How does the bounding box regressor work in Fast R-CNN? Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara 2019 Moderator Election Q&A - Questionnaire 2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsAre there pretrained models on the ImageNet Bounding Boxes dataset?Faster R-CNN: Labels regarding the positive anchors when there are many classesHow does region proposal network (RPN) and R-CNN works?How does YOLO algorithm detect objects if the grid size is way smaller than the object in the test image?Faster R-CNN wrapper for the number of RPNs in the layer dimensions?What does the co-ordinate output in the yolo algorithm represent?What is difference between intersection over union (IoU) and intersection over bounding box (IoBB)?Bounding Boxes in YOLO ModelHow to project a bounding box on feature map?Bounding box regression in R-CNN

Air bladders in bat-like skin wings for better lift?

How much of a wave function must reside inside event horizon for it to be consumed by the black hole?

Crossed out red box fitting tightly around image

Tikz positioning above circle exact alignment

Map material from china not allowed to leave the country

Why must Chinese maps be obfuscated?

The weakest link

Is Diceware more secure than a long passphrase?

Why do distances seem to matter in the Foundation world?

Island of Knights, Knaves and Spies

How much cash can I safely carry into the USA and avoid civil forfeiture?

Is there really no use for MD5 anymore?

Does Mathematica have an implementation of the Poisson binomial distribution?

Multiple options vs single option UI

Why does Arg'[1. + I] return -0.5?

Why didn't the Space Shuttle bounce back into space as many times as possible so as to lose a lot of kinetic energy up there?

A faster way to compute the largest prime factor

Scheduling based problem

"Whatever a Russian does, they end up making the Kalashnikov gun"? Are there any similar proverbs in English?

Mistake in years of experience in resume?

All ASCII characters with a given bit count

Will I lose my paid in full property

How can I practically buy stocks?

Intern got a job offer for same salary than a long term team member



How does the bounding box regressor work in Fast R-CNN?



Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
2019 Moderator Election Q&A - Questionnaire
2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsAre there pretrained models on the ImageNet Bounding Boxes dataset?Faster R-CNN: Labels regarding the positive anchors when there are many classesHow does region proposal network (RPN) and R-CNN works?How does YOLO algorithm detect objects if the grid size is way smaller than the object in the test image?Faster R-CNN wrapper for the number of RPNs in the layer dimensions?What does the co-ordinate output in the yolo algorithm represent?What is difference between intersection over union (IoU) and intersection over bounding box (IoBB)?Bounding Boxes in YOLO ModelHow to project a bounding box on feature map?Bounding box regression in R-CNN










5












$begingroup$


In the fast R-CNN paper (https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.08083) by Ross Girshick, the bounding box parameters are continuous variables. These values are predicted using regression method. Unlike other neural network outputs, these values do not represent the probability of output classes. Rather, they are physical values representing position and size of a bounding box.



The exact method of how this regression learning happens is not clear to me. Linear regression and image classification by deep learning are well explained separately earlier. But how the linear regression algorithm works in the CNN settings is not explained so clearly.



Can you explain the basic concept for easy understanding?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    5












    $begingroup$


    In the fast R-CNN paper (https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.08083) by Ross Girshick, the bounding box parameters are continuous variables. These values are predicted using regression method. Unlike other neural network outputs, these values do not represent the probability of output classes. Rather, they are physical values representing position and size of a bounding box.



    The exact method of how this regression learning happens is not clear to me. Linear regression and image classification by deep learning are well explained separately earlier. But how the linear regression algorithm works in the CNN settings is not explained so clearly.



    Can you explain the basic concept for easy understanding?










    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      5












      5








      5


      2



      $begingroup$


      In the fast R-CNN paper (https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.08083) by Ross Girshick, the bounding box parameters are continuous variables. These values are predicted using regression method. Unlike other neural network outputs, these values do not represent the probability of output classes. Rather, they are physical values representing position and size of a bounding box.



      The exact method of how this regression learning happens is not clear to me. Linear regression and image classification by deep learning are well explained separately earlier. But how the linear regression algorithm works in the CNN settings is not explained so clearly.



      Can you explain the basic concept for easy understanding?










      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      In the fast R-CNN paper (https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.08083) by Ross Girshick, the bounding box parameters are continuous variables. These values are predicted using regression method. Unlike other neural network outputs, these values do not represent the probability of output classes. Rather, they are physical values representing position and size of a bounding box.



      The exact method of how this regression learning happens is not clear to me. Linear regression and image classification by deep learning are well explained separately earlier. But how the linear regression algorithm works in the CNN settings is not explained so clearly.



