Is there any reason not to eat food that's been dropped on the surface of the moon?Precision Destruction by a Cosmic Being (Or how to destroy StackExchange from space)Can we 'beam' energy from the moon?How much stuff could we get into Earth orbit for the start-up cost of initiating asteroid mining?How To Eat the MoonSpace - the ultimate landfillNo More Looking from the Same Side of a Mostly Liquid Surface Terrestrial-based MoonIs there dry land on Earth if the moon orbits just above its Roche limit?No! Not the moon!If there was a Counter-Earth on the other side of the Sun, when would it have been discovered?Would a superintelligent-AI prefer being based on Earth or on the Moon?

A reference to a well-known characterization of scattered compact spaces

What reasons are there for a Capitalist to oppose a 100% inheritance tax?

Alternative to sending password over mail?

I would say: "You are another teacher", but she is a woman and I am a man

Does casting Light, or a similar spell, have any effect when the caster is swallowed by a monster?

CAST throwing error when run in stored procedure but not when run as raw query

Mathematica command that allows it to read my intentions

One verb to replace 'be a member of' a club

What's the point of deactivating Num Lock on login screens?

What does it mean to describe someone as a butt steak?

Neighboring nodes in the network

What is the difference between 仮定 and 想定?

What killed these X2 caps?

How to prevent "they're falling in love" trope

How can I prevent hyper evolved versions of regular creatures from wiping out their cousins?

Could the museum Saturn V's be refitted for one more flight?

Is there a way of "bevelling" a single vertex?

How much of data wrangling is a data scientist's job?

Arrow those variables!

A category-like structure without composition?

Why was the shrinking from 8″ made only to 5.25″ and not smaller (4″ or less)?

Is it inappropriate for a student to attend their mentor's dissertation defense?

How do I gain back my faith in my PhD degree?

If human space travel is limited by the G force vulnerability, is there a way to counter G forces?



Is there any reason not to eat food that's been dropped on the surface of the moon?


Precision Destruction by a Cosmic Being (Or how to destroy StackExchange from space)Can we 'beam' energy from the moon?How much stuff could we get into Earth orbit for the start-up cost of initiating asteroid mining?How To Eat the MoonSpace - the ultimate landfillNo More Looking from the Same Side of a Mostly Liquid Surface Terrestrial-based MoonIs there dry land on Earth if the moon orbits just above its Roche limit?No! Not the moon!If there was a Counter-Earth on the other side of the Sun, when would it have been discovered?Would a superintelligent-AI prefer being based on Earth or on the Moon?













39












$begingroup$


Are there any kind of contaminants or other reasons that might be dangerous? I'd assume that as far as microbes/bacteria goes, eating off the ground on the moon is much safer than it would be on earth.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    $endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    Mar 27 at 12:50















39












$begingroup$


Are there any kind of contaminants or other reasons that might be dangerous? I'd assume that as far as microbes/bacteria goes, eating off the ground on the moon is much safer than it would be on earth.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    $endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    Mar 27 at 12:50













39












39








39


3



$begingroup$


Are there any kind of contaminants or other reasons that might be dangerous? I'd assume that as far as microbes/bacteria goes, eating off the ground on the moon is much safer than it would be on earth.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




Are there any kind of contaminants or other reasons that might be dangerous? I'd assume that as far as microbes/bacteria goes, eating off the ground on the moon is much safer than it would be on earth.







space






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Mar 26 at 12:42









VigléViglé

19923




19923











  • $begingroup$
    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    $endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    Mar 27 at 12:50
















  • $begingroup$
    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    $endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    Mar 27 at 12:50















$begingroup$
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch
Mar 27 at 12:50




$begingroup$
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch
Mar 27 at 12:50










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















98












$begingroup$

Lunar regolith/soil/dust is probably rather nasty stuff to ingest.



Where the dust on earth has been whirled about in air currents and rounded off, lunar dust is quite sharp and abrasive. It's similar to the difference between pebbles that have been rounded by water in rivers and coastlines, and regular uneroded rocks. This is true even for the finest of particles.



If you scroll down to the 'harmful effects' section of the linked wiki page, it details some of the problems if you breathe it in (effects similar to silicosis). While your digestive tract is largely a little sturdier than your lungs when it comes to ingesting stuff you shouldn't, I doubt eating significant quantities of what amounts to glass dust would do you much good.



Edit: turns out it's even nastier!



As @TomášZato mentions in the comments, lunar dust also has a significant amount of unreacted molecules and compounds in it. On earth, these have usually reacted a long time ago and are now inert. Needless to say, ingesting particles of reactive matter is also not recommended.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 38




    $begingroup$
    "Moon dust! The new craze is here: Internal scrub! Clean your system from the inside out!* *Warning: Effects might be permanent
    $endgroup$
    – Martijn
    Mar 26 at 13:15







  • 68




    $begingroup$
    "The bean counters told me we literally could not afford to buy seven dollars worth of moon rocks, much less seventy million. Bought 'em anyway. Ground 'em up, mixed em into a gel." ref "And guess what? Ground up moon rocks are pure poison. I am deathly ill." ref
    $endgroup$
    – Baldrickk
    Mar 26 at 13:30






  • 16




    $begingroup$
    @Baldrickk "Still, turns out they're a great portal conductor."
    $endgroup$
    – Ynneadwraith
    Mar 26 at 13:50






  • 14




    $begingroup$
    @Ynneadwraith indeed. When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade, make life take the lemons back! (especially prudent advice when covered in lunar regolith)
    $endgroup$
    – Baldrickk
    Mar 26 at 13:53






  • 10




    $begingroup$
    @bukwyrm It's not the large bits that we're worried about. It's the dust. The fine abrasive particles that would coat the food and be very difficult to wholly remove (judging by the experience of cleaning astronauts EV suits). Not strictly deadly in tiny quantities, but still not something you want to be regularly ingesting (much like glass dust). Active coal may not be terribly problematic, but that doesn't mean ingesting things like elemental phosphorus, sodium, potassium and manganese are a great idea.
    $endgroup$
    – Ynneadwraith
    Mar 26 at 14:46


















18












$begingroup$

Brush it off, eat it.



