common sense. Writing an explicit formal proof might be tricky but we already know that any composition of elementary functions can be handled with the chain, product, division, and addition rules. If you're asking how to formalize it, fair enough. However if you are asking "How do I know this is true" then it follows by simple observance.
      $endgroup$
      – The Great Duck
      Mar 28 at 0:28










    • $begingroup$
      Query. What if we include the Heaviside step function as an elementary function? Would this have any affect on the answer?
      $endgroup$
      – The Great Duck
      Mar 28 at 0:29










    • $begingroup$
      @TheGreatDuck, before anything else, what would you say about the function $fracx+sqrtx^22x$?
      $endgroup$
      – J. M. is not a mathematician
      Mar 28 at 2:46










    • $begingroup$
      The Heaviside step function is elementary, according to (2), as it satisfies $f^2 - f = 0$.
      $endgroup$
      – Robert Israel
      Mar 28 at 3:01
















    • $begingroup$
      Okay then how can we prove the derivative of an elementary function is always an elementary function?
      $endgroup$
      – Rithik Kapoor
      Mar 27 at 18:26










    • $begingroup$
      @RithikKapoor Frankly sir, common sense. Writing an explicit formal proof might be tricky but we already know that any composition of elementary functions can be handled with the chain, product, division, and addition rules. If you're asking how to formalize it, fair enough. However if you are asking "How do I know this is true" then it follows by simple observance.
      $endgroup$
      – The Great Duck
      Mar 28 at 0:28










    • $begingroup$
      Query. What if we include the Heaviside step function as an elementary function? Would this have any affect on the answer?
      $endgroup$
      – The Great Duck
      Mar 28 at 0:29










    • $begingroup$
      @TheGreatDuck, before anything else, what would you say about the function $fracx+sqrtx^22x$?
      $endgroup$
      – J. M. is not a mathematician
      Mar 28 at 2:46










    • $begingroup$
      The Heaviside step function is elementary, according to (2), as it satisfies $f^2 - f = 0$.
      $endgroup$
      – Robert Israel
      Mar 28 at 3:01















    $begingroup$
    Okay then how can we prove the derivative of an elementary function is always an elementary function?
    $endgroup$
    – Rithik Kapoor
    Mar 27 at 18:26




    $begingroup$
    Okay then how can we prove the derivative of an elementary function is always an elementary function?
    $endgroup$
    – Rithik Kapoor
    Mar 27 at 18:26












    $begingroup$
    @RithikKapoor Frankly sir, common sense. Writing an explicit formal proof might be tricky but we already know that any composition of elementary functions can be handled with the chain, product, division, and addition rules. If you're asking how to formalize it, fair enough. However if you are asking "How do I know this is true" then it follows by simple observance.
    $endgroup$
    – The Great Duck
    Mar 28 at 0:28




    $begingroup$
    @RithikKapoor Frankly sir, common sense. Writing an explicit formal proof might be tricky but we already know that any composition of elementary functions can be handled with the chain, product, division, and addition rules. If you're asking how to formalize it, fair enough. However if you are asking "How do I know this is true" then it follows by simple observance.
    $endgroup$
    – The Great Duck
    Mar 28 at 0:28












    $begingroup$
    Query. What if we include the Heaviside step function as an elementary function? Would this have any affect on the answer?
    $endgroup$
    – The Great Duck
    Mar 28 at 0:29




    $begingroup$
    Query. What if we include the Heaviside step function as an elementary function? Would this have any affect on the answer?
    $endgroup$
    – The Great Duck
    Mar 28 at 0:29












    $begingroup$
    @TheGreatDuck, before anything else, what would you say about the function $fracx+sqrtx^22x$?
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is not a mathematician
    Mar 28 at 2:46




    $begingroup$
    @TheGreatDuck, before anything else, what would you say about the function $fracx+sqrtx^22x$?
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is not a mathematician
    Mar 28 at 2:46












    $begingroup$
    The Heaviside step function is elementary, according to (2), as it satisfies $f^2 - f = 0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Mar 28 at 3:01




    $begingroup$
    The Heaviside step function is elementary, according to (2), as it satisfies $f^2 - f = 0$.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    Mar 28 at 3:01











    1












    $begingroup$

    No, the derivative of an elementary function is elementary; some integrals were defined specifically as the antiderivative of certain functions because that function otherwise would have no closed-form antiderivative.



