Were any external disk drives stacked vertically? Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraWhere can I find an external 8-inch floppy disk drive?Only “Drive A:” detected with two floppy disk drivesWhy did the Atari 8-bit computers make beeping noises while accessing the disk and cassette drives?Why were floppy drives not any faster?Disk drive long storage, with or without disk inside?Were external floppy drives for Atari ST and Amiga inter-compatible?Why do hard drives not use larger platter sizes anymore?What is the danger involved in trying to write already closed file with Commodore 1541 disk drive?Purpose of two disk drives on the Osborne 1Wider tower cases

Does Prince Arnaud cause someone holding the Princess to lose?

Does using the Inspiration rules for character defects encourage My Guy Syndrome?

Why do people think Winterfell crypts is the safest place for women, children and old people?

Has a Nobel Peace laureate ever been accused of war crimes?

How to keep bees out of canned beverages?

TV series episode where humans nuke aliens before decrypting their message that states they come in peace

How to translate "red flag" into Spanish?

Function on the set of limit countable ordinals

Bright yellow or light yellow?

Number of possible chess pairs where order and position matter

What were wait-states, and why was it only an issue for PCs?

Are `mathfont` and `mathspec` intended for same purpose?

How can I make a line end at the edge of an irregular shape?

What is the evidence that custom checks in Northern Ireland are going to result in violence?

Will I lose my paid in full property

How do I deal with an erroneously large refund?

Why aren't road bicycle wheels tiny?

Why does the Cisco show run command not show the full version, while the show version command does?

Philosophers who were composers?

Book with legacy programming code on a space ship that the main character hacks to escape

Suing a Police Officer Instead of the Police Department

What *exactly* is electrical current, voltage, and resistance?

"Working on a knee"

Are there existing rules/lore for MTG planeswalkers?



Were any external disk drives stacked vertically?



Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraWhere can I find an external 8-inch floppy disk drive?Only “Drive A:” detected with two floppy disk drivesWhy did the Atari 8-bit computers make beeping noises while accessing the disk and cassette drives?Why were floppy drives not any faster?Disk drive long storage, with or without disk inside?Were external floppy drives for Atari ST and Amiga inter-compatible?Why do hard drives not use larger platter sizes anymore?What is the danger involved in trying to write already closed file with Commodore 1541 disk drive?Purpose of two disk drives on the Osborne 1Wider tower cases










4















There was a time when floppy disk drives were big, expensive devices that in many cases, instead of being components of a computer, would be separate machines connected by a cable, in some cases with their own CPU. A well-known example was the Commodore 1541, which had a similar CPU to the Commodore 64.



I personally only ever had one external drive, but when you look at photographs of setups with two drives (very desirable if you could afford it), they are always side-by-side, taking up an awful lot of desk space. Even the CBM 4040 dual drive, places the drives side-by-side in a single very wide case.



It seems to me that since disk drives are fundamentally horizontal devices that want to be wide rather than tall, the obvious solution would be to stack them vertically. Maybe this would result in each drive picking up heat and vibration from the other one, but if this was tolerable when they were stacked vertically in a PC tower case, why not for external drives?



Were external disk drives ever stacked vertically? If not, why not?










share|improve this question

















  • 2





    Since there is no reason to prefer any orientation, this question asks for opinions about design, thus not realy OT at all.

    – Raffzahn
    Apr 4 at 15:35






  • 3





    @Raffzahn and here we agree ;) Any orientation is allowed on floppies except upside-down...

    – tofro
    Apr 4 at 16:33







  • 3





    @tofro, "Any orientation is allowed on floppies except upside-down" - And here, I will disagree, as upside-down is certainly a valid orientation for floppies. In fact, back in the day, I cut notches into quite a number of floppies so I could put them in upside-down and double my storage capacity.

    – Glen Yates
    Apr 4 at 21:03






  • 1





    Why not? Because racks are 19" wide :-)

    – another-dave
    Apr 4 at 22:19






  • 2





    @GlenYates I guess you turned the disk upside down and not the drive?

    – tofro
    Apr 5 at 8:57















4















There was a time when floppy disk drives were big, expensive devices that in many cases, instead of being components of a computer, would be separate machines connected by a cable, in some cases with their own CPU. A well-known example was the Commodore 1541, which had a similar CPU to the Commodore 64.



I personally only ever had one external drive, but when you look at photographs of setups with two drives (very desirable if you could afford it), they are always side-by-side, taking up an awful lot of desk space. Even the CBM 4040 dual drive, places the drives side-by-side in a single very wide case.



It seems to me that since disk drives are fundamentally horizontal devices that want to be wide rather than tall, the obvious solution would be to stack them vertically. Maybe this would result in each drive picking up heat and vibration from the other one, but if this was tolerable when they were stacked vertically in a PC tower case, why not for external drives?



Were external disk drives ever stacked vertically? If not, why not?










share|improve this question

















  • 2





    Since there is no reason to prefer any orientation, this question asks for opinions about design, thus not realy OT at all.

    – Raffzahn
    Apr 4 at 15:35






  • 3





    @Raffzahn and here we agree ;) Any orientation is allowed on floppies except upside-down...

    – tofro
    Apr 4 at 16:33







  • 3





    @tofro, "Any orientation is allowed on floppies except upside-down" - And here, I will disagree, as upside-down is certainly a valid orientation for floppies. In fact, back in the day, I cut notches into quite a number of floppies so I could put them in upside-down and double my storage capacity.

    – Glen Yates
    Apr 4 at 21:03






  • 1





    Why not? Because racks are 19" wide :-)

    – another-dave
    Apr 4 at 22:19






  • 2





    @GlenYates I guess you turned the disk upside down and not the drive?

    – tofro
    Apr 5 at 8:57













4












4








4








There was a time when floppy disk drives were big, expensive devices that in many cases, instead of being components of a computer, would be separate machines connected by a cable, in some cases with their own CPU. A well-known example was the Commodore 1541, which had a similar CPU to the Commodore 64.



I personally only ever had one external drive, but when you look at photographs of setups with two drives (very desirable if you could afford it), they are always side-by-side, taking up an awful lot of desk space. Even the CBM 4040 dual drive, places the drives side-by-side in a single very wide case.



