C++ check if statement can be evaluated constexprWhat are the differences between a pointer variable and a reference variable in C++?How can I profile C++ code running on Linux?The Definitive C++ Book Guide and ListWhy can templates only be implemented in the header file?What is the effect of extern “C” in C++?What is the “-->” operator in C++?Easiest way to convert int to string in C++C++11 introduced a standardized memory model. What does it mean? And how is it going to affect C++ programming?Why is reading lines from stdin much slower in C++ than Python?Difference between `constexpr` and `const`

Simulating a probability of 1 of 2^N with less than N random bits

Is it okay / does it make sense for another player to join a running game of Munchkin?

What linear sensor for a keyboard?

QGIS Geometry Generator Line Type

What should I use for Mishna study?

Suggestion on Missing Index Creation

Adding empty element to declared container without declaring type of element

Freedom of speech and where it applies

The most efficient algorithm to find all possible integer pairs which sum to a given integer

How to deal with loss of decision making power over a change?

Is there a problem with hiding "forgot password" until it's needed?

What does the "3am" section means in manpages?

I2C signal and power over long range (10meter cable)

Teaching indefinite integrals

Can I Retrieve Email Addresses from BCC?

Hostile work environment after whistle-blowing on coworker and our boss. What do I do?

How to decode Core DB Account.Signers using the stellar js-sdk

Have I saved too much for retirement so far?

How did Monica know how to operate Carol's "designer"?

Do these cracks on my tires look bad?

In Star Trek IV, why did the Bounty go back to a time when whales were already rare?

Is it possible to build a CPA Secure encryption scheme which remains secure even when the encryption of secret key is given?

Partial sums of primes

Reply ‘no position’ while the job posting is still there (‘HiWi’ position in Germany)



C++ check if statement can be evaluated constexpr


What are the differences between a pointer variable and a reference variable in C++?How can I profile C++ code running on Linux?The Definitive C++ Book Guide and ListWhy can templates only be implemented in the header file?What is the effect of extern “C” in C++?What is the “-->” operator in C++?Easiest way to convert int to string in C++C++11 introduced a standardized memory model. What does it mean? And how is it going to affect C++ programming?Why is reading lines from stdin much slower in C++ than Python?Difference between `constexpr` and `const`













13















Is there a method to decide whether something can be constexpr evaluated, and use the result as a constexpr boolean? My simplified use case is as follows:



template <typename base>
class derived

template<size_t size>
void do_stuff() (...)

void do_stuff(size_t size) (...)
public:
void execute()

if constexpr(is_constexpr(base::get_data())

do_stuff<base::get_data()>();

else

do_stuff(base::get_data());





My target is C++2a.



I found the following reddit thread, but I'm not a big fan of the macros. https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/7c208c/is_constexpr_a_macro_that_check_if_an_expression/










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    Hmm, the body of a if constexpr will only be evaluated if the expression in the if constexpr is true at compile time. Is that what you are looking for?

    – Jesper Juhl
    Mar 21 at 20:13






  • 1





    But what if the test in the if constexpr([test]) is not evaluatable at compile time?

    – Aart Stuurman
    Mar 21 at 20:17






  • 6





    Maybe you can do something with std::is_constant_evaluated?

    – 0x5453
    Mar 21 at 20:18











  • en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/if

    – Jesper Juhl
    Mar 21 at 20:18






  • 2





    @AartStuurman: What is do_stuff that it can run at compile time or runtime, but itself should not be constexpr? Wouldn't it make more sense to just make it a constexpr function, and pass it the value of get_data as a parameter?

    – Nicol Bolas
    Mar 21 at 20:38















13















Is there a method to decide whether something can be constexpr evaluated, and use the result as a constexpr boolean? My simplified use case is as follows:



template <typename base>
class derived

template<size_t size>
void do_stuff() (...)

void do_stuff(size_t size) (...)
public:
void execute()

if constexpr(is_constexpr(base::get_data())

do_stuff<base::get_data()>();

else

do_stuff(base::get_data());





My target is C++2a.



