Left multiplication is homeomorphism of topological groups The Next CEO of Stack OverflowGroup topology and free topological groupsAxiomatizing topology through continuous mapsUniform continuity of scalar multiplication in topological vector spacesCusp is homeomorphic to $mathbbR^n=1$Are topological fiber bundles on the same base with homeomorphic fibers isomorphic?Topological group of units of a topological ringOne-point compactification of disjoint union is homeomorphic to wedge sum of one-point compactificationsQuotient map from topological group onto left cosets is openProve that the map $nmapsto 1/n, infty mapsto 0$ is a homeomorphismMaking the subgroup of units of a topological ring a topological group

Make solar eclipses exceedingly rare, but still have new moons

Not able to read bus schedule in France

If a black hole is created from light, can this black hole then move at the speed of light?

square root of the periodic function need to be periodic?

If the updated MCAS software needs two AOA sensors, doesn't that introduce a new single point of failure?

How to place nodes around a circle from some initial angle?

How to prevent changing the value of variable

Why do we use the plural of movies in this phrase "We went to the movies last night."?

Unreliable Magic - Is it worth it?

WOW air has ceased operation, can I get my tickets refunded?

Help understanding this unsettling image of Titan, Epimetheus, and Saturn's rings?

Where do students learn to solve polynomial equations these days?

What can we do to stop prior company from asking us questions?

How to get from Geneva Airport to Metabief?

The exact meaning of 'Mom made me a sandwich'

Is there a way to save my career from absolute disaster?

Why, when going from special to general relativity, do we just replace partial derivatives with covariant derivatives?

Is wanting to ask what to write an indication that you need to change your story?

What was the first Unix version to run on a microcomputer?

Is it professional to write unrelated content in an almost-empty email?

Grabbing quick drinks

Flying from Cape Town to England and return to another province

Why is quantifier elimination desirable for a given theory?

Are there any unintended negative consequences to allowing PCs to gain multiple levels at once in a short milestone-XP game?



Left multiplication is homeomorphism of topological groups



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowGroup topology and free topological groupsAxiomatizing topology through continuous mapsUniform continuity of scalar multiplication in topological vector spacesCusp is homeomorphic to $mathbbR^n=1$Are topological fiber bundles on the same base with homeomorphic fibers isomorphic?Topological group of units of a topological ringOne-point compactification of disjoint union is homeomorphic to wedge sum of one-point compactificationsQuotient map from topological group onto left cosets is openProve that the map $nmapsto 1/n, infty mapsto 0$ is a homeomorphismMaking the subgroup of units of a topological ring a topological group










2












$begingroup$


This is a very simple question involving basic definitions.
I want to prove that if $G$ is a topological group, left multiplication $f_acolon gmapsto ag$ is a homeomorphism of $G$.
Clearly, this map is bijective and it sufficies to show its continuity.



To prove continuity, if $U(ag)$ is an open nhbd of $agin G$, there are open nhbds $V(a)$, $W(g)$ s.t. $V(a)W(g)subseteq U(ag)$, from which I get $aW(g)subseteq U(ag)$.



Here I stuck. Can I conclude it is open? If yes, why?



Thank you in advance for your help.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Just notice left multiplication is a restiction of the multiplication function to the subspace $atimes G$
    $endgroup$
    – YuiTo Cheng
    Mar 25 at 15:28







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    In the end, it sufficies to notice that the restriction of a continuous function is continuous.
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 25 at 15:47






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    And this is straightforward
    $endgroup$
    – YuiTo Cheng
    Mar 25 at 15:50










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much!
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 25 at 15:52















2












$begingroup$


This is a very simple question involving basic definitions.
I want to prove that if $G$ is a topological group, left multiplication $f_acolon gmapsto ag$ is a homeomorphism of $G$.
Clearly, this map is bijective and it sufficies to show its continuity.



To prove continuity, if $U(ag)$ is an open nhbd of $agin G$, there are open nhbds $V(a)$, $W(g)$ s.t. $V(a)W(g)subseteq U(ag)$, from which I get $aW(g)subseteq U(ag)$.



Here I stuck. Can I conclude it is open? If yes, why?



