Integer addition + constant, is it a group?A question about groups: may I substitute a binary operation with a function?Does $log$ of positive rationals form a group under addition?Equivalence class is a group - request for proof-verification.Proving that the unities of a ring form a group under multiplicationTo prove in a Group Left identity and left inverse implies right identity and right inverseAre $(mathbbR - 0, times)$ and $(mathbbR, +)$ the same group? What is its name?Show that $G$ is a groupProving translations in R and rotations in C are groups under compositionDoes the set of all symmetries of a plane figure form a group under composition of functions?Let $G = mathbb R$ together with the operation $x*y = x + y + xy,; forall x,yin mathbb R$

Personal Teleportation: From Rags to Riches

Fair gambler's ruin problem intuition

How to travel to Japan while expressing milk?

Is it a bad idea to plug the other end of ESD strap to wall ground?

Get order collection by order id in Magento 2?

Forgetting the musical notes while performing in concert

How to stretch the corners of this image so that it looks like a perfect rectangle?

Is it possible to create a QR code using text?

How do I gain back my faith in my PhD degree?

meaning of 腰を落としている

Is Mindfulness the Opposite of Multitasking?

How can I deal with my CEO asking me to hire someone with a higher salary than me, a co-founder?

How can saying a song's name be a copyright violation?

Avoiding the "not like other girls" trope?

How could indestructible materials be used in power generation?

Are characters in a string unique

Amending the P2P Layer

Two tailed t test for two companies' monthly profits

Why is it a bad idea to hire a hitman to eliminate most corrupt politicians?

Is it inappropriate for a student to attend their mentor's dissertation defense?

How do conventional missiles fly?

In Bayesian inference, why are some terms dropped from the posterior predictive?

Is there an expression that means doing something right before you will need it rather than doing it in case you might need it?

How do I exit BASH while loop using modulus operator?



Integer addition + constant, is it a group?


A question about groups: may I substitute a binary operation with a function?Does $log$ of positive rationals form a group under addition?Equivalence class is a group - request for proof-verification.Proving that the unities of a ring form a group under multiplicationTo prove in a Group Left identity and left inverse implies right identity and right inverseAre $(mathbbR - 0, times)$ and $(mathbbR, +)$ the same group? What is its name?Show that $G$ is a groupProving translations in R and rotations in C are groups under compositionDoes the set of all symmetries of a plane figure form a group under composition of functions?Let $G = mathbb R$ together with the operation $x*y = x + y + xy,; forall x,yin mathbb R$













8












$begingroup$


Assume we define an operator $$acirc b = a+b+k, \forall a,bin mathbb Z$$



Can we prove that it together with range for $a,b$ is a group, for any given $kin mathbb Z$?



I have tried, and found that it fulfills all group axioms, but I might have made a mistake?



If it is a group, does it have a name?




My observations:



  • Closure is obvious as addition of integers is closed.


  • Identity If we take $e=-k$, then $acirc e = a+k-k=a$


Verification $ecirc a = -kcirc a = -k+a+k=a$, as required.




  • Inverse would be $a^-1 = -a-2k$, which is unique.

Verification of inverse $acirc a^-1 = a + (-a-2k)+k = -k = e$, as required.




  • Associativity $(acirc b) circ c = (a + (b+k)) + (c + k)$.

We see everything involved is addition, which is associative, so we can remove parentheses and change order as we wish.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Yes, it is group. (I solved this problem as homework in uni once)
    $endgroup$
    – Vladislav
    Mar 27 at 17:14







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    How would we know if you've made a mistake when you haven't shared your work on the problem?
    $endgroup$
    – Shaun
    Mar 27 at 17:14






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You might very well have made a mistake. We don't know what you did. Just because you got a correct result doesn't mean you didn't make a mistake.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Mar 27 at 17:17






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Well, you have to show associativity as well....
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Mar 27 at 17:21






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @fleablood: The question was a reasonable one. Many groups have names. (And who is this Clarence, anyway? Is he abelian, and countably infinite?)
    $endgroup$
    – TonyK
    Mar 27 at 20:03















8












$begingroup$


Assume we define an operator $$acirc b = a+b+k, \forall a,bin mathbb Z$$



Can we prove that it together with range for $a,b$ is a group, for any given $kin mathbb Z$?



I have tried, and found that it fulfills all group axioms, but I might have made a mistake?



