Which organization defines CJK Unified Ideographs? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InCharacters which have several different shapesHow useful are the kanji in reading Chinese?Can Chinese readers scan large amounts of text faster/more accurately than their alphabet-using counterparts?丼: why is “well” also “bowl of food”?What Does Unicode 8.0 Mean For Chinese?How are blanks indicated for placeholders in Chinese (like ???)Is there a dictionary of standard character variants?How to display CJK Extension F?How is it decided as to which character is used on the tech terminology?How does 子 come to mean 'midnight'?

Time travel alters history but people keep saying nothing's changed

How to answer pointed "are you quitting" questioning when I don't want them to suspect

How to Override Magento 2 vendor files

Return to UK after being refused entry years previously

Can I connect a DC high voltage booster directly to my Raspberry Pi?

What are the motivations for publishing new editions of an existing textbook, beyond new discoveries in a field?

Is there a general name for the setup in which payoffs are not known exactly but players try to influence each other's perception of the payoffs?

The difference between dialogue marks

I see my dog run

Loose spokes after only a few rides

Are there any other methods to apply to solving simultaneous equations?

Process LaTeX code only if package is loaded

What spell level should this homebrew After-Image spell be?

Spanish for "widget"

Geography at the pixel level

How can I make payments on the Internet without leaving a money trail?

Aging parents with no investments

Is flight data recorder erased after every flight?

Potential by Assembling Charges

How is radar separation assured between primary and secondary targets?

Can a zener diode with a higher power dissipation be used in place of the original one in an audio amplifier?

What tool would a Roman-age civilization have to grind silver and other metals into dust?

Did Section 31 appear in Star Trek: The Next Generation?

Output the Arecibo Message



Which organization defines CJK Unified Ideographs?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InCharacters which have several different shapesHow useful are the kanji in reading Chinese?Can Chinese readers scan large amounts of text faster/more accurately than their alphabet-using counterparts?丼: why is “well” also “bowl of food”?What Does Unicode 8.0 Mean For Chinese?How are blanks indicated for placeholders in Chinese (like ???)Is there a dictionary of standard character variants?How to display CJK Extension F?How is it decided as to which character is used on the tech terminology?How does 子 come to mean 'midnight'?










2















CJK means Chinese, Japanese and Korean. Well, which organization defines the standard?










share|improve this question






















  • unicode.org

    – fefe
    Mar 29 at 2:24











  • @fefe, Unicode defines the code of every character. CJK defines the ideographs. For example, there is a character 一 in Chinese, and there is a 一 in Japanese too. CJK defines they are the same character, but not the code.

    – Zhang
    Mar 29 at 2:28











  • Then, nobody defines the "unified" ideographs. Every country/region might have its own locale standard to define its own character set. The Unicode just combines them into one set.

    – fefe
    Mar 29 at 2:31











  • unicode.org/charts/unihan.html The Unihan Database organizes information relating to the properties of CJK Unified Ideographs. Unihan is related to CJK, not equal to.

    – Zhang
    Mar 29 at 2:32
















2















CJK means Chinese, Japanese and Korean. Well, which organization defines the standard?










share|improve this question






















  • unicode.org

    – fefe
    Mar 29 at 2:24











  • @fefe, Unicode defines the code of every character. CJK defines the ideographs. For example, there is a character 一 in Chinese, and there is a 一 in Japanese too. CJK defines they are the same character, but not the code.

    – Zhang
    Mar 29 at 2:28











  • Then, nobody defines the "unified" ideographs. Every country/region might have its own locale standard to define its own character set. The Unicode just combines them into one set.

    – fefe
    Mar 29 at 2:31











  • unicode.org/charts/unihan.html The Unihan Database organizes information relating to the properties of CJK Unified Ideographs. Unihan is related to CJK, not equal to.

    – Zhang
    Mar 29 at 2:32














2












2








2


1






CJK means Chinese, Japanese and Korean. Well, which organization defines the standard?










share|improve this question














CJK means Chinese, Japanese and Korean. Well, which organization defines the standard?







characters






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Mar 29 at 2:23









AdministratorAdministrator

1725




1725












  • unicode.org

    – fefe
    Mar 29 at 2:24











  • @fefe, Unicode defines the code of every character. CJK defines the ideographs. For example, there is a character 一 in Chinese, and there is a 一 in Japanese too. CJK defines they are the same character, but not the code.

    – Zhang
    Mar 29 at 2:28











  • Then, nobody defines the "unified" ideographs. Every country/region might have its own locale standard to define its own character set. The Unicode just combines them into one set.

    – fefe
    Mar 29 at 2:31











  • unicode.org/charts/unihan.html The Unihan Database organizes information relating to the properties of CJK Unified Ideographs. Unihan is related to CJK, not equal to.

    – Zhang
    Mar 29 at 2:32


















  • unicode.org

    – fefe
    Mar 29 at 2:24











  • @fefe, Unicode defines the code of every character. CJK defines the ideographs. For example, there is a character 一 in Chinese, and there is a 一 in Japanese too. CJK defines they are the same character, but not the code.