Thank you in advance for your help.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Just notice left multiplication is a restiction of the multiplication function to the subspace $atimes G$
    $endgroup$
    – YuiTo Cheng
    Mar 25 at 15:28







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    In the end, it sufficies to notice that the restriction of a continuous function is continuous.
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 25 at 15:47






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    And this is straightforward
    $endgroup$
    – YuiTo Cheng
    Mar 25 at 15:50










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much!
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 25 at 15:52













2












2








2





$begingroup$


This is a very simple question involving basic definitions.
I want to prove that if $G$ is a topological group, left multiplication $f_acolon gmapsto ag$ is a homeomorphism of $G$.
Clearly, this map is bijective and it sufficies to show its continuity.



To prove continuity, if $U(ag)$ is an open nhbd of $agin G$, there are open nhbds $V(a)$, $W(g)$ s.t. $V(a)W(g)subseteq U(ag)$, from which I get $aW(g)subseteq U(ag)$.



Here I stuck. Can I conclude it is open? If yes, why?



Thank you in advance for your help.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




This is a very simple question involving basic definitions.
I want to prove that if $G$ is a topological group, left multiplication $f_acolon gmapsto ag$ is a homeomorphism of $G$.
Clearly, this map is bijective and it sufficies to show its continuity.



To prove continuity, if $U(ag)$ is an open nhbd of $agin G$, there are open nhbds $V(a)$, $W(g)$ s.t. $V(a)W(g)subseteq U(ag)$, from which I get $aW(g)subseteq U(ag)$.



Here I stuck. Can I conclude it is open? If yes, why?



Thank you in advance for your help.







general-topology continuity topological-groups






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 25 at 15:53







LBJFS

















asked Mar 25 at 15:24









LBJFSLBJFS

32011




32011







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Just notice left multiplication is a restiction of the multiplication function to the subspace $atimes G$
    $endgroup$
    – YuiTo Cheng
    Mar 25 at 15:28







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    In the end, it sufficies to notice that the restriction of a continuous function is continuous.
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 25 at 15:47






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    And this is straightforward
    $endgroup$
    – YuiTo Cheng
    Mar 25 at 15:50










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much!
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 25 at 15:52












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Just notice left multiplication is a restiction of the multiplication function to the subspace $atimes G$
    $endgroup$
    – YuiTo Cheng
    Mar 25 at 15:28







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    In the end, it sufficies to notice that the restriction of a continuous function is continuous.
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 25 at 15:47






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    And this is straightforward
    $endgroup$
    – YuiTo Cheng
    Mar 25 at 15:50










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much!
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 25 at 15:52







1




1




$begingroup$
Just notice left multiplication is a restiction of the multiplication function to the subspace $atimes G$
$endgroup$
– YuiTo Cheng
Mar 25 at 15:28





$begingroup$
Just notice left multiplication is a restiction of the multiplication function to the subspace $atimes G$
$endgroup$
– YuiTo Cheng
Mar 25 at 15:28





1




1




$begingroup$
In the end, it sufficies to notice that the restriction of a continuous function is continuous.
$endgroup$
– LBJFS
Mar 25 at 15:47




$begingroup$
In the end, it sufficies to notice that the restriction of a continuous function is continuous.
$endgroup$
– LBJFS
Mar 25 at 15:47




1




1




$begingroup$
And this is straightforward
$endgroup$
– YuiTo Cheng
Mar 25 at 15:50




$begingroup$
And this is straightforward
$endgroup$
– YuiTo Cheng
Mar 25 at 15:50












$begingroup$
Thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– LBJFS
Mar 25 at 15:52




$begingroup$
Thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– LBJFS
Mar 25 at 15:52










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Hint:



For a topological group $G $, the map $f:G×Gto G $ sending $(x,y) $ to $xcdot y $ is continuous. Now $f_a $ is nothing but $f $ restricted to $a×G $. So what can you conclude?






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    2












    $begingroup$

    The map $f_a$ is continuous because, by the definition of topological group, the multiplication is continuous.



    And the inverse of $f_a$ is $f_a^-1$, which is continuous by the same reason.



    Therefore, $f_a$ is a homeomorphism.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      2












      $begingroup$

      This is essentially rephrasing the other answer, but in a Category Theoretic perspective:



      Let Top be the category of Topological Spaces and continuous maps. A group object in Top is a topological group, ie. a topological space equipped with continuous maps $m:Gtimes Grightarrow G$, $1:*rightarrow G$, and $(-)^-1:Grightarrow G$ expressing multiplication, identity, and inversion.



