How to run AgglomerativeClustering on a big data in python? The Next CEO of Stack Overflow2019 Community Moderator ElectionClustering not producing even clustersHDBSCAN cluster: still unclear to me how to chose 'min_cluster_size`How to run PCA and KNN on big-dataHow does ML Clustering put to a practical real-world use?Bag of Visual WordsUsing local outlier factor score to detect outliers at run timeHow to solve online clustering problemMulti-label classification model in python?Kmeans cluster validation when I have labeled test dataClassify big changes in target variable
Players Circumventing the limitations of Wish
Strange use of "whether ... than ..." in official text
Is there an equivalent of cd - for cp or mv
Is it professional to write unrelated content in an almost-empty email?
Traveling with my 5 year old daughter (as the father) without the mother from Germany to Mexico
Which one is the true statement?
Inexact numbers as keys in Association?
Is there a difference between "Fahrstuhl" and "Aufzug"?
Can I board the first leg of the flight without having final country's visa?
How did Beeri the Hittite come up with naming his daughter Yehudit?
Purpose of level-shifter with same in and out voltages
When "be it" is at the beginning of a sentence, what kind of structure do you call it?
Decide between Polyglossia and Babel for LuaLaTeX in 2019
Getting Stale Gas Out of a Gas Tank w/out Dropping the Tank
0-rank tensor vs vector in 1D
Prepend last line of stdin to entire stdin
In the "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix" video game, what potion is used to sabotage Umbridge's speakers?
Graph of the history of databases
Would a grinding machine be a simple and workable propulsion system for an interplanetary spacecraft?
Why don't programming languages automatically manage the synchronous/asynchronous problem?
Aggressive Under-Indexing and no data for missing index
What happened in Rome, when the western empire "fell"?
What CSS properties can the br tag have?
Help/tips for a first time writer?
How to run AgglomerativeClustering on a big data in python?
The Next CEO of Stack Overflow2019 Community Moderator ElectionClustering not producing even clustersHDBSCAN cluster: still unclear to me how to chose 'min_cluster_size`How to run PCA and KNN on big-dataHow does ML Clustering put to a practical real-world use?Bag of Visual WordsUsing local outlier factor score to detect outliers at run timeHow to solve online clustering problemMulti-label classification model in python?Kmeans cluster validation when I have labeled test dataClassify big changes in target variable
$begingroup$
I run AgglomerativeClustering on a sample of data and fit a model. then I decide to predict this fit for all of my data but I got MemoryError
.
How can I run AgglomerativeClustering on a big dataset?
should I create a classification based on clusters label?!
python clustering
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I run AgglomerativeClustering on a sample of data and fit a model. then I decide to predict this fit for all of my data but I got MemoryError
.
How can I run AgglomerativeClustering on a big dataset?
should I create a classification based on clusters label?!
python clustering
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I run AgglomerativeClustering on a sample of data and fit a model. then I decide to predict this fit for all of my data but I got MemoryError
.
How can I run AgglomerativeClustering on a big dataset?
should I create a classification based on clusters label?!
python clustering
$endgroup$
I run AgglomerativeClustering on a sample of data and fit a model. then I decide to predict this fit for all of my data but I got MemoryError
.
How can I run AgglomerativeClustering on a big dataset?
should I create a classification based on clusters label?!
python clustering
python clustering
asked Mar 24 at 10:39
parvijparvij
485214
485214
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You can't.
By definition, the algorithm needs O(n²) memory and O(n³) runtime.
This does not scale to big data.
Use a different algorithm. Or subsample your data.
Results don't necessarily get better just because you use more data. In many cases it really does not matter. The quality of estimating the mean grows with sqrt(n), so it quite quickly does not pay off to use more data, as this will only affect small digits of the result.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
>Results don't necessarily get better just because you use more data. My_Answer: I ran the algorithm on 0.02% of my data and I got the result but the problem raised when I need to label all records. so, my problem is with predicting not fitting!!!
$endgroup$
– parvij
Mar 24 at 21:40
$begingroup$
You can always train a classifier to predict the remaining points consistent with the clustered sample. For example, a nearest neighbor classifier. But if you think you need a label for every point, you are probably using clustering the wrong way. Don't trust the labels. Study the patterns found, but don't rely on them.
