Why does Async/Await work properly when the loop is inside the async function and not the other way around? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowJavaScript closure inside loops – simple practical exampleHttpClient.GetAsync(…) never returns when using await/asyncHow and when to use ‘async’ and ‘await’When correctly use Task.Run and when just async-awaitWhy is my variable unaltered after I modify it inside of a function? - Asynchronous code referenceCombination of async function + await + setTimeoutCall async/await functions in parallelUsing async/await with a forEach loopECMAScript7 async/await inconsistent behavior depending on whether using brackets in arrow function or notcode inside async function executes before the code that follows itasync / await not working?

Does Germany produce more waste than the US?

How to find image of a complex function with given constraints?

Help! I cannot understand this game’s notations!

Why is the US ranked as #45 in Press Freedom ratings, despite its extremely permissive free speech laws?

Reference request: Grassmannian and Plucker coordinates in type B, C, D

Scary film where a woman has vaginal teeth

Easy to read palindrome checker

What steps are necessary to read a Modern SSD in Medieval Europe?

IC has pull-down resistors on SMBus lines?

How did Beeri the Hittite come up with naming his daughter Yehudit?

What CSS properties can the br tag have?

Is there a way to save my career from absolute disaster?

Computationally populating tables with probability data

(How) Could a medieval fantasy world survive a magic-induced "nuclear winter"?

How to use ReplaceAll on an expression that contains a rule

TikZ: How to fill area with a special pattern?

Is it OK to decorate a log book cover?

How do I fit a non linear curve?

Can I calculate next year's exemptions based on this year's refund/amount owed?

What would be the main consequences for a country leaving the WTO?

Is there a difference between "Fahrstuhl" and "Aufzug"?

Airplane gently rocking its wings during whole flight

Expressing the idea of having a very busy time

"Eavesdropping" vs "Listen in on"



Why does Async/Await work properly when the loop is inside the async function and not the other way around?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowJavaScript closure inside loops – simple practical exampleHttpClient.GetAsync(…) never returns when using await/asyncHow and when to use ‘async’ and ‘await’When correctly use Task.Run and when just async-awaitWhy is my variable unaltered after I modify it inside of a function? - Asynchronous code referenceCombination of async function + await + setTimeoutCall async/await functions in parallelUsing async/await with a forEach loopECMAScript7 async/await inconsistent behavior depending on whether using brackets in arrow function or notcode inside async function executes before the code that follows itasync / await not working?










12















I have three snippets that loop three times while awaiting on a promise.



In the first snippet, it works as I expect and the value of i is decremented with each await.



let i = 3;

(async () =>
while (i)
await Promise.resolve();
console.log(i);
i--;

)();


Output:



3
2
1



In the second one, the value of i is continuously decremented until it reaches zero and then all the awaits are executed.



let i = 3;

while (i)
(async () =>
await Promise.resolve();
console.log(i);
)();
i--;



Output:



0
0
0



Lastly, this one causes an Allocation failed - JavaScript heap out of memory error and doesn't print any values.



let i = 3;
while (i)
(async () =>
await Promise.resolve();
console.log(i);
i--;
)();




Can someone explain why they exhibit these different behaviors? Thanks.










share|improve this question



















  • 9





    Do you know how async functions desugar to promises?

    – Bergi
    Mar 24 at 13:00











  • @Bergi It's just a syntactic sugar for dealing with promises instead of using the .then() and .catch() methods. Am I right ?

    – Ahmed Karaman
    Mar 25 at 15:39











  • Yes, basically. So what do you think would your code look like if written with then()?

    – Bergi
    Mar 25 at 15:41











  • For the second snippet, it would be: while (i) Promise.resolve().then(res => console.log(i)); i--;

    – Ahmed Karaman
    Mar 25 at 16:25












  • Exactly. And it seems obvious now why this logs 0 three times.

    – Bergi
    Mar 25 at 17:44















12















I have three snippets that loop three times while awaiting on a promise.



