A case of the sniffles Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraCheckerboard Infection100 Prisoners' Names in BoxesThe First Interplanetary Arithmetic SummitFarm dimensionsMysterious Murder Mystery 5Ernie and the Pirates of the CaribbeanCan the policeman actually catch the thief, instead of shooting?The Cucumber ParadoxEspionage at the Chinese RestaurantErnie and the Case of the Singing SistersA man is trapped in a cage and wants to escape but doesn't, even when given the keys. Why?

Where did Arya get these scars?

France's Public Holidays' Puzzle

How do I handle milestones for levels?

What is the difference between Avadhuta and Jivanmukta?

What is the numbering system used for the DSN dishes?

Is it acceptable to use working hours to read general interest books?

TV series episode where humans nuke aliens before decrypting their message that states they come in peace

Trigonometric and Exponential Integration

How long can a nation maintain a technological edge over the rest of the world?

Is Bran literally the world's memory?

All ASCII characters with a given bit count

Contradiction:Maximum Power Transfer and High resistance of load

What is a 'Key' in computer science?

How can I make a line end at the edge of an irregular shape?

Could a cockatrice have parasitic embryos?

What is the evidence that custom checks in Northern Ireland are going to result in violence?

What to do with someone that cheated their way though university and a PhD program?

What is ls Largest Number Formed by only moving two sticks in 508?

PIC mathematical operations weird problem

Will I lose my paid in full property

Overhanging vertical bars in tabular

Is a self contained air-bullet cartridge feasible?

Using a map function on a 'Map' to change values

Why did Europeans not widely domesticate foxes?



A case of the sniffles



Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraCheckerboard Infection100 Prisoners' Names in BoxesThe First Interplanetary Arithmetic SummitFarm dimensionsMysterious Murder Mystery 5Ernie and the Pirates of the CaribbeanCan the policeman actually catch the thief, instead of shooting?The Cucumber ParadoxEspionage at the Chinese RestaurantErnie and the Case of the Singing SistersA man is trapped in a cage and wants to escape but doesn't, even when given the keys. Why?










8












$begingroup$


The cubicle farm



The cubicle farm at the Colla-R water treatment plant is laid out in a neat square: eight rows of eight cubicles with a narrow corridor between each cubicle (in the diagram the thin black lines are the corridors). Each cubicle is currently occupied by an employee, and no employees are on holiday.



The cubicles identified by being coloured red have ill employees in them: they have contracted some water-borne illness and are infectious. Due to the layout of the cubicles, a healthy employee only contracts the illness if they have two ill immediate neighbours in the four cardinal compass directions (you may take North to be pointing upwards relative to the page). For example, the cubicle at the end of the second row from the top contains an employee who is about to become ill. Ill employees do not go home, do not recover, are not allowed to leave their cubicle, but (luckily for them) do not die. As per company policy, the Colla-R HR department have now quarantined the cubicle farm, and no employee may leave until either everyone is ill, or everyone is well.



If, at the start of each hour, any healthy employee who has two ill neighbours as described becomes ill and immediately infectious, will all the employees fall ill? If not, what is the minimum number and location of ill employees that would ensure they do all fall ill? (The Colla-R HR department would of course like to avoid this happening.)










share|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    "no employee may leave until either everyone is ill, or everyone is well" - how would the latter be possible? You said ill employees do not recover.
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    Apr 5 at 16:33






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Randal'Thor and now you know something about the HR practices here....
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    Apr 5 at 16:34






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Randal'Thor less jokingly though, it's just to cover off all the edge cases
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    Apr 5 at 16:35






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Same second question.
    $endgroup$
    – noedne
    Apr 5 at 17:06















8












$begingroup$


The cubicle farm



The cubicle farm at the Colla-R water treatment plant is laid out in a neat square: eight rows of eight cubicles with a narrow corridor between each cubicle (in the diagram the thin black lines are the corridors). Each cubicle is currently occupied by an employee, and no employees are on holiday.



