Is it a red flag that increasing the number of parameters makes the model less able to overfit small amounts of data? Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara 2019 Moderator Election Q&A - Questionnaire 2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsHow to set the number of neurons and layers in neural networksUnderstanding Tensorflow LSTM models?Neural net learning only one class?Implementing the Dependency Sensitive CNN (DSCNN ) in Kerasmultiple digit detectionHow to improve loss and avoid overfittingRegularization - Combine drop out with early stoppingNER at sentence level or document level?Using RNN (LSTM) for Gesture Recognition SystemComputer Vision: Handling dataset(3D data or scan) with different timestepsDoes it make sense to train a convolutional neural network on lo-res, use on hi-res pictures?

Reattaching fallen shelf to wall?

Air bladders in bat-like skin wings for better lift?

Why does Arg'[1. + I] return -0.5?

First instead of 1 when referencing

Unable to completely uninstall Zoom meeting app

Suing a Police Officer Instead of the Police Department

Could moose/elk survive in the Amazon forest?

Israeli soda type drink

Is Diceware more secure than a long passphrase?

Is accepting an invalid credit card number a security issue?

Why do games have consumables?

Is it possible to cast 2x Final Payment while sacrificing just one creature?

Was Dennis Ritchie being too modest in this quote about C and Pascal?

How to translate "red flag" into Spanish?

Long vowel quality before R

std::unique_ptr of base class holding reference of derived class does not show warning in gcc compiler while naked pointer shows it. Why?

Implementing 3DES algorithm in Java: is my code secure?

How to not starve gigantic beasts

Raising a bilingual kid. When should we introduce the majority language?

Older movie/show about humans on derelict alien warship which refuels by passing through a star

How much of a wave function must reside inside event horizon for it to be consumed by the black hole?

Retract an already submitted recommendation letter (written for an undergrad student)

Arriving in Atlanta after US Preclearance in Dublin. Will I go through TSA security in Atlanta to transfer to a connecting flight?

Did the Roman Empire have penal colonies?



Is it a red flag that increasing the number of parameters makes the model less able to overfit small amounts of data?



Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
2019 Moderator Election Q&A - Questionnaire
2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsHow to set the number of neurons and layers in neural networksUnderstanding Tensorflow LSTM models?Neural net learning only one class?Implementing the Dependency Sensitive CNN (DSCNN ) in Kerasmultiple digit detectionHow to improve loss and avoid overfittingRegularization - Combine drop out with early stoppingNER at sentence level or document level?Using RNN (LSTM) for Gesture Recognition SystemComputer Vision: Handling dataset(3D data or scan) with different timestepsDoes it make sense to train a convolutional neural network on lo-res, use on hi-res pictures?










3












$begingroup$


I'm training a deep network (CNN-LSTM-CRF) for Named Entity Recognition. Is there a reason that increasing the number of parameters would make the network less able to overfit a small training set (~20 sentences), or does this indicate a serious bug in the code?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    No, it means you have to train it more.
    $endgroup$
    – Vaalizaadeh
    Jul 9 '18 at 1:36






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "less able to overfit" -- explain how it is that you are measuring this, and we can help more.
    $endgroup$
    – Scott
    Jul 9 '18 at 4:11















3












$begingroup$


I'm training a deep network (CNN-LSTM-CRF) for Named Entity Recognition. Is there a reason that increasing the number of parameters would make the network less able to overfit a small training set (~20 sentences), or does this indicate a serious bug in the code?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    No, it means you have to train it more.
    $endgroup$
    – Vaalizaadeh
    Jul 9 '18 at 1:36






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "less able to overfit" -- explain how it is that you are measuring this, and we can help more.
    $endgroup$
    – Scott
    Jul 9 '18 at 4:11













3












3








3





$begingroup$


I'm training a deep network (CNN-LSTM-CRF) for Named Entity Recognition. Is there a reason that increasing the number of parameters would make the network less able to overfit a small training set (~20 sentences), or does this indicate a serious bug in the code?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




I'm training a deep network (CNN-LSTM-CRF) for Named Entity Recognition. Is there a reason that increasing the number of parameters would make the network less able to overfit a small training set (~20 sentences), or does this indicate a serious bug in the code?







deep-learning nlp lstm cnn named-entity-recognition






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Jul 9 '18 at 1:24









SolveItSolveIt

1162




1162







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    No, it means you have to train it more.
    $endgroup$
    – Vaalizaadeh
    Jul 9 '18 at 1:36






