Problem with TransformedDistribution The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWhen are `If`, `Piecewise`, `Switch`, and `Which` interchangeable and when are they not?Partial convolution of random variables in random vectorsCalculate PDF and CDF of a product of independent exponentially distributed random variablesConditional probabilityFullSimplify on TransformedDistributionNProbability not reliability analysis?Fitting data to an Normal Inverse Gaussian distributionDependency of parameter to find maximum vanishes after simplificationTransformedDistribution using $k$ iid random variables, but $k$ not fixedDistribution of Function of Random Sum of Random Variables

My ex-girlfriend uses my Apple ID to login to her iPad, do I have to give her my Apple ID password to reset it?

Are the names of these months realistic?

"Eavesdropping" vs "Listen in on"

Can I calculate next year's exemptions based on this year's refund/amount owed?

Easy to read palindrome checker

Is French Guiana a (hard) EU border?

Do scriptures give a method to recognize a truly self-realized person/jivanmukta?

(How) Could a medieval fantasy world survive a magic-induced "nuclear winter"?

Expressing the idea of having a very busy time

Is it ever safe to open a suspicious HTML file (e.g. email attachment)?

Purpose of level-shifter with same in and out voltages

Prepend last line of stdin to entire stdin

Can this note be analyzed as a non-chord tone?

Spaces in which all closed sets are regular closed

Physiological effects of huge anime eyes

Is there an equivalent of cd - for cp or mv

What is the difference between Statistical Mechanics and Quantum Mechanics

How to use ReplaceAll on an expression that contains a rule

Reference request: Grassmannian and Plucker coordinates in type B, C, D

Can Sneak Attack be used when hitting with an improvised weapon?

What day is it again?

How to find image of a complex function with given constraints?

Inexact numbers as keys in Association?

What CSS properties can the br tag have?



Problem with TransformedDistribution



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWhen are `If`, `Piecewise`, `Switch`, and `Which` interchangeable and when are they not?Partial convolution of random variables in random vectorsCalculate PDF and CDF of a product of independent exponentially distributed random variablesConditional probabilityFullSimplify on TransformedDistributionNProbability not reliability analysis?Fitting data to an Normal Inverse Gaussian distributionDependency of parameter to find maximum vanishes after simplificationTransformedDistribution using $k$ iid random variables, but $k$ not fixedDistribution of Function of Random Sum of Random Variables










4












$begingroup$


I am trying to use Mathematica to obtain the probability distribution of $frac12(A + B)$ where $A$ and $B$ are independent random variables each distributed according to the uniform distribution, with lower and upper bounds of $L$ and $H$ respectively.



I suspect the distribution is triangular with lower and upper bounds of $L$ and $H$ respectively and mode equal to $frac12(A + B)$. However, I am having difficulty using TransformedDistribution to show that.



My code is:



[ScriptCapitalD] = TransformedDistribution[1/2 (A + B), B [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H], A [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H]]









share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    That was a typo. But I am still not getting what I expect.
    $endgroup$
    – user120911
    Mar 23 at 19:16










  • $begingroup$
    Did you try PDF[[ScriptCapitalD], y]?
    $endgroup$
    – JimB
    Mar 23 at 19:18






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Why not check the PDFs? Simplify[PDF[TransformedDistribution[(a + b)/2, a, b [Distributed] UniformDistribution[l, h, l, h]], t] == PDF[TriangularDistribution[l, h], t], l < t < h]
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is slightly pensive
    Mar 23 at 20:04






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think I have found a bug! Try the following two expressions. The only difference is that I use U in one and H in the other for the upper limit. Simplify[PDF[TransformedDistribution[(A + B)/2, A, B [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, U, L, U]], t] == PDF[TriangularDistribution[L, U], t], L < t < U] and Simplify[PDF[TransformedDistribution[(A + B)/2, A, B [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H, L, H]], t] == PDF[TriangularDistribution[L, H], t], L < t < H]
    $endgroup$
    – user120911
    Mar 23 at 20:35







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @user120911 It does look like a bug to me. I think you should report it to WRI.
    $endgroup$
    – Silvia
    Mar 24 at 19:35















4












$begingroup$


I am trying to use Mathematica to obtain the probability distribution of $frac12(A + B)$ where $A$ and $B$ are independent random variables each distributed according to the uniform distribution, with lower and upper bounds of $L$ and $H$ respectively.



