Asymptotics of orbits on graphs Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Growth rate of number of loops in a graphAsymptotics for forbidden subwords“Antipodal” maps on regular graphs?Average squared distance in $k$-regular graphsA question about expander graphsFinite vertex-transitive graphs that look like infinite vertex-transitive graphsLovász conjecture and 2-connected graphsHamming representability of finite graphsGraphs formed of vertices of distance $2$Reference on graphs such that contracting 2 non-adjacent vertices increases the Hadwiger number

Asymptotics of orbits on graphs



Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Growth rate of number of loops in a graphAsymptotics for forbidden subwords“Antipodal” maps on regular graphs?Average squared distance in $k$-regular graphsA question about expander graphsFinite vertex-transitive graphs that look like infinite vertex-transitive graphsLovász conjecture and 2-connected graphsHamming representability of finite graphsGraphs formed of vertices of distance $2$Reference on graphs such that contracting 2 non-adjacent vertices increases the Hadwiger number










4












$begingroup$


Let $X$ be a connected, locally finite graph with vertex set $V(X)$ and $G$ a group acting freely on $X$ such that $X/G$ is a finite graph. Fix a vertex $x$ and for $kinmathbb N$ set
$$
N(k)=# gin G: d(gx,x)le k,
$$

where $d$ is the vertex distance in the graph $X$.
Further set
$$
A(k)=#yin V(X):d(x,y)le k.
$$

Is it true that, as $ktoinfty$, the number $N(k)/A(k)$ tends to $#V(X/G)^-1$? If so, what error term estimates are known?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Very interesting! Can you please add the reference or the source of inspiration for this problem?
    $endgroup$
    – SeF
    Apr 4 at 8:50










  • $begingroup$
    It's kind of a graph analogue of lattice point counting.
    $endgroup$
    – Zero
    Apr 4 at 9:04










  • $begingroup$
    "The theory of lattices in automorphism groups of trees. The theory of tree lattices was developed by Bass, Kulkarni and Lubotzky[25][26] by analogy with the theory of lattices in Lie groups (that is discrete subgroups of Lie groups of finite co-volume). For a discrete subgroup G of the automorphism group of a locally finite tree X one can define a natural notion of volume for the quotient graph of groups A as $vol(A) = sum_v in V frac1lvert A_v rvert$" - wiki on Bass-Serre theory
    $endgroup$
    – i9Fn
    Apr 6 at 9:41















4












$begingroup$


Let $X$ be a connected, locally finite graph with vertex set $V(X)$ and $G$ a group acting freely on $X$ such that $X/G$ is a finite graph. Fix a vertex $x$ and for $kinmathbb N$ set
$$
N(k)=# gin G: d(gx,x)le k,
$$

where $d$ is the vertex distance in the graph $X$.
Further set
$$
A(k)=#yin V(X):d(x,y)le k.
$$

Is it true that, as $ktoinfty$, the number $N(k)/A(k)$ tends to $#V(X/G)^-1$? If so, what error term estimates are known?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Very interesting! Can you please add the reference or the source of inspiration for this problem?
    $endgroup$
    – SeF
    Apr 4 at 8:50










  • $begingroup$
    It's kind of a graph analogue of lattice point counting.
    $endgroup$
    – Zero
    Apr 4 at 9:04










  • $begingroup$
    "The theory of lattices in automorphism groups of trees. The theory of tree lattices was developed by Bass, Kulkarni and Lubotzky[25][26] by analogy with the theory of lattices in Lie groups (that is discrete subgroups of Lie groups of finite co-volume). For a discrete subgroup G of the automorphism group of a locally finite tree X one can define a natural notion of volume for the quotient graph of groups A as $vol(A) = sum_v in V frac1lvert A_v rvert$" - wiki on Bass-Serre theory
    $endgroup$
    – i9Fn
    Apr 6 at 9:41













4












4








4





$begingroup$


Let $X$ be a connected, locally finite graph with vertex set $V(X)$ and $G$ a group acting freely on $X$ such that $X/G$ is a finite graph. Fix a vertex $x$ and for $kinmathbb N$ set
$$
N(k)=# gin G: d(gx,x)le k,
$$

where $d$ is the vertex distance in the graph $X$.
Further set
$$
A(k)=#yin V(X):d(x,y)le k.
$$

Is it true that, as $ktoinfty$, the number $N(k)/A(k)$ tends to $#V(X/G)^-1$? If so, what error term estimates are known?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $X$ be a connected, locally finite graph with vertex set $V(X)$ and $G$ a group acting freely on $X$ such that $X/G$ is a finite graph. Fix a vertex $x$ and for $kinmathbb N$ set
$$
N(k)=# gin G: d(gx,x)le k,
$$

where $d$ is the vertex distance in the graph $X$.
Further set
$$
A(k)=#yin V(X):d(x,y)le k.
$$