The cubicles identified by being coloured red have ill employees in them: they have contracted some water-borne illness and are infectious. Due to the layout of the cubicles, a healthy employee only contracts the illness if they have two ill immediate neighbours in the four cardinal compass directions (you may take North to be pointing upwards relative to the page). For example, the cubicle at the end of the second row from the top contains an employee who is about to become ill. Ill employees do not go home, do not recover, are not allowed to leave their cubicle, but (luckily for them) do not die. As per company policy, the Colla-R HR department have now quarantined the cubicle farm, and no employee may leave until either everyone is ill, or everyone is well.



If, at the start of each hour, any healthy employee who has two ill neighbours as described becomes ill and immediately infectious, will all the employees fall ill? If not, what is the minimum number and location of ill employees that would ensure they do all fall ill? (The Colla-R HR department would of course like to avoid this happening.)










share|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    "no employee may leave until either everyone is ill, or everyone is well" - how would the latter be possible? You said ill employees do not recover.
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    Apr 5 at 16:33






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Randal'Thor and now you know something about the HR practices here....
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    Apr 5 at 16:34






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Randal'Thor less jokingly though, it's just to cover off all the edge cases
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    Apr 5 at 16:35






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Same second question.
    $endgroup$
    – noedne
    Apr 5 at 17:06













8












8








8


1



$begingroup$


The cubicle farm



The cubicle farm at the Colla-R water treatment plant is laid out in a neat square: eight rows of eight cubicles with a narrow corridor between each cubicle (in the diagram the thin black lines are the corridors). Each cubicle is currently occupied by an employee, and no employees are on holiday.



The cubicles identified by being coloured red have ill employees in them: they have contracted some water-borne illness and are infectious. Due to the layout of the cubicles, a healthy employee only contracts the illness if they have two ill immediate neighbours in the four cardinal compass directions (you may take North to be pointing upwards relative to the page). For example, the cubicle at the end of the second row from the top contains an employee who is about to become ill. Ill employees do not go home, do not recover, are not allowed to leave their cubicle, but (luckily for them) do not die. As per company policy, the Colla-R HR department have now quarantined the cubicle farm, and no employee may leave until either everyone is ill, or everyone is well.



If, at the start of each hour, any healthy employee who has two ill neighbours as described becomes ill and immediately infectious, will all the employees fall ill? If not, what is the minimum number and location of ill employees that would ensure they do all fall ill? (The Colla-R HR department would of course like to avoid this happening.)










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




The cubicle farm



The cubicle farm at the Colla-R water treatment plant is laid out in a neat square: eight rows of eight cubicles with a narrow corridor between each cubicle (in the diagram the thin black lines are the corridors). Each cubicle is currently occupied by an employee, and no employees are on holiday.



The cubicles identified by being coloured red have ill employees in them: they have contracted some water-borne illness and are infectious. Due to the layout of the cubicles, a healthy employee only contracts the illness if they have two ill immediate neighbours in the four cardinal compass directions (you may take North to be pointing upwards relative to the page). For example, the cubicle at the end of the second row from the top contains an employee who is about to become ill. Ill employees do not go home, do not recover, are not allowed to leave their cubicle, but (luckily for them) do not die. As per company policy, the Colla-R HR department have now quarantined the cubicle farm, and no employee may leave until either everyone is ill, or everyone is well.



If, at the start of each hour, any healthy employee who has two ill neighbours as described becomes ill and immediately infectious, will all the employees fall ill? If not, what is the minimum number and location of ill employees that would ensure they do all fall ill? (The Colla-R HR department would of course like to avoid this happening.)







mathematics situation






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Apr 5 at 16:26









postmortespostmortes

520212




520212







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    "no employee may leave until either everyone is ill, or everyone is well" - how would the latter be possible? You said ill employees do not recover.
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    Apr 5 at 16:33






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Randal'Thor and now you know something about the HR practices here....
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    Apr 5 at 16:34






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Randal'Thor less jokingly though, it's just to cover off all the edge cases
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    Apr 5 at 16:35






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Same second question.
    $endgroup$
    – noedne
    Apr 5 at 17:06












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    "no employee may leave until either everyone is ill, or everyone is well" - how would the latter be possible? You said ill employees do not recover.
    $endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    Apr 5 at 16:33






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Randal'Thor and now you know something about the HR practices here....
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    Apr 5 at 16:34






