Are objects structures and/or vice versa?Are cave walls considered objects for the purpose of spells - and how much of one?How can I keep Darkness on a monsterCan a Shadow Dragon become a Dracolich or vice versa?Can radiant damage destroy objects?Do Devils leverage demons and vice versa?Can you attack from inside Rope Trick and vice versa?Are you considered to be wearing/carrying a restraining net/rope/etc. for the purpose of fire based spells?Can Catapult be used on Delayed Blast Fireball?Can you leave objects behind in the ethereal plane?How does Shatter damage objects, if objects are immune to con-save effects?For a multiclassed cleric/wizard, can cleric class features be applied to my wizard spells, and vice versa?
What's the polite way to say "I need to urinate"?
Why does Bran Stark feel that Jon Snow "needs to know" about his lineage?
Pressure to defend the relevance of one's area of mathematics
How can Republicans who favour free markets, consistently express anger when they don't like the outcome of that choice?
Transfer over $10k
Morally unwholesome deeds knowing the consequences but without unwholesome intentions
Why does processed meat contain preservatives, while canned fish needs not?
Lock in SQL Server and Oracle
How to replace the "space symbol" (squat-u) in listings?
Is it possible to measure lightning discharges as Nikola Tesla?
Volunteering in England
Why is the origin of “threshold” uncertain?
Subtleties of choosing the sequence of tenses in Russian
Colliding particles and Activation energy
Asahi Dry Black beer can
Do I have an "anti-research" personality?
Why do Ichisongas hate elephants and hippos?
What is the difference between `a[bc]d` (brackets) and `ab,cd` (braces)?
If Earth is tilted, why is Polaris always above the same spot?
Feels like I am getting dragged in office politics
Confusion about capacitors
How to determine the actual or "true" resolution of a digital photograph?
Was it really necessary for the Lunar Module to have 2 stages?
How to set printing options as reverse order as default on 18.04
Are objects structures and/or vice versa?
Are cave walls considered objects for the purpose of spells - and how much of one?How can I keep Darkness on a monsterCan a Shadow Dragon become a Dracolich or vice versa?Can radiant damage destroy objects?Do Devils leverage demons and vice versa?Can you attack from inside Rope Trick and vice versa?Are you considered to be wearing/carrying a restraining net/rope/etc. for the purpose of fire based spells?Can Catapult be used on Delayed Blast Fireball?Can you leave objects behind in the ethereal plane?How does Shatter damage objects, if objects are immune to con-save effects?For a multiclassed cleric/wizard, can cleric class features be applied to my wizard spells, and vice versa?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
An interesting issue came up in a game we were playing recently: Our party was on an airship and attacked by flying young dragons. My sorcerer cast a spell that triggered a wild magic surge and rolled a self-centered fireball (at 20,000 feet, whee!).
Here's the issue. Fireball says:
The fire spreads around corners. It ignites flammable objects in the area that aren't being worn or carried.
I've noticed that certain monsters have the "Siege Monster" feature which says:
Siege Monster. The [monster] deals double damage to objects and structures.
This suggests that objects and structures are legally different things and therefore Fireball would ignite an object but not a structure.
But then, perhaps a structure is a type of object? What is the nature/relationship of these two classifications of entities?
(For what it's worth, we ruled that the rope rigging was flammable because rope appears on the gear item table).
dnd-5e objects
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
An interesting issue came up in a game we were playing recently: Our party was on an airship and attacked by flying young dragons. My sorcerer cast a spell that triggered a wild magic surge and rolled a self-centered fireball (at 20,000 feet, whee!).
Here's the issue. Fireball says:
The fire spreads around corners. It ignites flammable objects in the area that aren't being worn or carried.
I've noticed that certain monsters have the "Siege Monster" feature which says:
Siege Monster. The [monster] deals double damage to objects and structures.
This suggests that objects and structures are legally different things and therefore Fireball would ignite an object but not a structure.
But then, perhaps a structure is a type of object? What is the nature/relationship of these two classifications of entities?
(For what it's worth, we ruled that the rope rigging was flammable because rope appears on the gear item table).
dnd-5e objects
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Related to, but not a duplicate of, this question
$endgroup$
– Mwr247
Apr 8 at 17:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
An interesting issue came up in a game we were playing recently: Our party was on an airship and attacked by flying young dragons. My sorcerer cast a spell that triggered a wild magic surge and rolled a self-centered fireball (at 20,000 feet, whee!).
