What do three bars across the stem of a note mean?How to read this measure of music with “in between” notes?Over/under pitch noteSame number above notes in violin sheetHow to play eighths (quavers) interspersed only with quarter notes (crotchets) in swing timeIs this small note played at the same time as the regular-sized note?How to clearly notate tuplets, both “simple” and “complex,” in irregular metersDo note lengths matter when they have l.v. ties?How to rewrite this rhythm from common time to 12/8 time?How do I interpret two notes in a tempo marking?When and how to use finger and position markings?

"Whatever a Russian does, they end up making the Kalashnikov gun"? Are there any similar proverbs in English?

How to fry ground beef so it is well-browned

Why does Mind Blank stop the Feeblemind spell?

Farming on the moon

Could the terminal length of components like resistors be reduced?

Cyclomatic Complexity reduction JS

Why didn't the Space Shuttle bounce back into space as many times as possible so as to lose a lot of kinetic energy up there?

Can't get 5V 3A DC constant

Is Diceware more secure than a long passphrase?

How can I get this effect? Please see the attached image

Rivers without rain

Retract an already submitted recommendation letter (written for an undergrad student)

Critique of timeline aesthetic

Which big number is bigger?

Why was the Spitfire's elliptical wing almost uncopied by other aircraft of World War 2?

Your bread will be buttered on both sides

How can I practically buy stocks?

What happens in the secondary winding if there's no spark plug connected?

How to denote matrix elements succinctly?

All ASCII characters with a given bit count

Philosophical question on logistic regression: why isn't the optimal threshold value trained?

'regex' and 'name' directives in find

Multiple options vs single option UI

On The Origin of Dissonant Chords



What do three bars across the stem of a note mean?


How to read this measure of music with “in between” notes?Over/under pitch noteSame number above notes in violin sheetHow to play eighths (quavers) interspersed only with quarter notes (crotchets) in swing timeIs this small note played at the same time as the regular-sized note?How to clearly notate tuplets, both “simple” and “complex,” in irregular metersDo note lengths matter when they have l.v. ties?How to rewrite this rhythm from common time to 12/8 time?How do I interpret two notes in a tempo marking?When and how to use finger and position markings?













5















I am wondering how are to be understood the following notes and how to play them on the violin.



  1. There is no indication of tremolo on the score. Nevertheless, should I understand this as tremolo on the quarter and half note ? How about the 16th notes which are marked each separately with an additional bar ?

enter image description here



  1. Below you see above a similar construction the number 3 above each of the quarter notes. Is it indicating the finger ? I know that sometimes the number 3 indicates a triplet but I dont think it is about a triplet here.

enter image description here










share|improve this question




























    5















    I am wondering how are to be understood the following notes and how to play them on the violin.



    1. There is no indication of tremolo on the score. Nevertheless, should I understand this as tremolo on the quarter and half note ? How about the 16th notes which are marked each separately with an additional bar ?

    enter image description here



    1. Below you see above a similar construction the number 3 above each of the quarter notes. Is it indicating the finger ? I know that sometimes the number 3 indicates a triplet but I dont think it is about a triplet here.

    enter image description here










    share|improve this question


























      5












      5








      5








      I am wondering how are to be understood the following notes and how to play them on the violin.



      1. There is no indication of tremolo on the score. Nevertheless, should I understand this as tremolo on the quarter and half note ? How about the 16th notes which are marked each separately with an additional bar ?

      enter image description here



      1. Below you see above a similar construction the number 3 above each of the quarter notes. Is it indicating the finger ? I know that sometimes the number 3 indicates a triplet but I dont think it is about a triplet here.

      enter image description here










      share|improve this question
















      I am wondering how are to be understood the following notes and how to play them on the violin.



