Why does a 97 / 92 key piano exist by Bösendorfer?Why don't pianos use multiples of 12 for the number of keys?Did any player pianos use card decks?playing softly - full grand pianoWhy is the lowest note on the piano an A?Why are the black keys on some ancient fortepianos now white on modern pianos?Second hand piano is out of tune by a whole toneDigital vs Acoustic PianoPiano key sounded like a guitar string on top of regular piano timbre?The Method of Arm weight in Playing the PianoInstruments simultaneous playing in a different key
Invariance of results when scaling explanatory variables in logistic regression, is there a proof?
What is the smallest body in which a sling shot maneuver can be performed?
A car is moving at 40 km/h. A fly at 100 km/h, starts from wall towards the car(20 km away)flies to car and back. How many trips can it make?
Do these cracks on my tires look bad?
Reply ‘no position’ while the job posting is still there (‘HiWi’ position in Germany)
Lightning Web Components - Not available in app builder
Is it okay / does it make sense for another player to join a running game of Munchkin?
Blender - show edges angles “direction”
Should my PhD thesis be submitted under my legal name?
Why does the compiler allow throws when the method will never throw the Exception
Java - What do constructor type arguments mean when placed *before* the type?
Is it possible to build a CPA Secure encryption scheme which remains secure even when the encryption of secret key is given?
The most efficient algorithm to find all possible integer pairs which sum to a given integer
How do I repair my stair bannister?
Modern Day Chaucer
If the dual of a module is finitely generated and projective, can we claim that the module itself is?
What is the term when two people sing in harmony, but they aren't singing the same notes?
Is camera lens focus an exact point or a range?
For airliners, what prevents wing strikes on landing in bad weather?
A social experiment. What is the worst that can happen?
Have I saved too much for retirement so far?
What should I use for Mishna study?
Is there a problem with hiding "forgot password" until it's needed?
Calculating the number of days between 2 dates in Excel
Why does a 97 / 92 key piano exist by Bösendorfer?
Why don't pianos use multiples of 12 for the number of keys?Did any player pianos use card decks?playing softly - full grand pianoWhy is the lowest note on the piano an A?Why are the black keys on some ancient fortepianos now white on modern pianos?Second hand piano is out of tune by a whole toneDigital vs Acoustic PianoPiano key sounded like a guitar string on top of regular piano timbre?The Method of Arm weight in Playing the PianoInstruments simultaneous playing in a different key
Pianos normally have 88 keys, ranging from A0 to C8. One of Bösendorfer's pianos go down to F below the low A. The other model goes down to C. How did this happen?
piano history
add a comment |
Pianos normally have 88 keys, ranging from A0 to C8. One of Bösendorfer's pianos go down to F below the low A. The other model goes down to C. How did this happen?
piano history
7
Personally, I'd ask the opposite question - why did everybody else stop at 88? I mean, I very rarely see any music which uses the top or bottom octave on a standard 88, but that's no reason to not give people the option. Also, if you're looking at any music, say, before mid-Beethoven, they only had a 5-octave range anyhow, so composers faced the same limitations as players. Who knows what they would've written had they the range to do so? You can even see in some early Beethoven where he was struggling to fit certain motifs within the range of the smaller pianos that existed at the time.
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 20 at 15:10
3
@DarrelHoffman - I've seen the bottom octave of the piano used often enough in classical music. In several of those cases, I've even seen those notes notated with ledger lines but no ottava lines.
– Dekkadeci
Mar 20 at 15:31
For example, Tchaikovsky's Piano Concerto No. 1 requires both A0 AND C8 to be played on the piano!
– Maika Sakuranomiya
8 hours ago
I'd suggest they stopped at 88 for a couple of possible reasons. A0 = 27HZ in equal temperament with a baseline of 440 on A4. At a lower pitch range, say, A4=432, if my calculation is correct, A0 is 22.375 HZ. The average range of human hearing is about 20 HZ to 20KHZ ... so A0 is about as low as the human ear could differentiate pitch on the piano in the 1700-1800's. There was just not much point in try to go any lower at the time. The historical gradual upwards shift of the reference tonal center and Bösendorfer's competitive spirit might explain why they make a 92/97 key model.