Here's the issue. Fireball says:
The fire spreads around corners. It ignites flammable objects in the area that aren't being worn or carried.
I've noticed that certain monsters have the "Siege Monster" feature which says:
Siege Monster. The [monster] deals double damage to objects and structures.
This suggests that objects and structures are legally different things and therefore Fireball would ignite an object but not a structure.
But then, perhaps a structure is a type of object? What is the nature/relationship of these two classifications of entities?
(For what it's worth, we ruled that the rope rigging was flammable because rope appears on the gear item table).
dnd-5e objects
$endgroup$
An interesting issue came up in a game we were playing recently: Our party was on an airship and attacked by flying young dragons. My sorcerer cast a spell that triggered a wild magic surge and rolled a self-centered fireball (at 20,000 feet, whee!).
Here's the issue. Fireball says:
The fire spreads around corners. It ignites flammable objects in the area that aren't being worn or carried.
I've noticed that certain monsters have the "Siege Monster" feature which says:
Siege Monster. The [monster] deals double damage to objects and structures.
This suggests that objects and structures are legally different things and therefore Fireball would ignite an object but not a structure.
But then, perhaps a structure is a type of object? What is the nature/relationship of these two classifications of entities?
(For what it's worth, we ruled that the rope rigging was flammable because rope appears on the gear item table).
dnd-5e objects
dnd-5e objects
edited Apr 8 at 22:03
V2Blast
28.1k5101171
28.1k5101171
asked Apr 8 at 17:03
RykaraRykara
6,1091849
6,1091849
$begingroup$
Related to, but not a duplicate of, this question
$endgroup$
– Mwr247
Apr 8 at 17:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Related to, but not a duplicate of, this question
$endgroup$
– Mwr247
Apr 8 at 17:05
$begingroup$
Related to, but not a duplicate of, this question
$endgroup$
– Mwr247
Apr 8 at 17:05
$begingroup$
Related to, but not a duplicate of, this question
$endgroup$
– Mwr247
Apr 8 at 17:05
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
A structure is not an object, but is made of objects
From page 246 of the DMG and the basic rules:
For the purpose of these rules, an object is a discrete, inanimate item like a window, door, sword, book, table, chair, or stone, not a building or a vehicle that is composed of many other objects.
Lacking a definition from the source books, a "structure" is defined by its common English definition, which would be:
the arrangement of and relations between the parts or elements of something complex.
Thus a structure might be considered to be "a building or a vehicle that is composed of many other objects".
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You probably didn't even need to go with the common english. The object rules call out vehicle or building separately. But +1 anyway :)
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Apr 8 at 17:13
1
$begingroup$
@NautArch Agreed, but the object rules don't specifically state buildings or vehicles as structures. I wanted to solidify the assertion that 5e itself doesn't define what a structure is, and so we can fall back on the common definition to reach that conclusion with certainty.
$endgroup$
– Mwr247
Apr 8 at 17:16
3
$begingroup$
It might be worth pointing out that common sense would indicate that a burning object could certainly eventually set fire to a structure (GM adjudication, of course). I don't think this sort of thing needs to be made explicit within the rules themselves, though.
$endgroup$
– keithcurtis
Apr 8 at 17:19
1
$begingroup$
"Is made of objects" that jibes with our table-side ruling of the rope rigging being flammable but not the deck planking.
$endgroup$
– Rykara
Apr 8 at 17:59
$begingroup$
A DM could rule the structures to be combustible, meaning that when exposed to enough heat and time then it would start to burn. So a fireball would not start an airship on fire, but flammable objects on the airship left to burn could eventually ignite the ship.
$endgroup$
– Alk
Apr 17 at 23:52
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144804%2fare-objects-structures-and-or-vice-versa%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
A structure is not an object, but is made of objects
From page 246 of the DMG and the basic rules:
For the purpose of these rules, an object is a discrete, inanimate item like a window, door, sword, book, table, chair, or stone, not a building or a vehicle that is composed of many other objects.
Lacking a definition from the source books, a "structure" is defined by its common English definition, which would be:
the arrangement of and relations between the parts or elements of something complex.
Thus a structure might be considered to be "a building or a vehicle that is composed of many other objects".
