What would happen if the UK refused to take part in EU Parliamentary elections? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow long does it take for a parliamentary government to hold unscheduled elections?If the UK government did not follow through with Brexit what would happen?Phenomenon where politically incorrect candidates do better in actual elections than in polls?What would happen if Donald Trump lost and refused to concede the election?Montana special House election: when will the winner take office?What method can be used to estimate the likelihood of a civil war?Why are the 2019 elections an objection to extending Article 50?Research on short election cycles influencing political choices?Why is participating in the European Parliamentary elections used as a threat?What would a revoked Brexit after the 2019 EU parliament elections mean for the European Parliament?

Does the Idaho Potato Commission associate potato skins with healthy eating?

Is it convenient to ask the journal's editor for two additional days to complete a review?

Can I calculate next year's exemptions based on this year's refund/amount owed?

Aggressive Under-Indexing and no data for missing index

Why is information "lost" when it got into a black hole?

Can this note be analyzed as a non-chord tone?

free fall ellipse or parabola?

If Nick Fury and Coulson already knew about aliens (Kree and Skrull) why did they wait until Thor's appearance to start making weapons?

How to find image of a complex function with given constraints?

Getting Stale Gas Out of a Gas Tank w/out Dropping the Tank

Help! I cannot understand this game’s notations!

Graph of the history of databases

Airplane gently rocking its wings during whole flight

Is there such a thing as a proper verb, like a proper noun?

Players Circumventing the limitations of Wish

Could a dragon use its wings to swim?

Is it correct to say moon starry nights?

Is there a way to save my career from absolute disaster?

My ex-girlfriend uses my Apple ID to login to her iPad, do I have to give her my Apple ID password to reset it?

Purpose of level-shifter with same in and out voltages

Does higher Oxidation/ reduction potential translate to higher energy storage in battery?

How to get the last not-null value in an ordered column of a huge table?

How did Beeri the Hittite come up with naming his daughter Yehudit?

Spaces in which all closed sets are regular closed



What would happen if the UK refused to take part in EU Parliamentary elections?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow long does it take for a parliamentary government to hold unscheduled elections?If the UK government did not follow through with Brexit what would happen?Phenomenon where politically incorrect candidates do better in actual elections than in polls?What would happen if Donald Trump lost and refused to concede the election?Montana special House election: when will the winner take office?What method can be used to estimate the likelihood of a civil war?Why are the 2019 elections an objection to extending Article 50?Research on short election cycles influencing political choices?Why is participating in the European Parliamentary elections used as a threat?What would a revoked Brexit after the 2019 EU parliament elections mean for the European Parliament?










8















I've seen a lot in the news over the past couple of weeks about the UK having to take part in the EU Parliamentary elections, if they still haven't left the EU by 22 May. For example:




BBC Brussel's reporter Adam Fleming says: "The EU are absolutely
insistent that if the UK stays in the EU beyond 22 May then the UK has
to take part in the European Parliament elections.



"They are uncompromising about that."




Why would the UK have to take part? What would happen if the UK just flatly refused to participate in the elections?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Time4Tea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • The UK might not legally be allowed to take part as well as being legally required to take part. AFAIK the legislation required for holding EU elections has been revoked so AFAIK the required legislation would have to be introduced to parliament as new legislation and I'm guessing wouldn't have a hope in hell of passing through parliament in time

    – SpacePhoenix
    Mar 26 at 19:39















8















I've seen a lot in the news over the past couple of weeks about the UK having to take part in the EU Parliamentary elections, if they still haven't left the EU by 22 May. For example:




BBC Brussel's reporter Adam Fleming says: "The EU are absolutely
insistent that if the UK stays in the EU beyond 22 May then the UK has
to take part in the European Parliament elections.



"They are uncompromising about that."




Why would the UK have to take part? What would happen if the UK just flatly refused to participate in the elections?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Time4Tea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • The UK might not legally be allowed to take part as well as being legally required to take part. AFAIK the legislation required for holding EU elections has been revoked so AFAIK the required legislation would have to be introduced to parliament as new legislation and I'm guessing wouldn't have a hope in hell of passing through parliament in time

    – SpacePhoenix
    Mar 26 at 19:39













8












8








8


1






I've seen a lot in the news over the past couple of weeks about the UK having to take part in the EU Parliamentary elections, if they still haven't left the EU by 22 May. For example:




BBC Brussel's reporter Adam Fleming says: "The EU are absolutely
insistent that if the UK stays in the EU beyond 22 May then the UK has
to take part in the European Parliament elections.