In the first snippet, it works as I expect and the value of i is decremented with each await.



let i = 3;

(async () =>
while (i)
await Promise.resolve();
console.log(i);
i--;

)();


Output:



3
2
1



In the second one, the value of i is continuously decremented until it reaches zero and then all the awaits are executed.



let i = 3;

while (i)
(async () =>
await Promise.resolve();
console.log(i);
)();
i--;



Output:



0
0
0



Lastly, this one causes an Allocation failed - JavaScript heap out of memory error and doesn't print any values.



let i = 3;
while (i)
(async () =>
await Promise.resolve();
console.log(i);
i--;
)();




Can someone explain why they exhibit these different behaviors? Thanks.










share|improve this question



















  • 9





    Do you know how async functions desugar to promises?

    – Bergi
    Mar 24 at 13:00











  • @Bergi It's just a syntactic sugar for dealing with promises instead of using the .then() and .catch() methods. Am I right ?

    – Ahmed Karaman
    Mar 25 at 15:39











  • Yes, basically. So what do you think would your code look like if written with then()?

    – Bergi
    Mar 25 at 15:41











  • For the second snippet, it would be: while (i) Promise.resolve().then(res => console.log(i)); i--;

    – Ahmed Karaman
    Mar 25 at 16:25












  • Exactly. And it seems obvious now why this logs 0 three times.

    – Bergi
    Mar 25 at 17:44













12












12








12


1






I have three snippets that loop three times while awaiting on a promise.



In the first snippet, it works as I expect and the value of i is decremented with each await.



let i = 3;

(async () =>
while (i)
await Promise.resolve();
console.log(i);
i--;

)();


Output:



3
2
1



In the second one, the value of i is continuously decremented until it reaches zero and then all the awaits are executed.



let i = 3;

while (i)
(async () =>
await Promise.resolve();
console.log(i);
)();
i--;



Output:



0
0
0



Lastly, this one causes an Allocation failed - JavaScript heap out of memory error and doesn't print any values.



let i = 3;
while (i)
(async () =>
await Promise.resolve();
console.log(i);
i--;
)();




Can someone explain why they exhibit these different behaviors? Thanks.










share|improve this question
















I have three snippets that loop three times while awaiting on a promise.



In the first snippet, it works as I expect and the value of i is decremented with each await.



let i = 3;

(async () =>
while (i)
await Promise.resolve();
console.log(i);
i--;

)();


Output:



3
2
1



In the second one, the value of i is continuously decremented until it reaches zero and then all the awaits are executed.



let i = 3;

while (i)
(async () =>
await Promise.resolve();
console.log(i);
)();
i--;



Output:



0
0
0



Lastly, this one causes an Allocation failed - JavaScript heap out of memory error and doesn't print any values.



let i = 3;
while (i)
(async () =>
await Promise.resolve();
console.log(i);
i--;
)();




Can someone explain why they exhibit these different behaviors? Thanks.







javascript async-await es6-promise






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 24 at 12:41







Ahmed Karaman

















asked Mar 24 at 12:11









Ahmed KaramanAhmed Karaman

34719




34719







  • 9





    Do you know how async functions desugar to promises?

    – Bergi
    Mar 24 at 13:00











  • @Bergi It's just a syntactic sugar for dealing with promises instead of using the .then() and .catch() methods. Am I right ?

    – Ahmed Karaman
    Mar 25 at 15:39











  • Yes, basically. So what do you think would your code look like if written with then()?

    – Bergi
    Mar 25 at 15:41











  • For the second snippet, it would be: while (i) Promise.resolve().then(res => console.log(i)); i--;

    – Ahmed Karaman
    Mar 25 at 16:25












  • Exactly. And it seems obvious now why this logs 0 three times.

    – Bergi
    Mar 25 at 17:44












  • 9





    Do you know how async functions desugar to promises?

    – Bergi
    Mar 24 at 13:00











  • @Bergi It's just a syntactic sugar for dealing with promises instead of using the .then() and .catch() methods. Am I right ?

