How to find image of a complex function with given constraints? Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?What are the most common pitfalls awaiting new users?Draw the image of a complex regionFinding residues of multi-dimensional complex functionsMulti-dimensional integral in the complex plane with poles and essential singularityMinkowski sum and product of 2D-regionsFind regions in which the roots of a third degree polynomial are realHow to find function existence borderUsing MaxValue with complex argumentHow to maximize the modulus of a multivariate complex-valued function?Defining 3rd variable for parametricplot3D of two-variable complex functionHow to achieve faster performance on plotting complex valued functionsComplex continuation of an interpolated function
Unexpected result with right shift after bitwise negation
Did the new image of black hole confirm the general theory of relativity?
How to politely respond to generic emails requesting a PhD/job in my lab? Without wasting too much time
What to do with post with dry rot?
Stars Make Stars
How does modal jazz use chord progressions?
Mortgage adviser recommends a longer term than necessary combined with overpayments
Array/tabular for long multiplication
What did Darwin mean by 'squib' here?
What's the point in a preamp?
Fishing simulator
Limit for e and 1/e
Why is "Captain Marvel" translated as male in Portugal?
Complexity of many constant time steps with occasional logarithmic steps
Area of a 2D convex hull
Is there a documented rationale why the House Ways and Means chairman can demand tax info?
Are my PIs rude or am I just being too sensitive?
Blender game recording at the wrong time
Classification of bundles, Postnikov towers, obstruction theory, local coefficients
If A makes B more likely then B makes A more likely"
Is it possible to ask for a hotel room without minibar/extra services?
How to market an anarchic city as a tourism spot to people living in civilized areas?
Problem when applying foreach loop
I'm thinking of a number
How to find image of a complex function with given constraints?
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?What are the most common pitfalls awaiting new users?Draw the image of a complex regionFinding residues of multi-dimensional complex functionsMulti-dimensional integral in the complex plane with poles and essential singularityMinkowski sum and product of 2D-regionsFind regions in which the roots of a third degree polynomial are realHow to find function existence borderUsing MaxValue with complex argumentHow to maximize the modulus of a multivariate complex-valued function?Defining 3rd variable for parametricplot3D of two-variable complex functionHow to achieve faster performance on plotting complex valued functionsComplex continuation of an interpolated function
$begingroup$
I am very new to Mathematica. I have started learning it only last month. I would like to graph the image of some complex valued polynomials with some provided conditions. For example: $$ p(z_1,z_2,z_3)=z_1z_2^2 +z_2z_3+z_1z_3,$$ given that $|z_1|=1, |z_2|=2=|z_3|$.
graphics complex regions
$endgroup$
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I am very new to Mathematica. I have started learning it only last month. I would like to graph the image of some complex valued polynomials with some provided conditions. For example: $$ p(z_1,z_2,z_3)=z_1z_2^2 +z_2z_3+z_1z_3,$$ given that $|z_1|=1, |z_2|=2=|z_3|$.
graphics complex regions
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/30687/…
$endgroup$
– Alrubaie
Mar 31 at 16:41
3
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Draw the image of a complex region
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
Mar 31 at 17:22
1
$begingroup$
Do you want to draw the image or do you want a symbolic-algebraic description of the image?
$endgroup$
– Michael E2
Mar 31 at 18:48
1
$begingroup$
People here generally like users to post code as Mathematica code instead of just images or TeX, so they can copy-paste it. It makes it convenient for them and more likely you will get someone to help you. You may find this meta Q&A helpful
$endgroup$
– Michael E2
Mar 31 at 18:50
$begingroup$
@Michael E2, Great point! I've updated my answer to include the algebraic description as well. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 31 at 19:27
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I am very new to Mathematica. I have started learning it only last month. I would like to graph the image of some complex valued polynomials with some provided conditions. For example: $$ p(z_1,z_2,z_3)=z_1z_2^2 +z_2z_3+z_1z_3,$$ given that $|z_1|=1, |z_2|=2=|z_3|$.
graphics complex regions
$endgroup$
I am very new to Mathematica. I have started learning it only last month. I would like to graph the image of some complex valued polynomials with some provided conditions. For example: $$ p(z_1,z_2,z_3)=z_1z_2^2 +z_2z_3+z_1z_3,$$ given that $|z_1|=1, |z_2|=2=|z_3|$.
graphics complex regions
graphics complex regions
edited Apr 1 at 12:22
Michael E2
150k12203482
150k12203482
asked Mar 31 at 15:56
XYZABCXYZABC
1233
1233
1
$begingroup$
mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/30687/…
$endgroup$
– Alrubaie
Mar 31 at 16:41
3
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Draw the image of a complex region
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
Mar 31 at 17:22
1
$begingroup$
Do you want to draw the image or do you want a symbolic-algebraic description of the image?
$endgroup$
– Michael E2
Mar 31 at 18:48
1
$begingroup$
People here generally like users to post code as Mathematica code instead of just images or TeX, so they can copy-paste it. It makes it convenient for them and more likely you will get someone to help you. You may find this meta Q&A helpful
$endgroup$
– Michael E2
Mar 31 at 18:50
$begingroup$
@Michael E2, Great point! I've updated my answer to include the algebraic description as well. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 31 at 19:27
|
show 1 more comment
1
$begingroup$
mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/30687/…
$endgroup$
– Alrubaie
Mar 31 at 16:41
3
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Draw the image of a complex region
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
Mar 31 at 17:22
1
$begingroup$
Do you want to draw the image or do you want a symbolic-algebraic description of the image?