I found the following reddit thread, but I'm not a big fan of the macros. https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/7c208c/is_constexpr_a_macro_that_check_if_an_expression/










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    Hmm, the body of a if constexpr will only be evaluated if the expression in the if constexpr is true at compile time. Is that what you are looking for?

    – Jesper Juhl
    Mar 21 at 20:13






  • 1





    But what if the test in the if constexpr([test]) is not evaluatable at compile time?

    – Aart Stuurman
    Mar 21 at 20:17






  • 6





    Maybe you can do something with std::is_constant_evaluated?

    – 0x5453
    Mar 21 at 20:18











  • en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/if

    – Jesper Juhl
    Mar 21 at 20:18






  • 2





    @AartStuurman: What is do_stuff that it can run at compile time or runtime, but itself should not be constexpr? Wouldn't it make more sense to just make it a constexpr function, and pass it the value of get_data as a parameter?

    – Nicol Bolas
    Mar 21 at 20:38













13












13








13


7






Is there a method to decide whether something can be constexpr evaluated, and use the result as a constexpr boolean? My simplified use case is as follows:



template <typename base>
class derived

template<size_t size>
void do_stuff() (...)

void do_stuff(size_t size) (...)
public:
void execute()

if constexpr(is_constexpr(base::get_data())

do_stuff<base::get_data()>();

else

do_stuff(base::get_data());





My target is C++2a.



I found the following reddit thread, but I'm not a big fan of the macros. https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/7c208c/is_constexpr_a_macro_that_check_if_an_expression/










share|improve this question
















Is there a method to decide whether something can be constexpr evaluated, and use the result as a constexpr boolean? My simplified use case is as follows:



template <typename base>
class derived

template<size_t size>
void do_stuff() (...)

void do_stuff(size_t size) (...)
public:
void execute()

if constexpr(is_constexpr(base::get_data())

do_stuff<base::get_data()>();

else

do_stuff(base::get_data());





My target is C++2a.



I found the following reddit thread, but I'm not a big fan of the macros. https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/7c208c/is_constexpr_a_macro_that_check_if_an_expression/







c++ template-meta-programming constexpr c++20 if-constexpr






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 22 at 14:35









max66

38.3k74473




38.3k74473










asked Mar 21 at 20:10









Aart StuurmanAart Stuurman

1,006827




1,006827







  • 1





    Hmm, the body of a if constexpr will only be evaluated if the expression in the if constexpr is true at compile time. Is that what you are looking for?

    – Jesper Juhl
    Mar 21 at 20:13






  • 1





    But what if the test in the if constexpr([test]) is not evaluatable at compile time?

    – Aart Stuurman
    Mar 21 at 20:17






  • 6





    Maybe you can do something with std::is_constant_evaluated?

    – 0x5453
    Mar 21 at 20:18











  • en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/if

    – Jesper Juhl
    Mar 21 at 20:18






  • 2





    @AartStuurman: What is do_stuff that it can run at compile time or runtime, but itself should not be constexpr? Wouldn't it make more sense to just make it a constexpr function, and pass it the value of get_data as a parameter?

    – Nicol Bolas
    Mar 21 at 20:38












  • 1





    Hmm, the body of a if constexpr will only be evaluated if the expression in the if constexpr is true at compile time. Is that what you are looking for?

    – Jesper Juhl
    Mar 21 at 20:13






  • 1





    But what if the test in the if constexpr([test]) is not evaluatable at compile time?

    – Aart Stuurman
    Mar 21 at 20:17






  • 6





    Maybe you can do something with std::is_constant_evaluated?

    – 0x5453
    Mar 21 at 20:18











  • en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/if

    – Jesper Juhl
    Mar 21 at 20:18






  • 2





    @AartStuurman: What is do_stuff that it can run at compile time or runtime, but itself should not be constexpr? Wouldn't it make more sense to just make it a constexpr function, and pass it the value of get_data as a parameter?

    – Nicol Bolas
    Mar 21 at 20:38







1




1





Hmm, the body of a if constexpr will only be evaluated if the expression in the if constexpr is true at compile time. Is that what you are looking for?

– Jesper Juhl
Mar 21 at 20:13





Hmm, the body of a if constexpr will only be evaluated if the expression in the if constexpr is true at compile time. Is that what you are looking for?