I suspect the distribution is triangular with lower and upper bounds of $L$ and $H$ respectively and mode equal to $frac12(A + B)$. However, I am having difficulty using TransformedDistribution to show that.



My code is:



[ScriptCapitalD] = TransformedDistribution[1/2 (A + B), B [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H], A [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H]]









share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    That was a typo. But I am still not getting what I expect.
    $endgroup$
    – user120911
    Mar 23 at 19:16










  • $begingroup$
    Did you try PDF[[ScriptCapitalD], y]?
    $endgroup$
    – JimB
    Mar 23 at 19:18






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Why not check the PDFs? Simplify[PDF[TransformedDistribution[(a + b)/2, a, b [Distributed] UniformDistribution[l, h, l, h]], t] == PDF[TriangularDistribution[l, h], t], l < t < h]
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is slightly pensive
    Mar 23 at 20:04






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think I have found a bug! Try the following two expressions. The only difference is that I use U in one and H in the other for the upper limit. Simplify[PDF[TransformedDistribution[(A + B)/2, A, B [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, U, L, U]], t] == PDF[TriangularDistribution[L, U], t], L < t < U] and Simplify[PDF[TransformedDistribution[(A + B)/2, A, B [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H, L, H]], t] == PDF[TriangularDistribution[L, H], t], L < t < H]
    $endgroup$
    – user120911
    Mar 23 at 20:35







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @user120911 It does look like a bug to me. I think you should report it to WRI.
    $endgroup$
    – Silvia
    Mar 24 at 19:35













4












4








4





$begingroup$


I am trying to use Mathematica to obtain the probability distribution of $frac12(A + B)$ where $A$ and $B$ are independent random variables each distributed according to the uniform distribution, with lower and upper bounds of $L$ and $H$ respectively.



I suspect the distribution is triangular with lower and upper bounds of $L$ and $H$ respectively and mode equal to $frac12(A + B)$. However, I am having difficulty using TransformedDistribution to show that.



My code is:



[ScriptCapitalD] = TransformedDistribution[1/2 (A + B), B [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H], A [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H]]









share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I am trying to use Mathematica to obtain the probability distribution of $frac12(A + B)$ where $A$ and $B$ are independent random variables each distributed according to the uniform distribution, with lower and upper bounds of $L$ and $H$ respectively.



I suspect the distribution is triangular with lower and upper bounds of $L$ and $H$ respectively and mode equal to $frac12(A + B)$. However, I am having difficulty using TransformedDistribution to show that.



My code is:



[ScriptCapitalD] = TransformedDistribution[1/2 (A + B), B [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H], A [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H]]






probability-or-statistics distributions






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 24 at 12:59









J. M. is slightly pensive

98.8k10311467




98.8k10311467










asked Mar 23 at 19:06









user120911user120911

75128




75128











  • $begingroup$
    That was a typo. But I am still not getting what I expect.
    $endgroup$
    – user120911
    Mar 23 at 19:16










  • $begingroup$
    Did you try PDF[[ScriptCapitalD], y]?
    $endgroup$
    – JimB
    Mar 23 at 19:18






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Why not check the PDFs? Simplify[PDF[TransformedDistribution[(a + b)/2, a, b [Distributed] UniformDistribution[l, h, l, h]], t] == PDF[TriangularDistribution[l, h], t], l < t < h]
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is slightly pensive
    Mar 23 at 20:04






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think I have found a bug! Try the following two expressions. The only difference is that I use U in one and H in the other for the upper limit. Simplify[PDF[TransformedDistribution[(A + B)/2, A, B [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, U, L, U]], t] == PDF[TriangularDistribution[L, U], t], L < t < U] and Simplify[PDF[TransformedDistribution[(A + B)/2, A, B [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H, L, H]], t] == PDF[TriangularDistribution[L, H], t], L < t < H]
    $endgroup$
    – user120911
    Mar 23 at 20:35