    – Ahmed Karaman
    Mar 25 at 15:39











  • Yes, basically. So what do you think would your code look like if written with then()?

    – Bergi
    Mar 25 at 15:41











  • For the second snippet, it would be: while (i) Promise.resolve().then(res => console.log(i)); i--;

    – Ahmed Karaman
    Mar 25 at 16:25












  • Exactly. And it seems obvious now why this logs 0 three times.

    – Bergi
    Mar 25 at 17:44







9




9





Do you know how async functions desugar to promises?

– Bergi
Mar 24 at 13:00





Do you know how async functions desugar to promises?

– Bergi
Mar 24 at 13:00













@Bergi It's just a syntactic sugar for dealing with promises instead of using the .then() and .catch() methods. Am I right ?

– Ahmed Karaman
Mar 25 at 15:39





@Bergi It's just a syntactic sugar for dealing with promises instead of using the .then() and .catch() methods. Am I right ?

– Ahmed Karaman
Mar 25 at 15:39













Yes, basically. So what do you think would your code look like if written with then()?

– Bergi
Mar 25 at 15:41





Yes, basically. So what do you think would your code look like if written with then()?

– Bergi
Mar 25 at 15:41













For the second snippet, it would be: while (i) Promise.resolve().then(res => console.log(i)); i--;

– Ahmed Karaman
Mar 25 at 16:25






For the second snippet, it would be: while (i) Promise.resolve().then(res => console.log(i)); i--;

– Ahmed Karaman
Mar 25 at 16:25














Exactly. And it seems obvious now why this logs 0 three times.

– Bergi
Mar 25 at 17:44





Exactly. And it seems obvious now why this logs 0 three times.

– Bergi
Mar 25 at 17:44












4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















15














Concerning your second snippet:



Caling an async function without awaiting it's result is called fire and forget. You tell JavaScript that it should start some asynchronous processing, but you do not care when and how it finishes. That's what happens. It loops, fires some asynchronous tasks, when the loop is done they somewhen finish, and will log 0 as the loop already reached its end. If you'd do:



await (async () => 
await Promise.resolve();
console.log(i);
)();


it will loop in order.



Concerning your third snippet:



You never decrement i in the loop, therefore the loop runs forever. It would decrement i if the asynchronous tasks where executed somewhen, but that does not happen as the while loop runs crazy and blocks & crashes the browser.



 let i = 3;
while(i > 0)
doStuff();






share|improve this answer
































    9














    Focusing primarily on the last example:



    let i = 3;
    while (i)
    (async () =>
    await Promise.resolve();
    console.log(i);
    i--;
    )();



    It may help if we rewrite the code without async/await to reveal what it is really doing. Under the hood, the code execution of the async function is deferred for later:



    let callbacks = [];

    let i = 0;
    while (i > 0)
    callbacks.push(() =>
    console.log(i);
    i--;
    );


    callbacks.forEach(cb =>
    cb();
    );


    As you can see, none of the callbacks are executed until after the loop is completed. Since the loop never halts, eventually the vm will run out of space to store callbacks.






    share|improve this answer






























      2














      Because in the first case console.log and decrement work in sync with each other because they are both inside the same asnychronous function.
      In the second case console.log works asynchronously and decrement works synchronously.
      Therefore, the decrement will be executed first, the asynchronous function will wait for the synchronous function to finish, then it will be executed with i == 0



      In the third case, the loop body executes synchronously, and runs the asynchronous function at each iteration. Therefore, the decrement can not work until the end of the loop, so the condition in the cycle is always true. And so until the stack or memory is full






      share|improve this answer
































        2














        In your particular example it decrements the i and then runs the async code like:



        let i = 3;

        while (i)
        // >---------------------------



        Regarding your third snippet, it will never decrease the i value and so loop runs forever and thus crashes application:



        let i = 3;
        while (i)
        (async () =>
        )(); //





        share|improve this answer

























        • Not really, If you would remove the await Promise.resolve it would log correctly.