Of course there are trace amounts of elements present that are potentially harmful, but the bulk is made up of benign stuff: 50% SiO2, 15% Al2O3, 10% CaO, 10% MgO, 5% TiO2 and 5-15% iron. There will be no microorganisms, no parasites, no viruses, no higher organic poisons. there will be mostly sand-like stuff.



About the trace amounts of less cheerful stuff: Consider how much regolith will remain on your dropped sand(ha!)wich - One gram would be much even if you rolled it around in the stuff. Say 1/1000th of that is Chromium (it is not), and pretend all of that then proceeds to villainly oxidise into hexavalent Chromium (the deadly stuff) instead of trivalent Chromium (the vitally important stuff). LD50 for hexavalent Chromium is 50-150 mg/kg ... And you just now ingested .01 mg/kg (if you weigh 100kg). You are safe (but don't make a habit out of it!)



The sharp edges of the stuff will not be an issue either: very large shards of freshly broken glass pose a hazard to your digestive tract, but anything on the scale of 'stuff clinging to your sandwich' does not. If you bite off a shard off a glass of water (as children sometimes do) many emergency personnel will only intervene by making them eat some bread afterwards. It all gets buffered by the slime. http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2007/01/18/1828923.htm



Of course it's not Best Practices to eat stuff from the ground, but a little regolith won't hurt.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 6




    $begingroup$
    It is my understanding that one of the Apollo 17 (?) astronauts was accidently exposed to a small amount of regolith and developed a significant rash from it. If I can find a reference, I'll add it, but even if not, I would not be so blythe as to just assume it cannot be harmful.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 26 at 16:18






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @PaulSinclair i listed the bulk ingredients. If you have a Zn allergy and/or get the stuff in your breeches you might have a bad time. Point is OP asked about dropped food, not snuffing it, eating bulk amounts, rubbing yourself with it or any other regolith based abuse. If you can point to a compound that is critical in the amounts ingested (ppm in bolus of 1 g) and probable to exist in Regolith, go ahead.
    $endgroup$
    – bukwyrm
    Mar 26 at 16:27






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @bukwyrm - As I understand it (again, I'll have to do some searching to find the reference and confirm or deny my memory), the rash was not cause allergens or toxicity, but rather the skin irritation from the jagged dust.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 26 at 16:29







  • 7




    $begingroup$
    You'd have to have some pretty through cleaning methods for 'brushing it off' before eating that food. It's possible, but moon dust is difficult to get off of stuff. blogs.discovermagazine.com/d-brief/2018/03/02/lunar-dust
    $endgroup$
    – Zibbobz
    Mar 26 at 16:29






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @bukwyrm no you are right powdered glass does not appear to be as destructive as I thought. Hoever it does depend on the size of the particles fda.gov/downloads/Food/GuidanceRegulation/UCM252441.pdf
    $endgroup$
    – Slarty
    Mar 26 at 16:39



















4












$begingroup$

It'll break your teeth. The moon is often very cold or very hot on the surface. The sandwich has potentially been flash-frozen or is now burnt depending on where it dropped.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    IIRC, day side gets to over 200° F. Might be more concerned about burning your tongue.
    $endgroup$
    – A C
    Mar 26 at 20:20










  • $begingroup$
    Also true. I'll update the answer.
    $endgroup$
    – liljoshu
    Mar 26 at 20:40






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    How much heat capacity is in lunar regolith? Without atmosphere, the ground is going to cool from the sandwich and stop burning it. And especially if it's loose material, it's not going to conduct well.
    $endgroup$
    – John Dvorak
    Mar 27 at 9:21






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    When I drop food onto a rock, I pick up the food not the rock. The rock is unable to break my teeth. When I drop food onto sand, I pick up the food with a little sand. The food tastes horrible, but it still doesn't break my teeth. As for flash frozen, this all depends on exactly what the food is; you're assuming that it's got a high water content; would be eaten at earth rtp and you're in the dark on the moon - but even if that's the case people eat ice cream all the time without breaking their teeth.
    $endgroup$
    – UKMonkey
    Mar 27 at 15:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Depends a lot on the scenario. Vacuum doesn't transmit heat, so it's going to be a lot closer to its last state. So we have a question of if you're inside a contained atmosphere somehow or not. Though, if you're outside any enclosure, dropping something into lunar regolith and immediately putting it on your tongue, you probably have a lot higher concerns than the food content... such as where did your helmet go, and where are you going to get your next breath. If you're in an enclosure, you're left with the question of why there's lunar regolith there and how it's getting indoors.
    $endgroup$
    – liljoshu
    Mar 27 at 17:52











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142424%2fis-there-any-reason-not-to-eat-food-thats-been-dropped-on-the-surface-of-the-mo%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









98












$begingroup$

Lunar regolith/soil/dust is probably rather nasty stuff to ingest.



Where the dust on earth has been whirled about in air currents and rounded off, lunar dust is quite sharp and abrasive. It's similar to the difference between pebbles that have been rounded by water in rivers and coastlines, and regular uneroded rocks. This is true even for the finest of particles.



If you scroll down to the 'harmful effects' section of the linked wiki page, it details some of the problems if you breathe it in (effects similar to silicosis). While your digestive tract is largely a little sturdier than your lungs when it comes to ingesting stuff you shouldn't, I doubt eating significant quantities of what amounts to glass dust would do you much good.



Edit: turns out it's even nastier!