If it is a group, does it have a name?




My observations:



  • Closure is obvious as addition of integers is closed.


  • Identity If we take $e=-k$, then $acirc e = a+k-k=a$


Verification $ecirc a = -kcirc a = -k+a+k=a$, as required.




  • Inverse would be $a^-1 = -a-2k$, which is unique.

Verification of inverse $acirc a^-1 = a + (-a-2k)+k = -k = e$, as required.




  • Associativity $(acirc b) circ c = (a + (b+k)) + (c + k)$.

We see everything involved is addition, which is associative, so we can remove parentheses and change order as we wish.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Yes, it is group. (I solved this problem as homework in uni once)
    $endgroup$
    – Vladislav
    Mar 27 at 17:14







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    How would we know if you've made a mistake when you haven't shared your work on the problem?
    $endgroup$
    – Shaun
    Mar 27 at 17:14






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You might very well have made a mistake. We don't know what you did. Just because you got a correct result doesn't mean you didn't make a mistake.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Mar 27 at 17:17






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Well, you have to show associativity as well....
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Mar 27 at 17:21






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @fleablood: The question was a reasonable one. Many groups have names. (And who is this Clarence, anyway? Is he abelian, and countably infinite?)
    $endgroup$
    – TonyK
    Mar 27 at 20:03













8












8








8


2



$begingroup$


Assume we define an operator $$acirc b = a+b+k, \forall a,bin mathbb Z$$



Can we prove that it together with range for $a,b$ is a group, for any given $kin mathbb Z$?



I have tried, and found that it fulfills all group axioms, but I might have made a mistake?



If it is a group, does it have a name?




My observations:



  • Closure is obvious as addition of integers is closed.


  • Identity If we take $e=-k$, then $acirc e = a+k-k=a$


Verification $ecirc a = -kcirc a = -k+a+k=a$, as required.




  • Inverse would be $a^-1 = -a-2k$, which is unique.

Verification of inverse $acirc a^-1 = a + (-a-2k)+k = -k = e$, as required.




  • Associativity $(acirc b) circ c = (a + (b+k)) + (c + k)$.

We see everything involved is addition, which is associative, so we can remove parentheses and change order as we wish.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Assume we define an operator $$acirc b = a+b+k, \forall a,bin mathbb Z$$



Can we prove that it together with range for $a,b$ is a group, for any given $kin mathbb Z$?



I have tried, and found that it fulfills all group axioms, but I might have made a mistake?



If it is a group, does it have a name?




My observations:



  • Closure is obvious as addition of integers is closed.


  • Identity If we take $e=-k$, then $acirc e = a+k-k=a$


Verification $ecirc a = -kcirc a = -k+a+k=a$, as required.




  • Inverse would be $a^-1 = -a-2k$, which is unique.

Verification of inverse $acirc a^-1 = a + (-a-2k)+k = -k = e$, as required.




  • Associativity $(acirc b) circ c = (a + (b+k)) + (c + k)$.

We see everything involved is addition, which is associative, so we can remove parentheses and change order as we wish.







abstract-algebra group-theory arithmetic






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 27 at 21:56







mathreadler

















asked Mar 27 at 17:02









mathreadlermathreadler

15.4k72263




15.4k72263







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Yes, it is group. (I solved this problem as homework in uni once)
    $endgroup$
    – Vladislav
    Mar 27 at 17:14







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    How would we know if you've made a mistake when you haven't shared your work on the problem?
    $endgroup$
    – Shaun
    Mar 27 at 17:14






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You might very well have made a mistake. We don't know what you did. Just because you got a correct result doesn't mean you didn't make a mistake.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Mar 27 at 17:17






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Well, you have to show associativity as well....
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Mar 27 at 17:21






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @fleablood: The question was a reasonable one. Many groups have names. (And who is this Clarence, anyway? Is he abelian, and countably infinite?)
    $endgroup$
    – TonyK
    Mar 27 at 20:03












  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Yes, it is group. (I solved this problem as homework in uni once)
    $endgroup$
    – Vladislav
    Mar 27 at 17:14







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    How would we know if you've made a mistake when you haven't shared your work on the problem?
    $endgroup$
    – Shaun
    Mar 27 at 17:14






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You might very well have made a mistake. We don't know what you did. Just because you got a correct result doesn't mean you didn't make a mistake.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Mar 27 at 17:17