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @user120911 It does look like a bug to me. I think you should report it to WRI.
    $endgroup$
    – Silvia
    Mar 24 at 19:35
















  • $begingroup$
    That was a typo. But I am still not getting what I expect.
    $endgroup$
    – user120911
    Mar 23 at 19:16










  • $begingroup$
    Did you try PDF[[ScriptCapitalD], y]?
    $endgroup$
    – JimB
    Mar 23 at 19:18






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Why not check the PDFs? Simplify[PDF[TransformedDistribution[(a + b)/2, a, b [Distributed] UniformDistribution[l, h, l, h]], t] == PDF[TriangularDistribution[l, h], t], l < t < h]
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is slightly pensive
    Mar 23 at 20:04






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think I have found a bug! Try the following two expressions. The only difference is that I use U in one and H in the other for the upper limit. Simplify[PDF[TransformedDistribution[(A + B)/2, A, B [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, U, L, U]], t] == PDF[TriangularDistribution[L, U], t], L < t < U] and Simplify[PDF[TransformedDistribution[(A + B)/2, A, B [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H, L, H]], t] == PDF[TriangularDistribution[L, H], t], L < t < H]
    $endgroup$
    – user120911
    Mar 23 at 20:35







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @user120911 It does look like a bug to me. I think you should report it to WRI.
    $endgroup$
    – Silvia
    Mar 24 at 19:35















$begingroup$
That was a typo. But I am still not getting what I expect.
$endgroup$
– user120911
Mar 23 at 19:16




$begingroup$
That was a typo. But I am still not getting what I expect.
$endgroup$
– user120911
Mar 23 at 19:16












$begingroup$
Did you try PDF[[ScriptCapitalD], y]?
$endgroup$
– JimB
Mar 23 at 19:18




$begingroup$
Did you try PDF[[ScriptCapitalD], y]?
$endgroup$
– JimB
Mar 23 at 19:18




2




2




$begingroup$
Why not check the PDFs? Simplify[PDF[TransformedDistribution[(a + b)/2, a, b [Distributed] UniformDistribution[l, h, l, h]], t] == PDF[TriangularDistribution[l, h], t], l < t < h]
$endgroup$
– J. M. is slightly pensive
Mar 23 at 20:04




$begingroup$
Why not check the PDFs? Simplify[PDF[TransformedDistribution[(a + b)/2, a, b [Distributed] UniformDistribution[l, h, l, h]], t] == PDF[TriangularDistribution[l, h], t], l < t < h]
$endgroup$
– J. M. is slightly pensive
Mar 23 at 20:04




1




1




$begingroup$
I think I have found a bug! Try the following two expressions. The only difference is that I use U in one and H in the other for the upper limit. Simplify[PDF[TransformedDistribution[(A + B)/2, A, B [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, U, L, U]], t] == PDF[TriangularDistribution[L, U], t], L < t < U] and Simplify[PDF[TransformedDistribution[(A + B)/2, A, B [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H, L, H]], t] == PDF[TriangularDistribution[L, H], t], L < t < H]
$endgroup$
– user120911
Mar 23 at 20:35





$begingroup$
I think I have found a bug! Try the following two expressions. The only difference is that I use U in one and H in the other for the upper limit. Simplify[PDF[TransformedDistribution[(A + B)/2, A, B [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, U, L, U]], t] == PDF[TriangularDistribution[L, U], t], L < t < U] and Simplify[PDF[TransformedDistribution[(A + B)/2, A, B [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H, L, H]], t] == PDF[TriangularDistribution[L, H], t], L < t < H]
$endgroup$
– user120911
Mar 23 at 20:35





1




1




$begingroup$
@user120911 It does look like a bug to me. I think you should report it to WRI.
$endgroup$
– Silvia
Mar 24 at 19:35




$begingroup$
@user120911 It does look like a bug to me. I think you should report it to WRI.
$endgroup$
– Silvia
Mar 24 at 19:35










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















8












$begingroup$

You get what you expect if you do it it in two steps



[ScriptCapitalD] = 
TransformedDistribution[x/2,
x [Distributed] TransformedDistribution[(A + B),
B [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H],
A [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H]]]

(* TriangularDistribution[L, H] *)





share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    That is very nice!
    $endgroup$
    – user120911
    Mar 23 at 20:24


















3












$begingroup$

PDF[[ScriptCapitalD]][z]



(((-30 + z)Sign[-30 + z])/2 - (-20 + z)
Sign[-20 + z] + ((-10 + z)*Sign[-10 + z])/2)/100




For plotting, assign values to L and H:



L = 10; H = 30;
Plot[Evaluate@PDF[[ScriptCapitalD]][x], x, 10, 30]


enter image description here



pdF[l_, h_] := Module[L = l, H = h, Evaluate[PDF[[ScriptCapitalD]]]]
Plot[Evaluate @ Flatten@Table[pdF[l, h][x], l, 0, 5, h, 10, 15], x, 0, 15,
PlotRange -> All,
PlotLegends -> (Flatten @ Table[ToString@l, h, l, 0, 5, h, 10, 15])]


enter image description here






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    That confirms my intution, but can you get Mathematica to output the PDF for the triangular distribution? That is what I am having trouble doing.
    $endgroup$
    – user120911
    Mar 23 at 19:30












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "387"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f193838%2fproblem-with-transformeddistribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









8












$begingroup$

You get what you expect if you do it it in two steps



[ScriptCapitalD] = 
TransformedDistribution[x/2,
x [Distributed] TransformedDistribution[(A + B),
B [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H],
A [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H]]]

(* TriangularDistribution[L, H] *)





share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    That is very nice!
    $endgroup$
    – user120911
    Mar 23 at 20:24















8












$begingroup$

You get what you expect if you do it it in two steps



[ScriptCapitalD] = 
TransformedDistribution[x/2,
x [Distributed] TransformedDistribution[(A + B),
B [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H],
A [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H]]]

(* TriangularDistribution[L, H] *)





share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    That is very nice!
    $endgroup$
    – user120911
    Mar 23 at 20:24













8












8








8





$begingroup$

You get what you expect if you do it it in two steps



[ScriptCapitalD] = 
TransformedDistribution[x/2,
x [Distributed] TransformedDistribution[(A + B),
B [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H],
A [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H]]]

(* TriangularDistribution[L, H] *)





share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



You get what you expect if you do it it in two steps



[ScriptCapitalD] = 
TransformedDistribution[x/2,
x [Distributed] TransformedDistribution[(A + B),
B [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H],
A [Distributed] UniformDistribution[L, H]]]

(* TriangularDistribution[L, H] *)






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Mar 23 at 20:12









Bob HanlonBob Hanlon

61.1k33598




61.1k33598











  • $begingroup$
    That is very nice!
    $endgroup$
    – user120911
    Mar 23 at 20:24
















  • $begingroup$
    That is very nice!
    $endgroup$
    – user120911
    Mar 23 at 20:24















$begingroup$
That is very nice!
$endgroup$
– user120911
Mar 23 at 20:24




$begingroup$
That is very nice!
$endgroup$
– user120911
Mar 23 at 20:24











3












$begingroup$

PDF[[ScriptCapitalD]][z]



(((-30 + z)Sign[-30 + z])/2 - (-20 + z)
Sign[-20 + z] + ((-10 + z)*Sign[-10 + z])/2)/100




For plotting, assign values to L and H:



L = 10; H = 30;
Plot[Evaluate@PDF[[ScriptCapitalD]][x], x, 10, 30]


enter image description here



pdF[l_, h_] := Module[L = l, H = h, Evaluate[PDF[[ScriptCapitalD]]]]
Plot[Evaluate @ Flatten@Table[pdF[l, h][x], l, 0, 5, h, 10, 15], x, 0, 15,
PlotRange -> All,
PlotLegends -> (Flatten @ Table[ToString@l, h, l, 0, 5, h, 10, 15])]


enter image description here






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    That confirms my intution, but can you get Mathematica to output the PDF for the triangular distribution? That is what I am having trouble doing.
    $endgroup$
    – user120911
    Mar 23 at 19:30
