          – Jonas Wilms
          Mar 24 at 12:16











        • @Bhojendra Rauniyar Can you please check this third snippet?

          – Ahmed Karaman
          Mar 24 at 12:37











        • @JonasWilms Does what you say mean that if we have an async function without an await in its body that it will be blocking and run synchronously like any other function?

          – Ahmed Karaman
          Mar 24 at 13:35







        • 2





          the asynchronous code runs in background this is incorrect. The async code is deferred, and since event loop is busy with infinite while loop the async code never runs. if it was in background, the output numbers would be random but the i would be equal to zero eventually.

          – meze
          Mar 24 at 14:28






        • 1





          @BhojendraRauniyar JavaScript is single-threaded, so there is no “background”. Only one chunk of code can run at one time. I’m fuzzing over some of the details here, but there is a single event loop that dequeues a pending callback and runs it to completion. In order to prevent blocking (such as waiting for a timer or a network request), code is broken up into smaller callbacks in order to give competing events their chance to run in the single thread. await is just syntactic sugar for “schedule a callback to run after the thing we’re waiting on is available”.

          – Joel Cornett
          Mar 24 at 15:14











        Your Answer






        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
        StackExchange.snippets.init();
        );
        );
        , "code-snippets");

        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "1"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );













        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55323666%2fwhy-does-async-await-work-properly-when-the-loop-is-inside-the-async-function-an%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        15














        Concerning your second snippet:



        Caling an async function without awaiting it's result is called fire and forget. You tell JavaScript that it should start some asynchronous processing, but you do not care when and how it finishes. That's what happens. It loops, fires some asynchronous tasks, when the loop is done they somewhen finish, and will log 0 as the loop already reached its end. If you'd do:



        await (async () => 
        await Promise.resolve();
        console.log(i);
        )();


        it will loop in order.



        Concerning your third snippet:



        You never decrement i in the loop, therefore the loop runs forever. It would decrement i if the asynchronous tasks where executed somewhen, but that does not happen as the while loop runs crazy and blocks & crashes the browser.



         let i = 3;
        while(i > 0)
        doStuff();






        share|improve this answer





























          15














          Concerning your second snippet:



          Caling an async function without awaiting it's result is called fire and forget. You tell JavaScript that it should start some asynchronous processing, but you do not care when and how it finishes. That's what happens. It loops, fires some asynchronous tasks, when the loop is done they somewhen finish, and will log 0 as the loop already reached its end. If you'd do:



          await (async () => 
          await Promise.resolve();
          console.log(i);
          )();


          it will loop in order.



          Concerning your third snippet:



          You never decrement i in the loop, therefore the loop runs forever. It would decrement i if the asynchronous tasks where executed somewhen, but that does not happen as the while loop runs crazy and blocks & crashes the browser.



           let i = 3;
          while(i > 0)
          doStuff();






          share|improve this answer



























            15












            15








            15







            Concerning your second snippet:



            Caling an async function without awaiting it's result is called fire and forget. You tell JavaScript that it should start some asynchronous processing, but you do not care when and how it finishes. That's what happens. It loops, fires some asynchronous tasks, when the loop is done they somewhen finish, and will log 0 as the loop already reached its end. If you'd do:



            await (async () => 
            await Promise.resolve();
            console.log(i);
            )();


            it will loop in order.



            Concerning your third snippet:



            You never decrement i in the loop, therefore the loop runs forever. It would decrement i if the asynchronous tasks where executed somewhen, but that does not happen as the while loop runs crazy and blocks & crashes the browser.



             let i = 3;
            while(i > 0)
            doStuff();






            share|improve this answer















            Concerning your second snippet:



            Caling an async function without awaiting it's result is called fire and forget. You tell JavaScript that it should start some asynchronous processing, but you do not care when and how it finishes. That's what happens. It loops, fires some asynchronous tasks, when the loop is done they somewhen finish, and will log 0 as the loop already reached its end. If you'd do:



            await (async () => 
            await Promise.resolve();
            console.log(i);
            )();


            it will loop in order.