      1. There is no indication of tremolo on the score. Nevertheless, should I understand this as tremolo on the quarter and half note ? How about the 16th notes which are marked each separately with an additional bar ?

      enter image description here



      1. Below you see above a similar construction the number 3 above each of the quarter notes. Is it indicating the finger ? I know that sometimes the number 3 indicates a triplet but I dont think it is about a triplet here.

      enter image description here







      notation violin tremolo






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Apr 6 at 21:44









      200_success

      1,165916




      1,165916










      asked Apr 6 at 11:15









      ivoivo

      18214




      18214




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          9














          These are tremolos.



          The first extract is executed entirely in 32nd notes.



          The second extract is executed entirely in eighth-note triplets.






          share|improve this answer























          • Thanks. In the second ectract, why would be important to indicate it is about triplets, in other words will the tremolo sound different if one would omit the number 3 ?

            – ivo
            Apr 6 at 11:44






          • 3





            With the triplets, this measure will contain twelve notes, each written note being played three times. Without the triplet, the measure will contain eight notes, each written note being played twice. If the triplet marking were absent, the quarter notes would not be dotted. This bar is in common time, 4/4. If it were in 12/8, the triplet marking would be unnecessary.

            – replete
            Apr 6 at 11:45












          • You are saying that without the triplet each not is played twice. As far as I know, when playing a tremolo you play a note as many times as it is possible within the duration of the note. Please correct me If am wrong.

            – ivo
            Apr 6 at 12:05






          • 6





            @ivo - when tremolo is marked, the number if bars near to the noteheads is usually indicative of how fast the tremolo is expected to be played.

            – Tim
            Apr 6 at 13:02


















          3














          Whether it is tremolo or not depends on the tempo. I mean how fast is the quarter notes? If the tempo is slow then you can play the 32nd notes exactly as 32nd notes. If the tempo is fast then it is tremolo.



          A usual way to notate tremolo is to make the note values so fast in the relation to the tempo that it is obvious the composer wants tremolo. Thus if the tempo is slow the composer would write 64th notes in order to make sure that a tremolo is played, but if the tempo is fast the composer writes 32nd notes. Sometimes the composer writes the word "tremolo" if it is not clear from the tempo and he does want tremolo. But often it is not necessary. The composer can also indicate if he wants it exactly metered.



          The triplets are supposed to be played exact, 3 notes on each quarter note, otherwise it would make no sense to write triplets. Note that the number 3 is tilted. Tilted numbers are standard for tuplets. If it was about fingering they should not be tilted.



          ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤



          EDIT This edit is written a couple of days after the above answer was written:



          @ivo posted a comment below and that calls for an elaboration on how to fully understand that type of notation. This is his comment:




          Many thanks for your instructive answer. I still have a problem when it comes to playing the tremolo. On the first picture given the 4 notes in the second beat do you play them as tremolo (if the tempo permits) one after the other and then return and play again one after the other and so on for the duration of one quarter note, or you play each of them individually as tremolo for the duration of 1/16th each ? Thanks again.




          Instead of trying to explain it with words I think an image will tell you much better how to actually interprete this kind of notation:



          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer

























          • I wonder why this answer was downvoted. The answer is correct and relates to what is standard and gives a detailed view that wasn't told in the other answer.

            – Lars Peter Schultz
            Apr 6 at 23:05











          • I also wonder why. Your answer seems perfectly reasonable. Pedantically, in some places people use tremolo for both measured and unmeasured repetition, which is contrary to the usage in your answer, but that is merely local and not worth a downvote. I have upvoted to cancel out the strange downvote.

            – replete
            Apr 7 at 0:24






          • 1





            I would add that voting on this site is not always easy to understand. I have written quite detailed answers sometimes, giving considerable effort to it, yet they attracted few viewers and only a couple of votes. I have also written very terse answers to simple questions, with little effort - like this one - yet they quickly attracted many votes. All we can do is shrug.

