Test whether all array elements are factors of a numberSearching array reports “not found” even though it's foundPHP: Delete an element from an arrayDeleting array elements in JavaScript - delete vs spliceWhy is setTimeout(fn, 0) sometimes useful?How do I determine whether an array contains a particular value in Java?Determine whether an array contains a valueGet the first element of an arrayGet all unique values in a JavaScript array (remove duplicates)How do I remove a particular element from an array in JavaScript?How can I add new array elements at the beginning of an array in Javascript?How does PHP 'foreach' actually work?

What happens in the secondary winding if there's no spark plug connected?

What to do with someone that cheated their way through university and a PhD program?

Contradiction proof for inequality of P and NP?

Multiple options vs single option UI

Can SQL Server create collisions in system generated constraint names?

How does Captain America channel this power?

Is it idiomatic to construct against `this`

Why did C use the -> operator instead of reusing the . operator?

How can Republicans who favour free markets, consistently express anger when they don't like the outcome of that choice?

Big O /Right or wrong?

Why does nature favour the Laplacian?

Thesis on avalanche prediction using One Class SVM

constexpr member function with std::vector data member in C++

Why do games have consumables?

Pulling the rope with one hand is as heavy as with two hands?

How much cash can I safely carry into the USA and avoid civil forfeiture?

Is there a way to generate a list of distinct numbers such that no two subsets ever have an equal sum?

What makes accurate emulation of old systems a difficult task?

How to pronounce 'c++' in Spanish

Don’t seats that recline flat defeat the purpose of having seatbelts?

Cyclomatic Complexity reduction JS

What term is being referred to with "reflected-sound-of-underground-spirits"?

Pre-plastic human skin alternative

Do I have an "anti-research" personality?



Test whether all array elements are factors of a number


Searching array reports “not found” even though it's foundPHP: Delete an element from an arrayDeleting array elements in JavaScript - delete vs spliceWhy is setTimeout(fn, 0) sometimes useful?How do I determine whether an array contains a particular value in Java?Determine whether an array contains a valueGet the first element of an arrayGet all unique values in a JavaScript array (remove duplicates)How do I remove a particular element from an array in JavaScript?How can I add new array elements at the beginning of an array in Javascript?How does PHP 'foreach' actually work?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








7















I have the following question:




Write a function that returns true if all integers in an array are factors of a number, and false otherwise.




I tried the code below:






function checkFactors(factors, num) 

for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
let element = factors[i];
console.log(element)

if (num % element !== 0)
return false

else
return true




console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false





My solution returns true which is wrong. I know it's the else statement that's messing it up. But I want to understand why the else statement can't go there.










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    You should get the return true out of the loop ;) and leave the return false inside the loop :) The reason for it is that otherwise your loop really stops after the first checking, returning either true or false, and you want it to return false as soon as something is not a factor. The return true outside of the loop would then indicate that all numbers supplied where factors of the number argument

    – Icepickle
    Apr 6 at 13:07







  • 2





    FYI, it's not just you, this is one of the most common errors people make when they first start out with programming and loops. :-)

    – T.J. Crowder
    Apr 6 at 13:09






  • 1





    @t.j.crowder yet we don't have a good dupetarget for it.

    – Jonas Wilms
    Apr 6 at 13:14






  • 2





    @JonasWilms - Yeah, I bookmarked this one on the basis that there isn't a lot of extraneous stuff, it really is just the earlier return thing. :-)

    – T.J. Crowder
    Apr 6 at 13:18











  • @T.J.Crowder stackoverflow.com/questions/42913798/… is the general dupe I wrote for this class of problems.

    – Barmar
    Apr 6 at 18:43


















7















I have the following question:




Write a function that returns true if all integers in an array are factors of a number, and false otherwise.




I tried the code below:






function checkFactors(factors, num) 

for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
let element = factors[i];
console.log(element)

if (num % element !== 0)
return false

else
return true




console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false





My solution returns true which is wrong. I know it's the else statement that's messing it up. But I want to understand why the else statement can't go there.










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    You should get the return true out of the loop ;) and leave the return false inside the loop :) The reason for it is that otherwise your loop really stops after the first checking, returning either true or false, and you want it to return false as soon as something is not a factor. The return true outside of the loop would then indicate that all numbers supplied where factors of the number argument

    – Icepickle
    Apr 6 at 13:07







  • 2





    FYI, it's not just you, this is one of the most common errors people make when they first start out with programming and loops. :-)

    – T.J. Crowder
    Apr 6 at 13:09






  • 1





    @t.j.crowder yet we don't have a good dupetarget for it.