      Can you explain the basic concept for easy understanding?







      image-recognition object-recognition yolo faster-rcnn






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Apr 20 '18 at 7:25









      Saptarshi RoySaptarshi Roy

      13718




      13718




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          The paper cited does not mention linear regression at all. What it does is using a neural network to predict continuous variables, and refers to that as regression.



          The regression that is defined (which is not linear at all), is just a CNN with convolutional layers, and fully connected layers, but in the last fully connected layer, it does not apply sigmoid or softmax, which is what is typically used in classification, as the values correspond to probabilities. Instead, what this CNN outputs are four values $(r, c, h, w)$, where $(r, c)$ specify the values of the position of the left corner and $(h, w)$ the height and width of the window. In order to train this NN, the loss function will penalize when the outputs of the NN are very different from the labelled $(r, c, h, w)$ in the training set.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Yes. It was my mistake to mention the regressor as linear.
            $endgroup$
            – Saptarshi Roy
            Apr 20 '18 at 8:12










          • $begingroup$
            Did I answer your question though?
            $endgroup$
            – David Masip
            Apr 20 '18 at 8:42










          • $begingroup$
            After your comment (and few subsequent google search), I have understood that NN can very well solve regression problems by replacing the last layer. But the intuitive understanding of how the exact value of lengths coming is still not there. For example, the layers of CNN indicate different features of an image (features like edges, color etc.). The training method finds the correct filters (weights) to extract only the relevant features to discriminate the positive examples from the negative ones. I was looking for a similar explanation for the regression part.
            $endgroup$
            – Saptarshi Roy
            Apr 20 '18 at 8:49







          • 2




            $begingroup$
            In the regression setting, the training method finds the correct filters (weights) to extract the relevant features to find the position of the top left edge, as well as the height and the width. In the end, what you have is a cost function that measures how good you are doing on predicting these features. And that is what deep learning is all about: give me a differentiable cost function, some labelled images and I'll find you a way to predict the labels. Is this more clear?
            $endgroup$
            – David Masip
            Apr 20 '18 at 8:58










          • $begingroup$
            It is somewhat clearer than before.
            $endgroup$
            – Saptarshi Roy
            Apr 20 '18 at 9:27



















          0












          $begingroup$


          A very clear and in-depth explanation is provided by the slow R-CNN paper by Author(Girshick et. al) on page 12: C. Bounding-box regression and I simply paste here for quick reading:




          enter image description hereenter image description here




          Moreover, the author took inspiration from an earlier paper and talked about the difference in the two techniques is below:




          enter image description here




          After which in Fast-RCNN paper which you referenced to, the author changed the loss function for BB regression task from regularized least squares(ridge regression) to smooth L1 which is less sensitive to outliers!. Also, you embed this smooth L1 loss in the multi-task loss function so that we can jointly train for classification and bounding-box regression that wasn't done before in R-CNN or SPP-net!




          enter image description here




          However, the same author has changed the loss function again in the upcoming paper faster-RCNN
          Later, in FCN
          Many a time, in order to learn about a topic, you need to do backtracking through research papers! :) Hope it helps!







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "557"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f30557%2fhow-does-the-bounding-box-regressor-work-in-fast-r-cnn%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3












            $begingroup$

            The paper cited does not mention linear regression at all. What it does is using a neural network to predict continuous variables, and refers to that as regression.



            The regression that is defined (which is not linear at all), is just a CNN with convolutional layers, and fully connected layers, but in the last fully connected layer, it does not apply sigmoid or softmax, which is what is typically used in classification, as the values correspond to probabilities. Instead, what this CNN outputs are four values $(r, c, h, w)$, where $(r, c)$ specify the values of the position of the left corner and $(h, w)$ the height and width of the window. In order to train this NN, the loss function will penalize when the outputs of the NN are very different from the labelled $(r, c, h, w)$ in the training set.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Yes. It was my mistake to mention the regressor as linear.
              $endgroup$
              – Saptarshi Roy
              Apr 20 '18 at 8:12










            • $begingroup$
              Did I answer your question though?
              $endgroup$
              – David Masip
              Apr 20 '18 at 8:42










            • $begingroup$
              After your comment (and few subsequent google search), I have understood that NN can very well solve regression problems by replacing the last layer. But the intuitive understanding of how the exact value of lengths coming is still not there. For example, the layers of CNN indicate different features of an image (features like edges, color etc.). The training method finds the correct filters (weights) to extract only the relevant features to discriminate the positive examples from the negative ones. I was looking for a similar explanation for the regression part.
              $endgroup$
              – Saptarshi Roy
              Apr 20 '18 at 8:49