– Jesper Juhl
Mar 21 at 20:13




1




1





But what if the test in the if constexpr([test]) is not evaluatable at compile time?

– Aart Stuurman
Mar 21 at 20:17





But what if the test in the if constexpr([test]) is not evaluatable at compile time?

– Aart Stuurman
Mar 21 at 20:17




6




6





Maybe you can do something with std::is_constant_evaluated?

– 0x5453
Mar 21 at 20:18





Maybe you can do something with std::is_constant_evaluated?

– 0x5453
Mar 21 at 20:18













en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/if

– Jesper Juhl
Mar 21 at 20:18





en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/if

– Jesper Juhl
Mar 21 at 20:18




2




2





@AartStuurman: What is do_stuff that it can run at compile time or runtime, but itself should not be constexpr? Wouldn't it make more sense to just make it a constexpr function, and pass it the value of get_data as a parameter?

– Nicol Bolas
Mar 21 at 20:38





@AartStuurman: What is do_stuff that it can run at compile time or runtime, but itself should not be constexpr? Wouldn't it make more sense to just make it a constexpr function, and pass it the value of get_data as a parameter?

– Nicol Bolas
Mar 21 at 20:38












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















13














Here's another solution, which is more generic (applicable to any expression, without defining a separate template each time).



This solution leverages that (1) lambda expressions can be constexpr as of C++17 (2) the type of a captureless lambda is default constructible as of C++20.



The idea is, the overload that returns true is selected when and only when Lambda() can appear within a template argument, which effectively requires the lambda invocation to be a constant expression.



template<class Lambda, int=(Lambda(), 0)>
constexpr bool is_constexpr(Lambda) return true;
constexpr bool is_constexpr(...) return false;

template <typename base>
class derived

// ...

void execute()

if constexpr(is_constexpr([] base::get_data(); ))
do_stuff<base::get_data()>();
else
do_stuff(base::get_data());







share|improve this answer

























  • Intriguing solution... this way you get the same result of my custom type traits but more synthetically and, above all, the exact expression verified (base::get_data()) is embedded in the argument and not hard-coded as in my solution. Very nice. I have to remember it.

    – max66
    Mar 22 at 0:24












  • I am accepting this, because it is an answer to the a generic case of the question. max66 answer is also very useful(in non-c++2a cases), but requires repetition for every usage :)

    – Aart Stuurman
    Mar 22 at 9:42


















10














Not exactly what you asked (I've developer a custom type trait specific for a get_value() static method... maybe it's possible to generalize it but, at the moment, I don't know how) but I suppose you can use SFINAE and make something as follows



#include <iostream>
#include <type_traits>

template <typename T>
constexpr auto icee_helper (int)
-> decltype( std::integral_constant<decltype(T::get_data()), T::get_data()>,
std::true_type );

template <typename>
constexpr auto icee_helper (long)
-> std::false_type;

template <typename T>
using isConstExprEval = decltype(icee_helper<T>(0));

template <typename base>
struct derived

template <std::size_t I>
void do_stuff()
std::cout << "constexpr case (" << I << ')' << std::endl;

void do_stuff (std::size_t i)
std::cout << "not constexpr case (" << i << ')' << std::endl;

void execute ()

if constexpr ( isConstExprEval<base>::value )
do_stuff<base::get_data()>();
else
do_stuff(base::get_data());

;

struct foo
static constexpr std::size_t get_data () return 1u; ;

struct bar
static std::size_t get_data () return 2u; ;

int main ()

derived<foo>.execute(); // print "constexpr case (1)"
derived<bar>.execute(); // print "not constexpr case (2)"






share|improve this answer




















  • 2





    This is madness, this use of the comma operator, the long/int overload... Have an upvote. :/

    – matovitch
    Mar 21 at 21:13











  • @matovitch - never underestimate the power of the comma operator }:‑)

    – max66
    Mar 21 at 21:16











  • Will this work on platforms where sizeof(long) is equal to sizeof(int)?

    – Gregory Nisbet
    Mar 22 at 3:35






  • 2





    @GregoryNisbet - Yes. Because, for the language so for the compiler, they remain different types.

