Could a dragon use its wings to swim? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) The network's official Twitter account is up and running again. What content…Dragon evolving from humanoid: Ice dragonWingless Dragons?Dragon taxonomyCan a dragon be electrocuted?Could this Very Specific Dragon Fly?Can a dragon who can heat parts of its body at will use that to fly?Alternate uses for dragon wings?Anti-Dragon armor, shields and melee weaponsHow would winged humans fight dragons?Is this humanoid dragon realistic the way I’ve imagined it?
What computer would be fastest for Mathematica Home Edition?
Who can trigger ship-wide alerts in Star Trek?
When communicating altitude with a '9' in it, should it be pronounced "nine hundred" or "niner hundred"?
Can a zero nonce be safely used with AES-GCM if the key is random and never used again?
Cold is to Refrigerator as warm is to?
Working around an AWS network ACL rule limit
What is the largest species of polychaete?
Choo-choo! Word trains
What is the order of Mitzvot in Rambam's Sefer Hamitzvot?
Do working physicists consider Newtonian mechanics to be "falsified"?
Replacing HDD with SSD; what about non-APFS/APFS?
Stop battery usage [Ubuntu 18]
Is 1 ppb equal to 1 μg/kg?
Stars Make Stars
Is above average number of years spent on PhD considered a red flag in future academia or industry positions?
Can the prologue be the backstory of your main character?
Need a suitable toxic chemical for a murder plot in my novel
Why use gamma over alpha radiation?
Can I throw a longsword at someone?
Complexity of many constant time steps with occasional logarithmic steps
Why don't the Weasley twins use magic outside of school if the Trace can only find the location of spells cast?
How can I make names more distinctive without making them longer?
How can you insert a "times/divide" symbol similar to the "plus/minus" (±) one?
If A makes B more likely then B makes A more likely"
Could a dragon use its wings to swim?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
The network's official Twitter account is up and running again. What content…Dragon evolving from humanoid: Ice dragonWingless Dragons?Dragon taxonomyCan a dragon be electrocuted?Could this Very Specific Dragon Fly?Can a dragon who can heat parts of its body at will use that to fly?Alternate uses for dragon wings?Anti-Dragon armor, shields and melee weaponsHow would winged humans fight dragons?Is this humanoid dragon realistic the way I’ve imagined it?
$begingroup$
I have three types of dragons; dragons that primarily fly, dragons that primarily run, and dragons that primarily swim, with all three types being able to do the other two things for a limited amount of time.
What kind of wings would a water dragon have to have to be able to fly as well as swim? I had envisioned them using their wings as flippers, but I don't know if that would work for flying too.
biology mythical-creatures dragons
$endgroup$
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
I have three types of dragons; dragons that primarily fly, dragons that primarily run, and dragons that primarily swim, with all three types being able to do the other two things for a limited amount of time.
What kind of wings would a water dragon have to have to be able to fly as well as swim? I had envisioned them using their wings as flippers, but I don't know if that would work for flying too.
biology mythical-creatures dragons
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
I don't know much about the physics or biology of this kind of thing, but it seems to me the needed motion for swimming vs flying is different? You push "down" against the air when flying, as opposed to pushing "back" against the water when swimming? So, anyone please correct me if I'm wrong but I feel like the range of motion is different for these two things and your dragons would need pretty versatile joints? I'm also now pretty interested in this question, looking forward to seeing what the science-literate folks on here say. P.S. Welcome to Stack Exchange
$endgroup$
– MarielS
Mar 31 at 20:58
$begingroup$
You are not a big fan of How to Train Your Dragon, are you?
$endgroup$
– Peter A. Schneider
Apr 1 at 12:35
4
$begingroup$
Considering dragons shouldn't even be able to fly I don't see why swimming would be a problem. The Guards! Guards! book from Terry Pratchett goes into great detail about how and why dragons are completely unrealistic and can't exist (while of course having a fully functional dragon in that story anyway). Unless you're talking of pretty small dragons ;)
$endgroup$
– Mark
Apr 1 at 13:04
1
$begingroup$
@Mark the discworld swamp dragons also suggest an alternative way that an aquatic species might be able to fly, by imitating a submarine-launched missile...
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Apr 1 at 14:57
$begingroup$
Since you don't have a swim speed requirement, my first thought went to sea-flap-flap dragon. Also, for "limited time" do flying fish count as meeting that? X3
$endgroup$
– Tezra
Apr 1 at 16:41
|
show 2 more comments
$begingroup$
I have three types of dragons; dragons that primarily fly, dragons that primarily run, and dragons that primarily swim, with all three types being able to do the other two things for a limited amount of time.
What kind of wings would a water dragon have to have to be able to fly as well as swim? I had envisioned them using their wings as flippers, but I don't know if that would work for flying too.
biology mythical-creatures dragons
$endgroup$
I have three types of dragons; dragons that primarily fly, dragons that primarily run, and dragons that primarily swim, with all three types being able to do the other two things for a limited amount of time.
What kind of wings would a water dragon have to have to be able to fly as well as swim? I had envisioned them using their wings as flippers, but I don't know if that would work for flying too.
biology mythical-creatures dragons
biology mythical-creatures dragons
asked Mar 31 at 20:53
NadiraSpzirglasNadiraSpzirglas
8115
8115
3
$begingroup$
I don't know much about the physics or biology of this kind of thing, but it seems to me the needed motion for swimming vs flying is different? You push "down" against the air when flying, as opposed to pushing "back" against the water when swimming? So, anyone please correct me if I'm wrong but I feel like the range of motion is different for these two things and your dragons would need pretty versatile joints? I'm also now pretty interested in this question, looking forward to seeing what the science-literate folks on here say. P.S. Welcome to Stack Exchange
$endgroup$
– MarielS
Mar 31 at 20:58
$begingroup$
You are not a big fan of How to Train Your Dragon, are you?
$endgroup$
– Peter A. Schneider
Apr 1 at 12:35
4
$begingroup$
Considering dragons shouldn't even be able to fly I don't see why swimming would be a problem. The Guards! Guards! book from Terry Pratchett goes into great detail about how and why dragons are completely unrealistic and can't exist (while of course having a fully functional dragon in that story anyway). Unless you're talking of pretty small dragons ;)
$endgroup$
– Mark
Apr 1 at 13:04
1
$begingroup$
@Mark the discworld swamp dragons also suggest an alternative way that an aquatic species might be able to fly, by imitating a submarine-launched missile...
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Apr 1 at 14:57
$begingroup$
Since you don't have a swim speed requirement, my first thought went to sea-flap-flap dragon. Also, for "limited time" do flying fish count as meeting that? X3
$endgroup$
– Tezra
Apr 1 at 16:41
|
show 2 more comments
3
$begingroup$
I don't know much about the physics or biology of this kind of thing, but it seems to me the needed motion for swimming vs flying is different? You push "down" against the air when flying, as opposed to pushing "back" against the water when swimming? So, anyone please correct me if I'm wrong but I feel like the range of motion is different for these two things and your dragons would need pretty versatile joints? I'm also now pretty interested in this question, looking forward to seeing what the science-literate folks on here say. P.S. Welcome to Stack Exchange
$endgroup$
– MarielS
Mar 31 at 20:58
$begingroup$
You are not a big fan of How to Train Your Dragon, are you?
$endgroup$
– Peter A. Schneider
Apr 1 at 12:35
4
$begingroup$
Considering dragons shouldn't even be able to fly I don't see why swimming would be a problem. The Guards! Guards! book from Terry Pratchett goes into great detail about how and why dragons are completely unrealistic and can't exist (while of course having a fully functional dragon in that story anyway). Unless you're talking of pretty small dragons ;)
$endgroup$
– Mark
Apr 1 at 13:04
1
$begingroup$
@Mark the discworld swamp dragons also suggest an alternative way that an aquatic species might be able to fly, by imitating a submarine-launched missile...