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Well, you have to show associativity as well....
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    Mar 27 at 17:21






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @fleablood: The question was a reasonable one. Many groups have names. (And who is this Clarence, anyway? Is he abelian, and countably infinite?)
    $endgroup$
    – TonyK
    Mar 27 at 20:03







3




3




$begingroup$
Yes, it is group. (I solved this problem as homework in uni once)
$endgroup$
– Vladislav
Mar 27 at 17:14





$begingroup$
Yes, it is group. (I solved this problem as homework in uni once)
$endgroup$
– Vladislav
Mar 27 at 17:14





2




2




$begingroup$
How would we know if you've made a mistake when you haven't shared your work on the problem?
$endgroup$
– Shaun
Mar 27 at 17:14




$begingroup$
How would we know if you've made a mistake when you haven't shared your work on the problem?
$endgroup$
– Shaun
Mar 27 at 17:14




1




1




$begingroup$
You might very well have made a mistake. We don't know what you did. Just because you got a correct result doesn't mean you didn't make a mistake.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 27 at 17:17




$begingroup$
You might very well have made a mistake. We don't know what you did. Just because you got a correct result doesn't mean you didn't make a mistake.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 27 at 17:17




1




1




$begingroup$
Well, you have to show associativity as well....
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 27 at 17:21




$begingroup$
Well, you have to show associativity as well....
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 27 at 17:21




2




2




$begingroup$
@fleablood: The question was a reasonable one. Many groups have names. (And who is this Clarence, anyway? Is he abelian, and countably infinite?)
$endgroup$
– TonyK
Mar 27 at 20:03




$begingroup$
@fleablood: The question was a reasonable one. Many groups have names. (And who is this Clarence, anyway? Is he abelian, and countably infinite?)
$endgroup$
– TonyK
Mar 27 at 20:03










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















11












$begingroup$

It's the group you get when you transfer the action of $(mathbb Z,+)$ to $(mathbb Z, circ)$ via the map $phi(z)= z-k$.



You can check that $phi(a+b)=phi(a)circphi(b)$ so that becomes a group isomorphism.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    How can I learn which maps transfer a group to another?
    $endgroup$
    – mathreadler
    Mar 27 at 17:32






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @mathreadler Every bijection can be used to do that. There is nothing special about the bijection chosen.
    $endgroup$
    – rschwieb
    Mar 27 at 19:28



















4












$begingroup$

Yes, your observations are correct - this is a group.



Moreover, this group is isomorphic to the infinite cyclic group $C_infty$.



To prove that you can see, that $forall a in mathbbZ, a circ (1-k) = (a+1)$, which results in $forall a in mathbbZ, a = (1 - k)^circ(a + k - 1)$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for the insight. I think I understand. However I am not so used to abstract algebra I am completely confident with isomorphic and all other words.
    $endgroup$
    – mathreadler
    Mar 27 at 22:00










  • $begingroup$
    "$forall a in mathbbZ a circ (1-k) = (a+1)$" is nigh-unreadable. Better is "$forall a in mathbbZ$, $a circ (1-k) = (a+1)$" and still better is "For all $a in mathbb Z$, $a circ (1-k) = a+1$".
    $endgroup$
    – Misha Lavrov
    Mar 28 at 1:55


















3












$begingroup$

Suppose we define an operator $'$ as $a'=a-k$. Then $a'∘b'=(a-k)+(b-k)+k=a+b-k$. And $(a+b)'$ is also equal to $a+b-k$. So $a'∘b'=(a+b)'$.



And $a'$ is simply $a$ on a shifted number line. That is, if you take a number line, and treat $k$ as being the origin, then $a'$ is the distance $a$ is from $k$. Suppose you start a stopwatch at time 00:15. And suppose event A happens at 00:17, while event B happens at 00:18. If you just add the times of the two events, you get 00:35. But if you add the times on the stopwatch, you get 00:02+00:03=00:05. $∘$ would then represent adding the times on the stopwatch, with $k$=00:15.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Yep. Shifted number line is actually what first made me think of it. Coming from engineering background I know from before that geometric things such as rotations and translations in plane can be groups so surely something like this should be possible also on number line which in some sense must be less complicated.
    $endgroup$
    – mathreadler
    Mar 27 at 22:28












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3164781%2finteger-addition-constant-is-it-a-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









11












$begingroup$

It's the group you get when you transfer the action of $(mathbb Z,+)$ to $(mathbb Z, circ)$ via the map $phi(z)= z-k$.