– Kevin_Kinsey
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Pianos normally have 88 keys, ranging from A0 to C8. One of Bösendorfer's pianos go down to F below the low A. The other model goes down to C. How did this happen?
piano history
Pianos normally have 88 keys, ranging from A0 to C8. One of Bösendorfer's pianos go down to F below the low A. The other model goes down to C. How did this happen?
piano history
piano history
edited Mar 20 at 14:29
Richard
43.7k7102187
43.7k7102187
asked Mar 19 at 23:33
Maika SakuranomiyaMaika Sakuranomiya
9061430
9061430
7
Personally, I'd ask the opposite question - why did everybody else stop at 88? I mean, I very rarely see any music which uses the top or bottom octave on a standard 88, but that's no reason to not give people the option. Also, if you're looking at any music, say, before mid-Beethoven, they only had a 5-octave range anyhow, so composers faced the same limitations as players. Who knows what they would've written had they the range to do so? You can even see in some early Beethoven where he was struggling to fit certain motifs within the range of the smaller pianos that existed at the time.
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 20 at 15:10
3
@DarrelHoffman - I've seen the bottom octave of the piano used often enough in classical music. In several of those cases, I've even seen those notes notated with ledger lines but no ottava lines.
– Dekkadeci
Mar 20 at 15:31
For example, Tchaikovsky's Piano Concerto No. 1 requires both A0 AND C8 to be played on the piano!
– Maika Sakuranomiya
8 hours ago
I'd suggest they stopped at 88 for a couple of possible reasons. A0 = 27HZ in equal temperament with a baseline of 440 on A4. At a lower pitch range, say, A4=432, if my calculation is correct, A0 is 22.375 HZ. The average range of human hearing is about 20 HZ to 20KHZ ... so A0 is about as low as the human ear could differentiate pitch on the piano in the 1700-1800's. There was just not much point in try to go any lower at the time. The historical gradual upwards shift of the reference tonal center and Bösendorfer's competitive spirit might explain why they make a 92/97 key model.
– Kevin_Kinsey
3 hours ago
add a comment |
7
Personally, I'd ask the opposite question - why did everybody else stop at 88? I mean, I very rarely see any music which uses the top or bottom octave on a standard 88, but that's no reason to not give people the option. Also, if you're looking at any music, say, before mid-Beethoven, they only had a 5-octave range anyhow, so composers faced the same limitations as players. Who knows what they would've written had they the range to do so? You can even see in some early Beethoven where he was struggling to fit certain motifs within the range of the smaller pianos that existed at the time.
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 20 at 15:10
3
@DarrelHoffman - I've seen the bottom octave of the piano used often enough in classical music. In several of those cases, I've even seen those notes notated with ledger lines but no ottava lines.
– Dekkadeci
Mar 20 at 15:31
For example, Tchaikovsky's Piano Concerto No. 1 requires both A0 AND C8 to be played on the piano!
– Maika Sakuranomiya
8 hours ago
I'd suggest they stopped at 88 for a couple of possible reasons. A0 = 27HZ in equal temperament with a baseline of 440 on A4. At a lower pitch range, say, A4=432, if my calculation is correct, A0 is 22.375 HZ. The average range of human hearing is about 20 HZ to 20KHZ ... so A0 is about as low as the human ear could differentiate pitch on the piano in the 1700-1800's. There was just not much point in try to go any lower at the time. The historical gradual upwards shift of the reference tonal center and Bösendorfer's competitive spirit might explain why they make a 92/97 key model.
– Kevin_Kinsey
3 hours ago
7
7
Personally, I'd ask the opposite question - why did everybody else stop at 88? I mean, I very rarely see any music which uses the top or bottom octave on a standard 88, but that's no reason to not give people the option. Also, if you're looking at any music, say, before mid-Beethoven, they only had a 5-octave range anyhow, so composers faced the same limitations as players. Who knows what they would've written had they the range to do so? You can even see in some early Beethoven where he was struggling to fit certain motifs within the range of the smaller pianos that existed at the time.
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 20 at 15:10
Personally, I'd ask the opposite question - why did everybody else stop at 88? I mean, I very rarely see any music which uses the top or bottom octave on a standard 88, but that's no reason to not give people the option. Also, if you're looking at any music, say, before mid-Beethoven, they only had a 5-octave range anyhow, so composers faced the same limitations as players. Who knows what they would've written had they the range to do so? You can even see in some early Beethoven where he was struggling to fit certain motifs within the range of the smaller pianos that existed at the time.