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Apr 1 at 14:57
$begingroup$
Since you don't have a swim speed requirement, my first thought went to sea-flap-flap dragon. Also, for "limited time" do flying fish count as meeting that? X3
$endgroup$
– Tezra
Apr 1 at 16:41
3
3
$begingroup$
I don't know much about the physics or biology of this kind of thing, but it seems to me the needed motion for swimming vs flying is different? You push "down" against the air when flying, as opposed to pushing "back" against the water when swimming? So, anyone please correct me if I'm wrong but I feel like the range of motion is different for these two things and your dragons would need pretty versatile joints? I'm also now pretty interested in this question, looking forward to seeing what the science-literate folks on here say. P.S. Welcome to Stack Exchange
$endgroup$
– MarielS
Mar 31 at 20:58
$begingroup$
I don't know much about the physics or biology of this kind of thing, but it seems to me the needed motion for swimming vs flying is different? You push "down" against the air when flying, as opposed to pushing "back" against the water when swimming? So, anyone please correct me if I'm wrong but I feel like the range of motion is different for these two things and your dragons would need pretty versatile joints? I'm also now pretty interested in this question, looking forward to seeing what the science-literate folks on here say. P.S. Welcome to Stack Exchange
$endgroup$
– MarielS
Mar 31 at 20:58
$begingroup$
You are not a big fan of How to Train Your Dragon, are you?
$endgroup$
– Peter A. Schneider
Apr 1 at 12:35
$begingroup$
You are not a big fan of How to Train Your Dragon, are you?
$endgroup$
– Peter A. Schneider
Apr 1 at 12:35
4
4
$begingroup$
Considering dragons shouldn't even be able to fly I don't see why swimming would be a problem. The Guards! Guards! book from Terry Pratchett goes into great detail about how and why dragons are completely unrealistic and can't exist (while of course having a fully functional dragon in that story anyway). Unless you're talking of pretty small dragons ;)
$endgroup$
– Mark
Apr 1 at 13:04
$begingroup$
Considering dragons shouldn't even be able to fly I don't see why swimming would be a problem. The Guards! Guards! book from Terry Pratchett goes into great detail about how and why dragons are completely unrealistic and can't exist (while of course having a fully functional dragon in that story anyway). Unless you're talking of pretty small dragons ;)
$endgroup$
– Mark
Apr 1 at 13:04
1
1
$begingroup$
@Mark the discworld swamp dragons also suggest an alternative way that an aquatic species might be able to fly, by imitating a submarine-launched missile...
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Apr 1 at 14:57
$begingroup$
@Mark the discworld swamp dragons also suggest an alternative way that an aquatic species might be able to fly, by imitating a submarine-launched missile...
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Apr 1 at 14:57
$begingroup$
Since you don't have a swim speed requirement, my first thought went to sea-flap-flap dragon. Also, for "limited time" do flying fish count as meeting that? X3
$endgroup$
– Tezra
Apr 1 at 16:41
$begingroup$
Since you don't have a swim speed requirement, my first thought went to sea-flap-flap dragon. Also, for "limited time" do flying fish count as meeting that? X3
$endgroup$
– Tezra
Apr 1 at 16:41
|
show 2 more comments
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Totally yes.
If these ducks can do it, your dragons can do it. The video is great - these ducks are flying down to the ocean floor.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7wY4Cnuk-s
It occurs to me that it would be good for something like a dragon to be able to use only part of its wing at first. I worry the forces put over the entirety of the wing to move that much water could tear the wing. As the dragon got up to speed it could use more and more wing.
$endgroup$
7
$begingroup$
The ducks are only using a fraction of their wingspan to swim as the forces and movement are different from flying. The dragons should be fine keeping their wings tucked in the same way.
$endgroup$
– Separatrix
Apr 1 at 11:11
6
$begingroup$
Ducks are perfect "Jack of all trades - master of none" when it comes to locomotion. They can fly, walk, swim and dive, but are not particularlily good at either. But they evolved that way. I am not sure if it can just be transferred to dragons.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
Apr 1 at 15:10
4
$begingroup$
@Phillipp - I like the idea of dragon "jack of all trades". They are big but not the biggest. They are fierce but there are fierce things out there that can take one. They are smart but not the smartest. They cooperate with each other, but usually out of necessity. They can fly, run, swim and dive, and even dig, but not the greatest at any of those things. Maybe the thing they are best at is copying: if a dragon sees another creature doing something, it thinks "I bet I can do that" and it is usually right, to some degree.
$endgroup$
– Willk
Apr 1 at 16:35
5
$begingroup$
@Philipp It's fantasy, so why couldn't it be transferred to dragons? Dragons are already impossible in real life, regardless of whether they can swim.
$endgroup$
– only_pro
Apr 1 at 17:40
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There are certainly real-life birds that can fly in air and primarily hunt underwater by swimming with their wings... puffins. There are other birds that swim underwater primarily by kicking with their feet, such as diving ducks and cormorants, and there are birds that use a mixture of the two strategies, like gannets (which can also do awesome 100kph power dives from 60m up). There's plenty of footage on youtube of all these birds doing what you're interested in, so at this scale what you want is clearly possible (though dragons with huge webbed feet might not be quite so intrinsically bad-ass as ones with talons. ymmv).
I strongly suspect that there will be scaling issues... for the same reason that large flying dragons are awkward things to make plausible (see countless questions on this site passim ad nauseam) making very large flippers remain light and strong and fast enough for flight and remain tough and powerful enough for swimming is likely to be very difficult. If you've already handwaved dragons into your scenario, perhaps this is less of an issue for you. For the record, northern gannets have a 180cm wingspan, so if your dragons are about this sort of size, you'll be just fine.
Now, there are tradeoffs to be made. Penguins clearly outswim all of the above, but they can't fly and so can't really live anywhere with land predators. Puffins can outswim gannets, but both are outflown by piratical birds such as skuas which will attack the them and steal their catch (see kleptoparasitism in birds). Remember that sort of thing if you're making an ecosystem with various dragon species in it. Personally, I feel that flight is often overrated. See also: the astonishing success of your own species, flight-envy notwithstanding, the wide spread of penguins which don't have much use for flying and especially ants which were able to fly once but mostly gave it up and have become extraordinarily successful. When it comes to sea dragons, I can understand that not everyone is excited by the idea of giant marine iguanas that might breathe fire or create pistol-shrimp style shockwaves underwater, though :-(
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
+1 for mentioning gannets - which are impressive as hell up close when you're rowing a dinghy and they smack into the water right next to you...
$endgroup$
– GerardFalla
Apr 1 at 19:38
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Absolutely, but there are some interesting physiological tradeoffs.
Many birds also swim underwater, and there are broadly two techniques for doing so.
Swimming with feet
The first is to use your feet for paddling. Birds such as grebes, loons and cormorants do this, and it can be very effective. It's beneficial as it allows their wings to be well adapted to flight while still being capably of swimming underwater. It also allows for a lot of manoeuvrability.
The first tradeoff is that it's not quite as efficient as using wings so you rarely find it as a sole strategy among sea birds. It's more common among freshwater birds.
The second tradeoff is that to make it more efficient for diving, you tend to need legs that are further and further back on your body. This makes it more and more awkward to walk on land (which is necessary at least for laying eggs). You can see this quite starkly in the extinct Hesperornis which was a sea-going bird that swam with its legs and was probably very ungainly on land.
Swimming by generating lift with wings
The second option is to swim using exactly the same mechanics as flight. Flapping wings produce lift and thrust in exactly the same way whether they're operating in air or water. This can be very efficient, and is how the majority of sea-going diving birds swim. However, there are some key differences.
As air isn't very dense, to fly you want a wing that has quite a lot of surface area compared to the weight/area you're trying to move. Strength-wise, you can get away with this as the wing loadings aren't very high.
Water, however, is much denser. For a given power-stroke, you will generate much more lift and thrust, and your wings will be under much higher strain. So, what you want for swimming is short, stubby but strongly built wings.