You can check that $phi(a+b)=phi(a)circphi(b)$ so that becomes a group isomorphism.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    How can I learn which maps transfer a group to another?
    $endgroup$
    – mathreadler
    Mar 27 at 17:32






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @mathreadler Every bijection can be used to do that. There is nothing special about the bijection chosen.
    $endgroup$
    – rschwieb
    Mar 27 at 19:28
















11












$begingroup$

It's the group you get when you transfer the action of $(mathbb Z,+)$ to $(mathbb Z, circ)$ via the map $phi(z)= z-k$.



You can check that $phi(a+b)=phi(a)circphi(b)$ so that becomes a group isomorphism.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    How can I learn which maps transfer a group to another?
    $endgroup$
    – mathreadler
    Mar 27 at 17:32






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @mathreadler Every bijection can be used to do that. There is nothing special about the bijection chosen.
    $endgroup$
    – rschwieb
    Mar 27 at 19:28














11












11








11





$begingroup$

It's the group you get when you transfer the action of $(mathbb Z,+)$ to $(mathbb Z, circ)$ via the map $phi(z)= z-k$.



You can check that $phi(a+b)=phi(a)circphi(b)$ so that becomes a group isomorphism.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



It's the group you get when you transfer the action of $(mathbb Z,+)$ to $(mathbb Z, circ)$ via the map $phi(z)= z-k$.



You can check that $phi(a+b)=phi(a)circphi(b)$ so that becomes a group isomorphism.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Mar 27 at 17:27









rschwiebrschwieb

107k12103252




107k12103252











  • $begingroup$
    How can I learn which maps transfer a group to another?
    $endgroup$
    – mathreadler
    Mar 27 at 17:32






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @mathreadler Every bijection can be used to do that. There is nothing special about the bijection chosen.
    $endgroup$
    – rschwieb
    Mar 27 at 19:28

















  • $begingroup$
    How can I learn which maps transfer a group to another?
    $endgroup$
    – mathreadler
    Mar 27 at 17:32






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @mathreadler Every bijection can be used to do that. There is nothing special about the bijection chosen.
    $endgroup$
    – rschwieb
    Mar 27 at 19:28
















$begingroup$
How can I learn which maps transfer a group to another?
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Mar 27 at 17:32




$begingroup$
How can I learn which maps transfer a group to another?
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Mar 27 at 17:32




1




1




$begingroup$
@mathreadler Every bijection can be used to do that. There is nothing special about the bijection chosen.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Mar 27 at 19:28





$begingroup$
@mathreadler Every bijection can be used to do that. There is nothing special about the bijection chosen.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Mar 27 at 19:28












4












$begingroup$

Yes, your observations are correct - this is a group.



Moreover, this group is isomorphic to the infinite cyclic group $C_infty$.



To prove that you can see, that $forall a in mathbbZ, a circ (1-k) = (a+1)$, which results in $forall a in mathbbZ, a = (1 - k)^circ(a + k - 1)$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for the insight. I think I understand. However I am not so used to abstract algebra I am completely confident with isomorphic and all other words.
    $endgroup$
    – mathreadler
    Mar 27 at 22:00










  • $begingroup$
    "$forall a in mathbbZ a circ (1-k) = (a+1)$" is nigh-unreadable. Better is "$forall a in mathbbZ$, $a circ (1-k) = (a+1)$" and still better is "For all $a in mathbb Z$, $a circ (1-k) = a+1$".
    $endgroup$
    – Misha Lavrov
    Mar 28 at 1:55















4












$begingroup$

Yes, your observations are correct - this is a group.



Moreover, this group is isomorphic to the infinite cyclic group $C_infty$.



To prove that you can see, that $forall a in mathbbZ, a circ (1-k) = (a+1)$, which results in $forall a in mathbbZ, a = (1 - k)^circ(a + k - 1)$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for the insight. I think I understand. However I am not so used to abstract algebra I am completely confident with isomorphic and all other words.
    $endgroup$
    – mathreadler
    Mar 27 at 22:00










  • $begingroup$
    "$forall a in mathbbZ a circ (1-k) = (a+1)$" is nigh-unreadable. Better is "$forall a in mathbbZ$, $a circ (1-k) = (a+1)$" and still better is "For all $a in mathbb Z$, $a circ (1-k) = a+1$".
    $endgroup$
    – Misha Lavrov
    Mar 28 at 1:55













4












4








4





$begingroup$

Yes, your observations are correct - this is a group.