Is it true that, as $ktoinfty$, the number $N(k)/A(k)$ tends to $#V(X/G)^-1$? If so, what error term estimates are known?







graph-theory asymptotics






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Apr 4 at 9:01







Zero

















asked Apr 4 at 7:09









ZeroZero

2667




2667











  • $begingroup$
    Very interesting! Can you please add the reference or the source of inspiration for this problem?
    $endgroup$
    – SeF
    Apr 4 at 8:50










  • $begingroup$
    It's kind of a graph analogue of lattice point counting.
    $endgroup$
    – Zero
    Apr 4 at 9:04










  • $begingroup$
    "The theory of lattices in automorphism groups of trees. The theory of tree lattices was developed by Bass, Kulkarni and Lubotzky[25][26] by analogy with the theory of lattices in Lie groups (that is discrete subgroups of Lie groups of finite co-volume). For a discrete subgroup G of the automorphism group of a locally finite tree X one can define a natural notion of volume for the quotient graph of groups A as $vol(A) = sum_v in V frac1lvert A_v rvert$" - wiki on Bass-Serre theory
    $endgroup$
    – i9Fn
    Apr 6 at 9:41
















  • $begingroup$
    Very interesting! Can you please add the reference or the source of inspiration for this problem?
    $endgroup$
    – SeF
    Apr 4 at 8:50










  • $begingroup$
    It's kind of a graph analogue of lattice point counting.
    $endgroup$
    – Zero
    Apr 4 at 9:04










  • $begingroup$
    "The theory of lattices in automorphism groups of trees. The theory of tree lattices was developed by Bass, Kulkarni and Lubotzky[25][26] by analogy with the theory of lattices in Lie groups (that is discrete subgroups of Lie groups of finite co-volume). For a discrete subgroup G of the automorphism group of a locally finite tree X one can define a natural notion of volume for the quotient graph of groups A as $vol(A) = sum_v in V frac1lvert A_v rvert$" - wiki on Bass-Serre theory
    $endgroup$
    – i9Fn
    Apr 6 at 9:41















$begingroup$
Very interesting! Can you please add the reference or the source of inspiration for this problem?
$endgroup$
– SeF
Apr 4 at 8:50




$begingroup$
Very interesting! Can you please add the reference or the source of inspiration for this problem?
$endgroup$
– SeF
Apr 4 at 8:50












$begingroup$
It's kind of a graph analogue of lattice point counting.
$endgroup$
– Zero
Apr 4 at 9:04




$begingroup$
It's kind of a graph analogue of lattice point counting.
$endgroup$
– Zero
Apr 4 at 9:04












$begingroup$
"The theory of lattices in automorphism groups of trees. The theory of tree lattices was developed by Bass, Kulkarni and Lubotzky[25][26] by analogy with the theory of lattices in Lie groups (that is discrete subgroups of Lie groups of finite co-volume). For a discrete subgroup G of the automorphism group of a locally finite tree X one can define a natural notion of volume for the quotient graph of groups A as $vol(A) = sum_v in V frac1lvert A_v rvert$" - wiki on Bass-Serre theory
$endgroup$
– i9Fn
Apr 6 at 9:41




$begingroup$
"The theory of lattices in automorphism groups of trees. The theory of tree lattices was developed by Bass, Kulkarni and Lubotzky[25][26] by analogy with the theory of lattices in Lie groups (that is discrete subgroups of Lie groups of finite co-volume). For a discrete subgroup G of the automorphism group of a locally finite tree X one can define a natural notion of volume for the quotient graph of groups A as $vol(A) = sum_v in V frac1lvert A_v rvert$" - wiki on Bass-Serre theory
$endgroup$
– i9Fn
Apr 6 at 9:41










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

It is possible that the limit does not exist at all: Consider the free group on two generators acting on the $(4,2)$-biregular tree in the obvious way. This action is free and has 3 orbits (one containing all vertices of degree 4, and the other two containing "half" of the vertices of degree 2).