What you get in diving birds is very often a compromise. Either they will have wings that are pretty well adapted for flying and their swimming ability suffers (shearwaters for instance), or they are very good at swimming but are not very efficient flyers (Puffins). Some pics to illustrate:
Puffins actually have some of the highest flight costs of any birds. Go far enough this way any you'll lose the ability to fly at all and become extremely efficient swimmers, like penguins.
Some further considerations
One of the other key issues with flight vs swimming is weight. In order to fly efficiently, you want to be as light as possible. In order to swim efficiently, you want to be as close to the density of water as possible. This is a big hurdle for any animal that wants to do both.
Birds specifically have lungs that don't really inflate or deflate like ours do, so they are trying to dive with inflated air sacs inside them. Seabirds have some of the densest bones in the bird family, which helps counteract this buoyancy. Some also swallow stones for ballast.
Feathers are also designed to trap air pockets inside them to increase their surface area for a given weight which is not what you want for diving. Diving birds with waterproof feathers often preen them before diving in order to drive out any trapped air, and some like cormorants don't have waterproof feathers which allows them to get waterlogged while diving and decrease their buoyancy (at the cost of having to dry them out in the sun before they can fly again).
tl;dr All of this adds up to a set of tradeoffs where if you want to be a better swimmer, you will have to make sacrifices in efficiency for flying and/or walking.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Water is about 3 orders of magnitude denser than air.
This means that, for a given profile and velocity, lift forces and drag will be as much as higher in water than in air.
If you need to have lift in air you need a large surface, which would be too large in water. See penguins: their small wings work like a charm in water, but are totally useless to fly.
Unless your dragon has a foldable membrane that can be deployed only in air, there is no way that water optimized find/wings can provide lift in air.
This also answer your question: the water dragons can deploy an additional membrane to get lift when they venture in the air, an they keep the membrane unused when in water, to reduce drag.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Every dragon (and bird) already has a way to retract their "membrane", because they tuck their wing in on an upwards flap and extend it on a downwards flap when they are flying. The difference in surface area (and thus force exerted) is how they are able to gain altitude. The exact same principle applies underwater. This is used by humans (e.g. breaststroke: wide when pulling your arms back, narrow when pushing your ars forward) and birds who swim underwater (as per the other answers).
$endgroup$
– Flater
Apr 1 at 12:45
$begingroup$
Wings, arms and legs: folded; uses its elongated body with a protractable membrane vertically on its tail for swimming. Basically an eel with six appendages. Six of which only cause drag underwater, and four while in flight. And 2~4 required only for walking on land.
$endgroup$
– Mazura
Apr 1 at 23:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If fish can have fins that allow for flight, so can your dragon.
Just don't expect to be able to ride one in flight, or to see it going on for more than a couple hundred meters at a time.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
There are of course other options for primarily aquatic animals who'd like to fly... water jets! blog.nationalgeographic.org/2013/02/20/…
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Apr 1 at 12:17
$begingroup$
Since your answer is built on "flying fish can do it", it is relevant to consider that flying fish glide, they don't fly. They are limited by whatever force they can muster when they jump out of the water, and then they just coast until they land.
$endgroup$
– Flater
Apr 1 at 12:47
1
$begingroup$
@Flater I guess it also depends on the OP's definition of "flying" for the water dragons. If OP just needs short bursts of movement through air without fancy maneuvers or sustained flight, jump-and-glide could very well serve the purpose
$endgroup$
– Delioth
Apr 1 at 14:03
$begingroup$
@Delioth: Keep mind of the square cube law though. Surface area of the wing is a square, but a dragon's mass is a cube. When you scale the flying fish, you will reach a point where the wings won't properly glide anymore even though they may have the same relative size to the dragon's body as is the case for the flying fish.
$endgroup$
– Flater
Apr 1 at 14:15
2
$begingroup$
What about steam powered jets, assuming these are fire-breathing dragons? Ingest water, add fire, expel as steam for initial propulsion
$endgroup$
– Mick O'Hea
Apr 1 at 15:08
|
show 1 more comment
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142896%2fcould-a-dragon-use-its-wings-to-swim%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Totally yes.
If these ducks can do it, your dragons can do it. The video is great - these ducks are flying down to the ocean floor.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7wY4Cnuk-s
It occurs to me that it would be good for something like a dragon to be able to use only part of its wing at first. I worry the forces put over the entirety of the wing to move that much water could tear the wing. As the dragon got up to speed it could use more and more wing.
$endgroup$
7
$begingroup$
The ducks are only using a fraction of their wingspan to swim as the forces and movement are different from flying. The dragons should be fine keeping their wings tucked in the same way.
$endgroup$
– Separatrix
Apr 1 at 11:11
6
$begingroup$
Ducks are perfect "Jack of all trades - master of none" when it comes to locomotion. They can fly, walk, swim and dive, but are not particularlily good at either. But they evolved that way. I am not sure if it can just be transferred to dragons.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
Apr 1 at 15:10
4
$begingroup$
@Phillipp - I like the idea of dragon "jack of all trades". They are big but not the biggest. They are fierce but there are fierce things out there that can take one. They are smart but not the smartest. They cooperate with each other, but usually out of necessity. They can fly, run, swim and dive, and even dig, but not the greatest at any of those things. Maybe the thing they are best at is copying: if a dragon sees another creature doing something, it thinks "I bet I can do that" and it is usually right, to some degree.
$endgroup$
– Willk
Apr 1 at 16:35
5
$begingroup$
@Philipp It's fantasy, so why couldn't it be transferred to dragons? Dragons are already impossible in real life, regardless of whether they can swim.
$endgroup$
– only_pro
Apr 1 at 17:40
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Totally yes.
If these ducks can do it, your dragons can do it. The video is great - these ducks are flying down to the ocean floor.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7wY4Cnuk-s
It occurs to me that it would be good for something like a dragon to be able to use only part of its wing at first. I worry the forces put over the entirety of the wing to move that much water could tear the wing. As the dragon got up to speed it could use more and more wing.
$endgroup$
7
$begingroup$
The ducks are only using a fraction of their wingspan to swim as the forces and movement are different from flying. The dragons should be fine keeping their wings tucked in the same way.
$endgroup$
– Separatrix
Apr 1 at 11:11
6
$begingroup$
Ducks are perfect "Jack of all trades - master of none" when it comes to locomotion. They can fly, walk, swim and dive, but are not particularlily good at either. But they evolved that way. I am not sure if it can just be transferred to dragons.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
Apr 1 at 15:10
4
$begingroup$
@Phillipp - I like the idea of dragon "jack of all trades". They are big but not the biggest. They are fierce but there are fierce things out there that can take one. They are smart but not the smartest. They cooperate with each other, but usually out of necessity. They can fly, run, swim and dive, and even dig, but not the greatest at any of those things. Maybe the thing they are best at is copying: if a dragon sees another creature doing something, it thinks "I bet I can do that" and it is usually right, to some degree.
$endgroup$
– Willk
Apr 1 at 16:35
5
$begingroup$
@Philipp It's fantasy, so why couldn't it be transferred to dragons? Dragons are already impossible in real life, regardless of whether they can swim.
$endgroup$
– only_pro
Apr 1 at 17:40
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Totally yes.
If these ducks can do it, your dragons can do it. The video is great - these ducks are flying down to the ocean floor.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7wY4Cnuk-s
It occurs to me that it would be good for something like a dragon to be able to use only part of its wing at first. I worry the forces put over the entirety of the wing to move that much water could tear the wing. As the dragon got up to speed it could use more and more wing.
$endgroup$
Totally yes.
If these ducks can do it, your dragons can do it. The video is great - these ducks are flying down to the ocean floor.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7wY4Cnuk-s
It occurs to me that it would be good for something like a dragon to be able to use only part of its wing at first. I worry the forces put over the entirety of the wing to move that much water could tear the wing. As the dragon got up to speed it could use more and more wing.
answered Mar 31 at 21:05
WillkWillk
117k28221490
117k28221490
7
$begingroup$
The ducks are only using a fraction of their wingspan to swim as the forces and movement are different from flying. The dragons should be fine keeping their wings tucked in the same way.
