Is it convenient to ask the journal's editor for two additional days to complete a review? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InHow long is reasonable to wait for reply from an editor?How much time should one spend refereeing a paper?Should I choose the same editor for two papers?Slightly revised version of submitted paper two days afterwards: will the editor be annoyed?Referee report ignored and not sent to authorsFirstly manuscipt 'rejected' and then status changed to 'revise'Elsevier Editorial System: is this scam?Editor is asking for two referees and single columnResubmitting a Paper to a Mathematics Journal After Questionable RejectionHow is the Journal for an annual Review Chosen
How come people say “Would of”?
Is bread bad for ducks?
Is it possible for absolutely everyone to attain enlightenment?
Why couldn't they take pictures of a closer black hole?
"as much details as you can remember"
When should I buy a clipper card after flying to Oakland?
How to notate time signature switching consistently every measure
What are the motivations for publishing new editions of an existing textbook, beyond new discoveries in a field?
Did Scotland spend $250,000 for the slogan "Welcome to Scotland"?
Worn-tile Scrabble
Old scifi movie from the 50s or 60s with men in solid red uniforms who interrogate a spy from the past
Is a "Democratic" Oligarchy-Style System Possible?
Should I use my personal e-mail address, or my workplace one, when registering to external websites for work purposes?
Why don't hard Brexiteers insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?
For what reasons would an animal species NOT cross a *horizontal* land bridge?
One word riddle: Vowel in the middle
If a sorcerer casts the Banishment spell on a PC while in Avernus, does the PC return to their home plane?
Omit the same coordinate parameters in drawing line in tikz
How would you translate 「腰掛で仕事をする」
Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?
Why is the Constellation's nose gear so long?
Can there be female White Walkers?
two types of coins, decide which type it is based on 100 flips
Ubuntu Server install with full GUI
Is it convenient to ask the journal's editor for two additional days to complete a review?
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InHow long is reasonable to wait for reply from an editor?How much time should one spend refereeing a paper?Should I choose the same editor for two papers?Slightly revised version of submitted paper two days afterwards: will the editor be annoyed?Referee report ignored and not sent to authorsFirstly manuscipt 'rejected' and then status changed to 'revise'Elsevier Editorial System: is this scam?Editor is asking for two referees and single columnResubmitting a Paper to a Mathematics Journal After Questionable RejectionHow is the Journal for an annual Review Chosen
I am assigned as a reviewer of an article for IEEE TNNLS (computer science), but unfortunately, I would be super busy during the week of the deadline. In fact, I need to submit a paper and also two postdoc applications during the same week.
I'm already trying to do as much as I can before that week, but it'd make things much easier (with better quality) if I can postpone the review at least for two more days. So, I like to know if it looks unprofessional to ask the editor for that extension and whether it'd damage my review performance/reputation in that journal?
journals peer-review review-articles
edited Mar 31 at 7:54
Wrzlprmft♦
34.6k11109186
asked Mar 30 at 19:43
BabakBabak
1,5631829
add a comment |
I am assigned as a reviewer of an article for IEEE TNNLS (computer science), but unfortunately, I would be super busy during the week of the deadline. In fact, I need to submit a paper and also two postdoc applications during the same week.
I'm already trying to do as much as I can before that week, but it'd make things much easier (with better quality) if I can postpone the review at least for two more days. So, I like to know if it looks unprofessional to ask the editor for that extension and whether it'd damage my review performance/reputation in that journal?
journals peer-review review-articles
edited Mar 31 at 7:54
Wrzlprmft♦
34.6k11109186
asked Mar 30 at 19:43
BabakBabak
1,5631829
16
A two day extension is almost nothing compared to the significant work of finding a new reviewer. I would just ask (in fact I've done so multiple times). They won't put you on a blacklist for such a reasonable request.
– Roland
Mar 30 at 20:59
1
Yes, you can I have asked an editor to extend the review and he did it, there is no worries.
– Monkia
Mar 30 at 23:33
6
I never ask. I submit my reviews whenever I have time.
