Integer addition + constant, is it a group?A question about groups: may I substitute a binary operation with a function?Does $log$ of positive rationals form a group under addition?Equivalence class is a group - request for proof-verification.Proving that the unities of a ring form a group under multiplicationTo prove in a Group Left identity and left inverse implies right identity and right inverseAre $(mathbbR - 0, times)$ and $(mathbbR, +)$ the same group? What is its name?Show that $G$ is a groupProving translations in R and rotations in C are groups under compositionDoes the set of all symmetries of a plane figure form a group under composition of functions?Let $G = mathbb R$ together with the operation $x*y = x + y + xy,; forall x,yin mathbb R$
Personal Teleportation: From Rags to Riches
Fair gambler's ruin problem intuition
How to travel to Japan while expressing milk?
Is it a bad idea to plug the other end of ESD strap to wall ground?
Get order collection by order id in Magento 2?
Forgetting the musical notes while performing in concert
How to stretch the corners of this image so that it looks like a perfect rectangle?
Is it possible to create a QR code using text?
How do I gain back my faith in my PhD degree?
meaning of 腰を落としている
Is Mindfulness the Opposite of Multitasking?
How can I deal with my CEO asking me to hire someone with a higher salary than me, a co-founder?
How can saying a song's name be a copyright violation?
Avoiding the "not like other girls" trope?
How could indestructible materials be used in power generation?
Are characters in a string unique
Amending the P2P Layer
Two tailed t test for two companies' monthly profits
Why is it a bad idea to hire a hitman to eliminate most corrupt politicians?
Is it inappropriate for a student to attend their mentor's dissertation defense?
How do conventional missiles fly?
In Bayesian inference, why are some terms dropped from the posterior predictive?
Is there an expression that means doing something right before you will need it rather than doing it in case you might need it?
How do I exit BASH while loop using modulus operator?
Integer addition + constant, is it a group?
A question about groups: may I substitute a binary operation with a function?Does $log$ of positive rationals form a group under addition?Equivalence class is a group - request for proof-verification.Proving that the unities of a ring form a group under multiplicationTo prove in a Group Left identity and left inverse implies right identity and right inverseAre $(mathbbR - 0, times)$ and $(mathbbR, +)$ the same group? What is its name?Show that $G$ is a groupProving translations in R and rotations in C are groups under compositionDoes the set of all symmetries of a plane figure form a group under composition of functions?Let $G = mathbb R$ together with the operation $x*y = x + y + xy,; forall x,yin mathbb R$
$begingroup$
Assume we define an operator $$acirc b = a+b+k, \forall a,bin mathbb Z$$
Can we prove that it together with range for $a,b$ is a group, for any given $kin mathbb Z$?
I have tried, and found that it fulfills all group axioms, but I might have made a mistake?
If it is a group, does it have a name?
My observations:
Closure is obvious as addition of integers is closed.
Identity If we take $e=-k$, then $acirc e = a+k-k=a$
Verification $ecirc a = -kcirc a = -k+a+k=a$, as required.
Inverse would be $a^-1 = -a-2k$, which is unique.
Verification of inverse $acirc a^-1 = a + (-a-2k)+k = -k = e$, as required.
Associativity $(acirc b) circ c = (a + (b+k)) + (c + k)$.
We see everything involved is addition, which is associative, so we can remove parentheses and change order as we wish.
abstract-algebra group-theory arithmetic
$endgroup$
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
Assume we define an operator $$acirc b = a+b+k, \forall a,bin mathbb Z$$
Can we prove that it together with range for $a,b$ is a group, for any given $kin mathbb Z$?
I have tried, and found that it fulfills all group axioms, but I might have made a mistake?
If it is a group, does it have a name?
My observations:
Closure is obvious as addition of integers is closed.
Identity If we take $e=-k$, then $acirc e = a+k-k=a$
Verification $ecirc a = -kcirc a = -k+a+k=a$, as required.
Inverse would be $a^-1 = -a-2k$, which is unique.
Verification of inverse $acirc a^-1 = a + (-a-2k)+k = -k = e$, as required.