$endgroup$
– Separatrix
Apr 1 at 11:11
6
$begingroup$
Ducks are perfect "Jack of all trades - master of none" when it comes to locomotion. They can fly, walk, swim and dive, but are not particularlily good at either. But they evolved that way. I am not sure if it can just be transferred to dragons.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
Apr 1 at 15:10
4
$begingroup$
@Phillipp - I like the idea of dragon "jack of all trades". They are big but not the biggest. They are fierce but there are fierce things out there that can take one. They are smart but not the smartest. They cooperate with each other, but usually out of necessity. They can fly, run, swim and dive, and even dig, but not the greatest at any of those things. Maybe the thing they are best at is copying: if a dragon sees another creature doing something, it thinks "I bet I can do that" and it is usually right, to some degree.
$endgroup$
– Willk
Apr 1 at 16:35
5
$begingroup$
@Philipp It's fantasy, so why couldn't it be transferred to dragons? Dragons are already impossible in real life, regardless of whether they can swim.
$endgroup$
– only_pro
Apr 1 at 17:40
add a comment |
7
$begingroup$
The ducks are only using a fraction of their wingspan to swim as the forces and movement are different from flying. The dragons should be fine keeping their wings tucked in the same way.
$endgroup$
– Separatrix
Apr 1 at 11:11
6
$begingroup$
Ducks are perfect "Jack of all trades - master of none" when it comes to locomotion. They can fly, walk, swim and dive, but are not particularlily good at either. But they evolved that way. I am not sure if it can just be transferred to dragons.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
Apr 1 at 15:10
4
$begingroup$
@Phillipp - I like the idea of dragon "jack of all trades". They are big but not the biggest. They are fierce but there are fierce things out there that can take one. They are smart but not the smartest. They cooperate with each other, but usually out of necessity. They can fly, run, swim and dive, and even dig, but not the greatest at any of those things. Maybe the thing they are best at is copying: if a dragon sees another creature doing something, it thinks "I bet I can do that" and it is usually right, to some degree.
$endgroup$
– Willk
Apr 1 at 16:35
5
$begingroup$
@Philipp It's fantasy, so why couldn't it be transferred to dragons? Dragons are already impossible in real life, regardless of whether they can swim.
$endgroup$
– only_pro
Apr 1 at 17:40
7
7
$begingroup$
The ducks are only using a fraction of their wingspan to swim as the forces and movement are different from flying. The dragons should be fine keeping their wings tucked in the same way.
$endgroup$
– Separatrix
Apr 1 at 11:11
$begingroup$
The ducks are only using a fraction of their wingspan to swim as the forces and movement are different from flying. The dragons should be fine keeping their wings tucked in the same way.
$endgroup$
– Separatrix
Apr 1 at 11:11
6
6
$begingroup$
Ducks are perfect "Jack of all trades - master of none" when it comes to locomotion. They can fly, walk, swim and dive, but are not particularlily good at either. But they evolved that way. I am not sure if it can just be transferred to dragons.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
Apr 1 at 15:10
$begingroup$
Ducks are perfect "Jack of all trades - master of none" when it comes to locomotion. They can fly, walk, swim and dive, but are not particularlily good at either. But they evolved that way. I am not sure if it can just be transferred to dragons.
$endgroup$
– Philipp
Apr 1 at 15:10
4
4
$begingroup$
@Phillipp - I like the idea of dragon "jack of all trades". They are big but not the biggest. They are fierce but there are fierce things out there that can take one. They are smart but not the smartest. They cooperate with each other, but usually out of necessity. They can fly, run, swim and dive, and even dig, but not the greatest at any of those things. Maybe the thing they are best at is copying: if a dragon sees another creature doing something, it thinks "I bet I can do that" and it is usually right, to some degree.
$endgroup$
– Willk
Apr 1 at 16:35
$begingroup$
@Phillipp - I like the idea of dragon "jack of all trades". They are big but not the biggest. They are fierce but there are fierce things out there that can take one. They are smart but not the smartest. They cooperate with each other, but usually out of necessity. They can fly, run, swim and dive, and even dig, but not the greatest at any of those things. Maybe the thing they are best at is copying: if a dragon sees another creature doing something, it thinks "I bet I can do that" and it is usually right, to some degree.
$endgroup$
– Willk
Apr 1 at 16:35
5
5
$begingroup$
@Philipp It's fantasy, so why couldn't it be transferred to dragons? Dragons are already impossible in real life, regardless of whether they can swim.
$endgroup$
– only_pro
Apr 1 at 17:40
$begingroup$
@Philipp It's fantasy, so why couldn't it be transferred to dragons? Dragons are already impossible in real life, regardless of whether they can swim.
$endgroup$
– only_pro
Apr 1 at 17:40
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There are certainly real-life birds that can fly in air and primarily hunt underwater by swimming with their wings... puffins. There are other birds that swim underwater primarily by kicking with their feet, such as diving ducks and cormorants, and there are birds that use a mixture of the two strategies, like gannets (which can also do awesome 100kph power dives from 60m up). There's plenty of footage on youtube of all these birds doing what you're interested in, so at this scale what you want is clearly possible (though dragons with huge webbed feet might not be quite so intrinsically bad-ass as ones with talons. ymmv).
I strongly suspect that there will be scaling issues... for the same reason that large flying dragons are awkward things to make plausible (see countless questions on this site passim ad nauseam) making very large flippers remain light and strong and fast enough for flight and remain tough and powerful enough for swimming is likely to be very difficult. If you've already handwaved dragons into your scenario, perhaps this is less of an issue for you. For the record, northern gannets have a 180cm wingspan, so if your dragons are about this sort of size, you'll be just fine.
Now, there are tradeoffs to be made. Penguins clearly outswim all of the above, but they can't fly and so can't really live anywhere with land predators. Puffins can outswim gannets, but both are outflown by piratical birds such as skuas which will attack the them and steal their catch (see kleptoparasitism in birds). Remember that sort of thing if you're making an ecosystem with various dragon species in it. Personally, I feel that flight is often overrated. See also: the astonishing success of your own species, flight-envy notwithstanding, the wide spread of penguins which don't have much use for flying and especially ants which were able to fly once but mostly gave it up and have become extraordinarily successful. When it comes to sea dragons, I can understand that not everyone is excited by the idea of giant marine iguanas that might breathe fire or create pistol-shrimp style shockwaves underwater, though :-(
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
+1 for mentioning gannets - which are impressive as hell up close when you're rowing a dinghy and they smack into the water right next to you...
$endgroup$
– GerardFalla
Apr 1 at 19:38
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There are certainly real-life birds that can fly in air and primarily hunt underwater by swimming with their wings... puffins. There are other birds that swim underwater primarily by kicking with their feet, such as diving ducks and cormorants, and there are birds that use a mixture of the two strategies, like gannets (which can also do awesome 100kph power dives from 60m up). There's plenty of footage on youtube of all these birds doing what you're interested in, so at this scale what you want is clearly possible (though dragons with huge webbed feet might not be quite so intrinsically bad-ass as ones with talons. ymmv).
I strongly suspect that there will be scaling issues... for the same reason that large flying dragons are awkward things to make plausible (see countless questions on this site passim ad nauseam) making very large flippers remain light and strong and fast enough for flight and remain tough and powerful enough for swimming is likely to be very difficult. If you've already handwaved dragons into your scenario, perhaps this is less of an issue for you. For the record, northern gannets have a 180cm wingspan, so if your dragons are about this sort of size, you'll be just fine.
Now, there are tradeoffs to be made. Penguins clearly outswim all of the above, but they can't fly and so can't really live anywhere with land predators. Puffins can outswim gannets, but both are outflown by piratical birds such as skuas which will attack the them and steal their catch (see kleptoparasitism in birds). Remember that sort of thing if you're making an ecosystem with various dragon species in it. Personally, I feel that flight is often overrated. See also: the astonishing success of your own species, flight-envy notwithstanding, the wide spread of penguins which don't have much use for flying and especially ants which were able to fly once but mostly gave it up and have become extraordinarily successful. When it comes to sea dragons, I can understand that not everyone is excited by the idea of giant marine iguanas that might breathe fire or create pistol-shrimp style shockwaves underwater, though :-(
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
+1 for mentioning gannets - which are impressive as hell up close when you're rowing a dinghy and they smack into the water right next to you...