– Prof. Santa Claus
Mar 31 at 2:17
2
@Prof.SantaClaus I may do that when I become a professor as big as Santa is! :D
– Babak
Mar 31 at 11:11
add a comment |
I am assigned as a reviewer of an article for IEEE TNNLS (computer science), but unfortunately, I would be super busy during the week of the deadline. In fact, I need to submit a paper and also two postdoc applications during the same week.
I'm already trying to do as much as I can before that week, but it'd make things much easier (with better quality) if I can postpone the review at least for two more days. So, I like to know if it looks unprofessional to ask the editor for that extension and whether it'd damage my review performance/reputation in that journal?
journals peer-review review-articles
edited Mar 31 at 7:54
Wrzlprmft♦
34.6k11109186
asked Mar 30 at 19:43
BabakBabak
1,5631829
I am assigned as a reviewer of an article for IEEE TNNLS (computer science), but unfortunately, I would be super busy during the week of the deadline. In fact, I need to submit a paper and also two postdoc applications during the same week.
I'm already trying to do as much as I can before that week, but it'd make things much easier (with better quality) if I can postpone the review at least for two more days. So, I like to know if it looks unprofessional to ask the editor for that extension and whether it'd damage my review performance/reputation in that journal?
journals peer-review review-articles
journals peer-review review-articles
edited Mar 31 at 7:54
Wrzlprmft♦
34.6k11109186
asked Mar 30 at 19:43
BabakBabak
1,5631829
edited Mar 31 at 7:54
Wrzlprmft♦
34.6k11109186
asked Mar 30 at 19:43
BabakBabak
1,5631829
edited Mar 31 at 7:54
Wrzlprmft♦
34.6k11109186
edited Mar 31 at 7:54
Wrzlprmft♦
34.6k11109186
edited Mar 31 at 7:54
Wrzlprmft♦
34.6k11109186
34.6k11109186
asked Mar 30 at 19:43
BabakBabak
1,5631829
asked Mar 30 at 19:43
BabakBabak
1,5631829
asked Mar 30 at 19:43
BabakBabak
1,5631829
1,5631829
16
A two day extension is almost nothing compared to the significant work of finding a new reviewer. I would just ask (in fact I've done so multiple times). They won't put you on a blacklist for such a reasonable request.
– Roland
Mar 30 at 20:59
1
Yes, you can I have asked an editor to extend the review and he did it, there is no worries.
– Monkia
Mar 30 at 23:33
6
I never ask. I submit my reviews whenever I have time.
– Prof. Santa Claus
Mar 31 at 2:17
2
@Prof.SantaClaus I may do that when I become a professor as big as Santa is! :D
– Babak
Mar 31 at 11:11
add a comment |
16
A two day extension is almost nothing compared to the significant work of finding a new reviewer. I would just ask (in fact I've done so multiple times). They won't put you on a blacklist for such a reasonable request.
– Roland
Mar 30 at 20:59
1
Yes, you can I have asked an editor to extend the review and he did it, there is no worries.
– Monkia
Mar 30 at 23:33
6
I never ask. I submit my reviews whenever I have time.
– Prof. Santa Claus
Mar 31 at 2:17
2
@Prof.SantaClaus I may do that when I become a professor as big as Santa is! :D
– Babak
Mar 31 at 11:11
16
16
A two day extension is almost nothing compared to the significant work of finding a new reviewer. I would just ask (in fact I've done so multiple times). They won't put you on a blacklist for such a reasonable request.
– Roland
Mar 30 at 20:59
A two day extension is almost nothing compared to the significant work of finding a new reviewer. I would just ask (in fact I've done so multiple times). They won't put you on a blacklist for such a reasonable request.
– Roland
Mar 30 at 20:59
1
1
Yes, you can I have asked an editor to extend the review and he did it, there is no worries.
– Monkia
Mar 30 at 23:33
Yes, you can I have asked an editor to extend the review and he did it, there is no worries.
– Monkia
Mar 30 at 23:33
6
6
I never ask. I submit my reviews whenever I have time.
– Prof. Santa Claus
Mar 31 at 2:17
I never ask. I submit my reviews whenever I have time.