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 20 at 15:10
3
3
@DarrelHoffman - I've seen the bottom octave of the piano used often enough in classical music. In several of those cases, I've even seen those notes notated with ledger lines but no ottava lines.
– Dekkadeci
Mar 20 at 15:31
@DarrelHoffman - I've seen the bottom octave of the piano used often enough in classical music. In several of those cases, I've even seen those notes notated with ledger lines but no ottava lines.
– Dekkadeci
Mar 20 at 15:31
For example, Tchaikovsky's Piano Concerto No. 1 requires both A0 AND C8 to be played on the piano!
– Maika Sakuranomiya
8 hours ago
For example, Tchaikovsky's Piano Concerto No. 1 requires both A0 AND C8 to be played on the piano!
– Maika Sakuranomiya
8 hours ago
I'd suggest they stopped at 88 for a couple of possible reasons. A0 = 27HZ in equal temperament with a baseline of 440 on A4. At a lower pitch range, say, A4=432, if my calculation is correct, A0 is 22.375 HZ. The average range of human hearing is about 20 HZ to 20KHZ ... so A0 is about as low as the human ear could differentiate pitch on the piano in the 1700-1800's. There was just not much point in try to go any lower at the time. The historical gradual upwards shift of the reference tonal center and Bösendorfer's competitive spirit might explain why they make a 92/97 key model.
– Kevin_Kinsey
3 hours ago
I'd suggest they stopped at 88 for a couple of possible reasons. A0 = 27HZ in equal temperament with a baseline of 440 on A4. At a lower pitch range, say, A4=432, if my calculation is correct, A0 is 22.375 HZ. The average range of human hearing is about 20 HZ to 20KHZ ... so A0 is about as low as the human ear could differentiate pitch on the piano in the 1700-1800's. There was just not much point in try to go any lower at the time. The historical gradual upwards shift of the reference tonal center and Bösendorfer's competitive spirit might explain why they make a 92/97 key model.
– Kevin_Kinsey
3 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
These extended Bösendorfer ranges go back to Busoni's day. He wanted to match the range of pipe organs, as he was making transcriptions of J. S. Bach's organ works at the time.
5
@CarlWitthoft It only makes sense that they continue to make them because people buy them.
– Mohair
Mar 20 at 15:30
1
And then somebody built an organ with a 64' stop...
– Hobbes
Mar 20 at 17:48
add a comment |
replete's answer is correct that the original reason was to have a bigger range, as needed for some organ music. However, I don't think that's the reason those Imperial models are so sought-for over all these years – actually playing the lowest notest is scarcely musically useful.
The reason why people want Bösendorfer Imperial is that they sound awesome, even when the low strings aren't played. This probably has two main reasons:
- The big sound frame is better at transmitting all frequencies, in particular those on the low end of the regular range. These strings aren't already at the very limit of what the resonator can do, like they are on many other pianos, but still in the range of what it can comfortably do, so thundering octaves actually thunder and don't just “clank”.
- The low strings give a denser sympathetic-resonance spectrum, when the pedal is pushed. As a result, a Bösendorfer has a richer sound even in high, soft, legato passages.
13
Plus to a pianist, a Bosendorfer is like a 2-ton pickup to a Texan :-)
– Carl Witthoft
Mar 20 at 15:00
add a comment |
Yep. There's of course another reason than cannot be underestimated: bling.
5
Hey, I live in Bösendorfer's home town. You can't tell me that they don't sell their image.
– Scott Wallace
Mar 20 at 11:43
I don't doubt that they promote their own image, but on the other hand, have you ever tried playing one?
– David K
Mar 22 at 3:47
@DavidK - can't say I have. I'm sure they sound great. But honestly- how often do we need these notes?
– Scott Wallace
Mar 22 at 9:46
I believe the one I tried had just the usual 88 notes. But they all sounded great from one end of the keyboard to the other. That makes an astoundingly good-sounding piano. Also an astoundingly high price.
– David K
Mar 22 at 12:27
Oh, I thought you meant one with extended bass. I've played the normal 88 keyed ones. Yes, they are very nice modern pianos, and beautifully made too.
– Scott Wallace
Mar 22 at 15:12
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "240"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81677%2fwhy-does-a-97-92-key-piano-exist-by-b%25c3%25b6sendorfer%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
These extended Bösendorfer ranges go back to Busoni's day. He wanted to match the range of pipe organs, as he was making transcriptions of J. S. Bach's organ works at the time.