    – Jonas Wilms
    Apr 6 at 13:14






  • 2





    @JonasWilms - Yeah, I bookmarked this one on the basis that there isn't a lot of extraneous stuff, it really is just the earlier return thing. :-)

    – T.J. Crowder
    Apr 6 at 13:18











  • @T.J.Crowder stackoverflow.com/questions/42913798/… is the general dupe I wrote for this class of problems.

    – Barmar
    Apr 6 at 18:43














7












7








7


1






I have the following question:




Write a function that returns true if all integers in an array are factors of a number, and false otherwise.




I tried the code below:






function checkFactors(factors, num) 

for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
let element = factors[i];
console.log(element)

if (num % element !== 0)
return false

else
return true




console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false





My solution returns true which is wrong. I know it's the else statement that's messing it up. But I want to understand why the else statement can't go there.










share|improve this question
















I have the following question:




Write a function that returns true if all integers in an array are factors of a number, and false otherwise.




I tried the code below:






function checkFactors(factors, num) 

for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
let element = factors[i];
console.log(element)

if (num % element !== 0)
return false

else
return true




console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false





My solution returns true which is wrong. I know it's the else statement that's messing it up. But I want to understand why the else statement can't go there.






function checkFactors(factors, num) 

for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
let element = factors[i];
console.log(element)

if (num % element !== 0)
return false

else
return true




console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false





function checkFactors(factors, num) 

for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
let element = factors[i];
console.log(element)

if (num % element !== 0)
return false

else
return true




console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false






javascript arrays loops if-statement






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 6 at 16:50









isanae

2,55511437




2,55511437










asked Apr 6 at 13:04









PineNuts0PineNuts0

90531432




90531432







  • 2





    You should get the return true out of the loop ;) and leave the return false inside the loop :) The reason for it is that otherwise your loop really stops after the first checking, returning either true or false, and you want it to return false as soon as something is not a factor. The return true outside of the loop would then indicate that all numbers supplied where factors of the number argument

    – Icepickle
    Apr 6 at 13:07







  • 2





    FYI, it's not just you, this is one of the most common errors people make when they first start out with programming and loops. :-)

    – T.J. Crowder
    Apr 6 at 13:09






  • 1





    @t.j.crowder yet we don't have a good dupetarget for it.

    – Jonas Wilms
    Apr 6 at 13:14






  • 2





    @JonasWilms - Yeah, I bookmarked this one on the basis that there isn't a lot of extraneous stuff, it really is just the earlier return thing. :-)

    – T.J. Crowder
    Apr 6 at 13:18











  • @T.J.Crowder stackoverflow.com/questions/42913798/… is the general dupe I wrote for this class of problems.

    – Barmar
    Apr 6 at 18:43













  • 2





    You should get the return true out of the loop ;) and leave the return false inside the loop :) The reason for it is that otherwise your loop really stops after the first checking, returning either true or false, and you want it to return false as soon as something is not a factor. The return true outside of the loop would then indicate that all numbers supplied where factors of the number argument

    – Icepickle
    Apr 6 at 13:07







  • 2





    FYI, it's not just you, this is one of the most common errors people make when they first start out with programming and loops. :-)

    – T.J. Crowder
    Apr 6 at 13:09






  • 1





    @t.j.crowder yet we don't have a good dupetarget for it.

    – Jonas Wilms
    Apr 6 at 13:14






  • 2





    @JonasWilms - Yeah, I bookmarked this one on the basis that there isn't a lot of extraneous stuff, it really is just the earlier return thing. :-)

    – T.J. Crowder
    Apr 6 at 13:18











  • @T.J.Crowder stackoverflow.com/questions/42913798/… is the general dupe I wrote for this class of problems.

    – Barmar
    Apr 6 at 18:43








2




2





You should get the return true out of the loop ;) and leave the return false inside the loop :) The reason for it is that otherwise your loop really stops after the first checking, returning either true or false, and you want it to return false as soon as something is not a factor. The return true outside of the loop would then indicate that all numbers supplied where factors of the number argument

– Icepickle
Apr 6 at 13:07






You should get the return true out of the loop ;) and leave the return false inside the loop :) The reason for it is that otherwise your loop really stops after the first checking, returning either true or false, and you want it to return false as soon as something is not a factor. The return true outside of the loop would then indicate that all numbers supplied where factors of the number argument

– Icepickle
Apr 6 at 13:07





2




2





FYI, it's not just you, this is one of the most common errors people make when they first start out with programming and loops. :-)

– T.J. Crowder
Apr 6 at 13:09





FYI, it's not just you, this is one of the most common errors people make when they first start out with programming and loops. :-)

– T.J. Crowder
Apr 6 at 13:09




1




1





@t.j.crowder yet we don't have a good dupetarget for it.