Associativity $(acirc b) circ c = (a + (b+k)) + (c + k)$.
We see everything involved is addition, which is associative, so we can remove parentheses and change order as we wish.
abstract-algebra group-theory arithmetic
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
Yes, it is group. (I solved this problem as homework in uni once)
$endgroup$
– Vladislav
Mar 27 at 17:14
2
$begingroup$
How would we know if you've made a mistake when you haven't shared your work on the problem?
$endgroup$
– Shaun
Mar 27 at 17:14
1
$begingroup$
You might very well have made a mistake. We don't know what you did. Just because you got a correct result doesn't mean you didn't make a mistake.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 27 at 17:17
1
$begingroup$
Well, you have to show associativity as well....
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 27 at 17:21
2
$begingroup$
@fleablood: The question was a reasonable one. Many groups have names. (And who is this Clarence, anyway? Is he abelian, and countably infinite?)
$endgroup$
– TonyK
Mar 27 at 20:03
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
Assume we define an operator $$acirc b = a+b+k, \forall a,bin mathbb Z$$
Can we prove that it together with range for $a,b$ is a group, for any given $kin mathbb Z$?
I have tried, and found that it fulfills all group axioms, but I might have made a mistake?
If it is a group, does it have a name?
My observations:
Closure is obvious as addition of integers is closed.
Identity If we take $e=-k$, then $acirc e = a+k-k=a$
Verification $ecirc a = -kcirc a = -k+a+k=a$, as required.
Inverse would be $a^-1 = -a-2k$, which is unique.
Verification of inverse $acirc a^-1 = a + (-a-2k)+k = -k = e$, as required.
Associativity $(acirc b) circ c = (a + (b+k)) + (c + k)$.
We see everything involved is addition, which is associative, so we can remove parentheses and change order as we wish.
abstract-algebra group-theory arithmetic
$endgroup$
Assume we define an operator $$acirc b = a+b+k, \forall a,bin mathbb Z$$
Can we prove that it together with range for $a,b$ is a group, for any given $kin mathbb Z$?
I have tried, and found that it fulfills all group axioms, but I might have made a mistake?
If it is a group, does it have a name?
My observations:
Closure is obvious as addition of integers is closed.
Identity If we take $e=-k$, then $acirc e = a+k-k=a$
Verification $ecirc a = -kcirc a = -k+a+k=a$, as required.
Inverse would be $a^-1 = -a-2k$, which is unique.
Verification of inverse $acirc a^-1 = a + (-a-2k)+k = -k = e$, as required.
Associativity $(acirc b) circ c = (a + (b+k)) + (c + k)$.
We see everything involved is addition, which is associative, so we can remove parentheses and change order as we wish.
abstract-algebra group-theory arithmetic
abstract-algebra group-theory arithmetic
edited Mar 27 at 21:56
mathreadler
asked Mar 27 at 17:02
mathreadlermathreadler
15.4k72263
15.4k72263
3
$begingroup$
Yes, it is group. (I solved this problem as homework in uni once)
$endgroup$
– Vladislav
Mar 27 at 17:14
2
$begingroup$
How would we know if you've made a mistake when you haven't shared your work on the problem?
$endgroup$
– Shaun
Mar 27 at 17:14
1
$begingroup$
You might very well have made a mistake. We don't know what you did. Just because you got a correct result doesn't mean you didn't make a mistake.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 27 at 17:17
1
$begingroup$
Well, you have to show associativity as well....
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 27 at 17:21
2
$begingroup$
@fleablood: The question was a reasonable one. Many groups have names. (And who is this Clarence, anyway? Is he abelian, and countably infinite?)
$endgroup$
– TonyK
Mar 27 at 20:03
|
show 5 more comments
3
$begingroup$
Yes, it is group. (I solved this problem as homework in uni once)
$endgroup$
– Vladislav
Mar 27 at 17:14
2
$begingroup$
How would we know if you've made a mistake when you haven't shared your work on the problem?