      Since $Gtimes G$ is the product of topological spaces, it is equipped with continuous projections $pi_G:Gtimes Grightarrow G$ mapping $(g,h)mapsto g.$



      Furthermore, a group G considered as a category is a category where the only object is the group $G$, and morphisms are left (or right - left is what's relevant here) multiplication by elements of $G$. These are isomorphisms since the coset $gG = G$.



      Together, we have the desired result.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        I don't know category theory, but I love different perspectives! Thank you very much.
        $endgroup$
        – LBJFS
        Mar 25 at 16:05










      • $begingroup$
        I'm not a category theorist, but I like to think that I'm fairly familiar with the basics. Yet I do not see how the facts you stated give the result. Could you elaborate?
        $endgroup$
        – tomasz
        Mar 25 at 16:54










      • $begingroup$
        @tomasz I elaborated a bit. Hopefully this makes more sense.
        $endgroup$
        – user458276
        Mar 25 at 23:11










      • $begingroup$
        I still don't see how it helps. You just added a bunch of defintions (all of which I've known before). The important point here is that the map $Gto G^2$, $gmapsto (a,g)$ is a morphism. I don't see how it follows. I mean, it would seem reasonable if it did (it would be desirable if for any group object in any concrete category, translation was a morphism), but I don't think it's obvious.
        $endgroup$
        – tomasz
        Mar 26 at 11:41



















      1












      $begingroup$

      Hint: if $fcolon Xtimes Yto Z$ is continuous, then it is also coordinatewise continous, i.e. for every $xin X$ and $yin Y$, the functions $f_xcolon Yto Z$, $ymapsto f(x,y)$ and $f_ycolon Xto Z$, $xmapsto f(x,y)$ are both continuous. This follows from the observation that if $Usubseteq Xtimes Y$ is open, then so are its cross-sections (which is immediate by the definition of the product topology).



      Note that none of the implications mentioned in the preceding paragraph reverse. This is why in general, a semitopological group need not be topological (although there are some very powerful "automatic continuity" theorems for algebraic structures like groups).






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        );
        );
        , "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );













        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3161917%2fleft-multiplication-is-homeomorphism-of-topological-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        3












        $begingroup$

        Hint:



        For a topological group $G $, the map $f:G×Gto G $ sending $(x,y) $ to $xcdot y $ is continuous. Now $f_a $ is nothing but $f $ restricted to $a×G $. So what can you conclude?






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$

















          3












          $begingroup$

          Hint:



          For a topological group $G $, the map $f:G×Gto G $ sending $(x,y) $ to $xcdot y $ is continuous. Now $f_a $ is nothing but $f $ restricted to $a×G $. So what can you conclude?






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$















            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            Hint:



            For a topological group $G $, the map $f:G×Gto G $ sending $(x,y) $ to $xcdot y $ is continuous. Now $f_a $ is nothing but $f $ restricted to $a×G $. So what can you conclude?






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Hint:



            For a topological group $G $, the map $f:G×Gto G $ sending $(x,y) $ to $xcdot y $ is continuous. Now $f_a $ is nothing but $f $ restricted to $a×G $. So what can you conclude?







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Mar 25 at 15:29









            Thomas ShelbyThomas Shelby

            4,5762727




            4,5762727





















                2












                $begingroup$

                The map $f_a$ is continuous because, by the definition of topological group, the multiplication is continuous.



                And the inverse of $f_a$ is $f_a^-1$, which is continuous by the same reason.



                Therefore, $f_a$ is a homeomorphism.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$

















                  2












                  $begingroup$

                  The map $f_a$ is continuous because, by the definition of topological group, the multiplication is continuous.



                  And the inverse of $f_a$ is $f_a^-1$, which is continuous by the same reason.



                  Therefore, $f_a$ is a homeomorphism.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$















                    2












                    2








                    2





                    $begingroup$

                    The map $f_a$ is continuous because, by the definition of topological group, the multiplication is continuous.



                    And the inverse of $f_a$ is $f_a^-1$, which is continuous by the same reason.



                    Therefore, $f_a$ is a homeomorphism.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    The map $f_a$ is continuous because, by the definition of topological group, the multiplication is continuous.



                    And the inverse of $f_a$ is $f_a^-1$, which is continuous by the same reason.



                    Therefore, $f_a$ is a homeomorphism.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Mar 25 at 15:26









                    José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

                    171k23132240




                    171k23132240





















                        2












                        $begingroup$

                        This is essentially rephrasing the other answer, but in a Category Theoretic perspective:



                        Let Top be the category of Topological Spaces and continuous maps. A group object in Top is a topological group, ie. a topological space equipped with continuous maps $m:Gtimes Grightarrow G$, $1:*rightarrow G$, and $(-)^-1:Grightarrow G$ expressing multiplication, identity, and inversion.