– Jonas Wilms
Apr 6 at 13:14





@t.j.crowder yet we don't have a good dupetarget for it.

– Jonas Wilms
Apr 6 at 13:14




2




2





@JonasWilms - Yeah, I bookmarked this one on the basis that there isn't a lot of extraneous stuff, it really is just the earlier return thing. :-)

– T.J. Crowder
Apr 6 at 13:18





@JonasWilms - Yeah, I bookmarked this one on the basis that there isn't a lot of extraneous stuff, it really is just the earlier return thing. :-)

– T.J. Crowder
Apr 6 at 13:18













@T.J.Crowder stackoverflow.com/questions/42913798/… is the general dupe I wrote for this class of problems.

– Barmar
Apr 6 at 18:43






@T.J.Crowder stackoverflow.com/questions/42913798/… is the general dupe I wrote for this class of problems.

– Barmar
Apr 6 at 18:43













5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















5














Just place return true out of for loop,



If you keep return true in else part as soon as any of value which does not satisfies num % element !== 0 your code will return true which should not happen in this case as you're checking for all the values in array should be factor of given number




Let's understand by 1st example




  • On first element in array 1 it will check if condition num % element !== 0 which turns out false, so it will go to else condition and return true from function and will not check for rest of values.

  • So you need to keep return true at the end so if any of the value in loop doesn't satisfy the if condition than only control will go to return true




function checkFactors(factors, num) 

for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
let element = factors[i];
if (num % element !== 0)
return false


return true




console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false
console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2))






In short - In such case where you want all of them must match a condition as a thumb rule you can consider it like




  1. keep the failing case return value inside for loop

  2. keep the passing case return value at the end of function

JS have a inbuilt method Array.every for such cases






function checkFactors(factors, num) 
return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));








share|improve this answer
































    7














    You are working in a chocolate store, and your boss tells you to check wether all chocolates (there are chili chocolate, caramel chocolate and coffee chocolate) are delicious. He tells you the following:



    Go through all chocolates, and for each chocolate, taste it, if it is fine, tell me that everything is fine, otherwise tell me that something is wrong¹



    You start with the first chocolate, which is chili chocolate, it tastes delucious, you go to your boss and tell him that everything is fine. Your boss yells at you because you haven't tasted the caramel chocolate and the coffee chocolate yet.



    You realize that your boss actually wanted you to do:



    Go through the chocolates, for each chocolate, taste it, if it doesnt taste well tell, tell me immeadiately, otherwise continue until you tasted them all, then return to me and tell me that everything is fine.²



    Or in code:



     // ¹
    function checkChocolates(chocolates)
    for(const chocolate of chocolates)
    if(isTasty(chocolate))
    return true;
    else
    return false;




    // ²
    function checkChocolates(chocolates)
    for(const chocolate of chocolates)
    if(isTasty(chocolate))
    continue; // this could be omitted, as a loop keeps looping nevertheless
    else
    return false;


    return true;



    As this is a very common task in programming, there is already a shorter way to express this:



     if(chocolates.every(isTasty)) 
    alert("all chocolates are fine");
    else
    alert("Oh, that doesnt taste good");



    whereas isTasty is a function taking a chocolate and returning either true or false.




    If you didn't grasp it yet, just try it out! Buy some chocolate, and taste it! If someone tells you "eating choclate isn't learning", respond with "I'm doing rubber duck debugging" and no one can complain :)






    share|improve this answer




















    • 1





      A tiny quibble - it's "chocolate", not "choclate".

      – Wai Ha Lee
      Apr 6 at 13:25






    • 1





      @waiHaLee oh, pronounciation tricked me ...

      – Jonas Wilms
      Apr 6 at 13:28


















    1














    Inside the loop the input num was was tested for divisibility, if the num was divisible the control was going in the else block from where the function returned true.



    The loop was not checking for all numbers of the input array it was returning true when the first number was divisible.



