Graph of the history of databases Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)What is the history of data compression tools on personal computers?The history of context switchAre there any articles elucidating the history of the POPCOUNT instruction?Power of university computer in the '70s?History behind the text column restrictionWhat is the history of the PDP-11 MARK instruction?MITS to Dell: the mail order gap?History of Ctrl-S and Ctrl-Q for flow controlHistory of the demise of Matrox from the world of 3D graphics cardsHistory of advanced hardware
Can a zero nonce be safely used with AES-GCM if the key is random and never used again?
What did Darwin mean by 'squib' here?
Antler Helmet: Can it work?
When is phishing education going too far?
Can a monk deflect thrown melee weapons?
What items from the Roman-age tech-level could be used to deter all creatures from entering a small area?
Did the new image of black hole confirm the general theory of relativity?
What do I do if technical issues prevent me from filing my return on time?
How to market an anarchic city as a tourism spot to people living in civilized areas?
Geometric mean and geometric standard deviation
Blender game recording at the wrong time
What is the largest species of polychaete?
How can I make names more distinctive without making them longer?
What's the point in a preamp?
How to say that you spent the night with someone, you were only sleeping and nothing else?
Limit for e and 1/e
How do I keep my slimes from escaping their pens?
What would be Julian Assange's expected punishment, on the current English criminal law?
Active filter with series inductor and resistor - do these exist?
Can I throw a longsword at someone?
I'm thinking of a number
I'm having difficulty getting my players to do stuff in a sandbox campaign
Unable to start mainnet node docker container
How should I respond to a player wanting to catch a sword between their hands?
Graph of the history of databases
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)What is the history of data compression tools on personal computers?The history of context switchAre there any articles elucidating the history of the POPCOUNT instruction?Power of university computer in the '70s?History behind the text column restrictionWhat is the history of the PDP-11 MARK instruction?MITS to Dell: the mail order gap?History of Ctrl-S and Ctrl-Q for flow controlHistory of the demise of Matrox from the world of 3D graphics cardsHistory of advanced hardware
There are several nice graphs (in the computer science sense: nodes and arcs) of the history of programming languages, such as http://rigaux.org/language-study/diagram.html
I haven't found one of operating systems in general, but there was one for UNIX around somewhere, and this one for Linux distributions was easy to find: https://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/linux-kernel-history-and-distribution-time-line.html
Database systems have a rich and tangled history, for most of which as far as I can tell documentation exists, but is not as easy to find as for more familiar matters such as home computing.
Does there exist a graph or other form of comprehensive overview of the history of database and ERP systems?
history databases
asked Mar 31 at 21:35
rwallacerwallace
10.7k454159
add a comment |
There are several nice graphs (in the computer science sense: nodes and arcs) of the history of programming languages, such as http://rigaux.org/language-study/diagram.html
I haven't found one of operating systems in general, but there was one for UNIX around somewhere, and this one for Linux distributions was easy to find: https://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/linux-kernel-history-and-distribution-time-line.html
Database systems have a rich and tangled history, for most of which as far as I can tell documentation exists, but is not as easy to find as for more familiar matters such as home computing.
Does there exist a graph or other form of comprehensive overview of the history of database and ERP systems?
history databases
asked Mar 31 at 21:35
rwallacerwallace
10.7k454159
3
While the topic is interesting, this question asks of a kind of list answer (in graphic form) - eventually even a link only answer, a fact making it non-fitting to RC.SE, doesn't it?
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 0:06
add a comment |
There are several nice graphs (in the computer science sense: nodes and arcs) of the history of programming languages, such as http://rigaux.org/language-study/diagram.html
I haven't found one of operating systems in general, but there was one for UNIX around somewhere, and this one for Linux distributions was easy to find: https://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/linux-kernel-history-and-distribution-time-line.html
Database systems have a rich and tangled history, for most of which as far as I can tell documentation exists, but is not as easy to find as for more familiar matters such as home computing.