As @TomášZato mentions in the comments, lunar dust also has a significant amount of unreacted molecules and compounds in it. On earth, these have usually reacted a long time ago and are now inert. Needless to say, ingesting particles of reactive matter is also not recommended.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 38




    $begingroup$
    "Moon dust! The new craze is here: Internal scrub! Clean your system from the inside out!* *Warning: Effects might be permanent
    $endgroup$
    – Martijn
    Mar 26 at 13:15







  • 68




    $begingroup$
    "The bean counters told me we literally could not afford to buy seven dollars worth of moon rocks, much less seventy million. Bought 'em anyway. Ground 'em up, mixed em into a gel." ref "And guess what? Ground up moon rocks are pure poison. I am deathly ill." ref
    $endgroup$
    – Baldrickk
    Mar 26 at 13:30






  • 16




    $begingroup$
    @Baldrickk "Still, turns out they're a great portal conductor."
    $endgroup$
    – Ynneadwraith
    Mar 26 at 13:50






  • 14




    $begingroup$
    @Ynneadwraith indeed. When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade, make life take the lemons back! (especially prudent advice when covered in lunar regolith)
    $endgroup$
    – Baldrickk
    Mar 26 at 13:53






  • 10




    $begingroup$
    @bukwyrm It's not the large bits that we're worried about. It's the dust. The fine abrasive particles that would coat the food and be very difficult to wholly remove (judging by the experience of cleaning astronauts EV suits). Not strictly deadly in tiny quantities, but still not something you want to be regularly ingesting (much like glass dust). Active coal may not be terribly problematic, but that doesn't mean ingesting things like elemental phosphorus, sodium, potassium and manganese are a great idea.
    $endgroup$
    – Ynneadwraith
    Mar 26 at 14:46















98












$begingroup$

Lunar regolith/soil/dust is probably rather nasty stuff to ingest.



Where the dust on earth has been whirled about in air currents and rounded off, lunar dust is quite sharp and abrasive. It's similar to the difference between pebbles that have been rounded by water in rivers and coastlines, and regular uneroded rocks. This is true even for the finest of particles.



If you scroll down to the 'harmful effects' section of the linked wiki page, it details some of the problems if you breathe it in (effects similar to silicosis). While your digestive tract is largely a little sturdier than your lungs when it comes to ingesting stuff you shouldn't, I doubt eating significant quantities of what amounts to glass dust would do you much good.



Edit: turns out it's even nastier!



As @TomášZato mentions in the comments, lunar dust also has a significant amount of unreacted molecules and compounds in it. On earth, these have usually reacted a long time ago and are now inert. Needless to say, ingesting particles of reactive matter is also not recommended.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 38




    $begingroup$
    "Moon dust! The new craze is here: Internal scrub! Clean your system from the inside out!* *Warning: Effects might be permanent
    $endgroup$
    – Martijn
    Mar 26 at 13:15







  • 68




    $begingroup$
    "The bean counters told me we literally could not afford to buy seven dollars worth of moon rocks, much less seventy million. Bought 'em anyway. Ground 'em up, mixed em into a gel." ref "And guess what? Ground up moon rocks are pure poison. I am deathly ill." ref
    $endgroup$
    – Baldrickk
    Mar 26 at 13:30






  • 16




    $begingroup$
    @Baldrickk "Still, turns out they're a great portal conductor."
    $endgroup$
    – Ynneadwraith
    Mar 26 at 13:50






  • 14




    $begingroup$
    @Ynneadwraith indeed. When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade, make life take the lemons back! (especially prudent advice when covered in lunar regolith)
    $endgroup$
    – Baldrickk
    Mar 26 at 13:53






  • 10




    $begingroup$
    @bukwyrm It's not the large bits that we're worried about. It's the dust. The fine abrasive particles that would coat the food and be very difficult to wholly remove (judging by the experience of cleaning astronauts EV suits). Not strictly deadly in tiny quantities, but still not something you want to be regularly ingesting (much like glass dust). Active coal may not be terribly problematic, but that doesn't mean ingesting things like elemental phosphorus, sodium, potassium and manganese are a great idea.
    $endgroup$
    – Ynneadwraith
    Mar 26 at 14:46













98












98








98





$begingroup$

Lunar regolith/soil/dust is probably rather nasty stuff to ingest.



Where the dust on earth has been whirled about in air currents and rounded off, lunar dust is quite sharp and abrasive. It's similar to the difference between pebbles that have been rounded by water in rivers and coastlines, and regular uneroded rocks. This is true even for the finest of particles.



If you scroll down to the 'harmful effects' section of the linked wiki page, it details some of the problems if you breathe it in (effects similar to silicosis). While your digestive tract is largely a little sturdier than your lungs when it comes to ingesting stuff you shouldn't, I doubt eating significant quantities of what amounts to glass dust would do you much good.



Edit: turns out it's even nastier!



As @TomášZato mentions in the comments, lunar dust also has a significant amount of unreacted molecules and compounds in it. On earth, these have usually reacted a long time ago and are now inert. Needless to say, ingesting particles of reactive matter is also not recommended.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Lunar regolith/soil/dust is probably rather nasty stuff to ingest.



Where the dust on earth has been whirled about in air currents and rounded off, lunar dust is quite sharp and abrasive. It's similar to the difference between pebbles that have been rounded by water in rivers and coastlines, and regular uneroded rocks. This is true even for the finest of particles.



If you scroll down to the 'harmful effects' section of the linked wiki page, it details some of the problems if you breathe it in (effects similar to silicosis). While your digestive tract is largely a little sturdier than your lungs when it comes to ingesting stuff you shouldn't, I doubt eating significant quantities of what amounts to glass dust would do you much good.



Edit: turns out it's even nastier!



As @TomášZato mentions in the comments, lunar dust also has a significant amount of unreacted molecules and compounds in it. On earth, these have usually reacted a long time ago and are now inert. Needless to say, ingesting particles of reactive matter is also not recommended.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 26 at 13:47

























answered Mar 26 at 12:51









YnneadwraithYnneadwraith

5,35611528




5,35611528







  • 38




    $begingroup$
    "Moon dust! The new craze is here: Internal scrub! Clean your system from the inside out!* *Warning: Effects might be permanent
    $endgroup$
    – Martijn
    Mar 26 at 13:15







  • 68




    $begingroup$
    "The bean counters told me we literally could not afford to buy seven dollars worth of moon rocks, much less seventy million. Bought 'em anyway. Ground 'em up, mixed em into a gel." ref "And guess what? Ground up moon rocks are pure poison. I am deathly ill." ref
    $endgroup$
    – Baldrickk
    Mar 26 at 13:30






  • 16




    $begingroup$
    @Baldrickk "Still, turns out they're a great portal conductor."
    $endgroup$
    – Ynneadwraith
    Mar 26 at 13:50






  • 14




    $begingroup$
    @Ynneadwraith indeed. When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade, make life take the lemons back! (especially prudent advice when covered in lunar regolith)
    $endgroup$
    – Baldrickk
    Mar 26 at 13:53