$endgroup$
– Michael E2
Mar 31 at 18:48
1
$begingroup$
People here generally like users to post code as Mathematica code instead of just images or TeX, so they can copy-paste it. It makes it convenient for them and more likely you will get someone to help you. You may find this meta Q&A helpful
$endgroup$
– Michael E2
Mar 31 at 18:50
$begingroup$
@Michael E2, Great point! I've updated my answer to include the algebraic description as well. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 31 at 19:27
1
1
$begingroup$
mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/30687/…
$endgroup$
– Alrubaie
Mar 31 at 16:41
$begingroup$
mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/30687/…
$endgroup$
– Alrubaie
Mar 31 at 16:41
3
3
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Draw the image of a complex region
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
Mar 31 at 17:22
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Draw the image of a complex region
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
Mar 31 at 17:22
1
1
$begingroup$
Do you want to draw the image or do you want a symbolic-algebraic description of the image?
$endgroup$
– Michael E2
Mar 31 at 18:48
$begingroup$
Do you want to draw the image or do you want a symbolic-algebraic description of the image?
$endgroup$
– Michael E2
Mar 31 at 18:48
1
1
$begingroup$
People here generally like users to post code as Mathematica code instead of just images or TeX, so they can copy-paste it. It makes it convenient for them and more likely you will get someone to help you. You may find this meta Q&A helpful
$endgroup$
– Michael E2
Mar 31 at 18:50
$begingroup$
People here generally like users to post code as Mathematica code instead of just images or TeX, so they can copy-paste it. It makes it convenient for them and more likely you will get someone to help you. You may find this meta Q&A helpful
$endgroup$
– Michael E2
Mar 31 at 18:50
$begingroup$
@Michael E2, Great point! I've updated my answer to include the algebraic description as well. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 31 at 19:27
$begingroup$
@Michael E2, Great point! I've updated my answer to include the algebraic description as well. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 31 at 19:27
|
show 1 more comment
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
On the boundary of the image the Jacobian will be singular:
Clear[r, s, t, u, v, w];
Block[z1 = Exp[I r], z2 = 2 Exp[I s], z3 = 2 Exp[I t],
expr = ComplexExpand[ReIm[z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3]]]
(* 4 Cos[r+2 s]+2 Cos[r+t]+4 Cos[s+t], 4 Sin[r+2 s]+2 Sin[r+t]+4 Sin[s+t] *)
sub = r + t -> u, s + t -> v, r + 2 s -> w;(* see simplified Jacobian *)
jac = D[expr, r, s, t]; (* Jacobian is 2 x 3 *)
singRST = Equal @@ Divide @@ jac // Simplify (* Singular if rows are proportional *)
singUVW = singRST /. sub // Simplify
(* Solve cannot solve the system, unless we cut it into bite-size pieces *)
solv = Solve[singUVW[[;; 2]], v] /. C[1] -> 0;
singUW = singUVW[[2 ;;]] /. solv // Simplify;
solu = Solve[#, u] & /@ singUW;
(*
-((2 Sin[r + 2 s] + Sin[r + t])/(2 Cos[r + 2 s] + Cos[r + t])) ==
-((2 Sin[r + 2 s] + Sin[s + t])/(2 Cos[r + 2 s] + Cos[s + t])) ==
-((Sin[r + t] + 2 Sin[s + t])/(Cos[r + t] + 2 Cos[s + t]))
-((Sin[u] + 2 Sin[w])/(Cos[u] + 2 Cos[w])) ==
-((Sin[v] + 2 Sin[w])/(Cos[v] + 2 Cos[w])) ==
-((Sin[u] + 2 Sin[v])/(Cos[u] + 2 Cos[v]))
*)
(* fix sub so that it works on a general expression *)
invsub = First@Solve[Equal @@@ sub, u, v, w];
sub = First@Solve[Equal @@@ invsub, r, s, t];
(*some u solutions are complex*)
realu = List /@ Cases[Flatten@solu, _?(FreeQ[#, Complex] &)];
boundaries = PiecewiseExpand /@
Simplify[
TrigExpand@Simplify[Simplify[expr /. sub] /. solv] /. realu //
Flatten[#, 1] &, 0 <= w < 2 Pi];
ParametricPlot[boundaries // Evaluate, w, 0, 2 Pi]
Well, it's only a start, since you have to check in the interior boundaries to see whether they might be holes. But @HenrikSchumacher has done that already.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Amazing idea to look for critical points of the Jacobian. Good job!
$endgroup$
– Henrik Schumacher
Mar 31 at 20:55
$begingroup$
In my Mathematica do I have to load some packages as I am not getting any graph?
$endgroup$
– XYZABC
Apr 1 at 4:59
$begingroup$
@XYZ, did you try running it in a newly opened Mathematica notebook? If it didn't work there, please mention what version number you are using.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is away♦
Apr 1 at 6:46
$begingroup$
@XYZABC It seems there may have been two problems. Copying and pasting from the site to M messed up some newlines, which changed the meaning of%
. The other was that I added a line but put it in out of order in the edit. I've removed all the%
and replaced them with variables. It should be fixed now.
$endgroup$
– Michael E2
Apr 1 at 11:46
$begingroup$
Could you please explain me the code singRST = Equal @@ Divide @@ jac // Simplify Or maybe give me some reference so that I can go through it.