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You probably didn't even need to go with the common english. The object rules call out vehicle or building separately. But +1 anyway :)
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Apr 8 at 17:13
1
$begingroup$
@NautArch Agreed, but the object rules don't specifically state buildings or vehicles as structures. I wanted to solidify the assertion that 5e itself doesn't define what a structure is, and so we can fall back on the common definition to reach that conclusion with certainty.
$endgroup$
– Mwr247
Apr 8 at 17:16
3
$begingroup$
It might be worth pointing out that common sense would indicate that a burning object could certainly eventually set fire to a structure (GM adjudication, of course). I don't think this sort of thing needs to be made explicit within the rules themselves, though.
$endgroup$
– keithcurtis
Apr 8 at 17:19
1
$begingroup$
"Is made of objects" that jibes with our table-side ruling of the rope rigging being flammable but not the deck planking.
$endgroup$
– Rykara
Apr 8 at 17:59
$begingroup$
A DM could rule the structures to be combustible, meaning that when exposed to enough heat and time then it would start to burn. So a fireball would not start an airship on fire, but flammable objects on the airship left to burn could eventually ignite the ship.
$endgroup$
– Alk
Apr 17 at 23:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A structure is not an object, but is made of objects
From page 246 of the DMG and the basic rules:
For the purpose of these rules, an object is a discrete, inanimate item like a window, door, sword, book, table, chair, or stone, not a building or a vehicle that is composed of many other objects.
Lacking a definition from the source books, a "structure" is defined by its common English definition, which would be:
the arrangement of and relations between the parts or elements of something complex.
Thus a structure might be considered to be "a building or a vehicle that is composed of many other objects".
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
You probably didn't even need to go with the common english. The object rules call out vehicle or building separately. But +1 anyway :)
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Apr 8 at 17:13
1
$begingroup$
@NautArch Agreed, but the object rules don't specifically state buildings or vehicles as structures. I wanted to solidify the assertion that 5e itself doesn't define what a structure is, and so we can fall back on the common definition to reach that conclusion with certainty.
$endgroup$
– Mwr247
Apr 8 at 17:16
3
$begingroup$
It might be worth pointing out that common sense would indicate that a burning object could certainly eventually set fire to a structure (GM adjudication, of course). I don't think this sort of thing needs to be made explicit within the rules themselves, though.
$endgroup$
– keithcurtis
Apr 8 at 17:19
1
$begingroup$
"Is made of objects" that jibes with our table-side ruling of the rope rigging being flammable but not the deck planking.
$endgroup$
– Rykara
Apr 8 at 17:59
$begingroup$
A DM could rule the structures to be combustible, meaning that when exposed to enough heat and time then it would start to burn. So a fireball would not start an airship on fire, but flammable objects on the airship left to burn could eventually ignite the ship.
$endgroup$
– Alk
Apr 17 at 23:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A structure is not an object, but is made of objects
From page 246 of the DMG and the basic rules:
For the purpose of these rules, an object is a discrete, inanimate item like a window, door, sword, book, table, chair, or stone, not a building or a vehicle that is composed of many other objects.
Lacking a definition from the source books, a "structure" is defined by its common English definition, which would be:
the arrangement of and relations between the parts or elements of something complex.
Thus a structure might be considered to be "a building or a vehicle that is composed of many other objects".
$endgroup$
A structure is not an object, but is made of objects
From page 246 of the DMG and the basic rules:
For the purpose of these rules, an object is a discrete, inanimate item like a window, door, sword, book, table, chair, or stone, not a building or a vehicle that is composed of many other objects.
Lacking a definition from the source books, a "structure" is defined by its common English definition, which would be:
the arrangement of and relations between the parts or elements of something complex.
Thus a structure might be considered to be "a building or a vehicle that is composed of many other objects".
edited Apr 8 at 18:48
PixelMaster
13.5k351123
13.5k351123
answered Apr 8 at 17:09
Mwr247Mwr247
3,0041727
3,0041727
1
$begingroup$
You probably didn't even need to go with the common english. The object rules call out vehicle or building separately. But +1 anyway :)
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Apr 8 at 17:13
1
$begingroup$
@NautArch Agreed, but the object rules don't specifically state buildings or vehicles as structures. I wanted to solidify the assertion that 5e itself doesn't define what a structure is, and so we can fall back on the common definition to reach that conclusion with certainty.
$endgroup$
– Mwr247
Apr 8 at 17:16
3
$begingroup$
It might be worth pointing out that common sense would indicate that a burning object could certainly eventually set fire to a structure (GM adjudication, of course). I don't think this sort of thing needs to be made explicit within the rules themselves, though.