    – Zhang
    Mar 29 at 2:28











  • Then, nobody defines the "unified" ideographs. Every country/region might have its own locale standard to define its own character set. The Unicode just combines them into one set.

    – fefe
    Mar 29 at 2:31











  • unicode.org/charts/unihan.html The Unihan Database organizes information relating to the properties of CJK Unified Ideographs. Unihan is related to CJK, not equal to.

    – Zhang
    Mar 29 at 2:32

















unicode.org

– fefe
Mar 29 at 2:24





unicode.org

– fefe
Mar 29 at 2:24













@fefe, Unicode defines the code of every character. CJK defines the ideographs. For example, there is a character 一 in Chinese, and there is a 一 in Japanese too. CJK defines they are the same character, but not the code.

– Zhang
Mar 29 at 2:28





@fefe, Unicode defines the code of every character. CJK defines the ideographs. For example, there is a character 一 in Chinese, and there is a 一 in Japanese too. CJK defines they are the same character, but not the code.

– Zhang
Mar 29 at 2:28













Then, nobody defines the "unified" ideographs. Every country/region might have its own locale standard to define its own character set. The Unicode just combines them into one set.

– fefe
Mar 29 at 2:31





Then, nobody defines the "unified" ideographs. Every country/region might have its own locale standard to define its own character set. The Unicode just combines them into one set.

– fefe
Mar 29 at 2:31













unicode.org/charts/unihan.html The Unihan Database organizes information relating to the properties of CJK Unified Ideographs. Unihan is related to CJK, not equal to.

– Zhang
Mar 29 at 2:32






unicode.org/charts/unihan.html The Unihan Database organizes information relating to the properties of CJK Unified Ideographs. Unihan is related to CJK, not equal to.

– Zhang
Mar 29 at 2:32











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















6














On the Frequently Asked Questions page for Chinese and Japanese on Unicode there is a question that asks:




Q: Who is responsible for future CJK characters?




The answer reads:




A: The development and extension of the CJK characters is being done by the Ideographic Rapporteur Group (IRG), which includes official representatives of China, Hong Kong (SAR), Macao (SAR), Singapore, Japan, South Korea, North Korea, Taiwan and Vietnam, plus a representative from the Unicode consortium. For more information, see the IRG home page.



The IRG is very carefully cataloging, reviewing, and assessing CJK characters for inclusion into the standard. The only real limitation on the number of CJK characters in the standard is the ability of this group to process them, because the characters are increasingly obscure (no person knows more than a fraction of the set already encoded).




Each region has their own official representatives who helps in maintaining standards in connection with IRG.




Your titled also asks about unified standards. The same FAQ above has a separate question:




Q: What is the process for proposing new CJK unified ideographs?




which is answered:




A: Newly proposed CJK unified ideographs are first submitted to the IRG through national bodies or liaison organizations, and are then assembled into a new "IRG Working Set" that goes through several rounds of detailed review and scrutiny before being approved for standardization as a new CJK unified ideographs extension. Individuals who wish to propose the encoding of new CJK unified ideographs are encouraged to work with their respective country's national body.




The answer is more or less the same: regional organizations work with IRG on these issues.






share|improve this answer

























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "371"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchinese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f33433%2fwhich-organization-defines-cjk-unified-ideographs%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    6














    On the Frequently Asked Questions page for Chinese and Japanese on Unicode there is a question that asks:




    Q: Who is responsible for future CJK characters?




    The answer reads:




    A: The development and extension of the CJK characters is being done by the Ideographic Rapporteur Group (IRG), which includes official representatives of China, Hong Kong (SAR), Macao (SAR), Singapore, Japan, South Korea, North Korea, Taiwan and Vietnam, plus a representative from the Unicode consortium. For more information, see the IRG home page.



    The IRG is very carefully cataloging, reviewing, and assessing CJK characters for inclusion into the standard. The only real limitation on the number of CJK characters in the standard is the ability of this group to process them, because the characters are increasingly obscure (no person knows more than a fraction of the set already encoded).




    Each region has their own official representatives who helps in maintaining standards in connection with IRG.




    Your titled also asks about unified standards. The same FAQ above has a separate question:




    Q: What is the process for proposing new CJK unified ideographs?




    which is answered:




    A: Newly proposed CJK unified ideographs are first submitted to the IRG through national bodies or liaison organizations, and are then assembled into a new "IRG Working Set" that goes through several rounds of detailed review and scrutiny before being approved for standardization as a new CJK unified ideographs extension. Individuals who wish to propose the encoding of new CJK unified ideographs are encouraged to work with their respective country's national body.




    The answer is more or less the same: regional organizations work with IRG on these issues.






    share|improve this answer





























      6














      On the Frequently Asked Questions page for Chinese and Japanese on Unicode there is a question that asks:




      Q: Who is responsible for future CJK characters?




      The answer reads:




      A: The development and extension of the CJK characters is being done by the Ideographic Rapporteur Group (IRG), which includes official representatives of China, Hong Kong (SAR), Macao (SAR), Singapore, Japan, South Korea, North Korea, Taiwan and Vietnam, plus a representative from the Unicode consortium. For more information, see the IRG home page.