            – replete
            Apr 7 at 0:26












          • In a solo piano piece I wrote with quarter note = 72 bpm, I wrote 64th notes, found they still sounded distinct enough at that tempo, and meant them to NOT be played as unmeasured tremolo or grace notes. In a possibly related note, I once found 64th notes in Elgar's Pomp and Circumstance March No. 2 in A Minor--a piece normally taken at quarter note = 112 bpm or faster. Since Elgar writes grace notes in his Pomp and Circumstance March No. 3 in C Minor, I believe his use of 64th notes is purposeful, and I believe he means those notes to be measured.

            – Dekkadeci
            Apr 7 at 6:18






          • 1





            @ivo I have answered your question by adding an image to my post above. I find that better than trying to explain it in a comment.

            – Lars Peter Schultz
            Apr 9 at 22:06











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "240"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f82450%2fwhat-do-three-bars-across-the-stem-of-a-note-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          9














          These are tremolos.



          The first extract is executed entirely in 32nd notes.



          The second extract is executed entirely in eighth-note triplets.






          share|improve this answer























          • Thanks. In the second ectract, why would be important to indicate it is about triplets, in other words will the tremolo sound different if one would omit the number 3 ?

            – ivo
            Apr 6 at 11:44






          • 3





            With the triplets, this measure will contain twelve notes, each written note being played three times. Without the triplet, the measure will contain eight notes, each written note being played twice. If the triplet marking were absent, the quarter notes would not be dotted. This bar is in common time, 4/4. If it were in 12/8, the triplet marking would be unnecessary.

            – replete
            Apr 6 at 11:45












          • You are saying that without the triplet each not is played twice. As far as I know, when playing a tremolo you play a note as many times as it is possible within the duration of the note. Please correct me If am wrong.

            – ivo
            Apr 6 at 12:05






          • 6





            @ivo - when tremolo is marked, the number if bars near to the noteheads is usually indicative of how fast the tremolo is expected to be played.

            – Tim
            Apr 6 at 13:02















          9














          These are tremolos.



          The first extract is executed entirely in 32nd notes.



          The second extract is executed entirely in eighth-note triplets.






          share|improve this answer























          • Thanks. In the second ectract, why would be important to indicate it is about triplets, in other words will the tremolo sound different if one would omit the number 3 ?

            – ivo
            Apr 6 at 11:44






          • 3





            With the triplets, this measure will contain twelve notes, each written note being played three times. Without the triplet, the measure will contain eight notes, each written note being played twice. If the triplet marking were absent, the quarter notes would not be dotted. This bar is in common time, 4/4. If it were in 12/8, the triplet marking would be unnecessary.

            – replete
            Apr 6 at 11:45












          • You are saying that without the triplet each not is played twice. As far as I know, when playing a tremolo you play a note as many times as it is possible within the duration of the note. Please correct me If am wrong.

            – ivo
            Apr 6 at 12:05






          • 6





            @ivo - when tremolo is marked, the number if bars near to the noteheads is usually indicative of how fast the tremolo is expected to be played.

            – Tim
            Apr 6 at 13:02













          9












          9








          9







          These are tremolos.



          The first extract is executed entirely in 32nd notes.



          The second extract is executed entirely in eighth-note triplets.






          share|improve this answer













          These are tremolos.



          The first extract is executed entirely in 32nd notes.



          The second extract is executed entirely in eighth-note triplets.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Apr 6 at 11:30









          repletereplete

          4,59011632




          4,59011632












          • Thanks. In the second ectract, why would be important to indicate it is about triplets, in other words will the tremolo sound different if one would omit the number 3 ?

            – ivo
            Apr 6 at 11:44






          • 3





            With the triplets, this measure will contain twelve notes, each written note being played three times. Without the triplet, the measure will contain eight notes, each written note being played twice. If the triplet marking were absent, the quarter notes would not be dotted. This bar is in common time, 4/4. If it were in 12/8, the triplet marking would be unnecessary.

            – replete
            Apr 6 at 11:45












          • You are saying that without the triplet each not is played twice. As far as I know, when playing a tremolo you play a note as many times as it is possible within the duration of the note. Please correct me If am wrong.