"They are uncompromising about that."




Why would the UK have to take part? What would happen if the UK just flatly refused to participate in the elections?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Time4Tea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












I've seen a lot in the news over the past couple of weeks about the UK having to take part in the EU Parliamentary elections, if they still haven't left the EU by 22 May. For example:




BBC Brussel's reporter Adam Fleming says: "The EU are absolutely
insistent that if the UK stays in the EU beyond 22 May then the UK has
to take part in the European Parliament elections.



"They are uncompromising about that."




Why would the UK have to take part? What would happen if the UK just flatly refused to participate in the elections?







election european-union brexit






share|improve this question







New contributor




Time4Tea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Time4Tea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Time4Tea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Mar 26 at 13:04









Time4TeaTime4Tea

661414




661414




New contributor




Time4Tea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Time4Tea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Time4Tea is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • The UK might not legally be allowed to take part as well as being legally required to take part. AFAIK the legislation required for holding EU elections has been revoked so AFAIK the required legislation would have to be introduced to parliament as new legislation and I'm guessing wouldn't have a hope in hell of passing through parliament in time

    – SpacePhoenix
    Mar 26 at 19:39

















  • The UK might not legally be allowed to take part as well as being legally required to take part. AFAIK the legislation required for holding EU elections has been revoked so AFAIK the required legislation would have to be introduced to parliament as new legislation and I'm guessing wouldn't have a hope in hell of passing through parliament in time

    – SpacePhoenix
    Mar 26 at 19:39
















The UK might not legally be allowed to take part as well as being legally required to take part. AFAIK the legislation required for holding EU elections has been revoked so AFAIK the required legislation would have to be introduced to parliament as new legislation and I'm guessing wouldn't have a hope in hell of passing through parliament in time

– SpacePhoenix
Mar 26 at 19:39





The UK might not legally be allowed to take part as well as being legally required to take part. AFAIK the legislation required for holding EU elections has been revoked so AFAIK the required legislation would have to be introduced to parliament as new legislation and I'm guessing wouldn't have a hope in hell of passing through parliament in time

– SpacePhoenix
Mar 26 at 19:39










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















16














The EU has powers, granted by the treaties that all member states are party to, to sanction countries that fail to provide their citizens with a fair and free democracy. Refusing to participate in European elections, leaving UK citizens unrepresented and disrupting the operation of the European Parliament, would certainly count.



The matter would be taken up by the European Council, which is made up of member states' heads of state, including the British Prime Minister. Sanctions can include financial penalties, loss of privileges and benefits of membership, and legal action to try to force the issue.



There would also likely be legal action in the UK to force the government to participate, from citizens who were disenfranchised.






share|improve this answer


















  • 6





    "loss of privileges and benefits of membership" - in other words, the EU imposes a no-deal Brexit? I guess politicians don't to irony.

    – alephzero
    Mar 26 at 19:43






  • 10





    @alephzero no, the UK wouldn't have left the EU - it'd be a EU member with reduced powers under those circumstances. But again, that's a highly hypothetical circumstance that assumes the UK commits to breaking international treaties, which doesn't seem likely at the moment.

    – Cubic
    Mar 26 at 22:16











  • @Cubic: I wouldn't bet too much on the UK honoring all of its treaties much longer. Not that I'm advocating anything; it just looks ugly for the next few weeks.

    – Joshua
    Mar 26 at 23:08











  • @Cubic so it's Brexit with a backstop?

    – JAD
    Mar 27 at 8:12











  • @alephzero Interestingly, pretty well the only sanction they can't legally apply to a member state - is unilaterally revoking the membership.

    – Bilkokuya
    Mar 27 at 13:50


















8














Why?



Because if the UK is still an EU member by election day, then all UK voters and all EU citizens living in the UK have a right to partipate in the election. Refusing this right to the voters calls the legitimacy of the entire election into question.



Imagine an UK parliamentary election where Scotland refuses to take part.



What would happen?



If the UK are open about not participating, they don't get an extension beyond April 12th. It is not just the UK which must agree to a deal or an extension, the same applies to the EU27.



If the UK promise to hold elections and then renege, that would be a grave breach of trust. Article 7 would probably apply, but enacting that could be a blunt sword against someone who wants to leave anyway.






share|improve this answer























  • There's no need to "imagine" UK parliamentary elections where candidates openly state they will refuse to take their seats if elected. There are several of them who were elected on those terms, right now. There is no reason why a Scottish party couldn't use the same tactics as Sinn Fein, if they and their electors wanted to.