It seems to me that since disk drives are fundamentally horizontal devices that want to be wide rather than tall, the obvious solution would be to stack them vertically. Maybe this would result in each drive picking up heat and vibration from the other one, but if this was tolerable when they were stacked vertically in a PC tower case, why not for external drives?



Were external disk drives ever stacked vertically? If not, why not?










share|improve this question














There was a time when floppy disk drives were big, expensive devices that in many cases, instead of being components of a computer, would be separate machines connected by a cable, in some cases with their own CPU. A well-known example was the Commodore 1541, which had a similar CPU to the Commodore 64.



I personally only ever had one external drive, but when you look at photographs of setups with two drives (very desirable if you could afford it), they are always side-by-side, taking up an awful lot of desk space. Even the CBM 4040 dual drive, places the drives side-by-side in a single very wide case.



It seems to me that since disk drives are fundamentally horizontal devices that want to be wide rather than tall, the obvious solution would be to stack them vertically. Maybe this would result in each drive picking up heat and vibration from the other one, but if this was tolerable when they were stacked vertically in a PC tower case, why not for external drives?



Were external disk drives ever stacked vertically? If not, why not?







hardware floppy-disk disk-drive






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Apr 4 at 13:26









rwallacerwallace

11.5k559170




11.5k559170







  • 2





    Since there is no reason to prefer any orientation, this question asks for opinions about design, thus not realy OT at all.

    – Raffzahn
    Apr 4 at 15:35






  • 3





    @Raffzahn and here we agree ;) Any orientation is allowed on floppies except upside-down...

    – tofro
    Apr 4 at 16:33







  • 3





    @tofro, "Any orientation is allowed on floppies except upside-down" - And here, I will disagree, as upside-down is certainly a valid orientation for floppies. In fact, back in the day, I cut notches into quite a number of floppies so I could put them in upside-down and double my storage capacity.

    – Glen Yates
    Apr 4 at 21:03






  • 1





    Why not? Because racks are 19" wide :-)

    – another-dave
    Apr 4 at 22:19






  • 2





    @GlenYates I guess you turned the disk upside down and not the drive?

    – tofro
    Apr 5 at 8:57












  • 2





    Since there is no reason to prefer any orientation, this question asks for opinions about design, thus not realy OT at all.

    – Raffzahn
    Apr 4 at 15:35






  • 3





    @Raffzahn and here we agree ;) Any orientation is allowed on floppies except upside-down...

    – tofro
    Apr 4 at 16:33







  • 3





    @tofro, "Any orientation is allowed on floppies except upside-down" - And here, I will disagree, as upside-down is certainly a valid orientation for floppies. In fact, back in the day, I cut notches into quite a number of floppies so I could put them in upside-down and double my storage capacity.

    – Glen Yates
    Apr 4 at 21:03






  • 1





    Why not? Because racks are 19" wide :-)

    – another-dave
    Apr 4 at 22:19






  • 2





    @GlenYates I guess you turned the disk upside down and not the drive?

    – tofro
    Apr 5 at 8:57







2




2





Since there is no reason to prefer any orientation, this question asks for opinions about design, thus not realy OT at all.

– Raffzahn
Apr 4 at 15:35





Since there is no reason to prefer any orientation, this question asks for opinions about design, thus not realy OT at all.

– Raffzahn
Apr 4 at 15:35




3




3





@Raffzahn and here we agree ;) Any orientation is allowed on floppies except upside-down...

– tofro
Apr 4 at 16:33






@Raffzahn and here we agree ;) Any orientation is allowed on floppies except upside-down...

– tofro
Apr 4 at 16:33





3




3





@tofro, "Any orientation is allowed on floppies except upside-down" - And here, I will disagree, as upside-down is certainly a valid orientation for floppies. In fact, back in the day, I cut notches into quite a number of floppies so I could put them in upside-down and double my storage capacity.

– Glen Yates
Apr 4 at 21:03





@tofro, "Any orientation is allowed on floppies except upside-down" - And here, I will disagree, as upside-down is certainly a valid orientation for floppies. In fact, back in the day, I cut notches into quite a number of floppies so I could put them in upside-down and double my storage capacity.

– Glen Yates
Apr 4 at 21:03




1




1





Why not? Because racks are 19" wide :-)

– another-dave
Apr 4 at 22:19





Why not? Because racks are 19" wide :-)

– another-dave
Apr 4 at 22:19




2




2





@GlenYates I guess you turned the disk upside down and not the drive?

– tofro
Apr 5 at 8:57





@GlenYates I guess you turned the disk upside down and not the drive?

– tofro
Apr 5 at 8:57










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















13















It seems to me that since disk drives are fundamentally horizontal devices that want to be wide rather than tall,




To me they are taller than wide. After all, that's as well the orientation IBM did put the very first drive, so anything else is plain wrong, isn't it :))




the obvious solution would be to stack them vertically.




That's pure opinion and up to the designer how he imagines a drive to look best or fit best. The drives itself work in any orientation with any angle equally well.




It seems to me that since disk drives are fundamentally horizontal devices




As said before, they are not, they work in any orientation. At least as long as we talk about the technology. If at all, any orientation can come from ball bearing involved. Except, for simple low speed application next to any standard bearing will offer the needed support strength - if that drive has one at all.




Were external disk drives ever stacked vertically?




It has been used in any kombination you may thing of.



  • Horizontal side by side like in a DEC RX01/02 - as that will need less HE in a rack

enter image description here



  • Horizontal above each other like the Atari 815

enter image description here



  • Vertical side by side like IBM's 6330 8" drive

enter image description here



  • Vertical above each other (Again DEC computers)

(Still looking for the right picture)



  • Or even both like with a Heathkit H17 case where two dives were mounted horizontal side by side, but when a third drive got added they where turned vertical to fit the case.

enter image description hereenter image description here



  • Heck, they where even Computers mouting them both way at the same time:

enter image description here



  • And then there was the DEC RX-50 dual drive, used in PCs to be placed either as desktop (with the drive horizontal) or tower (now vertical), whatever fits the desk.

enter image description here



enter image description hereenter image description here






share|improve this answer




















  • 2





    I'm disappointed to see that you've not included any examples of them being oriented vertically and then stacked on top of each other

    – Valorum
    Apr 4 at 22:54







  • 4





    @Valorum I'm so sorry, there is a DEC machine doing exactly this, but I couldn't find any worthwhile picture so far. Shame on me.