$endgroup$
– Anony-Mousse
Mar 24 at 22:08
$begingroup$
I do clustering for marketing, I want the label for each point because I want to do some special activities for each cluster. so, I studied clusters, I found them useful but after that, I need to use labels! (thanks Anony)
$endgroup$
– parvij
Mar 26 at 19:14
$begingroup$
Define rules based on your findings to label the points exactly as you want them. Then apply these rules to your data.
$endgroup$
– Anony-Mousse
Mar 27 at 0:01
add a comment |
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "557"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f47889%2fhow-to-run-agglomerativeclustering-on-a-big-data-in-python%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You can't.
By definition, the algorithm needs O(n²) memory and O(n³) runtime.
This does not scale to big data.
Use a different algorithm. Or subsample your data.
Results don't necessarily get better just because you use more data. In many cases it really does not matter. The quality of estimating the mean grows with sqrt(n), so it quite quickly does not pay off to use more data, as this will only affect small digits of the result.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
>Results don't necessarily get better just because you use more data. My_Answer: I ran the algorithm on 0.02% of my data and I got the result but the problem raised when I need to label all records. so, my problem is with predicting not fitting!!!
$endgroup$
– parvij
Mar 24 at 21:40
$begingroup$
You can always train a classifier to predict the remaining points consistent with the clustered sample. For example, a nearest neighbor classifier. But if you think you need a label for every point, you are probably using clustering the wrong way. Don't trust the labels. Study the patterns found, but don't rely on them.
$endgroup$
– Anony-Mousse
Mar 24 at 22:08
$begingroup$
I do clustering for marketing, I want the label for each point because I want to do some special activities for each cluster. so, I studied clusters, I found them useful but after that, I need to use labels! (thanks Anony)
$endgroup$
– parvij
Mar 26 at 19:14
$begingroup$
Define rules based on your findings to label the points exactly as you want them. Then apply these rules to your data.
$endgroup$
– Anony-Mousse
Mar 27 at 0:01
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can't.
By definition, the algorithm needs O(n²) memory and O(n³) runtime.
This does not scale to big data.
Use a different algorithm. Or subsample your data.
Results don't necessarily get better just because you use more data. In many cases it really does not matter. The quality of estimating the mean grows with sqrt(n), so it quite quickly does not pay off to use more data, as this will only affect small digits of the result.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
>Results don't necessarily get better just because you use more data. My_Answer: I ran the algorithm on 0.02% of my data and I got the result but the problem raised when I need to label all records. so, my problem is with predicting not fitting!!!
$endgroup$
– parvij
Mar 24 at 21:40
$begingroup$
You can always train a classifier to predict the remaining points consistent with the clustered sample. For example, a nearest neighbor classifier. But if you think you need a label for every point, you are probably using clustering the wrong way. Don't trust the labels. Study the patterns found, but don't rely on them.
$endgroup$
– Anony-Mousse
Mar 24 at 22:08
$begingroup$
I do clustering for marketing, I want the label for each point because I want to do some special activities for each cluster. so, I studied clusters, I found them useful but after that, I need to use labels! (thanks Anony)
$endgroup$
– parvij
Mar 26 at 19:14
$begingroup$
Define rules based on your findings to label the points exactly as you want them. Then apply these rules to your data.
$endgroup$
– Anony-Mousse
Mar 27 at 0:01
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can't.
By definition, the algorithm needs O(n²) memory and O(n³) runtime.
This does not scale to big data.
Use a different algorithm. Or subsample your data.
Results don't necessarily get better just because you use more data. In many cases it really does not matter. The quality of estimating the mean grows with sqrt(n), so it quite quickly does not pay off to use more data, as this will only affect small digits of the result.
$endgroup$
You can't.
By definition, the algorithm needs O(n²) memory and O(n³) runtime.
This does not scale to big data.
Use a different algorithm. Or subsample your data.
Results don't necessarily get better just because you use more data. In many cases it really does not matter. The quality of estimating the mean grows with sqrt(n), so it quite quickly does not pay off to use more data, as this will only affect small digits of the result.
answered Mar 24 at 14:45
Anony-MousseAnony-Mousse
5,075625
5,075625
$begingroup$
>Results don't necessarily get better just because you use more data. My_Answer: I ran the algorithm on 0.02% of my data and I got the result but the problem raised when I need to label all records. so, my problem is with predicting not fitting!!!