            Concerning your third snippet:



            You never decrement i in the loop, therefore the loop runs forever. It would decrement i if the asynchronous tasks where executed somewhen, but that does not happen as the while loop runs crazy and blocks & crashes the browser.



             let i = 3;
            while(i > 0)
            doStuff();







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Mar 25 at 11:43

























            answered Mar 24 at 12:14









            Jonas WilmsJonas Wilms

            64.2k53457




            64.2k53457























                9














                Focusing primarily on the last example:



                let i = 3;
                while (i)
                (async () =>
                await Promise.resolve();
                console.log(i);
                i--;
                )();



                It may help if we rewrite the code without async/await to reveal what it is really doing. Under the hood, the code execution of the async function is deferred for later:



                let callbacks = [];

                let i = 0;
                while (i > 0)
                callbacks.push(() =>
                console.log(i);
                i--;
                );


                callbacks.forEach(cb =>
                cb();
                );


                As you can see, none of the callbacks are executed until after the loop is completed. Since the loop never halts, eventually the vm will run out of space to store callbacks.






                share|improve this answer



























                  9














                  Focusing primarily on the last example:



                  let i = 3;
                  while (i)
                  (async () =>
                  await Promise.resolve();
                  console.log(i);
                  i--;
                  )();



                  It may help if we rewrite the code without async/await to reveal what it is really doing. Under the hood, the code execution of the async function is deferred for later:



                  let callbacks = [];

                  let i = 0;
                  while (i > 0)
                  callbacks.push(() =>
                  console.log(i);
                  i--;
                  );


                  callbacks.forEach(cb =>
                  cb();
                  );


                  As you can see, none of the callbacks are executed until after the loop is completed. Since the loop never halts, eventually the vm will run out of space to store callbacks.






                  share|improve this answer

























                    9












                    9








                    9







                    Focusing primarily on the last example:



                    let i = 3;
                    while (i)
                    (async () =>
                    await Promise.resolve();
                    console.log(i);
                    i--;
                    )();



                    It may help if we rewrite the code without async/await to reveal what it is really doing. Under the hood, the code execution of the async function is deferred for later:



                    let callbacks = [];

                    let i = 0;
                    while (i > 0)
                    callbacks.push(() =>
                    console.log(i);
                    i--;
                    );


                    callbacks.forEach(cb =>
                    cb();
                    );


                    As you can see, none of the callbacks are executed until after the loop is completed. Since the loop never halts, eventually the vm will run out of space to store callbacks.






                    share|improve this answer













                    Focusing primarily on the last example:



                    let i = 3;
                    while (i)
                    (async () =>
                    await Promise.resolve();
                    console.log(i);
                    i--;
                    )();



                    It may help if we rewrite the code without async/await to reveal what it is really doing. Under the hood, the code execution of the async function is deferred for later:



                    let callbacks = [];

                    let i = 0;
                    while (i > 0)
                    callbacks.push(() =>
                    console.log(i);
                    i--;
                    );


                    callbacks.forEach(cb =>
                    cb();
                    );


                    As you can see, none of the callbacks are executed until after the loop is completed. Since the loop never halts, eventually the vm will run out of space to store callbacks.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered Mar 24 at 12:59









                    Joel CornettJoel Cornett

                    17.9k44270




                    17.9k44270





















                        2














                        Because in the first case console.log and decrement work in sync with each other because they are both inside the same asnychronous function.
                        In the second case console.log works asynchronously and decrement works synchronously.
                        Therefore, the decrement will be executed first, the asynchronous function will wait for the synchronous function to finish, then it will be executed with i == 0



                        In the third case, the loop body executes synchronously, and runs the asynchronous function at each iteration. Therefore, the decrement can not work until the end of the loop, so the condition in the cycle is always true. And so until the stack or memory is full