  • 10




    $begingroup$
    @bukwyrm It's not the large bits that we're worried about. It's the dust. The fine abrasive particles that would coat the food and be very difficult to wholly remove (judging by the experience of cleaning astronauts EV suits). Not strictly deadly in tiny quantities, but still not something you want to be regularly ingesting (much like glass dust). Active coal may not be terribly problematic, but that doesn't mean ingesting things like elemental phosphorus, sodium, potassium and manganese are a great idea.
    $endgroup$
    – Ynneadwraith
    Mar 26 at 14:46












  • 38




    $begingroup$
    "Moon dust! The new craze is here: Internal scrub! Clean your system from the inside out!* *Warning: Effects might be permanent
    $endgroup$
    – Martijn
    Mar 26 at 13:15







  • 68




    $begingroup$
    "The bean counters told me we literally could not afford to buy seven dollars worth of moon rocks, much less seventy million. Bought 'em anyway. Ground 'em up, mixed em into a gel." ref "And guess what? Ground up moon rocks are pure poison. I am deathly ill." ref
    $endgroup$
    – Baldrickk
    Mar 26 at 13:30






  • 16




    $begingroup$
    @Baldrickk "Still, turns out they're a great portal conductor."
    $endgroup$
    – Ynneadwraith
    Mar 26 at 13:50






  • 14




    $begingroup$
    @Ynneadwraith indeed. When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade, make life take the lemons back! (especially prudent advice when covered in lunar regolith)
    $endgroup$
    – Baldrickk
    Mar 26 at 13:53






  • 10




    $begingroup$
    @bukwyrm It's not the large bits that we're worried about. It's the dust. The fine abrasive particles that would coat the food and be very difficult to wholly remove (judging by the experience of cleaning astronauts EV suits). Not strictly deadly in tiny quantities, but still not something you want to be regularly ingesting (much like glass dust). Active coal may not be terribly problematic, but that doesn't mean ingesting things like elemental phosphorus, sodium, potassium and manganese are a great idea.
    $endgroup$
    – Ynneadwraith
    Mar 26 at 14:46







38




38




$begingroup$
"Moon dust! The new craze is here: Internal scrub! Clean your system from the inside out!* *Warning: Effects might be permanent
$endgroup$
– Martijn
Mar 26 at 13:15





$begingroup$
"Moon dust! The new craze is here: Internal scrub! Clean your system from the inside out!* *Warning: Effects might be permanent
$endgroup$
– Martijn
Mar 26 at 13:15





68




68




$begingroup$
"The bean counters told me we literally could not afford to buy seven dollars worth of moon rocks, much less seventy million. Bought 'em anyway. Ground 'em up, mixed em into a gel." ref "And guess what? Ground up moon rocks are pure poison. I am deathly ill." ref
$endgroup$
– Baldrickk
Mar 26 at 13:30




$begingroup$
"The bean counters told me we literally could not afford to buy seven dollars worth of moon rocks, much less seventy million. Bought 'em anyway. Ground 'em up, mixed em into a gel." ref "And guess what? Ground up moon rocks are pure poison. I am deathly ill." ref
$endgroup$
– Baldrickk
Mar 26 at 13:30




16




16




$begingroup$
@Baldrickk "Still, turns out they're a great portal conductor."
$endgroup$
– Ynneadwraith
Mar 26 at 13:50




$begingroup$
@Baldrickk "Still, turns out they're a great portal conductor."
$endgroup$
– Ynneadwraith
Mar 26 at 13:50




14




14




$begingroup$
@Ynneadwraith indeed. When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade, make life take the lemons back! (especially prudent advice when covered in lunar regolith)
$endgroup$
– Baldrickk
Mar 26 at 13:53




$begingroup$
@Ynneadwraith indeed. When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade, make life take the lemons back! (especially prudent advice when covered in lunar regolith)
$endgroup$
– Baldrickk
Mar 26 at 13:53




10




10




$begingroup$
@bukwyrm It's not the large bits that we're worried about. It's the dust. The fine abrasive particles that would coat the food and be very difficult to wholly remove (judging by the experience of cleaning astronauts EV suits). Not strictly deadly in tiny quantities, but still not something you want to be regularly ingesting (much like glass dust). Active coal may not be terribly problematic, but that doesn't mean ingesting things like elemental phosphorus, sodium, potassium and manganese are a great idea.
$endgroup$
– Ynneadwraith
Mar 26 at 14:46




$begingroup$
@bukwyrm It's not the large bits that we're worried about. It's the dust. The fine abrasive particles that would coat the food and be very difficult to wholly remove (judging by the experience of cleaning astronauts EV suits). Not strictly deadly in tiny quantities, but still not something you want to be regularly ingesting (much like glass dust). Active coal may not be terribly problematic, but that doesn't mean ingesting things like elemental phosphorus, sodium, potassium and manganese are a great idea.
$endgroup$
– Ynneadwraith
Mar 26 at 14:46











18












$begingroup$

Brush it off, eat it.



Of course there are trace amounts of elements present that are potentially harmful, but the bulk is made up of benign stuff: 50% SiO2, 15% Al2O3, 10% CaO, 10% MgO, 5% TiO2 and 5-15% iron. There will be no microorganisms, no parasites, no viruses, no higher organic poisons. there will be mostly sand-like stuff.



About the trace amounts of less cheerful stuff: Consider how much regolith will remain on your dropped sand(ha!)wich - One gram would be much even if you rolled it around in the stuff. Say 1/1000th of that is Chromium (it is not), and pretend all of that then proceeds to villainly oxidise into hexavalent Chromium (the deadly stuff) instead of trivalent Chromium (the vitally important stuff). LD50 for hexavalent Chromium is 50-150 mg/kg ... And you just now ingested .01 mg/kg (if you weigh 100kg). You are safe (but don't make a habit out of it!)



