Trjtdtk

The phrase is saying "whether you have a closer connection to a foreign country than you do to the United States". I see no cohesion between whether and than here.

It's not strange. It's correct. Let's make it easier to digest by putting the subordinate clause first:

"Whether (or not) you have a closer connection to a foreign country
than the United States during 2018, this applies to you."

I added "or not" in parentheses because it is meant but is left implied, which is often the case in English and is the case in this sentence. Maybe this is what's throwing you off, like by you mistakenly thinking the "than" is providing the "or" alternative for "whether" that's been omitted, "than" and "or" both being conjunctions.

Here's a simplified version of the sentence:

"Whether or not you have a closer friend than Uncle Sam, this applies."

To be clear, the above sentence doesn't mean the same thing as your sentence. It is merely a similar sentence that doesn't use so many words so it becomes clearer what the structure is and what's being said.

In the sentence (which is quite ordinary, not strange)

whether

is used as a function word to indicate an indirect question involving stated or implied alternatives
(https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/whether).

Than

is not connected with 'whether' but with the comparative form
closer .

Here's an example from Reverso.context.net:

''Paragraph (1) applies whether the requirement referred to therein is in the form of an obligation or whether the law simply provides consequences for the absence of a signature.''

This applies whether you have a closer connection to a foreign country than [to] the United States during 2018, and whether you are a resident under the substantial presence test or green card test.

Unlike the other answerers so far, I would call this sentence ungrammatical.
The word "whether" generally requires an alternative, such as "or not." The second half of the example sentence does provide such an alternative for its "whether," so my only objection to that half is the faulty parallelism. IMO it should have been written grammatically as

... and whether you are a resident under the substantial presence test or under the green card test.

(That is, maybe you're a resident under the substantial presence test, or maybe under the green card test; but it doesn't matter; the rule applies no matter which is the case.)

However, the first half of the example sentence has a "whether" without an "or not." Therefore it's just as ungrammatical as if you wrote a "both" without an "and":

This applies *both if you have a closer connection to a foreign country than to the United States during 2018.

Two grammatical possibilities for this sentence would be:

This applies whether you have a closer connection to a foreign country than to the United States during 2018 or not.

This applies whether or not you have a closer connection to a foreign country than to the United States during 2018.

Since you saw this in an official government publication, I'm sure they meant "whether or not," and it was a simple typo. However, if you had seen this misuse of the word "whether" in a news article online, there would be another highly probable explanation. Many third-party news aggregators recycle content scraped from other sites after running it through a "thesaurus app" to disguise the plagiarism. (For example, see how many news aggregators refer to Macaulay Culkin's role in House Alone.) So, if I saw the word "whether" used like this in an online news story, I would just assume that it had been spewed out by a thesaurus match on the word if.

If and whether are generally synonymous:

She asked if it was raining out.

She asked whether it was raining out.

In this particular sentence, though, the substitution takes us from grammatical (with one meaning) to ungrammatical (where the most natural "fix" has the completely opposite meaning).

This applies [only] if you have a closer connection to a foreign country than to the United States. [It applies in only one case.]

This applies *whether [or not] you have a closer connection to a foreign country than to the United States. [It applies in both cases.]

The sentence in question is perfectly grammatical, but as pointed out in Hot Licks' comment, it is poorly constructed -- almost designed to confuse. It follows the following pattern:

X is applicable whether a comparison is true (you have a closer connection to a foreign country than the United States during 2018).

This said, there's no relation between whether and than.

It's ungrammatical, because "other" has been mistakenly omitted. It should have been "... a closer connection to a foreign country other than the United States". The "whether" has nothing to do with it.

It might not be ungrammatical in a dialect of English other than mine (contemporary Midwestern American), but without the "other", it just doesn't work for me, at all.

The only strange thing is the use of "and" to join the two "whether" clauses, instead of "or".

There is no grammatical connection between "whether" and "than". The overall structure of the sentence is

This applies whether [some condition is true] and whether [some other
condition is true].

IMO it would be more logical to write

This applies whether [some condition is true] or whether [some other
condition is true].

The word "whether" is repeated because the first condition is long and contains several clauses. If the second "whether" was omitted, it is not clear what the "and" refers back to. Compare the original sentence with "... the United States during 2018 and 2019" or "... The United States during 2018 and Europe during 2017" for example.

The first condition is "you have a closer connection to a foreign country than [to] the United States during 2018." The word "than" is linked to "closer," not to "whether".