    – max66
    Mar 22 at 8:08


















4














template<auto> struct require_constant;
template<class T>
concept has_constexpr_data = requires typename require_constant<T::get_data()>; ;


This is basically what's used by std::ranges::split_view.






share|improve this answer






















    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    );
    );
    , "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55288555%2fc-check-if-statement-can-be-evaluated-constexpr%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    13














    Here's another solution, which is more generic (applicable to any expression, without defining a separate template each time).



    This solution leverages that (1) lambda expressions can be constexpr as of C++17 (2) the type of a captureless lambda is default constructible as of C++20.



    The idea is, the overload that returns true is selected when and only when Lambda() can appear within a template argument, which effectively requires the lambda invocation to be a constant expression.



    template<class Lambda, int=(Lambda(), 0)>
    constexpr bool is_constexpr(Lambda) return true;
    constexpr bool is_constexpr(...) return false;

    template <typename base>
    class derived

    // ...

    void execute()

    if constexpr(is_constexpr([] base::get_data(); ))
    do_stuff<base::get_data()>();
    else
    do_stuff(base::get_data());







    share|improve this answer

























    • Intriguing solution... this way you get the same result of my custom type traits but more synthetically and, above all, the exact expression verified (base::get_data()) is embedded in the argument and not hard-coded as in my solution. Very nice. I have to remember it.

      – max66
      Mar 22 at 0:24












    • I am accepting this, because it is an answer to the a generic case of the question. max66 answer is also very useful(in non-c++2a cases), but requires repetition for every usage :)

      – Aart Stuurman
      Mar 22 at 9:42















    13














    Here's another solution, which is more generic (applicable to any expression, without defining a separate template each time).



    This solution leverages that (1) lambda expressions can be constexpr as of C++17 (2) the type of a captureless lambda is default constructible as of C++20.



    The idea is, the overload that returns true is selected when and only when Lambda() can appear within a template argument, which effectively requires the lambda invocation to be a constant expression.



    template<class Lambda, int=(Lambda(), 0)>
    constexpr bool is_constexpr(Lambda) return true;
    constexpr bool is_constexpr(...) return false;

    template <typename base>
    class derived

    // ...

    void execute()

    if constexpr(is_constexpr([] base::get_data(); ))
    do_stuff<base::get_data()>();
    else
    do_stuff(base::get_data());







    share|improve this answer

























    • Intriguing solution... this way you get the same result of my custom type traits but more synthetically and, above all, the exact expression verified (base::get_data()) is embedded in the argument and not hard-coded as in my solution. Very nice. I have to remember it.

      – max66
      Mar 22 at 0:24












    • I am accepting this, because it is an answer to the a generic case of the question. max66 answer is also very useful(in non-c++2a cases), but requires repetition for every usage :)

      – Aart Stuurman
      Mar 22 at 9:42













    13












    13








    13







    Here's another solution, which is more generic (applicable to any expression, without defining a separate template each time).



    This solution leverages that (1) lambda expressions can be constexpr as of C++17 (2) the type of a captureless lambda is default constructible as of C++20.



    The idea is, the overload that returns true is selected when and only when Lambda() can appear within a template argument, which effectively requires the lambda invocation to be a constant expression.



    template<class Lambda, int=(Lambda(), 0)>
    constexpr bool is_constexpr(Lambda) return true;
    constexpr bool is_constexpr(...) return false;

    template <typename base>
    class derived

    // ...

    void execute()

    if constexpr(is_constexpr([] base::get_data(); ))
    do_stuff<base::get_data()>();
    else
    do_stuff(base::get_data());







    share|improve this answer















    Here's another solution, which is more generic (applicable to any expression, without defining a separate template each time).



    This solution leverages that (1) lambda expressions can be constexpr as of C++17 (2) the type of a captureless lambda is default constructible as of C++20.