    – Raffzahn
    Apr 4 at 23:01






  • 1





    The Vobis one designed by Colani still makes me uncomfortable

    – Lars Beck
    Apr 5 at 7:27






  • 1





    @Valorum, Those last two computers (they look like Rainbow 100A to me); the ones pictured are fitted with a hard drive and a dual floppy, but could be fitted instead with two dual floppy drives (i.e. four floppy drives) stacked in the same configuration you mention.

    – Wilson
    Apr 5 at 7:44






  • 2





    @Valorum This case albeit relatively modern, and for internal drives, has three drives, vertically orientated, mounted atop one another!

    – TripeHound
    Apr 5 at 12:37


















11














Yes; this was standard procedure for at least the BBC Micro:



enter image description here



Including for third-party drives:



enter image description here



Presumably because two drives arranged that way were only just taller than the machine itself:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer


















  • 2





    To my mind, the initial reason for stacking two half-height 5 1/4" drives on top of one another like that was because they take up the same space as a single full-height drive. Compare the BBC-branded AND02 twin half-height drives in your third photo with the AND-01 single full-height drive pictured at chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/8bit_Upgrades/… . They appear to have used the exact same outer casing for both models.

    – Kaz
    Apr 4 at 17:31






  • 2





    Though it should also be noted that some drive sets for the BBC Micros put the drives side-by side, see chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/Computers/Master512.html and chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/Computers/BBCBI3.html

    – Kaz
    Apr 4 at 17:35


















6














  1. I don't think your claim that never happened is generally true

  2. It makes a lot of sense to put drives side by side when you want to place the drive set between computer and CRT (like many Apple users did). That wouldn't work well with stacks.

  3. Especially twin 3 1/2" drives were very often sold as vertical stacks. But some vendors also did the same with the larger drive sets

  4. If you look at earlier drives, 2 x 5 1/4 full-height drives stacked on top of the other really would be awkward to handle (but, see here) - that simply looks clunky.

Other than that, I don't see a technical reason why you wouldn't want to stack drives on top of the others. The frames of 5 1/4 drives are mostly aluminium castings, so stable enough to stack, and heat really shouldn't be a problem with floppy drives.



German Wikipedia seems to know how to stack Commodore 4040 drives as well. You simply need to have enough of them ;)






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    "Heat really shouldn't be a problem with floppy drives." That's true but the power supply generates heat.

    – snips-n-snails
    Apr 4 at 18:36






  • 1





    @traal but you won't stack the power supply?

    – tofro
    Apr 4 at 18:38











  • On the top or the bottom? Passive or active cooling?

    – snips-n-snails
    Apr 4 at 18:53


















5














One configuration I think Raffzahn missed so far was two independent drives stacked on top of each other. That was the recommended method for multiple Amstrad 3" drives:
amstrad cpc464



(Image source: Gallery - Category: CPC464 - Image: CPC464 (b) setup - Roland in the caves)






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    Common for CBM PET drives I can remember having a stack 3 or 4 high of the various drives.

    – Neuromancer
    2 days ago


















4














In the TRS-80 Model I and Model II ecosystems, floppy drives normally had the disk oriented vertically. This made the drives "tall rather than wide", and placing multiple drives side-by-side worked well.
enter image description here



In the Model III, two horizontal drives were stacked vertically in the main housing, to the right of the CRT (and above the numeric keypad).



Model III






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    While interesting, this is not really an answer to the question

    – tofro
    Apr 7 at 7:29


















2














Yes, of course external disk drives were often stacked. The LaCie 'Joule' external
disk tower was a vertical stack/rack for drive modules,depicted here and many
external disk cases were given interlocking features (feet or molded plastic
shapes that would keep a stacked unit from sliding off).






share|improve this answer























  • those don't seem to be floppies, though.

    – scruss
    Apr 8 at 15:54











  • Until USB came along, no Mac supported multiple externals except SCSI (usually hard disks, optical, or super-floppy); there was only a connector for a single floppy external, so no stacking issue there.

    – Whit3rd
    Apr 8 at 21:29











  • the question wasn't limited to Macs, though

    – scruss
    Apr 8 at 22:24






  • 1





    @scruss The answer isn't limited to Macs, either; SCSI allowed a half dozen externals, or more, on any suitably equipped computers; SGI, DEC, Sun, IBM, all had SCSI externals.

    – Whit3rd
    Apr 9 at 6:01












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "648"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fretrocomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9569%2fwere-any-external-disk-drives-stacked-vertically%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes








6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









13















It seems to me that since disk drives are fundamentally horizontal devices that want to be wide rather than tall,




To me they are taller than wide. After all, that's as well the orientation IBM did put the very first drive, so anything else is plain wrong, isn't it :))




the obvious solution would be to stack them vertically.




That's pure opinion and up to the designer how he imagines a drive to look best or fit best. The drives itself work in any orientation with any angle equally well.




It seems to me that since disk drives are fundamentally horizontal devices




As said before, they are not, they work in any orientation. At least as long as we talk about the technology. If at all, any orientation can come from ball bearing involved. Except, for simple low speed application next to any standard bearing will offer the needed support strength - if that drive has one at all.




Were external disk drives ever stacked vertically?




It has been used in any kombination you may thing of.