– Prof. Santa Claus
Mar 31 at 2:17
2
2
@Prof.SantaClaus I may do that when I become a professor as big as Santa is! :D
– Babak
Mar 31 at 11:11
@Prof.SantaClaus I may do that when I become a professor as big as Santa is! :D
– Babak
Mar 31 at 11:11
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Getting a review in two days late for a journal article is pretty common. I wouldn't worry about anything less than being a week late. For conferences, deadlines can be tighter, but 2 days is nothing. Ideally you would let the editor know your review will be a couple of days late, but even if you didn't, it is not the end of the world.
answered Mar 30 at 22:41
StrongBad♦StrongBad
86.9k24217426
add a comment |
I wouldn't even ask. Just "tell".
Send a short email saying you will send the review a week later (more time than needed, don't want to come back in 2 days again). Don't phrase the email in a manner that requires a response from the editor--tell, don't ask (cut the back and forth chatter).
If the editor wants/needs to pull the paper, he will do so. But it's very unlikely he will. But just let him do what he does.
In addition, I would be practical and do a simple review. I love doing extensive murder board reviews. But you need to concentrate on your own stuff. There is probably an 80-20 rule where you can give 80% of the key improvements with 20% of the text and parsing time. In particular, if you are recommending rejection, I would be economical with your time and not investment much in improvement recommendations.
answered Mar 30 at 23:06
guestguest
1211
14
"Ask" will be interpreted as "tell" and is far more polite.
– Bob Brown
Mar 31 at 2:14
@BobBrown: I don't mind asking, but should I also apologize for the inconvenience? ;)
– Babak
Mar 31 at 2:27
1
@Babak - You can add that sentence in the same formally-ask, but in-reality-tell email. But that's just a politeness gesture. In reality, there is nothing in here to feel apologetic for. :)
– 299792458
Mar 31 at 5:35
@Babak If you like, but don't make a big deal of it. You are still "telling," after all. The point is to do so politely.
– Bob Brown
Mar 31 at 13:14
add a comment |
When I ask for an extension, I usually ask for a substantial one, i.e. one week not just 2 days. This way, if I need more than 2 days for some unforeseen reason I don’t have to ask for another extension. Moreover if the editor is really tight she/he can negotiate down to 2 days and everybody is happy.
Dear editor,
Due to unforeseen circumstances I can only guarantee submission of my report by[deadline+1 week]. I trust this firm new submission date is acceptable to the Journal.
answered Mar 31 at 19:50
ZeroTheHeroZeroTheHero
1,577113
2
As an editor, I want people to ask for only what they need.
– jakebeal
Mar 31 at 20:10
1
@jakebeal so do I but I would rather not deal with people asking for a 2-day extension every 2nd day: I'm more interested in a firm deadline than a moving one.
– ZeroTheHero
Mar 31 at 21:00
@jakebeal People know only a subjective probability distribution of the time they need, not a specific value. Which quantile (or other statistic) do you want them to ask? It seems reasonable that if someone expects the review to take 2 days on average, there's still a 1/5 chance that it will take 1 week, and in that case the editor might like them to ask for the week directly.
– JiK
Apr 1 at 9:23
@jakebeal I was also advised, and now practice, asking for approximately max(3days, X*30%) more extra time, rounded to the nearest week, if I estimated I needed X time to finish, to give myself a small buffer and avoid asking twice. So two days are likely to become a week, a week 10 days, and 3 months (very extensive revision, happened once) 4 months. I will, if I can, submit sooner, but I'll also be very happy if I realize I underestimated and can now actually still finish at a reasonable pace rather than forgoing sleep for the last 3 days before the submission.
– penelope
Apr 1 at 13:14
@ZeroTheHero Actually, I'd still prefer to have somebody give me their honest estimate and then bug them again if they don't deliver. At least I know I've got their attention, rather than being shuffled into the "don't have to think about it this week" pile, which is likely to lead to asking for another week the next week.