    The idea is, the overload that returns true is selected when and only when Lambda() can appear within a template argument, which effectively requires the lambda invocation to be a constant expression.



    template<class Lambda, int=(Lambda(), 0)>
    constexpr bool is_constexpr(Lambda) return true;
    constexpr bool is_constexpr(...) return false;

    template <typename base>
    class derived

    // ...

    void execute()

    if constexpr(is_constexpr([] base::get_data(); ))
    do_stuff<base::get_data()>();
    else
    do_stuff(base::get_data());








    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Mar 21 at 23:26

























    answered Mar 21 at 22:46









    cpplearnercpplearner

    5,52722342




    5,52722342












    • Intriguing solution... this way you get the same result of my custom type traits but more synthetically and, above all, the exact expression verified (base::get_data()) is embedded in the argument and not hard-coded as in my solution. Very nice. I have to remember it.

      – max66
      Mar 22 at 0:24












    • I am accepting this, because it is an answer to the a generic case of the question. max66 answer is also very useful(in non-c++2a cases), but requires repetition for every usage :)

      – Aart Stuurman
      Mar 22 at 9:42

















    • Intriguing solution... this way you get the same result of my custom type traits but more synthetically and, above all, the exact expression verified (base::get_data()) is embedded in the argument and not hard-coded as in my solution. Very nice. I have to remember it.

      – max66
      Mar 22 at 0:24












    • I am accepting this, because it is an answer to the a generic case of the question. max66 answer is also very useful(in non-c++2a cases), but requires repetition for every usage :)

      – Aart Stuurman
      Mar 22 at 9:42
















    Intriguing solution... this way you get the same result of my custom type traits but more synthetically and, above all, the exact expression verified (base::get_data()) is embedded in the argument and not hard-coded as in my solution. Very nice. I have to remember it.

    – max66
    Mar 22 at 0:24






    Intriguing solution... this way you get the same result of my custom type traits but more synthetically and, above all, the exact expression verified (base::get_data()) is embedded in the argument and not hard-coded as in my solution. Very nice. I have to remember it.

    – max66
    Mar 22 at 0:24














    I am accepting this, because it is an answer to the a generic case of the question. max66 answer is also very useful(in non-c++2a cases), but requires repetition for every usage :)

    – Aart Stuurman
    Mar 22 at 9:42





    I am accepting this, because it is an answer to the a generic case of the question. max66 answer is also very useful(in non-c++2a cases), but requires repetition for every usage :)

    – Aart Stuurman
    Mar 22 at 9:42













    10














    Not exactly what you asked (I've developer a custom type trait specific for a get_value() static method... maybe it's possible to generalize it but, at the moment, I don't know how) but I suppose you can use SFINAE and make something as follows



    #include <iostream>
    #include <type_traits>

    template <typename T>
    constexpr auto icee_helper (int)
    -> decltype( std::integral_constant<decltype(T::get_data()), T::get_data()>,
    std::true_type );

    template <typename>
    constexpr auto icee_helper (long)
    -> std::false_type;

    template <typename T>
    using isConstExprEval = decltype(icee_helper<T>(0));

    template <typename base>
    struct derived

    template <std::size_t I>
    void do_stuff()
    std::cout << "constexpr case (" << I << ')' << std::endl;

    void do_stuff (std::size_t i)
    std::cout << "not constexpr case (" << i << ')' << std::endl;

    void execute ()

    if constexpr ( isConstExprEval<base>::value )
    do_stuff<base::get_data()>();
    else
    do_stuff(base::get_data());

    ;

    struct foo
    static constexpr std::size_t get_data () return 1u; ;

    struct bar
    static std::size_t get_data () return 2u; ;

    int main ()

    derived<foo>.execute(); // print "constexpr case (1)"
    derived<bar>.execute(); // print "not constexpr case (2)"






    share|improve this answer




















    • 2





      This is madness, this use of the comma operator, the long/int overload... Have an upvote. :/

      – matovitch
      Mar 21 at 21:13











    • @matovitch - never underestimate the power of the comma operator }:‑)

      – max66
      Mar 21 at 21:16











    • Will this work on platforms where sizeof(long) is equal to sizeof(int)?

      – Gregory Nisbet
      Mar 22 at 3:35






    • 2





      @GregoryNisbet - Yes. Because, for the language so for the compiler, they remain different types.