5
@CarlWitthoft It only makes sense that they continue to make them because people buy them.
– Mohair
Mar 20 at 15:30
1
And then somebody built an organ with a 64' stop...
– Hobbes
Mar 20 at 17:48
add a comment |
These extended Bösendorfer ranges go back to Busoni's day. He wanted to match the range of pipe organs, as he was making transcriptions of J. S. Bach's organ works at the time.
5
@CarlWitthoft It only makes sense that they continue to make them because people buy them.
– Mohair
Mar 20 at 15:30
1
And then somebody built an organ with a 64' stop...
– Hobbes
Mar 20 at 17:48
add a comment |
These extended Bösendorfer ranges go back to Busoni's day. He wanted to match the range of pipe organs, as he was making transcriptions of J. S. Bach's organ works at the time.
These extended Bösendorfer ranges go back to Busoni's day. He wanted to match the range of pipe organs, as he was making transcriptions of J. S. Bach's organ works at the time.
edited Mar 20 at 2:52
Russell Borogove
1336
1336
answered Mar 19 at 23:38
repletereplete
3,572823
3,572823
5
@CarlWitthoft It only makes sense that they continue to make them because people buy them.
– Mohair
Mar 20 at 15:30
1
And then somebody built an organ with a 64' stop...
– Hobbes
Mar 20 at 17:48
add a comment |
5
@CarlWitthoft It only makes sense that they continue to make them because people buy them.
– Mohair
Mar 20 at 15:30
1
And then somebody built an organ with a 64' stop...
– Hobbes
Mar 20 at 17:48
5
5
@CarlWitthoft It only makes sense that they continue to make them because people buy them.
– Mohair
Mar 20 at 15:30
@CarlWitthoft It only makes sense that they continue to make them because people buy them.
– Mohair
Mar 20 at 15:30
1
1
And then somebody built an organ with a 64' stop...
– Hobbes
Mar 20 at 17:48
And then somebody built an organ with a 64' stop...
– Hobbes
Mar 20 at 17:48
add a comment |
replete's answer is correct that the original reason was to have a bigger range, as needed for some organ music. However, I don't think that's the reason those Imperial models are so sought-for over all these years – actually playing the lowest notest is scarcely musically useful.
The reason why people want Bösendorfer Imperial is that they sound awesome, even when the low strings aren't played. This probably has two main reasons:
- The big sound frame is better at transmitting all frequencies, in particular those on the low end of the regular range. These strings aren't already at the very limit of what the resonator can do, like they are on many other pianos, but still in the range of what it can comfortably do, so thundering octaves actually thunder and don't just “clank”.
- The low strings give a denser sympathetic-resonance spectrum, when the pedal is pushed. As a result, a Bösendorfer has a richer sound even in high, soft, legato passages.
13
Plus to a pianist, a Bosendorfer is like a 2-ton pickup to a Texan :-)
– Carl Witthoft
Mar 20 at 15:00
add a comment |
replete's answer is correct that the original reason was to have a bigger range, as needed for some organ music. However, I don't think that's the reason those Imperial models are so sought-for over all these years – actually playing the lowest notest is scarcely musically useful.
The reason why people want Bösendorfer Imperial is that they sound awesome, even when the low strings aren't played. This probably has two main reasons:
- The big sound frame is better at transmitting all frequencies, in particular those on the low end of the regular range. These strings aren't already at the very limit of what the resonator can do, like they are on many other pianos, but still in the range of what it can comfortably do, so thundering octaves actually thunder and don't just “clank”.
- The low strings give a denser sympathetic-resonance spectrum, when the pedal is pushed. As a result, a Bösendorfer has a richer sound even in high, soft, legato passages.
13
Plus to a pianist, a Bosendorfer is like a 2-ton pickup to a Texan :-)
– Carl Witthoft
Mar 20 at 15:00
add a comment |
replete's answer is correct that the original reason was to have a bigger range, as needed for some organ music. However, I don't think that's the reason those Imperial models are so sought-for over all these years – actually playing the lowest notest is scarcely musically useful.
The reason why people want Bösendorfer Imperial is that they sound awesome, even when the low strings aren't played. This probably has two main reasons:
- The big sound frame is better at transmitting all frequencies, in particular those on the low end of the regular range. These strings aren't already at the very limit of what the resonator can do, like they are on many other pianos, but still in the range of what it can comfortably do, so thundering octaves actually thunder and don't just “clank”.