– jakebeal
Apr 1 at 14:32
|
show 1 more comment
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "415"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f127299%2fis-it-convenient-to-ask-the-journals-editor-for-two-additional-days-to-complete%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Getting a review in two days late for a journal article is pretty common. I wouldn't worry about anything less than being a week late. For conferences, deadlines can be tighter, but 2 days is nothing. Ideally you would let the editor know your review will be a couple of days late, but even if you didn't, it is not the end of the world.
answered Mar 30 at 22:41
StrongBad♦StrongBad
86.9k24217426
add a comment |
Getting a review in two days late for a journal article is pretty common. I wouldn't worry about anything less than being a week late. For conferences, deadlines can be tighter, but 2 days is nothing. Ideally you would let the editor know your review will be a couple of days late, but even if you didn't, it is not the end of the world.
answered Mar 30 at 22:41
StrongBad♦StrongBad
86.9k24217426
add a comment |
Getting a review in two days late for a journal article is pretty common. I wouldn't worry about anything less than being a week late. For conferences, deadlines can be tighter, but 2 days is nothing. Ideally you would let the editor know your review will be a couple of days late, but even if you didn't, it is not the end of the world.
answered Mar 30 at 22:41
StrongBad♦StrongBad
86.9k24217426
Getting a review in two days late for a journal article is pretty common. I wouldn't worry about anything less than being a week late. For conferences, deadlines can be tighter, but 2 days is nothing. Ideally you would let the editor know your review will be a couple of days late, but even if you didn't, it is not the end of the world.
answered Mar 30 at 22:41
StrongBad♦StrongBad
86.9k24217426
answered Mar 30 at 22:41
StrongBad♦StrongBad
86.9k24217426
answered Mar 30 at 22:41
StrongBad♦StrongBad
86.9k24217426
answered Mar 30 at 22:41
StrongBad♦StrongBad
86.9k24217426
86.9k24217426
add a comment |
add a comment |
I wouldn't even ask. Just "tell".
Send a short email saying you will send the review a week later (more time than needed, don't want to come back in 2 days again). Don't phrase the email in a manner that requires a response from the editor--tell, don't ask (cut the back and forth chatter).
If the editor wants/needs to pull the paper, he will do so. But it's very unlikely he will. But just let him do what he does.
In addition, I would be practical and do a simple review. I love doing extensive murder board reviews. But you need to concentrate on your own stuff. There is probably an 80-20 rule where you can give 80% of the key improvements with 20% of the text and parsing time. In particular, if you are recommending rejection, I would be economical with your time and not investment much in improvement recommendations.
answered Mar 30 at 23:06
guestguest
1211
14
"Ask" will be interpreted as "tell" and is far more polite.
– Bob Brown
Mar 31 at 2:14
@BobBrown: I don't mind asking, but should I also apologize for the inconvenience? ;)
– Babak
Mar 31 at 2:27
1
@Babak - You can add that sentence in the same formally-ask, but in-reality-tell email. But that's just a politeness gesture. In reality, there is nothing in here to feel apologetic for. :)
– 299792458
Mar 31 at 5:35
@Babak If you like, but don't make a big deal of it. You are still "telling," after all. The point is to do so politely.
– Bob Brown
Mar 31 at 13:14
add a comment |
I wouldn't even ask. Just "tell".
Send a short email saying you will send the review a week later (more time than needed, don't want to come back in 2 days again). Don't phrase the email in a manner that requires a response from the editor--tell, don't ask (cut the back and forth chatter).
If the editor wants/needs to pull the paper, he will do so. But it's very unlikely he will. But just let him do what he does.
In addition, I would be practical and do a simple review. I love doing extensive murder board reviews. But you need to concentrate on your own stuff. There is probably an 80-20 rule where you can give 80% of the key improvements with 20% of the text and parsing time. In particular, if you are recommending rejection, I would be economical with your time and not investment much in improvement recommendations.
answered Mar 30 at 23:06
guestguest
1211
14
"Ask" will be interpreted as "tell" and is far more polite.
– Bob Brown
Mar 31 at 2:14
@BobBrown: I don't mind asking, but should I also apologize for the inconvenience? ;)
– Babak
Mar 31 at 2:27
1
@Babak - You can add that sentence in the same formally-ask, but in-reality-tell email. But that's just a politeness gesture. In reality, there is nothing in here to feel apologetic for. :)
– 299792458
Mar 31 at 5:35
@Babak If you like, but don't make a big deal of it. You are still "telling," after all. The point is to do so politely.
– Bob Brown
Mar 31 at 13:14
add a comment |
I wouldn't even ask. Just "tell".
Send a short email saying you will send the review a week later (more time than needed, don't want to come back in 2 days again). Don't phrase the email in a manner that requires a response from the editor--tell, don't ask (cut the back and forth chatter).
If the editor wants/needs to pull the paper, he will do so. But it's very unlikely he will. But just let him do what he does.
In addition, I would be practical and do a simple review. I love doing extensive murder board reviews. But you need to concentrate on your own stuff. There is probably an 80-20 rule where you can give 80% of the key improvements with 20% of the text and parsing time. In particular, if you are recommending rejection, I would be economical with your time and not investment much in improvement recommendations.
answered Mar 30 at 23:06
guestguest
1211
I wouldn't even ask. Just "tell".
Send a short email saying you will send the review a week later (more time than needed, don't want to come back in 2 days again). Don't phrase the email in a manner that requires a response from the editor--tell, don't ask (cut the back and forth chatter).
If the editor wants/needs to pull the paper, he will do so. But it's very unlikely he will. But just let him do what he does.
In addition, I would be practical and do a simple review. I love doing extensive murder board reviews. But you need to concentrate on your own stuff. There is probably an 80-20 rule where you can give 80% of the key improvements with 20% of the text and parsing time. In particular, if you are recommending rejection, I would be economical with your time and not investment much in improvement recommendations.
answered Mar 30 at 23:06
guestguest
1211
answered Mar 30 at 23:06
guestguest
1211
answered Mar 30 at 23:06
guestguest
1211
answered Mar 30 at 23:06
guestguest
1211
1211
14
"Ask" will be interpreted as "tell" and is far more polite.
– Bob Brown
Mar 31 at 2:14
@BobBrown: I don't mind asking, but should I also apologize for the inconvenience? ;)
– Babak
Mar 31 at 2:27
1
@Babak - You can add that sentence in the same formally-ask, but in-reality-tell email. But that's just a politeness gesture. In reality, there is nothing in here to feel apologetic for. :)
– 299792458
Mar 31 at 5:35
@Babak If you like, but don't make a big deal of it. You are still "telling," after all. The point is to do so politely.
– Bob Brown
Mar 31 at 13:14
add a comment |
14
"Ask" will be interpreted as "tell" and is far more polite.
– Bob Brown
Mar 31 at 2:14
@BobBrown: I don't mind asking, but should I also apologize for the inconvenience? ;)
– Babak
Mar 31 at 2:27
1
@Babak - You can add that sentence in the same formally-ask, but in-reality-tell email. But that's just a politeness gesture. In reality, there is nothing in here to feel apologetic for. :)
– 299792458
Mar 31 at 5:35
@Babak If you like, but don't make a big deal of it. You are still "telling," after all. The point is to do so politely.
– Bob Brown
Mar 31 at 13:14
14
14
"Ask" will be interpreted as "tell" and is far more polite.
– Bob Brown
Mar 31 at 2:14
"Ask" will be interpreted as "tell" and is far more polite.
– Bob Brown
Mar 31 at 2:14
@BobBrown: I don't mind asking, but should I also apologize for the inconvenience? ;)
– Babak
Mar 31 at 2:27
@BobBrown: I don't mind asking, but should I also apologize for the inconvenience? ;)
– Babak
Mar 31 at 2:27
1
1
@Babak - You can add that sentence in the same formally-ask, but in-reality-tell email. But that's just a politeness gesture. In reality, there is nothing in here to feel apologetic for. :)
– 299792458
Mar 31 at 5:35
@Babak - You can add that sentence in the same formally-ask, but in-reality-tell email. But that's just a politeness gesture. In reality, there is nothing in here to feel apologetic for. :)
– 299792458
Mar 31 at 5:35
@Babak If you like, but don't make a big deal of it. You are still "telling," after all. The point is to do so politely.