    – alephzero
    Mar 26 at 19:47







  • 20





    @alephzero Allowing people to vote for people who have made it clear they won't take their seats is very different from not allowing the people to vote at all.

    – Abigail
    Mar 26 at 19:55


















6














The way things currently look, they would most likely just be out of the European Union because they won't get an extension to beyond that point without participating in those elections.



If somehow they managed to stay in the European Union (for example by revoking their invocation of Article 50) and then refuse to participate in the elections, it's mostly just that they will lose a lot of political goodwill from the other members of the European Union. One would expect it is demanded the UK pay for the elections despite not participating. In addition, this will put them in a worse position in other negotiations (such as the Brexit negotiations) and if the member states feel strongly enough, they could impose other sanctions.



Basically, this is a situation that could go from bad to worse so fast that nobody wants to risk seeing how far the other is willing to go, therefore it doesn't happen.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Jasper is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • The scenario you paint: revoking Article 50 and refusing to hold elections for the European Parliament, would probably cause the EU to redesign the process of leaving the EU to prevent something like this from happening again.

    – Dohn Joe
    Mar 28 at 9:54


















4














The sticking point here was that the EC feared the UK might revoke article 50 at some point between the EU elections and when the new parliament sits, putting the legitimacy of the parliament in jeopardy. The agreed upon solution is to demand that the UK make up its mind on whether to participate or not in the next EU elections by April 12th, which is when the election period begins in full swing. In practical terms:



  • If these prerequisites of having a deal on the horizon aren't met by April 12th, then a no-deal Brexit occurs and your question is moot.


  • If the UK decides to leave by May 22nd the question is also moot.


  • If the UK decides to stay for longer by April 12th, it means it's committed to organizing EU elections -- and one would hope Article 7 doesn't need to get triggered for not doing so.






share|improve this answer
































    2















    Why would the UK have to take part?




    There are fears that if the UK remains in the EU but doesn't elect MEPs then any action taken by the European Parliament would be vulnerable to impugnation on the grounds that the Parliament was not legitimately composed.




    What would happen if the UK just flatly refused to participate in the elections?




    No-one knows for sure, and no-one wants to find out. That's why the UK has been told that any delay of Brexit beyond the date where it would need to start preparation of the elections is conditional upon that preparation.






    share|improve this answer























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "475"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );






      Time4Tea is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f39834%2fwhat-would-happen-if-the-uk-refused-to-take-part-in-eu-parliamentary-elections%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes








      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      16














      The EU has powers, granted by the treaties that all member states are party to, to sanction countries that fail to provide their citizens with a fair and free democracy. Refusing to participate in European elections, leaving UK citizens unrepresented and disrupting the operation of the European Parliament, would certainly count.



      The matter would be taken up by the European Council, which is made up of member states' heads of state, including the British Prime Minister. Sanctions can include financial penalties, loss of privileges and benefits of membership, and legal action to try to force the issue.



      There would also likely be legal action in the UK to force the government to participate, from citizens who were disenfranchised.






      share|improve this answer


















      • 6





        "loss of privileges and benefits of membership" - in other words, the EU imposes a no-deal Brexit? I guess politicians don't to irony.

        – alephzero
        Mar 26 at 19:43






      • 10





        @alephzero no, the UK wouldn't have left the EU - it'd be a EU member with reduced powers under those circumstances. But again, that's a highly hypothetical circumstance that assumes the UK commits to breaking international treaties, which doesn't seem likely at the moment.

        – Cubic
        Mar 26 at 22:16











      • @Cubic: I wouldn't bet too much on the UK honoring all of its treaties much longer. Not that I'm advocating anything; it just looks ugly for the next few weeks.

        – Joshua
        Mar 26 at 23:08











      • @Cubic so it's Brexit with a backstop?

        – JAD
        Mar 27 at 8:12











      • @alephzero Interestingly, pretty well the only sanction they can't legally apply to a member state - is unilaterally revoking the membership.

        – Bilkokuya
        Mar 27 at 13:50















      16














      The EU has powers, granted by the treaties that all member states are party to, to sanction countries that fail to provide their citizens with a fair and free democracy. Refusing to participate in European elections, leaving UK citizens unrepresented and disrupting the operation of the European Parliament, would certainly count.