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "less able to overfit" -- explain how it is that you are measuring this, and we can help more.
    $endgroup$
    – Scott
    Jul 9 '18 at 4:11












  • 3




    $begingroup$
    No, it means you have to train it more.
    $endgroup$
    – Vaalizaadeh
    Jul 9 '18 at 1:36






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "less able to overfit" -- explain how it is that you are measuring this, and we can help more.
    $endgroup$
    – Scott
    Jul 9 '18 at 4:11







3




3




$begingroup$
No, it means you have to train it more.
$endgroup$
– Vaalizaadeh
Jul 9 '18 at 1:36




$begingroup$
No, it means you have to train it more.
$endgroup$
– Vaalizaadeh
Jul 9 '18 at 1:36




1




1




$begingroup$
"less able to overfit" -- explain how it is that you are measuring this, and we can help more.
$endgroup$
– Scott
Jul 9 '18 at 4:11




$begingroup$
"less able to overfit" -- explain how it is that you are measuring this, and we can help more.
$endgroup$
– Scott
Jul 9 '18 at 4:11










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

It is not necessarily a red flag. Of course, without seeing the code, it is impossible to say that for sure.



What is likely happening here is that adding parameters to your model, it makes it harder for it to converge to some minimum. More parameters roughly mean that your model is able to explain "more complex stuff". And since you have a small amount of data, the explanation should remain rather simple. Therefore, your model is trying to explain something simple in a complicated way, and it might not be easy to do so.



Also, are you using dropout or regularization? If yes, this might also be an issue as these are explicitly use to avoid overfitting.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "557"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f34174%2fis-it-a-red-flag-that-increasing-the-number-of-parameters-makes-the-model-less-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    It is not necessarily a red flag. Of course, without seeing the code, it is impossible to say that for sure.



    What is likely happening here is that adding parameters to your model, it makes it harder for it to converge to some minimum. More parameters roughly mean that your model is able to explain "more complex stuff". And since you have a small amount of data, the explanation should remain rather simple. Therefore, your model is trying to explain something simple in a complicated way, and it might not be easy to do so.



    Also, are you using dropout or regularization? If yes, this might also be an issue as these are explicitly use to avoid overfitting.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      0












      $begingroup$

      It is not necessarily a red flag. Of course, without seeing the code, it is impossible to say that for sure.



      What is likely happening here is that adding parameters to your model, it makes it harder for it to converge to some minimum. More parameters roughly mean that your model is able to explain "more complex stuff". And since you have a small amount of data, the explanation should remain rather simple. Therefore, your model is trying to explain something simple in a complicated way, and it might not be easy to do so.



      Also, are you using dropout or regularization? If yes, this might also be an issue as these are explicitly use to avoid overfitting.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        It is not necessarily a red flag. Of course, without seeing the code, it is impossible to say that for sure.



        What is likely happening here is that adding parameters to your model, it makes it harder for it to converge to some minimum. More parameters roughly mean that your model is able to explain "more complex stuff". And since you have a small amount of data, the explanation should remain rather simple. Therefore, your model is trying to explain something simple in a complicated way, and it might not be easy to do so.



        Also, are you using dropout or regularization? If yes, this might also be an issue as these are explicitly use to avoid overfitting.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        It is not necessarily a red flag. Of course, without seeing the code, it is impossible to say that for sure.



        What is likely happening here is that adding parameters to your model, it makes it harder for it to converge to some minimum. More parameters roughly mean that your model is able to explain "more complex stuff". And since you have a small amount of data, the explanation should remain rather simple. Therefore, your model is trying to explain something simple in a complicated way, and it might not be easy to do so.



        Also, are you using dropout or regularization? If yes, this might also be an issue as these are explicitly use to avoid overfitting.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Jul 10 '18 at 12:52









        Valentin CalommeValentin Calomme

        1,365523




        1,365523



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f34174%2fis-it-a-red-flag-that-increasing-the-number-of-parameters-makes-the-model-less-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Adding axes to figuresAdding axes labels to LaTeX figuresLaTeX equivalent of ConTeXt buffersRotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?adding axes to shapesAlign axes across subfiguresAdding figures with a certain orderLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themAdding axes labels to LaTeX figures

            Luettelo Yhdysvaltain laivaston lentotukialuksista Lähteet | Navigointivalikko

            Gary (muusikko) Sisällysluettelo Historia | Rockin' High | Lähteet | Aiheesta muualla | NavigointivalikkoInfobox OKTuomas "Gary" Keskinen Ancaran kitaristiksiProjekti Rockin' High