– Bob Brown
Mar 31 at 13:14
@Babak If you like, but don't make a big deal of it. You are still "telling," after all. The point is to do so politely.
– Bob Brown
Mar 31 at 13:14
add a comment |
When I ask for an extension, I usually ask for a substantial one, i.e. one week not just 2 days. This way, if I need more than 2 days for some unforeseen reason I don’t have to ask for another extension. Moreover if the editor is really tight she/he can negotiate down to 2 days and everybody is happy.
Dear editor,
Due to unforeseen circumstances I can only guarantee submission of my report by[deadline+1 week]. I trust this firm new submission date is acceptable to the Journal.
answered Mar 31 at 19:50
ZeroTheHeroZeroTheHero
1,577113
2
As an editor, I want people to ask for only what they need.
– jakebeal
Mar 31 at 20:10
1
@jakebeal so do I but I would rather not deal with people asking for a 2-day extension every 2nd day: I'm more interested in a firm deadline than a moving one.
– ZeroTheHero
Mar 31 at 21:00
@jakebeal People know only a subjective probability distribution of the time they need, not a specific value. Which quantile (or other statistic) do you want them to ask? It seems reasonable that if someone expects the review to take 2 days on average, there's still a 1/5 chance that it will take 1 week, and in that case the editor might like them to ask for the week directly.
– JiK
Apr 1 at 9:23
@jakebeal I was also advised, and now practice, asking for approximately max(3days, X*30%) more extra time, rounded to the nearest week, if I estimated I needed X time to finish, to give myself a small buffer and avoid asking twice. So two days are likely to become a week, a week 10 days, and 3 months (very extensive revision, happened once) 4 months. I will, if I can, submit sooner, but I'll also be very happy if I realize I underestimated and can now actually still finish at a reasonable pace rather than forgoing sleep for the last 3 days before the submission.
– penelope
Apr 1 at 13:14
@ZeroTheHero Actually, I'd still prefer to have somebody give me their honest estimate and then bug them again if they don't deliver. At least I know I've got their attention, rather than being shuffled into the "don't have to think about it this week" pile, which is likely to lead to asking for another week the next week.
– jakebeal
Apr 1 at 14:32
|
show 1 more comment
When I ask for an extension, I usually ask for a substantial one, i.e. one week not just 2 days. This way, if I need more than 2 days for some unforeseen reason I don’t have to ask for another extension. Moreover if the editor is really tight she/he can negotiate down to 2 days and everybody is happy.
Dear editor,
Due to unforeseen circumstances I can only guarantee submission of my report by[deadline+1 week]. I trust this firm new submission date is acceptable to the Journal.
answered Mar 31 at 19:50
ZeroTheHeroZeroTheHero
1,577113
2
As an editor, I want people to ask for only what they need.
– jakebeal
Mar 31 at 20:10
1
@jakebeal so do I but I would rather not deal with people asking for a 2-day extension every 2nd day: I'm more interested in a firm deadline than a moving one.
– ZeroTheHero
Mar 31 at 21:00
@jakebeal People know only a subjective probability distribution of the time they need, not a specific value. Which quantile (or other statistic) do you want them to ask? It seems reasonable that if someone expects the review to take 2 days on average, there's still a 1/5 chance that it will take 1 week, and in that case the editor might like them to ask for the week directly.
– JiK
Apr 1 at 9:23
@jakebeal I was also advised, and now practice, asking for approximately max(3days, X*30%) more extra time, rounded to the nearest week, if I estimated I needed X time to finish, to give myself a small buffer and avoid asking twice. So two days are likely to become a week, a week 10 days, and 3 months (very extensive revision, happened once) 4 months. I will, if I can, submit sooner, but I'll also be very happy if I realize I underestimated and can now actually still finish at a reasonable pace rather than forgoing sleep for the last 3 days before the submission.