      The matter would be taken up by the European Council, which is made up of member states' heads of state, including the British Prime Minister. Sanctions can include financial penalties, loss of privileges and benefits of membership, and legal action to try to force the issue.



      There would also likely be legal action in the UK to force the government to participate, from citizens who were disenfranchised.






      share|improve this answer


















      • 6





        "loss of privileges and benefits of membership" - in other words, the EU imposes a no-deal Brexit? I guess politicians don't to irony.

        – alephzero
        Mar 26 at 19:43






      • 10





        @alephzero no, the UK wouldn't have left the EU - it'd be a EU member with reduced powers under those circumstances. But again, that's a highly hypothetical circumstance that assumes the UK commits to breaking international treaties, which doesn't seem likely at the moment.

        – Cubic
        Mar 26 at 22:16











      • @Cubic: I wouldn't bet too much on the UK honoring all of its treaties much longer. Not that I'm advocating anything; it just looks ugly for the next few weeks.

        – Joshua
        Mar 26 at 23:08











      • @Cubic so it's Brexit with a backstop?

        – JAD
        Mar 27 at 8:12











      • @alephzero Interestingly, pretty well the only sanction they can't legally apply to a member state - is unilaterally revoking the membership.

        – Bilkokuya
        Mar 27 at 13:50













      16












      16








      16







      The EU has powers, granted by the treaties that all member states are party to, to sanction countries that fail to provide their citizens with a fair and free democracy. Refusing to participate in European elections, leaving UK citizens unrepresented and disrupting the operation of the European Parliament, would certainly count.



      The matter would be taken up by the European Council, which is made up of member states' heads of state, including the British Prime Minister. Sanctions can include financial penalties, loss of privileges and benefits of membership, and legal action to try to force the issue.



      There would also likely be legal action in the UK to force the government to participate, from citizens who were disenfranchised.






      share|improve this answer













      The EU has powers, granted by the treaties that all member states are party to, to sanction countries that fail to provide their citizens with a fair and free democracy. Refusing to participate in European elections, leaving UK citizens unrepresented and disrupting the operation of the European Parliament, would certainly count.



      The matter would be taken up by the European Council, which is made up of member states' heads of state, including the British Prime Minister. Sanctions can include financial penalties, loss of privileges and benefits of membership, and legal action to try to force the issue.



      There would also likely be legal action in the UK to force the government to participate, from citizens who were disenfranchised.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Mar 26 at 17:29









      useruser

      10.1k32240




      10.1k32240







      • 6





        "loss of privileges and benefits of membership" - in other words, the EU imposes a no-deal Brexit? I guess politicians don't to irony.

        – alephzero
        Mar 26 at 19:43






      • 10





        @alephzero no, the UK wouldn't have left the EU - it'd be a EU member with reduced powers under those circumstances. But again, that's a highly hypothetical circumstance that assumes the UK commits to breaking international treaties, which doesn't seem likely at the moment.

        – Cubic
        Mar 26 at 22:16











      • @Cubic: I wouldn't bet too much on the UK honoring all of its treaties much longer. Not that I'm advocating anything; it just looks ugly for the next few weeks.

        – Joshua
        Mar 26 at 23:08











      • @Cubic so it's Brexit with a backstop?

        – JAD
        Mar 27 at 8:12











      • @alephzero Interestingly, pretty well the only sanction they can't legally apply to a member state - is unilaterally revoking the membership.

        – Bilkokuya
        Mar 27 at 13:50












      • 6





        "loss of privileges and benefits of membership" - in other words, the EU imposes a no-deal Brexit? I guess politicians don't to irony.

        – alephzero
        Mar 26 at 19:43






      • 10





        @alephzero no, the UK wouldn't have left the EU - it'd be a EU member with reduced powers under those circumstances. But again, that's a highly hypothetical circumstance that assumes the UK commits to breaking international treaties, which doesn't seem likely at the moment.

        – Cubic
        Mar 26 at 22:16











      • @Cubic: I wouldn't bet too much on the UK honoring all of its treaties much longer. Not that I'm advocating anything; it just looks ugly for the next few weeks.

        – Joshua
        Mar 26 at 23:08











      • @Cubic so it's Brexit with a backstop?

        – JAD
        Mar 27 at 8:12











      • @alephzero Interestingly, pretty well the only sanction they can't legally apply to a member state - is unilaterally revoking the membership.

        – Bilkokuya
        Mar 27 at 13:50







      6




      6





      "loss of privileges and benefits of membership" - in other words, the EU imposes a no-deal Brexit? I guess politicians don't to irony.