$endgroup$
– XYZABC
Apr 1 at 14:39
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
By letting $z_1,z_2,z_3$ trace out circles, we can see some beautiful curves that live within that blob!
p[z1_, z2_, z3_] := z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3;
q[t_][a1_, a2_, b1_, b2_, c1_, c2_] :=
p[Exp[ I (a1 t + a2)], 2 Exp[ I (b1 t + b2)], 2 Exp[ I (c1 t + c2)]];
Manipulate[
ParametricPlot[Re[q[ t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]],
Im[q[ t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]], t, 0, 2 [Pi],
Axes -> False, Frame -> True, PlotRange -> -12, 12,-12, 12],
a1, -5, 5,a2, 0, 2 [Pi],b1, -5, 5,b2, 0, 2 [Pi],
c1, -5, 5,c2, 0, 2 [Pi]]
Here is a look at the analytical form of these curves:
Manipulate[
ComplexExpand@ReIm[q[t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]],
a1, -5, 5, a2, 0, 2 [Pi], b1, -5, 5, b2, 0, 2 [Pi],
c1, -5, 5, c2, 0, 2 [Pi]]
or
Manipulate[
FullSimplify[q[t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]], a1, -5, 5, a2, 0,
2 [Pi], b1, -5, 5, b2, 0, 2 [Pi], c1, -5, 5, c2, 0, 2 [Pi]]
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Not very elegant, but this might give you a coarse idea.
z1 = Exp[I r];
z2 = 2 Exp[I s];
z3 = 2 Exp[I t];
expr = ComplexExpand[ReIm[z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3]];
f = r, s, t [Function] Evaluate[expr];
R = DiscretizeRegion[Cuboid[-1, -1, -1 Pi, 1, 1, 1 Pi],
MaxCellMeasure -> 0.0125];
pts = f @@@ MeshCoordinates[R];
triangles = MeshCells[R, 2, "Multicells" -> True][[1]];
Graphics[
Red, Disk[0, 0, 10],
FaceForm[Black], EdgeForm[Thin],
GraphicsComplex[pts, triangles]
,
Axes -> True
]
Could be the disk of radius 10...
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The image is clearly a subset of the disk of radius 10. Perhaps somebody could prove that this is the region or show a point that is not included.
$endgroup$
– mjw
Apr 1 at 16:41
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here's another numerical approach, similar to @Henrik's, but without the mesh overhead. It can be generalized to more variables easily. It requires some manual intervention to code the constraints on the variables.
poly = z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3;
vars = Variables[poly];
constrVars = Thread[vars -> 1, 2, 2 Array[Exp[I #] &@*Slot, Length@vars]]
(* z1 -> E^(I #1), z2 -> 2 E^(I #2), z3 -> 2 E^(I #3) *)
polyFN = poly /. constrVars // Evaluate // Function;
Graphics[
PointSize[Tiny],
polyFN @@ RandomReal[0, 2 Pi, Length@vars, 5 10^4] // ReIm // Point,
Frame -> True]
We can see ghosts of some of the boundaries
in my other answer.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "387"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194320%2fhow-to-find-image-of-a-complex-function-with-given-constraints%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
On the boundary of the image the Jacobian will be singular:
Clear[r, s, t, u, v, w];
Block[z1 = Exp[I r], z2 = 2 Exp[I s], z3 = 2 Exp[I t],
expr = ComplexExpand[ReIm[z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3]]]
(* 4 Cos[r+2 s]+2 Cos[r+t]+4 Cos[s+t], 4 Sin[r+2 s]+2 Sin[r+t]+4 Sin[s+t] *)
sub = r + t -> u, s + t -> v, r + 2 s -> w;(* see simplified Jacobian *)
jac = D[expr, r, s, t]; (* Jacobian is 2 x 3 *)
singRST = Equal @@ Divide @@ jac // Simplify (* Singular if rows are proportional *)
singUVW = singRST /. sub // Simplify
(* Solve cannot solve the system, unless we cut it into bite-size pieces *)
solv = Solve[singUVW[[;; 2]], v] /. C[1] -> 0;
singUW = singUVW[[2 ;;]] /. solv // Simplify;
solu = Solve[#, u] & /@ singUW;
(*
-((2 Sin[r + 2 s] + Sin[r + t])/(2 Cos[r + 2 s] + Cos[r + t])) ==
-((2 Sin[r + 2 s] + Sin[s + t])/(2 Cos[r + 2 s] + Cos[s + t])) ==
-((Sin[r + t] + 2 Sin[s + t])/(Cos[r + t] + 2 Cos[s + t]))
-((Sin[u] + 2 Sin[w])/(Cos[u] + 2 Cos[w])) ==
-((Sin[v] + 2 Sin[w])/(Cos[v] + 2 Cos[w])) ==
-((Sin[u] + 2 Sin[v])/(Cos[u] + 2 Cos[v]))
*)
(* fix sub so that it works on a general expression *)
invsub = First@Solve[Equal @@@ sub, u, v, w];
sub = First@Solve[Equal @@@ invsub, r, s, t];
(*some u solutions are complex*)
realu = List /@ Cases[Flatten@solu, _?(FreeQ[#, Complex] &)];
boundaries = PiecewiseExpand /@
Simplify[
TrigExpand@Simplify[Simplify[expr /. sub] /. solv] /. realu //
Flatten[#, 1] &, 0 <= w < 2 Pi];
ParametricPlot[boundaries // Evaluate, w, 0, 2 Pi]
Well, it's only a start, since you have to check in the interior boundaries to see whether they might be holes. But @HenrikSchumacher has done that already.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Amazing idea to look for critical points of the Jacobian. Good job!