The sharp edges of the stuff will not be an issue either: very large shards of freshly broken glass pose a hazard to your digestive tract, but anything on the scale of 'stuff clinging to your sandwich' does not. If you bite off a shard off a glass of water (as children sometimes do) many emergency personnel will only intervene by making them eat some bread afterwards. It all gets buffered by the slime. http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2007/01/18/1828923.htm



Of course it's not Best Practices to eat stuff from the ground, but a little regolith won't hurt.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 6




    $begingroup$
    It is my understanding that one of the Apollo 17 (?) astronauts was accidently exposed to a small amount of regolith and developed a significant rash from it. If I can find a reference, I'll add it, but even if not, I would not be so blythe as to just assume it cannot be harmful.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 26 at 16:18






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @PaulSinclair i listed the bulk ingredients. If you have a Zn allergy and/or get the stuff in your breeches you might have a bad time. Point is OP asked about dropped food, not snuffing it, eating bulk amounts, rubbing yourself with it or any other regolith based abuse. If you can point to a compound that is critical in the amounts ingested (ppm in bolus of 1 g) and probable to exist in Regolith, go ahead.
    $endgroup$
    – bukwyrm
    Mar 26 at 16:27






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @bukwyrm - As I understand it (again, I'll have to do some searching to find the reference and confirm or deny my memory), the rash was not cause allergens or toxicity, but rather the skin irritation from the jagged dust.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 26 at 16:29







  • 7




    $begingroup$
    You'd have to have some pretty through cleaning methods for 'brushing it off' before eating that food. It's possible, but moon dust is difficult to get off of stuff. blogs.discovermagazine.com/d-brief/2018/03/02/lunar-dust
    $endgroup$
    – Zibbobz
    Mar 26 at 16:29






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @bukwyrm no you are right powdered glass does not appear to be as destructive as I thought. Hoever it does depend on the size of the particles fda.gov/downloads/Food/GuidanceRegulation/UCM252441.pdf
    $endgroup$
    – Slarty
    Mar 26 at 16:39
















18












$begingroup$

Brush it off, eat it.



Of course there are trace amounts of elements present that are potentially harmful, but the bulk is made up of benign stuff: 50% SiO2, 15% Al2O3, 10% CaO, 10% MgO, 5% TiO2 and 5-15% iron. There will be no microorganisms, no parasites, no viruses, no higher organic poisons. there will be mostly sand-like stuff.



About the trace amounts of less cheerful stuff: Consider how much regolith will remain on your dropped sand(ha!)wich - One gram would be much even if you rolled it around in the stuff. Say 1/1000th of that is Chromium (it is not), and pretend all of that then proceeds to villainly oxidise into hexavalent Chromium (the deadly stuff) instead of trivalent Chromium (the vitally important stuff). LD50 for hexavalent Chromium is 50-150 mg/kg ... And you just now ingested .01 mg/kg (if you weigh 100kg). You are safe (but don't make a habit out of it!)



The sharp edges of the stuff will not be an issue either: very large shards of freshly broken glass pose a hazard to your digestive tract, but anything on the scale of 'stuff clinging to your sandwich' does not. If you bite off a shard off a glass of water (as children sometimes do) many emergency personnel will only intervene by making them eat some bread afterwards. It all gets buffered by the slime. http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2007/01/18/1828923.htm



Of course it's not Best Practices to eat stuff from the ground, but a little regolith won't hurt.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 6




    $begingroup$
    It is my understanding that one of the Apollo 17 (?) astronauts was accidently exposed to a small amount of regolith and developed a significant rash from it. If I can find a reference, I'll add it, but even if not, I would not be so blythe as to just assume it cannot be harmful.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 26 at 16:18






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @PaulSinclair i listed the bulk ingredients. If you have a Zn allergy and/or get the stuff in your breeches you might have a bad time. Point is OP asked about dropped food, not snuffing it, eating bulk amounts, rubbing yourself with it or any other regolith based abuse. If you can point to a compound that is critical in the amounts ingested (ppm in bolus of 1 g) and probable to exist in Regolith, go ahead.
    $endgroup$
    – bukwyrm
    Mar 26 at 16:27






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @bukwyrm - As I understand it (again, I'll have to do some searching to find the reference and confirm or deny my memory), the rash was not cause allergens or toxicity, but rather the skin irritation from the jagged dust.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 26 at 16:29







  • 7




    $begingroup$
    You'd have to have some pretty through cleaning methods for 'brushing it off' before eating that food. It's possible, but moon dust is difficult to get off of stuff. blogs.discovermagazine.com/d-brief/2018/03/02/lunar-dust
    $endgroup$
    – Zibbobz
    Mar 26 at 16:29






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @bukwyrm no you are right powdered glass does not appear to be as destructive as I thought. Hoever it does depend on the size of the particles fda.gov/downloads/Food/GuidanceRegulation/UCM252441.pdf
    $endgroup$
    – Slarty
    Mar 26 at 16:39














18












18








18





$begingroup$

Brush it off, eat it.



Of course there are trace amounts of elements present that are potentially harmful, but the bulk is made up of benign stuff: 50% SiO2, 15% Al2O3, 10% CaO, 10% MgO, 5% TiO2 and 5-15% iron. There will be no microorganisms, no parasites, no viruses, no higher organic poisons. there will be mostly sand-like stuff.



About the trace amounts of less cheerful stuff: Consider how much regolith will remain on your dropped sand(ha!)wich - One gram would be much even if you rolled it around in the stuff. Say 1/1000th of that is Chromium (it is not), and pretend all of that then proceeds to villainly oxidise into hexavalent Chromium (the deadly stuff) instead of trivalent Chromium (the vitally important stuff). LD50 for hexavalent Chromium is 50-150 mg/kg ... And you just now ingested .01 mg/kg (if you weigh 100kg). You are safe (but don't make a habit out of it!)



The sharp edges of the stuff will not be an issue either: very large shards of freshly broken glass pose a hazard to your digestive tract, but anything on the scale of 'stuff clinging to your sandwich' does not. If you bite off a shard off a glass of water (as children sometimes do) many emergency personnel will only intervene by making them eat some bread afterwards. It all gets buffered by the slime. http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2007/01/18/1828923.htm



Of course it's not Best Practices to eat stuff from the ground, but a little regolith won't hurt.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Brush it off, eat it.



Of course there are trace amounts of elements present that are potentially harmful, but the bulk is made up of benign stuff: 50% SiO2, 15% Al2O3, 10% CaO, 10% MgO, 5% TiO2 and 5-15% iron. There will be no microorganisms, no parasites, no viruses, no higher organic poisons. there will be mostly sand-like stuff.