    An anti-derivative of a non-elementary function cannot be an elementary function.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      1












      $begingroup$

      No, the derivative of an elementary function is elementary; some integrals were defined specifically as the antiderivative of certain functions because that function otherwise would have no closed-form antiderivative.



      An anti-derivative of a non-elementary function cannot be an elementary function.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        No, the derivative of an elementary function is elementary; some integrals were defined specifically as the antiderivative of certain functions because that function otherwise would have no closed-form antiderivative.



        An anti-derivative of a non-elementary function cannot be an elementary function.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        No, the derivative of an elementary function is elementary; some integrals were defined specifically as the antiderivative of certain functions because that function otherwise would have no closed-form antiderivative.



        An anti-derivative of a non-elementary function cannot be an elementary function.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Mar 27 at 18:18









        El EctricEl Ectric

        15411




        15411





















            1












            $begingroup$

            Yes, and I can provide a simple counter-example.



            Let $f(x)$ be piece-wise defined such that $f(x) = x^2$ for $x neq 0$ and such that $f(0) = 300$.



            This is not an elementary function. However its integral is $F(x) = frac 13x^3 + c$ which is elementary.



            For a slightly more "non-elementary" example just make $f(x) = -500$ whenever $x$ is an integer multiple of $n = 0.0001$. Feel free to keep decreasing $n$ to make the function messier and messier.



            However, if you want a continuous non-elementary $f$ then no. If $f$ is continuous then by one of the fundamental theorems of calculus $F'(x) = f(x)$ and the derivative of an elementary function is an elementary function. Furthermore, if you want that $f$ is an integral of some other $h$ then it follows that $f$ is continuous as the integral of any real valued function defined everywhere is a continuous function. So this will only work with discontinuous $f$'s that are not integrals of other functions.



            In short the set of derivatives of elementary functions $neq$ the set of anti-integrals of elementary functions.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Why is a piecewise function with elementary cases not elementary?
              $endgroup$
              – J. M. is not a mathematician
              Mar 28 at 1:20










            • $begingroup$
              @J.M.isnotamathematician an infinite number of cases?
              $endgroup$
              – The Great Duck
              Mar 28 at 1:34






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I am talking about your second sentence. You give a quadratic function with a hole and say that it is nonelementary.
              $endgroup$
              – J. M. is not a mathematician
              Mar 28 at 1:43










            • $begingroup$
              @J.M.isnotamathematician As I said, there are much messier example and I gave one. The definition of elementary is tenuous at best. Provide a detailed analytical definition and I'll say whether something fits inside it. Until then, there's no real way to tell for sure. Elementary has imo always been a subjective concept. Regardless, I can easily keep cranking up the complexity on the counter-example so it doesn't change the result if I mis-identify some simpler function as being non-elementary.
              $endgroup$
              – The Great Duck
              Mar 28 at 1:47






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              "Elementary has imo always been a subjective concept." - in this regard at least, we are in agreement.
              $endgroup$
              – J. M. is not a mathematician
              Mar 28 at 1:55















            1












            $begingroup$

            Yes, and I can provide a simple counter-example.



            Let $f(x)$ be piece-wise defined such that $f(x) = x^2$ for $x neq 0$ and such that $f(0) = 300$.



            This is not an elementary function. However its integral is $F(x) = frac 13x^3 + c$ which is elementary.



            For a slightly more "non-elementary" example just make $f(x) = -500$ whenever $x$ is an integer multiple of $n = 0.0001$. Feel free to keep decreasing $n$ to make the function messier and messier.



            However, if you want a continuous non-elementary $f$ then no. If $f$ is continuous then by one of the fundamental theorems of calculus $F'(x) = f(x)$ and the derivative of an elementary function is an elementary function. Furthermore, if you want that $f$ is an integral of some other $h$ then it follows that $f$ is continuous as the integral of any real valued function defined everywhere is a continuous function. So this will only work with discontinuous $f$'s that are not integrals of other functions.