$endgroup$
– Shaun
Mar 27 at 17:14
1
$begingroup$
You might very well have made a mistake. We don't know what you did. Just because you got a correct result doesn't mean you didn't make a mistake.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 27 at 17:17
1
$begingroup$
Well, you have to show associativity as well....
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 27 at 17:21
2
$begingroup$
@fleablood: The question was a reasonable one. Many groups have names. (And who is this Clarence, anyway? Is he abelian, and countably infinite?)
$endgroup$
– TonyK
Mar 27 at 20:03
3
3
$begingroup$
Yes, it is group. (I solved this problem as homework in uni once)
$endgroup$
– Vladislav
Mar 27 at 17:14
$begingroup$
Yes, it is group. (I solved this problem as homework in uni once)
$endgroup$
– Vladislav
Mar 27 at 17:14
2
2
$begingroup$
How would we know if you've made a mistake when you haven't shared your work on the problem?
$endgroup$
– Shaun
Mar 27 at 17:14
$begingroup$
How would we know if you've made a mistake when you haven't shared your work on the problem?
$endgroup$
– Shaun
Mar 27 at 17:14
1
1
$begingroup$
You might very well have made a mistake. We don't know what you did. Just because you got a correct result doesn't mean you didn't make a mistake.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 27 at 17:17
$begingroup$
You might very well have made a mistake. We don't know what you did. Just because you got a correct result doesn't mean you didn't make a mistake.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 27 at 17:17
1
1
$begingroup$
Well, you have to show associativity as well....
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 27 at 17:21
$begingroup$
Well, you have to show associativity as well....
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 27 at 17:21
2
2
$begingroup$
@fleablood: The question was a reasonable one. Many groups have names. (And who is this Clarence, anyway? Is he abelian, and countably infinite?)
$endgroup$
– TonyK
Mar 27 at 20:03
$begingroup$
@fleablood: The question was a reasonable one. Many groups have names. (And who is this Clarence, anyway? Is he abelian, and countably infinite?)
$endgroup$
– TonyK
Mar 27 at 20:03
|
show 5 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It's the group you get when you transfer the action of $(mathbb Z,+)$ to $(mathbb Z, circ)$ via the map $phi(z)= z-k$.
You can check that $phi(a+b)=phi(a)circphi(b)$ so that becomes a group isomorphism.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How can I learn which maps transfer a group to another?
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Mar 27 at 17:32
1
$begingroup$
@mathreadler Every bijection can be used to do that. There is nothing special about the bijection chosen.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Mar 27 at 19:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, your observations are correct - this is a group.
Moreover, this group is isomorphic to the infinite cyclic group $C_infty$.
To prove that you can see, that $forall a in mathbbZ, a circ (1-k) = (a+1)$, which results in $forall a in mathbbZ, a = (1 - k)^circ(a + k - 1)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for the insight. I think I understand. However I am not so used to abstract algebra I am completely confident with isomorphic and all other words.
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Mar 27 at 22:00
$begingroup$
"$forall a in mathbbZ a circ (1-k) = (a+1)$" is nigh-unreadable. Better is "$forall a in mathbbZ$, $a circ (1-k) = (a+1)$" and still better is "For all $a in mathbb Z$, $a circ (1-k) = a+1$".
$endgroup$
– Misha Lavrov
Mar 28 at 1:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose we define an operator $'$ as $a'=a-k$. Then $a'∘b'=(a-k)+(b-k)+k=a+b-k$. And $(a+b)'$ is also equal to $a+b-k$. So $a'∘b'=(a+b)'$.
And $a'$ is simply $a$ on a shifted number line. That is, if you take a number line, and treat $k$ as being the origin, then $a'$ is the distance $a$ is from $k$. Suppose you start a stopwatch at time 00:15. And suppose event A happens at 00:17, while event B happens at 00:18. If you just add the times of the two events, you get 00:35. But if you add the times on the stopwatch, you get 00:02+00:03=00:05. $∘$ would then represent adding the times on the stopwatch, with $k$=00:15.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yep. Shifted number line is actually what first made me think of it. Coming from engineering background I know from before that geometric things such as rotations and translations in plane can be groups so surely something like this should be possible also on number line which in some sense must be less complicated.