- The low strings give a denser sympathetic-resonance spectrum, when the pedal is pushed. As a result, a Bösendorfer has a richer sound even in high, soft, legato passages.
replete's answer is correct that the original reason was to have a bigger range, as needed for some organ music. However, I don't think that's the reason those Imperial models are so sought-for over all these years – actually playing the lowest notest is scarcely musically useful.
The reason why people want Bösendorfer Imperial is that they sound awesome, even when the low strings aren't played. This probably has two main reasons:
- The big sound frame is better at transmitting all frequencies, in particular those on the low end of the regular range. These strings aren't already at the very limit of what the resonator can do, like they are on many other pianos, but still in the range of what it can comfortably do, so thundering octaves actually thunder and don't just “clank”.
- The low strings give a denser sympathetic-resonance spectrum, when the pedal is pushed. As a result, a Bösendorfer has a richer sound even in high, soft, legato passages.
answered Mar 20 at 5:58
leftaroundaboutleftaroundabout
20.5k3690
20.5k3690
13
Plus to a pianist, a Bosendorfer is like a 2-ton pickup to a Texan :-)
– Carl Witthoft
Mar 20 at 15:00
add a comment |
13
Plus to a pianist, a Bosendorfer is like a 2-ton pickup to a Texan :-)
– Carl Witthoft
Mar 20 at 15:00
13
13
Plus to a pianist, a Bosendorfer is like a 2-ton pickup to a Texan :-)
– Carl Witthoft
Mar 20 at 15:00
Plus to a pianist, a Bosendorfer is like a 2-ton pickup to a Texan :-)
– Carl Witthoft
Mar 20 at 15:00
add a comment |
Yep. There's of course another reason than cannot be underestimated: bling.
5
Hey, I live in Bösendorfer's home town. You can't tell me that they don't sell their image.
– Scott Wallace
Mar 20 at 11:43
I don't doubt that they promote their own image, but on the other hand, have you ever tried playing one?
– David K
Mar 22 at 3:47
@DavidK - can't say I have. I'm sure they sound great. But honestly- how often do we need these notes?
– Scott Wallace
Mar 22 at 9:46
I believe the one I tried had just the usual 88 notes. But they all sounded great from one end of the keyboard to the other. That makes an astoundingly good-sounding piano. Also an astoundingly high price.
– David K
Mar 22 at 12:27
Oh, I thought you meant one with extended bass. I've played the normal 88 keyed ones. Yes, they are very nice modern pianos, and beautifully made too.
– Scott Wallace
Mar 22 at 15:12
add a comment |
Yep. There's of course another reason than cannot be underestimated: bling.
5
Hey, I live in Bösendorfer's home town. You can't tell me that they don't sell their image.
– Scott Wallace
Mar 20 at 11:43
I don't doubt that they promote their own image, but on the other hand, have you ever tried playing one?
– David K
Mar 22 at 3:47
@DavidK - can't say I have. I'm sure they sound great. But honestly- how often do we need these notes?
– Scott Wallace
Mar 22 at 9:46
I believe the one I tried had just the usual 88 notes. But they all sounded great from one end of the keyboard to the other. That makes an astoundingly good-sounding piano. Also an astoundingly high price.
– David K
Mar 22 at 12:27
Oh, I thought you meant one with extended bass. I've played the normal 88 keyed ones. Yes, they are very nice modern pianos, and beautifully made too.
– Scott Wallace
Mar 22 at 15:12
add a comment |
Yep. There's of course another reason than cannot be underestimated: bling.
Yep. There's of course another reason than cannot be underestimated: bling.
answered Mar 20 at 9:34
Scott WallaceScott Wallace
4,4711017
4,4711017
5
Hey, I live in Bösendorfer's home town. You can't tell me that they don't sell their image.
– Scott Wallace
Mar 20 at 11:43
I don't doubt that they promote their own image, but on the other hand, have you ever tried playing one?
– David K
Mar 22 at 3:47
@DavidK - can't say I have. I'm sure they sound great. But honestly- how often do we need these notes?
– Scott Wallace
Mar 22 at 9:46
I believe the one I tried had just the usual 88 notes. But they all sounded great from one end of the keyboard to the other. That makes an astoundingly good-sounding piano. Also an astoundingly high price.