Let $x$ be a vertex of degree $4$. Then $N(k)$ is the number of vertices of degree 4 in $B_x(k)$, and $A(k)$ is the total number of vertices in $B_x(k)$. If we write $a_k$ and $b_k$ for the number of vertices at distance exactly $k$ from $x$ which have degree 4 or 2 respectively, we get $a_0 = 1$, and $b_2l+1 = a_2l+2 = 4cdot3^l$ and $b_2l = a_2l+1 = 0$ for $l geq 0$. Note that
$$fracN(k)A(k) = fracsum_i leq k a_isum_i leq k a_i + b_i$$
and if I'm not mistaken, plugging in the above values gives a limit of $frac 12$ for the subsequence of even $k$, and $frac 14$ for the subsequence of odd $k$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Can you explain how the free group acts on the $(4,2)$-biregular tree? It is not obvious to me what is the obvious way.
    $endgroup$
    – i9Fn
    Apr 5 at 18:00











  • $begingroup$
    The $4$-regular tree is a Cayley graph of the free group on two generators, which gives a natural action of this group on it. The $(4,2)$-regular tree inherits this action since it can be obtained from the $4$-regular tree by replacing every edge by a path of length $2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Florian Lehner
    Apr 8 at 8:45












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f327119%2fasymptotics-of-orbits-on-graphs%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5












$begingroup$

It is possible that the limit does not exist at all: Consider the free group on two generators acting on the $(4,2)$-biregular tree in the obvious way. This action is free and has 3 orbits (one containing all vertices of degree 4, and the other two containing "half" of the vertices of degree 2).



Let $x$ be a vertex of degree $4$. Then $N(k)$ is the number of vertices of degree 4 in $B_x(k)$, and $A(k)$ is the total number of vertices in $B_x(k)$. If we write $a_k$ and $b_k$ for the number of vertices at distance exactly $k$ from $x$ which have degree 4 or 2 respectively, we get $a_0 = 1$, and $b_2l+1 = a_2l+2 = 4cdot3^l$ and $b_2l = a_2l+1 = 0$ for $l geq 0$. Note that
$$fracN(k)A(k) = fracsum_i leq k a_isum_i leq k a_i + b_i$$
and if I'm not mistaken, plugging in the above values gives a limit of $frac 12$ for the subsequence of even $k$, and $frac 14$ for the subsequence of odd $k$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Can you explain how the free group acts on the $(4,2)$-biregular tree? It is not obvious to me what is the obvious way.
    $endgroup$
    – i9Fn
    Apr 5 at 18:00











  • $begingroup$
    The $4$-regular tree is a Cayley graph of the free group on two generators, which gives a natural action of this group on it. The $(4,2)$-regular tree inherits this action since it can be obtained from the $4$-regular tree by replacing every edge by a path of length $2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Florian Lehner
    Apr 8 at 8:45
















5












$begingroup$

It is possible that the limit does not exist at all: Consider the free group on two generators acting on the $(4,2)$-biregular tree in the obvious way. This action is free and has 3 orbits (one containing all vertices of degree 4, and the other two containing "half" of the vertices of degree 2).



Let $x$ be a vertex of degree $4$. Then $N(k)$ is the number of vertices of degree 4 in $B_x(k)$, and $A(k)$ is the total number of vertices in $B_x(k)$. If we write $a_k$ and $b_k$ for the number of vertices at distance exactly $k$ from $x$ which have degree 4 or 2 respectively, we get $a_0 = 1$, and $b_2l+1 = a_2l+2 = 4cdot3^l$ and $b_2l = a_2l+1 = 0$ for $l geq 0$. Note that
$$fracN(k)A(k) = fracsum_i leq k a_isum_i leq k a_i + b_i$$
and if I'm not mistaken, plugging in the above values gives a limit of $frac 12$ for the subsequence of even $k$, and $frac 14$ for the subsequence of odd $k$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Can you explain how the free group acts on the $(4,2)$-biregular tree? It is not obvious to me what is the obvious way.
    $endgroup$
    – i9Fn
    Apr 5 at 18:00











  • $begingroup$
    The $4$-regular tree is a Cayley graph of the free group on two generators, which gives a natural action of this group on it. The $(4,2)$-regular tree inherits this action since it can be obtained from the $4$-regular tree by replacing every edge by a path of length $2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Florian Lehner
    Apr 8 at 8:45














5












5








5





$begingroup$

It is possible that the limit does not exist at all: Consider the free group on two generators acting on the $(4,2)$-biregular tree in the obvious way. This action is free and has 3 orbits (one containing all vertices of degree 4, and the other two containing "half" of the vertices of degree 2).