  • Horizontal side by side like in a DEC RX01/02 - as that will need less HE in a rack

enter image description here



  • Horizontal above each other like the Atari 815

enter image description here



  • Vertical side by side like IBM's 6330 8" drive

enter image description here



  • Vertical above each other (Again DEC computers)

(Still looking for the right picture)



  • Or even both like with a Heathkit H17 case where two dives were mounted horizontal side by side, but when a third drive got added they where turned vertical to fit the case.

enter image description hereenter image description here



  • Heck, they where even Computers mouting them both way at the same time:

enter image description here



  • And then there was the DEC RX-50 dual drive, used in PCs to be placed either as desktop (with the drive horizontal) or tower (now vertical), whatever fits the desk.

enter image description here



enter image description hereenter image description here






share|improve this answer




















  • 2





    I'm disappointed to see that you've not included any examples of them being oriented vertically and then stacked on top of each other

    – Valorum
    Apr 4 at 22:54







  • 4





    @Valorum I'm so sorry, there is a DEC machine doing exactly this, but I couldn't find any worthwhile picture so far. Shame on me.

    – Raffzahn
    Apr 4 at 23:01






  • 1





    The Vobis one designed by Colani still makes me uncomfortable

    – Lars Beck
    Apr 5 at 7:27






  • 1





    @Valorum, Those last two computers (they look like Rainbow 100A to me); the ones pictured are fitted with a hard drive and a dual floppy, but could be fitted instead with two dual floppy drives (i.e. four floppy drives) stacked in the same configuration you mention.

    – Wilson
    Apr 5 at 7:44






  • 2





    @Valorum This case albeit relatively modern, and for internal drives, has three drives, vertically orientated, mounted atop one another!

    – TripeHound
    Apr 5 at 12:37















13















It seems to me that since disk drives are fundamentally horizontal devices that want to be wide rather than tall,




To me they are taller than wide. After all, that's as well the orientation IBM did put the very first drive, so anything else is plain wrong, isn't it :))




the obvious solution would be to stack them vertically.




That's pure opinion and up to the designer how he imagines a drive to look best or fit best. The drives itself work in any orientation with any angle equally well.




It seems to me that since disk drives are fundamentally horizontal devices




As said before, they are not, they work in any orientation. At least as long as we talk about the technology. If at all, any orientation can come from ball bearing involved. Except, for simple low speed application next to any standard bearing will offer the needed support strength - if that drive has one at all.




Were external disk drives ever stacked vertically?




It has been used in any kombination you may thing of.



  • Horizontal side by side like in a DEC RX01/02 - as that will need less HE in a rack

enter image description here



  • Horizontal above each other like the Atari 815

enter image description here



  • Vertical side by side like IBM's 6330 8" drive

enter image description here



  • Vertical above each other (Again DEC computers)

(Still looking for the right picture)



  • Or even both like with a Heathkit H17 case where two dives were mounted horizontal side by side, but when a third drive got added they where turned vertical to fit the case.

enter image description hereenter image description here



  • Heck, they where even Computers mouting them both way at the same time:

enter image description here



  • And then there was the DEC RX-50 dual drive, used in PCs to be placed either as desktop (with the drive horizontal) or tower (now vertical), whatever fits the desk.

enter image description here



enter image description hereenter image description here






share|improve this answer




















  • 2





    I'm disappointed to see that you've not included any examples of them being oriented vertically and then stacked on top of each other

    – Valorum
    Apr 4 at 22:54







  • 4





    @Valorum I'm so sorry, there is a DEC machine doing exactly this, but I couldn't find any worthwhile picture so far. Shame on me.

    – Raffzahn
    Apr 4 at 23:01






  • 1





    The Vobis one designed by Colani still makes me uncomfortable

    – Lars Beck
    Apr 5 at 7:27






  • 1





    @Valorum, Those last two computers (they look like Rainbow 100A to me); the ones pictured are fitted with a hard drive and a dual floppy, but could be fitted instead with two dual floppy drives (i.e. four floppy drives) stacked in the same configuration you mention.

    – Wilson
    Apr 5 at 7:44






  • 2





    @Valorum This case albeit relatively modern, and for internal drives, has three drives, vertically orientated, mounted atop one another!

    – TripeHound
    Apr 5 at 12:37













13












13








13








It seems to me that since disk drives are fundamentally horizontal devices that want to be wide rather than tall,




To me they are taller than wide. After all, that's as well the orientation IBM did put the very first drive, so anything else is plain wrong, isn't it :))




the obvious solution would be to stack them vertically.




That's pure opinion and up to the designer how he imagines a drive to look best or fit best. The drives itself work in any orientation with any angle equally well.




It seems to me that since disk drives are fundamentally horizontal devices




As said before, they are not, they work in any orientation. At least as long as we talk about the technology. If at all, any orientation can come from ball bearing involved. Except, for simple low speed application next to any standard bearing will offer the needed support strength - if that drive has one at all.




Were external disk drives ever stacked vertically?




It has been used in any kombination you may thing of.



  • Horizontal side by side like in a DEC RX01/02 - as that will need less HE in a rack

enter image description here



  • Horizontal above each other like the Atari 815

enter image description here



  • Vertical side by side like IBM's 6330 8" drive

enter image description here



  • Vertical above each other (Again DEC computers)

(Still looking for the right picture)



  • Or even both like with a Heathkit H17 case where two dives were mounted horizontal side by side, but when a third drive got added they where turned vertical to fit the case.

enter image description hereenter image description here



  • Heck, they where even Computers mouting them both way at the same time:

enter image description here



  • And then there was the DEC RX-50 dual drive, used in PCs to be placed either as desktop (with the drive horizontal) or tower (now vertical), whatever fits the desk.

enter image description here



enter image description hereenter image description here






share|improve this answer
















It seems to me that since disk drives are fundamentally horizontal devices that want to be wide rather than tall,




To me they are taller than wide. After all, that's as well the orientation IBM did put the very first drive, so anything else is plain wrong, isn't it :))




the obvious solution would be to stack them vertically.




That's pure opinion and up to the designer how he imagines a drive to look best or fit best. The drives itself work in any orientation with any angle equally well.




It seems to me that since disk drives are fundamentally horizontal devices




As said before, they are not, they work in any orientation. At least as long as we talk about the technology. If at all, any orientation can come from ball bearing involved. Except, for simple low speed application next to any standard bearing will offer the needed support strength - if that drive has one at all.




Were external disk drives ever stacked vertically?




It has been used in any kombination you may thing of.