    Just use a flag variable to see if all of the elements are divisible by the input number num, if any one is not divisible the flag will set to false and then we can break out of the loop and return it as there is no point to check the other numbers.






    function checkFactors(factors, num) 
    let flag = true;
    for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
    let element = factors[i];
    if (num % element !== 0)
    flag = false;
    break;


    return flag;


    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
    console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
    console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
    console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));





    You can also use Array.every to check the same in a concise way:






    function checkFactors(factors, num) 
    return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
    console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
    console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
    console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));








    share|improve this answer
































      0














      Yes, "else" causing the issue. I removed it and added "return true" outside of for loop.



      function checkFactors(factors, num) 

      for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
      let element = factors[i];
      console.log(element)

      if (num % element !== 0)
      return false


      return true;






      share|improve this answer


















      • 1





        He is looking for an explanation as well though

        – Icepickle
        Apr 6 at 13:10











      • I see Icepickle has explained in the question comments nicely! Jonas Wilms's answer too.

        – javapedia.net
        Apr 6 at 13:12



















      0














      Your code's logic is wrong. You should check all the array's Elements, if all elements satisfy the condition, return true, but if one of them not satisfy the condition, return false immediately. The else means one item satisfy the condition, but not all elements. That's where the problem is.






      share|improve this answer























        Your Answer






        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
        StackExchange.snippets.init();
        );
        );
        , "code-snippets");

        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "1"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );













        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55549338%2ftest-whether-all-array-elements-are-factors-of-a-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        5 Answers
        5






        active

        oldest

        votes








        5 Answers
        5






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        5














        Just place return true out of for loop,



        If you keep return true in else part as soon as any of value which does not satisfies num % element !== 0 your code will return true which should not happen in this case as you're checking for all the values in array should be factor of given number




        Let's understand by 1st example




        • On first element in array 1 it will check if condition num % element !== 0 which turns out false, so it will go to else condition and return true from function and will not check for rest of values.

        • So you need to keep return true at the end so if any of the value in loop doesn't satisfy the if condition than only control will go to return true




        function checkFactors(factors, num) 

        for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
        let element = factors[i];
        if (num % element !== 0)
        return false


        return true




        console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false
        console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2))






        In short - In such case where you want all of them must match a condition as a thumb rule you can consider it like




        1. keep the failing case return value inside for loop

        2. keep the passing case return value at the end of function

        JS have a inbuilt method Array.every for such cases






        function checkFactors(factors, num) 
        return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

        console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
        console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));








        share|improve this answer





























          5














          Just place return true out of for loop,



          If you keep return true in else part as soon as any of value which does not satisfies num % element !== 0 your code will return true which should not happen in this case as you're checking for all the values in array should be factor of given number




          Let's understand by 1st example




          • On first element in array 1 it will check if condition num % element !== 0 which turns out false, so it will go to else condition and return true from function and will not check for rest of values.

          • So you need to keep return true at the end so if any of the value in loop doesn't satisfy the if condition than only control will go to return true




          function checkFactors(factors, num) 

          for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
          let element = factors[i];
          if (num % element !== 0)
          return false


          return true




          console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false
          console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2))






          In short - In such case where you want all of them must match a condition as a thumb rule you can consider it like




          1. keep the failing case return value inside for loop

          2. keep the passing case return value at the end of function

          JS have a inbuilt method Array.every for such cases






          function checkFactors(factors, num) 
          return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

          console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
          console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));








          share|improve this answer



























            5












            5








            5







            Just place return true out of for loop,



            If you keep return true in else part as soon as any of value which does not satisfies num % element !== 0 your code will return true which should not happen in this case as you're checking for all the values in array should be factor of given number




            Let's understand by 1st example




            • On first element in array 1 it will check if condition num % element !== 0 which turns out false, so it will go to else condition and return true from function and will not check for rest of values.

            • So you need to keep return true at the end so if any of the value in loop doesn't satisfy the if condition than only control will go to return true




            function checkFactors(factors, num) 

            for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
            let element = factors[i];
            if (num % element !== 0)
            return false


            return true




            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false
            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2))






            In short - In such case where you want all of them must match a condition as a thumb rule you can consider it like




            1. keep the failing case return value inside for loop

            2. keep the passing case return value at the end of function

            JS have a inbuilt method Array.every for such cases






            function checkFactors(factors, num) 
            return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));








            share|improve this answer















            Just place return true out of for loop,



            If you keep return true in else part as soon as any of value which does not satisfies num % element !== 0 your code will return true which should not happen in this case as you're checking for all the values in array should be factor of given number




            Let's understand by 1st example




            • On first element in array 1 it will check if condition num % element !== 0 which turns out false, so it will go to else condition and return true from function and will not check for rest of values.