$endgroup$
– GerardFalla
Apr 1 at 19:38
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There are certainly real-life birds that can fly in air and primarily hunt underwater by swimming with their wings... puffins. There are other birds that swim underwater primarily by kicking with their feet, such as diving ducks and cormorants, and there are birds that use a mixture of the two strategies, like gannets (which can also do awesome 100kph power dives from 60m up). There's plenty of footage on youtube of all these birds doing what you're interested in, so at this scale what you want is clearly possible (though dragons with huge webbed feet might not be quite so intrinsically bad-ass as ones with talons. ymmv).
I strongly suspect that there will be scaling issues... for the same reason that large flying dragons are awkward things to make plausible (see countless questions on this site passim ad nauseam) making very large flippers remain light and strong and fast enough for flight and remain tough and powerful enough for swimming is likely to be very difficult. If you've already handwaved dragons into your scenario, perhaps this is less of an issue for you. For the record, northern gannets have a 180cm wingspan, so if your dragons are about this sort of size, you'll be just fine.
Now, there are tradeoffs to be made. Penguins clearly outswim all of the above, but they can't fly and so can't really live anywhere with land predators. Puffins can outswim gannets, but both are outflown by piratical birds such as skuas which will attack the them and steal their catch (see kleptoparasitism in birds). Remember that sort of thing if you're making an ecosystem with various dragon species in it. Personally, I feel that flight is often overrated. See also: the astonishing success of your own species, flight-envy notwithstanding, the wide spread of penguins which don't have much use for flying and especially ants which were able to fly once but mostly gave it up and have become extraordinarily successful. When it comes to sea dragons, I can understand that not everyone is excited by the idea of giant marine iguanas that might breathe fire or create pistol-shrimp style shockwaves underwater, though :-(
$endgroup$
There are certainly real-life birds that can fly in air and primarily hunt underwater by swimming with their wings... puffins. There are other birds that swim underwater primarily by kicking with their feet, such as diving ducks and cormorants, and there are birds that use a mixture of the two strategies, like gannets (which can also do awesome 100kph power dives from 60m up). There's plenty of footage on youtube of all these birds doing what you're interested in, so at this scale what you want is clearly possible (though dragons with huge webbed feet might not be quite so intrinsically bad-ass as ones with talons. ymmv).
I strongly suspect that there will be scaling issues... for the same reason that large flying dragons are awkward things to make plausible (see countless questions on this site passim ad nauseam) making very large flippers remain light and strong and fast enough for flight and remain tough and powerful enough for swimming is likely to be very difficult. If you've already handwaved dragons into your scenario, perhaps this is less of an issue for you. For the record, northern gannets have a 180cm wingspan, so if your dragons are about this sort of size, you'll be just fine.
Now, there are tradeoffs to be made. Penguins clearly outswim all of the above, but they can't fly and so can't really live anywhere with land predators. Puffins can outswim gannets, but both are outflown by piratical birds such as skuas which will attack the them and steal their catch (see kleptoparasitism in birds). Remember that sort of thing if you're making an ecosystem with various dragon species in it. Personally, I feel that flight is often overrated. See also: the astonishing success of your own species, flight-envy notwithstanding, the wide spread of penguins which don't have much use for flying and especially ants which were able to fly once but mostly gave it up and have become extraordinarily successful. When it comes to sea dragons, I can understand that not everyone is excited by the idea of giant marine iguanas that might breathe fire or create pistol-shrimp style shockwaves underwater, though :-(
edited Apr 1 at 19:48
answered Mar 31 at 21:13
Starfish PrimeStarfish Prime
1,341214
1,341214
2
$begingroup$
+1 for mentioning gannets - which are impressive as hell up close when you're rowing a dinghy and they smack into the water right next to you...
$endgroup$
– GerardFalla
Apr 1 at 19:38
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
+1 for mentioning gannets - which are impressive as hell up close when you're rowing a dinghy and they smack into the water right next to you...
$endgroup$
– GerardFalla
Apr 1 at 19:38
2
2
$begingroup$
+1 for mentioning gannets - which are impressive as hell up close when you're rowing a dinghy and they smack into the water right next to you...
$endgroup$
– GerardFalla
Apr 1 at 19:38
$begingroup$
+1 for mentioning gannets - which are impressive as hell up close when you're rowing a dinghy and they smack into the water right next to you...
$endgroup$
– GerardFalla
Apr 1 at 19:38
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Absolutely, but there are some interesting physiological tradeoffs.
Many birds also swim underwater, and there are broadly two techniques for doing so.
Swimming with feet
The first is to use your feet for paddling. Birds such as grebes, loons and cormorants do this, and it can be very effective. It's beneficial as it allows their wings to be well adapted to flight while still being capably of swimming underwater. It also allows for a lot of manoeuvrability.
The first tradeoff is that it's not quite as efficient as using wings so you rarely find it as a sole strategy among sea birds. It's more common among freshwater birds.
The second tradeoff is that to make it more efficient for diving, you tend to need legs that are further and further back on your body. This makes it more and more awkward to walk on land (which is necessary at least for laying eggs). You can see this quite starkly in the extinct Hesperornis which was a sea-going bird that swam with its legs and was probably very ungainly on land.
Swimming by generating lift with wings
The second option is to swim using exactly the same mechanics as flight. Flapping wings produce lift and thrust in exactly the same way whether they're operating in air or water. This can be very efficient, and is how the majority of sea-going diving birds swim. However, there are some key differences.
As air isn't very dense, to fly you want a wing that has quite a lot of surface area compared to the weight/area you're trying to move. Strength-wise, you can get away with this as the wing loadings aren't very high.
Water, however, is much denser. For a given power-stroke, you will generate much more lift and thrust, and your wings will be under much higher strain. So, what you want for swimming is short, stubby but strongly built wings.
What you get in diving birds is very often a compromise. Either they will have wings that are pretty well adapted for flying and their swimming ability suffers (shearwaters for instance), or they are very good at swimming but are not very efficient flyers (Puffins). Some pics to illustrate:
Puffins actually have some of the highest flight costs of any birds. Go far enough this way any you'll lose the ability to fly at all and become extremely efficient swimmers, like penguins.
Some further considerations
One of the other key issues with flight vs swimming is weight. In order to fly efficiently, you want to be as light as possible. In order to swim efficiently, you want to be as close to the density of water as possible. This is a big hurdle for any animal that wants to do both.
Birds specifically have lungs that don't really inflate or deflate like ours do, so they are trying to dive with inflated air sacs inside them. Seabirds have some of the densest bones in the bird family, which helps counteract this buoyancy. Some also swallow stones for ballast.
Feathers are also designed to trap air pockets inside them to increase their surface area for a given weight which is not what you want for diving. Diving birds with waterproof feathers often preen them before diving in order to drive out any trapped air, and some like cormorants don't have waterproof feathers which allows them to get waterlogged while diving and decrease their buoyancy (at the cost of having to dry them out in the sun before they can fly again).
tl;dr All of this adds up to a set of tradeoffs where if you want to be a better swimmer, you will have to make sacrifices in efficiency for flying and/or walking.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Absolutely, but there are some interesting physiological tradeoffs.
Many birds also swim underwater, and there are broadly two techniques for doing so.
Swimming with feet
The first is to use your feet for paddling. Birds such as grebes, loons and cormorants do this, and it can be very effective. It's beneficial as it allows their wings to be well adapted to flight while still being capably of swimming underwater. It also allows for a lot of manoeuvrability.
The first tradeoff is that it's not quite as efficient as using wings so you rarely find it as a sole strategy among sea birds. It's more common among freshwater birds.
The second tradeoff is that to make it more efficient for diving, you tend to need legs that are further and further back on your body. This makes it more and more awkward to walk on land (which is necessary at least for laying eggs). You can see this quite starkly in the extinct Hesperornis which was a sea-going bird that swam with its legs and was probably very ungainly on land.