  • Horizontal side by side like in a DEC RX01/02 - as that will need less HE in a rack

enter image description here



  • Horizontal above each other like the Atari 815

enter image description here



  • Vertical side by side like IBM's 6330 8" drive

enter image description here



  • Vertical above each other (Again DEC computers)

(Still looking for the right picture)



  • Or even both like with a Heathkit H17 case where two dives were mounted horizontal side by side, but when a third drive got added they where turned vertical to fit the case.

enter image description hereenter image description here



  • Heck, they where even Computers mouting them both way at the same time:

enter image description here



  • And then there was the DEC RX-50 dual drive, used in PCs to be placed either as desktop (with the drive horizontal) or tower (now vertical), whatever fits the desk.

enter image description here



enter image description hereenter image description here







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Apr 4 at 23:14

























answered Apr 4 at 17:08









RaffzahnRaffzahn

57.3k6140234




57.3k6140234







  • 2





    I'm disappointed to see that you've not included any examples of them being oriented vertically and then stacked on top of each other

    – Valorum
    Apr 4 at 22:54







  • 4





    @Valorum I'm so sorry, there is a DEC machine doing exactly this, but I couldn't find any worthwhile picture so far. Shame on me.

    – Raffzahn
    Apr 4 at 23:01






  • 1





    The Vobis one designed by Colani still makes me uncomfortable

    – Lars Beck
    Apr 5 at 7:27






  • 1





    @Valorum, Those last two computers (they look like Rainbow 100A to me); the ones pictured are fitted with a hard drive and a dual floppy, but could be fitted instead with two dual floppy drives (i.e. four floppy drives) stacked in the same configuration you mention.

    – Wilson
    Apr 5 at 7:44






  • 2





    @Valorum This case albeit relatively modern, and for internal drives, has three drives, vertically orientated, mounted atop one another!

    – TripeHound
    Apr 5 at 12:37












  • 2





    I'm disappointed to see that you've not included any examples of them being oriented vertically and then stacked on top of each other

    – Valorum
    Apr 4 at 22:54







  • 4





    @Valorum I'm so sorry, there is a DEC machine doing exactly this, but I couldn't find any worthwhile picture so far. Shame on me.

    – Raffzahn
    Apr 4 at 23:01






  • 1





    The Vobis one designed by Colani still makes me uncomfortable

    – Lars Beck
    Apr 5 at 7:27






  • 1





    @Valorum, Those last two computers (they look like Rainbow 100A to me); the ones pictured are fitted with a hard drive and a dual floppy, but could be fitted instead with two dual floppy drives (i.e. four floppy drives) stacked in the same configuration you mention.

    – Wilson
    Apr 5 at 7:44






  • 2





    @Valorum This case albeit relatively modern, and for internal drives, has three drives, vertically orientated, mounted atop one another!

    – TripeHound
    Apr 5 at 12:37







2




2





I'm disappointed to see that you've not included any examples of them being oriented vertically and then stacked on top of each other

– Valorum
Apr 4 at 22:54






I'm disappointed to see that you've not included any examples of them being oriented vertically and then stacked on top of each other

– Valorum
Apr 4 at 22:54





4




4





@Valorum I'm so sorry, there is a DEC machine doing exactly this, but I couldn't find any worthwhile picture so far. Shame on me.

– Raffzahn
Apr 4 at 23:01





@Valorum I'm so sorry, there is a DEC machine doing exactly this, but I couldn't find any worthwhile picture so far. Shame on me.

– Raffzahn
Apr 4 at 23:01




1




1





The Vobis one designed by Colani still makes me uncomfortable

– Lars Beck
Apr 5 at 7:27





The Vobis one designed by Colani still makes me uncomfortable

– Lars Beck
Apr 5 at 7:27




1




1





@Valorum, Those last two computers (they look like Rainbow 100A to me); the ones pictured are fitted with a hard drive and a dual floppy, but could be fitted instead with two dual floppy drives (i.e. four floppy drives) stacked in the same configuration you mention.

– Wilson
Apr 5 at 7:44





@Valorum, Those last two computers (they look like Rainbow 100A to me); the ones pictured are fitted with a hard drive and a dual floppy, but could be fitted instead with two dual floppy drives (i.e. four floppy drives) stacked in the same configuration you mention.

– Wilson
Apr 5 at 7:44




2




2





@Valorum This case albeit relatively modern, and for internal drives, has three drives, vertically orientated, mounted atop one another!

– TripeHound
Apr 5 at 12:37





@Valorum This case albeit relatively modern, and for internal drives, has three drives, vertically orientated, mounted atop one another!

– TripeHound
Apr 5 at 12:37











11














Yes; this was standard procedure for at least the BBC Micro:



enter image description here



Including for third-party drives:



enter image description here



Presumably because two drives arranged that way were only just taller than the machine itself:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer


















  • 2





    To my mind, the initial reason for stacking two half-height 5 1/4" drives on top of one another like that was because they take up the same space as a single full-height drive. Compare the BBC-branded AND02 twin half-height drives in your third photo with the AND-01 single full-height drive pictured at chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/8bit_Upgrades/… . They appear to have used the exact same outer casing for both models.

    – Kaz
    Apr 4 at 17:31






  • 2





    Though it should also be noted that some drive sets for the BBC Micros put the drives side-by side, see chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/Computers/Master512.html and chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/Computers/BBCBI3.html

    – Kaz
    Apr 4 at 17:35















11














Yes; this was standard procedure for at least the BBC Micro:



enter image description here



Including for third-party drives:



enter image description here



Presumably because two drives arranged that way were only just taller than the machine itself:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer


















  • 2





    To my mind, the initial reason for stacking two half-height 5 1/4" drives on top of one another like that was because they take up the same space as a single full-height drive. Compare the BBC-branded AND02 twin half-height drives in your third photo with the AND-01 single full-height drive pictured at chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/8bit_Upgrades/… . They appear to have used the exact same outer casing for both models.