                        share|improve this answer





























                          2














                          Because in the first case console.log and decrement work in sync with each other because they are both inside the same asnychronous function.
                          In the second case console.log works asynchronously and decrement works synchronously.
                          Therefore, the decrement will be executed first, the asynchronous function will wait for the synchronous function to finish, then it will be executed with i == 0



                          In the third case, the loop body executes synchronously, and runs the asynchronous function at each iteration. Therefore, the decrement can not work until the end of the loop, so the condition in the cycle is always true. And so until the stack or memory is full






                          share|improve this answer



























                            2












                            2








                            2







                            Because in the first case console.log and decrement work in sync with each other because they are both inside the same asnychronous function.
                            In the second case console.log works asynchronously and decrement works synchronously.
                            Therefore, the decrement will be executed first, the asynchronous function will wait for the synchronous function to finish, then it will be executed with i == 0



                            In the third case, the loop body executes synchronously, and runs the asynchronous function at each iteration. Therefore, the decrement can not work until the end of the loop, so the condition in the cycle is always true. And so until the stack or memory is full






                            share|improve this answer















                            Because in the first case console.log and decrement work in sync with each other because they are both inside the same asnychronous function.
                            In the second case console.log works asynchronously and decrement works synchronously.
                            Therefore, the decrement will be executed first, the asynchronous function will wait for the synchronous function to finish, then it will be executed with i == 0



                            In the third case, the loop body executes synchronously, and runs the asynchronous function at each iteration. Therefore, the decrement can not work until the end of the loop, so the condition in the cycle is always true. And so until the stack or memory is full







                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited Mar 24 at 12:45

























                            answered Mar 24 at 12:19









                            Nikita UmnovNikita Umnov

                            645




                            645





















                                2














                                In your particular example it decrements the i and then runs the async code like:



                                let i = 3;

                                while (i)
                                // >---------------------------



                                Regarding your third snippet, it will never decrease the i value and so loop runs forever and thus crashes application:



                                let i = 3;
                                while (i)
                                (async () =>
                                )(); //





                                share|improve this answer

























                                • Not really, If you would remove the await Promise.resolve it would log correctly.

                                  – Jonas Wilms
                                  Mar 24 at 12:16











                                • @Bhojendra Rauniyar Can you please check this third snippet?

                                  – Ahmed Karaman
                                  Mar 24 at 12:37











                                • @JonasWilms Does what you say mean that if we have an async function without an await in its body that it will be blocking and run synchronously like any other function?

                                  – Ahmed Karaman
                                  Mar 24 at 13:35







                                • 2





                                  the asynchronous code runs in background this is incorrect. The async code is deferred, and since event loop is busy with infinite while loop the async code never runs. if it was in background, the output numbers would be random but the i would be equal to zero eventually.

                                  – meze
                                  Mar 24 at 14:28






                                • 1





                                  @BhojendraRauniyar JavaScript is single-threaded, so there is no “background”. Only one chunk of code can run at one time. I’m fuzzing over some of the details here, but there is a single event loop that dequeues a pending callback and runs it to completion. In order to prevent blocking (such as waiting for a timer or a network request), code is broken up into smaller callbacks in order to give competing events their chance to run in the single thread. await is just syntactic sugar for “schedule a callback to run after the thing we’re waiting on is available”.

                                  – Joel Cornett
                                  Mar 24 at 15:14















                                2














                                In your particular example it decrements the i and then runs the async code like:



                                let i = 3;

                                while (i)
                                // >---------------------------



                                Regarding your third snippet, it will never decrease the i value and so loop runs forever and thus crashes application:



                                let i = 3;
                                while (i)
                                (async () =>
                                )(); //





                                share|improve this answer

























                                • Not really, If you would remove the await Promise.resolve it would log correctly.

                                  – Jonas Wilms
                                  Mar 24 at 12:16











                                • @Bhojendra Rauniyar Can you please check this third snippet?

                                  – Ahmed Karaman
                                  Mar 24 at 12:37











                                • @JonasWilms Does what you say mean that if we have an async function without an await in its body that it will be blocking and run synchronously like any other function?