– penelope
Apr 1 at 13:14
@ZeroTheHero Actually, I'd still prefer to have somebody give me their honest estimate and then bug them again if they don't deliver. At least I know I've got their attention, rather than being shuffled into the "don't have to think about it this week" pile, which is likely to lead to asking for another week the next week.
– jakebeal
Apr 1 at 14:32
|
show 1 more comment
When I ask for an extension, I usually ask for a substantial one, i.e. one week not just 2 days. This way, if I need more than 2 days for some unforeseen reason I don’t have to ask for another extension. Moreover if the editor is really tight she/he can negotiate down to 2 days and everybody is happy.
Dear editor,
Due to unforeseen circumstances I can only guarantee submission of my report by[deadline+1 week]. I trust this firm new submission date is acceptable to the Journal.
answered Mar 31 at 19:50
ZeroTheHeroZeroTheHero
1,577113
When I ask for an extension, I usually ask for a substantial one, i.e. one week not just 2 days. This way, if I need more than 2 days for some unforeseen reason I don’t have to ask for another extension. Moreover if the editor is really tight she/he can negotiate down to 2 days and everybody is happy.
Dear editor,
Due to unforeseen circumstances I can only guarantee submission of my report by[deadline+1 week]. I trust this firm new submission date is acceptable to the Journal.
answered Mar 31 at 19:50
ZeroTheHeroZeroTheHero
1,577113
answered Mar 31 at 19:50
ZeroTheHeroZeroTheHero
1,577113
answered Mar 31 at 19:50
ZeroTheHeroZeroTheHero
1,577113
answered Mar 31 at 19:50
ZeroTheHeroZeroTheHero
1,577113
1,577113
2
As an editor, I want people to ask for only what they need.
– jakebeal
Mar 31 at 20:10
1
@jakebeal so do I but I would rather not deal with people asking for a 2-day extension every 2nd day: I'm more interested in a firm deadline than a moving one.
– ZeroTheHero
Mar 31 at 21:00
@jakebeal People know only a subjective probability distribution of the time they need, not a specific value. Which quantile (or other statistic) do you want them to ask? It seems reasonable that if someone expects the review to take 2 days on average, there's still a 1/5 chance that it will take 1 week, and in that case the editor might like them to ask for the week directly.
– JiK
Apr 1 at 9:23
@jakebeal I was also advised, and now practice, asking for approximately max(3days, X*30%) more extra time, rounded to the nearest week, if I estimated I needed X time to finish, to give myself a small buffer and avoid asking twice. So two days are likely to become a week, a week 10 days, and 3 months (very extensive revision, happened once) 4 months. I will, if I can, submit sooner, but I'll also be very happy if I realize I underestimated and can now actually still finish at a reasonable pace rather than forgoing sleep for the last 3 days before the submission.
– penelope
Apr 1 at 13:14
@ZeroTheHero Actually, I'd still prefer to have somebody give me their honest estimate and then bug them again if they don't deliver. At least I know I've got their attention, rather than being shuffled into the "don't have to think about it this week" pile, which is likely to lead to asking for another week the next week.
– jakebeal
Apr 1 at 14:32
|
show 1 more comment
2
As an editor, I want people to ask for only what they need.
– jakebeal
Mar 31 at 20:10
1
@jakebeal so do I but I would rather not deal with people asking for a 2-day extension every 2nd day: I'm more interested in a firm deadline than a moving one.
– ZeroTheHero
Mar 31 at 21:00
@jakebeal People know only a subjective probability distribution of the time they need, not a specific value. Which quantile (or other statistic) do you want them to ask? It seems reasonable that if someone expects the review to take 2 days on average, there's still a 1/5 chance that it will take 1 week, and in that case the editor might like them to ask for the week directly.
– JiK
Apr 1 at 9:23
@jakebeal I was also advised, and now practice, asking for approximately max(3days, X*30%) more extra time, rounded to the nearest week, if I estimated I needed X time to finish, to give myself a small buffer and avoid asking twice. So two days are likely to become a week, a week 10 days, and 3 months (very extensive revision, happened once) 4 months. I will, if I can, submit sooner, but I'll also be very happy if I realize I underestimated and can now actually still finish at a reasonable pace rather than forgoing sleep for the last 3 days before the submission.