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Randal'Thor less jokingly though, it's just to cover off all the edge cases
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    Apr 5 at 16:35






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Same second question.
    $endgroup$
    – noedne
    Apr 5 at 17:06







2




2




$begingroup$
"no employee may leave until either everyone is ill, or everyone is well" - how would the latter be possible? You said ill employees do not recover.
$endgroup$
– Rand al'Thor
Apr 5 at 16:33




$begingroup$
"no employee may leave until either everyone is ill, or everyone is well" - how would the latter be possible? You said ill employees do not recover.
$endgroup$
– Rand al'Thor
Apr 5 at 16:33




1




1




$begingroup$
@Randal'Thor and now you know something about the HR practices here....
$endgroup$
– postmortes
Apr 5 at 16:34




$begingroup$
@Randal'Thor and now you know something about the HR practices here....
$endgroup$
– postmortes
Apr 5 at 16:34




1




1




$begingroup$
@Randal'Thor less jokingly though, it's just to cover off all the edge cases
$endgroup$
– postmortes
Apr 5 at 16:35




$begingroup$
@Randal'Thor less jokingly though, it's just to cover off all the edge cases
$endgroup$
– postmortes
Apr 5 at 16:35




2




2




$begingroup$
Same second question.
$endgroup$
– noedne
Apr 5 at 17:06




$begingroup$
Same second question.
$endgroup$
– noedne
Apr 5 at 17:06










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















9












$begingroup$

Answer 1




No, they will not all fall ill. In particular, none of the employees in the top (or bottom) row will fall ill as they need to have at least one infected neighbour in the same row. Since none are ill in the beginning, none will become ill.




Suggestion for the minimum




If all of the cubicles on a diagonal have ill employees then everybody will eventually fall ill. So this gives an upper bound of 8 for the minimum.




Proof that this is the minimum




One important thing to notice is that the total perimeter of the ill area never increases (this is due to the fact that the two cubicle walls providing the infection get absorbed into the infected area in the next step producing, at most, two new cubicle walls to the infected perimeter).

Now, suppose there are just $7$ ill employees. Then, the total infected perimeter is at most $4 times 7 =28$. This can never increase, hence, the infection cannot cover all employees since the total perimeter is $32$.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Answer 1 is correct; if you can prove 8 as the minimum you get the tick :)
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    Apr 5 at 16:36











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81449%2fa-case-of-the-sniffles%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









9












$begingroup$

Answer 1




No, they will not all fall ill. In particular, none of the employees in the top (or bottom) row will fall ill as they need to have at least one infected neighbour in the same row. Since none are ill in the beginning, none will become ill.




Suggestion for the minimum




If all of the cubicles on a diagonal have ill employees then everybody will eventually fall ill. So this gives an upper bound of 8 for the minimum.




Proof that this is the minimum




One important thing to notice is that the total perimeter of the ill area never increases (this is due to the fact that the two cubicle walls providing the infection get absorbed into the infected area in the next step producing, at most, two new cubicle walls to the infected perimeter).

Now, suppose there are just $7$ ill employees. Then, the total infected perimeter is at most $4 times 7 =28$. This can never increase, hence, the infection cannot cover all employees since the total perimeter is $32$.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Answer 1 is correct; if you can prove 8 as the minimum you get the tick :)
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    Apr 5 at 16:36















9












$begingroup$

Answer 1




No, they will not all fall ill. In particular, none of the employees in the top (or bottom) row will fall ill as they need to have at least one infected neighbour in the same row. Since none are ill in the beginning, none will become ill.




Suggestion for the minimum




If all of the cubicles on a diagonal have ill employees then everybody will eventually fall ill. So this gives an upper bound of 8 for the minimum.




Proof that this is the minimum




One important thing to notice is that the total perimeter of the ill area never increases (this is due to the fact that the two cubicle walls providing the infection get absorbed into the infected area in the next step producing, at most, two new cubicle walls to the infected perimeter).