    – Kaz
    Apr 4 at 17:31






  • 2





    Though it should also be noted that some drive sets for the BBC Micros put the drives side-by side, see chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/Computers/Master512.html and chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/Computers/BBCBI3.html

    – Kaz
    Apr 4 at 17:35













11












11








11







Yes; this was standard procedure for at least the BBC Micro:



enter image description here



Including for third-party drives:



enter image description here



Presumably because two drives arranged that way were only just taller than the machine itself:



enter image description here






share|improve this answer













Yes; this was standard procedure for at least the BBC Micro:



enter image description here



Including for third-party drives:



enter image description here



Presumably because two drives arranged that way were only just taller than the machine itself:



enter image description here







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Apr 4 at 15:31









TommyTommy

16.5k14782




16.5k14782







  • 2





    To my mind, the initial reason for stacking two half-height 5 1/4" drives on top of one another like that was because they take up the same space as a single full-height drive. Compare the BBC-branded AND02 twin half-height drives in your third photo with the AND-01 single full-height drive pictured at chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/8bit_Upgrades/… . They appear to have used the exact same outer casing for both models.

    – Kaz
    Apr 4 at 17:31






  • 2





    Though it should also be noted that some drive sets for the BBC Micros put the drives side-by side, see chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/Computers/Master512.html and chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/Computers/BBCBI3.html

    – Kaz
    Apr 4 at 17:35












  • 2





    To my mind, the initial reason for stacking two half-height 5 1/4" drives on top of one another like that was because they take up the same space as a single full-height drive. Compare the BBC-branded AND02 twin half-height drives in your third photo with the AND-01 single full-height drive pictured at chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/8bit_Upgrades/… . They appear to have used the exact same outer casing for both models.

    – Kaz
    Apr 4 at 17:31






  • 2





    Though it should also be noted that some drive sets for the BBC Micros put the drives side-by side, see chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/Computers/Master512.html and chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/Computers/BBCBI3.html

    – Kaz
    Apr 4 at 17:35







2




2





To my mind, the initial reason for stacking two half-height 5 1/4" drives on top of one another like that was because they take up the same space as a single full-height drive. Compare the BBC-branded AND02 twin half-height drives in your third photo with the AND-01 single full-height drive pictured at chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/8bit_Upgrades/… . They appear to have used the exact same outer casing for both models.

– Kaz
Apr 4 at 17:31





To my mind, the initial reason for stacking two half-height 5 1/4" drives on top of one another like that was because they take up the same space as a single full-height drive. Compare the BBC-branded AND02 twin half-height drives in your third photo with the AND-01 single full-height drive pictured at chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/8bit_Upgrades/… . They appear to have used the exact same outer casing for both models.

– Kaz
Apr 4 at 17:31




2




2





Though it should also be noted that some drive sets for the BBC Micros put the drives side-by side, see chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/Computers/Master512.html and chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/Computers/BBCBI3.html

– Kaz
Apr 4 at 17:35





Though it should also be noted that some drive sets for the BBC Micros put the drives side-by side, see chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/Computers/Master512.html and chrisacorns.computinghistory.org.uk/Computers/BBCBI3.html

– Kaz
Apr 4 at 17:35











6














  1. I don't think your claim that never happened is generally true

  2. It makes a lot of sense to put drives side by side when you want to place the drive set between computer and CRT (like many Apple users did). That wouldn't work well with stacks.

  3. Especially twin 3 1/2" drives were very often sold as vertical stacks. But some vendors also did the same with the larger drive sets

  4. If you look at earlier drives, 2 x 5 1/4 full-height drives stacked on top of the other really would be awkward to handle (but, see here) - that simply looks clunky.

Other than that, I don't see a technical reason why you wouldn't want to stack drives on top of the others. The frames of 5 1/4 drives are mostly aluminium castings, so stable enough to stack, and heat really shouldn't be a problem with floppy drives.



German Wikipedia seems to know how to stack Commodore 4040 drives as well. You simply need to have enough of them ;)






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    "Heat really shouldn't be a problem with floppy drives." That's true but the power supply generates heat.

    – snips-n-snails
    Apr 4 at 18:36






  • 1





    @traal but you won't stack the power supply?

    – tofro
    Apr 4 at 18:38











  • On the top or the bottom? Passive or active cooling?

    – snips-n-snails
    Apr 4 at 18:53















6














  1. I don't think your claim that never happened is generally true

  2. It makes a lot of sense to put drives side by side when you want to place the drive set between computer and CRT (like many Apple users did). That wouldn't work well with stacks.

  3. Especially twin 3 1/2" drives were very often sold as vertical stacks. But some vendors also did the same with the larger drive sets

  4. If you look at earlier drives, 2 x 5 1/4 full-height drives stacked on top of the other really would be awkward to handle (but, see here) - that simply looks clunky.

Other than that, I don't see a technical reason why you wouldn't want to stack drives on top of the others. The frames of 5 1/4 drives are mostly aluminium castings, so stable enough to stack, and heat really shouldn't be a problem with floppy drives.



German Wikipedia seems to know how to stack Commodore 4040 drives as well. You simply need to have enough of them ;)






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    "Heat really shouldn't be a problem with floppy drives." That's true but the power supply generates heat.

    – snips-n-snails
    Apr 4 at 18:36






  • 1





    @traal but you won't stack the power supply?

    – tofro
    Apr 4 at 18:38











  • On the top or the bottom? Passive or active cooling?

    – snips-n-snails
    Apr 4 at 18:53













6












6








6







  1. I don't think your claim that never happened is generally true

  2. It makes a lot of sense to put drives side by side when you want to place the drive set between computer and CRT (like many Apple users did). That wouldn't work well with stacks.

  3. Especially twin 3 1/2" drives were very often sold as vertical stacks. But some vendors also did the same with the larger drive sets

  4. If you look at earlier drives, 2 x 5 1/4 full-height drives stacked on top of the other really would be awkward to handle (but, see here) - that simply looks clunky.

Other than that, I don't see a technical reason why you wouldn't want to stack drives on top of the others. The frames of 5 1/4 drives are mostly aluminium castings, so stable enough to stack, and heat really shouldn't be a problem with floppy drives.



German Wikipedia seems to know how to stack Commodore 4040 drives as well. You simply need to have enough of them ;)






share|improve this answer















  1. I don't think your claim that never happened is generally true

  2. It makes a lot of sense to put drives side by side when you want to place the drive set between computer and CRT (like many Apple users did). That wouldn't work well with stacks.