            • 2




              $begingroup$
              In the regression setting, the training method finds the correct filters (weights) to extract the relevant features to find the position of the top left edge, as well as the height and the width. In the end, what you have is a cost function that measures how good you are doing on predicting these features. And that is what deep learning is all about: give me a differentiable cost function, some labelled images and I'll find you a way to predict the labels. Is this more clear?
              $endgroup$
              – David Masip
              Apr 20 '18 at 8:58










            • $begingroup$
              It is somewhat clearer than before.
              $endgroup$
              – Saptarshi Roy
              Apr 20 '18 at 9:27
















            3












            $begingroup$

            The paper cited does not mention linear regression at all. What it does is using a neural network to predict continuous variables, and refers to that as regression.



            The regression that is defined (which is not linear at all), is just a CNN with convolutional layers, and fully connected layers, but in the last fully connected layer, it does not apply sigmoid or softmax, which is what is typically used in classification, as the values correspond to probabilities. Instead, what this CNN outputs are four values $(r, c, h, w)$, where $(r, c)$ specify the values of the position of the left corner and $(h, w)$ the height and width of the window. In order to train this NN, the loss function will penalize when the outputs of the NN are very different from the labelled $(r, c, h, w)$ in the training set.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Yes. It was my mistake to mention the regressor as linear.
              $endgroup$
              – Saptarshi Roy
              Apr 20 '18 at 8:12










            • $begingroup$
              Did I answer your question though?
              $endgroup$
              – David Masip
              Apr 20 '18 at 8:42










            • $begingroup$
              After your comment (and few subsequent google search), I have understood that NN can very well solve regression problems by replacing the last layer. But the intuitive understanding of how the exact value of lengths coming is still not there. For example, the layers of CNN indicate different features of an image (features like edges, color etc.). The training method finds the correct filters (weights) to extract only the relevant features to discriminate the positive examples from the negative ones. I was looking for a similar explanation for the regression part.
              $endgroup$
              – Saptarshi Roy
              Apr 20 '18 at 8:49







            • 2




              $begingroup$
              In the regression setting, the training method finds the correct filters (weights) to extract the relevant features to find the position of the top left edge, as well as the height and the width. In the end, what you have is a cost function that measures how good you are doing on predicting these features. And that is what deep learning is all about: give me a differentiable cost function, some labelled images and I'll find you a way to predict the labels. Is this more clear?
              $endgroup$
              – David Masip
              Apr 20 '18 at 8:58










            • $begingroup$
              It is somewhat clearer than before.
              $endgroup$
              – Saptarshi Roy
              Apr 20 '18 at 9:27














            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            The paper cited does not mention linear regression at all. What it does is using a neural network to predict continuous variables, and refers to that as regression.



            The regression that is defined (which is not linear at all), is just a CNN with convolutional layers, and fully connected layers, but in the last fully connected layer, it does not apply sigmoid or softmax, which is what is typically used in classification, as the values correspond to probabilities. Instead, what this CNN outputs are four values $(r, c, h, w)$, where $(r, c)$ specify the values of the position of the left corner and $(h, w)$ the height and width of the window. In order to train this NN, the loss function will penalize when the outputs of the NN are very different from the labelled $(r, c, h, w)$ in the training set.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            The paper cited does not mention linear regression at all. What it does is using a neural network to predict continuous variables, and refers to that as regression.



            The regression that is defined (which is not linear at all), is just a CNN with convolutional layers, and fully connected layers, but in the last fully connected layer, it does not apply sigmoid or softmax, which is what is typically used in classification, as the values correspond to probabilities. Instead, what this CNN outputs are four values $(r, c, h, w)$, where $(r, c)$ specify the values of the position of the left corner and $(h, w)$ the height and width of the window. In order to train this NN, the loss function will penalize when the outputs of the NN are very different from the labelled $(r, c, h, w)$ in the training set.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Apr 20 '18 at 7:58









            David MasipDavid Masip

            2,6561629




            2,6561629











            • $begingroup$
              Yes. It was my mistake to mention the regressor as linear.
              $endgroup$
              – Saptarshi Roy
              Apr 20 '18 at 8:12










            • $begingroup$
              Did I answer your question though?
              $endgroup$
              – David Masip
              Apr 20 '18 at 8:42










            • $begingroup$
              After your comment (and few subsequent google search), I have understood that NN can very well solve regression problems by replacing the last layer. But the intuitive understanding of how the exact value of lengths coming is still not there. For example, the layers of CNN indicate different features of an image (features like edges, color etc.). The training method finds the correct filters (weights) to extract only the relevant features to discriminate the positive examples from the negative ones. I was looking for a similar explanation for the regression part.
              $endgroup$
              – Saptarshi Roy
              Apr 20 '18 at 8:49







            • 2




              $begingroup$
              In the regression setting, the training method finds the correct filters (weights) to extract the relevant features to find the position of the top left edge, as well as the height and the width. In the end, what you have is a cost function that measures how good you are doing on predicting these features. And that is what deep learning is all about: give me a differentiable cost function, some labelled images and I'll find you a way to predict the labels. Is this more clear?
              $endgroup$
              – David Masip
              Apr 20 '18 at 8:58










            • $begingroup$
              It is somewhat clearer than before.
              $endgroup$
              – Saptarshi Roy
              Apr 20 '18 at 9:27

















            • $begingroup$
              Yes. It was my mistake to mention the regressor as linear.
              $endgroup$
              – Saptarshi Roy
              Apr 20 '18 at 8:12










            • $begingroup$
              Did I answer your question though?
              $endgroup$
              – David Masip
              Apr 20 '18 at 8:42










            • $begingroup$
              After your comment (and few subsequent google search), I have understood that NN can very well solve regression problems by replacing the last layer. But the intuitive understanding of how the exact value of lengths coming is still not there. For example, the layers of CNN indicate different features of an image (features like edges, color etc.). The training method finds the correct filters (weights) to extract only the relevant features to discriminate the positive examples from the negative ones. I was looking for a similar explanation for the regression part.
              $endgroup$
              – Saptarshi Roy
              Apr 20 '18 at 8:49







            • 2




              $begingroup$
              In the regression setting, the training method finds the correct filters (weights) to extract the relevant features to find the position of the top left edge, as well as the height and the width. In the end, what you have is a cost function that measures how good you are doing on predicting these features. And that is what deep learning is all about: give me a differentiable cost function, some labelled images and I'll find you a way to predict the labels. Is this more clear?
              $endgroup$
              – David Masip
              Apr 20 '18 at 8:58










            • $begingroup$
              It is somewhat clearer than before.
              $endgroup$
              – Saptarshi Roy
              Apr 20 '18 at 9:27
















            $begingroup$
            Yes. It was my mistake to mention the regressor as linear.
            $endgroup$
            – Saptarshi Roy
            Apr 20 '18 at 8:12




            $begingroup$
            Yes. It was my mistake to mention the regressor as linear.
            $endgroup$
            – Saptarshi Roy
            Apr 20 '18 at 8:12












            $begingroup$
            Did I answer your question though?
            $endgroup$
            – David Masip
            Apr 20 '18 at 8:42




            $begingroup$
            Did I answer your question though?
            $endgroup$
            – David Masip
            Apr 20 '18 at 8:42












            $begingroup$
            After your comment (and few subsequent google search), I have understood that NN can very well solve regression problems by replacing the last layer. But the intuitive understanding of how the exact value of lengths coming is still not there. For example, the layers of CNN indicate different features of an image (features like edges, color etc.). The training method finds the correct filters (weights) to extract only the relevant features to discriminate the positive examples from the negative ones. I was looking for a similar explanation for the regression part.
            $endgroup$
            – Saptarshi Roy
            Apr 20 '18 at 8:49





            $begingroup$
            After your comment (and few subsequent google search), I have understood that NN can very well solve regression problems by replacing the last layer. But the intuitive understanding of how the exact value of lengths coming is still not there. For example, the layers of CNN indicate different features of an image (features like edges, color etc.). The training method finds the correct filters (weights) to extract only the relevant features to discriminate the positive examples from the negative ones. I was looking for a similar explanation for the regression part.
            $endgroup$
            – Saptarshi Roy
            Apr 20 '18 at 8:49





            2




            2




            $begingroup$
            In the regression setting, the training method finds the correct filters (weights) to extract the relevant features to find the position of the top left edge, as well as the height and the width. In the end, what you have is a cost function that measures how good you are doing on predicting these features. And that is what deep learning is all about: give me a differentiable cost function, some labelled images and I'll find you a way to predict the labels. Is this more clear?
            $endgroup$
            – David Masip
            Apr 20 '18 at 8:58




            $begingroup$
            In the regression setting, the training method finds the correct filters (weights) to extract the relevant features to find the position of the top left edge, as well as the height and the width. In the end, what you have is a cost function that measures how good you are doing on predicting these features. And that is what deep learning is all about: give me a differentiable cost function, some labelled images and I'll find you a way to predict the labels. Is this more clear?
            $endgroup$
            – David Masip
            Apr 20 '18 at 8:58












            $begingroup$
            It is somewhat clearer than before.
            $endgroup$
            – Saptarshi Roy
            Apr 20 '18 at 9:27





            $begingroup$
            It is somewhat clearer than before.
            $endgroup$
            – Saptarshi Roy
            Apr 20 '18 at 9:27












            0












            $begingroup$


            A very clear and in-depth explanation is provided by the slow R-CNN paper by Author(Girshick et. al) on page 12: C. Bounding-box regression and I simply paste here for quick reading:




            enter image description hereenter image description here




            Moreover, the author took inspiration from an earlier paper and talked about the difference in the two techniques is below:




            enter image description here




            After which in Fast-RCNN paper which you referenced to, the author changed the loss function for BB regression task from regularized least squares(ridge regression) to smooth L1 which is less sensitive to outliers!. Also, you embed this smooth L1 loss in the multi-task loss function so that we can jointly train for classification and bounding-box regression that wasn't done before in R-CNN or SPP-net!




            enter image description here




            However, the same author has changed the loss function again in the upcoming paper faster-RCNN
            Later, in FCN
            Many a time, in order to learn about a topic, you need to do backtracking through research papers! :) Hope it helps!







            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              0












              $begingroup$


              A very clear and in-depth explanation is provided by the slow R-CNN paper by Author(Girshick et. al) on page 12: C. Bounding-box regression and I simply paste here for quick reading:




              enter image description hereenter image description here




              Moreover, the author took inspiration from an earlier paper and talked about the difference in the two techniques is below:




              enter image description here




              After which in Fast-RCNN paper which you referenced to, the author changed the loss function for BB regression task from regularized least squares(ridge regression) to smooth L1 which is less sensitive to outliers!. Also, you embed this smooth L1 loss in the multi-task loss function so that we can jointly train for classification and bounding-box regression that wasn't done before in R-CNN or SPP-net!




              enter image description here




              However, the same author has changed the loss function again in the upcoming paper faster-RCNN
              Later, in FCN
              Many a time, in order to learn about a topic, you need to do backtracking through research papers! :) Hope it helps!







              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$


                A very clear and in-depth explanation is provided by the slow R-CNN paper by Author(Girshick et. al) on page 12: C. Bounding-box regression and I simply paste here for quick reading:




                enter image description hereenter image description here




                Moreover, the author took inspiration from an earlier paper and talked about the difference in the two techniques is below:




                enter image description here




                After which in Fast-RCNN paper which you referenced to, the author changed the loss function for BB regression task from regularized least squares(ridge regression) to smooth L1 which is less sensitive to outliers!. Also, you embed this smooth L1 loss in the multi-task loss function so that we can jointly train for classification and bounding-box regression that wasn't done before in R-CNN or SPP-net!




                enter image description here




                However, the same author has changed the loss function again in the upcoming paper faster-RCNN
                Later, in FCN
                Many a time, in order to learn about a topic, you need to do backtracking through research papers! :) Hope it helps!







                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$




                A very clear and in-depth explanation is provided by the slow R-CNN paper by Author(Girshick et. al) on page 12: C. Bounding-box regression and I simply paste here for quick reading:




                enter image description hereenter image description here




                Moreover, the author took inspiration from an earlier paper and talked about the difference in the two techniques is below:




                enter image description here




                After which in Fast-RCNN paper which you referenced to, the author changed the loss function for BB regression task from regularized least squares(ridge regression) to smooth L1 which is less sensitive to outliers!. Also, you embed this smooth L1 loss in the multi-task loss function so that we can jointly train for classification and bounding-box regression that wasn't done before in R-CNN or SPP-net!




                enter image description here




                However, the same author has changed the loss function again in the upcoming paper faster-RCNN
                Later, in FCN
                Many a time, in order to learn about a topic, you need to do backtracking through research papers! :) Hope it helps!








                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Apr 6 at 18:41









                anuanu

                1689




                1689



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f30557%2fhow-does-the-bounding-box-regressor-work-in-fast-r-cnn%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Adding axes to figuresAdding axes labels to LaTeX figuresLaTeX equivalent of ConTeXt buffersRotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?adding axes to shapesAlign axes across subfiguresAdding figures with a certain orderLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themAdding axes labels to LaTeX figures

                    Luettelo Yhdysvaltain laivaston lentotukialuksista Lähteet | Navigointivalikko

                    Gary (muusikko) Sisällysluettelo Historia | Rockin' High | Lähteet | Aiheesta muualla | NavigointivalikkoInfobox OKTuomas "Gary" Keskinen Ancaran kitaristiksiProjekti Rockin' High