About the trace amounts of less cheerful stuff: Consider how much regolith will remain on your dropped sand(ha!)wich - One gram would be much even if you rolled it around in the stuff. Say 1/1000th of that is Chromium (it is not), and pretend all of that then proceeds to villainly oxidise into hexavalent Chromium (the deadly stuff) instead of trivalent Chromium (the vitally important stuff). LD50 for hexavalent Chromium is 50-150 mg/kg ... And you just now ingested .01 mg/kg (if you weigh 100kg). You are safe (but don't make a habit out of it!)



The sharp edges of the stuff will not be an issue either: very large shards of freshly broken glass pose a hazard to your digestive tract, but anything on the scale of 'stuff clinging to your sandwich' does not. If you bite off a shard off a glass of water (as children sometimes do) many emergency personnel will only intervene by making them eat some bread afterwards. It all gets buffered by the slime. http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2007/01/18/1828923.htm



Of course it's not Best Practices to eat stuff from the ground, but a little regolith won't hurt.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 28 at 6:29

























answered Mar 26 at 15:01









bukwyrmbukwyrm

4,087724




4,087724







  • 6




    $begingroup$
    It is my understanding that one of the Apollo 17 (?) astronauts was accidently exposed to a small amount of regolith and developed a significant rash from it. If I can find a reference, I'll add it, but even if not, I would not be so blythe as to just assume it cannot be harmful.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 26 at 16:18






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @PaulSinclair i listed the bulk ingredients. If you have a Zn allergy and/or get the stuff in your breeches you might have a bad time. Point is OP asked about dropped food, not snuffing it, eating bulk amounts, rubbing yourself with it or any other regolith based abuse. If you can point to a compound that is critical in the amounts ingested (ppm in bolus of 1 g) and probable to exist in Regolith, go ahead.
    $endgroup$
    – bukwyrm
    Mar 26 at 16:27






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @bukwyrm - As I understand it (again, I'll have to do some searching to find the reference and confirm or deny my memory), the rash was not cause allergens or toxicity, but rather the skin irritation from the jagged dust.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 26 at 16:29







  • 7




    $begingroup$
    You'd have to have some pretty through cleaning methods for 'brushing it off' before eating that food. It's possible, but moon dust is difficult to get off of stuff. blogs.discovermagazine.com/d-brief/2018/03/02/lunar-dust
    $endgroup$
    – Zibbobz
    Mar 26 at 16:29






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @bukwyrm no you are right powdered glass does not appear to be as destructive as I thought. Hoever it does depend on the size of the particles fda.gov/downloads/Food/GuidanceRegulation/UCM252441.pdf
    $endgroup$
    – Slarty
    Mar 26 at 16:39













  • 6




    $begingroup$
    It is my understanding that one of the Apollo 17 (?) astronauts was accidently exposed to a small amount of regolith and developed a significant rash from it. If I can find a reference, I'll add it, but even if not, I would not be so blythe as to just assume it cannot be harmful.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 26 at 16:18






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @PaulSinclair i listed the bulk ingredients. If you have a Zn allergy and/or get the stuff in your breeches you might have a bad time. Point is OP asked about dropped food, not snuffing it, eating bulk amounts, rubbing yourself with it or any other regolith based abuse. If you can point to a compound that is critical in the amounts ingested (ppm in bolus of 1 g) and probable to exist in Regolith, go ahead.
    $endgroup$
    – bukwyrm
    Mar 26 at 16:27






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @bukwyrm - As I understand it (again, I'll have to do some searching to find the reference and confirm or deny my memory), the rash was not cause allergens or toxicity, but rather the skin irritation from the jagged dust.
    $endgroup$
    – Paul Sinclair
    Mar 26 at 16:29







  • 7




    $begingroup$
    You'd have to have some pretty through cleaning methods for 'brushing it off' before eating that food. It's possible, but moon dust is difficult to get off of stuff. blogs.discovermagazine.com/d-brief/2018/03/02/lunar-dust
    $endgroup$
    – Zibbobz
    Mar 26 at 16:29






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @bukwyrm no you are right powdered glass does not appear to be as destructive as I thought. Hoever it does depend on the size of the particles fda.gov/downloads/Food/GuidanceRegulation/UCM252441.pdf
    $endgroup$
    – Slarty
    Mar 26 at 16:39








6




6




$begingroup$
It is my understanding that one of the Apollo 17 (?) astronauts was accidently exposed to a small amount of regolith and developed a significant rash from it. If I can find a reference, I'll add it, but even if not, I would not be so blythe as to just assume it cannot be harmful.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Mar 26 at 16:18




$begingroup$
It is my understanding that one of the Apollo 17 (?) astronauts was accidently exposed to a small amount of regolith and developed a significant rash from it. If I can find a reference, I'll add it, but even if not, I would not be so blythe as to just assume it cannot be harmful.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Mar 26 at 16:18




1




1




$begingroup$
@PaulSinclair i listed the bulk ingredients. If you have a Zn allergy and/or get the stuff in your breeches you might have a bad time. Point is OP asked about dropped food, not snuffing it, eating bulk amounts, rubbing yourself with it or any other regolith based abuse. If you can point to a compound that is critical in the amounts ingested (ppm in bolus of 1 g) and probable to exist in Regolith, go ahead.
$endgroup$
– bukwyrm
Mar 26 at 16:27




$begingroup$
@PaulSinclair i listed the bulk ingredients. If you have a Zn allergy and/or get the stuff in your breeches you might have a bad time. Point is OP asked about dropped food, not snuffing it, eating bulk amounts, rubbing yourself with it or any other regolith based abuse. If you can point to a compound that is critical in the amounts ingested (ppm in bolus of 1 g) and probable to exist in Regolith, go ahead.
$endgroup$
– bukwyrm
Mar 26 at 16:27




3




3




$begingroup$
@bukwyrm - As I understand it (again, I'll have to do some searching to find the reference and confirm or deny my memory), the rash was not cause allergens or toxicity, but rather the skin irritation from the jagged dust.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Mar 26 at 16:29