                        Since $Gtimes G$ is the product of topological spaces, it is equipped with continuous projections $pi_G:Gtimes Grightarrow G$ mapping $(g,h)mapsto g.$



                        Furthermore, a group G considered as a category is a category where the only object is the group $G$, and morphisms are left (or right - left is what's relevant here) multiplication by elements of $G$. These are isomorphisms since the coset $gG = G$.



                        Together, we have the desired result.






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$












                        • $begingroup$
                          I don't know category theory, but I love different perspectives! Thank you very much.
                          $endgroup$
                          – LBJFS
                          Mar 25 at 16:05










                        • $begingroup$
                          I'm not a category theorist, but I like to think that I'm fairly familiar with the basics. Yet I do not see how the facts you stated give the result. Could you elaborate?
                          $endgroup$
                          – tomasz
                          Mar 25 at 16:54










                        • $begingroup$
                          @tomasz I elaborated a bit. Hopefully this makes more sense.
                          $endgroup$
                          – user458276
                          Mar 25 at 23:11










                        • $begingroup$
                          I still don't see how it helps. You just added a bunch of defintions (all of which I've known before). The important point here is that the map $Gto G^2$, $gmapsto (a,g)$ is a morphism. I don't see how it follows. I mean, it would seem reasonable if it did (it would be desirable if for any group object in any concrete category, translation was a morphism), but I don't think it's obvious.
                          $endgroup$
                          – tomasz
                          Mar 26 at 11:41
















                        2












                        $begingroup$

                        This is essentially rephrasing the other answer, but in a Category Theoretic perspective:



                        Let Top be the category of Topological Spaces and continuous maps. A group object in Top is a topological group, ie. a topological space equipped with continuous maps $m:Gtimes Grightarrow G$, $1:*rightarrow G$, and $(-)^-1:Grightarrow G$ expressing multiplication, identity, and inversion.



                        Since $Gtimes G$ is the product of topological spaces, it is equipped with continuous projections $pi_G:Gtimes Grightarrow G$ mapping $(g,h)mapsto g.$



                        Furthermore, a group G considered as a category is a category where the only object is the group $G$, and morphisms are left (or right - left is what's relevant here) multiplication by elements of $G$. These are isomorphisms since the coset $gG = G$.



                        Together, we have the desired result.






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$












                        • $begingroup$
                          I don't know category theory, but I love different perspectives! Thank you very much.
                          $endgroup$
                          – LBJFS
                          Mar 25 at 16:05










                        • $begingroup$
                          I'm not a category theorist, but I like to think that I'm fairly familiar with the basics. Yet I do not see how the facts you stated give the result. Could you elaborate?
                          $endgroup$
                          – tomasz
                          Mar 25 at 16:54










                        • $begingroup$
                          @tomasz I elaborated a bit. Hopefully this makes more sense.
                          $endgroup$
                          – user458276
                          Mar 25 at 23:11










                        • $begingroup$
                          I still don't see how it helps. You just added a bunch of defintions (all of which I've known before). The important point here is that the map $Gto G^2$, $gmapsto (a,g)$ is a morphism. I don't see how it follows. I mean, it would seem reasonable if it did (it would be desirable if for any group object in any concrete category, translation was a morphism), but I don't think it's obvious.
                          $endgroup$
                          – tomasz
                          Mar 26 at 11:41














                        2












                        2








                        2





                        $begingroup$

                        This is essentially rephrasing the other answer, but in a Category Theoretic perspective:



                        Let Top be the category of Topological Spaces and continuous maps. A group object in Top is a topological group, ie. a topological space equipped with continuous maps $m:Gtimes Grightarrow G$, $1:*rightarrow G$, and $(-)^-1:Grightarrow G$ expressing multiplication, identity, and inversion.



                        Since $Gtimes G$ is the product of topological spaces, it is equipped with continuous projections $pi_G:Gtimes Grightarrow G$ mapping $(g,h)mapsto g.$



                        Furthermore, a group G considered as a category is a category where the only object is the group $G$, and morphisms are left (or right - left is what's relevant here) multiplication by elements of $G$. These are isomorphisms since the coset $gG = G$.



                        Together, we have the desired result.