            • So you need to keep return true at the end so if any of the value in loop doesn't satisfy the if condition than only control will go to return true




            function checkFactors(factors, num) 

            for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
            let element = factors[i];
            if (num % element !== 0)
            return false


            return true




            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false
            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2))






            In short - In such case where you want all of them must match a condition as a thumb rule you can consider it like




            1. keep the failing case return value inside for loop

            2. keep the passing case return value at the end of function

            JS have a inbuilt method Array.every for such cases






            function checkFactors(factors, num) 
            return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));








            function checkFactors(factors, num) 

            for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
            let element = factors[i];
            if (num % element !== 0)
            return false


            return true




            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false
            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2))





            function checkFactors(factors, num) 

            for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
            let element = factors[i];
            if (num % element !== 0)
            return false


            return true




            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false
            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2))





            function checkFactors(factors, num) 
            return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));





            function checkFactors(factors, num) 
            return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));






            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Apr 6 at 16:22

























            answered Apr 6 at 13:07









            Code ManiacCode Maniac

            13.1k21034




            13.1k21034























                7














                You are working in a chocolate store, and your boss tells you to check wether all chocolates (there are chili chocolate, caramel chocolate and coffee chocolate) are delicious. He tells you the following:



                Go through all chocolates, and for each chocolate, taste it, if it is fine, tell me that everything is fine, otherwise tell me that something is wrong¹



                You start with the first chocolate, which is chili chocolate, it tastes delucious, you go to your boss and tell him that everything is fine. Your boss yells at you because you haven't tasted the caramel chocolate and the coffee chocolate yet.



                You realize that your boss actually wanted you to do:



                Go through the chocolates, for each chocolate, taste it, if it doesnt taste well tell, tell me immeadiately, otherwise continue until you tasted them all, then return to me and tell me that everything is fine.²



                Or in code:



                 // ¹
                function checkChocolates(chocolates)
                for(const chocolate of chocolates)
                if(isTasty(chocolate))
                return true;
                else
                return false;




                // ²
                function checkChocolates(chocolates)
                for(const chocolate of chocolates)
                if(isTasty(chocolate))
                continue; // this could be omitted, as a loop keeps looping nevertheless
                else
                return false;


                return true;



                As this is a very common task in programming, there is already a shorter way to express this:



                 if(chocolates.every(isTasty)) 
                alert("all chocolates are fine");
                else
                alert("Oh, that doesnt taste good");



                whereas isTasty is a function taking a chocolate and returning either true or false.




                If you didn't grasp it yet, just try it out! Buy some chocolate, and taste it! If someone tells you "eating choclate isn't learning", respond with "I'm doing rubber duck debugging" and no one can complain :)






                share|improve this answer




















                • 1





                  A tiny quibble - it's "chocolate", not "choclate".

                  – Wai Ha Lee
                  Apr 6 at 13:25






                • 1





                  @waiHaLee oh, pronounciation tricked me ...

                  – Jonas Wilms
                  Apr 6 at 13:28















                7














                You are working in a chocolate store, and your boss tells you to check wether all chocolates (there are chili chocolate, caramel chocolate and coffee chocolate) are delicious. He tells you the following:



                Go through all chocolates, and for each chocolate, taste it, if it is fine, tell me that everything is fine, otherwise tell me that something is wrong¹



                You start with the first chocolate, which is chili chocolate, it tastes delucious, you go to your boss and tell him that everything is fine. Your boss yells at you because you haven't tasted the caramel chocolate and the coffee chocolate yet.



                You realize that your boss actually wanted you to do:



                Go through the chocolates, for each chocolate, taste it, if it doesnt taste well tell, tell me immeadiately, otherwise continue until you tasted them all, then return to me and tell me that everything is fine.²



                Or in code:



                 // ¹
                function checkChocolates(chocolates)
                for(const chocolate of chocolates)
                if(isTasty(chocolate))
                return true;
                else
                return false;




                // ²
                function checkChocolates(chocolates)
                for(const chocolate of chocolates)
                if(isTasty(chocolate))
                continue; // this could be omitted, as a loop keeps looping nevertheless
                else
                return false;


                return true;



                As this is a very common task in programming, there is already a shorter way to express this:



                 if(chocolates.every(isTasty)) 
                alert("all chocolates are fine");
                else
                alert("Oh, that doesnt taste good");



                whereas isTasty is a function taking a chocolate and returning either true or false.




                If you didn't grasp it yet, just try it out! Buy some chocolate, and taste it! If someone tells you "eating choclate isn't learning", respond with "I'm doing rubber duck debugging" and no one can complain :)






                share|improve this answer




















                • 1





                  A tiny quibble - it's "chocolate", not "choclate".

                  – Wai Ha Lee
                  Apr 6 at 13:25






                • 1





                  @waiHaLee oh, pronounciation tricked me ...

                  – Jonas Wilms
                  Apr 6 at 13:28













                7












                7








                7







                You are working in a chocolate store, and your boss tells you to check wether all chocolates (there are chili chocolate, caramel chocolate and coffee chocolate) are delicious. He tells you the following:



                Go through all chocolates, and for each chocolate, taste it, if it is fine, tell me that everything is fine, otherwise tell me that something is wrong¹



                You start with the first chocolate, which is chili chocolate, it tastes delucious, you go to your boss and tell him that everything is fine. Your boss yells at you because you haven't tasted the caramel chocolate and the coffee chocolate yet.



                You realize that your boss actually wanted you to do:



                Go through the chocolates, for each chocolate, taste it, if it doesnt taste well tell, tell me immeadiately, otherwise continue until you tasted them all, then return to me and tell me that everything is fine.²



                Or in code:



                 // ¹
                function checkChocolates(chocolates)
                for(const chocolate of chocolates)
                if(isTasty(chocolate))
                return true;
                else
                return false;




                // ²
                function checkChocolates(chocolates)
                for(const chocolate of chocolates)
                if(isTasty(chocolate))
                continue; // this could be omitted, as a loop keeps looping nevertheless
                else
                return false;


                return true;



                As this is a very common task in programming, there is already a shorter way to express this:



                 if(chocolates.every(isTasty)) 
                alert("all chocolates are fine");
                else
                alert("Oh, that doesnt taste good");



                whereas isTasty is a function taking a chocolate and returning either true or false.




                If you didn't grasp it yet, just try it out! Buy some chocolate, and taste it! If someone tells you "eating choclate isn't learning", respond with "I'm doing rubber duck debugging" and no one can complain :)






                share|improve this answer















                You are working in a chocolate store, and your boss tells you to check wether all chocolates (there are chili chocolate, caramel chocolate and coffee chocolate) are delicious. He tells you the following:



                Go through all chocolates, and for each chocolate, taste it, if it is fine, tell me that everything is fine, otherwise tell me that something is wrong¹



                You start with the first chocolate, which is chili chocolate, it tastes delucious, you go to your boss and tell him that everything is fine. Your boss yells at you because you haven't tasted the caramel chocolate and the coffee chocolate yet.



                You realize that your boss actually wanted you to do:



                Go through the chocolates, for each chocolate, taste it, if it doesnt taste well tell, tell me immeadiately, otherwise continue until you tasted them all, then return to me and tell me that everything is fine.²



                Or in code:



                 // ¹
                function checkChocolates(chocolates)
                for(const chocolate of chocolates)
                if(isTasty(chocolate))
                return true;
                else
                return false;




                // ²
                function checkChocolates(chocolates)
                for(const chocolate of chocolates)
                if(isTasty(chocolate))
                continue; // this could be omitted, as a loop keeps looping nevertheless
                else
                return false;


                return true;



                As this is a very common task in programming, there is already a shorter way to express this:



                 if(chocolates.every(isTasty)) 
                alert("all chocolates are fine");
                else
                alert("Oh, that doesnt taste good");



                whereas isTasty is a function taking a chocolate and returning either true or false.




                If you didn't grasp it yet, just try it out! Buy some chocolate, and taste it! If someone tells you "eating choclate isn't learning", respond with "I'm doing rubber duck debugging" and no one can complain :)







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Apr 6 at 13:31

























                answered Apr 6 at 13:10









                Jonas WilmsJonas Wilms

                68k53762




                68k53762







                • 1





                  A tiny quibble - it's "chocolate", not "choclate".

                  – Wai Ha Lee
                  Apr 6 at 13:25






                • 1





                  @waiHaLee oh, pronounciation tricked me ...

                  – Jonas Wilms
                  Apr 6 at 13:28












                • 1





                  A tiny quibble - it's "chocolate", not "choclate".

                  – Wai Ha Lee
                  Apr 6 at 13:25






                • 1





                  @waiHaLee oh, pronounciation tricked me ...

                  – Jonas Wilms
                  Apr 6 at 13:28







                1




                1





                A tiny quibble - it's "chocolate", not "choclate".

                – Wai Ha Lee
                Apr 6 at 13:25





                A tiny quibble - it's "chocolate", not "choclate".

                – Wai Ha Lee
                Apr 6 at 13:25




                1




                1





                @waiHaLee oh, pronounciation tricked me ...