  3. Especially twin 3 1/2" drives were very often sold as vertical stacks. But some vendors also did the same with the larger drive sets

  4. If you look at earlier drives, 2 x 5 1/4 full-height drives stacked on top of the other really would be awkward to handle (but, see here) - that simply looks clunky.

Other than that, I don't see a technical reason why you wouldn't want to stack drives on top of the others. The frames of 5 1/4 drives are mostly aluminium castings, so stable enough to stack, and heat really shouldn't be a problem with floppy drives.



German Wikipedia seems to know how to stack Commodore 4040 drives as well. You simply need to have enough of them ;)







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Apr 4 at 14:23

























answered Apr 4 at 13:51









tofrotofro

16.9k33597




16.9k33597







  • 1





    "Heat really shouldn't be a problem with floppy drives." That's true but the power supply generates heat.

    – snips-n-snails
    Apr 4 at 18:36






  • 1





    @traal but you won't stack the power supply?

    – tofro
    Apr 4 at 18:38











  • On the top or the bottom? Passive or active cooling?

    – snips-n-snails
    Apr 4 at 18:53












  • 1





    "Heat really shouldn't be a problem with floppy drives." That's true but the power supply generates heat.

    – snips-n-snails
    Apr 4 at 18:36






  • 1





    @traal but you won't stack the power supply?

    – tofro
    Apr 4 at 18:38











  • On the top or the bottom? Passive or active cooling?

    – snips-n-snails
    Apr 4 at 18:53







1




1





"Heat really shouldn't be a problem with floppy drives." That's true but the power supply generates heat.

– snips-n-snails
Apr 4 at 18:36





"Heat really shouldn't be a problem with floppy drives." That's true but the power supply generates heat.

– snips-n-snails
Apr 4 at 18:36




1




1





@traal but you won't stack the power supply?

– tofro
Apr 4 at 18:38





@traal but you won't stack the power supply?

– tofro
Apr 4 at 18:38













On the top or the bottom? Passive or active cooling?

– snips-n-snails
Apr 4 at 18:53





On the top or the bottom? Passive or active cooling?

– snips-n-snails
Apr 4 at 18:53











5














One configuration I think Raffzahn missed so far was two independent drives stacked on top of each other. That was the recommended method for multiple Amstrad 3" drives:
amstrad cpc464



(Image source: Gallery - Category: CPC464 - Image: CPC464 (b) setup - Roland in the caves)






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    Common for CBM PET drives I can remember having a stack 3 or 4 high of the various drives.

    – Neuromancer
    2 days ago















5














One configuration I think Raffzahn missed so far was two independent drives stacked on top of each other. That was the recommended method for multiple Amstrad 3" drives:
amstrad cpc464



(Image source: Gallery - Category: CPC464 - Image: CPC464 (b) setup - Roland in the caves)






share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    Common for CBM PET drives I can remember having a stack 3 or 4 high of the various drives.

    – Neuromancer
    2 days ago













5












5








5







One configuration I think Raffzahn missed so far was two independent drives stacked on top of each other. That was the recommended method for multiple Amstrad 3" drives:
amstrad cpc464



(Image source: Gallery - Category: CPC464 - Image: CPC464 (b) setup - Roland in the caves)






share|improve this answer













One configuration I think Raffzahn missed so far was two independent drives stacked on top of each other. That was the recommended method for multiple Amstrad 3" drives:
amstrad cpc464



(Image source: Gallery - Category: CPC464 - Image: CPC464 (b) setup - Roland in the caves)







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Apr 5 at 3:29









scrussscruss

7,56611450




7,56611450







  • 1





    Common for CBM PET drives I can remember having a stack 3 or 4 high of the various drives.

    – Neuromancer
    2 days ago












  • 1





    Common for CBM PET drives I can remember having a stack 3 or 4 high of the various drives.

    – Neuromancer
    2 days ago







1




1





Common for CBM PET drives I can remember having a stack 3 or 4 high of the various drives.

– Neuromancer
2 days ago





Common for CBM PET drives I can remember having a stack 3 or 4 high of the various drives.

– Neuromancer
2 days ago











4














In the TRS-80 Model I and Model II ecosystems, floppy drives normally had the disk oriented vertically. This made the drives "tall rather than wide", and placing multiple drives side-by-side worked well.
enter image description here



In the Model III, two horizontal drives were stacked vertically in the main housing, to the right of the CRT (and above the numeric keypad).



Model III






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    While interesting, this is not really an answer to the question

    – tofro
    Apr 7 at 7:29















4














In the TRS-80 Model I and Model II ecosystems, floppy drives normally had the disk oriented vertically. This made the drives "tall rather than wide", and placing multiple drives side-by-side worked well.
enter image description here



In the Model III, two horizontal drives were stacked vertically in the main housing, to the right of the CRT (and above the numeric keypad).



Model III






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    While interesting, this is not really an answer to the question

    – tofro
    Apr 7 at 7:29













4












4








4







In the TRS-80 Model I and Model II ecosystems, floppy drives normally had the disk oriented vertically. This made the drives "tall rather than wide", and placing multiple drives side-by-side worked well.
enter image description here



In the Model III, two horizontal drives were stacked vertically in the main housing, to the right of the CRT (and above the numeric keypad).



Model III






share|improve this answer















In the TRS-80 Model I and Model II ecosystems, floppy drives normally had the disk oriented vertically. This made the drives "tall rather than wide", and placing multiple drives side-by-side worked well.
enter image description here



In the Model III, two horizontal drives were stacked vertically in the main housing, to the right of the CRT (and above the numeric keypad).