Moreover, this group is isomorphic to the infinite cyclic group $C_infty$.



To prove that you can see, that $forall a in mathbbZ, a circ (1-k) = (a+1)$, which results in $forall a in mathbbZ, a = (1 - k)^circ(a + k - 1)$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Yes, your observations are correct - this is a group.



Moreover, this group is isomorphic to the infinite cyclic group $C_infty$.



To prove that you can see, that $forall a in mathbbZ, a circ (1-k) = (a+1)$, which results in $forall a in mathbbZ, a = (1 - k)^circ(a + k - 1)$.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Mar 28 at 7:08

























answered Mar 27 at 17:26









Yanior WegYanior Weg

2,72711446




2,72711446











  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for the insight. I think I understand. However I am not so used to abstract algebra I am completely confident with isomorphic and all other words.
    $endgroup$
    – mathreadler
    Mar 27 at 22:00










  • $begingroup$
    "$forall a in mathbbZ a circ (1-k) = (a+1)$" is nigh-unreadable. Better is "$forall a in mathbbZ$, $a circ (1-k) = (a+1)$" and still better is "For all $a in mathbb Z$, $a circ (1-k) = a+1$".
    $endgroup$
    – Misha Lavrov
    Mar 28 at 1:55
















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you for the insight. I think I understand. However I am not so used to abstract algebra I am completely confident with isomorphic and all other words.
    $endgroup$
    – mathreadler
    Mar 27 at 22:00










  • $begingroup$
    "$forall a in mathbbZ a circ (1-k) = (a+1)$" is nigh-unreadable. Better is "$forall a in mathbbZ$, $a circ (1-k) = (a+1)$" and still better is "For all $a in mathbb Z$, $a circ (1-k) = a+1$".
    $endgroup$
    – Misha Lavrov
    Mar 28 at 1:55















$begingroup$
Thank you for the insight. I think I understand. However I am not so used to abstract algebra I am completely confident with isomorphic and all other words.
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Mar 27 at 22:00




$begingroup$
Thank you for the insight. I think I understand. However I am not so used to abstract algebra I am completely confident with isomorphic and all other words.
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Mar 27 at 22:00












$begingroup$
"$forall a in mathbbZ a circ (1-k) = (a+1)$" is nigh-unreadable. Better is "$forall a in mathbbZ$, $a circ (1-k) = (a+1)$" and still better is "For all $a in mathbb Z$, $a circ (1-k) = a+1$".
$endgroup$
– Misha Lavrov
Mar 28 at 1:55




$begingroup$
"$forall a in mathbbZ a circ (1-k) = (a+1)$" is nigh-unreadable. Better is "$forall a in mathbbZ$, $a circ (1-k) = (a+1)$" and still better is "For all $a in mathbb Z$, $a circ (1-k) = a+1$".
$endgroup$
– Misha Lavrov
Mar 28 at 1:55











3












$begingroup$

Suppose we define an operator $'$ as $a'=a-k$. Then $a'∘b'=(a-k)+(b-k)+k=a+b-k$. And $(a+b)'$ is also equal to $a+b-k$. So $a'∘b'=(a+b)'$.



And $a'$ is simply $a$ on a shifted number line. That is, if you take a number line, and treat $k$ as being the origin, then $a'$ is the distance $a$ is from $k$. Suppose you start a stopwatch at time 00:15. And suppose event A happens at 00:17, while event B happens at 00:18. If you just add the times of the two events, you get 00:35. But if you add the times on the stopwatch, you get 00:02+00:03=00:05. $∘$ would then represent adding the times on the stopwatch, with $k$=00:15.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Yep. Shifted number line is actually what first made me think of it. Coming from engineering background I know from before that geometric things such as rotations and translations in plane can be groups so surely something like this should be possible also on number line which in some sense must be less complicated.
    $endgroup$
    – mathreadler
    Mar 27 at 22:28
















3












$begingroup$

Suppose we define an operator $'$ as $a'=a-k$. Then $a'∘b'=(a-k)+(b-k)+k=a+b-k$. And $(a+b)'$ is also equal to $a+b-k$. So $a'∘b'=(a+b)'$.