3












$begingroup$

PDF[[ScriptCapitalD]][z]



(((-30 + z)Sign[-30 + z])/2 - (-20 + z)
Sign[-20 + z] + ((-10 + z)*Sign[-10 + z])/2)/100




For plotting, assign values to L and H:



L = 10; H = 30;
Plot[Evaluate@PDF[[ScriptCapitalD]][x], x, 10, 30]


enter image description here



pdF[l_, h_] := Module[L = l, H = h, Evaluate[PDF[[ScriptCapitalD]]]]
Plot[Evaluate @ Flatten@Table[pdF[l, h][x], l, 0, 5, h, 10, 15], x, 0, 15,
PlotRange -> All,
PlotLegends -> (Flatten @ Table[ToString@l, h, l, 0, 5, h, 10, 15])]


enter image description here






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    That confirms my intution, but can you get Mathematica to output the PDF for the triangular distribution? That is what I am having trouble doing.
    $endgroup$
    – user120911
    Mar 23 at 19:30














3












3








3





$begingroup$

PDF[[ScriptCapitalD]][z]



(((-30 + z)Sign[-30 + z])/2 - (-20 + z)
Sign[-20 + z] + ((-10 + z)*Sign[-10 + z])/2)/100




For plotting, assign values to L and H:



L = 10; H = 30;
Plot[Evaluate@PDF[[ScriptCapitalD]][x], x, 10, 30]


enter image description here



pdF[l_, h_] := Module[L = l, H = h, Evaluate[PDF[[ScriptCapitalD]]]]
Plot[Evaluate @ Flatten@Table[pdF[l, h][x], l, 0, 5, h, 10, 15], x, 0, 15,
PlotRange -> All,
PlotLegends -> (Flatten @ Table[ToString@l, h, l, 0, 5, h, 10, 15])]


enter image description here






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



PDF[[ScriptCapitalD]][z]



(((-30 + z)Sign[-30 + z])/2 - (-20 + z)
Sign[-20 + z] + ((-10 + z)*Sign[-10 + z])/2)/100




For plotting, assign values to L and H:



L = 10; H = 30;
Plot[Evaluate@PDF[[ScriptCapitalD]][x], x, 10, 30]


enter image description here



pdF[l_, h_] := Module[L = l, H = h, Evaluate[PDF[[ScriptCapitalD]]]]
Plot[Evaluate @ Flatten@Table[pdF[l, h][x], l, 0, 5, h, 10, 15], x, 0, 15,
PlotRange -> All,
PlotLegends -> (Flatten @ Table[ToString@l, h, l, 0, 5, h, 10, 15])]


enter image description here







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Mar 23 at 19:25









kglrkglr

190k10206424




190k10206424











  • $begingroup$
    That confirms my intution, but can you get Mathematica to output the PDF for the triangular distribution? That is what I am having trouble doing.
    $endgroup$
    – user120911
    Mar 23 at 19:30

















  • $begingroup$
    That confirms my intution, but can you get Mathematica to output the PDF for the triangular distribution? That is what I am having trouble doing.
    $endgroup$
    – user120911
    Mar 23 at 19:30
















$begingroup$
That confirms my intution, but can you get Mathematica to output the PDF for the triangular distribution? That is what I am having trouble doing.
$endgroup$
– user120911
Mar 23 at 19:30





$begingroup$
That confirms my intution, but can you get Mathematica to output the PDF for the triangular distribution? That is what I am having trouble doing.
$endgroup$
– user120911
Mar 23 at 19:30


















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f193838%2fproblem-with-transformeddistribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Adding axes to figuresAdding axes labels to LaTeX figuresLaTeX equivalent of ConTeXt buffersRotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?adding axes to shapesAlign axes across subfiguresAdding figures with a certain orderLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themAdding axes labels to LaTeX figures

Luettelo Yhdysvaltain laivaston lentotukialuksista Lähteet | Navigointivalikko

Gary (muusikko) Sisällysluettelo Historia | Rockin' High | Lähteet | Aiheesta muualla | NavigointivalikkoInfobox OKTuomas "Gary" Keskinen Ancaran kitaristiksiProjekti Rockin' High