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$



                        This is essentially rephrasing the other answer, but in a Category Theoretic perspective:



                        Let Top be the category of Topological Spaces and continuous maps. A group object in Top is a topological group, ie. a topological space equipped with continuous maps $m:Gtimes Grightarrow G$, $1:*rightarrow G$, and $(-)^-1:Grightarrow G$ expressing multiplication, identity, and inversion.



                        Since $Gtimes G$ is the product of topological spaces, it is equipped with continuous projections $pi_G:Gtimes Grightarrow G$ mapping $(g,h)mapsto g.$



                        Furthermore, a group G considered as a category is a category where the only object is the group $G$, and morphisms are left (or right - left is what's relevant here) multiplication by elements of $G$. These are isomorphisms since the coset $gG = G$.



                        Together, we have the desired result.







                        share|cite|improve this answer














                        share|cite|improve this answer



                        share|cite|improve this answer








                        edited Mar 25 at 23:11

























                        answered Mar 25 at 16:01









                        user458276user458276

                        7801314




                        7801314











                        • $begingroup$
                          I don't know category theory, but I love different perspectives! Thank you very much.
                          $endgroup$
                          – LBJFS
                          Mar 25 at 16:05










                        • $begingroup$
                          I'm not a category theorist, but I like to think that I'm fairly familiar with the basics. Yet I do not see how the facts you stated give the result. Could you elaborate?
                          $endgroup$
                          – tomasz
                          Mar 25 at 16:54










                        • $begingroup$
                          @tomasz I elaborated a bit. Hopefully this makes more sense.
                          $endgroup$
                          – user458276
                          Mar 25 at 23:11










                        • $begingroup$
                          I still don't see how it helps. You just added a bunch of defintions (all of which I've known before). The important point here is that the map $Gto G^2$, $gmapsto (a,g)$ is a morphism. I don't see how it follows. I mean, it would seem reasonable if it did (it would be desirable if for any group object in any concrete category, translation was a morphism), but I don't think it's obvious.
                          $endgroup$
                          – tomasz
                          Mar 26 at 11:41

















                        • $begingroup$
                          I don't know category theory, but I love different perspectives! Thank you very much.
                          $endgroup$
                          – LBJFS
                          Mar 25 at 16:05










                        • $begingroup$
                          I'm not a category theorist, but I like to think that I'm fairly familiar with the basics. Yet I do not see how the facts you stated give the result. Could you elaborate?
                          $endgroup$
                          – tomasz
                          Mar 25 at 16:54










                        • $begingroup$
                          @tomasz I elaborated a bit. Hopefully this makes more sense.
                          $endgroup$
                          – user458276
                          Mar 25 at 23:11










                        • $begingroup$
                          I still don't see how it helps. You just added a bunch of defintions (all of which I've known before). The important point here is that the map $Gto G^2$, $gmapsto (a,g)$ is a morphism. I don't see how it follows. I mean, it would seem reasonable if it did (it would be desirable if for any group object in any concrete category, translation was a morphism), but I don't think it's obvious.
                          $endgroup$
                          – tomasz
                          Mar 26 at 11:41
















                        $begingroup$
                        I don't know category theory, but I love different perspectives! Thank you very much.
                        $endgroup$
                        – LBJFS
                        Mar 25 at 16:05




                        $begingroup$
                        I don't know category theory, but I love different perspectives! Thank you very much.
                        $endgroup$
                        – LBJFS
                        Mar 25 at 16:05












                        $begingroup$
                        I'm not a category theorist, but I like to think that I'm fairly familiar with the basics. Yet I do not see how the facts you stated give the result. Could you elaborate?
                        $endgroup$
                        – tomasz
                        Mar 25 at 16:54




                        $begingroup$
                        I'm not a category theorist, but I like to think that I'm fairly familiar with the basics. Yet I do not see how the facts you stated give the result. Could you elaborate?
                        $endgroup$
                        – tomasz
                        Mar 25 at 16:54












                        $begingroup$
                        @tomasz I elaborated a bit. Hopefully this makes more sense.
                        $endgroup$
                        – user458276
                        Mar 25 at 23:11




                        $begingroup$
                        @tomasz I elaborated a bit. Hopefully this makes more sense.
                        $endgroup$
                        – user458276
                        Mar 25 at 23:11












                        $begingroup$
                        I still don't see how it helps. You just added a bunch of defintions (all of which I've known before). The important point here is that the map $Gto G^2$, $gmapsto (a,g)$ is a morphism. I don't see how it follows. I mean, it would seem reasonable if it did (it would be desirable if for any group object in any concrete category, translation was a morphism), but I don't think it's obvious.
                        $endgroup$
                        – tomasz
                        Mar 26 at 11:41





