Artificially increasing frequency weight of word ending characters in word buildingComplete a Hungarian stem to a real wordNon-brute force approach to finding permissible English word anagramsModel params tuningWhen to use cosine simlarity over Euclidean similarityHow to improve Naive Bayes?Alternative method for RNN backpropagation through timeData analysis of unstructured data that have non linear Key value positionDiscarding rare words when comparing texts - per text, per comparison, or per codex?Word classification (not text classification) using NLP

Turning a hard to access nut?

How can I create URL shortcuts/redirects for task/diff IDs in Phabricator?

What are substitutions for coconut in curry?

What is the term when voters “dishonestly” choose something that they do not want to choose?

Worshiping one God at a time?

Suggestions on how to spend Shaabath (constructively) alone

Do I need to consider instance restrictions when showing a language is in P?

Can other pieces capture a threatening piece and prevent a checkmate?

Why didn't Héctor fade away after this character died in the movie Coco?

HP P840 HDD RAID 5 many strange drive failures

How are passwords stolen from companies if they only store hashes?

Would it be believable to defy demographics in a story?

Word for flower that blooms and wilts in one day

I got the following comment from a reputed math journal. What does it mean?

Why are there no stars visible in cislunar space?

What does "^L" mean in C?

PTIJ What is the inyan of the Konami code in Uncle Moishy's song?

Why is there so much iron?

Does .bashrc contain syntax errors?

Loading the leaflet Map in Lightning Web Component

Can you move over difficult terrain with only 5 feet of movement?

Fewest number of steps to reach 200 using special calculator

Pronounciation of the combination "st" in spanish accents

Is it insecure to send a password in a `curl` command?



Artificially increasing frequency weight of word ending characters in word building


Complete a Hungarian stem to a real wordNon-brute force approach to finding permissible English word anagramsModel params tuningWhen to use cosine simlarity over Euclidean similarityHow to improve Naive Bayes?Alternative method for RNN backpropagation through timeData analysis of unstructured data that have non linear Key value positionDiscarding rare words when comparing texts - per text, per comparison, or per codex?Word classification (not text classification) using NLP













1












$begingroup$


I have a database of letter pair bigrams. For example:



+-----------+--------+-----------+
| first | second | frequency |
+-----------+--------+-----------+
| gs | so | 1 |
| gs | sp | 2 |
| gs | sr | 1 |
| gs | ss | 3 |
| gs | st | 7 |
| gt | th | 2 |
| gt | to | 10 |
| gu | u | 2 |
| Gu | ua | 23 |
| Gu | ud | 4 |
| gu | ue | 49 |
| Gu | ui | 27 |
| Gu | ul | 15 |
| gu | um | 4 |
+-----------+--------+-----------+


The way I am using this I chose a "first" word which will be a character pair. Then I will look at all the most likely letter to follow that. The relationship of the words is such that the second character of the first pair is always the first character of the second pair. This way I can continue the chain using the second pair. The frequency is how often I have found that pair in my dataset.



I am building words using markov chains and the above data. The base issue I am tackling is that some words can end up unrealistically long despite trying to mitigate length e.g. "Quakey Dit: Courdinning-Exanagolexer" and "Zwele Bulay orpirlastacival". The first one has a word length of 24! Side Note: I know those words are complete nonsense but sometimes something good comes of it.



The, work in progress but functioning, code I am using to build these is as follows. To keep the post length down and hopefully attention up! I am excluding my table definitions code as well as my load from json function which is just for loading my mariadb connection string.



from sqlalchemy import create_engine
from sqlalchemy.orm import Session
from random import choices
from bggdb import TitleLetterPairBigram
from toolkit import get_config

# Load configuration
config_file_name = 'config.json'
config_options = get_config(config_file_name)

# Initialize database session
sa_engine = create_engine(config_options['db_url'], pool_recycle=3600)
session = Session(bind=sa_engine)

minimum_title_length = 15
tokens = []

letter_count_threshold = 7
increase_space_percentage_factor = 0.1
letter_count_threshold_passed = 0
start_of_word_to_ignore = [" " + character for character in "("]

# Get the first letter for this title build
current_pair = choices([row.first for row in session.query(TitleLetterPairBigram.first).filter(TitleLetterPairBigram.first.like(" %")).all()])[0]
tokens.append(current_pair[1])

while True:
# Get the selection of potential letters
next_tokens = session.query(TitleLetterPairBigram).filter(TitleLetterPairBigram.first == current_pair, TitleLetterPairBigram.first.notin_(start_of_word_to_ignore)).all()

# Ensure we got a result
if len(next_tokens) > 0:
# Check the flags and metrics for skewing the freqencies in favour of different outcomes.
title_thus_far = "".join(tokens)
if len(title_thus_far[title_thus_far.rfind(" ") + 1:]) >= letter_count_threshold:
# Figure out the total frequency of all potential tokens
total_bigram_freqeuncy = sum(list(single_bigram.frequency for single_bigram in next_tokens))

# The word is getting long. Start bias towards ending the word.
letter_count_threshold_passed += 1
print("Total bigrams:", total_bigram_freqeuncy, "Bias Value:", (total_bigram_freqeuncy * increase_space_percentage_factor * letter_count_threshold_passed))
for single_bigram in next_tokens:
if single_bigram.second[0] == " ":
single_bigram.frequency = single_bigram.frequency + (total_bigram_freqeuncy * increase_space_percentage_factor * letter_count_threshold_passed)

# Build two tuples of equal elements words and weights
pairs_with_frequencies = tuple(zip(*([[t.second, t.frequency] for t in next_tokens])))

# Get the next word using markov chains
current_pair = choices(pairs_with_frequencies[0], weights=pairs_with_frequencies[1])[0]
else:
# This word is done and there is no continuation. Satisfy loop condition
break

# Add the current letter, from the pair, to the list
tokens.append(current_pair[1:])

# Check if we have finished a word. Clean flags where appropriate and see if we are done the title yet.
if current_pair[1] == " ":
# Reset any flags and counters
letter_count_threshold_passed = 0
# Check if we have exceeded the minimum title length.
if len(tokens) >= minimum_title_length:
break

print("".join(tokens))


The whole point to my question is I want an opinion of my word ending logic. The way it stand is if we get a word that is more than 7 characters that I start to bolster the frequency count of space ending pairs. For every character we add to the word that is not a space then I increase the frequency multiplier for those ending characters. This should allow for word longer than 7 characters but decrease the chance of super long ones.



I am not sure if my logic is working the way I describe. Since this is based on random choice I can't go back and try again.



I plan on expanding this logic into finding closing braces, quotes etc. in other bigram esque project I am working on.










share|improve this question







New contributor




Matt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Hopefully this is sound enough for this stack. I am going to CodeReview at some point but I am not ready yet and this question is purely about building my words with bigrams.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    I think the way I could judge the merits of my script is to run it 1000's of time and change the increase_space_percentage_factor. I should see I direct correlation of average word length decreasing as I increase the factor. Never occurred to me at first since I have been making only a few words at a time.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt
    2 days ago















1












$begingroup$


I have a database of letter pair bigrams. For example:



+-----------+--------+-----------+
| first | second | frequency |
+-----------+--------+-----------+
| gs | so | 1 |
| gs | sp | 2 |
| gs | sr | 1 |
| gs | ss | 3 |
| gs | st | 7 |
| gt | th | 2 |
| gt | to | 10 |
| gu | u | 2 |
| Gu | ua | 23 |
| Gu | ud | 4 |
| gu | ue | 49 |
| Gu | ui | 27 |
| Gu | ul | 15 |
| gu | um | 4 |
+-----------+--------+-----------+


The way I am using this I chose a "first" word which will be a character pair. Then I will look at all the most likely letter to follow that. The relationship of the words is such that the second character of the first pair is always the first character of the second pair. This way I can continue the chain using the second pair. The frequency is how often I have found that pair in my dataset.



I am building words using markov chains and the above data. The base issue I am tackling is that some words can end up unrealistically long despite trying to mitigate length e.g. "Quakey Dit: Courdinning-Exanagolexer" and "Zwele Bulay orpirlastacival". The first one has a word length of 24! Side Note: I know those words are complete nonsense but sometimes something good comes of it.



The, work in progress but functioning, code I am using to build these is as follows. To keep the post length down and hopefully attention up! I am excluding my table definitions code as well as my load from json function which is just for loading my mariadb connection string.



from sqlalchemy import create_engine
from sqlalchemy.orm import Session
from random import choices
from bggdb import TitleLetterPairBigram
from toolkit import get_config

# Load configuration
config_file_name = 'config.json'
config_options = get_config(config_file_name)

# Initialize database session
sa_engine = create_engine(config_options['db_url'], pool_recycle=3600)
session = Session(bind=sa_engine)

minimum_title_length = 15
tokens = []

letter_count_threshold = 7
increase_space_percentage_factor = 0.1
letter_count_threshold_passed = 0
start_of_word_to_ignore = [" " + character for character in "("]

# Get the first letter for this title build
current_pair = choices([row.first for row in session.query(TitleLetterPairBigram.first).filter(TitleLetterPairBigram.first.like(" %")).all()])[0]
tokens.append(current_pair[1])

while True:
# Get the selection of potential letters
next_tokens = session.query(TitleLetterPairBigram).filter(TitleLetterPairBigram.first == current_pair, TitleLetterPairBigram.first.notin_(start_of_word_to_ignore)).all()

# Ensure we got a result
if len(next_tokens) > 0:
# Check the flags and metrics for skewing the freqencies in favour of different outcomes.
title_thus_far = "".join(tokens)
if len(title_thus_far[title_thus_far.rfind(" ") + 1:]) >= letter_count_threshold:
# Figure out the total frequency of all potential tokens
total_bigram_freqeuncy = sum(list(single_bigram.frequency for single_bigram in next_tokens))

# The word is getting long. Start bias towards ending the word.
letter_count_threshold_passed += 1
print("Total bigrams:", total_bigram_freqeuncy, "Bias Value:", (total_bigram_freqeuncy * increase_space_percentage_factor * letter_count_threshold_passed))
for single_bigram in next_tokens:
if single_bigram.second[0] == " ":
single_bigram.frequency = single_bigram.frequency + (total_bigram_freqeuncy * increase_space_percentage_factor * letter_count_threshold_passed)

# Build two tuples of equal elements words and weights
pairs_with_frequencies = tuple(zip(*([[t.second, t.frequency] for t in next_tokens])))

# Get the next word using markov chains
current_pair = choices(pairs_with_frequencies[0], weights=pairs_with_frequencies[1])[0]
else:
# This word is done and there is no continuation. Satisfy loop condition
break

# Add the current letter, from the pair, to the list
tokens.append(current_pair[1:])

# Check if we have finished a word. Clean flags where appropriate and see if we are done the title yet.
if current_pair[1] == " ":
# Reset any flags and counters
letter_count_threshold_passed = 0
# Check if we have exceeded the minimum title length.
if len(tokens) >= minimum_title_length:
break

print("".join(tokens))


The whole point to my question is I want an opinion of my word ending logic. The way it stand is if we get a word that is more than 7 characters that I start to bolster the frequency count of space ending pairs. For every character we add to the word that is not a space then I increase the frequency multiplier for those ending characters. This should allow for word longer than 7 characters but decrease the chance of super long ones.



I am not sure if my logic is working the way I describe. Since this is based on random choice I can't go back and try again.



I plan on expanding this logic into finding closing braces, quotes etc. in other bigram esque project I am working on.










share|improve this question







New contributor




Matt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Hopefully this is sound enough for this stack. I am going to CodeReview at some point but I am not ready yet and this question is purely about building my words with bigrams.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    I think the way I could judge the merits of my script is to run it 1000's of time and change the increase_space_percentage_factor. I should see I direct correlation of average word length decreasing as I increase the factor. Never occurred to me at first since I have been making only a few words at a time.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt
    2 days ago













1












1








1





$begingroup$


I have a database of letter pair bigrams. For example:



+-----------+--------+-----------+
| first | second | frequency |
+-----------+--------+-----------+
| gs | so | 1 |
| gs | sp | 2 |
| gs | sr | 1 |
| gs | ss | 3 |
| gs | st | 7 |
| gt | th | 2 |
| gt | to | 10 |
| gu | u | 2 |
| Gu | ua | 23 |
| Gu | ud | 4 |
| gu | ue | 49 |
| Gu | ui | 27 |
| Gu | ul | 15 |
| gu | um | 4 |
+-----------+--------+-----------+


The way I am using this I chose a "first" word which will be a character pair. Then I will look at all the most likely letter to follow that. The relationship of the words is such that the second character of the first pair is always the first character of the second pair. This way I can continue the chain using the second pair. The frequency is how often I have found that pair in my dataset.



I am building words using markov chains and the above data. The base issue I am tackling is that some words can end up unrealistically long despite trying to mitigate length e.g. "Quakey Dit: Courdinning-Exanagolexer" and "Zwele Bulay orpirlastacival". The first one has a word length of 24! Side Note: I know those words are complete nonsense but sometimes something good comes of it.



The, work in progress but functioning, code I am using to build these is as follows. To keep the post length down and hopefully attention up! I am excluding my table definitions code as well as my load from json function which is just for loading my mariadb connection string.



from sqlalchemy import create_engine
from sqlalchemy.orm import Session
from random import choices
from bggdb import TitleLetterPairBigram
from toolkit import get_config

# Load configuration
config_file_name = 'config.json'
config_options = get_config(config_file_name)

# Initialize database session
sa_engine = create_engine(config_options['db_url'], pool_recycle=3600)
session = Session(bind=sa_engine)

minimum_title_length = 15
tokens = []

letter_count_threshold = 7
increase_space_percentage_factor = 0.1
letter_count_threshold_passed = 0
start_of_word_to_ignore = [" " + character for character in "("]

# Get the first letter for this title build
current_pair = choices([row.first for row in session.query(TitleLetterPairBigram.first).filter(TitleLetterPairBigram.first.like(" %")).all()])[0]
tokens.append(current_pair[1])

while True:
# Get the selection of potential letters
next_tokens = session.query(TitleLetterPairBigram).filter(TitleLetterPairBigram.first == current_pair, TitleLetterPairBigram.first.notin_(start_of_word_to_ignore)).all()

# Ensure we got a result
if len(next_tokens) > 0:
# Check the flags and metrics for skewing the freqencies in favour of different outcomes.
title_thus_far = "".join(tokens)
if len(title_thus_far[title_thus_far.rfind(" ") + 1:]) >= letter_count_threshold:
# Figure out the total frequency of all potential tokens
total_bigram_freqeuncy = sum(list(single_bigram.frequency for single_bigram in next_tokens))

# The word is getting long. Start bias towards ending the word.
letter_count_threshold_passed += 1
print("Total bigrams:", total_bigram_freqeuncy, "Bias Value:", (total_bigram_freqeuncy * increase_space_percentage_factor * letter_count_threshold_passed))
for single_bigram in next_tokens:
if single_bigram.second[0] == " ":
single_bigram.frequency = single_bigram.frequency + (total_bigram_freqeuncy * increase_space_percentage_factor * letter_count_threshold_passed)

# Build two tuples of equal elements words and weights
pairs_with_frequencies = tuple(zip(*([[t.second, t.frequency] for t in next_tokens])))

# Get the next word using markov chains
current_pair = choices(pairs_with_frequencies[0], weights=pairs_with_frequencies[1])[0]
else:
# This word is done and there is no continuation. Satisfy loop condition
break

# Add the current letter, from the pair, to the list
tokens.append(current_pair[1:])

# Check if we have finished a word. Clean flags where appropriate and see if we are done the title yet.
if current_pair[1] == " ":
# Reset any flags and counters
letter_count_threshold_passed = 0
# Check if we have exceeded the minimum title length.
if len(tokens) >= minimum_title_length:
break

print("".join(tokens))


The whole point to my question is I want an opinion of my word ending logic. The way it stand is if we get a word that is more than 7 characters that I start to bolster the frequency count of space ending pairs. For every character we add to the word that is not a space then I increase the frequency multiplier for those ending characters. This should allow for word longer than 7 characters but decrease the chance of super long ones.



I am not sure if my logic is working the way I describe. Since this is based on random choice I can't go back and try again.



I plan on expanding this logic into finding closing braces, quotes etc. in other bigram esque project I am working on.










share|improve this question







New contributor




Matt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




I have a database of letter pair bigrams. For example:



+-----------+--------+-----------+
| first | second | frequency |
+-----------+--------+-----------+
| gs | so | 1 |
| gs | sp | 2 |
| gs | sr | 1 |
| gs | ss | 3 |
| gs | st | 7 |
| gt | th | 2 |
| gt | to | 10 |
| gu | u | 2 |
| Gu | ua | 23 |
| Gu | ud | 4 |
| gu | ue | 49 |
| Gu | ui | 27 |
| Gu | ul | 15 |
| gu | um | 4 |
+-----------+--------+-----------+


The way I am using this I chose a "first" word which will be a character pair. Then I will look at all the most likely letter to follow that. The relationship of the words is such that the second character of the first pair is always the first character of the second pair. This way I can continue the chain using the second pair. The frequency is how often I have found that pair in my dataset.



I am building words using markov chains and the above data. The base issue I am tackling is that some words can end up unrealistically long despite trying to mitigate length e.g. "Quakey Dit: Courdinning-Exanagolexer" and "Zwele Bulay orpirlastacival". The first one has a word length of 24! Side Note: I know those words are complete nonsense but sometimes something good comes of it.



The, work in progress but functioning, code I am using to build these is as follows. To keep the post length down and hopefully attention up! I am excluding my table definitions code as well as my load from json function which is just for loading my mariadb connection string.



from sqlalchemy import create_engine
from sqlalchemy.orm import Session
from random import choices
from bggdb import TitleLetterPairBigram
from toolkit import get_config

# Load configuration
config_file_name = 'config.json'
config_options = get_config(config_file_name)

# Initialize database session
sa_engine = create_engine(config_options['db_url'], pool_recycle=3600)
session = Session(bind=sa_engine)

minimum_title_length = 15
tokens = []

letter_count_threshold = 7
increase_space_percentage_factor = 0.1
letter_count_threshold_passed = 0
start_of_word_to_ignore = [" " + character for character in "("]

# Get the first letter for this title build
current_pair = choices([row.first for row in session.query(TitleLetterPairBigram.first).filter(TitleLetterPairBigram.first.like(" %")).all()])[0]
tokens.append(current_pair[1])

while True:
# Get the selection of potential letters
next_tokens = session.query(TitleLetterPairBigram).filter(TitleLetterPairBigram.first == current_pair, TitleLetterPairBigram.first.notin_(start_of_word_to_ignore)).all()

# Ensure we got a result
if len(next_tokens) > 0:
# Check the flags and metrics for skewing the freqencies in favour of different outcomes.
title_thus_far = "".join(tokens)
if len(title_thus_far[title_thus_far.rfind(" ") + 1:]) >= letter_count_threshold:
# Figure out the total frequency of all potential tokens
total_bigram_freqeuncy = sum(list(single_bigram.frequency for single_bigram in next_tokens))

# The word is getting long. Start bias towards ending the word.
letter_count_threshold_passed += 1
print("Total bigrams:", total_bigram_freqeuncy, "Bias Value:", (total_bigram_freqeuncy * increase_space_percentage_factor * letter_count_threshold_passed))
for single_bigram in next_tokens:
if single_bigram.second[0] == " ":
single_bigram.frequency = single_bigram.frequency + (total_bigram_freqeuncy * increase_space_percentage_factor * letter_count_threshold_passed)

# Build two tuples of equal elements words and weights
pairs_with_frequencies = tuple(zip(*([[t.second, t.frequency] for t in next_tokens])))

# Get the next word using markov chains
current_pair = choices(pairs_with_frequencies[0], weights=pairs_with_frequencies[1])[0]
else:
# This word is done and there is no continuation. Satisfy loop condition
break

# Add the current letter, from the pair, to the list
tokens.append(current_pair[1:])

# Check if we have finished a word. Clean flags where appropriate and see if we are done the title yet.
if current_pair[1] == " ":
# Reset any flags and counters
letter_count_threshold_passed = 0
# Check if we have exceeded the minimum title length.
if len(tokens) >= minimum_title_length:
break

print("".join(tokens))


The whole point to my question is I want an opinion of my word ending logic. The way it stand is if we get a word that is more than 7 characters that I start to bolster the frequency count of space ending pairs. For every character we add to the word that is not a space then I increase the frequency multiplier for those ending characters. This should allow for word longer than 7 characters but decrease the chance of super long ones.



I am not sure if my logic is working the way I describe. Since this is based on random choice I can't go back and try again.



I plan on expanding this logic into finding closing braces, quotes etc. in other bigram esque project I am working on.







machine-learning python markov-process ngrams






share|improve this question







New contributor




Matt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Matt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Matt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 days ago









MattMatt

1062




1062




New contributor




Matt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Matt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Matt is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • $begingroup$
    Hopefully this is sound enough for this stack. I am going to CodeReview at some point but I am not ready yet and this question is purely about building my words with bigrams.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    I think the way I could judge the merits of my script is to run it 1000's of time and change the increase_space_percentage_factor. I should see I direct correlation of average word length decreasing as I increase the factor. Never occurred to me at first since I have been making only a few words at a time.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt
    2 days ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Hopefully this is sound enough for this stack. I am going to CodeReview at some point but I am not ready yet and this question is purely about building my words with bigrams.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    I think the way I could judge the merits of my script is to run it 1000's of time and change the increase_space_percentage_factor. I should see I direct correlation of average word length decreasing as I increase the factor. Never occurred to me at first since I have been making only a few words at a time.
    $endgroup$
    – Matt
    2 days ago















$begingroup$
Hopefully this is sound enough for this stack. I am going to CodeReview at some point but I am not ready yet and this question is purely about building my words with bigrams.
$endgroup$
– Matt
2 days ago




$begingroup$
Hopefully this is sound enough for this stack. I am going to CodeReview at some point but I am not ready yet and this question is purely about building my words with bigrams.
$endgroup$
– Matt
2 days ago












$begingroup$
I think the way I could judge the merits of my script is to run it 1000's of time and change the increase_space_percentage_factor. I should see I direct correlation of average word length decreasing as I increase the factor. Never occurred to me at first since I have been making only a few words at a time.
$endgroup$
– Matt
2 days ago




$begingroup$
I think the way I could judge the merits of my script is to run it 1000's of time and change the increase_space_percentage_factor. I should see I direct correlation of average word length decreasing as I increase the factor. Never occurred to me at first since I have been making only a few words at a time.
$endgroup$
– Matt
2 days ago










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "557"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






Matt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f47384%2fartificially-increasing-frequency-weight-of-word-ending-characters-in-word-build%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








Matt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















Matt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Matt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











Matt is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f47384%2fartificially-increasing-frequency-weight-of-word-ending-characters-in-word-build%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Adding axes to figuresAdding axes labels to LaTeX figuresLaTeX equivalent of ConTeXt buffersRotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?adding axes to shapesAlign axes across subfiguresAdding figures with a certain orderLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themAdding axes labels to LaTeX figures

Tähtien Talli Jäsenet | Lähteet | NavigointivalikkoSuomen Hippos – Tähtien Talli

Do these cracks on my tires look bad? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowDry rot tire should I replace?Having to replace tiresFishtailed so easily? Bad tires? ABS?Filling the tires with something other than air, to avoid puncture hassles?Used Michelin tires safe to install?Do these tyre cracks necessitate replacement?Rumbling noise: tires or mechanicalIs it possible to fix noisy feathered tires?Are bad winter tires still better than summer tires in winter?Torque converter failure - Related to replacing only 2 tires?Why use snow tires on all 4 wheels on 2-wheel-drive cars?