What's the point of deactivating Num Lock on login screens? [closed] Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Lock screens and password recovery on appsSocial Login adoption vs Traditional LoginAre there any studies which investigate the usage of Caps-Lock?What's the point in asking the user to do what an application can do itself?Display password Requirements on Login screen?What's the best tab order for a login form?Different Screens/Functionality after loginAutomatic login on password resetShowing predictive text on app login screensWhy warn about caps lock for passwords, instead of ignoring caps lock for password characters?

Is a copyright notice with a non-existent name be invalid?

Derived column in a data extension

Did pre-Columbian Americans know the spherical shape of the Earth?

How to resize main filesystem

"Destructive power" carried by a B-52?

French equivalents of おしゃれは足元から (Every good outfit starts with the shoes)

Does the universe have a fixed centre of mass?

How can I prevent/balance waiting and turtling as a response to cooldown mechanics

Did any compiler fully use 80-bit floating point?

Keep at all times, the minus sign above aligned with minus sign below

What is "Lambda" in Heston's original paper on stochastic volatility models?

Why are current probes so expensive?

Why not use the yoke to control yaw, as well as pitch and roll?

Is this Half dragon Quaggoth Balanced

One-one communication

Russian equivalents of おしゃれは足元から (Every good outfit starts with the shoes)

First paper to introduce the "principal-agent problem"

newbie Q : How to read an output file in one command line

By what mechanism was the 2017 UK General Election called?

The Nth Gryphon Number

How to make an animal which can only breed for a certain number of generations?

Why is there so little support for joining EFTA in the British parliament?

Diophantine equation 3^a+1=3^b+5^c

Fit odd number of triplets in a measure?



What's the point of deactivating Num Lock on login screens? [closed]



Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Lock screens and password recovery on appsSocial Login adoption vs Traditional LoginAre there any studies which investigate the usage of Caps-Lock?What's the point in asking the user to do what an application can do itself?Display password Requirements on Login screen?What's the best tab order for a login form?Different Screens/Functionality after loginAutomatic login on password resetShowing predictive text on app login screensWhy warn about caps lock for passwords, instead of ignoring caps lock for password characters?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








45















Many login screens automatically deactivate the Num Lock key on the keyboard before the user can enter their password. This is extremely frustrating for the user as they involuntarily type their password wrong multiple times before realising the Num Lock key is off.



Several undesirable side effects include:



  • Missing the password involuntarily 3 times, thereby locking the system,

  • Having a timeout after each missed password attempt, sometimes up to several minutes,

  • Frustration when one repeatedly forgets to activate the Num Lock key.

Moreover, I don't see what the reason for this would be from a security viewpoint. It does not enhance the quality of the password nor does it ward off any potential attacker.



So why are very widespread systems still using this extremely frustrating methodology?










share|improve this question















closed as off-topic by MonkeyZeus, JonW Apr 7 at 10:44



  • This question does not appear to be about user experience within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • 46





    Can you provide an example per your "many" claim? The most prevalent operating system's (Windows') login screen does not exhibit this failure, ahem "feature".

    – MonkeyZeus
    Apr 4 at 11:35







  • 59





    I never encountered a login screen that deactivates numlock. Are you perhaps mistaking the bios option to turn numlock on or off on boot as a "login screen feature"?

    – Gerald Schneider
    Apr 4 at 11:49






  • 6





    @leftaroundabout you seem to assume a password typed exclusively on the number pad, rather than just a few characters; you also seem to assume that a user only uses one type of keyboard to log in to a system. (I have, once, used a system with an ultracompact builtin keyboard with no number row and a USB number pad, as an example of an edge case where this would be particularly irritating)

    – Chris H
    Apr 4 at 15:19






  • 15





    At this point I'd be happy with ONE example of a login screen that does this. I've never seen it.

    – JPhi1618
    Apr 5 at 4:32






  • 8





    @Klangen there are more up votes on the multiple comments asking you to substantiate this actually happens than there are on your question, so I'm not sure "well-received" is exactly accurate. We do have one example in the comments from Tom where it's definitely tied to the login screen rather than rebooting, but IMO your question would be improved if you edited in where you've seen this in more detail. It's definitely not standard functionality on Windows, so knowing more could help us answer what the purpose is.

    – Kat
    Apr 5 at 16:52

















45















Many login screens automatically deactivate the Num Lock key on the keyboard before the user can enter their password. This is extremely frustrating for the user as they involuntarily type their password wrong multiple times before realising the Num Lock key is off.



Several undesirable side effects include:



  • Missing the password involuntarily 3 times, thereby locking the system,

  • Having a timeout after each missed password attempt, sometimes up to several minutes,

  • Frustration when one repeatedly forgets to activate the Num Lock key.

Moreover, I don't see what the reason for this would be from a security viewpoint. It does not enhance the quality of the password nor does it ward off any potential attacker.



So why are very widespread systems still using this extremely frustrating methodology?










share|improve this question















closed as off-topic by MonkeyZeus, JonW Apr 7 at 10:44



  • This question does not appear to be about user experience within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • 46





    Can you provide an example per your "many" claim? The most prevalent operating system's (Windows') login screen does not exhibit this failure, ahem "feature".

    – MonkeyZeus
    Apr 4 at 11:35







  • 59





    I never encountered a login screen that deactivates numlock. Are you perhaps mistaking the bios option to turn numlock on or off on boot as a "login screen feature"?

    – Gerald Schneider
    Apr 4 at 11:49






  • 6





    @leftaroundabout you seem to assume a password typed exclusively on the number pad, rather than just a few characters; you also seem to assume that a user only uses one type of keyboard to log in to a system. (I have, once, used a system with an ultracompact builtin keyboard with no number row and a USB number pad, as an example of an edge case where this would be particularly irritating)

    – Chris H
    Apr 4 at 15:19






  • 15





    At this point I'd be happy with ONE example of a login screen that does this. I've never seen it.

    – JPhi1618
    Apr 5 at 4:32






  • 8





    @Klangen there are more up votes on the multiple comments asking you to substantiate this actually happens than there are on your question, so I'm not sure "well-received" is exactly accurate. We do have one example in the comments from Tom where it's definitely tied to the login screen rather than rebooting, but IMO your question would be improved if you edited in where you've seen this in more detail. It's definitely not standard functionality on Windows, so knowing more could help us answer what the purpose is.

    – Kat
    Apr 5 at 16:52













45












45








45


2






Many login screens automatically deactivate the Num Lock key on the keyboard before the user can enter their password. This is extremely frustrating for the user as they involuntarily type their password wrong multiple times before realising the Num Lock key is off.



Several undesirable side effects include:



  • Missing the password involuntarily 3 times, thereby locking the system,

  • Having a timeout after each missed password attempt, sometimes up to several minutes,

  • Frustration when one repeatedly forgets to activate the Num Lock key.

Moreover, I don't see what the reason for this would be from a security viewpoint. It does not enhance the quality of the password nor does it ward off any potential attacker.



So why are very widespread systems still using this extremely frustrating methodology?










share|improve this question
















Many login screens automatically deactivate the Num Lock key on the keyboard before the user can enter their password. This is extremely frustrating for the user as they involuntarily type their password wrong multiple times before realising the Num Lock key is off.



Several undesirable side effects include:



  • Missing the password involuntarily 3 times, thereby locking the system,

  • Having a timeout after each missed password attempt, sometimes up to several minutes,

  • Frustration when one repeatedly forgets to activate the Num Lock key.

Moreover, I don't see what the reason for this would be from a security viewpoint. It does not enhance the quality of the password nor does it ward off any potential attacker.



So why are very widespread systems still using this extremely frustrating methodology?







usability login password keyboard






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 6 at 1:23









unor

3,2831738




3,2831738










asked Apr 4 at 7:44









KlangenKlangen

33436




33436




closed as off-topic by MonkeyZeus, JonW Apr 7 at 10:44



  • This question does not appear to be about user experience within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







closed as off-topic by MonkeyZeus, JonW Apr 7 at 10:44



  • This question does not appear to be about user experience within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







  • 46





    Can you provide an example per your "many" claim? The most prevalent operating system's (Windows') login screen does not exhibit this failure, ahem "feature".

    – MonkeyZeus
    Apr 4 at 11:35







  • 59





    I never encountered a login screen that deactivates numlock. Are you perhaps mistaking the bios option to turn numlock on or off on boot as a "login screen feature"?

    – Gerald Schneider
    Apr 4 at 11:49






  • 6





    @leftaroundabout you seem to assume a password typed exclusively on the number pad, rather than just a few characters; you also seem to assume that a user only uses one type of keyboard to log in to a system. (I have, once, used a system with an ultracompact builtin keyboard with no number row and a USB number pad, as an example of an edge case where this would be particularly irritating)

    – Chris H
    Apr 4 at 15:19






  • 15





    At this point I'd be happy with ONE example of a login screen that does this. I've never seen it.

    – JPhi1618
    Apr 5 at 4:32






  • 8





    @Klangen there are more up votes on the multiple comments asking you to substantiate this actually happens than there are on your question, so I'm not sure "well-received" is exactly accurate. We do have one example in the comments from Tom where it's definitely tied to the login screen rather than rebooting, but IMO your question would be improved if you edited in where you've seen this in more detail. It's definitely not standard functionality on Windows, so knowing more could help us answer what the purpose is.

    – Kat
    Apr 5 at 16:52












  • 46





    Can you provide an example per your "many" claim? The most prevalent operating system's (Windows') login screen does not exhibit this failure, ahem "feature".

    – MonkeyZeus
    Apr 4 at 11:35







  • 59





    I never encountered a login screen that deactivates numlock. Are you perhaps mistaking the bios option to turn numlock on or off on boot as a "login screen feature"?

    – Gerald Schneider
    Apr 4 at 11:49






  • 6





    @leftaroundabout you seem to assume a password typed exclusively on the number pad, rather than just a few characters; you also seem to assume that a user only uses one type of keyboard to log in to a system. (I have, once, used a system with an ultracompact builtin keyboard with no number row and a USB number pad, as an example of an edge case where this would be particularly irritating)

    – Chris H
    Apr 4 at 15:19






  • 15





    At this point I'd be happy with ONE example of a login screen that does this. I've never seen it.

    – JPhi1618
    Apr 5 at 4:32






  • 8





    @Klangen there are more up votes on the multiple comments asking you to substantiate this actually happens than there are on your question, so I'm not sure "well-received" is exactly accurate. We do have one example in the comments from Tom where it's definitely tied to the login screen rather than rebooting, but IMO your question would be improved if you edited in where you've seen this in more detail. It's definitely not standard functionality on Windows, so knowing more could help us answer what the purpose is.

    – Kat
    Apr 5 at 16:52







46




46





Can you provide an example per your "many" claim? The most prevalent operating system's (Windows') login screen does not exhibit this failure, ahem "feature".

– MonkeyZeus
Apr 4 at 11:35






Can you provide an example per your "many" claim? The most prevalent operating system's (Windows') login screen does not exhibit this failure, ahem "feature".

– MonkeyZeus
Apr 4 at 11:35





59




59





I never encountered a login screen that deactivates numlock. Are you perhaps mistaking the bios option to turn numlock on or off on boot as a "login screen feature"?

– Gerald Schneider
Apr 4 at 11:49





I never encountered a login screen that deactivates numlock. Are you perhaps mistaking the bios option to turn numlock on or off on boot as a "login screen feature"?

– Gerald Schneider
Apr 4 at 11:49




6




6





@leftaroundabout you seem to assume a password typed exclusively on the number pad, rather than just a few characters; you also seem to assume that a user only uses one type of keyboard to log in to a system. (I have, once, used a system with an ultracompact builtin keyboard with no number row and a USB number pad, as an example of an edge case where this would be particularly irritating)

– Chris H
Apr 4 at 15:19





@leftaroundabout you seem to assume a password typed exclusively on the number pad, rather than just a few characters; you also seem to assume that a user only uses one type of keyboard to log in to a system. (I have, once, used a system with an ultracompact builtin keyboard with no number row and a USB number pad, as an example of an edge case where this would be particularly irritating)

– Chris H
Apr 4 at 15:19




15




15





At this point I'd be happy with ONE example of a login screen that does this. I've never seen it.

– JPhi1618
Apr 5 at 4:32





At this point I'd be happy with ONE example of a login screen that does this. I've never seen it.

– JPhi1618
Apr 5 at 4:32




8




8





@Klangen there are more up votes on the multiple comments asking you to substantiate this actually happens than there are on your question, so I'm not sure "well-received" is exactly accurate. We do have one example in the comments from Tom where it's definitely tied to the login screen rather than rebooting, but IMO your question would be improved if you edited in where you've seen this in more detail. It's definitely not standard functionality on Windows, so knowing more could help us answer what the purpose is.

– Kat
Apr 5 at 16:52





@Klangen there are more up votes on the multiple comments asking you to substantiate this actually happens than there are on your question, so I'm not sure "well-received" is exactly accurate. We do have one example in the comments from Tom where it's definitely tied to the login screen rather than rebooting, but IMO your question would be improved if you edited in where you've seen this in more detail. It's definitely not standard functionality on Windows, so knowing more could help us answer what the purpose is.

– Kat
Apr 5 at 16:52










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















70














Some compact keyboard layouts don't have a numpad, so those keys are mapped to the right-hand side of the letter section:
enter image description here



If NumLock is on, then a user typing the password kill, will actually type 2533. Turning NumLock off will prevent this problem, but of course - it will cause another one for those who do rely on the numpad. Keeping it on or off by default will lead to mode errors - regardless of what initial state is chosen, someone will be surprised by it.



A better solution would be to reflect the state of the NumLock key on the screen, akin to the CapsLock key. This way there are no surprises, as this state indicator is in the users' locus of attention.



An example are Acer Revo computers, distributed with compact wireless keyboards. I installed a fresh OS and set up a password, then successfully "confirmed" it. However, what I thought I was doing was different from what the computer saw me do. This problem only became evident when I attempted to connect to the machine remotely, from a place with a proper keyboard.



Many hours and "this cannot be" statements later, I undersood that NumLock was the culprit.






share|improve this answer


















  • 10





    How come the cause of mode errors is keeping NumLock on or off by default, rather than changing NumLock's state without the user's knowledge or will? I'd have thought that keeping it on or off by default will lead to the keyboard behaving as the user expects.

    – Rosie F
    Apr 4 at 18:55






  • 3





    I've got one of those keyboards for when I need to log in locally to a normally-headless server, and I can't tell you how many times I've tried to log in as "r66t".

    – Mark
    Apr 4 at 21:01






  • 2





    Rosie, you raise a valid point. The reason I wrote that is because of the expectation that pressing o yields an "o". When NumLock is on, that yields a "6" (hidden under *, ha!). If one uses a numpad to type 1966, it yields 19→→ if NumLock is off. So, users from both camps can be caught off-guard, regardless of the default value. So it is not that the system sneakily changed the state; nowadays people use diverse keyboards in different places, a system can't guess what this user is used to. Numlock=off is the lowest common denominator, as more and more keyboards don't have numpads.

    – ralien
    Apr 4 at 22:51






  • 2





    Fn-Keys are usually not mapped using NumLock. I guess one of the reasons is this issue. On quite a few devices using Fn-Keys, I never saw one using NumLock for switching. Usually you need to always press Fn, sometimes there is an option to reverse the behaviour (e.g. on notebooks, where multimedia keys are the default an Fx keys need Fn you can often switch this in the BIOS).

    – allo
    Apr 5 at 10:15











  • I agree with Rosie, changing a user’s default behavior is not good UX and most of all will lead to fewer errors. I also agree with the answer, if this is a necessary consideration to display the state on screen. I’d argue it isn’t necessary as billions of people have been fine for decades.

    – vol7ron
    Apr 5 at 23:44


















9














It's a bad UX practice primarily because the user is not expecting this to happen. Users will attempt to do an action and will not be able to do so.






share|improve this answer
































    3















    Many login screens automatically deactivate the Num Lock key on the keyboard before the user can enter their password.




    I don't believe that this is true.



    It may be that Num Lock happens to be off when at a login screen, but I doubt that the login screen is actively turning it off. That is, it's not intentionally done as some way to enhance security (because it doesn't); it's an artifact of how the rest of the system is designed.



    On Windows, whether Num Lock is on or off is a user-specific preference. If you have a multi-user system and one person prefers Num Lock on and another user prefers Num Lock off, what should the behavior be at the login screen when no one is logged in?



    If I log out, my preferences should no longer be active. Instead, the "default" user's preferences become active, and those are likely to have Num Lock off because that's the safer default for compact/laptop keyboards. (On Windows, this would be stored in the registry, encoded in HKEY_USERS.DEFAULTControl PanelKeyboardInitialKeyboardIndicators.)






    share|improve this answer

























    • As far as I understand, this regedit attribute is only read after startup, and doesn't have any influence on the login screen. NumLock status also seems to be independent from BIOS settings, at least on my Win10.

      – Eric Duminil
      Apr 12 at 13:47

















    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    70














    Some compact keyboard layouts don't have a numpad, so those keys are mapped to the right-hand side of the letter section:
    enter image description here



    If NumLock is on, then a user typing the password kill, will actually type 2533. Turning NumLock off will prevent this problem, but of course - it will cause another one for those who do rely on the numpad. Keeping it on or off by default will lead to mode errors - regardless of what initial state is chosen, someone will be surprised by it.



    A better solution would be to reflect the state of the NumLock key on the screen, akin to the CapsLock key. This way there are no surprises, as this state indicator is in the users' locus of attention.



    An example are Acer Revo computers, distributed with compact wireless keyboards. I installed a fresh OS and set up a password, then successfully "confirmed" it. However, what I thought I was doing was different from what the computer saw me do. This problem only became evident when I attempted to connect to the machine remotely, from a place with a proper keyboard.



    Many hours and "this cannot be" statements later, I undersood that NumLock was the culprit.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 10





      How come the cause of mode errors is keeping NumLock on or off by default, rather than changing NumLock's state without the user's knowledge or will? I'd have thought that keeping it on or off by default will lead to the keyboard behaving as the user expects.

      – Rosie F
      Apr 4 at 18:55






    • 3





      I've got one of those keyboards for when I need to log in locally to a normally-headless server, and I can't tell you how many times I've tried to log in as "r66t".

      – Mark
      Apr 4 at 21:01






    • 2





      Rosie, you raise a valid point. The reason I wrote that is because of the expectation that pressing o yields an "o". When NumLock is on, that yields a "6" (hidden under *, ha!). If one uses a numpad to type 1966, it yields 19→→ if NumLock is off. So, users from both camps can be caught off-guard, regardless of the default value. So it is not that the system sneakily changed the state; nowadays people use diverse keyboards in different places, a system can't guess what this user is used to. Numlock=off is the lowest common denominator, as more and more keyboards don't have numpads.

      – ralien
      Apr 4 at 22:51






    • 2





      Fn-Keys are usually not mapped using NumLock. I guess one of the reasons is this issue. On quite a few devices using Fn-Keys, I never saw one using NumLock for switching. Usually you need to always press Fn, sometimes there is an option to reverse the behaviour (e.g. on notebooks, where multimedia keys are the default an Fx keys need Fn you can often switch this in the BIOS).

      – allo
      Apr 5 at 10:15











    • I agree with Rosie, changing a user’s default behavior is not good UX and most of all will lead to fewer errors. I also agree with the answer, if this is a necessary consideration to display the state on screen. I’d argue it isn’t necessary as billions of people have been fine for decades.

      – vol7ron
      Apr 5 at 23:44















    70














    Some compact keyboard layouts don't have a numpad, so those keys are mapped to the right-hand side of the letter section:
    enter image description here



    If NumLock is on, then a user typing the password kill, will actually type 2533. Turning NumLock off will prevent this problem, but of course - it will cause another one for those who do rely on the numpad. Keeping it on or off by default will lead to mode errors - regardless of what initial state is chosen, someone will be surprised by it.



    A better solution would be to reflect the state of the NumLock key on the screen, akin to the CapsLock key. This way there are no surprises, as this state indicator is in the users' locus of attention.



    An example are Acer Revo computers, distributed with compact wireless keyboards. I installed a fresh OS and set up a password, then successfully "confirmed" it. However, what I thought I was doing was different from what the computer saw me do. This problem only became evident when I attempted to connect to the machine remotely, from a place with a proper keyboard.



    Many hours and "this cannot be" statements later, I undersood that NumLock was the culprit.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 10





      How come the cause of mode errors is keeping NumLock on or off by default, rather than changing NumLock's state without the user's knowledge or will? I'd have thought that keeping it on or off by default will lead to the keyboard behaving as the user expects.

      – Rosie F
      Apr 4 at 18:55






    • 3





      I've got one of those keyboards for when I need to log in locally to a normally-headless server, and I can't tell you how many times I've tried to log in as "r66t".

      – Mark
      Apr 4 at 21:01






    • 2





      Rosie, you raise a valid point. The reason I wrote that is because of the expectation that pressing o yields an "o". When NumLock is on, that yields a "6" (hidden under *, ha!). If one uses a numpad to type 1966, it yields 19→→ if NumLock is off. So, users from both camps can be caught off-guard, regardless of the default value. So it is not that the system sneakily changed the state; nowadays people use diverse keyboards in different places, a system can't guess what this user is used to. Numlock=off is the lowest common denominator, as more and more keyboards don't have numpads.

      – ralien
      Apr 4 at 22:51






    • 2





      Fn-Keys are usually not mapped using NumLock. I guess one of the reasons is this issue. On quite a few devices using Fn-Keys, I never saw one using NumLock for switching. Usually you need to always press Fn, sometimes there is an option to reverse the behaviour (e.g. on notebooks, where multimedia keys are the default an Fx keys need Fn you can often switch this in the BIOS).

      – allo
      Apr 5 at 10:15











    • I agree with Rosie, changing a user’s default behavior is not good UX and most of all will lead to fewer errors. I also agree with the answer, if this is a necessary consideration to display the state on screen. I’d argue it isn’t necessary as billions of people have been fine for decades.

      – vol7ron
      Apr 5 at 23:44













    70












    70








    70







    Some compact keyboard layouts don't have a numpad, so those keys are mapped to the right-hand side of the letter section:
    enter image description here



    If NumLock is on, then a user typing the password kill, will actually type 2533. Turning NumLock off will prevent this problem, but of course - it will cause another one for those who do rely on the numpad. Keeping it on or off by default will lead to mode errors - regardless of what initial state is chosen, someone will be surprised by it.



    A better solution would be to reflect the state of the NumLock key on the screen, akin to the CapsLock key. This way there are no surprises, as this state indicator is in the users' locus of attention.



    An example are Acer Revo computers, distributed with compact wireless keyboards. I installed a fresh OS and set up a password, then successfully "confirmed" it. However, what I thought I was doing was different from what the computer saw me do. This problem only became evident when I attempted to connect to the machine remotely, from a place with a proper keyboard.



    Many hours and "this cannot be" statements later, I undersood that NumLock was the culprit.






    share|improve this answer













    Some compact keyboard layouts don't have a numpad, so those keys are mapped to the right-hand side of the letter section:
    enter image description here



    If NumLock is on, then a user typing the password kill, will actually type 2533. Turning NumLock off will prevent this problem, but of course - it will cause another one for those who do rely on the numpad. Keeping it on or off by default will lead to mode errors - regardless of what initial state is chosen, someone will be surprised by it.



    A better solution would be to reflect the state of the NumLock key on the screen, akin to the CapsLock key. This way there are no surprises, as this state indicator is in the users' locus of attention.



    An example are Acer Revo computers, distributed with compact wireless keyboards. I installed a fresh OS and set up a password, then successfully "confirmed" it. However, what I thought I was doing was different from what the computer saw me do. This problem only became evident when I attempted to connect to the machine remotely, from a place with a proper keyboard.



    Many hours and "this cannot be" statements later, I undersood that NumLock was the culprit.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Apr 4 at 10:15









    ralienralien

    1,316811




    1,316811







    • 10





      How come the cause of mode errors is keeping NumLock on or off by default, rather than changing NumLock's state without the user's knowledge or will? I'd have thought that keeping it on or off by default will lead to the keyboard behaving as the user expects.

      – Rosie F
      Apr 4 at 18:55






    • 3





      I've got one of those keyboards for when I need to log in locally to a normally-headless server, and I can't tell you how many times I've tried to log in as "r66t".

      – Mark
      Apr 4 at 21:01






    • 2





      Rosie, you raise a valid point. The reason I wrote that is because of the expectation that pressing o yields an "o". When NumLock is on, that yields a "6" (hidden under *, ha!). If one uses a numpad to type 1966, it yields 19→→ if NumLock is off. So, users from both camps can be caught off-guard, regardless of the default value. So it is not that the system sneakily changed the state; nowadays people use diverse keyboards in different places, a system can't guess what this user is used to. Numlock=off is the lowest common denominator, as more and more keyboards don't have numpads.

      – ralien
      Apr 4 at 22:51






    • 2





      Fn-Keys are usually not mapped using NumLock. I guess one of the reasons is this issue. On quite a few devices using Fn-Keys, I never saw one using NumLock for switching. Usually you need to always press Fn, sometimes there is an option to reverse the behaviour (e.g. on notebooks, where multimedia keys are the default an Fx keys need Fn you can often switch this in the BIOS).

      – allo
      Apr 5 at 10:15











    • I agree with Rosie, changing a user’s default behavior is not good UX and most of all will lead to fewer errors. I also agree with the answer, if this is a necessary consideration to display the state on screen. I’d argue it isn’t necessary as billions of people have been fine for decades.

      – vol7ron
      Apr 5 at 23:44












    • 10





      How come the cause of mode errors is keeping NumLock on or off by default, rather than changing NumLock's state without the user's knowledge or will? I'd have thought that keeping it on or off by default will lead to the keyboard behaving as the user expects.

      – Rosie F
      Apr 4 at 18:55






    • 3





      I've got one of those keyboards for when I need to log in locally to a normally-headless server, and I can't tell you how many times I've tried to log in as "r66t".

      – Mark
      Apr 4 at 21:01






    • 2





      Rosie, you raise a valid point. The reason I wrote that is because of the expectation that pressing o yields an "o". When NumLock is on, that yields a "6" (hidden under *, ha!). If one uses a numpad to type 1966, it yields 19→→ if NumLock is off. So, users from both camps can be caught off-guard, regardless of the default value. So it is not that the system sneakily changed the state; nowadays people use diverse keyboards in different places, a system can't guess what this user is used to. Numlock=off is the lowest common denominator, as more and more keyboards don't have numpads.

      – ralien
      Apr 4 at 22:51






    • 2





      Fn-Keys are usually not mapped using NumLock. I guess one of the reasons is this issue. On quite a few devices using Fn-Keys, I never saw one using NumLock for switching. Usually you need to always press Fn, sometimes there is an option to reverse the behaviour (e.g. on notebooks, where multimedia keys are the default an Fx keys need Fn you can often switch this in the BIOS).

      – allo
      Apr 5 at 10:15











    • I agree with Rosie, changing a user’s default behavior is not good UX and most of all will lead to fewer errors. I also agree with the answer, if this is a necessary consideration to display the state on screen. I’d argue it isn’t necessary as billions of people have been fine for decades.

      – vol7ron
      Apr 5 at 23:44







    10




    10





    How come the cause of mode errors is keeping NumLock on or off by default, rather than changing NumLock's state without the user's knowledge or will? I'd have thought that keeping it on or off by default will lead to the keyboard behaving as the user expects.

    – Rosie F
    Apr 4 at 18:55





    How come the cause of mode errors is keeping NumLock on or off by default, rather than changing NumLock's state without the user's knowledge or will? I'd have thought that keeping it on or off by default will lead to the keyboard behaving as the user expects.

    – Rosie F
    Apr 4 at 18:55




    3




    3





    I've got one of those keyboards for when I need to log in locally to a normally-headless server, and I can't tell you how many times I've tried to log in as "r66t".

    – Mark
    Apr 4 at 21:01





    I've got one of those keyboards for when I need to log in locally to a normally-headless server, and I can't tell you how many times I've tried to log in as "r66t".

    – Mark
    Apr 4 at 21:01




    2




    2





    Rosie, you raise a valid point. The reason I wrote that is because of the expectation that pressing o yields an "o". When NumLock is on, that yields a "6" (hidden under *, ha!). If one uses a numpad to type 1966, it yields 19→→ if NumLock is off. So, users from both camps can be caught off-guard, regardless of the default value. So it is not that the system sneakily changed the state; nowadays people use diverse keyboards in different places, a system can't guess what this user is used to. Numlock=off is the lowest common denominator, as more and more keyboards don't have numpads.

    – ralien
    Apr 4 at 22:51





    Rosie, you raise a valid point. The reason I wrote that is because of the expectation that pressing o yields an "o". When NumLock is on, that yields a "6" (hidden under *, ha!). If one uses a numpad to type 1966, it yields 19→→ if NumLock is off. So, users from both camps can be caught off-guard, regardless of the default value. So it is not that the system sneakily changed the state; nowadays people use diverse keyboards in different places, a system can't guess what this user is used to. Numlock=off is the lowest common denominator, as more and more keyboards don't have numpads.

    – ralien
    Apr 4 at 22:51




    2




    2





    Fn-Keys are usually not mapped using NumLock. I guess one of the reasons is this issue. On quite a few devices using Fn-Keys, I never saw one using NumLock for switching. Usually you need to always press Fn, sometimes there is an option to reverse the behaviour (e.g. on notebooks, where multimedia keys are the default an Fx keys need Fn you can often switch this in the BIOS).

    – allo
    Apr 5 at 10:15





    Fn-Keys are usually not mapped using NumLock. I guess one of the reasons is this issue. On quite a few devices using Fn-Keys, I never saw one using NumLock for switching. Usually you need to always press Fn, sometimes there is an option to reverse the behaviour (e.g. on notebooks, where multimedia keys are the default an Fx keys need Fn you can often switch this in the BIOS).

    – allo
    Apr 5 at 10:15













    I agree with Rosie, changing a user’s default behavior is not good UX and most of all will lead to fewer errors. I also agree with the answer, if this is a necessary consideration to display the state on screen. I’d argue it isn’t necessary as billions of people have been fine for decades.

    – vol7ron
    Apr 5 at 23:44





    I agree with Rosie, changing a user’s default behavior is not good UX and most of all will lead to fewer errors. I also agree with the answer, if this is a necessary consideration to display the state on screen. I’d argue it isn’t necessary as billions of people have been fine for decades.

    – vol7ron
    Apr 5 at 23:44













    9














    It's a bad UX practice primarily because the user is not expecting this to happen. Users will attempt to do an action and will not be able to do so.






    share|improve this answer





























      9














      It's a bad UX practice primarily because the user is not expecting this to happen. Users will attempt to do an action and will not be able to do so.






      share|improve this answer



























        9












        9








        9







        It's a bad UX practice primarily because the user is not expecting this to happen. Users will attempt to do an action and will not be able to do so.






        share|improve this answer















        It's a bad UX practice primarily because the user is not expecting this to happen. Users will attempt to do an action and will not be able to do so.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Apr 4 at 17:24









        Mayo

        5,61852433




        5,61852433










        answered Apr 4 at 8:15









        Juan Jesús MilloJuan Jesús Millo

        682113




        682113





















            3















            Many login screens automatically deactivate the Num Lock key on the keyboard before the user can enter their password.




            I don't believe that this is true.



            It may be that Num Lock happens to be off when at a login screen, but I doubt that the login screen is actively turning it off. That is, it's not intentionally done as some way to enhance security (because it doesn't); it's an artifact of how the rest of the system is designed.



            On Windows, whether Num Lock is on or off is a user-specific preference. If you have a multi-user system and one person prefers Num Lock on and another user prefers Num Lock off, what should the behavior be at the login screen when no one is logged in?



            If I log out, my preferences should no longer be active. Instead, the "default" user's preferences become active, and those are likely to have Num Lock off because that's the safer default for compact/laptop keyboards. (On Windows, this would be stored in the registry, encoded in HKEY_USERS.DEFAULTControl PanelKeyboardInitialKeyboardIndicators.)






            share|improve this answer

























            • As far as I understand, this regedit attribute is only read after startup, and doesn't have any influence on the login screen. NumLock status also seems to be independent from BIOS settings, at least on my Win10.

              – Eric Duminil
              Apr 12 at 13:47















            3















            Many login screens automatically deactivate the Num Lock key on the keyboard before the user can enter their password.




            I don't believe that this is true.



            It may be that Num Lock happens to be off when at a login screen, but I doubt that the login screen is actively turning it off. That is, it's not intentionally done as some way to enhance security (because it doesn't); it's an artifact of how the rest of the system is designed.



            On Windows, whether Num Lock is on or off is a user-specific preference. If you have a multi-user system and one person prefers Num Lock on and another user prefers Num Lock off, what should the behavior be at the login screen when no one is logged in?



            If I log out, my preferences should no longer be active. Instead, the "default" user's preferences become active, and those are likely to have Num Lock off because that's the safer default for compact/laptop keyboards. (On Windows, this would be stored in the registry, encoded in HKEY_USERS.DEFAULTControl PanelKeyboardInitialKeyboardIndicators.)






            share|improve this answer

























            • As far as I understand, this regedit attribute is only read after startup, and doesn't have any influence on the login screen. NumLock status also seems to be independent from BIOS settings, at least on my Win10.

              – Eric Duminil
              Apr 12 at 13:47













            3












            3








            3








            Many login screens automatically deactivate the Num Lock key on the keyboard before the user can enter their password.




            I don't believe that this is true.



            It may be that Num Lock happens to be off when at a login screen, but I doubt that the login screen is actively turning it off. That is, it's not intentionally done as some way to enhance security (because it doesn't); it's an artifact of how the rest of the system is designed.



            On Windows, whether Num Lock is on or off is a user-specific preference. If you have a multi-user system and one person prefers Num Lock on and another user prefers Num Lock off, what should the behavior be at the login screen when no one is logged in?



            If I log out, my preferences should no longer be active. Instead, the "default" user's preferences become active, and those are likely to have Num Lock off because that's the safer default for compact/laptop keyboards. (On Windows, this would be stored in the registry, encoded in HKEY_USERS.DEFAULTControl PanelKeyboardInitialKeyboardIndicators.)






            share|improve this answer
















            Many login screens automatically deactivate the Num Lock key on the keyboard before the user can enter their password.




            I don't believe that this is true.



            It may be that Num Lock happens to be off when at a login screen, but I doubt that the login screen is actively turning it off. That is, it's not intentionally done as some way to enhance security (because it doesn't); it's an artifact of how the rest of the system is designed.



            On Windows, whether Num Lock is on or off is a user-specific preference. If you have a multi-user system and one person prefers Num Lock on and another user prefers Num Lock off, what should the behavior be at the login screen when no one is logged in?



            If I log out, my preferences should no longer be active. Instead, the "default" user's preferences become active, and those are likely to have Num Lock off because that's the safer default for compact/laptop keyboards. (On Windows, this would be stored in the registry, encoded in HKEY_USERS.DEFAULTControl PanelKeyboardInitialKeyboardIndicators.)







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Apr 6 at 3:10

























            answered Apr 6 at 2:50









            jamesdlinjamesdlin

            33527




            33527












            • As far as I understand, this regedit attribute is only read after startup, and doesn't have any influence on the login screen. NumLock status also seems to be independent from BIOS settings, at least on my Win10.

              – Eric Duminil
              Apr 12 at 13:47

















            • As far as I understand, this regedit attribute is only read after startup, and doesn't have any influence on the login screen. NumLock status also seems to be independent from BIOS settings, at least on my Win10.

              – Eric Duminil
              Apr 12 at 13:47
















            As far as I understand, this regedit attribute is only read after startup, and doesn't have any influence on the login screen. NumLock status also seems to be independent from BIOS settings, at least on my Win10.

            – Eric Duminil
            Apr 12 at 13:47





            As far as I understand, this regedit attribute is only read after startup, and doesn't have any influence on the login screen. NumLock status also seems to be independent from BIOS settings, at least on my Win10.

            – Eric Duminil
            Apr 12 at 13:47



            Popular posts from this blog

            Adding axes to figuresAdding axes labels to LaTeX figuresLaTeX equivalent of ConTeXt buffersRotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?adding axes to shapesAlign axes across subfiguresAdding figures with a certain orderLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themAdding axes labels to LaTeX figures

            Luettelo Yhdysvaltain laivaston lentotukialuksista Lähteet | Navigointivalikko

            Gary (muusikko) Sisällysluettelo Historia | Rockin' High | Lähteet | Aiheesta muualla | NavigointivalikkoInfobox OKTuomas "Gary" Keskinen Ancaran kitaristiksiProjekti Rockin' High