$endgroup$
– Henrik Schumacher
Mar 31 at 20:55
$begingroup$
In my Mathematica do I have to load some packages as I am not getting any graph?
$endgroup$
– XYZABC
Apr 1 at 4:59
$begingroup$
@XYZ, did you try running it in a newly opened Mathematica notebook? If it didn't work there, please mention what version number you are using.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is away♦
Apr 1 at 6:46
$begingroup$
@XYZABC It seems there may have been two problems. Copying and pasting from the site to M messed up some newlines, which changed the meaning of%
. The other was that I added a line but put it in out of order in the edit. I've removed all the%
and replaced them with variables. It should be fixed now.
$endgroup$
– Michael E2
Apr 1 at 11:46
$begingroup$
Could you please explain me the code singRST = Equal @@ Divide @@ jac // Simplify Or maybe give me some reference so that I can go through it.
$endgroup$
– XYZABC
Apr 1 at 14:39
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
On the boundary of the image the Jacobian will be singular:
Clear[r, s, t, u, v, w];
Block[z1 = Exp[I r], z2 = 2 Exp[I s], z3 = 2 Exp[I t],
expr = ComplexExpand[ReIm[z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3]]]
(* 4 Cos[r+2 s]+2 Cos[r+t]+4 Cos[s+t], 4 Sin[r+2 s]+2 Sin[r+t]+4 Sin[s+t] *)
sub = r + t -> u, s + t -> v, r + 2 s -> w;(* see simplified Jacobian *)
jac = D[expr, r, s, t]; (* Jacobian is 2 x 3 *)
singRST = Equal @@ Divide @@ jac // Simplify (* Singular if rows are proportional *)
singUVW = singRST /. sub // Simplify
(* Solve cannot solve the system, unless we cut it into bite-size pieces *)
solv = Solve[singUVW[[;; 2]], v] /. C[1] -> 0;
singUW = singUVW[[2 ;;]] /. solv // Simplify;
solu = Solve[#, u] & /@ singUW;
(*
-((2 Sin[r + 2 s] + Sin[r + t])/(2 Cos[r + 2 s] + Cos[r + t])) ==
-((2 Sin[r + 2 s] + Sin[s + t])/(2 Cos[r + 2 s] + Cos[s + t])) ==
-((Sin[r + t] + 2 Sin[s + t])/(Cos[r + t] + 2 Cos[s + t]))
-((Sin[u] + 2 Sin[w])/(Cos[u] + 2 Cos[w])) ==
-((Sin[v] + 2 Sin[w])/(Cos[v] + 2 Cos[w])) ==
-((Sin[u] + 2 Sin[v])/(Cos[u] + 2 Cos[v]))
*)
(* fix sub so that it works on a general expression *)
invsub = First@Solve[Equal @@@ sub, u, v, w];
sub = First@Solve[Equal @@@ invsub, r, s, t];
(*some u solutions are complex*)
realu = List /@ Cases[Flatten@solu, _?(FreeQ[#, Complex] &)];
boundaries = PiecewiseExpand /@
Simplify[
TrigExpand@Simplify[Simplify[expr /. sub] /. solv] /. realu //
Flatten[#, 1] &, 0 <= w < 2 Pi];
ParametricPlot[boundaries // Evaluate, w, 0, 2 Pi]
Well, it's only a start, since you have to check in the interior boundaries to see whether they might be holes. But @HenrikSchumacher has done that already.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Amazing idea to look for critical points of the Jacobian. Good job!
$endgroup$
– Henrik Schumacher
Mar 31 at 20:55
$begingroup$
In my Mathematica do I have to load some packages as I am not getting any graph?
$endgroup$
– XYZABC
Apr 1 at 4:59
$begingroup$
@XYZ, did you try running it in a newly opened Mathematica notebook? If it didn't work there, please mention what version number you are using.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is away♦
Apr 1 at 6:46
$begingroup$
@XYZABC It seems there may have been two problems. Copying and pasting from the site to M messed up some newlines, which changed the meaning of%
. The other was that I added a line but put it in out of order in the edit. I've removed all the%
and replaced them with variables. It should be fixed now.
$endgroup$
– Michael E2
Apr 1 at 11:46
$begingroup$
Could you please explain me the code singRST = Equal @@ Divide @@ jac // Simplify Or maybe give me some reference so that I can go through it.
