How do I write bicross product symbols in latex? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Symbol for contraction / interior product?mathabx package and Maya symbols problemAutomatic spacing of symbolsIs This Laplace Transform Symbol Available in LaTeX?Matplotlib symbolsmaking new symbol from two symbolsHow can I produce the symbols representing sign conventions for forces and moments in mechanical equilibrium equations?Spacing of symbols defined in tikzChemical symbols for the order of a rotational axisHow to find these symbols in LaTeX?

Statistical analysis applied to methods coming out of Machine Learning

Should man-made satellites feature an intelligent inverted "cow catcher"?

What does 丫 mean? 丫是什么意思?

Does the main washing effect of soap come from foam?

Do i imagine the linear (straight line) homotopy in a correct way?

Flight departed from the gate 5 min before scheduled departure time. Refund options

How to infer difference of population proportion between two groups when proportion is small?

Does a random sequence of vectors span a Hilbert space?

Can gravitational waves pass through a black hole?

Can two people see the same photon?

Is the Mordenkainen's Sword spell underpowered?

Found this skink in my tomato plant bucket. Is he trapped? Or could he leave if he wanted?

Marquee sign letters

How to name indistinguishable henchmen in a screenplay?

Is the time—manner—place ordering of adverbials an oversimplification?

Was the pager message from Nick Fury to Captain Marvel unnecessary?

Improvising over quartal voicings

Determine whether an integer is a palindrome

Is a copyright notice with a non-existent name be invalid?

Diophantine equation 3^a+1=3^b+5^c

malloc in main() or malloc in another function: allocating memory for a struct and its members

Weaponising the Grasp-at-a-Distance spell

Vertical ranges of Column Plots in 12

Noise in Eigenvalues plot



How do I write bicross product symbols in latex?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Symbol for contraction / interior product?mathabx package and Maya symbols problemAutomatic spacing of symbolsIs This Laplace Transform Symbol Available in LaTeX?Matplotlib symbolsmaking new symbol from two symbolsHow can I produce the symbols representing sign conventions for forces and moments in mechanical equilibrium equations?Spacing of symbols defined in tikzChemical symbols for the order of a rotational axisHow to find these symbols in LaTeX?










8















enter image description here



There are commands for the top two symbols ltimes and rtimes, however I have not been able to find commands for the other 4 symbols. Is there a simple way that I could create commands for these symbols?










share|improve this question




























    8















    enter image description here



    There are commands for the top two symbols ltimes and rtimes, however I have not been able to find commands for the other 4 symbols. Is there a simple way that I could create commands for these symbols?










    share|improve this question


























      8












      8








      8


      0






      enter image description here



      There are commands for the top two symbols ltimes and rtimes, however I have not been able to find commands for the other 4 symbols. Is there a simple way that I could create commands for these symbols?










      share|improve this question
















      enter image description here



      There are commands for the top two symbols ltimes and rtimes, however I have not been able to find commands for the other 4 symbols. Is there a simple way that I could create commands for these symbols?







      symbols






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Apr 4 at 14:08









      JouleV

      14.8k22666




      14.8k22666










      asked Apr 4 at 14:02









      Oliver MorrisonOliver Morrison

      442




      442




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          15














          Just combine existing symbols:



          documentclassarticle

          usepackageamssymb

          begindocument

          $blacktrianglerightmathrelmkern-4mu<$,
          $>mathrelmkern-4mublacktriangleleft$,
          $blacktrianglerightjoinrelmathreltriangleleft$,
          $mathreltrianglerightjoinrelblacktriangleleft$

          enddocument


          enter image description here



          joinrel is defined (robustly) as mathrelmkern-3mu. It's enough for the last two symbols; for the first two a slighlty larger value of 4mu looks better to me.



          As a matter of fact, ltimes and rtimes do not yield the "unsymmetric" symbols in your picture. They can be similarly obtained joining </ > with triangleleft/triangleright.



          $>joinrelmathreltriangleleft$ vs. $rtimes$
          $mathreltrianglerightjoinrel<$ vs. $ltimes$


          enter image description here



          My fantasy isn't rich enough to come up with names for all these ;-)






          share|improve this answer

























          • Since the second looks like an alpha drawn with lines, maybe linealpha and the reverse lineahpla?

            – AJFarmar
            Apr 4 at 18:49











          • [I am new to this site, hopefully this is how I comment] Thank you for the help! I have gone with Stevens solution, but I have taken inspiration from your response! With a few alterations I was able to improve on the ltimes and rtimes just as you did.

            – Oliver Morrison
            Apr 11 at 22:14


















          13














          This takes campa's answer (+1) and makes an enhancement/alteration: it scales the result downward to occupy the same vertical footprint as the letter x.