$begingroup$
@bukwyrm - As I understand it (again, I'll have to do some searching to find the reference and confirm or deny my memory), the rash was not cause allergens or toxicity, but rather the skin irritation from the jagged dust.
$endgroup$
– Paul Sinclair
Mar 26 at 16:29





7




7




$begingroup$
You'd have to have some pretty through cleaning methods for 'brushing it off' before eating that food. It's possible, but moon dust is difficult to get off of stuff. blogs.discovermagazine.com/d-brief/2018/03/02/lunar-dust
$endgroup$
– Zibbobz
Mar 26 at 16:29




$begingroup$
You'd have to have some pretty through cleaning methods for 'brushing it off' before eating that food. It's possible, but moon dust is difficult to get off of stuff. blogs.discovermagazine.com/d-brief/2018/03/02/lunar-dust
$endgroup$
– Zibbobz
Mar 26 at 16:29




2




2




$begingroup$
@bukwyrm no you are right powdered glass does not appear to be as destructive as I thought. Hoever it does depend on the size of the particles fda.gov/downloads/Food/GuidanceRegulation/UCM252441.pdf
$endgroup$
– Slarty
Mar 26 at 16:39





$begingroup$
@bukwyrm no you are right powdered glass does not appear to be as destructive as I thought. Hoever it does depend on the size of the particles fda.gov/downloads/Food/GuidanceRegulation/UCM252441.pdf
$endgroup$
– Slarty
Mar 26 at 16:39












4












$begingroup$

It'll break your teeth. The moon is often very cold or very hot on the surface. The sandwich has potentially been flash-frozen or is now burnt depending on where it dropped.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    IIRC, day side gets to over 200° F. Might be more concerned about burning your tongue.
    $endgroup$
    – A C
    Mar 26 at 20:20










  • $begingroup$
    Also true. I'll update the answer.
    $endgroup$
    – liljoshu
    Mar 26 at 20:40






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    How much heat capacity is in lunar regolith? Without atmosphere, the ground is going to cool from the sandwich and stop burning it. And especially if it's loose material, it's not going to conduct well.
    $endgroup$
    – John Dvorak
    Mar 27 at 9:21






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    When I drop food onto a rock, I pick up the food not the rock. The rock is unable to break my teeth. When I drop food onto sand, I pick up the food with a little sand. The food tastes horrible, but it still doesn't break my teeth. As for flash frozen, this all depends on exactly what the food is; you're assuming that it's got a high water content; would be eaten at earth rtp and you're in the dark on the moon - but even if that's the case people eat ice cream all the time without breaking their teeth.
    $endgroup$
    – UKMonkey
    Mar 27 at 15:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Depends a lot on the scenario. Vacuum doesn't transmit heat, so it's going to be a lot closer to its last state. So we have a question of if you're inside a contained atmosphere somehow or not. Though, if you're outside any enclosure, dropping something into lunar regolith and immediately putting it on your tongue, you probably have a lot higher concerns than the food content... such as where did your helmet go, and where are you going to get your next breath. If you're in an enclosure, you're left with the question of why there's lunar regolith there and how it's getting indoors.
    $endgroup$
    – liljoshu
    Mar 27 at 17:52















4












$begingroup$

It'll break your teeth. The moon is often very cold or very hot on the surface. The sandwich has potentially been flash-frozen or is now burnt depending on where it dropped.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    IIRC, day side gets to over 200° F. Might be more concerned about burning your tongue.
    $endgroup$
    – A C
    Mar 26 at 20:20










  • $begingroup$
    Also true. I'll update the answer.
    $endgroup$
    – liljoshu
    Mar 26 at 20:40






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    How much heat capacity is in lunar regolith? Without atmosphere, the ground is going to cool from the sandwich and stop burning it. And especially if it's loose material, it's not going to conduct well.
    $endgroup$
    – John Dvorak
    Mar 27 at 9:21






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    When I drop food onto a rock, I pick up the food not the rock. The rock is unable to break my teeth. When I drop food onto sand, I pick up the food with a little sand. The food tastes horrible, but it still doesn't break my teeth. As for flash frozen, this all depends on exactly what the food is; you're assuming that it's got a high water content; would be eaten at earth rtp and you're in the dark on the moon - but even if that's the case people eat ice cream all the time without breaking their teeth.
    $endgroup$
    – UKMonkey
    Mar 27 at 15:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Depends a lot on the scenario. Vacuum doesn't transmit heat, so it's going to be a lot closer to its last state. So we have a question of if you're inside a contained atmosphere somehow or not. Though, if you're outside any enclosure, dropping something into lunar regolith and immediately putting it on your tongue, you probably have a lot higher concerns than the food content... such as where did your helmet go, and where are you going to get your next breath. If you're in an enclosure, you're left with the question of why there's lunar regolith there and how it's getting indoors.
    $endgroup$
    – liljoshu
    Mar 27 at 17:52













4












4








4





$begingroup$

It'll break your teeth. The moon is often very cold or very hot on the surface. The sandwich has potentially been flash-frozen or is now burnt depending on where it dropped.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



It'll break your teeth. The moon is often very cold or very hot on the surface. The sandwich has potentially been flash-frozen or is now burnt depending on where it dropped.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 26 at 20:40

























answered Mar 26 at 20:18









liljoshuliljoshu

1,659311




1,659311







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    IIRC, day side gets to over 200° F. Might be more concerned about burning your tongue.
    $endgroup$
    – A C
    Mar 26 at 20:20










  • $begingroup$
    Also true. I'll update the answer.
    $endgroup$
    – liljoshu
    Mar 26 at 20:40






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    How much heat capacity is in lunar regolith? Without atmosphere, the ground is going to cool from the sandwich and stop burning it. And especially if it's loose material, it's not going to conduct well.
    $endgroup$
    – John Dvorak
    Mar 27 at 9:21