Swimming by generating lift with wings
The second option is to swim using exactly the same mechanics as flight. Flapping wings produce lift and thrust in exactly the same way whether they're operating in air or water. This can be very efficient, and is how the majority of sea-going diving birds swim. However, there are some key differences.
As air isn't very dense, to fly you want a wing that has quite a lot of surface area compared to the weight/area you're trying to move. Strength-wise, you can get away with this as the wing loadings aren't very high.
Water, however, is much denser. For a given power-stroke, you will generate much more lift and thrust, and your wings will be under much higher strain. So, what you want for swimming is short, stubby but strongly built wings.
What you get in diving birds is very often a compromise. Either they will have wings that are pretty well adapted for flying and their swimming ability suffers (shearwaters for instance), or they are very good at swimming but are not very efficient flyers (Puffins). Some pics to illustrate:
Puffins actually have some of the highest flight costs of any birds. Go far enough this way any you'll lose the ability to fly at all and become extremely efficient swimmers, like penguins.
Some further considerations
One of the other key issues with flight vs swimming is weight. In order to fly efficiently, you want to be as light as possible. In order to swim efficiently, you want to be as close to the density of water as possible. This is a big hurdle for any animal that wants to do both.
Birds specifically have lungs that don't really inflate or deflate like ours do, so they are trying to dive with inflated air sacs inside them. Seabirds have some of the densest bones in the bird family, which helps counteract this buoyancy. Some also swallow stones for ballast.
Feathers are also designed to trap air pockets inside them to increase their surface area for a given weight which is not what you want for diving. Diving birds with waterproof feathers often preen them before diving in order to drive out any trapped air, and some like cormorants don't have waterproof feathers which allows them to get waterlogged while diving and decrease their buoyancy (at the cost of having to dry them out in the sun before they can fly again).
tl;dr All of this adds up to a set of tradeoffs where if you want to be a better swimmer, you will have to make sacrifices in efficiency for flying and/or walking.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Absolutely, but there are some interesting physiological tradeoffs.
Many birds also swim underwater, and there are broadly two techniques for doing so.
Swimming with feet
The first is to use your feet for paddling. Birds such as grebes, loons and cormorants do this, and it can be very effective. It's beneficial as it allows their wings to be well adapted to flight while still being capably of swimming underwater. It also allows for a lot of manoeuvrability.
The first tradeoff is that it's not quite as efficient as using wings so you rarely find it as a sole strategy among sea birds. It's more common among freshwater birds.
The second tradeoff is that to make it more efficient for diving, you tend to need legs that are further and further back on your body. This makes it more and more awkward to walk on land (which is necessary at least for laying eggs). You can see this quite starkly in the extinct Hesperornis which was a sea-going bird that swam with its legs and was probably very ungainly on land.
Swimming by generating lift with wings
The second option is to swim using exactly the same mechanics as flight. Flapping wings produce lift and thrust in exactly the same way whether they're operating in air or water. This can be very efficient, and is how the majority of sea-going diving birds swim. However, there are some key differences.
As air isn't very dense, to fly you want a wing that has quite a lot of surface area compared to the weight/area you're trying to move. Strength-wise, you can get away with this as the wing loadings aren't very high.
Water, however, is much denser. For a given power-stroke, you will generate much more lift and thrust, and your wings will be under much higher strain. So, what you want for swimming is short, stubby but strongly built wings.
What you get in diving birds is very often a compromise. Either they will have wings that are pretty well adapted for flying and their swimming ability suffers (shearwaters for instance), or they are very good at swimming but are not very efficient flyers (Puffins). Some pics to illustrate:
Puffins actually have some of the highest flight costs of any birds. Go far enough this way any you'll lose the ability to fly at all and become extremely efficient swimmers, like penguins.
Some further considerations
One of the other key issues with flight vs swimming is weight. In order to fly efficiently, you want to be as light as possible. In order to swim efficiently, you want to be as close to the density of water as possible. This is a big hurdle for any animal that wants to do both.
Birds specifically have lungs that don't really inflate or deflate like ours do, so they are trying to dive with inflated air sacs inside them. Seabirds have some of the densest bones in the bird family, which helps counteract this buoyancy. Some also swallow stones for ballast.
Feathers are also designed to trap air pockets inside them to increase their surface area for a given weight which is not what you want for diving. Diving birds with waterproof feathers often preen them before diving in order to drive out any trapped air, and some like cormorants don't have waterproof feathers which allows them to get waterlogged while diving and decrease their buoyancy (at the cost of having to dry them out in the sun before they can fly again).
tl;dr All of this adds up to a set of tradeoffs where if you want to be a better swimmer, you will have to make sacrifices in efficiency for flying and/or walking.
$endgroup$
Absolutely, but there are some interesting physiological tradeoffs.
Many birds also swim underwater, and there are broadly two techniques for doing so.
Swimming with feet
The first is to use your feet for paddling. Birds such as grebes, loons and cormorants do this, and it can be very effective. It's beneficial as it allows their wings to be well adapted to flight while still being capably of swimming underwater. It also allows for a lot of manoeuvrability.
The first tradeoff is that it's not quite as efficient as using wings so you rarely find it as a sole strategy among sea birds. It's more common among freshwater birds.
The second tradeoff is that to make it more efficient for diving, you tend to need legs that are further and further back on your body. This makes it more and more awkward to walk on land (which is necessary at least for laying eggs). You can see this quite starkly in the extinct Hesperornis which was a sea-going bird that swam with its legs and was probably very ungainly on land.
Swimming by generating lift with wings
The second option is to swim using exactly the same mechanics as flight. Flapping wings produce lift and thrust in exactly the same way whether they're operating in air or water. This can be very efficient, and is how the majority of sea-going diving birds swim. However, there are some key differences.
As air isn't very dense, to fly you want a wing that has quite a lot of surface area compared to the weight/area you're trying to move. Strength-wise, you can get away with this as the wing loadings aren't very high.
Water, however, is much denser. For a given power-stroke, you will generate much more lift and thrust, and your wings will be under much higher strain. So, what you want for swimming is short, stubby but strongly built wings.
What you get in diving birds is very often a compromise. Either they will have wings that are pretty well adapted for flying and their swimming ability suffers (shearwaters for instance), or they are very good at swimming but are not very efficient flyers (Puffins). Some pics to illustrate:
Puffins actually have some of the highest flight costs of any birds. Go far enough this way any you'll lose the ability to fly at all and become extremely efficient swimmers, like penguins.
Some further considerations
One of the other key issues with flight vs swimming is weight. In order to fly efficiently, you want to be as light as possible. In order to swim efficiently, you want to be as close to the density of water as possible. This is a big hurdle for any animal that wants to do both.
Birds specifically have lungs that don't really inflate or deflate like ours do, so they are trying to dive with inflated air sacs inside them. Seabirds have some of the densest bones in the bird family, which helps counteract this buoyancy. Some also swallow stones for ballast.
Feathers are also designed to trap air pockets inside them to increase their surface area for a given weight which is not what you want for diving. Diving birds with waterproof feathers often preen them before diving in order to drive out any trapped air, and some like cormorants don't have waterproof feathers which allows them to get waterlogged while diving and decrease their buoyancy (at the cost of having to dry them out in the sun before they can fly again).
tl;dr All of this adds up to a set of tradeoffs where if you want to be a better swimmer, you will have to make sacrifices in efficiency for flying and/or walking.
answered Apr 1 at 11:35
YnneadwraithYnneadwraith
5,86111730
5,86111730
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Water is about 3 orders of magnitude denser than air.
This means that, for a given profile and velocity, lift forces and drag will be as much as higher in water than in air.
If you need to have lift in air you need a large surface, which would be too large in water. See penguins: their small wings work like a charm in water, but are totally useless to fly.
Unless your dragon has a foldable membrane that can be deployed only in air, there is no way that water optimized find/wings can provide lift in air.