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Mar 27 at 22:28
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3164781%2finteger-addition-constant-is-it-a-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It's the group you get when you transfer the action of $(mathbb Z,+)$ to $(mathbb Z, circ)$ via the map $phi(z)= z-k$.
You can check that $phi(a+b)=phi(a)circphi(b)$ so that becomes a group isomorphism.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How can I learn which maps transfer a group to another?
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Mar 27 at 17:32
1
$begingroup$
@mathreadler Every bijection can be used to do that. There is nothing special about the bijection chosen.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Mar 27 at 19:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's the group you get when you transfer the action of $(mathbb Z,+)$ to $(mathbb Z, circ)$ via the map $phi(z)= z-k$.
You can check that $phi(a+b)=phi(a)circphi(b)$ so that becomes a group isomorphism.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
How can I learn which maps transfer a group to another?
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Mar 27 at 17:32
1
$begingroup$
@mathreadler Every bijection can be used to do that. There is nothing special about the bijection chosen.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Mar 27 at 19:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's the group you get when you transfer the action of $(mathbb Z,+)$ to $(mathbb Z, circ)$ via the map $phi(z)= z-k$.
You can check that $phi(a+b)=phi(a)circphi(b)$ so that becomes a group isomorphism.
$endgroup$
It's the group you get when you transfer the action of $(mathbb Z,+)$ to $(mathbb Z, circ)$ via the map $phi(z)= z-k$.
You can check that $phi(a+b)=phi(a)circphi(b)$ so that becomes a group isomorphism.
answered Mar 27 at 17:27
rschwiebrschwieb
107k12103252
107k12103252
$begingroup$
How can I learn which maps transfer a group to another?
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Mar 27 at 17:32
1
$begingroup$
@mathreadler Every bijection can be used to do that. There is nothing special about the bijection chosen.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Mar 27 at 19:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How can I learn which maps transfer a group to another?
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Mar 27 at 17:32
1
$begingroup$
@mathreadler Every bijection can be used to do that. There is nothing special about the bijection chosen.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Mar 27 at 19:28
$begingroup$
How can I learn which maps transfer a group to another?
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Mar 27 at 17:32
$begingroup$
How can I learn which maps transfer a group to another?
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Mar 27 at 17:32
1
1
$begingroup$
@mathreadler Every bijection can be used to do that. There is nothing special about the bijection chosen.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Mar 27 at 19:28
$begingroup$
@mathreadler Every bijection can be used to do that. There is nothing special about the bijection chosen.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Mar 27 at 19:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, your observations are correct - this is a group.
Moreover, this group is isomorphic to the infinite cyclic group $C_infty$.
To prove that you can see, that $forall a in mathbbZ, a circ (1-k) = (a+1)$, which results in $forall a in mathbbZ, a = (1 - k)^circ(a + k - 1)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for the insight. I think I understand. However I am not so used to abstract algebra I am completely confident with isomorphic and all other words.
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Mar 27 at 22:00
$begingroup$
"$forall a in mathbbZ a circ (1-k) = (a+1)$" is nigh-unreadable. Better is "$forall a in mathbbZ$, $a circ (1-k) = (a+1)$" and still better is "For all $a in mathbb Z$, $a circ (1-k) = a+1$".
$endgroup$
– Misha Lavrov
Mar 28 at 1:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, your observations are correct - this is a group.
Moreover, this group is isomorphic to the infinite cyclic group $C_infty$.
To prove that you can see, that $forall a in mathbbZ, a circ (1-k) = (a+1)$, which results in $forall a in mathbbZ, a = (1 - k)^circ(a + k - 1)$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you for the insight. I think I understand. However I am not so used to abstract algebra I am completely confident with isomorphic and all other words.
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Mar 27 at 22:00
$begingroup$
"$forall a in mathbbZ a circ (1-k) = (a+1)$" is nigh-unreadable. Better is "$forall a in mathbbZ$, $a circ (1-k) = (a+1)$" and still better is "For all $a in mathbb Z$, $a circ (1-k) = a+1$".