            – ivo
            Apr 6 at 12:05






          • 6





            @ivo - when tremolo is marked, the number if bars near to the noteheads is usually indicative of how fast the tremolo is expected to be played.

            – Tim
            Apr 6 at 13:02

















          • Thanks. In the second ectract, why would be important to indicate it is about triplets, in other words will the tremolo sound different if one would omit the number 3 ?

            – ivo
            Apr 6 at 11:44






          • 3





            With the triplets, this measure will contain twelve notes, each written note being played three times. Without the triplet, the measure will contain eight notes, each written note being played twice. If the triplet marking were absent, the quarter notes would not be dotted. This bar is in common time, 4/4. If it were in 12/8, the triplet marking would be unnecessary.

            – replete
            Apr 6 at 11:45












          • You are saying that without the triplet each not is played twice. As far as I know, when playing a tremolo you play a note as many times as it is possible within the duration of the note. Please correct me If am wrong.

            – ivo
            Apr 6 at 12:05






          • 6





            @ivo - when tremolo is marked, the number if bars near to the noteheads is usually indicative of how fast the tremolo is expected to be played.

            – Tim
            Apr 6 at 13:02
















          Thanks. In the second ectract, why would be important to indicate it is about triplets, in other words will the tremolo sound different if one would omit the number 3 ?

          – ivo
          Apr 6 at 11:44





          Thanks. In the second ectract, why would be important to indicate it is about triplets, in other words will the tremolo sound different if one would omit the number 3 ?

          – ivo
          Apr 6 at 11:44




          3




          3





          With the triplets, this measure will contain twelve notes, each written note being played three times. Without the triplet, the measure will contain eight notes, each written note being played twice. If the triplet marking were absent, the quarter notes would not be dotted. This bar is in common time, 4/4. If it were in 12/8, the triplet marking would be unnecessary.

          – replete
          Apr 6 at 11:45






          With the triplets, this measure will contain twelve notes, each written note being played three times. Without the triplet, the measure will contain eight notes, each written note being played twice. If the triplet marking were absent, the quarter notes would not be dotted. This bar is in common time, 4/4. If it were in 12/8, the triplet marking would be unnecessary.

          – replete
          Apr 6 at 11:45














          You are saying that without the triplet each not is played twice. As far as I know, when playing a tremolo you play a note as many times as it is possible within the duration of the note. Please correct me If am wrong.

          – ivo
          Apr 6 at 12:05





          You are saying that without the triplet each not is played twice. As far as I know, when playing a tremolo you play a note as many times as it is possible within the duration of the note. Please correct me If am wrong.

          – ivo
          Apr 6 at 12:05




          6




          6





          @ivo - when tremolo is marked, the number if bars near to the noteheads is usually indicative of how fast the tremolo is expected to be played.

          – Tim
          Apr 6 at 13:02





          @ivo - when tremolo is marked, the number if bars near to the noteheads is usually indicative of how fast the tremolo is expected to be played.

          – Tim
          Apr 6 at 13:02











          3














          Whether it is tremolo or not depends on the tempo. I mean how fast is the quarter notes? If the tempo is slow then you can play the 32nd notes exactly as 32nd notes. If the tempo is fast then it is tremolo.



          A usual way to notate tremolo is to make the note values so fast in the relation to the tempo that it is obvious the composer wants tremolo. Thus if the tempo is slow the composer would write 64th notes in order to make sure that a tremolo is played, but if the tempo is fast the composer writes 32nd notes. Sometimes the composer writes the word "tremolo" if it is not clear from the tempo and he does want tremolo. But often it is not necessary. The composer can also indicate if he wants it exactly metered.



          The triplets are supposed to be played exact, 3 notes on each quarter note, otherwise it would make no sense to write triplets. Note that the number 3 is tilted. Tilted numbers are standard for tuplets. If it was about fingering they should not be tilted.



          ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤



          EDIT This edit is written a couple of days after the above answer was written:



          @ivo posted a comment below and that calls for an elaboration on how to fully understand that type of notation. This is his comment:




          Many thanks for your instructive answer. I still have a problem when it comes to playing the tremolo. On the first picture given the 4 notes in the second beat do you play them as tremolo (if the tempo permits) one after the other and then return and play again one after the other and so on for the duration of one quarter note, or you play each of them individually as tremolo for the duration of 1/16th each ? Thanks again.




          Instead of trying to explain it with words I think an image will tell you much better how to actually interprete this kind of notation:



          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer

























          • I wonder why this answer was downvoted. The answer is correct and relates to what is standard and gives a detailed view that wasn't told in the other answer.

            – Lars Peter Schultz
            Apr 6 at 23:05











          • I also wonder why. Your answer seems perfectly reasonable. Pedantically, in some places people use tremolo for both measured and unmeasured repetition, which is contrary to the usage in your answer, but that is merely local and not worth a downvote. I have upvoted to cancel out the strange downvote.

            – replete
            Apr 7 at 0:24






          • 1





            I would add that voting on this site is not always easy to understand. I have written quite detailed answers sometimes, giving considerable effort to it, yet they attracted few viewers and only a couple of votes. I have also written very terse answers to simple questions, with little effort - like this one - yet they quickly attracted many votes. All we can do is shrug.

            – replete
            Apr 7 at 0:26












          • In a solo piano piece I wrote with quarter note = 72 bpm, I wrote 64th notes, found they still sounded distinct enough at that tempo, and meant them to NOT be played as unmeasured tremolo or grace notes. In a possibly related note, I once found 64th notes in Elgar's Pomp and Circumstance March No. 2 in A Minor--a piece normally taken at quarter note = 112 bpm or faster. Since Elgar writes grace notes in his Pomp and Circumstance March No. 3 in C Minor, I believe his use of 64th notes is purposeful, and I believe he means those notes to be measured.

            – Dekkadeci
            Apr 7 at 6:18






          • 1





            @ivo I have answered your question by adding an image to my post above. I find that better than trying to explain it in a comment.

            – Lars Peter Schultz
            Apr 9 at 22:06















          3














          Whether it is tremolo or not depends on the tempo. I mean how fast is the quarter notes? If the tempo is slow then you can play the 32nd notes exactly as 32nd notes. If the tempo is fast then it is tremolo.



          A usual way to notate tremolo is to make the note values so fast in the relation to the tempo that it is obvious the composer wants tremolo. Thus if the tempo is slow the composer would write 64th notes in order to make sure that a tremolo is played, but if the tempo is fast the composer writes 32nd notes. Sometimes the composer writes the word "tremolo" if it is not clear from the tempo and he does want tremolo. But often it is not necessary. The composer can also indicate if he wants it exactly metered.



          The triplets are supposed to be played exact, 3 notes on each quarter note, otherwise it would make no sense to write triplets. Note that the number 3 is tilted. Tilted numbers are standard for tuplets. If it was about fingering they should not be tilted.



          ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤



          EDIT This edit is written a couple of days after the above answer was written:



          @ivo posted a comment below and that calls for an elaboration on how to fully understand that type of notation. This is his comment:




          Many thanks for your instructive answer. I still have a problem when it comes to playing the tremolo. On the first picture given the 4 notes in the second beat do you play them as tremolo (if the tempo permits) one after the other and then return and play again one after the other and so on for the duration of one quarter note, or you play each of them individually as tremolo for the duration of 1/16th each ? Thanks again.




          Instead of trying to explain it with words I think an image will tell you much better how to actually interprete this kind of notation:



          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer

























          • I wonder why this answer was downvoted. The answer is correct and relates to what is standard and gives a detailed view that wasn't told in the other answer.

            – Lars Peter Schultz
            Apr 6 at 23:05











          • I also wonder why. Your answer seems perfectly reasonable. Pedantically, in some places people use tremolo for both measured and unmeasured repetition, which is contrary to the usage in your answer, but that is merely local and not worth a downvote. I have upvoted to cancel out the strange downvote.