This also answer your question: the water dragons can deploy an additional membrane to get lift when they venture in the air, an they keep the membrane unused when in water, to reduce drag.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Every dragon (and bird) already has a way to retract their "membrane", because they tuck their wing in on an upwards flap and extend it on a downwards flap when they are flying. The difference in surface area (and thus force exerted) is how they are able to gain altitude. The exact same principle applies underwater. This is used by humans (e.g. breaststroke: wide when pulling your arms back, narrow when pushing your ars forward) and birds who swim underwater (as per the other answers).
$endgroup$
– Flater
Apr 1 at 12:45
$begingroup$
Wings, arms and legs: folded; uses its elongated body with a protractable membrane vertically on its tail for swimming. Basically an eel with six appendages. Six of which only cause drag underwater, and four while in flight. And 2~4 required only for walking on land.
$endgroup$
– Mazura
Apr 1 at 23:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Water is about 3 orders of magnitude denser than air.
This means that, for a given profile and velocity, lift forces and drag will be as much as higher in water than in air.
If you need to have lift in air you need a large surface, which would be too large in water. See penguins: their small wings work like a charm in water, but are totally useless to fly.
Unless your dragon has a foldable membrane that can be deployed only in air, there is no way that water optimized find/wings can provide lift in air.
This also answer your question: the water dragons can deploy an additional membrane to get lift when they venture in the air, an they keep the membrane unused when in water, to reduce drag.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Every dragon (and bird) already has a way to retract their "membrane", because they tuck their wing in on an upwards flap and extend it on a downwards flap when they are flying. The difference in surface area (and thus force exerted) is how they are able to gain altitude. The exact same principle applies underwater. This is used by humans (e.g. breaststroke: wide when pulling your arms back, narrow when pushing your ars forward) and birds who swim underwater (as per the other answers).
$endgroup$
– Flater
Apr 1 at 12:45
$begingroup$
Wings, arms and legs: folded; uses its elongated body with a protractable membrane vertically on its tail for swimming. Basically an eel with six appendages. Six of which only cause drag underwater, and four while in flight. And 2~4 required only for walking on land.
$endgroup$
– Mazura
Apr 1 at 23:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Water is about 3 orders of magnitude denser than air.
This means that, for a given profile and velocity, lift forces and drag will be as much as higher in water than in air.
If you need to have lift in air you need a large surface, which would be too large in water. See penguins: their small wings work like a charm in water, but are totally useless to fly.
Unless your dragon has a foldable membrane that can be deployed only in air, there is no way that water optimized find/wings can provide lift in air.
This also answer your question: the water dragons can deploy an additional membrane to get lift when they venture in the air, an they keep the membrane unused when in water, to reduce drag.
$endgroup$
Water is about 3 orders of magnitude denser than air.
This means that, for a given profile and velocity, lift forces and drag will be as much as higher in water than in air.
If you need to have lift in air you need a large surface, which would be too large in water. See penguins: their small wings work like a charm in water, but are totally useless to fly.
Unless your dragon has a foldable membrane that can be deployed only in air, there is no way that water optimized find/wings can provide lift in air.
This also answer your question: the water dragons can deploy an additional membrane to get lift when they venture in the air, an they keep the membrane unused when in water, to reduce drag.
answered Apr 1 at 7:01
L.Dutch♦L.Dutch
91.5k29211439
91.5k29211439
2
$begingroup$
Every dragon (and bird) already has a way to retract their "membrane", because they tuck their wing in on an upwards flap and extend it on a downwards flap when they are flying. The difference in surface area (and thus force exerted) is how they are able to gain altitude. The exact same principle applies underwater. This is used by humans (e.g. breaststroke: wide when pulling your arms back, narrow when pushing your ars forward) and birds who swim underwater (as per the other answers).
$endgroup$
– Flater
Apr 1 at 12:45
$begingroup$
Wings, arms and legs: folded; uses its elongated body with a protractable membrane vertically on its tail for swimming. Basically an eel with six appendages. Six of which only cause drag underwater, and four while in flight. And 2~4 required only for walking on land.
$endgroup$
– Mazura
Apr 1 at 23:39
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
Every dragon (and bird) already has a way to retract their "membrane", because they tuck their wing in on an upwards flap and extend it on a downwards flap when they are flying. The difference in surface area (and thus force exerted) is how they are able to gain altitude. The exact same principle applies underwater. This is used by humans (e.g. breaststroke: wide when pulling your arms back, narrow when pushing your ars forward) and birds who swim underwater (as per the other answers).
$endgroup$
– Flater
Apr 1 at 12:45
$begingroup$
Wings, arms and legs: folded; uses its elongated body with a protractable membrane vertically on its tail for swimming. Basically an eel with six appendages. Six of which only cause drag underwater, and four while in flight. And 2~4 required only for walking on land.
$endgroup$
– Mazura
Apr 1 at 23:39
2
2
$begingroup$
Every dragon (and bird) already has a way to retract their "membrane", because they tuck their wing in on an upwards flap and extend it on a downwards flap when they are flying. The difference in surface area (and thus force exerted) is how they are able to gain altitude. The exact same principle applies underwater. This is used by humans (e.g. breaststroke: wide when pulling your arms back, narrow when pushing your ars forward) and birds who swim underwater (as per the other answers).
$endgroup$
– Flater
Apr 1 at 12:45
$begingroup$
Every dragon (and bird) already has a way to retract their "membrane", because they tuck their wing in on an upwards flap and extend it on a downwards flap when they are flying. The difference in surface area (and thus force exerted) is how they are able to gain altitude. The exact same principle applies underwater. This is used by humans (e.g. breaststroke: wide when pulling your arms back, narrow when pushing your ars forward) and birds who swim underwater (as per the other answers).
$endgroup$
– Flater
Apr 1 at 12:45
$begingroup$
Wings, arms and legs: folded; uses its elongated body with a protractable membrane vertically on its tail for swimming. Basically an eel with six appendages. Six of which only cause drag underwater, and four while in flight. And 2~4 required only for walking on land.
$endgroup$
– Mazura
Apr 1 at 23:39
$begingroup$
Wings, arms and legs: folded; uses its elongated body with a protractable membrane vertically on its tail for swimming. Basically an eel with six appendages. Six of which only cause drag underwater, and four while in flight. And 2~4 required only for walking on land.
$endgroup$
– Mazura
Apr 1 at 23:39
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If fish can have fins that allow for flight, so can your dragon.
Just don't expect to be able to ride one in flight, or to see it going on for more than a couple hundred meters at a time.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
There are of course other options for primarily aquatic animals who'd like to fly... water jets! blog.nationalgeographic.org/2013/02/20/…
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Apr 1 at 12:17
$begingroup$
Since your answer is built on "flying fish can do it", it is relevant to consider that flying fish glide, they don't fly. They are limited by whatever force they can muster when they jump out of the water, and then they just coast until they land.
$endgroup$
– Flater
Apr 1 at 12:47
1
$begingroup$
@Flater I guess it also depends on the OP's definition of "flying" for the water dragons. If OP just needs short bursts of movement through air without fancy maneuvers or sustained flight, jump-and-glide could very well serve the purpose
$endgroup$
– Delioth
Apr 1 at 14:03
$begingroup$
@Delioth: Keep mind of the square cube law though. Surface area of the wing is a square, but a dragon's mass is a cube. When you scale the flying fish, you will reach a point where the wings won't properly glide anymore even though they may have the same relative size to the dragon's body as is the case for the flying fish.
$endgroup$
– Flater
Apr 1 at 14:15
2
$begingroup$
What about steam powered jets, assuming these are fire-breathing dragons? Ingest water, add fire, expel as steam for initial propulsion
$endgroup$
– Mick O'Hea
Apr 1 at 15:08
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
If fish can have fins that allow for flight, so can your dragon.
Just don't expect to be able to ride one in flight, or to see it going on for more than a couple hundred meters at a time.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
There are of course other options for primarily aquatic animals who'd like to fly... water jets! blog.nationalgeographic.org/2013/02/20/…
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Apr 1 at 12:17
$begingroup$
Since your answer is built on "flying fish can do it", it is relevant to consider that flying fish glide, they don't fly. They are limited by whatever force they can muster when they jump out of the water, and then they just coast until they land.