Now, suppose there are just $7$ ill employees. Then, the total infected perimeter is at most $4 times 7 =28$. This can never increase, hence, the infection cannot cover all employees since the total perimeter is $32$.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Answer 1 is correct; if you can prove 8 as the minimum you get the tick :)
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    Apr 5 at 16:36













9












9








9





$begingroup$

Answer 1




No, they will not all fall ill. In particular, none of the employees in the top (or bottom) row will fall ill as they need to have at least one infected neighbour in the same row. Since none are ill in the beginning, none will become ill.




Suggestion for the minimum




If all of the cubicles on a diagonal have ill employees then everybody will eventually fall ill. So this gives an upper bound of 8 for the minimum.




Proof that this is the minimum




One important thing to notice is that the total perimeter of the ill area never increases (this is due to the fact that the two cubicle walls providing the infection get absorbed into the infected area in the next step producing, at most, two new cubicle walls to the infected perimeter).

Now, suppose there are just $7$ ill employees. Then, the total infected perimeter is at most $4 times 7 =28$. This can never increase, hence, the infection cannot cover all employees since the total perimeter is $32$.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Answer 1




No, they will not all fall ill. In particular, none of the employees in the top (or bottom) row will fall ill as they need to have at least one infected neighbour in the same row. Since none are ill in the beginning, none will become ill.




Suggestion for the minimum




If all of the cubicles on a diagonal have ill employees then everybody will eventually fall ill. So this gives an upper bound of 8 for the minimum.




Proof that this is the minimum




One important thing to notice is that the total perimeter of the ill area never increases (this is due to the fact that the two cubicle walls providing the infection get absorbed into the infected area in the next step producing, at most, two new cubicle walls to the infected perimeter).

Now, suppose there are just $7$ ill employees. Then, the total infected perimeter is at most $4 times 7 =28$. This can never increase, hence, the infection cannot cover all employees since the total perimeter is $32$.








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Apr 5 at 17:02

























answered Apr 5 at 16:34









hexominohexomino

47.5k4143223




47.5k4143223







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Answer 1 is correct; if you can prove 8 as the minimum you get the tick :)
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    Apr 5 at 16:36












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Answer 1 is correct; if you can prove 8 as the minimum you get the tick :)
    $endgroup$
    – postmortes
    Apr 5 at 16:36







1




1




$begingroup$
Answer 1 is correct; if you can prove 8 as the minimum you get the tick :)
$endgroup$
– postmortes
Apr 5 at 16:36




$begingroup$
Answer 1 is correct; if you can prove 8 as the minimum you get the tick :)
$endgroup$
– postmortes
Apr 5 at 16:36

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81449%2fa-case-of-the-sniffles%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Quoting Keynes in a lectureIs differentiated instruction permitted by universities?How to make students learn prerequisitesUnsatisfactory Instructor Evaluations: balancing of expectations of engineering studentsWhat is the difference between a “statistician”, “applied statistician”, and an academic applying advanced stats within their field?Listing in reference section, but not quotingHow to efficiently use time while preparing for a class?Graduate Admissions: Teaching Emphasisstrategies for sharing teaching information with universities I don't personally have contacts withIs there an efficient way to give a large class of students feedback about their assignments?Is it unreasonable to expect students to read the lecture notes before attending the first class?

Rank groups within a grouped sequence of TRUE/FALSE and NAGrouping functions (tapply, by, aggregate) and the *apply familyCharacters counting and subletting specific patternsWhat is the purpose of setting a key in data.table?data.table vs dplyr: can one do something well the other can't or does poorly?how to make a bar plot for a list of dataframes?How to group by unique values in a list in RPandas - Alternative to rank() function that gives unique ordinal ranks for a columnRank within group in for loop in RData transformation: from dyadic to observational data in RGetting map from purrr to work with paste0

Are all passive ability checks floors for active ability checks?Does passive perception supersede active perception?Which skills can be used passively?Active Opposition with Free-Form Professions in Fate5E Trap/Ambush/Stealth Mechanics VS Passive Perception ConfusionInteraction between perception and stealth in obscured conditionsHow does Keen Sight affect Passive Perception?Are all d20 rolls either attacks, saves or ability checks?Can players declare that they are making a specific ability check?Can I see a Hidden creature that is not obscured at all?Can a Stealth check ever be made passively?Is this alternate version of the Observant feat balanced?What is the minimum amount of skill points per HD?