            – replete
            Apr 7 at 0:24






          • 1





            I would add that voting on this site is not always easy to understand. I have written quite detailed answers sometimes, giving considerable effort to it, yet they attracted few viewers and only a couple of votes. I have also written very terse answers to simple questions, with little effort - like this one - yet they quickly attracted many votes. All we can do is shrug.

            – replete
            Apr 7 at 0:26












          • In a solo piano piece I wrote with quarter note = 72 bpm, I wrote 64th notes, found they still sounded distinct enough at that tempo, and meant them to NOT be played as unmeasured tremolo or grace notes. In a possibly related note, I once found 64th notes in Elgar's Pomp and Circumstance March No. 2 in A Minor--a piece normally taken at quarter note = 112 bpm or faster. Since Elgar writes grace notes in his Pomp and Circumstance March No. 3 in C Minor, I believe his use of 64th notes is purposeful, and I believe he means those notes to be measured.

            – Dekkadeci
            Apr 7 at 6:18






          • 1





            @ivo I have answered your question by adding an image to my post above. I find that better than trying to explain it in a comment.

            – Lars Peter Schultz
            Apr 9 at 22:06













          3












          3








          3







          Whether it is tremolo or not depends on the tempo. I mean how fast is the quarter notes? If the tempo is slow then you can play the 32nd notes exactly as 32nd notes. If the tempo is fast then it is tremolo.



          A usual way to notate tremolo is to make the note values so fast in the relation to the tempo that it is obvious the composer wants tremolo. Thus if the tempo is slow the composer would write 64th notes in order to make sure that a tremolo is played, but if the tempo is fast the composer writes 32nd notes. Sometimes the composer writes the word "tremolo" if it is not clear from the tempo and he does want tremolo. But often it is not necessary. The composer can also indicate if he wants it exactly metered.



          The triplets are supposed to be played exact, 3 notes on each quarter note, otherwise it would make no sense to write triplets. Note that the number 3 is tilted. Tilted numbers are standard for tuplets. If it was about fingering they should not be tilted.



          ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤



          EDIT This edit is written a couple of days after the above answer was written:



          @ivo posted a comment below and that calls for an elaboration on how to fully understand that type of notation. This is his comment:




          Many thanks for your instructive answer. I still have a problem when it comes to playing the tremolo. On the first picture given the 4 notes in the second beat do you play them as tremolo (if the tempo permits) one after the other and then return and play again one after the other and so on for the duration of one quarter note, or you play each of them individually as tremolo for the duration of 1/16th each ? Thanks again.




          Instead of trying to explain it with words I think an image will tell you much better how to actually interprete this kind of notation:



          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer















          Whether it is tremolo or not depends on the tempo. I mean how fast is the quarter notes? If the tempo is slow then you can play the 32nd notes exactly as 32nd notes. If the tempo is fast then it is tremolo.



          A usual way to notate tremolo is to make the note values so fast in the relation to the tempo that it is obvious the composer wants tremolo. Thus if the tempo is slow the composer would write 64th notes in order to make sure that a tremolo is played, but if the tempo is fast the composer writes 32nd notes. Sometimes the composer writes the word "tremolo" if it is not clear from the tempo and he does want tremolo. But often it is not necessary. The composer can also indicate if he wants it exactly metered.



          The triplets are supposed to be played exact, 3 notes on each quarter note, otherwise it would make no sense to write triplets. Note that the number 3 is tilted. Tilted numbers are standard for tuplets. If it was about fingering they should not be tilted.



          ¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤



          EDIT This edit is written a couple of days after the above answer was written:



          @ivo posted a comment below and that calls for an elaboration on how to fully understand that type of notation. This is his comment:




          Many thanks for your instructive answer. I still have a problem when it comes to playing the tremolo. On the first picture given the 4 notes in the second beat do you play them as tremolo (if the tempo permits) one after the other and then return and play again one after the other and so on for the duration of one quarter note, or you play each of them individually as tremolo for the duration of 1/16th each ? Thanks again.