                                  – Ahmed Karaman
                                  Mar 24 at 13:35







                                • 2





                                  the asynchronous code runs in background this is incorrect. The async code is deferred, and since event loop is busy with infinite while loop the async code never runs. if it was in background, the output numbers would be random but the i would be equal to zero eventually.

                                  – meze
                                  Mar 24 at 14:28






                                • 1





                                  @BhojendraRauniyar JavaScript is single-threaded, so there is no “background”. Only one chunk of code can run at one time. I’m fuzzing over some of the details here, but there is a single event loop that dequeues a pending callback and runs it to completion. In order to prevent blocking (such as waiting for a timer or a network request), code is broken up into smaller callbacks in order to give competing events their chance to run in the single thread. await is just syntactic sugar for “schedule a callback to run after the thing we’re waiting on is available”.

                                  – Joel Cornett
                                  Mar 24 at 15:14













                                2












                                2








                                2







                                In your particular example it decrements the i and then runs the async code like:



                                let i = 3;

                                while (i)
                                // >---------------------------



                                Regarding your third snippet, it will never decrease the i value and so loop runs forever and thus crashes application:



                                let i = 3;
                                while (i)
                                (async () =>
                                )(); //





                                share|improve this answer















                                In your particular example it decrements the i and then runs the async code like:



                                let i = 3;

                                while (i)
                                // >---------------------------



                                Regarding your third snippet, it will never decrease the i value and so loop runs forever and thus crashes application:



                                let i = 3;
                                while (i)
                                (async () =>
                                )(); //






                                share|improve this answer














                                share|improve this answer



                                share|improve this answer








                                edited Mar 24 at 15:23

























                                answered Mar 24 at 12:14









                                Bhojendra RauniyarBhojendra Rauniyar

                                52.8k2082135




                                52.8k2082135












                                • Not really, If you would remove the await Promise.resolve it would log correctly.

                                  – Jonas Wilms
                                  Mar 24 at 12:16











                                • @Bhojendra Rauniyar Can you please check this third snippet?

                                  – Ahmed Karaman
                                  Mar 24 at 12:37











                                • @JonasWilms Does what you say mean that if we have an async function without an await in its body that it will be blocking and run synchronously like any other function?

                                  – Ahmed Karaman
                                  Mar 24 at 13:35







                                • 2





                                  the asynchronous code runs in background this is incorrect. The async code is deferred, and since event loop is busy with infinite while loop the async code never runs. if it was in background, the output numbers would be random but the i would be equal to zero eventually.

                                  – meze
                                  Mar 24 at 14:28






                                • 1





                                  @BhojendraRauniyar JavaScript is single-threaded, so there is no “background”. Only one chunk of code can run at one time. I’m fuzzing over some of the details here, but there is a single event loop that dequeues a pending callback and runs it to completion. In order to prevent blocking (such as waiting for a timer or a network request), code is broken up into smaller callbacks in order to give competing events their chance to run in the single thread. await is just syntactic sugar for “schedule a callback to run after the thing we’re waiting on is available”.

                                  – Joel Cornett
                                  Mar 24 at 15:14

















                                • Not really, If you would remove the await Promise.resolve it would log correctly.

                                  – Jonas Wilms
                                  Mar 24 at 12:16











                                • @Bhojendra Rauniyar Can you please check this third snippet?

                                  – Ahmed Karaman
                                  Mar 24 at 12:37











                                • @JonasWilms Does what you say mean that if we have an async function without an await in its body that it will be blocking and run synchronously like any other function?

                                  – Ahmed Karaman
                                  Mar 24 at 13:35







                                • 2





                                  the asynchronous code runs in background this is incorrect. The async code is deferred, and since event loop is busy with infinite while loop the async code never runs. if it was in background, the output numbers would be random but the i would be equal to zero eventually.