      The IRG is very carefully cataloging, reviewing, and assessing CJK characters for inclusion into the standard. The only real limitation on the number of CJK characters in the standard is the ability of this group to process them, because the characters are increasingly obscure (no person knows more than a fraction of the set already encoded).




      Each region has their own official representatives who helps in maintaining standards in connection with IRG.




      Your titled also asks about unified standards. The same FAQ above has a separate question:




      Q: What is the process for proposing new CJK unified ideographs?




      which is answered:




      A: Newly proposed CJK unified ideographs are first submitted to the IRG through national bodies or liaison organizations, and are then assembled into a new "IRG Working Set" that goes through several rounds of detailed review and scrutiny before being approved for standardization as a new CJK unified ideographs extension. Individuals who wish to propose the encoding of new CJK unified ideographs are encouraged to work with their respective country's national body.




      The answer is more or less the same: regional organizations work with IRG on these issues.






      share|improve this answer



























        6












        6








        6







        On the Frequently Asked Questions page for Chinese and Japanese on Unicode there is a question that asks:




        Q: Who is responsible for future CJK characters?




        The answer reads:




        A: The development and extension of the CJK characters is being done by the Ideographic Rapporteur Group (IRG), which includes official representatives of China, Hong Kong (SAR), Macao (SAR), Singapore, Japan, South Korea, North Korea, Taiwan and Vietnam, plus a representative from the Unicode consortium. For more information, see the IRG home page.



        The IRG is very carefully cataloging, reviewing, and assessing CJK characters for inclusion into the standard. The only real limitation on the number of CJK characters in the standard is the ability of this group to process them, because the characters are increasingly obscure (no person knows more than a fraction of the set already encoded).




        Each region has their own official representatives who helps in maintaining standards in connection with IRG.




        Your titled also asks about unified standards. The same FAQ above has a separate question:




        Q: What is the process for proposing new CJK unified ideographs?




        which is answered:




        A: Newly proposed CJK unified ideographs are first submitted to the IRG through national bodies or liaison organizations, and are then assembled into a new "IRG Working Set" that goes through several rounds of detailed review and scrutiny before being approved for standardization as a new CJK unified ideographs extension. Individuals who wish to propose the encoding of new CJK unified ideographs are encouraged to work with their respective country's national body.




        The answer is more or less the same: regional organizations work with IRG on these issues.






        share|improve this answer















        On the Frequently Asked Questions page for Chinese and Japanese on Unicode there is a question that asks:




        Q: Who is responsible for future CJK characters?




        The answer reads:




        A: The development and extension of the CJK characters is being done by the Ideographic Rapporteur Group (IRG), which includes official representatives of China, Hong Kong (SAR), Macao (SAR), Singapore, Japan, South Korea, North Korea, Taiwan and Vietnam, plus a representative from the Unicode consortium. For more information, see the IRG home page.



        The IRG is very carefully cataloging, reviewing, and assessing CJK characters for inclusion into the standard. The only real limitation on the number of CJK characters in the standard is the ability of this group to process them, because the characters are increasingly obscure (no person knows more than a fraction of the set already encoded).




        Each region has their own official representatives who helps in maintaining standards in connection with IRG.




        Your titled also asks about unified standards. The same FAQ above has a separate question:




        Q: What is the process for proposing new CJK unified ideographs?




        which is answered:




        A: Newly proposed CJK unified ideographs are first submitted to the IRG through national bodies or liaison organizations, and are then assembled into a new "IRG Working Set" that goes through several rounds of detailed review and scrutiny before being approved for standardization as a new CJK unified ideographs extension. Individuals who wish to propose the encoding of new CJK unified ideographs are encouraged to work with their respective country's national body.




        The answer is more or less the same: regional organizations work with IRG on these issues.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Mar 29 at 2:50

























        answered Mar 29 at 2:41









        user3306356user3306356

        16.8k52973




        16.8k52973



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Chinese Language Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchinese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f33433%2fwhich-organization-defines-cjk-unified-ideographs%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Adding axes to figuresAdding axes labels to LaTeX figuresLaTeX equivalent of ConTeXt buffersRotate a node but not its content: the case of the ellipse decorationHow to define the default vertical distance between nodes?TikZ scaling graphic and adjust node position and keep font sizeNumerical conditional within tikz keys?adding axes to shapesAlign axes across subfiguresAdding figures with a certain orderLine up nested tikz enviroments or how to get rid of themAdding axes labels to LaTeX figures

            Tähtien Talli Jäsenet | Lähteet | NavigointivalikkoSuomen Hippos – Tähtien Talli

            Do these cracks on my tires look bad? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowDry rot tire should I replace?Having to replace tiresFishtailed so easily? Bad tires? ABS?Filling the tires with something other than air, to avoid puncture hassles?Used Michelin tires safe to install?Do these tyre cracks necessitate replacement?Rumbling noise: tires or mechanicalIs it possible to fix noisy feathered tires?Are bad winter tires still better than summer tires in winter?Torque converter failure - Related to replacing only 2 tires?Why use snow tires on all 4 wheels on 2-wheel-drive cars?