          Instead of trying to explain it with words I think an image will tell you much better how to actually interprete this kind of notation:



          enter image description here







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Apr 9 at 22:04

























          answered Apr 6 at 22:35









          Lars Peter SchultzLars Peter Schultz

          55716




          55716












          • I wonder why this answer was downvoted. The answer is correct and relates to what is standard and gives a detailed view that wasn't told in the other answer.

            – Lars Peter Schultz
            Apr 6 at 23:05











          • I also wonder why. Your answer seems perfectly reasonable. Pedantically, in some places people use tremolo for both measured and unmeasured repetition, which is contrary to the usage in your answer, but that is merely local and not worth a downvote. I have upvoted to cancel out the strange downvote.

            – replete
            Apr 7 at 0:24






          • 1





            I would add that voting on this site is not always easy to understand. I have written quite detailed answers sometimes, giving considerable effort to it, yet they attracted few viewers and only a couple of votes. I have also written very terse answers to simple questions, with little effort - like this one - yet they quickly attracted many votes. All we can do is shrug.

            – replete
            Apr 7 at 0:26












          • In a solo piano piece I wrote with quarter note = 72 bpm, I wrote 64th notes, found they still sounded distinct enough at that tempo, and meant them to NOT be played as unmeasured tremolo or grace notes. In a possibly related note, I once found 64th notes in Elgar's Pomp and Circumstance March No. 2 in A Minor--a piece normally taken at quarter note = 112 bpm or faster. Since Elgar writes grace notes in his Pomp and Circumstance March No. 3 in C Minor, I believe his use of 64th notes is purposeful, and I believe he means those notes to be measured.

            – Dekkadeci
            Apr 7 at 6:18






          • 1





            @ivo I have answered your question by adding an image to my post above. I find that better than trying to explain it in a comment.

            – Lars Peter Schultz
            Apr 9 at 22:06

















          • I wonder why this answer was downvoted. The answer is correct and relates to what is standard and gives a detailed view that wasn't told in the other answer.

            – Lars Peter Schultz
            Apr 6 at 23:05











          • I also wonder why. Your answer seems perfectly reasonable. Pedantically, in some places people use tremolo for both measured and unmeasured repetition, which is contrary to the usage in your answer, but that is merely local and not worth a downvote. I have upvoted to cancel out the strange downvote.

            – replete
            Apr 7 at 0:24






          • 1





            I would add that voting on this site is not always easy to understand. I have written quite detailed answers sometimes, giving considerable effort to it, yet they attracted few viewers and only a couple of votes. I have also written very terse answers to simple questions, with little effort - like this one - yet they quickly attracted many votes. All we can do is shrug.

            – replete
            Apr 7 at 0:26












          • In a solo piano piece I wrote with quarter note = 72 bpm, I wrote 64th notes, found they still sounded distinct enough at that tempo, and meant them to NOT be played as unmeasured tremolo or grace notes. In a possibly related note, I once found 64th notes in Elgar's Pomp and Circumstance March No. 2 in A Minor--a piece normally taken at quarter note = 112 bpm or faster. Since Elgar writes grace notes in his Pomp and Circumstance March No. 3 in C Minor, I believe his use of 64th notes is purposeful, and I believe he means those notes to be measured.

            – Dekkadeci
            Apr 7 at 6:18






          • 1





            @ivo I have answered your question by adding an image to my post above. I find that better than trying to explain it in a comment.

            – Lars Peter Schultz
            Apr 9 at 22:06
















          I wonder why this answer was downvoted. The answer is correct and relates to what is standard and gives a detailed view that wasn't told in the other answer.

          – Lars Peter Schultz
          Apr 6 at 23:05





          I wonder why this answer was downvoted. The answer is correct and relates to what is standard and gives a detailed view that wasn't told in the other answer.

