Decomposition of product of two Plucker coordinates The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InThe topology of open semi-algebraic sets (appl.: totally positive matrices)Characterizing zeros of schur functions over $mathbbR^n$ or $mathbbC^n$Extending the vertex-facet correspondence from Δ to ΘDecomposing polyhedral cones into “direct sums” and a polynomialReal plane cubic curves from points in Gr(3,6) via a certain 6x6 determinantCross-ratio and projective transformationsComparing parametrizations of unipotent radicalHow do I use Walsh-Hadamard matrices to compute Fourier coefficients of a boolean function?Plucker coordinates of flag varietiesChebyshev-like Problem for Plucker Coordinates

Decomposition of product of two Plucker coordinates



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InThe topology of open semi-algebraic sets (appl.: totally positive matrices)Characterizing zeros of schur functions over $mathbbR^n$ or $mathbbC^n$Extending the vertex-facet correspondence from Δ to ΘDecomposing polyhedral cones into “direct sums” and a polynomialReal plane cubic curves from points in Gr(3,6) via a certain 6x6 determinantCross-ratio and projective transformationsComparing parametrizations of unipotent radicalHow do I use Walsh-Hadamard matrices to compute Fourier coefficients of a boolean function?Plucker coordinates of flag varietiesChebyshev-like Problem for Plucker Coordinates










1












$begingroup$


Let $Gr(k,n)$ be the set of all $k$-dimensional subspaces of an $n$-dimensional vector space. Then $Gr(k,n)$ is a projective variety and it has Plucker coordinates $P_i_1, ldots, i_k$ ($i_1<ldots<i_k$) which is the determinant of the matrix $(x_ij)_i in [k], j in i_1, ldots, i_k$. Certain Plucker coordinates satisfy the Plucker relation. For example, for $Gr(2,n)$, $P_12P_34 + P_23P_14-P_13P_24=0$. Therefore $P_13P_24 = P_12P_34 + P_23P_14$ can be viewed as a decomposition of the product of $P_13$ and $P_24$. For $P_12$, $P_34$, we say that their product is irreducible. That is $P_12P_34$ cannot be written as a sum (with two or more terms in the summation, each summand has positive coefficient) of products of Plucker coordinates.



Given two Plucker coordinates $P_i_1, ldots, i_k$, $P_j_1, ldots, j_k$, is there some formula for the decomposition of $P_i_1, ldots, i_k P_j_1, ldots, j_k = sum_T c_T P_T$ (P_T is a product of certain Plucker coordinates, $c_T>0$) in the literature? Thank you very much.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    1












    $begingroup$


    Let $Gr(k,n)$ be the set of all $k$-dimensional subspaces of an $n$-dimensional vector space. Then $Gr(k,n)$ is a projective variety and it has Plucker coordinates $P_i_1, ldots, i_k$ ($i_1<ldots<i_k$) which is the determinant of the matrix $(x_ij)_i in [k], j in i_1, ldots, i_k$. Certain Plucker coordinates satisfy the Plucker relation. For example, for $Gr(2,n)$, $P_12P_34 + P_23P_14-P_13P_24=0$. Therefore $P_13P_24 = P_12P_34 + P_23P_14$ can be viewed as a decomposition of the product of $P_13$ and $P_24$. For $P_12$, $P_34$, we say that their product is irreducible. That is $P_12P_34$ cannot be written as a sum (with two or more terms in the summation, each summand has positive coefficient) of products of Plucker coordinates.



    Given two Plucker coordinates $P_i_1, ldots, i_k$, $P_j_1, ldots, j_k$, is there some formula for the decomposition of $P_i_1, ldots, i_k P_j_1, ldots, j_k = sum_T c_T P_T$ (P_T is a product of certain Plucker coordinates, $c_T>0$) in the literature? Thank you very much.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Let $Gr(k,n)$ be the set of all $k$-dimensional subspaces of an $n$-dimensional vector space. Then $Gr(k,n)$ is a projective variety and it has Plucker coordinates $P_i_1, ldots, i_k$ ($i_1<ldots<i_k$) which is the determinant of the matrix $(x_ij)_i in [k], j in i_1, ldots, i_k$. Certain Plucker coordinates satisfy the Plucker relation. For example, for $Gr(2,n)$, $P_12P_34 + P_23P_14-P_13P_24=0$. Therefore $P_13P_24 = P_12P_34 + P_23P_14$ can be viewed as a decomposition of the product of $P_13$ and $P_24$. For $P_12$, $P_34$, we say that their product is irreducible. That is $P_12P_34$ cannot be written as a sum (with two or more terms in the summation, each summand has positive coefficient) of products of Plucker coordinates.



      Given two Plucker coordinates $P_i_1, ldots, i_k$, $P_j_1, ldots, j_k$, is there some formula for the decomposition of $P_i_1, ldots, i_k P_j_1, ldots, j_k = sum_T c_T P_T$ (P_T is a product of certain Plucker coordinates, $c_T>0$) in the literature? Thank you very much.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Let $Gr(k,n)$ be the set of all $k$-dimensional subspaces of an $n$-dimensional vector space. Then $Gr(k,n)$ is a projective variety and it has Plucker coordinates $P_i_1, ldots, i_k$ ($i_1<ldots<i_k$) which is the determinant of the matrix $(x_ij)_i in [k], j in i_1, ldots, i_k$. Certain Plucker coordinates satisfy the Plucker relation. For example, for $Gr(2,n)$, $P_12P_34 + P_23P_14-P_13P_24=0$. Therefore $P_13P_24 = P_12P_34 + P_23P_14$ can be viewed as a decomposition of the product of $P_13$ and $P_24$. For $P_12$, $P_34$, we say that their product is irreducible. That is $P_12P_34$ cannot be written as a sum (with two or more terms in the summation, each summand has positive coefficient) of products of Plucker coordinates.



      Given two Plucker coordinates $P_i_1, ldots, i_k$, $P_j_1, ldots, j_k$, is there some formula for the decomposition of $P_i_1, ldots, i_k P_j_1, ldots, j_k = sum_T c_T P_T$ (P_T is a product of certain Plucker coordinates, $c_T>0$) in the literature? Thank you very much.







      ag.algebraic-geometry co.combinatorics






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Mar 30 at 12:57









      Jianrong LiJianrong Li

      2,53721319




      2,53721319




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          6












          $begingroup$

          Your exact question seems a little strange to me because, beyond the 3-term relation, more general Plücker relations will have many terms with both positive and negative signs. So for $k>2$ it is not clear that we can ever do decompositions of the type you're describing. But the question of which subsets of Plücker coordinates are algebraically independent and generate the coordinate ring of the Grassmannian, and how do we write arbitrary elements of the coordinate ring in the corresponding basis, is the beginning of the study of cluster algebras. See e.g. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0311148.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "504"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f326748%2fdecomposition-of-product-of-two-plucker-coordinates%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            6












            $begingroup$

            Your exact question seems a little strange to me because, beyond the 3-term relation, more general Plücker relations will have many terms with both positive and negative signs. So for $k>2$ it is not clear that we can ever do decompositions of the type you're describing. But the question of which subsets of Plücker coordinates are algebraically independent and generate the coordinate ring of the Grassmannian, and how do we write arbitrary elements of the coordinate ring in the corresponding basis, is the beginning of the study of cluster algebras. See e.g. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0311148.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              6












              $begingroup$

              Your exact question seems a little strange to me because, beyond the 3-term relation, more general Plücker relations will have many terms with both positive and negative signs. So for $k>2$ it is not clear that we can ever do decompositions of the type you're describing. But the question of which subsets of Plücker coordinates are algebraically independent and generate the coordinate ring of the Grassmannian, and how do we write arbitrary elements of the coordinate ring in the corresponding basis, is the beginning of the study of cluster algebras. See e.g. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0311148.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$















                6












                6








                6





                $begingroup$

                Your exact question seems a little strange to me because, beyond the 3-term relation, more general Plücker relations will have many terms with both positive and negative signs. So for $k>2$ it is not clear that we can ever do decompositions of the type you're describing. But the question of which subsets of Plücker coordinates are algebraically independent and generate the coordinate ring of the Grassmannian, and how do we write arbitrary elements of the coordinate ring in the corresponding basis, is the beginning of the study of cluster algebras. See e.g. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0311148.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Your exact question seems a little strange to me because, beyond the 3-term relation, more general Plücker relations will have many terms with both positive and negative signs. So for $k>2$ it is not clear that we can ever do decompositions of the type you're describing. But the question of which subsets of Plücker coordinates are algebraically independent and generate the coordinate ring of the Grassmannian, and how do we write arbitrary elements of the coordinate ring in the corresponding basis, is the beginning of the study of cluster algebras. See e.g. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0311148.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Mar 30 at 15:23









                Sam HopkinsSam Hopkins

                5,23712560




                5,23712560



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f326748%2fdecomposition-of-product-of-two-plucker-coordinates%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Adding axes to figuresAdding axes labels to LaTeX figuresLaTeX equivalent of ConTeXt buffersRotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?adding axes to shapesAlign axes across subfiguresAdding figures with a certain orderLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themAdding axes labels to LaTeX figures

                    Tähtien Talli Jäsenet | Lähteet | NavigointivalikkoSuomen Hippos – Tähtien Talli

                    Do these cracks on my tires look bad? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowDry rot tire should I replace?Having to replace tiresFishtailed so easily? Bad tires? ABS?Filling the tires with something other than air, to avoid puncture hassles?Used Michelin tires safe to install?Do these tyre cracks necessitate replacement?Rumbling noise: tires or mechanicalIs it possible to fix noisy feathered tires?Are bad winter tires still better than summer tires in winter?Torque converter failure - Related to replacing only 2 tires?Why use snow tires on all 4 wheels on 2-wheel-drive cars?