          Like campa's result, it works across math styles.



          The MWE:



          documentclassarticle
          usepackagemathtools,amssymb,scalerel
          newcommandbicrossl%
          mathrelscalerel*mathreltrianglerightjoinrelblacktriangleleftx
          newcommandbicrossr%
          mathrelscalerel*blacktrianglerightjoinrelmathreltriangleleftx
          newcommandbiopencrossl%
          mathrelscalerel*>kern-.4LMptjoinrelblacktriangleleftx
          newcommandbiopencrossr%
          mathrelscalerel*blacktrianglerightjoinrelkern-.4LMpt<x
          begindocument
          $xbicrossr y$ and $xbicrossl y$,

          $xbiopencrossr y$ and $xbiopencrossl y$,

          $scriptstyle xbicrossr y$ and $scriptstyle xbicrossl y$,

          $scriptstyle xbiopencrossr y$ and $scriptstyle xbiopencrossl y$,
          enddocument


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer




















          • 1





            +1 to you too, but my version already scales correctly in different math styles ;-)

            – campa
            Apr 4 at 14:32











          • @campa Sorry. No slight intended Revised to reflect this fact.

            – Steven B. Segletes
            Apr 4 at 14:35











          • None taken :-)

            – campa
            Apr 4 at 14:36











          • [I am new to this site, hopefully this is how I comment] Thank you for your response, I've manged to alter your solution slightly to get what I want. :)

            – Oliver Morrison
            Apr 11 at 22:12











          • That's great. This is the way to comment to the giver of an answer. To comment to someone who is part of the conversation but not the owner of the question or answer, you need to cite them by name, as in @OliverMorrison . Welcome to the site!

            – Steven B. Segletes
            Apr 12 at 0:47











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "85"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f483160%2fhow-do-i-write-bicross-product-symbols-in-latex%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          15














          Just combine existing symbols:



          documentclassarticle

          usepackageamssymb

          begindocument

          $blacktrianglerightmathrelmkern-4mu<$,
          $>mathrelmkern-4mublacktriangleleft$,
          $blacktrianglerightjoinrelmathreltriangleleft$,
          $mathreltrianglerightjoinrelblacktriangleleft$

          enddocument


          enter image description here



          joinrel is defined (robustly) as mathrelmkern-3mu. It's enough for the last two symbols; for the first two a slighlty larger value of 4mu looks better to me.



          As a matter of fact, ltimes and rtimes do not yield the "unsymmetric" symbols in your picture. They can be similarly obtained joining </ > with triangleleft/triangleright.



          $>joinrelmathreltriangleleft$ vs. $rtimes$
          $mathreltrianglerightjoinrel<$ vs. $ltimes$


          enter image description here



          My fantasy isn't rich enough to come up with names for all these ;-)






          share|improve this answer

























          • Since the second looks like an alpha drawn with lines, maybe linealpha and the reverse lineahpla?

            – AJFarmar
            Apr 4 at 18:49











          • [I am new to this site, hopefully this is how I comment] Thank you for the help! I have gone with Stevens solution, but I have taken inspiration from your response! With a few alterations I was able to improve on the ltimes and rtimes just as you did.

            – Oliver Morrison
            Apr 11 at 22:14















          15














          Just combine existing symbols:



          documentclassarticle

          usepackageamssymb

          begindocument

          $blacktrianglerightmathrelmkern-4mu<$,
          $>mathrelmkern-4mublacktriangleleft$,
          $blacktrianglerightjoinrelmathreltriangleleft$,
          $mathreltrianglerightjoinrelblacktriangleleft$

          enddocument


          enter image description here



          joinrel is defined (robustly) as mathrelmkern-3mu. It's enough for the last two symbols; for the first two a slighlty larger value of 4mu looks better to me.



          As a matter of fact, ltimes and rtimes do not yield the "unsymmetric" symbols in your picture. They can be similarly obtained joining </ > with triangleleft/triangleright.



          $>joinrelmathreltriangleleft$ vs. $rtimes$
          $mathreltrianglerightjoinrel<$ vs. $ltimes$


          enter image description here



          My fantasy isn't rich enough to come up with names for all these ;-)






          share|improve this answer

























          • Since the second looks like an alpha drawn with lines, maybe linealpha and the reverse lineahpla?

            – AJFarmar
            Apr 4 at 18:49











          • [I am new to this site, hopefully this is how I comment] Thank you for the help! I have gone with Stevens solution, but I have taken inspiration from your response! With a few alterations I was able to improve on the ltimes and rtimes just as you did.