$endgroup$
– XYZABC
Apr 1 at 14:39
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
On the boundary of the image the Jacobian will be singular:
Clear[r, s, t, u, v, w];
Block[z1 = Exp[I r], z2 = 2 Exp[I s], z3 = 2 Exp[I t],
expr = ComplexExpand[ReIm[z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3]]]
(* 4 Cos[r+2 s]+2 Cos[r+t]+4 Cos[s+t], 4 Sin[r+2 s]+2 Sin[r+t]+4 Sin[s+t] *)
sub = r + t -> u, s + t -> v, r + 2 s -> w;(* see simplified Jacobian *)
jac = D[expr, r, s, t]; (* Jacobian is 2 x 3 *)
singRST = Equal @@ Divide @@ jac // Simplify (* Singular if rows are proportional *)
singUVW = singRST /. sub // Simplify
(* Solve cannot solve the system, unless we cut it into bite-size pieces *)
solv = Solve[singUVW[[;; 2]], v] /. C[1] -> 0;
singUW = singUVW[[2 ;;]] /. solv // Simplify;
solu = Solve[#, u] & /@ singUW;
(*
-((2 Sin[r + 2 s] + Sin[r + t])/(2 Cos[r + 2 s] + Cos[r + t])) ==
-((2 Sin[r + 2 s] + Sin[s + t])/(2 Cos[r + 2 s] + Cos[s + t])) ==
-((Sin[r + t] + 2 Sin[s + t])/(Cos[r + t] + 2 Cos[s + t]))
-((Sin[u] + 2 Sin[w])/(Cos[u] + 2 Cos[w])) ==
-((Sin[v] + 2 Sin[w])/(Cos[v] + 2 Cos[w])) ==
-((Sin[u] + 2 Sin[v])/(Cos[u] + 2 Cos[v]))
*)
(* fix sub so that it works on a general expression *)
invsub = First@Solve[Equal @@@ sub, u, v, w];
sub = First@Solve[Equal @@@ invsub, r, s, t];
(*some u solutions are complex*)
realu = List /@ Cases[Flatten@solu, _?(FreeQ[#, Complex] &)];
boundaries = PiecewiseExpand /@
Simplify[
TrigExpand@Simplify[Simplify[expr /. sub] /. solv] /. realu //
Flatten[#, 1] &, 0 <= w < 2 Pi];
ParametricPlot[boundaries // Evaluate, w, 0, 2 Pi]
Well, it's only a start, since you have to check in the interior boundaries to see whether they might be holes. But @HenrikSchumacher has done that already.
$endgroup$
On the boundary of the image the Jacobian will be singular:
Clear[r, s, t, u, v, w];
Block[z1 = Exp[I r], z2 = 2 Exp[I s], z3 = 2 Exp[I t],
expr = ComplexExpand[ReIm[z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3]]]
(* 4 Cos[r+2 s]+2 Cos[r+t]+4 Cos[s+t], 4 Sin[r+2 s]+2 Sin[r+t]+4 Sin[s+t] *)
sub = r + t -> u, s + t -> v, r + 2 s -> w;(* see simplified Jacobian *)
jac = D[expr, r, s, t]; (* Jacobian is 2 x 3 *)
singRST = Equal @@ Divide @@ jac // Simplify (* Singular if rows are proportional *)
singUVW = singRST /. sub // Simplify
(* Solve cannot solve the system, unless we cut it into bite-size pieces *)
solv = Solve[singUVW[[;; 2]], v] /. C[1] -> 0;
singUW = singUVW[[2 ;;]] /. solv // Simplify;
solu = Solve[#, u] & /@ singUW;
(*
-((2 Sin[r + 2 s] + Sin[r + t])/(2 Cos[r + 2 s] + Cos[r + t])) ==
-((2 Sin[r + 2 s] + Sin[s + t])/(2 Cos[r + 2 s] + Cos[s + t])) ==
-((Sin[r + t] + 2 Sin[s + t])/(Cos[r + t] + 2 Cos[s + t]))
-((Sin[u] + 2 Sin[w])/(Cos[u] + 2 Cos[w])) ==
-((Sin[v] + 2 Sin[w])/(Cos[v] + 2 Cos[w])) ==
-((Sin[u] + 2 Sin[v])/(Cos[u] + 2 Cos[v]))
*)
(* fix sub so that it works on a general expression *)
invsub = First@Solve[Equal @@@ sub, u, v, w];
sub = First@Solve[Equal @@@ invsub, r, s, t];
(*some u solutions are complex*)
realu = List /@ Cases[Flatten@solu, _?(FreeQ[#, Complex] &)];
boundaries = PiecewiseExpand /@
Simplify[
TrigExpand@Simplify[Simplify[expr /. sub] /. solv] /. realu //
Flatten[#, 1] &, 0 <= w < 2 Pi];
ParametricPlot[boundaries // Evaluate, w, 0, 2 Pi]
Well, it's only a start, since you have to check in the interior boundaries to see whether they might be holes. But @HenrikSchumacher has done that already.
edited Apr 1 at 12:28
answered Mar 31 at 20:32
Michael E2Michael E2
150k12203482
150k12203482
$begingroup$
Amazing idea to look for critical points of the Jacobian. Good job!
$endgroup$
– Henrik Schumacher
Mar 31 at 20:55
$begingroup$
In my Mathematica do I have to load some packages as I am not getting any graph?
$endgroup$
– XYZABC
Apr 1 at 4:59
$begingroup$
@XYZ, did you try running it in a newly opened Mathematica notebook? If it didn't work there, please mention what version number you are using.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is away♦
Apr 1 at 6:46
$begingroup$
@XYZABC It seems there may have been two problems. Copying and pasting from the site to M messed up some newlines, which changed the meaning of%
. The other was that I added a line but put it in out of order in the edit. I've removed all the%
and replaced them with variables. It should be fixed now.
$endgroup$
– Michael E2
Apr 1 at 11:46
$begingroup$
Could you please explain me the code singRST = Equal @@ Divide @@ jac // Simplify Or maybe give me some reference so that I can go through it.
$endgroup$
– XYZABC
Apr 1 at 14:39
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Amazing idea to look for critical points of the Jacobian. Good job!
$endgroup$
– Henrik Schumacher
Mar 31 at 20:55
$begingroup$
In my Mathematica do I have to load some packages as I am not getting any graph?