                – Jonas Wilms
                Apr 6 at 13:28





                @waiHaLee oh, pronounciation tricked me ...

                – Jonas Wilms
                Apr 6 at 13:28











                1














                Inside the loop the input num was was tested for divisibility, if the num was divisible the control was going in the else block from where the function returned true.



                The loop was not checking for all numbers of the input array it was returning true when the first number was divisible.



                Just use a flag variable to see if all of the elements are divisible by the input number num, if any one is not divisible the flag will set to false and then we can break out of the loop and return it as there is no point to check the other numbers.






                function checkFactors(factors, num) 
                let flag = true;
                for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
                let element = factors[i];
                if (num % element !== 0)
                flag = false;
                break;


                return flag;


                console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
                console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
                console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
                console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
                console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));





                You can also use Array.every to check the same in a concise way:






                function checkFactors(factors, num) 
                return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

                console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
                console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
                console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
                console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
                console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));








                share|improve this answer





























                  1














                  Inside the loop the input num was was tested for divisibility, if the num was divisible the control was going in the else block from where the function returned true.



                  The loop was not checking for all numbers of the input array it was returning true when the first number was divisible.



                  Just use a flag variable to see if all of the elements are divisible by the input number num, if any one is not divisible the flag will set to false and then we can break out of the loop and return it as there is no point to check the other numbers.






                  function checkFactors(factors, num) 
                  let flag = true;
                  for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
                  let element = factors[i];
                  if (num % element !== 0)
                  flag = false;
                  break;


                  return flag;


                  console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
                  console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
                  console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
                  console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
                  console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));





                  You can also use Array.every to check the same in a concise way:






                  function checkFactors(factors, num) 
                  return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

                  console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
                  console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
                  console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
                  console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
                  console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));








                  share|improve this answer



























                    1












                    1








                    1







                    Inside the loop the input num was was tested for divisibility, if the num was divisible the control was going in the else block from where the function returned true.



                    The loop was not checking for all numbers of the input array it was returning true when the first number was divisible.



                    Just use a flag variable to see if all of the elements are divisible by the input number num, if any one is not divisible the flag will set to false and then we can break out of the loop and return it as there is no point to check the other numbers.






                    function checkFactors(factors, num) 
                    let flag = true;
                    for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
                    let element = factors[i];
                    if (num % element !== 0)
                    flag = false;
                    break;


                    return flag;


                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
                    console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
                    console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));





                    You can also use Array.every to check the same in a concise way:






                    function checkFactors(factors, num) 
                    return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
                    console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
                    console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));








                    share|improve this answer















                    Inside the loop the input num was was tested for divisibility, if the num was divisible the control was going in the else block from where the function returned true.



                    The loop was not checking for all numbers of the input array it was returning true when the first number was divisible.



                    Just use a flag variable to see if all of the elements are divisible by the input number num, if any one is not divisible the flag will set to false and then we can break out of the loop and return it as there is no point to check the other numbers.






                    function checkFactors(factors, num) 
                    let flag = true;
                    for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
                    let element = factors[i];
                    if (num % element !== 0)
                    flag = false;
                    break;


                    return flag;


                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
                    console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
                    console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));





                    You can also use Array.every to check the same in a concise way:






                    function checkFactors(factors, num) 
                    return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
                    console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
                    console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));








                    function checkFactors(factors, num) 
                    let flag = true;
                    for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
                    let element = factors[i];
                    if (num % element !== 0)
                    flag = false;
                    break;


                    return flag;


                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
                    console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
                    console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));





                    function checkFactors(factors, num) 
                    let flag = true;
                    for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
                    let element = factors[i];
                    if (num % element !== 0)
                    flag = false;
                    break;


                    return flag;


                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
                    console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
                    console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));





                    function checkFactors(factors, num) 
                    return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
                    console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
                    console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));





                    function checkFactors(factors, num) 
                    return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
                    console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
                    console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));






                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Apr 6 at 13:29

























                    answered Apr 6 at 13:12









                    Amardeep BhowmickAmardeep Bhowmick

                    6,45121231




                    6,45121231





















                        0














                        Yes, "else" causing the issue. I removed it and added "return true" outside of for loop.



                        function checkFactors(factors, num) 

                        for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
                        let element = factors[i];
                        console.log(element)

                        if (num % element !== 0)
                        return false


                        return true;






                        share|improve this answer


















                        • 1





                          He is looking for an explanation as well though

                          – Icepickle
                          Apr 6 at 13:10











                        • I see Icepickle has explained in the question comments nicely! Jonas Wilms's answer too.