$endgroup$
– parvij
Mar 24 at 21:40
$begingroup$
You can always train a classifier to predict the remaining points consistent with the clustered sample. For example, a nearest neighbor classifier. But if you think you need a label for every point, you are probably using clustering the wrong way. Don't trust the labels. Study the patterns found, but don't rely on them.
$endgroup$
– Anony-Mousse
Mar 24 at 22:08
$begingroup$
I do clustering for marketing, I want the label for each point because I want to do some special activities for each cluster. so, I studied clusters, I found them useful but after that, I need to use labels! (thanks Anony)
$endgroup$
– parvij
Mar 26 at 19:14
$begingroup$
Define rules based on your findings to label the points exactly as you want them. Then apply these rules to your data.
$endgroup$
– Anony-Mousse
Mar 27 at 0:01
add a comment |
$begingroup$
>Results don't necessarily get better just because you use more data. My_Answer: I ran the algorithm on 0.02% of my data and I got the result but the problem raised when I need to label all records. so, my problem is with predicting not fitting!!!
$endgroup$
– parvij
Mar 24 at 21:40
$begingroup$
You can always train a classifier to predict the remaining points consistent with the clustered sample. For example, a nearest neighbor classifier. But if you think you need a label for every point, you are probably using clustering the wrong way. Don't trust the labels. Study the patterns found, but don't rely on them.
$endgroup$
– Anony-Mousse
Mar 24 at 22:08
$begingroup$
I do clustering for marketing, I want the label for each point because I want to do some special activities for each cluster. so, I studied clusters, I found them useful but after that, I need to use labels! (thanks Anony)
$endgroup$
– parvij
Mar 26 at 19:14
$begingroup$
Define rules based on your findings to label the points exactly as you want them. Then apply these rules to your data.
$endgroup$
– Anony-Mousse
Mar 27 at 0:01
$begingroup$
>Results don't necessarily get better just because you use more data. My_Answer: I ran the algorithm on 0.02% of my data and I got the result but the problem raised when I need to label all records. so, my problem is with predicting not fitting!!!
$endgroup$
– parvij
Mar 24 at 21:40
$begingroup$
>Results don't necessarily get better just because you use more data. My_Answer: I ran the algorithm on 0.02% of my data and I got the result but the problem raised when I need to label all records. so, my problem is with predicting not fitting!!!
$endgroup$
– parvij
Mar 24 at 21:40
$begingroup$
You can always train a classifier to predict the remaining points consistent with the clustered sample. For example, a nearest neighbor classifier. But if you think you need a label for every point, you are probably using clustering the wrong way. Don't trust the labels. Study the patterns found, but don't rely on them.
$endgroup$
– Anony-Mousse
Mar 24 at 22:08
$begingroup$
You can always train a classifier to predict the remaining points consistent with the clustered sample. For example, a nearest neighbor classifier. But if you think you need a label for every point, you are probably using clustering the wrong way. Don't trust the labels. Study the patterns found, but don't rely on them.
$endgroup$
– Anony-Mousse
Mar 24 at 22:08
$begingroup$
I do clustering for marketing, I want the label for each point because I want to do some special activities for each cluster. so, I studied clusters, I found them useful but after that, I need to use labels! (thanks Anony)
$endgroup$
– parvij
Mar 26 at 19:14
$begingroup$
I do clustering for marketing, I want the label for each point because I want to do some special activities for each cluster. so, I studied clusters, I found them useful but after that, I need to use labels! (thanks Anony)
$endgroup$
– parvij
Mar 26 at 19:14
$begingroup$
Define rules based on your findings to label the points exactly as you want them. Then apply these rules to your data.
$endgroup$
– Anony-Mousse
Mar 27 at 0:01
$begingroup$
Define rules based on your findings to label the points exactly as you want them. Then apply these rules to your data.
$endgroup$
– Anony-Mousse
Mar 27 at 0:01
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Data Science Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdatascience.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f47889%2fhow-to-run-agglomerativeclustering-on-a-big-data-in-python%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown