At what level can a dragon innately cast its spells?How do you determine spells a dragon can cast?What level do I cast invisibility from the eldritch invocation Shroud of Shadow?Now that my wizard is a dragon, can I do the following things?How much should NPCs charge for spells cast as services to PCs?Can Innate Spellcasters cast spells from scrolls?RAW, can innate spellcaster dragons cast spells with somatic components?Can I use the Boon of Spell Mastery as a warlock for a spell that I didn't learn as a warlock, but learned as a different class?Could a Huge or bigger creature (bigger than a 10-foot-radius sphere) use Antimagic Field?What spell list must dragons use, if any?Spellcasting services profit for a PC with healing spells on different caster levels

Is it normal that my co-workers at a fitness company criticize my food choices?

Professor being mistaken for a grad student

All function values have been reset after restarting Mathematica

Software described as 香ばしい

My adviser wants to be the first author

Create shipment and invoice in mass action

Is it true that good novels will automatically sell themselves on Amazon (and so on) and there is no need for one to waste time promoting?

Backup with Hanoi Strategy

Good allowance savings plan?

How many prime numbers are there that can't be written as a sum of two composite numbers?

Why doesn't using two cd commands in bash script execute the second command?

Could the Saturn V actually have launched astronauts around Venus?

What is this large pipe coming out of my roof?

Welcoming 2019 Pi day: How to draw the letter π?

Giving EXEC (@Variable) a Column name and Concatenation

What has been your most complicated TikZ drawing?

Are the common programs (for example: "ls", "cat") in Linux and BSD come from the same source code?

Can I get a Visa Waiver after spending 6 months in USA with B-2 Visa?

Python if-else code style for reduced code

Co-worker team leader wants to inject his friend's awful software into our development. What should I say to our common boss?

Pass associative array as parameter list to script

Why do passenger jet manufacturers design their planes with stall prevention systems?

Rules about breaking the rules. How do I do it well?

How to change two letters closest to a string and one letter immediately after a string using notepad++



At what level can a dragon innately cast its spells?


How do you determine spells a dragon can cast?What level do I cast invisibility from the eldritch invocation Shroud of Shadow?Now that my wizard is a dragon, can I do the following things?How much should NPCs charge for spells cast as services to PCs?Can Innate Spellcasters cast spells from scrolls?RAW, can innate spellcaster dragons cast spells with somatic components?Can I use the Boon of Spell Mastery as a warlock for a spell that I didn't learn as a warlock, but learned as a different class?Could a Huge or bigger creature (bigger than a 10-foot-radius sphere) use Antimagic Field?What spell list must dragons use, if any?Spellcasting services profit for a PC with healing spells on different caster levels













17












$begingroup$


In D&D 5e, when using the Variant: Dragons as Innate Spellcasters, a spellcasting young red dragon is going to know 4 spells of up to 3rd level and can cast each spell once a day.



When the dragon casts, are the spells cast at 3rd level or at the lowest level for the spell?



Eg, does the dragon cast cure wounds at 3rd level, because it can?



Could the dragon cast invisibility on itself and its pet by casting it at 3rd level?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    17












    $begingroup$


    In D&D 5e, when using the Variant: Dragons as Innate Spellcasters, a spellcasting young red dragon is going to know 4 spells of up to 3rd level and can cast each spell once a day.



    When the dragon casts, are the spells cast at 3rd level or at the lowest level for the spell?



    Eg, does the dragon cast cure wounds at 3rd level, because it can?



    Could the dragon cast invisibility on itself and its pet by casting it at 3rd level?










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      17












      17








      17





      $begingroup$


      In D&D 5e, when using the Variant: Dragons as Innate Spellcasters, a spellcasting young red dragon is going to know 4 spells of up to 3rd level and can cast each spell once a day.



      When the dragon casts, are the spells cast at 3rd level or at the lowest level for the spell?



      Eg, does the dragon cast cure wounds at 3rd level, because it can?



      Could the dragon cast invisibility on itself and its pet by casting it at 3rd level?










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      In D&D 5e, when using the Variant: Dragons as Innate Spellcasters, a spellcasting young red dragon is going to know 4 spells of up to 3rd level and can cast each spell once a day.



      When the dragon casts, are the spells cast at 3rd level or at the lowest level for the spell?



      Eg, does the dragon cast cure wounds at 3rd level, because it can?



      Could the dragon cast invisibility on itself and its pet by casting it at 3rd level?







      dnd-5e spells dragons






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 18 hours ago









      V2Blast

      24.6k383155




      24.6k383155










      asked yesterday









      OverthinksOverthinks

      1,74431234




      1,74431234




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          37












          $begingroup$

          Dragons cannot upcast innate spells



          The MM says this on innate spellcasting (p.10):




          Unless noted otherwise, an innate spell of 1st level or higher is
          always cast at its lowest possible level and can't be cast at a higher
          level.




          This is not circumvented by the rules for dragons (p.86)




          Each spell [..] the spell’s level can be no higher than one-third the dragon’s
          Challenge rating (rounded down)




          The latter is about what spells the dragon knows, not about the spells they cast.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




















            12












            $begingroup$

            Might be up-castable to third level (if the spell can be upcast)



            It is worth bearing in mind that the Monster Manual Variant Spellcasting for dragons is a DM option that lacks a great deal of specificity. The Monster Manual is a DM tool, strictly speaking, and the DM has considerable latitude in how to implement a dragon's spellcasting ability if it is chosen. A non-variant dragon does not have the Innate Spellcasting trait (thank you @Spitemaster)



            Dragons as Innate Spellcasters (MM)




            A young or older dragon can innately cast a number of Spells equal to its Charisma modifier. Each spell can be cast once per day, requiring no material Components, and the spell’s level can be no higher than one-third the dragon’s Challenge rating (rounded down).




            Charisma Modifier: +4. Challenge Rating: 10 (young red dragon, MM)



            This is a variant rule, so make a ruling (or propose one to your DM)



            At first blush, casting the spell at its lowest level isn't a restriction. Since both of those spells can be up-cast per their spell text, and the dragon can cast spells at third level based on CR/3, the dragon could cast them at up to third level. Does the DM want to treat the dragon like a Warlock? There isn't guidance on that one way or the other, so the DM can treat all of this dragon's spells as third level spells.



            But wait! Innate spell casting has a restriction



            Innate Spellcasting




            A monster with the innate ability to cast Spells has the Innate Spellcasting Special trait. Unless noted otherwise, an innate spell of 1st level or higher is always cast at its lowest possible level and can’t be cast at a higher level.




            This text suggests that the invisibility spell would be cast at 2d level and could not be up cast.



            Is there a loophole? Maybe. You can argue that there's a 'noted otherwise' in the dragon's variant ability and thus innate spellcasting is not a hard restriction.




            the spell’s level can be no higher than one-third the dragon’s Challenge rating (rounded down)




            The restriction is "no higher than." This can be looked at as specific over general (Basic Rules, p. 5) that opens an exception to the general rule since it only limits the dragon spell levels at the upper end. You can make the case (as Szega does) that this isn't specific enough to override the general innate spellcasting rule. (A fair ruling).



            Variant Dragons aren't described as having spell slots




            A monster can Cast a Spell from its list at a higher level if it has
            the spell slot to do so. For example, a Drow Mage with the 3rd-level
            Lightning Bolt spell can cast it as a 5th-level spell by using one of
            its 5th-level Spell Slots.




            That leaves open to DM ruling whether spell slots are even a thing for a dragon. If they are not, then dragons are only limited by their CR for the level at which their spells are cast. For example, are the spells cast as a warlock's spells are cast, all at the same level? That's up to the DM to decide.



            "The spell’s level can be no higher than ..."




            When a spellcaster casts a spell using a slot that is of a higher level than the spell, the spell assumes the higher level for that casting. For instance, if Umara casts Magic Missile using one of her 2nd-level slots, that Magic Missile is 2nd level. Effectively, the spell expands to fill the slot it is put into. (Spell casting, Chapter 10)




            We begin to see how wide open this variant rule is. Most of the other spell casters (like the Archmage or the Cult Fanatic) have spell slots listed and depicted. The dragon doesn't. This all boils down to how the DM wants to treat the dragon's not having assigned spell slots. Is this a a restriction or not?



            1. If it is a restriction, go for the simple ruling.

            2. If not, go for the more nuanced ruling.

            Simple ruling: can't be up cast.



            Due to innate casting's general limitations, the simplest way to approach this is "the dragon casts spells at their lowest level." This is further supported by the lack of spell slots to assign to a given spell.



            More nuanced ruling: yes they can be upcast



            The specified restriction on spell level is based on the dragon's CR. The appeal to specific over general is that the text specific to the dragon only limits spells maximum level. A lower level spell cast at a higher level expands to fill the slot ... That's not strong argument, but it's a way to apply specific over general to a wide open variant rule.



            And this is a dragon. Who is to say that their spell level doesn't work like a warlock's? The DM.



            This is a variant rule, its application will need to be adjudicated by the DM.



            What ruling is more fun at your table? Discuss with your DM. It's a dragon - they named the game after these creatures.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$








            • 9




              $begingroup$
              @KorvinStarmast actually, it's pretty clear that the spells are cast at lowest level. The MM says on page 10 "A monster with the innate ability to cast spells has the Innate Spellcasting special trait. Unless noted otherwise, an innate spell of 1st level or higher is always cast at its lowest possible level and can't be cast at a higher level." The dragon doesn't explicitly have the Innate Spellcasting trait, but that's not necessary, because it implicitly has it due to "A young or older dragon can innately cast a number of spells ...". Therefore, no upcasting for innately casting dragons.
              $endgroup$
              – PixelMaster
              yesterday






            • 3




              $begingroup$
              You're free to approach the topic any way you want. However, in my opinion, the RAW is 100% unambiguous: the dragon is clearly supposed to have the Innate Spellcasting trait, and Innate Spellcasting doesn't allow upcasting. Your answer doesn't clearly express this in the beginning (or elsewhere), so I'm afraid that, as far as I'm concerned - your answer is currently incorrect.
              $endgroup$
              – PixelMaster
              yesterday






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              @PixelMaster You opinion is noted. Thanks for the feedback. RAF is a valid way to engage with the rules.
              $endgroup$
              – KorvinStarmast
              yesterday







            • 5




              $begingroup$
              sure, but there has to be a clear distinction what is RAW, what is RAI, and what is RAF. I don't disagree that it might be more fun to rule your way. As it is, I think your answer is a little unstructured and confusing, due to multiple edits (at least partly caused by my comments, I reckon). If you boil the content down to the central points, clearly mark which aspects are RAW/RAI/RAF, and improve the structure and readability, I think the answer would be significantly improved.
              $endgroup$
              – PixelMaster
              yesterday







            • 11




              $begingroup$
              @Spitemaster yes, they do, and that's precisely my point. The MM says on page 10: "A monster with the innate ability to cast spells has the Innate Spellcasting special trait." Since the variant rule states that "A young or older dragon can innately cast a number of spells", the logical conclusion is that, with the variant rule, dragons implicitly have the Innate Spellcasting trait.
              $endgroup$
              – PixelMaster
              23 hours ago











            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "122"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143126%2fat-what-level-can-a-dragon-innately-cast-its-spells%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            37












            $begingroup$

            Dragons cannot upcast innate spells



            The MM says this on innate spellcasting (p.10):




            Unless noted otherwise, an innate spell of 1st level or higher is
            always cast at its lowest possible level and can't be cast at a higher
            level.




            This is not circumvented by the rules for dragons (p.86)




            Each spell [..] the spell’s level can be no higher than one-third the dragon’s
            Challenge rating (rounded down)




            The latter is about what spells the dragon knows, not about the spells they cast.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              37












              $begingroup$

              Dragons cannot upcast innate spells



              The MM says this on innate spellcasting (p.10):




              Unless noted otherwise, an innate spell of 1st level or higher is
              always cast at its lowest possible level and can't be cast at a higher
              level.




              This is not circumvented by the rules for dragons (p.86)




              Each spell [..] the spell’s level can be no higher than one-third the dragon’s
              Challenge rating (rounded down)




              The latter is about what spells the dragon knows, not about the spells they cast.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                37












                37








                37





                $begingroup$

                Dragons cannot upcast innate spells



                The MM says this on innate spellcasting (p.10):




                Unless noted otherwise, an innate spell of 1st level or higher is
                always cast at its lowest possible level and can't be cast at a higher
                level.




                This is not circumvented by the rules for dragons (p.86)




                Each spell [..] the spell’s level can be no higher than one-third the dragon’s
                Challenge rating (rounded down)




                The latter is about what spells the dragon knows, not about the spells they cast.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Dragons cannot upcast innate spells



                The MM says this on innate spellcasting (p.10):




                Unless noted otherwise, an innate spell of 1st level or higher is
                always cast at its lowest possible level and can't be cast at a higher
                level.




                This is not circumvented by the rules for dragons (p.86)




                Each spell [..] the spell’s level can be no higher than one-third the dragon’s
                Challenge rating (rounded down)




                The latter is about what spells the dragon knows, not about the spells they cast.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered yesterday









                SzegaSzega

                39.6k4162198




                39.6k4162198























                    12












                    $begingroup$

                    Might be up-castable to third level (if the spell can be upcast)



                    It is worth bearing in mind that the Monster Manual Variant Spellcasting for dragons is a DM option that lacks a great deal of specificity. The Monster Manual is a DM tool, strictly speaking, and the DM has considerable latitude in how to implement a dragon's spellcasting ability if it is chosen. A non-variant dragon does not have the Innate Spellcasting trait (thank you @Spitemaster)



                    Dragons as Innate Spellcasters (MM)




                    A young or older dragon can innately cast a number of Spells equal to its Charisma modifier. Each spell can be cast once per day, requiring no material Components, and the spell’s level can be no higher than one-third the dragon’s Challenge rating (rounded down).




                    Charisma Modifier: +4. Challenge Rating: 10 (young red dragon, MM)



                    This is a variant rule, so make a ruling (or propose one to your DM)



                    At first blush, casting the spell at its lowest level isn't a restriction. Since both of those spells can be up-cast per their spell text, and the dragon can cast spells at third level based on CR/3, the dragon could cast them at up to third level. Does the DM want to treat the dragon like a Warlock? There isn't guidance on that one way or the other, so the DM can treat all of this dragon's spells as third level spells.



                    But wait! Innate spell casting has a restriction



                    Innate Spellcasting




                    A monster with the innate ability to cast Spells has the Innate Spellcasting Special trait. Unless noted otherwise, an innate spell of 1st level or higher is always cast at its lowest possible level and can’t be cast at a higher level.




                    This text suggests that the invisibility spell would be cast at 2d level and could not be up cast.



                    Is there a loophole? Maybe. You can argue that there's a 'noted otherwise' in the dragon's variant ability and thus innate spellcasting is not a hard restriction.




                    the spell’s level can be no higher than one-third the dragon’s Challenge rating (rounded down)




                    The restriction is "no higher than." This can be looked at as specific over general (Basic Rules, p. 5) that opens an exception to the general rule since it only limits the dragon spell levels at the upper end. You can make the case (as Szega does) that this isn't specific enough to override the general innate spellcasting rule. (A fair ruling).



                    Variant Dragons aren't described as having spell slots




                    A monster can Cast a Spell from its list at a higher level if it has
                    the spell slot to do so. For example, a Drow Mage with the 3rd-level
                    Lightning Bolt spell can cast it as a 5th-level spell by using one of
                    its 5th-level Spell Slots.




                    That leaves open to DM ruling whether spell slots are even a thing for a dragon. If they are not, then dragons are only limited by their CR for the level at which their spells are cast. For example, are the spells cast as a warlock's spells are cast, all at the same level? That's up to the DM to decide.



                    "The spell’s level can be no higher than ..."




                    When a spellcaster casts a spell using a slot that is of a higher level than the spell, the spell assumes the higher level for that casting. For instance, if Umara casts Magic Missile using one of her 2nd-level slots, that Magic Missile is 2nd level. Effectively, the spell expands to fill the slot it is put into. (Spell casting, Chapter 10)




                    We begin to see how wide open this variant rule is. Most of the other spell casters (like the Archmage or the Cult Fanatic) have spell slots listed and depicted. The dragon doesn't. This all boils down to how the DM wants to treat the dragon's not having assigned spell slots. Is this a a restriction or not?



                    1. If it is a restriction, go for the simple ruling.

                    2. If not, go for the more nuanced ruling.

                    Simple ruling: can't be up cast.



                    Due to innate casting's general limitations, the simplest way to approach this is "the dragon casts spells at their lowest level." This is further supported by the lack of spell slots to assign to a given spell.



                    More nuanced ruling: yes they can be upcast



                    The specified restriction on spell level is based on the dragon's CR. The appeal to specific over general is that the text specific to the dragon only limits spells maximum level. A lower level spell cast at a higher level expands to fill the slot ... That's not strong argument, but it's a way to apply specific over general to a wide open variant rule.



                    And this is a dragon. Who is to say that their spell level doesn't work like a warlock's? The DM.



                    This is a variant rule, its application will need to be adjudicated by the DM.



                    What ruling is more fun at your table? Discuss with your DM. It's a dragon - they named the game after these creatures.






                    share|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$








                    • 9




                      $begingroup$
                      @KorvinStarmast actually, it's pretty clear that the spells are cast at lowest level. The MM says on page 10 "A monster with the innate ability to cast spells has the Innate Spellcasting special trait. Unless noted otherwise, an innate spell of 1st level or higher is always cast at its lowest possible level and can't be cast at a higher level." The dragon doesn't explicitly have the Innate Spellcasting trait, but that's not necessary, because it implicitly has it due to "A young or older dragon can innately cast a number of spells ...". Therefore, no upcasting for innately casting dragons.
                      $endgroup$
                      – PixelMaster
                      yesterday






                    • 3




                      $begingroup$
                      You're free to approach the topic any way you want. However, in my opinion, the RAW is 100% unambiguous: the dragon is clearly supposed to have the Innate Spellcasting trait, and Innate Spellcasting doesn't allow upcasting. Your answer doesn't clearly express this in the beginning (or elsewhere), so I'm afraid that, as far as I'm concerned - your answer is currently incorrect.
                      $endgroup$
                      – PixelMaster
                      yesterday






                    • 2




                      $begingroup$
                      @PixelMaster You opinion is noted. Thanks for the feedback. RAF is a valid way to engage with the rules.
                      $endgroup$
                      – KorvinStarmast
                      yesterday







                    • 5




                      $begingroup$
                      sure, but there has to be a clear distinction what is RAW, what is RAI, and what is RAF. I don't disagree that it might be more fun to rule your way. As it is, I think your answer is a little unstructured and confusing, due to multiple edits (at least partly caused by my comments, I reckon). If you boil the content down to the central points, clearly mark which aspects are RAW/RAI/RAF, and improve the structure and readability, I think the answer would be significantly improved.
                      $endgroup$
                      – PixelMaster
                      yesterday







                    • 11




                      $begingroup$
                      @Spitemaster yes, they do, and that's precisely my point. The MM says on page 10: "A monster with the innate ability to cast spells has the Innate Spellcasting special trait." Since the variant rule states that "A young or older dragon can innately cast a number of spells", the logical conclusion is that, with the variant rule, dragons implicitly have the Innate Spellcasting trait.
                      $endgroup$
                      – PixelMaster
                      23 hours ago
















                    12












                    $begingroup$

                    Might be up-castable to third level (if the spell can be upcast)



                    It is worth bearing in mind that the Monster Manual Variant Spellcasting for dragons is a DM option that lacks a great deal of specificity. The Monster Manual is a DM tool, strictly speaking, and the DM has considerable latitude in how to implement a dragon's spellcasting ability if it is chosen. A non-variant dragon does not have the Innate Spellcasting trait (thank you @Spitemaster)



                    Dragons as Innate Spellcasters (MM)




                    A young or older dragon can innately cast a number of Spells equal to its Charisma modifier. Each spell can be cast once per day, requiring no material Components, and the spell’s level can be no higher than one-third the dragon’s Challenge rating (rounded down).




                    Charisma Modifier: +4. Challenge Rating: 10 (young red dragon, MM)



                    This is a variant rule, so make a ruling (or propose one to your DM)



                    At first blush, casting the spell at its lowest level isn't a restriction. Since both of those spells can be up-cast per their spell text, and the dragon can cast spells at third level based on CR/3, the dragon could cast them at up to third level. Does the DM want to treat the dragon like a Warlock? There isn't guidance on that one way or the other, so the DM can treat all of this dragon's spells as third level spells.



                    But wait! Innate spell casting has a restriction



                    Innate Spellcasting




                    A monster with the innate ability to cast Spells has the Innate Spellcasting Special trait. Unless noted otherwise, an innate spell of 1st level or higher is always cast at its lowest possible level and can’t be cast at a higher level.




                    This text suggests that the invisibility spell would be cast at 2d level and could not be up cast.



                    Is there a loophole? Maybe. You can argue that there's a 'noted otherwise' in the dragon's variant ability and thus innate spellcasting is not a hard restriction.




                    the spell’s level can be no higher than one-third the dragon’s Challenge rating (rounded down)




                    The restriction is "no higher than." This can be looked at as specific over general (Basic Rules, p. 5) that opens an exception to the general rule since it only limits the dragon spell levels at the upper end. You can make the case (as Szega does) that this isn't specific enough to override the general innate spellcasting rule. (A fair ruling).



                    Variant Dragons aren't described as having spell slots




                    A monster can Cast a Spell from its list at a higher level if it has
                    the spell slot to do so. For example, a Drow Mage with the 3rd-level
                    Lightning Bolt spell can cast it as a 5th-level spell by using one of
                    its 5th-level Spell Slots.