            In short the set of derivatives of elementary functions $neq$ the set of anti-integrals of elementary functions.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Why is a piecewise function with elementary cases not elementary?
              $endgroup$
              – J. M. is not a mathematician
              Mar 28 at 1:20










            • $begingroup$
              @J.M.isnotamathematician an infinite number of cases?
              $endgroup$
              – The Great Duck
              Mar 28 at 1:34






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I am talking about your second sentence. You give a quadratic function with a hole and say that it is nonelementary.
              $endgroup$
              – J. M. is not a mathematician
              Mar 28 at 1:43










            • $begingroup$
              @J.M.isnotamathematician As I said, there are much messier example and I gave one. The definition of elementary is tenuous at best. Provide a detailed analytical definition and I'll say whether something fits inside it. Until then, there's no real way to tell for sure. Elementary has imo always been a subjective concept. Regardless, I can easily keep cranking up the complexity on the counter-example so it doesn't change the result if I mis-identify some simpler function as being non-elementary.
              $endgroup$
              – The Great Duck
              Mar 28 at 1:47






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              "Elementary has imo always been a subjective concept." - in this regard at least, we are in agreement.
              $endgroup$
              – J. M. is not a mathematician
              Mar 28 at 1:55













            1












            1








            1





            $begingroup$

            Yes, and I can provide a simple counter-example.



            Let $f(x)$ be piece-wise defined such that $f(x) = x^2$ for $x neq 0$ and such that $f(0) = 300$.



            This is not an elementary function. However its integral is $F(x) = frac 13x^3 + c$ which is elementary.



            For a slightly more "non-elementary" example just make $f(x) = -500$ whenever $x$ is an integer multiple of $n = 0.0001$. Feel free to keep decreasing $n$ to make the function messier and messier.



            However, if you want a continuous non-elementary $f$ then no. If $f$ is continuous then by one of the fundamental theorems of calculus $F'(x) = f(x)$ and the derivative of an elementary function is an elementary function. Furthermore, if you want that $f$ is an integral of some other $h$ then it follows that $f$ is continuous as the integral of any real valued function defined everywhere is a continuous function. So this will only work with discontinuous $f$'s that are not integrals of other functions.



            In short the set of derivatives of elementary functions $neq$ the set of anti-integrals of elementary functions.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Yes, and I can provide a simple counter-example.



            Let $f(x)$ be piece-wise defined such that $f(x) = x^2$ for $x neq 0$ and such that $f(0) = 300$.



            This is not an elementary function. However its integral is $F(x) = frac 13x^3 + c$ which is elementary.



            For a slightly more "non-elementary" example just make $f(x) = -500$ whenever $x$ is an integer multiple of $n = 0.0001$. Feel free to keep decreasing $n$ to make the function messier and messier.



            However, if you want a continuous non-elementary $f$ then no. If $f$ is continuous then by one of the fundamental theorems of calculus $F'(x) = f(x)$ and the derivative of an elementary function is an elementary function. Furthermore, if you want that $f$ is an integral of some other $h$ then it follows that $f$ is continuous as the integral of any real valued function defined everywhere is a continuous function. So this will only work with discontinuous $f$'s that are not integrals of other functions.



            In short the set of derivatives of elementary functions $neq$ the set of anti-integrals of elementary functions.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Mar 28 at 0:38









            The Great DuckThe Great Duck

            25732047




            25732047







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Why is a piecewise function with elementary cases not elementary?
              $endgroup$
              – J. M. is not a mathematician
              Mar 28 at 1:20










            • $begingroup$
              @J.M.isnotamathematician an infinite number of cases?
              $endgroup$
              – The Great Duck
              Mar 28 at 1:34






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I am talking about your second sentence. You give a quadratic function with a hole and say that it is nonelementary.
              $endgroup$
              – J. M. is not a mathematician
              Mar 28 at 1:43










            • $begingroup$
              @J.M.isnotamathematician As I said, there are much messier example and I gave one. The definition of elementary is tenuous at best. Provide a detailed analytical definition and I'll say whether something fits inside it. Until then, there's no real way to tell for sure. Elementary has imo always been a subjective concept. Regardless, I can easily keep cranking up the complexity on the counter-example so it doesn't change the result if I mis-identify some simpler function as being non-elementary.
              $endgroup$
              – The Great Duck
              Mar 28 at 1:47






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              "Elementary has imo always been a subjective concept." - in this regard at least, we are in agreement.
              $endgroup$
              – J. M. is not a mathematician
              Mar 28 at 1:55












            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Why is a piecewise function with elementary cases not elementary?
              $endgroup$
              – J. M. is not a mathematician
              Mar 28 at 1:20