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    When I drop food onto a rock, I pick up the food not the rock. The rock is unable to break my teeth. When I drop food onto sand, I pick up the food with a little sand. The food tastes horrible, but it still doesn't break my teeth. As for flash frozen, this all depends on exactly what the food is; you're assuming that it's got a high water content; would be eaten at earth rtp and you're in the dark on the moon - but even if that's the case people eat ice cream all the time without breaking their teeth.
    $endgroup$
    – UKMonkey
    Mar 27 at 15:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Depends a lot on the scenario. Vacuum doesn't transmit heat, so it's going to be a lot closer to its last state. So we have a question of if you're inside a contained atmosphere somehow or not. Though, if you're outside any enclosure, dropping something into lunar regolith and immediately putting it on your tongue, you probably have a lot higher concerns than the food content... such as where did your helmet go, and where are you going to get your next breath. If you're in an enclosure, you're left with the question of why there's lunar regolith there and how it's getting indoors.
    $endgroup$
    – liljoshu
    Mar 27 at 17:52












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    IIRC, day side gets to over 200° F. Might be more concerned about burning your tongue.
    $endgroup$
    – A C
    Mar 26 at 20:20










  • $begingroup$
    Also true. I'll update the answer.
    $endgroup$
    – liljoshu
    Mar 26 at 20:40






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    How much heat capacity is in lunar regolith? Without atmosphere, the ground is going to cool from the sandwich and stop burning it. And especially if it's loose material, it's not going to conduct well.
    $endgroup$
    – John Dvorak
    Mar 27 at 9:21






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    When I drop food onto a rock, I pick up the food not the rock. The rock is unable to break my teeth. When I drop food onto sand, I pick up the food with a little sand. The food tastes horrible, but it still doesn't break my teeth. As for flash frozen, this all depends on exactly what the food is; you're assuming that it's got a high water content; would be eaten at earth rtp and you're in the dark on the moon - but even if that's the case people eat ice cream all the time without breaking their teeth.
    $endgroup$
    – UKMonkey
    Mar 27 at 15:59






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Depends a lot on the scenario. Vacuum doesn't transmit heat, so it's going to be a lot closer to its last state. So we have a question of if you're inside a contained atmosphere somehow or not. Though, if you're outside any enclosure, dropping something into lunar regolith and immediately putting it on your tongue, you probably have a lot higher concerns than the food content... such as where did your helmet go, and where are you going to get your next breath. If you're in an enclosure, you're left with the question of why there's lunar regolith there and how it's getting indoors.
    $endgroup$
    – liljoshu
    Mar 27 at 17:52







2




2




$begingroup$
IIRC, day side gets to over 200° F. Might be more concerned about burning your tongue.
$endgroup$
– A C
Mar 26 at 20:20




$begingroup$
IIRC, day side gets to over 200° F. Might be more concerned about burning your tongue.
$endgroup$
– A C
Mar 26 at 20:20












$begingroup$
Also true. I'll update the answer.
$endgroup$
– liljoshu
Mar 26 at 20:40




$begingroup$
Also true. I'll update the answer.
$endgroup$
– liljoshu
Mar 26 at 20:40




4




4




$begingroup$
How much heat capacity is in lunar regolith? Without atmosphere, the ground is going to cool from the sandwich and stop burning it. And especially if it's loose material, it's not going to conduct well.
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
Mar 27 at 9:21




$begingroup$
How much heat capacity is in lunar regolith? Without atmosphere, the ground is going to cool from the sandwich and stop burning it. And especially if it's loose material, it's not going to conduct well.
$endgroup$
– John Dvorak
Mar 27 at 9:21




1




1




$begingroup$
When I drop food onto a rock, I pick up the food not the rock. The rock is unable to break my teeth. When I drop food onto sand, I pick up the food with a little sand. The food tastes horrible, but it still doesn't break my teeth. As for flash frozen, this all depends on exactly what the food is; you're assuming that it's got a high water content; would be eaten at earth rtp and you're in the dark on the moon - but even if that's the case people eat ice cream all the time without breaking their teeth.
$endgroup$
– UKMonkey
Mar 27 at 15:59




$begingroup$
When I drop food onto a rock, I pick up the food not the rock. The rock is unable to break my teeth. When I drop food onto sand, I pick up the food with a little sand. The food tastes horrible, but it still doesn't break my teeth. As for flash frozen, this all depends on exactly what the food is; you're assuming that it's got a high water content; would be eaten at earth rtp and you're in the dark on the moon - but even if that's the case people eat ice cream all the time without breaking their teeth.
$endgroup$
– UKMonkey
Mar 27 at 15:59




1




1




$begingroup$
Depends a lot on the scenario. Vacuum doesn't transmit heat, so it's going to be a lot closer to its last state. So we have a question of if you're inside a contained atmosphere somehow or not. Though, if you're outside any enclosure, dropping something into lunar regolith and immediately putting it on your tongue, you probably have a lot higher concerns than the food content... such as where did your helmet go, and where are you going to get your next breath. If you're in an enclosure, you're left with the question of why there's lunar regolith there and how it's getting indoors.
$endgroup$
– liljoshu
Mar 27 at 17:52




$begingroup$
Depends a lot on the scenario. Vacuum doesn't transmit heat, so it's going to be a lot closer to its last state. So we have a question of if you're inside a contained atmosphere somehow or not. Though, if you're outside any enclosure, dropping something into lunar regolith and immediately putting it on your tongue, you probably have a lot higher concerns than the food content... such as where did your helmet go, and where are you going to get your next breath. If you're in an enclosure, you're left with the question of why there's lunar regolith there and how it's getting indoors.
$endgroup$
– liljoshu
Mar 27 at 17:52

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142424%2fis-there-any-reason-not-to-eat-food-thats-been-dropped-on-the-surface-of-the-mo%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Adding axes to figuresAdding axes labels to LaTeX figuresLaTeX equivalent of ConTeXt buffersRotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?adding axes to shapesAlign axes across subfiguresAdding figures with a certain orderLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themAdding axes labels to LaTeX figures

Tähtien Talli Jäsenet | Lähteet | NavigointivalikkoSuomen Hippos – Tähtien Talli

Do these cracks on my tires look bad? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowDry rot tire should I replace?Having to replace tiresFishtailed so easily? Bad tires? ABS?Filling the tires with something other than air, to avoid puncture hassles?Used Michelin tires safe to install?Do these tyre cracks necessitate replacement?Rumbling noise: tires or mechanicalIs it possible to fix noisy feathered tires?Are bad winter tires still better than summer tires in winter?Torque converter failure - Related to replacing only 2 tires?Why use snow tires on all 4 wheels on 2-wheel-drive cars?