                    That leaves open to DM ruling whether spell slots are even a thing for a dragon. If they are not, then dragons are only limited by their CR for the level at which their spells are cast. For example, are the spells cast as a warlock's spells are cast, all at the same level? That's up to the DM to decide.



                    "The spell’s level can be no higher than ..."




                    When a spellcaster casts a spell using a slot that is of a higher level than the spell, the spell assumes the higher level for that casting. For instance, if Umara casts Magic Missile using one of her 2nd-level slots, that Magic Missile is 2nd level. Effectively, the spell expands to fill the slot it is put into. (Spell casting, Chapter 10)




                    We begin to see how wide open this variant rule is. Most of the other spell casters (like the Archmage or the Cult Fanatic) have spell slots listed and depicted. The dragon doesn't. This all boils down to how the DM wants to treat the dragon's not having assigned spell slots. Is this a a restriction or not?



                    1. If it is a restriction, go for the simple ruling.

                    2. If not, go for the more nuanced ruling.

                    Simple ruling: can't be up cast.



                    Due to innate casting's general limitations, the simplest way to approach this is "the dragon casts spells at their lowest level." This is further supported by the lack of spell slots to assign to a given spell.



                    More nuanced ruling: yes they can be upcast



                    The specified restriction on spell level is based on the dragon's CR. The appeal to specific over general is that the text specific to the dragon only limits spells maximum level. A lower level spell cast at a higher level expands to fill the slot ... That's not strong argument, but it's a way to apply specific over general to a wide open variant rule.



                    And this is a dragon. Who is to say that their spell level doesn't work like a warlock's? The DM.



                    This is a variant rule, its application will need to be adjudicated by the DM.



                    What ruling is more fun at your table? Discuss with your DM. It's a dragon - they named the game after these creatures.






                    share|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$








                    • 9




                      $begingroup$
                      @KorvinStarmast actually, it's pretty clear that the spells are cast at lowest level. The MM says on page 10 "A monster with the innate ability to cast spells has the Innate Spellcasting special trait. Unless noted otherwise, an innate spell of 1st level or higher is always cast at its lowest possible level and can't be cast at a higher level." The dragon doesn't explicitly have the Innate Spellcasting trait, but that's not necessary, because it implicitly has it due to "A young or older dragon can innately cast a number of spells ...". Therefore, no upcasting for innately casting dragons.
                      $endgroup$
                      – PixelMaster
                      yesterday






                    • 3




                      $begingroup$
                      You're free to approach the topic any way you want. However, in my opinion, the RAW is 100% unambiguous: the dragon is clearly supposed to have the Innate Spellcasting trait, and Innate Spellcasting doesn't allow upcasting. Your answer doesn't clearly express this in the beginning (or elsewhere), so I'm afraid that, as far as I'm concerned - your answer is currently incorrect.
                      $endgroup$
                      – PixelMaster
                      yesterday






                    • 2




                      $begingroup$
                      @PixelMaster You opinion is noted. Thanks for the feedback. RAF is a valid way to engage with the rules.
                      $endgroup$
                      – KorvinStarmast
                      yesterday







                    • 5




                      $begingroup$
                      sure, but there has to be a clear distinction what is RAW, what is RAI, and what is RAF. I don't disagree that it might be more fun to rule your way. As it is, I think your answer is a little unstructured and confusing, due to multiple edits (at least partly caused by my comments, I reckon). If you boil the content down to the central points, clearly mark which aspects are RAW/RAI/RAF, and improve the structure and readability, I think the answer would be significantly improved.
                      $endgroup$
                      – PixelMaster
                      yesterday







                    • 11




                      $begingroup$
                      @Spitemaster yes, they do, and that's precisely my point. The MM says on page 10: "A monster with the innate ability to cast spells has the Innate Spellcasting special trait." Since the variant rule states that "A young or older dragon can innately cast a number of spells", the logical conclusion is that, with the variant rule, dragons implicitly have the Innate Spellcasting trait.
                      $endgroup$
                      – PixelMaster
                      23 hours ago














                    12












                    12








                    12





                    $begingroup$

                    Might be up-castable to third level (if the spell can be upcast)



                    It is worth bearing in mind that the Monster Manual Variant Spellcasting for dragons is a DM option that lacks a great deal of specificity. The Monster Manual is a DM tool, strictly speaking, and the DM has considerable latitude in how to implement a dragon's spellcasting ability if it is chosen. A non-variant dragon does not have the Innate Spellcasting trait (thank you @Spitemaster)



                    Dragons as Innate Spellcasters (MM)




                    A young or older dragon can innately cast a number of Spells equal to its Charisma modifier. Each spell can be cast once per day, requiring no material Components, and the spell’s level can be no higher than one-third the dragon’s Challenge rating (rounded down).




                    Charisma Modifier: +4. Challenge Rating: 10 (young red dragon, MM)



                    This is a variant rule, so make a ruling (or propose one to your DM)



                    At first blush, casting the spell at its lowest level isn't a restriction. Since both of those spells can be up-cast per their spell text, and the dragon can cast spells at third level based on CR/3, the dragon could cast them at up to third level. Does the DM want to treat the dragon like a Warlock? There isn't guidance on that one way or the other, so the DM can treat all of this dragon's spells as third level spells.



                    But wait! Innate spell casting has a restriction



                    Innate Spellcasting




                    A monster with the innate ability to cast Spells has the Innate Spellcasting Special trait. Unless noted otherwise, an innate spell of 1st level or higher is always cast at its lowest possible level and can’t be cast at a higher level.




                    This text suggests that the invisibility spell would be cast at 2d level and could not be up cast.



                    Is there a loophole? Maybe. You can argue that there's a 'noted otherwise' in the dragon's variant ability and thus innate spellcasting is not a hard restriction.




                    the spell’s level can be no higher than one-third the dragon’s Challenge rating (rounded down)




                    The restriction is "no higher than." This can be looked at as specific over general (Basic Rules, p. 5) that opens an exception to the general rule since it only limits the dragon spell levels at the upper end. You can make the case (as Szega does) that this isn't specific enough to override the general innate spellcasting rule. (A fair ruling).



                    Variant Dragons aren't described as having spell slots




                    A monster can Cast a Spell from its list at a higher level if it has
                    the spell slot to do so. For example, a Drow Mage with the 3rd-level
                    Lightning Bolt spell can cast it as a 5th-level spell by using one of
                    its 5th-level Spell Slots.




                    That leaves open to DM ruling whether spell slots are even a thing for a dragon. If they are not, then dragons are only limited by their CR for the level at which their spells are cast. For example, are the spells cast as a warlock's spells are cast, all at the same level? That's up to the DM to decide.



                    "The spell’s level can be no higher than ..."




                    When a spellcaster casts a spell using a slot that is of a higher level than the spell, the spell assumes the higher level for that casting. For instance, if Umara casts Magic Missile using one of her 2nd-level slots, that Magic Missile is 2nd level. Effectively, the spell expands to fill the slot it is put into. (Spell casting, Chapter 10)




                    We begin to see how wide open this variant rule is. Most of the other spell casters (like the Archmage or the Cult Fanatic) have spell slots listed and depicted. The dragon doesn't. This all boils down to how the DM wants to treat the dragon's not having assigned spell slots. Is this a a restriction or not?



                    1. If it is a restriction, go for the simple ruling.

                    2. If not, go for the more nuanced ruling.

                    Simple ruling: can't be up cast.



                    Due to innate casting's general limitations, the simplest way to approach this is "the dragon casts spells at their lowest level." This is further supported by the lack of spell slots to assign to a given spell.



                    More nuanced ruling: yes they can be upcast



                    The specified restriction on spell level is based on the dragon's CR. The appeal to specific over general is that the text specific to the dragon only limits spells maximum level. A lower level spell cast at a higher level expands to fill the slot ... That's not strong argument, but it's a way to apply specific over general to a wide open variant rule.



                    And this is a dragon. Who is to say that their spell level doesn't work like a warlock's? The DM.



                    This is a variant rule, its application will need to be adjudicated by the DM.



                    What ruling is more fun at your table? Discuss with your DM. It's a dragon - they named the game after these creatures.






                    share|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    Might be up-castable to third level (if the spell can be upcast)



                    It is worth bearing in mind that the Monster Manual Variant Spellcasting for dragons is a DM option that lacks a great deal of specificity. The Monster Manual is a DM tool, strictly speaking, and the DM has considerable latitude in how to implement a dragon's spellcasting ability if it is chosen. A non-variant dragon does not have the Innate Spellcasting trait (thank you @Spitemaster)



                    Dragons as Innate Spellcasters (MM)




                    A young or older dragon can innately cast a number of Spells equal to its Charisma modifier. Each spell can be cast once per day, requiring no material Components, and the spell’s level can be no higher than one-third the dragon’s Challenge rating (rounded down).




                    Charisma Modifier: +4. Challenge Rating: 10 (young red dragon, MM)



                    This is a variant rule, so make a ruling (or propose one to your DM)



                    At first blush, casting the spell at its lowest level isn't a restriction. Since both of those spells can be up-cast per their spell text, and the dragon can cast spells at third level based on CR/3, the dragon could cast them at up to third level. Does the DM want to treat the dragon like a Warlock? There isn't guidance on that one way or the other, so the DM can treat all of this dragon's spells as third level spells.



                    But wait! Innate spell casting has a restriction



                    Innate Spellcasting




                    A monster with the innate ability to cast Spells has the Innate Spellcasting Special trait. Unless noted otherwise, an innate spell of 1st level or higher is always cast at its lowest possible level and can’t be cast at a higher level.




                    This text suggests that the invisibility spell would be cast at 2d level and could not be up cast.



                    Is there a loophole? Maybe. You can argue that there's a 'noted otherwise' in the dragon's variant ability and thus innate spellcasting is not a hard restriction.




                    the spell’s level can be no higher than one-third the dragon’s Challenge rating (rounded down)




                    The restriction is "no higher than." This can be looked at as specific over general (Basic Rules, p. 5) that opens an exception to the general rule since it only limits the dragon spell levels at the upper end. You can make the case (as Szega does) that this isn't specific enough to override the general innate spellcasting rule. (A fair ruling).



                    Variant Dragons aren't described as having spell slots




                    A monster can Cast a Spell from its list at a higher level if it has
                    the spell slot to do so. For example, a Drow Mage with the 3rd-level
                    Lightning Bolt spell can cast it as a 5th-level spell by using one of
                    its 5th-level Spell Slots.




                    That leaves open to DM ruling whether spell slots are even a thing for a dragon. If they are not, then dragons are only limited by their CR for the level at which their spells are cast. For example, are the spells cast as a warlock's spells are cast, all at the same level? That's up to the DM to decide.



                    "The spell’s level can be no higher than ..."




                    When a spellcaster casts a spell using a slot that is of a higher level than the spell, the spell assumes the higher level for that casting. For instance, if Umara casts Magic Missile using one of her 2nd-level slots, that Magic Missile is 2nd level. Effectively, the spell expands to fill the slot it is put into. (Spell casting, Chapter 10)




                    We begin to see how wide open this variant rule is. Most of the other spell casters (like the Archmage or the Cult Fanatic) have spell slots listed and depicted. The dragon doesn't. This all boils down to how the DM wants to treat the dragon's not having assigned spell slots. Is this a a restriction or not?