      – alephzero
      Mar 26 at 19:43





      "loss of privileges and benefits of membership" - in other words, the EU imposes a no-deal Brexit? I guess politicians don't to irony.

      – alephzero
      Mar 26 at 19:43




      10




      10





      @alephzero no, the UK wouldn't have left the EU - it'd be a EU member with reduced powers under those circumstances. But again, that's a highly hypothetical circumstance that assumes the UK commits to breaking international treaties, which doesn't seem likely at the moment.

      – Cubic
      Mar 26 at 22:16





      @alephzero no, the UK wouldn't have left the EU - it'd be a EU member with reduced powers under those circumstances. But again, that's a highly hypothetical circumstance that assumes the UK commits to breaking international treaties, which doesn't seem likely at the moment.

      – Cubic
      Mar 26 at 22:16













      @Cubic: I wouldn't bet too much on the UK honoring all of its treaties much longer. Not that I'm advocating anything; it just looks ugly for the next few weeks.

      – Joshua
      Mar 26 at 23:08





      @Cubic: I wouldn't bet too much on the UK honoring all of its treaties much longer. Not that I'm advocating anything; it just looks ugly for the next few weeks.

      – Joshua
      Mar 26 at 23:08













      @Cubic so it's Brexit with a backstop?

      – JAD
      Mar 27 at 8:12





      @Cubic so it's Brexit with a backstop?

      – JAD
      Mar 27 at 8:12













      @alephzero Interestingly, pretty well the only sanction they can't legally apply to a member state - is unilaterally revoking the membership.

      – Bilkokuya
      Mar 27 at 13:50





      @alephzero Interestingly, pretty well the only sanction they can't legally apply to a member state - is unilaterally revoking the membership.

      – Bilkokuya
      Mar 27 at 13:50











      8














      Why?



      Because if the UK is still an EU member by election day, then all UK voters and all EU citizens living in the UK have a right to partipate in the election. Refusing this right to the voters calls the legitimacy of the entire election into question.



      Imagine an UK parliamentary election where Scotland refuses to take part.



      What would happen?



      If the UK are open about not participating, they don't get an extension beyond April 12th. It is not just the UK which must agree to a deal or an extension, the same applies to the EU27.



      If the UK promise to hold elections and then renege, that would be a grave breach of trust. Article 7 would probably apply, but enacting that could be a blunt sword against someone who wants to leave anyway.






      share|improve this answer























      • There's no need to "imagine" UK parliamentary elections where candidates openly state they will refuse to take their seats if elected. There are several of them who were elected on those terms, right now. There is no reason why a Scottish party couldn't use the same tactics as Sinn Fein, if they and their electors wanted to.

        – alephzero
        Mar 26 at 19:47







      • 20





        @alephzero Allowing people to vote for people who have made it clear they won't take their seats is very different from not allowing the people to vote at all.

        – Abigail
        Mar 26 at 19:55















      8














      Why?



      Because if the UK is still an EU member by election day, then all UK voters and all EU citizens living in the UK have a right to partipate in the election. Refusing this right to the voters calls the legitimacy of the entire election into question.



      Imagine an UK parliamentary election where Scotland refuses to take part.



      What would happen?



      If the UK are open about not participating, they don't get an extension beyond April 12th. It is not just the UK which must agree to a deal or an extension, the same applies to the EU27.



      If the UK promise to hold elections and then renege, that would be a grave breach of trust. Article 7 would probably apply, but enacting that could be a blunt sword against someone who wants to leave anyway.






      share|improve this answer























      • There's no need to "imagine" UK parliamentary elections where candidates openly state they will refuse to take their seats if elected. There are several of them who were elected on those terms, right now. There is no reason why a Scottish party couldn't use the same tactics as Sinn Fein, if they and their electors wanted to.

        – alephzero
        Mar 26 at 19:47







      • 20





        @alephzero Allowing people to vote for people who have made it clear they won't take their seats is very different from not allowing the people to vote at all.

        – Abigail
        Mar 26 at 19:55













      8












      8








      8







      Why?



      Because if the UK is still an EU member by election day, then all UK voters and all EU citizens living in the UK have a right to partipate in the election. Refusing this right to the voters calls the legitimacy of the entire election into question.



      Imagine an UK parliamentary election where Scotland refuses to take part.



      What would happen?



      If the UK are open about not participating, they don't get an extension beyond April 12th. It is not just the UK which must agree to a deal or an extension, the same applies to the EU27.



      If the UK promise to hold elections and then renege, that would be a grave breach of trust. Article 7 would probably apply, but enacting that could be a blunt sword against someone who wants to leave anyway.






      share|improve this answer













      Why?



      Because if the UK is still an EU member by election day, then all UK voters and all EU citizens living in the UK have a right to partipate in the election. Refusing this right to the voters calls the legitimacy of the entire election into question.



      Imagine an UK parliamentary election where Scotland refuses to take part.



      What would happen?



      If the UK are open about not participating, they don't get an extension beyond April 12th. It is not just the UK which must agree to a deal or an extension, the same applies to the EU27.



      If the UK promise to hold elections and then renege, that would be a grave breach of trust. Article 7 would probably apply, but enacting that could be a blunt sword against someone who wants to leave anyway.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Mar 26 at 17:09









      o.m.o.m.

      10.5k11943




      10.5k11943












      • There's no need to "imagine" UK parliamentary elections where candidates openly state they will refuse to take their seats if elected. There are several of them who were elected on those terms, right now. There is no reason why a Scottish party couldn't use the same tactics as Sinn Fein, if they and their electors wanted to.

        – alephzero
        Mar 26 at 19:47







      • 20





        @alephzero Allowing people to vote for people who have made it clear they won't take their seats is very different from not allowing the people to vote at all.

        – Abigail
        Mar 26 at 19:55

















      • There's no need to "imagine" UK parliamentary elections where candidates openly state they will refuse to take their seats if elected. There are several of them who were elected on those terms, right now. There is no reason why a Scottish party couldn't use the same tactics as Sinn Fein, if they and their electors wanted to.

        – alephzero
        Mar 26 at 19:47







      • 20





        @alephzero Allowing people to vote for people who have made it clear they won't take their seats is very different from not allowing the people to vote at all.

        – Abigail
        Mar 26 at 19:55
















      There's no need to "imagine" UK parliamentary elections where candidates openly state they will refuse to take their seats if elected. There are several of them who were elected on those terms, right now. There is no reason why a Scottish party couldn't use the same tactics as Sinn Fein, if they and their electors wanted to.

      – alephzero
      Mar 26 at 19:47






      There's no need to "imagine" UK parliamentary elections where candidates openly state they will refuse to take their seats if elected. There are several of them who were elected on those terms, right now. There is no reason why a Scottish party couldn't use the same tactics as Sinn Fein, if they and their electors wanted to.

      – alephzero
      Mar 26 at 19:47





      20




      20





      @alephzero Allowing people to vote for people who have made it clear they won't take their seats is very different from not allowing the people to vote at all.

      – Abigail
      Mar 26 at 19:55





      @alephzero Allowing people to vote for people who have made it clear they won't take their seats is very different from not allowing the people to vote at all.

      – Abigail
      Mar 26 at 19:55











      6














      The way things currently look, they would most likely just be out of the European Union because they won't get an extension to beyond that point without participating in those elections.



      If somehow they managed to stay in the European Union (for example by revoking their invocation of Article 50) and then refuse to participate in the elections, it's mostly just that they will lose a lot of political goodwill from the other members of the European Union. One would expect it is demanded the UK pay for the elections despite not participating. In addition, this will put them in a worse position in other negotiations (such as the Brexit negotiations) and if the member states feel strongly enough, they could impose other sanctions.



      Basically, this is a situation that could go from bad to worse so fast that nobody wants to risk seeing how far the other is willing to go, therefore it doesn't happen.






      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      Jasper is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















      • The scenario you paint: revoking Article 50 and refusing to hold elections for the European Parliament, would probably cause the EU to redesign the process of leaving the EU to prevent something like this from happening again.

        – Dohn Joe
        Mar 28 at 9:54















      6














      The way things currently look, they would most likely just be out of the European Union because they won't get an extension to beyond that point without participating in those elections.



      If somehow they managed to stay in the European Union (for example by revoking their invocation of Article 50) and then refuse to participate in the elections, it's mostly just that they will lose a lot of political goodwill from the other members of the European Union. One would expect it is demanded the UK pay for the elections despite not participating. In addition, this will put them in a worse position in other negotiations (such as the Brexit negotiations) and if the member states feel strongly enough, they could impose other sanctions.



      Basically, this is a situation that could go from bad to worse so fast that nobody wants to risk seeing how far the other is willing to go, therefore it doesn't happen.