      – max66
      Mar 22 at 8:08















    10














    Not exactly what you asked (I've developer a custom type trait specific for a get_value() static method... maybe it's possible to generalize it but, at the moment, I don't know how) but I suppose you can use SFINAE and make something as follows



    #include <iostream>
    #include <type_traits>

    template <typename T>
    constexpr auto icee_helper (int)
    -> decltype( std::integral_constant<decltype(T::get_data()), T::get_data()>,
    std::true_type );

    template <typename>
    constexpr auto icee_helper (long)
    -> std::false_type;

    template <typename T>
    using isConstExprEval = decltype(icee_helper<T>(0));

    template <typename base>
    struct derived

    template <std::size_t I>
    void do_stuff()
    std::cout << "constexpr case (" << I << ')' << std::endl;

    void do_stuff (std::size_t i)
    std::cout << "not constexpr case (" << i << ')' << std::endl;

    void execute ()

    if constexpr ( isConstExprEval<base>::value )
    do_stuff<base::get_data()>();
    else
    do_stuff(base::get_data());

    ;

    struct foo
    static constexpr std::size_t get_data () return 1u; ;

    struct bar
    static std::size_t get_data () return 2u; ;

    int main ()

    derived<foo>.execute(); // print "constexpr case (1)"
    derived<bar>.execute(); // print "not constexpr case (2)"






    share|improve this answer




















    • 2





      This is madness, this use of the comma operator, the long/int overload... Have an upvote. :/

      – matovitch
      Mar 21 at 21:13











    • @matovitch - never underestimate the power of the comma operator }:‑)

      – max66
      Mar 21 at 21:16











    • Will this work on platforms where sizeof(long) is equal to sizeof(int)?

      – Gregory Nisbet
      Mar 22 at 3:35






    • 2





      @GregoryNisbet - Yes. Because, for the language so for the compiler, they remain different types.

      – max66
      Mar 22 at 8:08













    10












    10








    10







    Not exactly what you asked (I've developer a custom type trait specific for a get_value() static method... maybe it's possible to generalize it but, at the moment, I don't know how) but I suppose you can use SFINAE and make something as follows



    #include <iostream>
    #include <type_traits>

    template <typename T>
    constexpr auto icee_helper (int)
    -> decltype( std::integral_constant<decltype(T::get_data()), T::get_data()>,
    std::true_type );

    template <typename>
    constexpr auto icee_helper (long)
    -> std::false_type;

    template <typename T>
    using isConstExprEval = decltype(icee_helper<T>(0));

    template <typename base>
    struct derived

    template <std::size_t I>
    void do_stuff()
    std::cout << "constexpr case (" << I << ')' << std::endl;

    void do_stuff (std::size_t i)
    std::cout << "not constexpr case (" << i << ')' << std::endl;

    void execute ()

    if constexpr ( isConstExprEval<base>::value )
    do_stuff<base::get_data()>();
    else
    do_stuff(base::get_data());

    ;

    struct foo
    static constexpr std::size_t get_data () return 1u; ;

    struct bar
    static std::size_t get_data () return 2u; ;

    int main ()

    derived<foo>.execute(); // print "constexpr case (1)"
    derived<bar>.execute(); // print "not constexpr case (2)"






    share|improve this answer















    Not exactly what you asked (I've developer a custom type trait specific for a get_value() static method... maybe it's possible to generalize it but, at the moment, I don't know how) but I suppose you can use SFINAE and make something as follows



    #include <iostream>
    #include <type_traits>

    template <typename T>
    constexpr auto icee_helper (int)
    -> decltype( std::integral_constant<decltype(T::get_data()), T::get_data()>,
    std::true_type );

    template <typename>
    constexpr auto icee_helper (long)
    -> std::false_type;

    template <typename T>
    using isConstExprEval = decltype(icee_helper<T>(0));

    template <typename base>
    struct derived

    template <std::size_t I>
    void do_stuff()
    std::cout << "constexpr case (" << I << ')' << std::endl;

    void do_stuff (std::size_t i)
    std::cout << "not constexpr case (" << i << ')' << std::endl;

    void execute ()

    if constexpr ( isConstExprEval<base>::value )
    do_stuff<base::get_data()>();
    else
    do_stuff(base::get_data());