                                  – meze
                                  Mar 24 at 14:28






                                • 1





                                  @BhojendraRauniyar JavaScript is single-threaded, so there is no “background”. Only one chunk of code can run at one time. I’m fuzzing over some of the details here, but there is a single event loop that dequeues a pending callback and runs it to completion. In order to prevent blocking (such as waiting for a timer or a network request), code is broken up into smaller callbacks in order to give competing events their chance to run in the single thread. await is just syntactic sugar for “schedule a callback to run after the thing we’re waiting on is available”.

                                  – Joel Cornett
                                  Mar 24 at 15:14
















                                Not really, If you would remove the await Promise.resolve it would log correctly.

                                – Jonas Wilms
                                Mar 24 at 12:16





                                Not really, If you would remove the await Promise.resolve it would log correctly.

                                – Jonas Wilms
                                Mar 24 at 12:16













                                @Bhojendra Rauniyar Can you please check this third snippet?

                                – Ahmed Karaman
                                Mar 24 at 12:37





                                @Bhojendra Rauniyar Can you please check this third snippet?

                                – Ahmed Karaman
                                Mar 24 at 12:37













                                @JonasWilms Does what you say mean that if we have an async function without an await in its body that it will be blocking and run synchronously like any other function?

                                – Ahmed Karaman
                                Mar 24 at 13:35






                                @JonasWilms Does what you say mean that if we have an async function without an await in its body that it will be blocking and run synchronously like any other function?

                                – Ahmed Karaman
                                Mar 24 at 13:35





                                2




                                2





                                the asynchronous code runs in background this is incorrect. The async code is deferred, and since event loop is busy with infinite while loop the async code never runs. if it was in background, the output numbers would be random but the i would be equal to zero eventually.

                                – meze
                                Mar 24 at 14:28





                                the asynchronous code runs in background this is incorrect. The async code is deferred, and since event loop is busy with infinite while loop the async code never runs. if it was in background, the output numbers would be random but the i would be equal to zero eventually.

                                – meze
                                Mar 24 at 14:28




                                1




                                1





                                @BhojendraRauniyar JavaScript is single-threaded, so there is no “background”. Only one chunk of code can run at one time. I’m fuzzing over some of the details here, but there is a single event loop that dequeues a pending callback and runs it to completion. In order to prevent blocking (such as waiting for a timer or a network request), code is broken up into smaller callbacks in order to give competing events their chance to run in the single thread. await is just syntactic sugar for “schedule a callback to run after the thing we’re waiting on is available”.

                                – Joel Cornett
                                Mar 24 at 15:14





                                @BhojendraRauniyar JavaScript is single-threaded, so there is no “background”. Only one chunk of code can run at one time. I’m fuzzing over some of the details here, but there is a single event loop that dequeues a pending callback and runs it to completion. In order to prevent blocking (such as waiting for a timer or a network request), code is broken up into smaller callbacks in order to give competing events their chance to run in the single thread. await is just syntactic sugar for “schedule a callback to run after the thing we’re waiting on is available”.

                                – Joel Cornett
                                Mar 24 at 15:14

















                                draft saved

                                draft discarded
















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55323666%2fwhy-does-async-await-work-properly-when-the-loop-is-inside-the-async-function-an%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Adding axes to figuresAdding axes labels to LaTeX figuresLaTeX equivalent of ConTeXt buffersRotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?adding axes to shapesAlign axes across subfiguresAdding figures with a certain orderLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themAdding axes labels to LaTeX figures

                                Tähtien Talli Jäsenet | Lähteet | NavigointivalikkoSuomen Hippos – Tähtien Talli

                                Do these cracks on my tires look bad? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowDry rot tire should I replace?Having to replace tiresFishtailed so easily? Bad tires? ABS?Filling the tires with something other than air, to avoid puncture hassles?Used Michelin tires safe to install?Do these tyre cracks necessitate replacement?Rumbling noise: tires or mechanicalIs it possible to fix noisy feathered tires?Are bad winter tires still better than summer tires in winter?Torque converter failure - Related to replacing only 2 tires?Why use snow tires on all 4 wheels on 2-wheel-drive cars?