      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      Jasper is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















      • The scenario you paint: revoking Article 50 and refusing to hold elections for the European Parliament, would probably cause the EU to redesign the process of leaving the EU to prevent something like this from happening again.

        – Dohn Joe
        Mar 28 at 9:54













      6












      6








      6







      The way things currently look, they would most likely just be out of the European Union because they won't get an extension to beyond that point without participating in those elections.



      If somehow they managed to stay in the European Union (for example by revoking their invocation of Article 50) and then refuse to participate in the elections, it's mostly just that they will lose a lot of political goodwill from the other members of the European Union. One would expect it is demanded the UK pay for the elections despite not participating. In addition, this will put them in a worse position in other negotiations (such as the Brexit negotiations) and if the member states feel strongly enough, they could impose other sanctions.



      Basically, this is a situation that could go from bad to worse so fast that nobody wants to risk seeing how far the other is willing to go, therefore it doesn't happen.






      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      Jasper is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.










      The way things currently look, they would most likely just be out of the European Union because they won't get an extension to beyond that point without participating in those elections.



      If somehow they managed to stay in the European Union (for example by revoking their invocation of Article 50) and then refuse to participate in the elections, it's mostly just that they will lose a lot of political goodwill from the other members of the European Union. One would expect it is demanded the UK pay for the elections despite not participating. In addition, this will put them in a worse position in other negotiations (such as the Brexit negotiations) and if the member states feel strongly enough, they could impose other sanctions.



      Basically, this is a situation that could go from bad to worse so fast that nobody wants to risk seeing how far the other is willing to go, therefore it doesn't happen.







      share|improve this answer










      New contributor




      Jasper is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Mar 26 at 23:40





















      New contributor




      Jasper is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      answered Mar 26 at 13:39









      JasperJasper

      1833




      1833




      New contributor




      Jasper is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Jasper is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Jasper is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      • The scenario you paint: revoking Article 50 and refusing to hold elections for the European Parliament, would probably cause the EU to redesign the process of leaving the EU to prevent something like this from happening again.

        – Dohn Joe
        Mar 28 at 9:54

















      • The scenario you paint: revoking Article 50 and refusing to hold elections for the European Parliament, would probably cause the EU to redesign the process of leaving the EU to prevent something like this from happening again.

        – Dohn Joe
        Mar 28 at 9:54
















      The scenario you paint: revoking Article 50 and refusing to hold elections for the European Parliament, would probably cause the EU to redesign the process of leaving the EU to prevent something like this from happening again.

      – Dohn Joe
      Mar 28 at 9:54





      The scenario you paint: revoking Article 50 and refusing to hold elections for the European Parliament, would probably cause the EU to redesign the process of leaving the EU to prevent something like this from happening again.

      – Dohn Joe
      Mar 28 at 9:54











      4














      The sticking point here was that the EC feared the UK might revoke article 50 at some point between the EU elections and when the new parliament sits, putting the legitimacy of the parliament in jeopardy. The agreed upon solution is to demand that the UK make up its mind on whether to participate or not in the next EU elections by April 12th, which is when the election period begins in full swing. In practical terms:



      • If these prerequisites of having a deal on the horizon aren't met by April 12th, then a no-deal Brexit occurs and your question is moot.


      • If the UK decides to leave by May 22nd the question is also moot.


      • If the UK decides to stay for longer by April 12th, it means it's committed to organizing EU elections -- and one would hope Article 7 doesn't need to get triggered for not doing so.






      share|improve this answer





























        4














        The sticking point here was that the EC feared the UK might revoke article 50 at some point between the EU elections and when the new parliament sits, putting the legitimacy of the parliament in jeopardy. The agreed upon solution is to demand that the UK make up its mind on whether to participate or not in the next EU elections by April 12th, which is when the election period begins in full swing. In practical terms:



        • If these prerequisites of having a deal on the horizon aren't met by April 12th, then a no-deal Brexit occurs and your question is moot.


        • If the UK decides to leave by May 22nd the question is also moot.


        • If the UK decides to stay for longer by April 12th, it means it's committed to organizing EU elections -- and one would hope Article 7 doesn't need to get triggered for not doing so.






        share|improve this answer



























          4












          4








          4







          The sticking point here was that the EC feared the UK might revoke article 50 at some point between the EU elections and when the new parliament sits, putting the legitimacy of the parliament in jeopardy. The agreed upon solution is to demand that the UK make up its mind on whether to participate or not in the next EU elections by April 12th, which is when the election period begins in full swing. In practical terms:



          • If these prerequisites of having a deal on the horizon aren't met by April 12th, then a no-deal Brexit occurs and your question is moot.