And $a'$ is simply $a$ on a shifted number line. That is, if you take a number line, and treat $k$ as being the origin, then $a'$ is the distance $a$ is from $k$. Suppose you start a stopwatch at time 00:15. And suppose event A happens at 00:17, while event B happens at 00:18. If you just add the times of the two events, you get 00:35. But if you add the times on the stopwatch, you get 00:02+00:03=00:05. $∘$ would then represent adding the times on the stopwatch, with $k$=00:15.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Yep. Shifted number line is actually what first made me think of it. Coming from engineering background I know from before that geometric things such as rotations and translations in plane can be groups so surely something like this should be possible also on number line which in some sense must be less complicated.
    $endgroup$
    – mathreadler
    Mar 27 at 22:28














3












3








3





$begingroup$

Suppose we define an operator $'$ as $a'=a-k$. Then $a'∘b'=(a-k)+(b-k)+k=a+b-k$. And $(a+b)'$ is also equal to $a+b-k$. So $a'∘b'=(a+b)'$.



And $a'$ is simply $a$ on a shifted number line. That is, if you take a number line, and treat $k$ as being the origin, then $a'$ is the distance $a$ is from $k$. Suppose you start a stopwatch at time 00:15. And suppose event A happens at 00:17, while event B happens at 00:18. If you just add the times of the two events, you get 00:35. But if you add the times on the stopwatch, you get 00:02+00:03=00:05. $∘$ would then represent adding the times on the stopwatch, with $k$=00:15.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Suppose we define an operator $'$ as $a'=a-k$. Then $a'∘b'=(a-k)+(b-k)+k=a+b-k$. And $(a+b)'$ is also equal to $a+b-k$. So $a'∘b'=(a+b)'$.



And $a'$ is simply $a$ on a shifted number line. That is, if you take a number line, and treat $k$ as being the origin, then $a'$ is the distance $a$ is from $k$. Suppose you start a stopwatch at time 00:15. And suppose event A happens at 00:17, while event B happens at 00:18. If you just add the times of the two events, you get 00:35. But if you add the times on the stopwatch, you get 00:02+00:03=00:05. $∘$ would then represent adding the times on the stopwatch, with $k$=00:15.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Mar 27 at 22:16









AcccumulationAcccumulation

7,2052619




7,2052619











  • $begingroup$
    Yep. Shifted number line is actually what first made me think of it. Coming from engineering background I know from before that geometric things such as rotations and translations in plane can be groups so surely something like this should be possible also on number line which in some sense must be less complicated.
    $endgroup$
    – mathreadler
    Mar 27 at 22:28

















  • $begingroup$
    Yep. Shifted number line is actually what first made me think of it. Coming from engineering background I know from before that geometric things such as rotations and translations in plane can be groups so surely something like this should be possible also on number line which in some sense must be less complicated.
    $endgroup$
    – mathreadler
    Mar 27 at 22:28
















$begingroup$
Yep. Shifted number line is actually what first made me think of it. Coming from engineering background I know from before that geometric things such as rotations and translations in plane can be groups so surely something like this should be possible also on number line which in some sense must be less complicated.
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Mar 27 at 22:28





$begingroup$
Yep. Shifted number line is actually what first made me think of it. Coming from engineering background I know from before that geometric things such as rotations and translations in plane can be groups so surely something like this should be possible also on number line which in some sense must be less complicated.
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Mar 27 at 22:28


















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3164781%2finteger-addition-constant-is-it-a-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Adding axes to figuresAdding axes labels to LaTeX figuresLaTeX equivalent of ConTeXt buffersRotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?adding axes to shapesAlign axes across subfiguresAdding figures with a certain orderLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themAdding axes labels to LaTeX figures

Tähtien Talli Jäsenet | Lähteet | NavigointivalikkoSuomen Hippos – Tähtien Talli

Do these cracks on my tires look bad? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowDry rot tire should I replace?Having to replace tiresFishtailed so easily? Bad tires? ABS?Filling the tires with something other than air, to avoid puncture hassles?Used Michelin tires safe to install?Do these tyre cracks necessitate replacement?Rumbling noise: tires or mechanicalIs it possible to fix noisy feathered tires?Are bad winter tires still better than summer tires in winter?Torque converter failure - Related to replacing only 2 tires?Why use snow tires on all 4 wheels on 2-wheel-drive cars?