Let $x$ be a vertex of degree $4$. Then $N(k)$ is the number of vertices of degree 4 in $B_x(k)$, and $A(k)$ is the total number of vertices in $B_x(k)$. If we write $a_k$ and $b_k$ for the number of vertices at distance exactly $k$ from $x$ which have degree 4 or 2 respectively, we get $a_0 = 1$, and $b_2l+1 = a_2l+2 = 4cdot3^l$ and $b_2l = a_2l+1 = 0$ for $l geq 0$. Note that
$$fracN(k)A(k) = fracsum_i leq k a_isum_i leq k a_i + b_i$$
and if I'm not mistaken, plugging in the above values gives a limit of $frac 12$ for the subsequence of even $k$, and $frac 14$ for the subsequence of odd $k$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



It is possible that the limit does not exist at all: Consider the free group on two generators acting on the $(4,2)$-biregular tree in the obvious way. This action is free and has 3 orbits (one containing all vertices of degree 4, and the other two containing "half" of the vertices of degree 2).



Let $x$ be a vertex of degree $4$. Then $N(k)$ is the number of vertices of degree 4 in $B_x(k)$, and $A(k)$ is the total number of vertices in $B_x(k)$. If we write $a_k$ and $b_k$ for the number of vertices at distance exactly $k$ from $x$ which have degree 4 or 2 respectively, we get $a_0 = 1$, and $b_2l+1 = a_2l+2 = 4cdot3^l$ and $b_2l = a_2l+1 = 0$ for $l geq 0$. Note that
$$fracN(k)A(k) = fracsum_i leq k a_isum_i leq k a_i + b_i$$
and if I'm not mistaken, plugging in the above values gives a limit of $frac 12$ for the subsequence of even $k$, and $frac 14$ for the subsequence of odd $k$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Apr 4 at 11:19









Florian LehnerFlorian Lehner

54138




54138







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Can you explain how the free group acts on the $(4,2)$-biregular tree? It is not obvious to me what is the obvious way.
    $endgroup$
    – i9Fn
    Apr 5 at 18:00











  • $begingroup$
    The $4$-regular tree is a Cayley graph of the free group on two generators, which gives a natural action of this group on it. The $(4,2)$-regular tree inherits this action since it can be obtained from the $4$-regular tree by replacing every edge by a path of length $2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Florian Lehner
    Apr 8 at 8:45













  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Can you explain how the free group acts on the $(4,2)$-biregular tree? It is not obvious to me what is the obvious way.
    $endgroup$
    – i9Fn
    Apr 5 at 18:00











  • $begingroup$
    The $4$-regular tree is a Cayley graph of the free group on two generators, which gives a natural action of this group on it. The $(4,2)$-regular tree inherits this action since it can be obtained from the $4$-regular tree by replacing every edge by a path of length $2$.
    $endgroup$
    – Florian Lehner
    Apr 8 at 8:45








1




1




$begingroup$
Can you explain how the free group acts on the $(4,2)$-biregular tree? It is not obvious to me what is the obvious way.
$endgroup$
– i9Fn
Apr 5 at 18:00





$begingroup$
Can you explain how the free group acts on the $(4,2)$-biregular tree? It is not obvious to me what is the obvious way.
$endgroup$
– i9Fn
Apr 5 at 18:00













$begingroup$
The $4$-regular tree is a Cayley graph of the free group on two generators, which gives a natural action of this group on it. The $(4,2)$-regular tree inherits this action since it can be obtained from the $4$-regular tree by replacing every edge by a path of length $2$.
$endgroup$
– Florian Lehner
Apr 8 at 8:45





$begingroup$
The $4$-regular tree is a Cayley graph of the free group on two generators, which gives a natural action of this group on it. The $(4,2)$-regular tree inherits this action since it can be obtained from the $4$-regular tree by replacing every edge by a path of length $2$.
$endgroup$
– Florian Lehner
Apr 8 at 8:45


















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f327119%2fasymptotics-of-orbits-on-graphs%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Adding axes to figuresAdding axes labels to LaTeX figuresLaTeX equivalent of ConTeXt buffersRotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?adding axes to shapesAlign axes across subfiguresAdding figures with a certain orderLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themAdding axes labels to LaTeX figures

Tähtien Talli Jäsenet | Lähteet | NavigointivalikkoSuomen Hippos – Tähtien Talli

Do these cracks on my tires look bad? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowDry rot tire should I replace?Having to replace tiresFishtailed so easily? Bad tires? ABS?Filling the tires with something other than air, to avoid puncture hassles?Used Michelin tires safe to install?Do these tyre cracks necessitate replacement?Rumbling noise: tires or mechanicalIs it possible to fix noisy feathered tires?Are bad winter tires still better than summer tires in winter?Torque converter failure - Related to replacing only 2 tires?Why use snow tires on all 4 wheels on 2-wheel-drive cars?