            • $begingroup$
              @J.M.isnotamathematician an infinite number of cases?
              $endgroup$
              – The Great Duck
              Mar 28 at 1:34






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I am talking about your second sentence. You give a quadratic function with a hole and say that it is nonelementary.
              $endgroup$
              – J. M. is not a mathematician
              Mar 28 at 1:43










            • $begingroup$
              @J.M.isnotamathematician As I said, there are much messier example and I gave one. The definition of elementary is tenuous at best. Provide a detailed analytical definition and I'll say whether something fits inside it. Until then, there's no real way to tell for sure. Elementary has imo always been a subjective concept. Regardless, I can easily keep cranking up the complexity on the counter-example so it doesn't change the result if I mis-identify some simpler function as being non-elementary.
              $endgroup$
              – The Great Duck
              Mar 28 at 1:47






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              "Elementary has imo always been a subjective concept." - in this regard at least, we are in agreement.
              $endgroup$
              – J. M. is not a mathematician
              Mar 28 at 1:55







            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            Why is a piecewise function with elementary cases not elementary?
            $endgroup$
            – J. M. is not a mathematician
            Mar 28 at 1:20




            $begingroup$
            Why is a piecewise function with elementary cases not elementary?
            $endgroup$
            – J. M. is not a mathematician
            Mar 28 at 1:20












            $begingroup$
            @J.M.isnotamathematician an infinite number of cases?
            $endgroup$
            – The Great Duck
            Mar 28 at 1:34




            $begingroup$
            @J.M.isnotamathematician an infinite number of cases?
            $endgroup$
            – The Great Duck
            Mar 28 at 1:34




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            I am talking about your second sentence. You give a quadratic function with a hole and say that it is nonelementary.
            $endgroup$
            – J. M. is not a mathematician
            Mar 28 at 1:43




            $begingroup$
            I am talking about your second sentence. You give a quadratic function with a hole and say that it is nonelementary.
            $endgroup$
            – J. M. is not a mathematician
            Mar 28 at 1:43












            $begingroup$
            @J.M.isnotamathematician As I said, there are much messier example and I gave one. The definition of elementary is tenuous at best. Provide a detailed analytical definition and I'll say whether something fits inside it. Until then, there's no real way to tell for sure. Elementary has imo always been a subjective concept. Regardless, I can easily keep cranking up the complexity on the counter-example so it doesn't change the result if I mis-identify some simpler function as being non-elementary.
            $endgroup$
            – The Great Duck
            Mar 28 at 1:47




            $begingroup$
            @J.M.isnotamathematician As I said, there are much messier example and I gave one. The definition of elementary is tenuous at best. Provide a detailed analytical definition and I'll say whether something fits inside it. Until then, there's no real way to tell for sure. Elementary has imo always been a subjective concept. Regardless, I can easily keep cranking up the complexity on the counter-example so it doesn't change the result if I mis-identify some simpler function as being non-elementary.
            $endgroup$
            – The Great Duck
            Mar 28 at 1:47




            2




            2




            $begingroup$
            "Elementary has imo always been a subjective concept." - in this regard at least, we are in agreement.
            $endgroup$
            – J. M. is not a mathematician
            Mar 28 at 1:55




            $begingroup$
            "Elementary has imo always been a subjective concept." - in this regard at least, we are in agreement.
            $endgroup$
            – J. M. is not a mathematician
            Mar 28 at 1:55

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3164890%2fhow-can-we-prove-that-any-integral-in-the-set-of-non-elementary-integrals-cannot%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Adding axes to figuresAdding axes labels to LaTeX figuresLaTeX equivalent of ConTeXt buffersRotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?adding axes to shapesAlign axes across subfiguresAdding figures with a certain orderLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themAdding axes labels to LaTeX figures

            Tähtien Talli Jäsenet | Lähteet | NavigointivalikkoSuomen Hippos – Tähtien Talli

            Do these cracks on my tires look bad? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowDry rot tire should I replace?Having to replace tiresFishtailed so easily? Bad tires? ABS?Filling the tires with something other than air, to avoid puncture hassles?Used Michelin tires safe to install?Do these tyre cracks necessitate replacement?Rumbling noise: tires or mechanicalIs it possible to fix noisy feathered tires?Are bad winter tires still better than summer tires in winter?Torque converter failure - Related to replacing only 2 tires?Why use snow tires on all 4 wheels on 2-wheel-drive cars?