          • If the UK decides to leave by May 22nd the question is also moot.


          • If the UK decides to stay for longer by April 12th, it means it's committed to organizing EU elections -- and one would hope Article 7 doesn't need to get triggered for not doing so.






          share|improve this answer















          The sticking point here was that the EC feared the UK might revoke article 50 at some point between the EU elections and when the new parliament sits, putting the legitimacy of the parliament in jeopardy. The agreed upon solution is to demand that the UK make up its mind on whether to participate or not in the next EU elections by April 12th, which is when the election period begins in full swing. In practical terms:



          • If these prerequisites of having a deal on the horizon aren't met by April 12th, then a no-deal Brexit occurs and your question is moot.


          • If the UK decides to leave by May 22nd the question is also moot.


          • If the UK decides to stay for longer by April 12th, it means it's committed to organizing EU elections -- and one would hope Article 7 doesn't need to get triggered for not doing so.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Mar 26 at 21:35

























          answered Mar 26 at 19:14









          Denis de BernardyDenis de Bernardy

          13.9k33860




          13.9k33860





















              2















              Why would the UK have to take part?




              There are fears that if the UK remains in the EU but doesn't elect MEPs then any action taken by the European Parliament would be vulnerable to impugnation on the grounds that the Parliament was not legitimately composed.




              What would happen if the UK just flatly refused to participate in the elections?




              No-one knows for sure, and no-one wants to find out. That's why the UK has been told that any delay of Brexit beyond the date where it would need to start preparation of the elections is conditional upon that preparation.






              share|improve this answer



























                2















                Why would the UK have to take part?




                There are fears that if the UK remains in the EU but doesn't elect MEPs then any action taken by the European Parliament would be vulnerable to impugnation on the grounds that the Parliament was not legitimately composed.




                What would happen if the UK just flatly refused to participate in the elections?




                No-one knows for sure, and no-one wants to find out. That's why the UK has been told that any delay of Brexit beyond the date where it would need to start preparation of the elections is conditional upon that preparation.






                share|improve this answer

























                  2












                  2








                  2








                  Why would the UK have to take part?




                  There are fears that if the UK remains in the EU but doesn't elect MEPs then any action taken by the European Parliament would be vulnerable to impugnation on the grounds that the Parliament was not legitimately composed.




                  What would happen if the UK just flatly refused to participate in the elections?




                  No-one knows for sure, and no-one wants to find out. That's why the UK has been told that any delay of Brexit beyond the date where it would need to start preparation of the elections is conditional upon that preparation.






                  share|improve this answer














                  Why would the UK have to take part?




                  There are fears that if the UK remains in the EU but doesn't elect MEPs then any action taken by the European Parliament would be vulnerable to impugnation on the grounds that the Parliament was not legitimately composed.




                  What would happen if the UK just flatly refused to participate in the elections?




                  No-one knows for sure, and no-one wants to find out. That's why the UK has been told that any delay of Brexit beyond the date where it would need to start preparation of the elections is conditional upon that preparation.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Mar 27 at 14:39









                  Peter TaylorPeter Taylor

                  2,373817




                  2,373817




















                      Time4Tea is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      Time4Tea is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      Time4Tea is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                      Time4Tea is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Politics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f39834%2fwhat-would-happen-if-the-uk-refused-to-take-part-in-eu-parliamentary-elections%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Adding axes to figuresAdding axes labels to LaTeX figuresLaTeX equivalent of ConTeXt buffersRotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?adding axes to shapesAlign axes across subfiguresAdding figures with a certain orderLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themAdding axes labels to LaTeX figures

                      Tähtien Talli Jäsenet | Lähteet | NavigointivalikkoSuomen Hippos – Tähtien Talli

                      Do these cracks on my tires look bad? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowDry rot tire should I replace?Having to replace tiresFishtailed so easily? Bad tires? ABS?Filling the tires with something other than air, to avoid puncture hassles?Used Michelin tires safe to install?Do these tyre cracks necessitate replacement?Rumbling noise: tires or mechanicalIs it possible to fix noisy feathered tires?Are bad winter tires still better than summer tires in winter?Torque converter failure - Related to replacing only 2 tires?Why use snow tires on all 4 wheels on 2-wheel-drive cars?