    ;

    struct foo
    static constexpr std::size_t get_data () return 1u; ;

    struct bar
    static std::size_t get_data () return 2u; ;

    int main ()

    derived<foo>.execute(); // print "constexpr case (1)"
    derived<bar>.execute(); // print "not constexpr case (2)"







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Mar 21 at 21:07

























    answered Mar 21 at 21:01









    max66max66

    38.3k74473




    38.3k74473







    • 2





      This is madness, this use of the comma operator, the long/int overload... Have an upvote. :/

      – matovitch
      Mar 21 at 21:13











    • @matovitch - never underestimate the power of the comma operator }:‑)

      – max66
      Mar 21 at 21:16











    • Will this work on platforms where sizeof(long) is equal to sizeof(int)?

      – Gregory Nisbet
      Mar 22 at 3:35






    • 2





      @GregoryNisbet - Yes. Because, for the language so for the compiler, they remain different types.

      – max66
      Mar 22 at 8:08












    • 2





      This is madness, this use of the comma operator, the long/int overload... Have an upvote. :/

      – matovitch
      Mar 21 at 21:13











    • @matovitch - never underestimate the power of the comma operator }:‑)

      – max66
      Mar 21 at 21:16











    • Will this work on platforms where sizeof(long) is equal to sizeof(int)?

      – Gregory Nisbet
      Mar 22 at 3:35






    • 2





      @GregoryNisbet - Yes. Because, for the language so for the compiler, they remain different types.

      – max66
      Mar 22 at 8:08







    2




    2





    This is madness, this use of the comma operator, the long/int overload... Have an upvote. :/

    – matovitch
    Mar 21 at 21:13





    This is madness, this use of the comma operator, the long/int overload... Have an upvote. :/

    – matovitch
    Mar 21 at 21:13













    @matovitch - never underestimate the power of the comma operator }:‑)

    – max66
    Mar 21 at 21:16





    @matovitch - never underestimate the power of the comma operator }:‑)

    – max66
    Mar 21 at 21:16













    Will this work on platforms where sizeof(long) is equal to sizeof(int)?

    – Gregory Nisbet
    Mar 22 at 3:35





    Will this work on platforms where sizeof(long) is equal to sizeof(int)?

    – Gregory Nisbet
    Mar 22 at 3:35




    2




    2





    @GregoryNisbet - Yes. Because, for the language so for the compiler, they remain different types.

    – max66
    Mar 22 at 8:08





    @GregoryNisbet - Yes. Because, for the language so for the compiler, they remain different types.

    – max66
    Mar 22 at 8:08











    4














    template<auto> struct require_constant;
    template<class T>
    concept has_constexpr_data = requires typename require_constant<T::get_data()>; ;


    This is basically what's used by std::ranges::split_view.






    share|improve this answer



























      4














      template<auto> struct require_constant;
      template<class T>
      concept has_constexpr_data = requires typename require_constant<T::get_data()>; ;


      This is basically what's used by std::ranges::split_view.






      share|improve this answer

























        4












        4








        4







        template<auto> struct require_constant;
        template<class T>
        concept has_constexpr_data = requires typename require_constant<T::get_data()>; ;


        This is basically what's used by std::ranges::split_view.






        share|improve this answer













        template<auto> struct require_constant;
        template<class T>
        concept has_constexpr_data = requires typename require_constant<T::get_data()>; ;


        This is basically what's used by std::ranges::split_view.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Mar 21 at 21:48









        cpplearnercpplearner

        5,52722342




        5,52722342



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55288555%2fc-check-if-statement-can-be-evaluated-constexpr%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Adding axes to figuresAdding axes labels to LaTeX figuresLaTeX equivalent of ConTeXt buffersRotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?adding axes to shapesAlign axes across subfiguresAdding figures with a certain orderLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themAdding axes labels to LaTeX figures

            Luettelo Yhdysvaltain laivaston lentotukialuksista Lähteet | Navigointivalikko

            Gary (muusikko) Sisällysluettelo Historia | Rockin' High | Lähteet | Aiheesta muualla | NavigointivalikkoInfobox OKTuomas "Gary" Keskinen Ancaran kitaristiksiProjekti Rockin' High