          – Lars Peter Schultz
          Apr 6 at 23:05













          I also wonder why. Your answer seems perfectly reasonable. Pedantically, in some places people use tremolo for both measured and unmeasured repetition, which is contrary to the usage in your answer, but that is merely local and not worth a downvote. I have upvoted to cancel out the strange downvote.

          – replete
          Apr 7 at 0:24





          I also wonder why. Your answer seems perfectly reasonable. Pedantically, in some places people use tremolo for both measured and unmeasured repetition, which is contrary to the usage in your answer, but that is merely local and not worth a downvote. I have upvoted to cancel out the strange downvote.

          – replete
          Apr 7 at 0:24




          1




          1





          I would add that voting on this site is not always easy to understand. I have written quite detailed answers sometimes, giving considerable effort to it, yet they attracted few viewers and only a couple of votes. I have also written very terse answers to simple questions, with little effort - like this one - yet they quickly attracted many votes. All we can do is shrug.

          – replete
          Apr 7 at 0:26






          I would add that voting on this site is not always easy to understand. I have written quite detailed answers sometimes, giving considerable effort to it, yet they attracted few viewers and only a couple of votes. I have also written very terse answers to simple questions, with little effort - like this one - yet they quickly attracted many votes. All we can do is shrug.

          – replete
          Apr 7 at 0:26














          In a solo piano piece I wrote with quarter note = 72 bpm, I wrote 64th notes, found they still sounded distinct enough at that tempo, and meant them to NOT be played as unmeasured tremolo or grace notes. In a possibly related note, I once found 64th notes in Elgar's Pomp and Circumstance March No. 2 in A Minor--a piece normally taken at quarter note = 112 bpm or faster. Since Elgar writes grace notes in his Pomp and Circumstance March No. 3 in C Minor, I believe his use of 64th notes is purposeful, and I believe he means those notes to be measured.

          – Dekkadeci
          Apr 7 at 6:18





          In a solo piano piece I wrote with quarter note = 72 bpm, I wrote 64th notes, found they still sounded distinct enough at that tempo, and meant them to NOT be played as unmeasured tremolo or grace notes. In a possibly related note, I once found 64th notes in Elgar's Pomp and Circumstance March No. 2 in A Minor--a piece normally taken at quarter note = 112 bpm or faster. Since Elgar writes grace notes in his Pomp and Circumstance March No. 3 in C Minor, I believe his use of 64th notes is purposeful, and I believe he means those notes to be measured.

          – Dekkadeci
          Apr 7 at 6:18




          1




          1





          @ivo I have answered your question by adding an image to my post above. I find that better than trying to explain it in a comment.

          – Lars Peter Schultz
          Apr 9 at 22:06





          @ivo I have answered your question by adding an image to my post above. I find that better than trying to explain it in a comment.

          – Lars Peter Schultz
          Apr 9 at 22:06

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f82450%2fwhat-do-three-bars-across-the-stem-of-a-note-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Adding axes to figuresAdding axes labels to LaTeX figuresLaTeX equivalent of ConTeXt buffersRotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?adding axes to shapesAlign axes across subfiguresAdding figures with a certain orderLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themAdding axes labels to LaTeX figures

          Tähtien Talli Jäsenet | Lähteet | NavigointivalikkoSuomen Hippos – Tähtien Talli

          Do these cracks on my tires look bad? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowDry rot tire should I replace?Having to replace tiresFishtailed so easily? Bad tires? ABS?Filling the tires with something other than air, to avoid puncture hassles?Used Michelin tires safe to install?Do these tyre cracks necessitate replacement?Rumbling noise: tires or mechanicalIs it possible to fix noisy feathered tires?Are bad winter tires still better than summer tires in winter?Torque converter failure - Related to replacing only 2 tires?Why use snow tires on all 4 wheels on 2-wheel-drive cars?