                          – javapedia.net
                          Apr 6 at 13:12
















                        0














                        Yes, "else" causing the issue. I removed it and added "return true" outside of for loop.



                        function checkFactors(factors, num) 

                        for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
                        let element = factors[i];
                        console.log(element)

                        if (num % element !== 0)
                        return false


                        return true;






                        share|improve this answer


















                        • 1





                          He is looking for an explanation as well though

                          – Icepickle
                          Apr 6 at 13:10











                        • I see Icepickle has explained in the question comments nicely! Jonas Wilms's answer too.

                          – javapedia.net
                          Apr 6 at 13:12














                        0












                        0








                        0







                        Yes, "else" causing the issue. I removed it and added "return true" outside of for loop.



                        function checkFactors(factors, num) 

                        for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
                        let element = factors[i];
                        console.log(element)

                        if (num % element !== 0)
                        return false


                        return true;






                        share|improve this answer













                        Yes, "else" causing the issue. I removed it and added "return true" outside of for loop.



                        function checkFactors(factors, num) 

                        for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
                        let element = factors[i];
                        console.log(element)

                        if (num % element !== 0)
                        return false


                        return true;







                        share|improve this answer












                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer










                        answered Apr 6 at 13:08









                        javapedia.netjavapedia.net

                        594315




                        594315







                        • 1





                          He is looking for an explanation as well though

                          – Icepickle
                          Apr 6 at 13:10











                        • I see Icepickle has explained in the question comments nicely! Jonas Wilms's answer too.

                          – javapedia.net
                          Apr 6 at 13:12













                        • 1





                          He is looking for an explanation as well though

                          – Icepickle
                          Apr 6 at 13:10











                        • I see Icepickle has explained in the question comments nicely! Jonas Wilms's answer too.

                          – javapedia.net
                          Apr 6 at 13:12








                        1




                        1





                        He is looking for an explanation as well though

                        – Icepickle
                        Apr 6 at 13:10





                        He is looking for an explanation as well though

                        – Icepickle
                        Apr 6 at 13:10













                        I see Icepickle has explained in the question comments nicely! Jonas Wilms's answer too.

                        – javapedia.net
                        Apr 6 at 13:12






                        I see Icepickle has explained in the question comments nicely! Jonas Wilms's answer too.

                        – javapedia.net
                        Apr 6 at 13:12












                        0














                        Your code's logic is wrong. You should check all the array's Elements, if all elements satisfy the condition, return true, but if one of them not satisfy the condition, return false immediately. The else means one item satisfy the condition, but not all elements. That's where the problem is.






                        share|improve this answer



























                          0














                          Your code's logic is wrong. You should check all the array's Elements, if all elements satisfy the condition, return true, but if one of them not satisfy the condition, return false immediately. The else means one item satisfy the condition, but not all elements. That's where the problem is.






                          share|improve this answer

























                            0












                            0








                            0







                            Your code's logic is wrong. You should check all the array's Elements, if all elements satisfy the condition, return true, but if one of them not satisfy the condition, return false immediately. The else means one item satisfy the condition, but not all elements. That's where the problem is.






                            share|improve this answer













                            Your code's logic is wrong. You should check all the array's Elements, if all elements satisfy the condition, return true, but if one of them not satisfy the condition, return false immediately. The else means one item satisfy the condition, but not all elements. That's where the problem is.







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered Apr 6 at 13:26









                            W.BrightW.Bright

                            133




                            133



























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded
















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55549338%2ftest-whether-all-array-elements-are-factors-of-a-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Adding axes to figuresAdding axes labels to LaTeX figuresLaTeX equivalent of ConTeXt buffersRotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?adding axes to shapesAlign axes across subfiguresAdding figures with a certain orderLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themAdding axes labels to LaTeX figures

                                Tähtien Talli Jäsenet | Lähteet | NavigointivalikkoSuomen Hippos – Tähtien Talli

                                Do these cracks on my tires look bad? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowDry rot tire should I replace?Having to replace tiresFishtailed so easily? Bad tires? ABS?Filling the tires with something other than air, to avoid puncture hassles?Used Michelin tires safe to install?Do these tyre cracks necessitate replacement?Rumbling noise: tires or mechanicalIs it possible to fix noisy feathered tires?Are bad winter tires still better than summer tires in winter?Torque converter failure - Related to replacing only 2 tires?Why use snow tires on all 4 wheels on 2-wheel-drive cars?