$endgroup$
– Flater
Apr 1 at 12:47
1
$begingroup$
@Flater I guess it also depends on the OP's definition of "flying" for the water dragons. If OP just needs short bursts of movement through air without fancy maneuvers or sustained flight, jump-and-glide could very well serve the purpose
$endgroup$
– Delioth
Apr 1 at 14:03
$begingroup$
@Delioth: Keep mind of the square cube law though. Surface area of the wing is a square, but a dragon's mass is a cube. When you scale the flying fish, you will reach a point where the wings won't properly glide anymore even though they may have the same relative size to the dragon's body as is the case for the flying fish.
$endgroup$
– Flater
Apr 1 at 14:15
2
$begingroup$
What about steam powered jets, assuming these are fire-breathing dragons? Ingest water, add fire, expel as steam for initial propulsion
$endgroup$
– Mick O'Hea
Apr 1 at 15:08
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
If fish can have fins that allow for flight, so can your dragon.
Just don't expect to be able to ride one in flight, or to see it going on for more than a couple hundred meters at a time.
$endgroup$
If fish can have fins that allow for flight, so can your dragon.
Just don't expect to be able to ride one in flight, or to see it going on for more than a couple hundred meters at a time.
answered Apr 1 at 10:42
RenanRenan
53k15120265
53k15120265
$begingroup$
There are of course other options for primarily aquatic animals who'd like to fly... water jets! blog.nationalgeographic.org/2013/02/20/…
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Apr 1 at 12:17
$begingroup$
Since your answer is built on "flying fish can do it", it is relevant to consider that flying fish glide, they don't fly. They are limited by whatever force they can muster when they jump out of the water, and then they just coast until they land.
$endgroup$
– Flater
Apr 1 at 12:47
1
$begingroup$
@Flater I guess it also depends on the OP's definition of "flying" for the water dragons. If OP just needs short bursts of movement through air without fancy maneuvers or sustained flight, jump-and-glide could very well serve the purpose
$endgroup$
– Delioth
Apr 1 at 14:03
$begingroup$
@Delioth: Keep mind of the square cube law though. Surface area of the wing is a square, but a dragon's mass is a cube. When you scale the flying fish, you will reach a point where the wings won't properly glide anymore even though they may have the same relative size to the dragon's body as is the case for the flying fish.
$endgroup$
– Flater
Apr 1 at 14:15
2
$begingroup$
What about steam powered jets, assuming these are fire-breathing dragons? Ingest water, add fire, expel as steam for initial propulsion
$endgroup$
– Mick O'Hea
Apr 1 at 15:08
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
There are of course other options for primarily aquatic animals who'd like to fly... water jets! blog.nationalgeographic.org/2013/02/20/…
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Apr 1 at 12:17
$begingroup$
Since your answer is built on "flying fish can do it", it is relevant to consider that flying fish glide, they don't fly. They are limited by whatever force they can muster when they jump out of the water, and then they just coast until they land.
$endgroup$
– Flater
Apr 1 at 12:47
1
$begingroup$
@Flater I guess it also depends on the OP's definition of "flying" for the water dragons. If OP just needs short bursts of movement through air without fancy maneuvers or sustained flight, jump-and-glide could very well serve the purpose
$endgroup$
– Delioth
Apr 1 at 14:03
$begingroup$
@Delioth: Keep mind of the square cube law though. Surface area of the wing is a square, but a dragon's mass is a cube. When you scale the flying fish, you will reach a point where the wings won't properly glide anymore even though they may have the same relative size to the dragon's body as is the case for the flying fish.
$endgroup$
– Flater
Apr 1 at 14:15
2
$begingroup$
What about steam powered jets, assuming these are fire-breathing dragons? Ingest water, add fire, expel as steam for initial propulsion
$endgroup$
– Mick O'Hea
Apr 1 at 15:08
$begingroup$
There are of course other options for primarily aquatic animals who'd like to fly... water jets! blog.nationalgeographic.org/2013/02/20/…
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Apr 1 at 12:17
$begingroup$
There are of course other options for primarily aquatic animals who'd like to fly... water jets! blog.nationalgeographic.org/2013/02/20/…
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Apr 1 at 12:17
$begingroup$
Since your answer is built on "flying fish can do it", it is relevant to consider that flying fish glide, they don't fly. They are limited by whatever force they can muster when they jump out of the water, and then they just coast until they land.
$endgroup$
– Flater
Apr 1 at 12:47
$begingroup$
Since your answer is built on "flying fish can do it", it is relevant to consider that flying fish glide, they don't fly. They are limited by whatever force they can muster when they jump out of the water, and then they just coast until they land.
$endgroup$
– Flater
Apr 1 at 12:47
1
1
$begingroup$
@Flater I guess it also depends on the OP's definition of "flying" for the water dragons. If OP just needs short bursts of movement through air without fancy maneuvers or sustained flight, jump-and-glide could very well serve the purpose
$endgroup$
– Delioth
Apr 1 at 14:03
$begingroup$
@Flater I guess it also depends on the OP's definition of "flying" for the water dragons. If OP just needs short bursts of movement through air without fancy maneuvers or sustained flight, jump-and-glide could very well serve the purpose
$endgroup$
– Delioth
Apr 1 at 14:03
$begingroup$
@Delioth: Keep mind of the square cube law though. Surface area of the wing is a square, but a dragon's mass is a cube. When you scale the flying fish, you will reach a point where the wings won't properly glide anymore even though they may have the same relative size to the dragon's body as is the case for the flying fish.
$endgroup$
– Flater
Apr 1 at 14:15
$begingroup$
@Delioth: Keep mind of the square cube law though. Surface area of the wing is a square, but a dragon's mass is a cube. When you scale the flying fish, you will reach a point where the wings won't properly glide anymore even though they may have the same relative size to the dragon's body as is the case for the flying fish.
$endgroup$
– Flater
Apr 1 at 14:15
2
2
$begingroup$
What about steam powered jets, assuming these are fire-breathing dragons? Ingest water, add fire, expel as steam for initial propulsion
$endgroup$
– Mick O'Hea
Apr 1 at 15:08
$begingroup$
What about steam powered jets, assuming these are fire-breathing dragons? Ingest water, add fire, expel as steam for initial propulsion
$endgroup$
– Mick O'Hea
Apr 1 at 15:08
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f142896%2fcould-a-dragon-use-its-wings-to-swim%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
I don't know much about the physics or biology of this kind of thing, but it seems to me the needed motion for swimming vs flying is different? You push "down" against the air when flying, as opposed to pushing "back" against the water when swimming? So, anyone please correct me if I'm wrong but I feel like the range of motion is different for these two things and your dragons would need pretty versatile joints? I'm also now pretty interested in this question, looking forward to seeing what the science-literate folks on here say. P.S. Welcome to Stack Exchange
$endgroup$
– MarielS
Mar 31 at 20:58
$begingroup$
You are not a big fan of How to Train Your Dragon, are you?
$endgroup$
– Peter A. Schneider
Apr 1 at 12:35
4
$begingroup$
Considering dragons shouldn't even be able to fly I don't see why swimming would be a problem. The Guards! Guards! book from Terry Pratchett goes into great detail about how and why dragons are completely unrealistic and can't exist (while of course having a fully functional dragon in that story anyway). Unless you're talking of pretty small dragons ;)
$endgroup$
– Mark
Apr 1 at 13:04
1
$begingroup$
@Mark the discworld swamp dragons also suggest an alternative way that an aquatic species might be able to fly, by imitating a submarine-launched missile...
$endgroup$
– Starfish Prime
Apr 1 at 14:57
$begingroup$
Since you don't have a swim speed requirement, my first thought went to sea-flap-flap dragon. Also, for "limited time" do flying fish count as meeting that? X3
$endgroup$
– Tezra
Apr 1 at 16:41