            – Oliver Morrison
            Apr 11 at 22:14













          15












          15








          15







          Just combine existing symbols:



          documentclassarticle

          usepackageamssymb

          begindocument

          $blacktrianglerightmathrelmkern-4mu<$,
          $>mathrelmkern-4mublacktriangleleft$,
          $blacktrianglerightjoinrelmathreltriangleleft$,
          $mathreltrianglerightjoinrelblacktriangleleft$

          enddocument


          enter image description here



          joinrel is defined (robustly) as mathrelmkern-3mu. It's enough for the last two symbols; for the first two a slighlty larger value of 4mu looks better to me.



          As a matter of fact, ltimes and rtimes do not yield the "unsymmetric" symbols in your picture. They can be similarly obtained joining </ > with triangleleft/triangleright.



          $>joinrelmathreltriangleleft$ vs. $rtimes$
          $mathreltrianglerightjoinrel<$ vs. $ltimes$


          enter image description here



          My fantasy isn't rich enough to come up with names for all these ;-)






          share|improve this answer















          Just combine existing symbols:



          documentclassarticle

          usepackageamssymb

          begindocument

          $blacktrianglerightmathrelmkern-4mu<$,
          $>mathrelmkern-4mublacktriangleleft$,
          $blacktrianglerightjoinrelmathreltriangleleft$,
          $mathreltrianglerightjoinrelblacktriangleleft$

          enddocument


          enter image description here



          joinrel is defined (robustly) as mathrelmkern-3mu. It's enough for the last two symbols; for the first two a slighlty larger value of 4mu looks better to me.



          As a matter of fact, ltimes and rtimes do not yield the "unsymmetric" symbols in your picture. They can be similarly obtained joining </ > with triangleleft/triangleright.



          $>joinrelmathreltriangleleft$ vs. $rtimes$
          $mathreltrianglerightjoinrel<$ vs. $ltimes$


          enter image description here



          My fantasy isn't rich enough to come up with names for all these ;-)







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Apr 4 at 15:02

























          answered Apr 4 at 14:20









          campacampa

          6,70521439




          6,70521439












          • Since the second looks like an alpha drawn with lines, maybe linealpha and the reverse lineahpla?

            – AJFarmar
            Apr 4 at 18:49











          • [I am new to this site, hopefully this is how I comment] Thank you for the help! I have gone with Stevens solution, but I have taken inspiration from your response! With a few alterations I was able to improve on the ltimes and rtimes just as you did.

            – Oliver Morrison
            Apr 11 at 22:14

















          • Since the second looks like an alpha drawn with lines, maybe linealpha and the reverse lineahpla?

            – AJFarmar
            Apr 4 at 18:49











          • [I am new to this site, hopefully this is how I comment] Thank you for the help! I have gone with Stevens solution, but I have taken inspiration from your response! With a few alterations I was able to improve on the ltimes and rtimes just as you did.

            – Oliver Morrison
            Apr 11 at 22:14
















          Since the second looks like an alpha drawn with lines, maybe linealpha and the reverse lineahpla?

          – AJFarmar
          Apr 4 at 18:49





          Since the second looks like an alpha drawn with lines, maybe linealpha and the reverse lineahpla?

          – AJFarmar
          Apr 4 at 18:49













          [I am new to this site, hopefully this is how I comment] Thank you for the help! I have gone with Stevens solution, but I have taken inspiration from your response! With a few alterations I was able to improve on the ltimes and rtimes just as you did.

          – Oliver Morrison
          Apr 11 at 22:14





          [I am new to this site, hopefully this is how I comment] Thank you for the help! I have gone with Stevens solution, but I have taken inspiration from your response! With a few alterations I was able to improve on the ltimes and rtimes just as you did.

          – Oliver Morrison
          Apr 11 at 22:14











          13














          This takes campa's answer (+1) and makes an enhancement/alteration: it scales the result downward to occupy the same vertical footprint as the letter x.



          Like campa's result, it works across math styles.



          The MWE:



          documentclassarticle
          usepackagemathtools,amssymb,scalerel
          newcommandbicrossl%
          mathrelscalerel*mathreltrianglerightjoinrelblacktriangleleftx
          newcommandbicrossr%
          mathrelscalerel*blacktrianglerightjoinrelmathreltriangleleftx
          newcommandbiopencrossl%
          mathrelscalerel*>kern-.4LMptjoinrelblacktriangleleftx
          newcommandbiopencrossr%
          mathrelscalerel*blacktrianglerightjoinrelkern-.4LMpt<x
          begindocument
          $xbicrossr y$ and $xbicrossl y$,

          $xbiopencrossr y$ and $xbiopencrossl y$,

          $scriptstyle xbicrossr y$ and $scriptstyle xbicrossl y$,

          $scriptstyle xbiopencrossr y$ and $scriptstyle xbiopencrossl y$,
          enddocument


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer




















          • 1





            +1 to you too, but my version already scales correctly in different math styles ;-)

            – campa
            Apr 4 at 14:32











          • @campa Sorry. No slight intended Revised to reflect this fact.