                    1. If it is a restriction, go for the simple ruling.

                    2. If not, go for the more nuanced ruling.

                    Simple ruling: can't be up cast.



                    Due to innate casting's general limitations, the simplest way to approach this is "the dragon casts spells at their lowest level." This is further supported by the lack of spell slots to assign to a given spell.



                    More nuanced ruling: yes they can be upcast



                    The specified restriction on spell level is based on the dragon's CR. The appeal to specific over general is that the text specific to the dragon only limits spells maximum level. A lower level spell cast at a higher level expands to fill the slot ... That's not strong argument, but it's a way to apply specific over general to a wide open variant rule.



                    And this is a dragon. Who is to say that their spell level doesn't work like a warlock's? The DM.



                    This is a variant rule, its application will need to be adjudicated by the DM.



                    What ruling is more fun at your table? Discuss with your DM. It's a dragon - they named the game after these creatures.







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited 22 hours ago

























                    answered yesterday









                    KorvinStarmastKorvinStarmast

                    81.5k19256440




                    81.5k19256440







                    • 9




                      $begingroup$
                      @KorvinStarmast actually, it's pretty clear that the spells are cast at lowest level. The MM says on page 10 "A monster with the innate ability to cast spells has the Innate Spellcasting special trait. Unless noted otherwise, an innate spell of 1st level or higher is always cast at its lowest possible level and can't be cast at a higher level." The dragon doesn't explicitly have the Innate Spellcasting trait, but that's not necessary, because it implicitly has it due to "A young or older dragon can innately cast a number of spells ...". Therefore, no upcasting for innately casting dragons.
                      $endgroup$
                      – PixelMaster
                      yesterday






                    • 3




                      $begingroup$
                      You're free to approach the topic any way you want. However, in my opinion, the RAW is 100% unambiguous: the dragon is clearly supposed to have the Innate Spellcasting trait, and Innate Spellcasting doesn't allow upcasting. Your answer doesn't clearly express this in the beginning (or elsewhere), so I'm afraid that, as far as I'm concerned - your answer is currently incorrect.
                      $endgroup$
                      – PixelMaster
                      yesterday






                    • 2




                      $begingroup$
                      @PixelMaster You opinion is noted. Thanks for the feedback. RAF is a valid way to engage with the rules.
                      $endgroup$
                      – KorvinStarmast
                      yesterday







                    • 5




                      $begingroup$
                      sure, but there has to be a clear distinction what is RAW, what is RAI, and what is RAF. I don't disagree that it might be more fun to rule your way. As it is, I think your answer is a little unstructured and confusing, due to multiple edits (at least partly caused by my comments, I reckon). If you boil the content down to the central points, clearly mark which aspects are RAW/RAI/RAF, and improve the structure and readability, I think the answer would be significantly improved.
                      $endgroup$
                      – PixelMaster
                      yesterday







                    • 11




                      $begingroup$
                      @Spitemaster yes, they do, and that's precisely my point. The MM says on page 10: "A monster with the innate ability to cast spells has the Innate Spellcasting special trait." Since the variant rule states that "A young or older dragon can innately cast a number of spells", the logical conclusion is that, with the variant rule, dragons implicitly have the Innate Spellcasting trait.
                      $endgroup$
                      – PixelMaster
                      23 hours ago













                    • 9




                      $begingroup$
                      @KorvinStarmast actually, it's pretty clear that the spells are cast at lowest level. The MM says on page 10 "A monster with the innate ability to cast spells has the Innate Spellcasting special trait. Unless noted otherwise, an innate spell of 1st level or higher is always cast at its lowest possible level and can't be cast at a higher level." The dragon doesn't explicitly have the Innate Spellcasting trait, but that's not necessary, because it implicitly has it due to "A young or older dragon can innately cast a number of spells ...". Therefore, no upcasting for innately casting dragons.
                      $endgroup$
                      – PixelMaster
                      yesterday






                    • 3




                      $begingroup$
                      You're free to approach the topic any way you want. However, in my opinion, the RAW is 100% unambiguous: the dragon is clearly supposed to have the Innate Spellcasting trait, and Innate Spellcasting doesn't allow upcasting. Your answer doesn't clearly express this in the beginning (or elsewhere), so I'm afraid that, as far as I'm concerned - your answer is currently incorrect.
                      $endgroup$
                      – PixelMaster
                      yesterday






                    • 2




                      $begingroup$
                      @PixelMaster You opinion is noted. Thanks for the feedback. RAF is a valid way to engage with the rules.
                      $endgroup$
                      – KorvinStarmast
                      yesterday







                    • 5




                      $begingroup$
                      sure, but there has to be a clear distinction what is RAW, what is RAI, and what is RAF. I don't disagree that it might be more fun to rule your way. As it is, I think your answer is a little unstructured and confusing, due to multiple edits (at least partly caused by my comments, I reckon). If you boil the content down to the central points, clearly mark which aspects are RAW/RAI/RAF, and improve the structure and readability, I think the answer would be significantly improved.
                      $endgroup$
                      – PixelMaster
                      yesterday







                    • 11




                      $begingroup$
                      @Spitemaster yes, they do, and that's precisely my point. The MM says on page 10: "A monster with the innate ability to cast spells has the Innate Spellcasting special trait." Since the variant rule states that "A young or older dragon can innately cast a number of spells", the logical conclusion is that, with the variant rule, dragons implicitly have the Innate Spellcasting trait.
                      $endgroup$
                      – PixelMaster
                      23 hours ago