                        $begingroup$
                        I still don't see how it helps. You just added a bunch of defintions (all of which I've known before). The important point here is that the map $Gto G^2$, $gmapsto (a,g)$ is a morphism. I don't see how it follows. I mean, it would seem reasonable if it did (it would be desirable if for any group object in any concrete category, translation was a morphism), but I don't think it's obvious.
                        $endgroup$
                        – tomasz
                        Mar 26 at 11:41












                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        Hint: if $fcolon Xtimes Yto Z$ is continuous, then it is also coordinatewise continous, i.e. for every $xin X$ and $yin Y$, the functions $f_xcolon Yto Z$, $ymapsto f(x,y)$ and $f_ycolon Xto Z$, $xmapsto f(x,y)$ are both continuous. This follows from the observation that if $Usubseteq Xtimes Y$ is open, then so are its cross-sections (which is immediate by the definition of the product topology).



                        Note that none of the implications mentioned in the preceding paragraph reverse. This is why in general, a semitopological group need not be topological (although there are some very powerful "automatic continuity" theorems for algebraic structures like groups).






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$

















                          1












                          $begingroup$

                          Hint: if $fcolon Xtimes Yto Z$ is continuous, then it is also coordinatewise continous, i.e. for every $xin X$ and $yin Y$, the functions $f_xcolon Yto Z$, $ymapsto f(x,y)$ and $f_ycolon Xto Z$, $xmapsto f(x,y)$ are both continuous. This follows from the observation that if $Usubseteq Xtimes Y$ is open, then so are its cross-sections (which is immediate by the definition of the product topology).



                          Note that none of the implications mentioned in the preceding paragraph reverse. This is why in general, a semitopological group need not be topological (although there are some very powerful "automatic continuity" theorems for algebraic structures like groups).






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$















                            1












                            1








                            1





                            $begingroup$

                            Hint: if $fcolon Xtimes Yto Z$ is continuous, then it is also coordinatewise continous, i.e. for every $xin X$ and $yin Y$, the functions $f_xcolon Yto Z$, $ymapsto f(x,y)$ and $f_ycolon Xto Z$, $xmapsto f(x,y)$ are both continuous. This follows from the observation that if $Usubseteq Xtimes Y$ is open, then so are its cross-sections (which is immediate by the definition of the product topology).



                            Note that none of the implications mentioned in the preceding paragraph reverse. This is why in general, a semitopological group need not be topological (although there are some very powerful "automatic continuity" theorems for algebraic structures like groups).






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            Hint: if $fcolon Xtimes Yto Z$ is continuous, then it is also coordinatewise continous, i.e. for every $xin X$ and $yin Y$, the functions $f_xcolon Yto Z$, $ymapsto f(x,y)$ and $f_ycolon Xto Z$, $xmapsto f(x,y)$ are both continuous. This follows from the observation that if $Usubseteq Xtimes Y$ is open, then so are its cross-sections (which is immediate by the definition of the product topology).



                            Note that none of the implications mentioned in the preceding paragraph reverse. This is why in general, a semitopological group need not be topological (although there are some very powerful "automatic continuity" theorems for algebraic structures like groups).







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Mar 25 at 16:48









                            tomasztomasz

                            24k23482




                            24k23482



























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded
















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3161917%2fleft-multiplication-is-homeomorphism-of-topological-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Adding axes to figuresAdding axes labels to LaTeX figuresLaTeX equivalent of ConTeXt buffersRotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?adding axes to shapesAlign axes across subfiguresAdding figures with a certain orderLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themAdding axes labels to LaTeX figures

                                Tähtien Talli Jäsenet | Lähteet | NavigointivalikkoSuomen Hippos – Tähtien Talli

                                Do these cracks on my tires look bad? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowDry rot tire should I replace?Having to replace tiresFishtailed so easily? Bad tires? ABS?Filling the tires with something other than air, to avoid puncture hassles?Used Michelin tires safe to install?Do these tyre cracks necessitate replacement?Rumbling noise: tires or mechanicalIs it possible to fix noisy feathered tires?Are bad winter tires still better than summer tires in winter?Torque converter failure - Related to replacing only 2 tires?Why use snow tires on all 4 wheels on 2-wheel-drive cars?