– penelope
Apr 1 at 13:14
@ZeroTheHero Actually, I'd still prefer to have somebody give me their honest estimate and then bug them again if they don't deliver. At least I know I've got their attention, rather than being shuffled into the "don't have to think about it this week" pile, which is likely to lead to asking for another week the next week.
– jakebeal
Apr 1 at 14:32
2
2
As an editor, I want people to ask for only what they need.
– jakebeal
Mar 31 at 20:10
As an editor, I want people to ask for only what they need.
– jakebeal
Mar 31 at 20:10
1
1
@jakebeal so do I but I would rather not deal with people asking for a 2-day extension every 2nd day: I'm more interested in a firm deadline than a moving one.
– ZeroTheHero
Mar 31 at 21:00
@jakebeal so do I but I would rather not deal with people asking for a 2-day extension every 2nd day: I'm more interested in a firm deadline than a moving one.
– ZeroTheHero
Mar 31 at 21:00
@jakebeal People know only a subjective probability distribution of the time they need, not a specific value. Which quantile (or other statistic) do you want them to ask? It seems reasonable that if someone expects the review to take 2 days on average, there's still a 1/5 chance that it will take 1 week, and in that case the editor might like them to ask for the week directly.
– JiK
Apr 1 at 9:23
@jakebeal People know only a subjective probability distribution of the time they need, not a specific value. Which quantile (or other statistic) do you want them to ask? It seems reasonable that if someone expects the review to take 2 days on average, there's still a 1/5 chance that it will take 1 week, and in that case the editor might like them to ask for the week directly.
– JiK
Apr 1 at 9:23
@jakebeal I was also advised, and now practice, asking for approximately max(3days, X*30%) more extra time, rounded to the nearest week, if I estimated I needed X time to finish, to give myself a small buffer and avoid asking twice. So two days are likely to become a week, a week 10 days, and 3 months (very extensive revision, happened once) 4 months. I will, if I can, submit sooner, but I'll also be very happy if I realize I underestimated and can now actually still finish at a reasonable pace rather than forgoing sleep for the last 3 days before the submission.
– penelope
Apr 1 at 13:14
@jakebeal I was also advised, and now practice, asking for approximately max(3days, X*30%) more extra time, rounded to the nearest week, if I estimated I needed X time to finish, to give myself a small buffer and avoid asking twice. So two days are likely to become a week, a week 10 days, and 3 months (very extensive revision, happened once) 4 months. I will, if I can, submit sooner, but I'll also be very happy if I realize I underestimated and can now actually still finish at a reasonable pace rather than forgoing sleep for the last 3 days before the submission.
– penelope
Apr 1 at 13:14
@ZeroTheHero Actually, I'd still prefer to have somebody give me their honest estimate and then bug them again if they don't deliver. At least I know I've got their attention, rather than being shuffled into the "don't have to think about it this week" pile, which is likely to lead to asking for another week the next week.
– jakebeal
Apr 1 at 14:32
@ZeroTheHero Actually, I'd still prefer to have somebody give me their honest estimate and then bug them again if they don't deliver. At least I know I've got their attention, rather than being shuffled into the "don't have to think about it this week" pile, which is likely to lead to asking for another week the next week.
– jakebeal
Apr 1 at 14:32
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f127299%2fis-it-convenient-to-ask-the-journals-editor-for-two-additional-days-to-complete%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
16
A two day extension is almost nothing compared to the significant work of finding a new reviewer. I would just ask (in fact I've done so multiple times). They won't put you on a blacklist for such a reasonable request.
– Roland
Mar 30 at 20:59
1
Yes, you can I have asked an editor to extend the review and he did it, there is no worries.
– Monkia
Mar 30 at 23:33
6
I never ask. I submit my reviews whenever I have time.
– Prof. Santa Claus
Mar 31 at 2:17
2
@Prof.SantaClaus I may do that when I become a professor as big as Santa is! :D
– Babak
Mar 31 at 11:11