– David K
Mar 22 at 12:27
Oh, I thought you meant one with extended bass. I've played the normal 88 keyed ones. Yes, they are very nice modern pianos, and beautifully made too.
– Scott Wallace
Mar 22 at 15:12
add a comment |
5
Hey, I live in Bösendorfer's home town. You can't tell me that they don't sell their image.
– Scott Wallace
Mar 20 at 11:43
I don't doubt that they promote their own image, but on the other hand, have you ever tried playing one?
– David K
Mar 22 at 3:47
@DavidK - can't say I have. I'm sure they sound great. But honestly- how often do we need these notes?
– Scott Wallace
Mar 22 at 9:46
I believe the one I tried had just the usual 88 notes. But they all sounded great from one end of the keyboard to the other. That makes an astoundingly good-sounding piano. Also an astoundingly high price.
– David K
Mar 22 at 12:27
Oh, I thought you meant one with extended bass. I've played the normal 88 keyed ones. Yes, they are very nice modern pianos, and beautifully made too.
– Scott Wallace
Mar 22 at 15:12
5
5
Hey, I live in Bösendorfer's home town. You can't tell me that they don't sell their image.
– Scott Wallace
Mar 20 at 11:43
Hey, I live in Bösendorfer's home town. You can't tell me that they don't sell their image.
– Scott Wallace
Mar 20 at 11:43
I don't doubt that they promote their own image, but on the other hand, have you ever tried playing one?
– David K
Mar 22 at 3:47
I don't doubt that they promote their own image, but on the other hand, have you ever tried playing one?
– David K
Mar 22 at 3:47
@DavidK - can't say I have. I'm sure they sound great. But honestly- how often do we need these notes?
– Scott Wallace
Mar 22 at 9:46
@DavidK - can't say I have. I'm sure they sound great. But honestly- how often do we need these notes?
– Scott Wallace
Mar 22 at 9:46
I believe the one I tried had just the usual 88 notes. But they all sounded great from one end of the keyboard to the other. That makes an astoundingly good-sounding piano. Also an astoundingly high price.
– David K
Mar 22 at 12:27
I believe the one I tried had just the usual 88 notes. But they all sounded great from one end of the keyboard to the other. That makes an astoundingly good-sounding piano. Also an astoundingly high price.
– David K
Mar 22 at 12:27
Oh, I thought you meant one with extended bass. I've played the normal 88 keyed ones. Yes, they are very nice modern pianos, and beautifully made too.
– Scott Wallace
Mar 22 at 15:12
Oh, I thought you meant one with extended bass. I've played the normal 88 keyed ones. Yes, they are very nice modern pianos, and beautifully made too.
– Scott Wallace
Mar 22 at 15:12
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81677%2fwhy-does-a-97-92-key-piano-exist-by-b%25c3%25b6sendorfer%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
7
Personally, I'd ask the opposite question - why did everybody else stop at 88? I mean, I very rarely see any music which uses the top or bottom octave on a standard 88, but that's no reason to not give people the option. Also, if you're looking at any music, say, before mid-Beethoven, they only had a 5-octave range anyhow, so composers faced the same limitations as players. Who knows what they would've written had they the range to do so? You can even see in some early Beethoven where he was struggling to fit certain motifs within the range of the smaller pianos that existed at the time.
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 20 at 15:10
3
@DarrelHoffman - I've seen the bottom octave of the piano used often enough in classical music. In several of those cases, I've even seen those notes notated with ledger lines but no ottava lines.
– Dekkadeci
Mar 20 at 15:31
For example, Tchaikovsky's Piano Concerto No. 1 requires both A0 AND C8 to be played on the piano!
– Maika Sakuranomiya
8 hours ago
I'd suggest they stopped at 88 for a couple of possible reasons. A0 = 27HZ in equal temperament with a baseline of 440 on A4. At a lower pitch range, say, A4=432, if my calculation is correct, A0 is 22.375 HZ. The average range of human hearing is about 20 HZ to 20KHZ ... so A0 is about as low as the human ear could differentiate pitch on the piano in the 1700-1800's. There was just not much point in try to go any lower at the time. The historical gradual upwards shift of the reference tonal center and Bösendorfer's competitive spirit might explain why they make a 92/97 key model.
– Kevin_Kinsey
3 hours ago