$endgroup$
– Misha Lavrov
Mar 28 at 1:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, your observations are correct - this is a group.
Moreover, this group is isomorphic to the infinite cyclic group $C_infty$.
To prove that you can see, that $forall a in mathbbZ, a circ (1-k) = (a+1)$, which results in $forall a in mathbbZ, a = (1 - k)^circ(a + k - 1)$.
$endgroup$
Yes, your observations are correct - this is a group.
Moreover, this group is isomorphic to the infinite cyclic group $C_infty$.
To prove that you can see, that $forall a in mathbbZ, a circ (1-k) = (a+1)$, which results in $forall a in mathbbZ, a = (1 - k)^circ(a + k - 1)$.
edited Mar 28 at 7:08
answered Mar 27 at 17:26
Yanior WegYanior Weg
2,72711446
2,72711446
$begingroup$
Thank you for the insight. I think I understand. However I am not so used to abstract algebra I am completely confident with isomorphic and all other words.
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Mar 27 at 22:00
$begingroup$
"$forall a in mathbbZ a circ (1-k) = (a+1)$" is nigh-unreadable. Better is "$forall a in mathbbZ$, $a circ (1-k) = (a+1)$" and still better is "For all $a in mathbb Z$, $a circ (1-k) = a+1$".
$endgroup$
– Misha Lavrov
Mar 28 at 1:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you for the insight. I think I understand. However I am not so used to abstract algebra I am completely confident with isomorphic and all other words.
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Mar 27 at 22:00
$begingroup$
"$forall a in mathbbZ a circ (1-k) = (a+1)$" is nigh-unreadable. Better is "$forall a in mathbbZ$, $a circ (1-k) = (a+1)$" and still better is "For all $a in mathbb Z$, $a circ (1-k) = a+1$".
$endgroup$
– Misha Lavrov
Mar 28 at 1:55
$begingroup$
Thank you for the insight. I think I understand. However I am not so used to abstract algebra I am completely confident with isomorphic and all other words.
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Mar 27 at 22:00
$begingroup$
Thank you for the insight. I think I understand. However I am not so used to abstract algebra I am completely confident with isomorphic and all other words.
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Mar 27 at 22:00
$begingroup$
"$forall a in mathbbZ a circ (1-k) = (a+1)$" is nigh-unreadable. Better is "$forall a in mathbbZ$, $a circ (1-k) = (a+1)$" and still better is "For all $a in mathbb Z$, $a circ (1-k) = a+1$".
$endgroup$
– Misha Lavrov
Mar 28 at 1:55
$begingroup$
"$forall a in mathbbZ a circ (1-k) = (a+1)$" is nigh-unreadable. Better is "$forall a in mathbbZ$, $a circ (1-k) = (a+1)$" and still better is "For all $a in mathbb Z$, $a circ (1-k) = a+1$".
$endgroup$
– Misha Lavrov
Mar 28 at 1:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose we define an operator $'$ as $a'=a-k$. Then $a'∘b'=(a-k)+(b-k)+k=a+b-k$. And $(a+b)'$ is also equal to $a+b-k$. So $a'∘b'=(a+b)'$.
And $a'$ is simply $a$ on a shifted number line. That is, if you take a number line, and treat $k$ as being the origin, then $a'$ is the distance $a$ is from $k$. Suppose you start a stopwatch at time 00:15. And suppose event A happens at 00:17, while event B happens at 00:18. If you just add the times of the two events, you get 00:35. But if you add the times on the stopwatch, you get 00:02+00:03=00:05. $∘$ would then represent adding the times on the stopwatch, with $k$=00:15.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yep. Shifted number line is actually what first made me think of it. Coming from engineering background I know from before that geometric things such as rotations and translations in plane can be groups so surely something like this should be possible also on number line which in some sense must be less complicated.
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Mar 27 at 22:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose we define an operator $'$ as $a'=a-k$. Then $a'∘b'=(a-k)+(b-k)+k=a+b-k$. And $(a+b)'$ is also equal to $a+b-k$. So $a'∘b'=(a+b)'$.
And $a'$ is simply $a$ on a shifted number line. That is, if you take a number line, and treat $k$ as being the origin, then $a'$ is the distance $a$ is from $k$. Suppose you start a stopwatch at time 00:15. And suppose event A happens at 00:17, while event B happens at 00:18. If you just add the times of the two events, you get 00:35. But if you add the times on the stopwatch, you get 00:02+00:03=00:05. $∘$ would then represent adding the times on the stopwatch, with $k$=00:15.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yep. Shifted number line is actually what first made me think of it. Coming from engineering background I know from before that geometric things such as rotations and translations in plane can be groups so surely something like this should be possible also on number line which in some sense must be less complicated.
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Mar 27 at 22:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Suppose we define an operator $'$ as $a'=a-k$. Then $a'∘b'=(a-k)+(b-k)+k=a+b-k$. And $(a+b)'$ is also equal to $a+b-k$. So $a'∘b'=(a+b)'$.
And $a'$ is simply $a$ on a shifted number line. That is, if you take a number line, and treat $k$ as being the origin, then $a'$ is the distance $a$ is from $k$. Suppose you start a stopwatch at time 00:15. And suppose event A happens at 00:17, while event B happens at 00:18. If you just add the times of the two events, you get 00:35. But if you add the times on the stopwatch, you get 00:02+00:03=00:05. $∘$ would then represent adding the times on the stopwatch, with $k$=00:15.
$endgroup$
Suppose we define an operator $'$ as $a'=a-k$. Then $a'∘b'=(a-k)+(b-k)+k=a+b-k$. And $(a+b)'$ is also equal to $a+b-k$. So $a'∘b'=(a+b)'$.
And $a'$ is simply $a$ on a shifted number line. That is, if you take a number line, and treat $k$ as being the origin, then $a'$ is the distance $a$ is from $k$. Suppose you start a stopwatch at time 00:15. And suppose event A happens at 00:17, while event B happens at 00:18. If you just add the times of the two events, you get 00:35. But if you add the times on the stopwatch, you get 00:02+00:03=00:05. $∘$ would then represent adding the times on the stopwatch, with $k$=00:15.
answered Mar 27 at 22:16
AcccumulationAcccumulation
7,2052619
7,2052619
$begingroup$
Yep. Shifted number line is actually what first made me think of it. Coming from engineering background I know from before that geometric things such as rotations and translations in plane can be groups so surely something like this should be possible also on number line which in some sense must be less complicated.
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Mar 27 at 22:28
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yep. Shifted number line is actually what first made me think of it. Coming from engineering background I know from before that geometric things such as rotations and translations in plane can be groups so surely something like this should be possible also on number line which in some sense must be less complicated.
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Mar 27 at 22:28
$begingroup$
Yep. Shifted number line is actually what first made me think of it. Coming from engineering background I know from before that geometric things such as rotations and translations in plane can be groups so surely something like this should be possible also on number line which in some sense must be less complicated.
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Mar 27 at 22:28
$begingroup$
Yep. Shifted number line is actually what first made me think of it. Coming from engineering background I know from before that geometric things such as rotations and translations in plane can be groups so surely something like this should be possible also on number line which in some sense must be less complicated.
$endgroup$
– mathreadler
Mar 27 at 22:28
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3164781%2finteger-addition-constant-is-it-a-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
Yes, it is group. (I solved this problem as homework in uni once)
$endgroup$
– Vladislav
Mar 27 at 17:14
2
$begingroup$
How would we know if you've made a mistake when you haven't shared your work on the problem?
$endgroup$
– Shaun
Mar 27 at 17:14
1
$begingroup$
You might very well have made a mistake. We don't know what you did. Just because you got a correct result doesn't mean you didn't make a mistake.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 27 at 17:17
1
$begingroup$
Well, you have to show associativity as well....
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Mar 27 at 17:21
2
$begingroup$
@fleablood: The question was a reasonable one. Many groups have names. (And who is this Clarence, anyway? Is he abelian, and countably infinite?)
$endgroup$
– TonyK
Mar 27 at 20:03