            – Steven B. Segletes
            Apr 4 at 14:35











          • None taken :-)

            – campa
            Apr 4 at 14:36











          • [I am new to this site, hopefully this is how I comment] Thank you for your response, I've manged to alter your solution slightly to get what I want. :)

            – Oliver Morrison
            Apr 11 at 22:12











          • That's great. This is the way to comment to the giver of an answer. To comment to someone who is part of the conversation but not the owner of the question or answer, you need to cite them by name, as in @OliverMorrison . Welcome to the site!

            – Steven B. Segletes
            Apr 12 at 0:47















          13














          This takes campa's answer (+1) and makes an enhancement/alteration: it scales the result downward to occupy the same vertical footprint as the letter x.



          Like campa's result, it works across math styles.



          The MWE:



          documentclassarticle
          usepackagemathtools,amssymb,scalerel
          newcommandbicrossl%
          mathrelscalerel*mathreltrianglerightjoinrelblacktriangleleftx
          newcommandbicrossr%
          mathrelscalerel*blacktrianglerightjoinrelmathreltriangleleftx
          newcommandbiopencrossl%
          mathrelscalerel*>kern-.4LMptjoinrelblacktriangleleftx
          newcommandbiopencrossr%
          mathrelscalerel*blacktrianglerightjoinrelkern-.4LMpt<x
          begindocument
          $xbicrossr y$ and $xbicrossl y$,

          $xbiopencrossr y$ and $xbiopencrossl y$,

          $scriptstyle xbicrossr y$ and $scriptstyle xbicrossl y$,

          $scriptstyle xbiopencrossr y$ and $scriptstyle xbiopencrossl y$,
          enddocument


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer




















          • 1





            +1 to you too, but my version already scales correctly in different math styles ;-)

            – campa
            Apr 4 at 14:32











          • @campa Sorry. No slight intended Revised to reflect this fact.

            – Steven B. Segletes
            Apr 4 at 14:35











          • None taken :-)

            – campa
            Apr 4 at 14:36











          • [I am new to this site, hopefully this is how I comment] Thank you for your response, I've manged to alter your solution slightly to get what I want. :)

            – Oliver Morrison
            Apr 11 at 22:12











          • That's great. This is the way to comment to the giver of an answer. To comment to someone who is part of the conversation but not the owner of the question or answer, you need to cite them by name, as in @OliverMorrison . Welcome to the site!

            – Steven B. Segletes
            Apr 12 at 0:47













          13












          13








          13







          This takes campa's answer (+1) and makes an enhancement/alteration: it scales the result downward to occupy the same vertical footprint as the letter x.



          Like campa's result, it works across math styles.



          The MWE:



          documentclassarticle
          usepackagemathtools,amssymb,scalerel
          newcommandbicrossl%
          mathrelscalerel*mathreltrianglerightjoinrelblacktriangleleftx
          newcommandbicrossr%
          mathrelscalerel*blacktrianglerightjoinrelmathreltriangleleftx
          newcommandbiopencrossl%
          mathrelscalerel*>kern-.4LMptjoinrelblacktriangleleftx
          newcommandbiopencrossr%
          mathrelscalerel*blacktrianglerightjoinrelkern-.4LMpt<x
          begindocument
          $xbicrossr y$ and $xbicrossl y$,

          $xbiopencrossr y$ and $xbiopencrossl y$,

          $scriptstyle xbicrossr y$ and $scriptstyle xbicrossl y$,

          $scriptstyle xbiopencrossr y$ and $scriptstyle xbiopencrossl y$,
          enddocument


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer















          This takes campa's answer (+1) and makes an enhancement/alteration: it scales the result downward to occupy the same vertical footprint as the letter x.



          Like campa's result, it works across math styles.



          The MWE:



          documentclassarticle
          usepackagemathtools,amssymb,scalerel
          newcommandbicrossl%
          mathrelscalerel*mathreltrianglerightjoinrelblacktriangleleftx
          newcommandbicrossr%
          mathrelscalerel*blacktrianglerightjoinrelmathreltriangleleftx
          newcommandbiopencrossl%
          mathrelscalerel*>kern-.4LMptjoinrelblacktriangleleftx
          newcommandbiopencrossr%
          mathrelscalerel*blacktrianglerightjoinrelkern-.4LMpt<x
          begindocument
          $xbicrossr y$ and $xbicrossl y$,

          $xbiopencrossr y$ and $xbiopencrossl y$,

          $scriptstyle xbicrossr y$ and $scriptstyle xbicrossl y$,

          $scriptstyle xbiopencrossr y$ and $scriptstyle xbiopencrossl y$,
          enddocument


          enter image description here







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Apr 4 at 17:45

























          answered Apr 4 at 14:30









          Steven B. SegletesSteven B. Segletes

          163k9207419




          163k9207419







          • 1





            +1 to you too, but my version already scales correctly in different math styles ;-)

            – campa
            Apr 4 at 14:32











          • @campa Sorry. No slight intended Revised to reflect this fact.

            – Steven B. Segletes
            Apr 4 at 14:35











          • None taken :-)

            – campa
            Apr 4 at 14:36











          • [I am new to this site, hopefully this is how I comment] Thank you for your response, I've manged to alter your solution slightly to get what I want. :)

            – Oliver Morrison
            Apr 11 at 22:12











          • That's great. This is the way to comment to the giver of an answer. To comment to someone who is part of the conversation but not the owner of the question or answer, you need to cite them by name, as in @OliverMorrison . Welcome to the site!

            – Steven B. Segletes
            Apr 12 at 0:47












          • 1





            +1 to you too, but my version already scales correctly in different math styles ;-)

            – campa
            Apr 4 at 14:32











          • @campa Sorry. No slight intended Revised to reflect this fact.

            – Steven B. Segletes
            Apr 4 at 14:35











          • None taken :-)

            – campa
            Apr 4 at 14:36











          • [I am new to this site, hopefully this is how I comment] Thank you for your response, I've manged to alter your solution slightly to get what I want. :)

            – Oliver Morrison
            Apr 11 at 22:12











          • That's great. This is the way to comment to the giver of an answer. To comment to someone who is part of the conversation but not the owner of the question or answer, you need to cite them by name, as in @OliverMorrison . Welcome to the site!

            – Steven B. Segletes
            Apr 12 at 0:47







          1




          1





          +1 to you too, but my version already scales correctly in different math styles ;-)

          – campa
          Apr 4 at 14:32





          +1 to you too, but my version already scales correctly in different math styles ;-)

          – campa
          Apr 4 at 14:32













          @campa Sorry. No slight intended Revised to reflect this fact.

          – Steven B. Segletes
          Apr 4 at 14:35





          @campa Sorry. No slight intended Revised to reflect this fact.

          – Steven B. Segletes
          Apr 4 at 14:35













          None taken :-)

          – campa
          Apr 4 at 14:36





          None taken :-)

          – campa
          Apr 4 at 14:36













          [I am new to this site, hopefully this is how I comment] Thank you for your response, I've manged to alter your solution slightly to get what I want. :)

          – Oliver Morrison
          Apr 11 at 22:12





          [I am new to this site, hopefully this is how I comment] Thank you for your response, I've manged to alter your solution slightly to get what I want. :)

          – Oliver Morrison
          Apr 11 at 22:12













          That's great. This is the way to comment to the giver of an answer. To comment to someone who is part of the conversation but not the owner of the question or answer, you need to cite them by name, as in @OliverMorrison . Welcome to the site!

          – Steven B. Segletes
          Apr 12 at 0:47





          That's great. This is the way to comment to the giver of an answer. To comment to someone who is part of the conversation but not the owner of the question or answer, you need to cite them by name, as in @OliverMorrison . Welcome to the site!

          – Steven B. Segletes
          Apr 12 at 0:47

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f483160%2fhow-do-i-write-bicross-product-symbols-in-latex%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Adding axes to figuresAdding axes labels to LaTeX figuresLaTeX equivalent of ConTeXt buffersRotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?adding axes to shapesAlign axes across subfiguresAdding figures with a certain orderLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themAdding axes labels to LaTeX figures

          Tähtien Talli Jäsenet | Lähteet | NavigointivalikkoSuomen Hippos – Tähtien Talli

          Do these cracks on my tires look bad? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowDry rot tire should I replace?Having to replace tiresFishtailed so easily? Bad tires? ABS?Filling the tires with something other than air, to avoid puncture hassles?Used Michelin tires safe to install?Do these tyre cracks necessitate replacement?Rumbling noise: tires or mechanicalIs it possible to fix noisy feathered tires?Are bad winter tires still better than summer tires in winter?Torque converter failure - Related to replacing only 2 tires?Why use snow tires on all 4 wheels on 2-wheel-drive cars?