Model III







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Apr 8 at 15:07

























answered Apr 4 at 15:43









jeffBjeffB

71828




71828







  • 1





    While interesting, this is not really an answer to the question

    – tofro
    Apr 7 at 7:29












  • 1





    While interesting, this is not really an answer to the question

    – tofro
    Apr 7 at 7:29







1




1





While interesting, this is not really an answer to the question

– tofro
Apr 7 at 7:29





While interesting, this is not really an answer to the question

– tofro
Apr 7 at 7:29











2














Yes, of course external disk drives were often stacked. The LaCie 'Joule' external
disk tower was a vertical stack/rack for drive modules,depicted here and many
external disk cases were given interlocking features (feet or molded plastic
shapes that would keep a stacked unit from sliding off).






share|improve this answer























  • those don't seem to be floppies, though.

    – scruss
    Apr 8 at 15:54











  • Until USB came along, no Mac supported multiple externals except SCSI (usually hard disks, optical, or super-floppy); there was only a connector for a single floppy external, so no stacking issue there.

    – Whit3rd
    Apr 8 at 21:29











  • the question wasn't limited to Macs, though

    – scruss
    Apr 8 at 22:24






  • 1





    @scruss The answer isn't limited to Macs, either; SCSI allowed a half dozen externals, or more, on any suitably equipped computers; SGI, DEC, Sun, IBM, all had SCSI externals.

    – Whit3rd
    Apr 9 at 6:01
















2














Yes, of course external disk drives were often stacked. The LaCie 'Joule' external
disk tower was a vertical stack/rack for drive modules,depicted here and many
external disk cases were given interlocking features (feet or molded plastic
shapes that would keep a stacked unit from sliding off).






share|improve this answer























  • those don't seem to be floppies, though.

    – scruss
    Apr 8 at 15:54











  • Until USB came along, no Mac supported multiple externals except SCSI (usually hard disks, optical, or super-floppy); there was only a connector for a single floppy external, so no stacking issue there.

    – Whit3rd
    Apr 8 at 21:29











  • the question wasn't limited to Macs, though

    – scruss
    Apr 8 at 22:24






  • 1





    @scruss The answer isn't limited to Macs, either; SCSI allowed a half dozen externals, or more, on any suitably equipped computers; SGI, DEC, Sun, IBM, all had SCSI externals.

    – Whit3rd
    Apr 9 at 6:01














2












2








2







Yes, of course external disk drives were often stacked. The LaCie 'Joule' external
disk tower was a vertical stack/rack for drive modules,depicted here and many
external disk cases were given interlocking features (feet or molded plastic
shapes that would keep a stacked unit from sliding off).






share|improve this answer













Yes, of course external disk drives were often stacked. The LaCie 'Joule' external
disk tower was a vertical stack/rack for drive modules,depicted here and many
external disk cases were given interlocking features (feet or molded plastic
shapes that would keep a stacked unit from sliding off).







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Apr 5 at 10:02









Whit3rdWhit3rd

1,01828




1,01828












  • those don't seem to be floppies, though.

    – scruss
    Apr 8 at 15:54











  • Until USB came along, no Mac supported multiple externals except SCSI (usually hard disks, optical, or super-floppy); there was only a connector for a single floppy external, so no stacking issue there.

    – Whit3rd
    Apr 8 at 21:29











  • the question wasn't limited to Macs, though

    – scruss
    Apr 8 at 22:24






  • 1





    @scruss The answer isn't limited to Macs, either; SCSI allowed a half dozen externals, or more, on any suitably equipped computers; SGI, DEC, Sun, IBM, all had SCSI externals.

    – Whit3rd
    Apr 9 at 6:01


















  • those don't seem to be floppies, though.

    – scruss
    Apr 8 at 15:54











  • Until USB came along, no Mac supported multiple externals except SCSI (usually hard disks, optical, or super-floppy); there was only a connector for a single floppy external, so no stacking issue there.

    – Whit3rd
    Apr 8 at 21:29











  • the question wasn't limited to Macs, though

    – scruss
    Apr 8 at 22:24






  • 1





    @scruss The answer isn't limited to Macs, either; SCSI allowed a half dozen externals, or more, on any suitably equipped computers; SGI, DEC, Sun, IBM, all had SCSI externals.

    – Whit3rd
    Apr 9 at 6:01

















those don't seem to be floppies, though.

– scruss
Apr 8 at 15:54





those don't seem to be floppies, though.

– scruss
Apr 8 at 15:54













Until USB came along, no Mac supported multiple externals except SCSI (usually hard disks, optical, or super-floppy); there was only a connector for a single floppy external, so no stacking issue there.

– Whit3rd
Apr 8 at 21:29





Until USB came along, no Mac supported multiple externals except SCSI (usually hard disks, optical, or super-floppy); there was only a connector for a single floppy external, so no stacking issue there.

– Whit3rd
Apr 8 at 21:29













the question wasn't limited to Macs, though

– scruss
Apr 8 at 22:24





the question wasn't limited to Macs, though

– scruss
Apr 8 at 22:24




1




1





@scruss The answer isn't limited to Macs, either; SCSI allowed a half dozen externals, or more, on any suitably equipped computers; SGI, DEC, Sun, IBM, all had SCSI externals.

– Whit3rd
Apr 9 at 6:01






@scruss The answer isn't limited to Macs, either; SCSI allowed a half dozen externals, or more, on any suitably equipped computers; SGI, DEC, Sun, IBM, all had SCSI externals.

– Whit3rd
Apr 9 at 6:01


















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Retrocomputing Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fretrocomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9569%2fwere-any-external-disk-drives-stacked-vertically%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Adding axes to figuresAdding axes labels to LaTeX figuresLaTeX equivalent of ConTeXt buffersRotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?adding axes to shapesAlign axes across subfiguresAdding figures with a certain orderLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themAdding axes labels to LaTeX figures

Tähtien Talli Jäsenet | Lähteet | NavigointivalikkoSuomen Hippos – Tähtien Talli

Do these cracks on my tires look bad? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowDry rot tire should I replace?Having to replace tiresFishtailed so easily? Bad tires? ABS?Filling the tires with something other than air, to avoid puncture hassles?Used Michelin tires safe to install?Do these tyre cracks necessitate replacement?Rumbling noise: tires or mechanicalIs it possible to fix noisy feathered tires?Are bad winter tires still better than summer tires in winter?Torque converter failure - Related to replacing only 2 tires?Why use snow tires on all 4 wheels on 2-wheel-drive cars?