$endgroup$
– keithcurtis
Apr 8 at 17:19
1
$begingroup$
"Is made of objects" that jibes with our table-side ruling of the rope rigging being flammable but not the deck planking.
$endgroup$
– Rykara
Apr 8 at 17:59
$begingroup$
A DM could rule the structures to be combustible, meaning that when exposed to enough heat and time then it would start to burn. So a fireball would not start an airship on fire, but flammable objects on the airship left to burn could eventually ignite the ship.
$endgroup$
– Alk
Apr 17 at 23:52
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
You probably didn't even need to go with the common english. The object rules call out vehicle or building separately. But +1 anyway :)
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Apr 8 at 17:13
1
$begingroup$
@NautArch Agreed, but the object rules don't specifically state buildings or vehicles as structures. I wanted to solidify the assertion that 5e itself doesn't define what a structure is, and so we can fall back on the common definition to reach that conclusion with certainty.
$endgroup$
– Mwr247
Apr 8 at 17:16
3
$begingroup$
It might be worth pointing out that common sense would indicate that a burning object could certainly eventually set fire to a structure (GM adjudication, of course). I don't think this sort of thing needs to be made explicit within the rules themselves, though.
$endgroup$
– keithcurtis
Apr 8 at 17:19
1
$begingroup$
"Is made of objects" that jibes with our table-side ruling of the rope rigging being flammable but not the deck planking.
$endgroup$
– Rykara
Apr 8 at 17:59
$begingroup$
A DM could rule the structures to be combustible, meaning that when exposed to enough heat and time then it would start to burn. So a fireball would not start an airship on fire, but flammable objects on the airship left to burn could eventually ignite the ship.
$endgroup$
– Alk
Apr 17 at 23:52
1
1
$begingroup$
You probably didn't even need to go with the common english. The object rules call out vehicle or building separately. But +1 anyway :)
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Apr 8 at 17:13
$begingroup$
You probably didn't even need to go with the common english. The object rules call out vehicle or building separately. But +1 anyway :)
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Apr 8 at 17:13
1
1
$begingroup$
@NautArch Agreed, but the object rules don't specifically state buildings or vehicles as structures. I wanted to solidify the assertion that 5e itself doesn't define what a structure is, and so we can fall back on the common definition to reach that conclusion with certainty.
$endgroup$
– Mwr247
Apr 8 at 17:16
$begingroup$
@NautArch Agreed, but the object rules don't specifically state buildings or vehicles as structures. I wanted to solidify the assertion that 5e itself doesn't define what a structure is, and so we can fall back on the common definition to reach that conclusion with certainty.
$endgroup$
– Mwr247
Apr 8 at 17:16
3
3
$begingroup$
It might be worth pointing out that common sense would indicate that a burning object could certainly eventually set fire to a structure (GM adjudication, of course). I don't think this sort of thing needs to be made explicit within the rules themselves, though.
$endgroup$
– keithcurtis
Apr 8 at 17:19
$begingroup$
It might be worth pointing out that common sense would indicate that a burning object could certainly eventually set fire to a structure (GM adjudication, of course). I don't think this sort of thing needs to be made explicit within the rules themselves, though.
$endgroup$
– keithcurtis
Apr 8 at 17:19
1
1
$begingroup$
"Is made of objects" that jibes with our table-side ruling of the rope rigging being flammable but not the deck planking.
$endgroup$
– Rykara
Apr 8 at 17:59
$begingroup$
"Is made of objects" that jibes with our table-side ruling of the rope rigging being flammable but not the deck planking.
$endgroup$
– Rykara
Apr 8 at 17:59
$begingroup$
A DM could rule the structures to be combustible, meaning that when exposed to enough heat and time then it would start to burn. So a fireball would not start an airship on fire, but flammable objects on the airship left to burn could eventually ignite the ship.
$endgroup$
– Alk
Apr 17 at 23:52
$begingroup$
A DM could rule the structures to be combustible, meaning that when exposed to enough heat and time then it would start to burn. So a fireball would not start an airship on fire, but flammable objects on the airship left to burn could eventually ignite the ship.
$endgroup$
– Alk
Apr 17 at 23:52
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144804%2fare-objects-structures-and-or-vice-versa%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Related to, but not a duplicate of, this question
$endgroup$
– Mwr247
Apr 8 at 17:05