$endgroup$
– XYZABC
Apr 1 at 4:59
$begingroup$
@XYZ, did you try running it in a newly opened Mathematica notebook? If it didn't work there, please mention what version number you are using.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is away♦
Apr 1 at 6:46
$begingroup$
@XYZABC It seems there may have been two problems. Copying and pasting from the site to M messed up some newlines, which changed the meaning of%
. The other was that I added a line but put it in out of order in the edit. I've removed all the%
and replaced them with variables. It should be fixed now.
$endgroup$
– Michael E2
Apr 1 at 11:46
$begingroup$
Could you please explain me the code singRST = Equal @@ Divide @@ jac // Simplify Or maybe give me some reference so that I can go through it.
$endgroup$
– XYZABC
Apr 1 at 14:39
$begingroup$
Amazing idea to look for critical points of the Jacobian. Good job!
$endgroup$
– Henrik Schumacher
Mar 31 at 20:55
$begingroup$
Amazing idea to look for critical points of the Jacobian. Good job!
$endgroup$
– Henrik Schumacher
Mar 31 at 20:55
$begingroup$
In my Mathematica do I have to load some packages as I am not getting any graph?
$endgroup$
– XYZABC
Apr 1 at 4:59
$begingroup$
In my Mathematica do I have to load some packages as I am not getting any graph?
$endgroup$
– XYZABC
Apr 1 at 4:59
$begingroup$
@XYZ, did you try running it in a newly opened Mathematica notebook? If it didn't work there, please mention what version number you are using.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is away♦
Apr 1 at 6:46
$begingroup$
@XYZ, did you try running it in a newly opened Mathematica notebook? If it didn't work there, please mention what version number you are using.
$endgroup$
– J. M. is away♦
Apr 1 at 6:46
$begingroup$
@XYZABC It seems there may have been two problems. Copying and pasting from the site to M messed up some newlines, which changed the meaning of
%
. The other was that I added a line but put it in out of order in the edit. I've removed all the %
and replaced them with variables. It should be fixed now.$endgroup$
– Michael E2
Apr 1 at 11:46
$begingroup$
@XYZABC It seems there may have been two problems. Copying and pasting from the site to M messed up some newlines, which changed the meaning of
%
. The other was that I added a line but put it in out of order in the edit. I've removed all the %
and replaced them with variables. It should be fixed now.$endgroup$
– Michael E2
Apr 1 at 11:46
$begingroup$
Could you please explain me the code singRST = Equal @@ Divide @@ jac // Simplify Or maybe give me some reference so that I can go through it.
$endgroup$
– XYZABC
Apr 1 at 14:39
$begingroup$
Could you please explain me the code singRST = Equal @@ Divide @@ jac // Simplify Or maybe give me some reference so that I can go through it.
$endgroup$
– XYZABC
Apr 1 at 14:39
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
By letting $z_1,z_2,z_3$ trace out circles, we can see some beautiful curves that live within that blob!
p[z1_, z2_, z3_] := z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3;
q[t_][a1_, a2_, b1_, b2_, c1_, c2_] :=
p[Exp[ I (a1 t + a2)], 2 Exp[ I (b1 t + b2)], 2 Exp[ I (c1 t + c2)]];
Manipulate[
ParametricPlot[Re[q[ t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]],
Im[q[ t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]], t, 0, 2 [Pi],
Axes -> False, Frame -> True, PlotRange -> -12, 12,-12, 12],
a1, -5, 5,a2, 0, 2 [Pi],b1, -5, 5,b2, 0, 2 [Pi],
c1, -5, 5,c2, 0, 2 [Pi]]
Here is a look at the analytical form of these curves:
Manipulate[
ComplexExpand@ReIm[q[t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]],
a1, -5, 5, a2, 0, 2 [Pi], b1, -5, 5, b2, 0, 2 [Pi],
c1, -5, 5, c2, 0, 2 [Pi]]
or
Manipulate[
FullSimplify[q[t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]], a1, -5, 5, a2, 0,
2 [Pi], b1, -5, 5, b2, 0, 2 [Pi], c1, -5, 5, c2, 0, 2 [Pi]]
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
By letting $z_1,z_2,z_3$ trace out circles, we can see some beautiful curves that live within that blob!
p[z1_, z2_, z3_] := z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3;
q[t_][a1_, a2_, b1_, b2_, c1_, c2_] :=
p[Exp[ I (a1 t + a2)], 2 Exp[ I (b1 t + b2)], 2 Exp[ I (c1 t + c2)]];
Manipulate[
ParametricPlot[Re[q[ t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]],
Im[q[ t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]], t, 0, 2 [Pi],
Axes -> False, Frame -> True, PlotRange -> -12, 12,-12, 12],
a1, -5, 5,a2, 0, 2 [Pi],b1, -5, 5,b2, 0, 2 [Pi],
c1, -5, 5,c2, 0, 2 [Pi]]
Here is a look at the analytical form of these curves:
Manipulate[
ComplexExpand@ReIm[q[t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]],
a1, -5, 5, a2, 0, 2 [Pi], b1, -5, 5, b2, 0, 2 [Pi],
c1, -5, 5, c2, 0, 2 [Pi]]
or
Manipulate[
FullSimplify[q[t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]], a1, -5, 5, a2, 0,
2 [Pi], b1, -5, 5, b2, 0, 2 [Pi], c1, -5, 5, c2, 0, 2 [Pi]]
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
By letting $z_1,z_2,z_3$ trace out circles, we can see some beautiful curves that live within that blob!