                    9




                    9




                    $begingroup$
                    @KorvinStarmast actually, it's pretty clear that the spells are cast at lowest level. The MM says on page 10 "A monster with the innate ability to cast spells has the Innate Spellcasting special trait. Unless noted otherwise, an innate spell of 1st level or higher is always cast at its lowest possible level and can't be cast at a higher level." The dragon doesn't explicitly have the Innate Spellcasting trait, but that's not necessary, because it implicitly has it due to "A young or older dragon can innately cast a number of spells ...". Therefore, no upcasting for innately casting dragons.
                    $endgroup$
                    – PixelMaster
                    yesterday




                    $begingroup$
                    @KorvinStarmast actually, it's pretty clear that the spells are cast at lowest level. The MM says on page 10 "A monster with the innate ability to cast spells has the Innate Spellcasting special trait. Unless noted otherwise, an innate spell of 1st level or higher is always cast at its lowest possible level and can't be cast at a higher level." The dragon doesn't explicitly have the Innate Spellcasting trait, but that's not necessary, because it implicitly has it due to "A young or older dragon can innately cast a number of spells ...". Therefore, no upcasting for innately casting dragons.
                    $endgroup$
                    – PixelMaster
                    yesterday




                    3




                    3




                    $begingroup$
                    You're free to approach the topic any way you want. However, in my opinion, the RAW is 100% unambiguous: the dragon is clearly supposed to have the Innate Spellcasting trait, and Innate Spellcasting doesn't allow upcasting. Your answer doesn't clearly express this in the beginning (or elsewhere), so I'm afraid that, as far as I'm concerned - your answer is currently incorrect.
                    $endgroup$
                    – PixelMaster
                    yesterday




                    $begingroup$
                    You're free to approach the topic any way you want. However, in my opinion, the RAW is 100% unambiguous: the dragon is clearly supposed to have the Innate Spellcasting trait, and Innate Spellcasting doesn't allow upcasting. Your answer doesn't clearly express this in the beginning (or elsewhere), so I'm afraid that, as far as I'm concerned - your answer is currently incorrect.
                    $endgroup$
                    – PixelMaster
                    yesterday




                    2




                    2




                    $begingroup$
                    @PixelMaster You opinion is noted. Thanks for the feedback. RAF is a valid way to engage with the rules.
                    $endgroup$
                    – KorvinStarmast
                    yesterday





                    $begingroup$
                    @PixelMaster You opinion is noted. Thanks for the feedback. RAF is a valid way to engage with the rules.
                    $endgroup$
                    – KorvinStarmast
                    yesterday





                    5




                    5




                    $begingroup$
                    sure, but there has to be a clear distinction what is RAW, what is RAI, and what is RAF. I don't disagree that it might be more fun to rule your way. As it is, I think your answer is a little unstructured and confusing, due to multiple edits (at least partly caused by my comments, I reckon). If you boil the content down to the central points, clearly mark which aspects are RAW/RAI/RAF, and improve the structure and readability, I think the answer would be significantly improved.
                    $endgroup$
                    – PixelMaster
                    yesterday





                    $begingroup$
                    sure, but there has to be a clear distinction what is RAW, what is RAI, and what is RAF. I don't disagree that it might be more fun to rule your way. As it is, I think your answer is a little unstructured and confusing, due to multiple edits (at least partly caused by my comments, I reckon). If you boil the content down to the central points, clearly mark which aspects are RAW/RAI/RAF, and improve the structure and readability, I think the answer would be significantly improved.
                    $endgroup$
                    – PixelMaster
                    yesterday





                    11




                    11




                    $begingroup$
                    @Spitemaster yes, they do, and that's precisely my point. The MM says on page 10: "A monster with the innate ability to cast spells has the Innate Spellcasting special trait." Since the variant rule states that "A young or older dragon can innately cast a number of spells", the logical conclusion is that, with the variant rule, dragons implicitly have the Innate Spellcasting trait.
                    $endgroup$
                    – PixelMaster
                    23 hours ago





                    $begingroup$
                    @Spitemaster yes, they do, and that's precisely my point. The MM says on page 10: "A monster with the innate ability to cast spells has the Innate Spellcasting special trait." Since the variant rule states that "A young or older dragon can innately cast a number of spells", the logical conclusion is that, with the variant rule, dragons implicitly have the Innate Spellcasting trait.
                    $endgroup$
                    – PixelMaster
                    23 hours ago


















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143126%2fat-what-level-can-a-dragon-innately-cast-its-spells%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Adding axes to figuresAdding axes labels to LaTeX figuresLaTeX equivalent of ConTeXt buffersRotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?adding axes to shapesAlign axes across subfiguresAdding figures with a certain orderLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themAdding axes labels to LaTeX figures

                    Tähtien Talli Jäsenet | Lähteet | NavigointivalikkoSuomen Hippos – Tähtien Talli

                    Do these cracks on my tires look bad? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowDry rot tire should I replace?Having to replace tiresFishtailed so easily? Bad tires? ABS?Filling the tires with something other than air, to avoid puncture hassles?Used Michelin tires safe to install?Do these tyre cracks necessitate replacement?Rumbling noise: tires or mechanicalIs it possible to fix noisy feathered tires?Are bad winter tires still better than summer tires in winter?Torque converter failure - Related to replacing only 2 tires?Why use snow tires on all 4 wheels on 2-wheel-drive cars?