Does there exist a graph or other form of comprehensive overview of the history of database and ERP systems?
history databases
asked Mar 31 at 21:35
rwallacerwallace
10.7k454159
There are several nice graphs (in the computer science sense: nodes and arcs) of the history of programming languages, such as http://rigaux.org/language-study/diagram.html
I haven't found one of operating systems in general, but there was one for UNIX around somewhere, and this one for Linux distributions was easy to find: https://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/linux-kernel-history-and-distribution-time-line.html
Database systems have a rich and tangled history, for most of which as far as I can tell documentation exists, but is not as easy to find as for more familiar matters such as home computing.
Does there exist a graph or other form of comprehensive overview of the history of database and ERP systems?
history databases
history databases
asked Mar 31 at 21:35
rwallacerwallace
10.7k454159
asked Mar 31 at 21:35
rwallacerwallace
10.7k454159
asked Mar 31 at 21:35
rwallacerwallace
10.7k454159
asked Mar 31 at 21:35
rwallacerwallace
10.7k454159
asked Mar 31 at 21:35
rwallacerwallace
10.7k454159
10.7k454159
3
While the topic is interesting, this question asks of a kind of list answer (in graphic form) - eventually even a link only answer, a fact making it non-fitting to RC.SE, doesn't it?
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 0:06
add a comment |
3
While the topic is interesting, this question asks of a kind of list answer (in graphic form) - eventually even a link only answer, a fact making it non-fitting to RC.SE, doesn't it?
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 0:06
3
3
While the topic is interesting, this question asks of a kind of list answer (in graphic form) - eventually even a link only answer, a fact making it non-fitting to RC.SE, doesn't it?
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 0:06
While the topic is interesting, this question asks of a kind of list answer (in graphic form) - eventually even a link only answer, a fact making it non-fitting to RC.SE, doesn't it?
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 0:06
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
the german wikipedia article on databases mentions the
Genealogy of Relational Database Management Systems
you can find it at
https://hpi.de/naumann/projects/rdbms-genealogy.html
answered Mar 31 at 22:39
UliUli
34124
Well, this is quite a link only anyswer - not your fault, as the question asks for som. Also, the graph is missing out many data base system while focusing rather on Modern (and PC-Alike) developments, this
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 0:05
@Raffzahn I've only had a brief look at it but it seems reasonably comprehensive to me. What do you think is missing (granted that it focuses on relational databases only)?
– JeremyP
Apr 1 at 10:15
1
@JeremyP Next to all prior mainframe products. And yes, most important, everythin that didn't sell itself as relational.
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 13:48
@Raffzahn It advertises itself as a genealogy of relational database management systems. You wouldn't expect to see non relational systems in there. And there weren't any significant relational database management systems before IBM invented them.
– JeremyP
Apr 2 at 8:41
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "648"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fretrocomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9497%2fgraph-of-the-history-of-databases%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
the german wikipedia article on databases mentions the
Genealogy of Relational Database Management Systems
you can find it at
https://hpi.de/naumann/projects/rdbms-genealogy.html
answered Mar 31 at 22:39
UliUli
34124
Well, this is quite a link only anyswer - not your fault, as the question asks for som. Also, the graph is missing out many data base system while focusing rather on Modern (and PC-Alike) developments, this
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 0:05
@Raffzahn I've only had a brief look at it but it seems reasonably comprehensive to me. What do you think is missing (granted that it focuses on relational databases only)?
– JeremyP
Apr 1 at 10:15
1
@JeremyP Next to all prior mainframe products. And yes, most important, everythin that didn't sell itself as relational.
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 13:48
@Raffzahn It advertises itself as a genealogy of relational database management systems. You wouldn't expect to see non relational systems in there. And there weren't any significant relational database management systems before IBM invented them.
– JeremyP
Apr 2 at 8:41
add a comment |
the german wikipedia article on databases mentions the
Genealogy of Relational Database Management Systems
you can find it at
https://hpi.de/naumann/projects/rdbms-genealogy.html
answered Mar 31 at 22:39
UliUli
34124
Well, this is quite a link only anyswer - not your fault, as the question asks for som. Also, the graph is missing out many data base system while focusing rather on Modern (and PC-Alike) developments, this
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 0:05
@Raffzahn I've only had a brief look at it but it seems reasonably comprehensive to me. What do you think is missing (granted that it focuses on relational databases only)?
– JeremyP
Apr 1 at 10:15
1
@JeremyP Next to all prior mainframe products. And yes, most important, everythin that didn't sell itself as relational.
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 13:48
@Raffzahn It advertises itself as a genealogy of relational database management systems. You wouldn't expect to see non relational systems in there. And there weren't any significant relational database management systems before IBM invented them.
– JeremyP
Apr 2 at 8:41
add a comment |
the german wikipedia article on databases mentions the
Genealogy of Relational Database Management Systems
you can find it at
https://hpi.de/naumann/projects/rdbms-genealogy.html
answered Mar 31 at 22:39
UliUli
34124
the german wikipedia article on databases mentions the
Genealogy of Relational Database Management Systems
you can find it at
https://hpi.de/naumann/projects/rdbms-genealogy.html
answered Mar 31 at 22:39
UliUli
34124
answered Mar 31 at 22:39
UliUli
34124
answered Mar 31 at 22:39
UliUli
34124
answered Mar 31 at 22:39
UliUli
34124
34124
Well, this is quite a link only anyswer - not your fault, as the question asks for som. Also, the graph is missing out many data base system while focusing rather on Modern (and PC-Alike) developments, this
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 0:05
@Raffzahn I've only had a brief look at it but it seems reasonably comprehensive to me. What do you think is missing (granted that it focuses on relational databases only)?
– JeremyP
Apr 1 at 10:15
1
@JeremyP Next to all prior mainframe products. And yes, most important, everythin that didn't sell itself as relational.
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 13:48
@Raffzahn It advertises itself as a genealogy of relational database management systems. You wouldn't expect to see non relational systems in there. And there weren't any significant relational database management systems before IBM invented them.
– JeremyP
Apr 2 at 8:41
add a comment |
Well, this is quite a link only anyswer - not your fault, as the question asks for som. Also, the graph is missing out many data base system while focusing rather on Modern (and PC-Alike) developments, this
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 0:05
@Raffzahn I've only had a brief look at it but it seems reasonably comprehensive to me. What do you think is missing (granted that it focuses on relational databases only)?
– JeremyP
Apr 1 at 10:15
1
@JeremyP Next to all prior mainframe products. And yes, most important, everythin that didn't sell itself as relational.
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 13:48
@Raffzahn It advertises itself as a genealogy of relational database management systems. You wouldn't expect to see non relational systems in there. And there weren't any significant relational database management systems before IBM invented them.
– JeremyP
Apr 2 at 8:41
Well, this is quite a link only anyswer - not your fault, as the question asks for som. Also, the graph is missing out many data base system while focusing rather on Modern (and PC-Alike) developments, this
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 0:05
Well, this is quite a link only anyswer - not your fault, as the question asks for som. Also, the graph is missing out many data base system while focusing rather on Modern (and PC-Alike) developments, this
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 0:05
@Raffzahn I've only had a brief look at it but it seems reasonably comprehensive to me. What do you think is missing (granted that it focuses on relational databases only)?
– JeremyP
Apr 1 at 10:15
@Raffzahn I've only had a brief look at it but it seems reasonably comprehensive to me. What do you think is missing (granted that it focuses on relational databases only)?
– JeremyP
Apr 1 at 10:15
1
1
@JeremyP Next to all prior mainframe products. And yes, most important, everythin that didn't sell itself as relational.
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 13:48
@JeremyP Next to all prior mainframe products. And yes, most important, everythin that didn't sell itself as relational.
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 13:48
@Raffzahn It advertises itself as a genealogy of relational database management systems. You wouldn't expect to see non relational systems in there. And there weren't any significant relational database management systems before IBM invented them.
– JeremyP
Apr 2 at 8:41
@Raffzahn It advertises itself as a genealogy of relational database management systems. You wouldn't expect to see non relational systems in there. And there weren't any significant relational database management systems before IBM invented them.
– JeremyP
Apr 2 at 8:41
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Retrocomputing Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fretrocomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f9497%2fgraph-of-the-history-of-databases%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
While the topic is interesting, this question asks of a kind of list answer (in graphic form) - eventually even a link only answer, a fact making it non-fitting to RC.SE, doesn't it?
– Raffzahn
Apr 1 at 0:06