p[z1_, z2_, z3_] := z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3;
q[t_][a1_, a2_, b1_, b2_, c1_, c2_] :=
p[Exp[ I (a1 t + a2)], 2 Exp[ I (b1 t + b2)], 2 Exp[ I (c1 t + c2)]];
Manipulate[
ParametricPlot[Re[q[ t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]],
Im[q[ t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]], t, 0, 2 [Pi],
Axes -> False, Frame -> True, PlotRange -> -12, 12,-12, 12],
a1, -5, 5,a2, 0, 2 [Pi],b1, -5, 5,b2, 0, 2 [Pi],
c1, -5, 5,c2, 0, 2 [Pi]]
Here is a look at the analytical form of these curves:
Manipulate[
ComplexExpand@ReIm[q[t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]],
a1, -5, 5, a2, 0, 2 [Pi], b1, -5, 5, b2, 0, 2 [Pi],
c1, -5, 5, c2, 0, 2 [Pi]]
or
Manipulate[
FullSimplify[q[t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]], a1, -5, 5, a2, 0,
2 [Pi], b1, -5, 5, b2, 0, 2 [Pi], c1, -5, 5, c2, 0, 2 [Pi]]
$endgroup$
By letting $z_1,z_2,z_3$ trace out circles, we can see some beautiful curves that live within that blob!
p[z1_, z2_, z3_] := z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3;
q[t_][a1_, a2_, b1_, b2_, c1_, c2_] :=
p[Exp[ I (a1 t + a2)], 2 Exp[ I (b1 t + b2)], 2 Exp[ I (c1 t + c2)]];
Manipulate[
ParametricPlot[Re[q[ t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]],
Im[q[ t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]], t, 0, 2 [Pi],
Axes -> False, Frame -> True, PlotRange -> -12, 12,-12, 12],
a1, -5, 5,a2, 0, 2 [Pi],b1, -5, 5,b2, 0, 2 [Pi],
c1, -5, 5,c2, 0, 2 [Pi]]
Here is a look at the analytical form of these curves:
Manipulate[
ComplexExpand@ReIm[q[t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]],
a1, -5, 5, a2, 0, 2 [Pi], b1, -5, 5, b2, 0, 2 [Pi],
c1, -5, 5, c2, 0, 2 [Pi]]
or
Manipulate[
FullSimplify[q[t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]], a1, -5, 5, a2, 0,
2 [Pi], b1, -5, 5, b2, 0, 2 [Pi], c1, -5, 5, c2, 0, 2 [Pi]]
edited Mar 31 at 20:20
answered Mar 31 at 20:11
mjwmjw
1,29010
1,29010
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Not very elegant, but this might give you a coarse idea.
z1 = Exp[I r];
z2 = 2 Exp[I s];
z3 = 2 Exp[I t];
expr = ComplexExpand[ReIm[z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3]];
f = r, s, t [Function] Evaluate[expr];
R = DiscretizeRegion[Cuboid[-1, -1, -1 Pi, 1, 1, 1 Pi],
MaxCellMeasure -> 0.0125];
pts = f @@@ MeshCoordinates[R];
triangles = MeshCells[R, 2, "Multicells" -> True][[1]];
Graphics[
Red, Disk[0, 0, 10],
FaceForm[Black], EdgeForm[Thin],
GraphicsComplex[pts, triangles]
,
Axes -> True
]
Could be the disk of radius 10...
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The image is clearly a subset of the disk of radius 10. Perhaps somebody could prove that this is the region or show a point that is not included.
$endgroup$
– mjw
Apr 1 at 16:41
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Not very elegant, but this might give you a coarse idea.
z1 = Exp[I r];
z2 = 2 Exp[I s];
z3 = 2 Exp[I t];
expr = ComplexExpand[ReIm[z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3]];
f = r, s, t [Function] Evaluate[expr];
R = DiscretizeRegion[Cuboid[-1, -1, -1 Pi, 1, 1, 1 Pi],
MaxCellMeasure -> 0.0125];
pts = f @@@ MeshCoordinates[R];
triangles = MeshCells[R, 2, "Multicells" -> True][[1]];
Graphics[
Red, Disk[0, 0, 10],
FaceForm[Black], EdgeForm[Thin],
GraphicsComplex[pts, triangles]
,
Axes -> True
]
Could be the disk of radius 10...
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
The image is clearly a subset of the disk of radius 10. Perhaps somebody could prove that this is the region or show a point that is not included.
$endgroup$
– mjw
Apr 1 at 16:41
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Not very elegant, but this might give you a coarse idea.
z1 = Exp[I r];
z2 = 2 Exp[I s];
z3 = 2 Exp[I t];
expr = ComplexExpand[ReIm[z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3]];
f = r, s, t [Function] Evaluate[expr];
R = DiscretizeRegion[Cuboid[-1, -1, -1 Pi, 1, 1, 1 Pi],
MaxCellMeasure -> 0.0125];
pts = f @@@ MeshCoordinates[R];
triangles = MeshCells[R, 2, "Multicells" -> True][[1]];
Graphics[
Red, Disk[0, 0, 10],
FaceForm[Black], EdgeForm[Thin],
GraphicsComplex[pts, triangles]
,
Axes -> True
]
Could be the disk of radius 10...
$endgroup$
Not very elegant, but this might give you a coarse idea.
z1 = Exp[I r];
z2 = 2 Exp[I s];
z3 = 2 Exp[I t];
expr = ComplexExpand[ReIm[z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3]];
f = r, s, t [Function] Evaluate[expr];
R = DiscretizeRegion[Cuboid[-1, -1, -1 Pi, 1, 1, 1 Pi],
MaxCellMeasure -> 0.0125];
pts = f @@@ MeshCoordinates[R];
triangles = MeshCells[R, 2, "Multicells" -> True][[1]];
Graphics[
Red, Disk[0, 0, 10],
FaceForm[Black], EdgeForm[Thin],
GraphicsComplex[pts, triangles]
,
Axes -> True
]
Could be the disk of radius 10...
edited Mar 31 at 20:55
answered Mar 31 at 19:29
Henrik SchumacherHenrik Schumacher
60.2k582169
60.2k582169
$begingroup$
The image is clearly a subset of the disk of radius 10. Perhaps somebody could prove that this is the region or show a point that is not included.
$endgroup$
– mjw
Apr 1 at 16:41
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The image is clearly a subset of the disk of radius 10. Perhaps somebody could prove that this is the region or show a point that is not included.
$endgroup$
– mjw
Apr 1 at 16:41
$begingroup$
The image is clearly a subset of the disk of radius 10. Perhaps somebody could prove that this is the region or show a point that is not included.
$endgroup$
– mjw
Apr 1 at 16:41
$begingroup$
The image is clearly a subset of the disk of radius 10. Perhaps somebody could prove that this is the region or show a point that is not included.
$endgroup$
– mjw
Apr 1 at 16:41
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here's another numerical approach, similar to @Henrik's, but without the mesh overhead. It can be generalized to more variables easily. It requires some manual intervention to code the constraints on the variables.
poly = z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3;
vars = Variables[poly];
constrVars = Thread[vars -> 1, 2, 2 Array[Exp[I #] &@*Slot, Length@vars]]
(* z1 -> E^(I #1), z2 -> 2 E^(I #2), z3 -> 2 E^(I #3) *)
polyFN = poly /. constrVars // Evaluate // Function;
Graphics[
PointSize[Tiny],
polyFN @@ RandomReal[0, 2 Pi, Length@vars, 5 10^4] // ReIm // Point,
Frame -> True]
We can see ghosts of some of the boundaries
in my other answer.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here's another numerical approach, similar to @Henrik's, but without the mesh overhead. It can be generalized to more variables easily. It requires some manual intervention to code the constraints on the variables.
poly = z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3;
vars = Variables[poly];
constrVars = Thread[vars -> 1, 2, 2 Array[Exp[I #] &@*Slot, Length@vars]]
(* z1 -> E^(I #1), z2 -> 2 E^(I #2), z3 -> 2 E^(I #3) *)
polyFN = poly /. constrVars // Evaluate // Function;
Graphics[
PointSize[Tiny],
polyFN @@ RandomReal[0, 2 Pi, Length@vars, 5 10^4] // ReIm // Point,
Frame -> True]
We can see ghosts of some of the boundaries
in my other answer.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here's another numerical approach, similar to @Henrik's, but without the mesh overhead. It can be generalized to more variables easily. It requires some manual intervention to code the constraints on the variables.
poly = z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3;
vars = Variables[poly];
constrVars = Thread[vars -> 1, 2, 2 Array[Exp[I #] &@*Slot, Length@vars]]
(* z1 -> E^(I #1), z2 -> 2 E^(I #2), z3 -> 2 E^(I #3) *)
polyFN = poly /. constrVars // Evaluate // Function;
Graphics[
PointSize[Tiny],
polyFN @@ RandomReal[0, 2 Pi, Length@vars, 5 10^4] // ReIm // Point,
Frame -> True]
We can see ghosts of some of the boundaries
in my other answer.
$endgroup$
Here's another numerical approach, similar to @Henrik's, but without the mesh overhead. It can be generalized to more variables easily. It requires some manual intervention to code the constraints on the variables.
poly = z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3;
vars = Variables[poly];
constrVars = Thread[vars -> 1, 2, 2 Array[Exp[I #] &@*Slot, Length@vars]]
(* z1 -> E^(I #1), z2 -> 2 E^(I #2), z3 -> 2 E^(I #3) *)
polyFN = poly /. constrVars // Evaluate // Function;
Graphics[
PointSize[Tiny],
polyFN @@ RandomReal[0, 2 Pi, Length@vars, 5 10^4] // ReIm // Point,
Frame -> True]
We can see ghosts of some of the boundaries
in my other answer.
answered Apr 1 at 12:12
Michael E2Michael E2
150k12203482
150k12203482
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194320%2fhow-to-find-image-of-a-complex-function-with-given-constraints%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/30687/…
$endgroup$
– Alrubaie
Mar 31 at 16:41
3
$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Draw the image of a complex region
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
Mar 31 at 17:22
1
$begingroup$
Do you want to draw the image or do you want a symbolic-algebraic description of the image?
$endgroup$
– Michael E2
Mar 31 at 18:48
1
$begingroup$
People here generally like users to post code as Mathematica code instead of just images or TeX, so they can copy-paste it. It makes it convenient for them and more likely you will get someone to help you. You may find this meta Q&A helpful
$endgroup$
– Michael E2
Mar 31 at 18:50
$begingroup$
@Michael E2, Great point! I've updated my answer to include the algebraic description as well. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 31 at 19:27